THIS IS A PRESENTATION FOR THE FREE-ENERGY SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP (“FESIG”) GIVEN IN

2017.

PLEASE UNDERSTAND CLEARLY THAT THIS PRESENTATION MUST NOT BE THOUGHT OF AS

ENCOURAGEMENT THAT YOU SHOULD ATTEMPT TO CONSTRUCT ANYTHING SHOWN OR DISCUSSED
HERE, AS THIS PRESENTATION IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY.

WE LIVE SURROUNDED BY AN ENERGY FIELD OF EFFECTIVELY UNLIMITED POWER. WE CAN ACCESS

THAT POWER FOR OUR OWN USE IN TWENTY DIFFERENT WAYS. HOWEVER, IF THE METHOD OF
ACCESSING THAT ENERGY IS A PASSIVE ONE, THEN PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT YOU, YOURSELF
CAN AND WILL AFFECT THE FLOW OF POWER. THAT EFFECT IS CALLED THE “YOU” FACTOR.

A COPY OF THIS BRIEF INTRODUCTION CAN BE DOWNLOADED FREE FROM:

http://www.free-energy-info.com/FESIG2.pdf

MUCH MORE DETAIL ON ALL OF THE DEVICES MENTIONED IN THIS SUMMARY

IS IN THE FREE DOWNLOAD : www.free-energy-info.com/PJKbook.pdf
THE DENIS SABOURIN GENERATOR :

THIS IS AN ULTRA-SIMPLE SELF-POWERED GENERATOR WHICH CAN CHARGE A CELL PHONE

BATTERY. THE PLASTIC FLOAT FROM A COMMERCIAL FISHING NET IS USED AS THE ROTOR AND IT
HAS FOUR N-52 GRADE NEODYMIUM 20 mm DIAMETER MAGNETS GLUED TO IT :
THE FLOAT IS GLUED TO A TINY MOTOR WHICH IS UNDER-RUN IN ORDER TO CUT THE DRIVE
CURRENT TO A MINIMUM, AND THE MOTOR/FLOAT ASSEMPLY IS SURROUNDED BY EIGHT COILS,
EACH OF WHICH HAVE BEEN WOUND WITH TWO STRANDS OF 50 GRAMS OF 0.19 mm DIAMETER
ENAMELLED COPPER WIRE AS SHOWN ABOVE. THE COILS ARE CONNECTED IN PAIRS IN A MOST
PECULIAR WAY :

EVEN WITH THE ROTOR ONLY SPINNING AT 60 RPM, THESE COILS HAVE A SUBSTANTIAL OUTPUT.

THIS IS USED TO CHARGE A 3-VOLT LITHIUM BATTERY WHICH POWERS A COMMERCIAL MODULE
WHICH PRODUCES A USB OUTPUT. THAT OUTPUT SUITS THE MOBILE PHONE WITH ITS BATTERY
PROTECTION CIRCUITRY AGAINST OVER CHARGING.

THE PROBLEM HERE IS THAT THE 3-VOLT LITHIUM BATTERY WHICH RUNS THE ROTOR DRIVING
MOTOR IS DISCHARGING STEADILY, ALTHOUGH THAT BATTERY CAN SUSTAIN THE DRIVE MOTOR
FOR A VERY LONG TIME.

MR. SABOURIN DEALT WITH THAT PROBLEM BY DIVERTING THE CHARGING CURRENT TO THE
BATTERY AND FEEDING IT TO BATTERY 1 ABOVE FOR 10 SECONDS EVERY TEN MINUTES :
HOWEVER, THAT REQUIRES A SWITCHING BOX FOR WHAT IS A VERY SIMPLE TASK, AND SO HE
CHANGED THE ARRANGEMENT TO FEED A SMALL AMOUNT OF THE CHARGING CURRENT
CONTINUOUSLY TO THE DRIVE BATTERY, ELIMINATING THE SWITCHING BOX :

ENDING UP WITH A VERY SIMPLE ARRANGEMENT WHICH IS SELF-POWERED AND WHICH CAN
CHARGE MOBILE PHONE BATTERIES. THE ROTOR IS MOUNTED ON A 5-VOLT FAN :

THIS DESIGN WAS THOUGHT UP AND BUILT BY A MAN WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTAND ELECTRONICS
AND WHO REFUSES TO WIND ANY COILS. HE TENDS TO USE COMPONENTS SALVAGED FROM OLD
EQUIPMENT AND TOYS. THIS DESIGN RELIES ON THE BATTERY CHARGING PROTECTION CIRCUITS
INSIDE THE MOBILE PHONE AS THEY USE LITHIUM BATTERIES WHICH ARE VERY HARD TO CHARGE
SAFELY.
AROUND 1990 Mr WILSON OF TEXAS CASUALLY TRIED TO LINK SOME CAR COMPONENTS WITH AN
OLD TABLE AND FOUND THAT WHAT HE HAD WAS VERY USEFUL :

THE TABLE WAS FIVE FEET IN DIAMETER AND TWO INCHES THICK AND SO WILL HAVE WEIGHED AT
LEAST 60 KILOGRAMS WHICH IS MORE THAN CHAS CAMPBELL’S VERY EFFECTIVE FIRST FLYWHEEL
SYSTEM. Mr WILSON USED A VERY CASUAL AND INEFFECTIVE METHOD OF CONNECTING THE DRIVE
BAND TO THE TABLE TOP AS HE JUST TAPPED IN A FEW NAILS AT AN ANGLE TO FORM A ROUGH V-
SHAPED CHANNEL. HIS GENERATOR RAN SELF-POWERED FOR THREE DAYS BEFORE THE NAILS
FELL OUT.
TERUO KAWAI’S ELECTRIC MOTOR (Patent US 5,436,518 July 1995)

THIS IS AN INTERESTING DESIGN WITH TWELVE STATOR ELECTROMAGNETS SURROUNDING A

ROTOR WHICH HAS THREE MAGNETIC POLES.

THE LEFT HAND DIAGRAM SHOWS THE FRONT FACE OF THE MOTOR WITH ITS TWELVE RED
ELECTROMAGNETS SURROUNDING AN UNUSUALLY SHAPED STEEL ROTOR COLOURED YELLOW.

THE RIGHT HAND DIAGRAM SHOWS A CROSS-SECTION THROUGH THE MOTOR. THE BLUE
RECTANGLES ARE PERMANENT MAGNETS WHICH TERUO DESCRIBES AS BEING “A RING OF
MAGNETS” ALTHOUGH IT IS NOT IMMEDIATELY OBVIOUS WHY A RING MAGNET SHOULD NOT BE
USED. PERHAPS NONE WERE AVAILABLE WITH THE NECESSARY DIAMETERS. HE ALSO SAYS THAT
THE MAGNETS ARE BOLTED TO THE ROTORS.

THE FRAME MATERIAL SUPPORTING THE BALL BEARINGS AND ELECTROMAGNETS IS ANY SUITABLE
NON-MAGNETIC MATERIAL, AND WHILE ALUMINIUM IS MENTIONED, I WOULD STRONGLY
RECOMMEND THAT NEITHER ALUMINIUM NOR COPPER IS USED, ESPECIALLY SINCE PLASTIC
CHOPPING BOARD MATERIAL IS VERY CHEAP AND VERY ROBUST.

THE ROTOR AND STATOR ARE SOMEWHAT UNUSUAL :

BECAUSE OF THE INNER MAGNETS, EACH OF THE STEEL ROTORS HAVE THREE POLES EACH –
THREE NORTH POLES AT ONE END AND THREE SOUTH POLES AT THE OTHER END. THE AXLE OF
THE MOTOR IS GOOD QUALITY STAINLESS STEEL AS THAT IS BOTH ROBUST AND NON-MAGNETIC.

THE SWITCHING OF THE SUPPLY CURRENT IS SIMILAR TO THAT OF THE CHARLES FLYNN MAGNET
MOTOR AND TERUO’S MOTOR HAS BEEN MEASURED WITH COP>3 WHICH MEANS THAT THE OUTPUT
POWER IS MORE THAN THREE TIMES THAT OF THE INPUT POWER.

THE INPUT POWER SWITCHING OCCURS FOUR TIMES PER REVOLUTION AND IT OCCURS JUST AS
THE LEADING EDGE OF A ROTOR ARM APPROACHES AN ELECTROMAGNET :

HERE, THE ELECTROMAGNETS SHOWN IN BLUE HAVE JUST BEEN POWERED UP AND THIS DRAWS
THE YELLOW ROTOR ARMS IN A CLOCKWISE DIRECTION TOWARDS THE POWERED UP
ELECTROMAGNETS. THE MAGNETIC FORCE IS IN ATTRACTION MODE AND WHILE THIS IS SLIGHTLY
LESS POWERFUL THAN REPULSION MODE, IT DOES NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE
MAGNETS.
THE SWITCHING SUGGESTED IS THE SAME AS FOR THE CHARGES FLYNN MOTOR, NAMELY, AN
OPTICAL TIMING DISC MOUNTED ON THE AXLE SHAFT :

WHILE TERUO SHOWS VARIOUS ALTERNATIVE VERSIONS OF THE MOTOR, HE STATES THE RESULT
OF A TEST RUN ON THE MOTOR : “PURE STEEL WAS USED AS A MAGNETIC MATERIAL . IT WAS 30
mm THICK WITH ‘TEETH’ OF 218 mm DIAMETER AND NOTCHES OF 158 mm DIAMETER. A 1000 GAUSS
FERRITE MAGNET WAS USED AS THE PERMANENT MAGNET. ELECTRIC POWER OF 19.55 WATTS
WAS APPLIED TO THE ELECTROMAGNETS (17 VOLTS AT 1.15 AMPS). THIS PRODUCED 100 RPM WITH
A TORQUE OF 60.52 Kg-cm AND AN OUTPUT OF 62.16 WATTS.”

WHILE AN OPTICAL SWITCHING DISC CERTAINLY WORKS WELL, IT WILL PRODUCE A ROTATIONAL
SPEED WHICH IS DETERMINED BY THE POWER SUPPLY AND THE LOAD. I SUGGEST THAT A SIMPLE
POWER SUPPLY WOULD GIVE SPEED CONTROL :
RAOUL HATEM HAS POWERED HOTELS WITH HIS ARRANGEMENT OF EQUIPMENT BUT “SCIENTISTS”
DISPUTE HIM BECAUSE THEY SAY THAT WHAT HE DOES IS “IMPOSSIBLE”.

IN 1955 RAOUL COUPLED A MOTOR WITH 36 RARE EARTH MAGNETS TO A GENERATOR WITH A
SIMILAR 36 RARE EARTH MAGNETS. HE CLAIMS THAT THE SPINNING MAGNETS CREATE A COP=10
FREE ENERGY GAIN. HIS SYSTEM IS SHOWN HERE :

THE RAPIDLY ROTATING MAGNETIC FIELD DRAWS IN EXTRA ELECTRONS FROM THE SURROUNDING
ENVIRONMENT, AND THE RAPID SERIES OF PULSES WHICH EACH ROTOR RECEIVES ALSO DRAWS
ENERGY FROM THE GRAVITY FIELD. THE REALLY BIG GAINS ARE GOT WHEN ONE MOTOR DRIVES
SEVERAL GENERATORS :

THE ROWS OF MAGNETS ARE ANGLED IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS ON EACH ROTOR SO THAT THEY
MATCH PERFECTLY, MAGNET ON MAGNET IN EVERY ROW :
WHILE THE MAGNETS ARE EXPENSIVE, THIS IS A VERY SIMPLE WAY TO ACCESS FREE ENERGY.
THE THREE KILOWATT EARTH BATTERY

WE AUTOMATICALLY THINK OF NEW HIGH-TECH DESIGNS BEING NEEDED FOR ACHIEVING HIGH
LEVELS OF USABLE POWER NOT CONNECTED TO THE MAINS SUPPLY GRID, BUT THAT IS NOT
ALWAYS THE CASE. HERE IS A DESIGN WHICH IS LOW-TECH BUT YET IS VERY EFFECTIVE, IT COMES
FROM FRENCHMAN MICHAEL EMME IN HIS 1893 PATENT :

EACH ELEMENT IS BURIED IN ITS OWN PREPARED BODY OF EARTH AND PROVIDED THAT THE GAP
BETWEEN THE ELEMENTS IS MUCH SMALLER THAN BETWEEN SEPARATE CHAINS OF ELEMENTS
ONE PIECE OF GROUND CAN ACCOMMODATE MANY CHAINS WHICH CAN THEN BE CONNECTED IN
SERIES FOR GREATER VOLTAGE OR IN PARALLEL FOR GREATED CURRENT.

THE GROUND AROUND THE STEEL AND CARBON ROD ELECTRODES IS SATURATED WITH A
SOLUTION WHICH IS RICH IN OXYGEN, CHLORINE, BROMINE, IODINE OR FLUORINE OR WITH A SALT
OF AN ALKALI.
IF THE STEEL ELECTRODES ARE REPLACED WITH MAGNESIUM THE RESULT IS EXCELLENT WITH
EACH CELL PRODUCING 2.25 VOLTS.

WITH 12 VOLTS OR 24 VOLTS BEING THE DESIRED TARGET VOLTAGE, A POWERFUL INVERTER CAN
OPERATE HEAVY LOAD HOUSEHOLD EQUIPMENT SUCH AS A WASHING MACHINE OR TUMBLE
DRYER.

THE GROUND AROUND THE ELECTRODES NEEDS TO BE KEPT WET BY OCCASIONAL ADDITIONAL
AMOUNTS OF ELECTROLYTE.
IT IS PERFECTLY POSSIBLE TO DRAW ENERGY FROM AN AERIAL / EARTH COMBINATION. YOU DON’T
WANT TO HAVE A TUNED CIRCUIT LIKE A RADIO RECEIVER AS THAT RESTRICTS THE POWER TO
LESS THAN THAT OF A RADIO STATION. INSTEAD, YOU WANT A WIDEBAND RECEPTION WHICH
PULLS IN POWER FROM THE SUN-CHARGED IONOSPHERE AND FROM THE 200 LIGHTNING STRIKES
PER SECOND AROUND THE WORLD. THERE ARE MANY EXCELLENT DESIGNS FROM DEVELOPERS
SUCH AS JES ASCANIUS, ALEXKOR AND DRAGAN KLJAJIC. A BASIC RECEPTION MODULE CAN BE :

JES ASCANIUS USES A SHINY, INSULATED METAL PLATE ACTS AS A GOOD RECEIVER ANTENNA:

THIS ALUMINIUM PLATE IS 800 x 600 x 2 mm AND IS SUSPENDED INSIDE THE ATTIC WHERE JES LIVES.
HE BUILT HIS RECTIFIER MODULES USING SALVAGED PARTS WHICH IS WHY HIS CAPACITORS ARE
SO VERY LARGE.

THE RECEPTION MODULES “M” ARE IDEALLY CONNECTED HALF WAY BETWEEN THE AERIAL AND
THE EARTH AND THEY CAN BE ADDED LIKE THIS :
GERMANIUM DIODES ARE NORMALLY USED AND THE BASIC RECEPTION MODULE CAN BE IMPROVED
LIKE THIS :

THIS ARRANGEMENT DOUBLES THE OUTPUT FOR EACH MODULE. DRAGAN PUT 100 OF THE
ORIGINAL MODULES TOGETHER ON TWO BOARDS LIKE THIS AND GOT 100 WATTS OUTPUT FROM
THEM :
THE ALEXKOR AERIAL SYSTEM

ALEXKOR ALSO USES AN AERIAL TOCHARGE BATTERIES IN THE 1.5-VOLT TO 6-VOLT RANGE. HIS
AERIAL IS MAINLY HORIZONTAL :

THE LONGER THE AERIAL OR THE GREATER THE NUMBER OF AERIALS USED, THE GREATER THE
RATE OF CHARGING. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THE AERIAL IS CONNECTED BETWEEN THE EAVES OF
A HOUSE AND A NEARBY TREE. THE ARRIAL WIRE SHOULD BE 0,5 mm DIAMETER OR THICKER AND
IT NEEDS TO BE INSULATED FROM ITS SUPPORTS – PLASTIC CORD CAN BE USED FOR THAT.

A MORE POWERFUL VERSION OF HIS CIRCUIT WHICH CAN CHARGE 12-VOLT BATTERIES IS :

WITH A GOOD AERIAL, THE VOLTAGE ON CAPACITOR “C1” BUILDS UP UNTIL THE VOLTAGE AT POINT
“B” GETS SO HIGH THAT THE NEON FIRES, DUMPING THE CHARGE ON CAPACITOR “C1” INTO THE
BATTERY, CHARGING IT.
HOWEVER, LAWRENCE RAYBURN OF CANADA DEVELOPED A MUCH MORE POWERFUL AERIAL
SYSTEM WHICH HE CALLS THE “TREC”. IT GATHERS 10 KILOWATTS OF POWER AND WITH THAT
LEVEL OF POWER FLOWING IN THE CIRCUIT, IT IS POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE
NOT FAMILIAR WITH WORKING WITH HIGH-POWER HIGH-VOLTAGE CIRCUITS.

THIS AERIAL SYSTEM HAS TWO FOUR-FOOT (1220 mm) DIAMETER ARCHAMEDIAN SPIRALS MADE
FROM 0.75 INCH DIAMETER SOFT COPPER PIPE. EACH SPIRAL IS SANDWICHED BETWEEN TWO
SHEETS OF “LEXAN” PLASTIC AND THEY ARE MOUNTED THIRTY FEET APART VERTICALLY.

THE OBJECTIVE IS TO CREATE A TUNED PATH TO THE IONOSPHERE AND SO DRAW DOWN SOME OF
THE MASSIVE AMOUNT OF EXCESS POWER THERE. THERE IS A SPARK GAP AND MULTIPLE TUNING
COILS AND VOLTAGES OF 600 VOLTS GET GENERATED IN THE CIRCUIT BEFORE THE OUTPUT IS
ADJUSTED TO WHAT IS CONVENIENT.

A SUBSTANTIAL EARTHING PLATE OF AT LEAST SIXTEEN SQUARE FEET IS NEEDED AND WIRE
WHICH IS ABLE TO CARRY SERIOUS LOADS HAS TO BE USED. A SIGNAL GENERATOR IS USED TO
MODULATE THE POWER AND GIVE THE DESIRED MAINS FREQUENCY. THE CIRCUIT IS LIKE THIS :

THIS CIRCUIT IS HIGH POWER AND IT COULD KILL YOU, JUST AS YOUR MAINS WALL SOCKET CAN
KILL YOU.
AERIAL SYSTEMS ARE PASSIVE, GENERALLY NEEDING NO FORM OF USER-SUPPLIED INPUT POWER.
THE SAME APPLIES TO A RANGE OF ORGONE DEVICES SUCH AS THE FAMOUS “JOE CELL” NAMED
AFTER JOE NOBEL OF AUSTRALIA WHO, WITH GRAHAM COE AND PETER STEVENS POPULARISED
THE DEVICE IN 1992. JOE NOBEL DID NOT INVENT THE DEVICE AS HE WAS WORKING FROM AN
EARLIER PATENT. ORGONE DEVICES ARE STRONGLY AFFECTED BY PEOPLE NEAR THEM. A JOE
CELL CAN RUN AN ENGINE WITHOUT THE NEED FOR FUEL AS IT CONCENTRATES OUR
SURROUNDING ENERGY FIELD AND FEEDS IT INTO THE ENGINE. BILL WILLIAMS OF AMERICA HAS
RUN HIS FORD PICK-UP TRUCK FOR MANY MILES WITHOUT NEEDING ANY FORM OF ‘FUEL' :

JOE NOBEL WAS EXPERIMENTING AND USING STAINLESS STEEL COMPONENTS AVAILABLE AT A
LOCAL FACTORY. TODAY, IF YOU WANT TO BUILD A JOE CELL, THEN PLEASE USE THE SPECIFIC
DIMENTIONS SHOWN BELOW.

THE JOE CELL USES WATER (PROBABLY THE MOST COMPLEX SUBSTANCE ON THE PLANET) AND
WITH JOE’S INCORRECT DIMENSIONS IT TAKES A GREAT DEAL OF EFFORT TO GET THE WATER TO
THE CORRECT STATE. WITH THE CORRECT DIMENTIONS, TAP WATER GOES IMMEDIATELY TO THE
CORRECT STATE.

THE CONTAINER MATERIAL IS ALWAYS STAINLESS STEEL AND THE ENGINE OF ANY VEHICLE TO BE
USED WITH IT CAN TAKE A WEEK TO GET ALIGNED TO THE ENERGY FLOW. SUITABLE DIMENSIONS
ARE :
BASED ON JOE CELL TECHNOLOGY, THERE IS A SIMPLE DEVICE WHICH IS THREE CONCENTRICALLY
WOUND “TORSION FIELD” COILS, WOUND WITH 2 mm DIAMETER WIRE AND PLACED ON A NON-
FERROUS PIPE :

THIS COIL SET IS CONNECTED BETWEEN THE ENGINE CHASSIS AND A WIRE WHICH GOES DOWN
INTO THE OIL. DETAILS ARE IN CHAPTER 9 OF THE EBOOK WHERE WIRE LENGTHS ARE GIVEN.

THE CONTRIBUTER OF THIS INFORMATION WAS GETTING A 20% IMPROVEMENT IN HIS CAR’S MPG
PERFORMANCE BUT IT IS QUITE POSSIBLE THAT THIS COIL ARRANGEMENT CAN RUN A CAR
WITHOUT ANY FUEL BEING NEEDED. DEVELOPMENT IS CONTINUING.
ZACH WEST IN AMERICA HAS RUN A 250 cc MOTORCYCLE WITHOUT USING PETROL. HE PERFORMS
ELECTROLYSIS OF WATER USING HIS HOME-BUILT ELECTROLYSER. HE THEN BLEEDS OFF MOST OF
THE OXYGEN, MAKING THE GAS FAR LESS VOLATILE AND HE STORES SOME IN A TANK READY FOR
INCREASES IN LOAD SUCH AS ACCELERATING AWAY FROM TRAFFIC LIGHTS. HIS SYSTEM IS LIKE
THIS :

ZACH’S ELECTROLYSIS IS CARRIED OUT IN A SERIES OF THESE INDIVIDUAL UNITS :

THESE UNITS ARE CONNECTED IN PAIRS AND FED WITH PULSED DC :

ZACH CONNECTS HIS ELECTROLYSER CELLS IN PAIRS LIKE THIS :

AND HIS 30-AMP COMMERCIAL PULSER LOOKS LIKE THIS :

AND THE GAS RESERVOIR IS CONSTRUCTED LIKE THIS :

ZACH’S OVERALL SYSTEM IS BASICALLY VERY SIMPLE:

IT IS PROBABLE THAT THIS SYSTEM WHICH CAN POWER A MOTORCYCLE, IS NOT SELF-POWERED AS
MOTORCYCLE ELECTRIC SYSTEMS ARE GENERALLY VERY LOW PERFORMANCE. HOWEVER, IF AN
ADDITIONAL BATTERY IS CARRIED, THE SYSTEM CAN BE KEPT GOING BY CHARGING THE
BATTERIES USING A SOLAR PANEL, MAKING THE MOTORCYCLE EFFECTIVELY A SOLAR POWERED
VEHICLE AND ESSENTIALLY, FUEL-LESS IN OPERATION.
IT IS ALSO QUITE POSSIBLE TO SELF-RUN PORTABLE GENERATORS WITH WATER APPEARING TO BE
THE ONLY FUEL. THIS CAN BE DONE IN TWO DIFFERENT WAYS WHEN YOU POWER AN
ELECTROLYSER WITH PART OF THE ELECTRICAL OUTPUT FROM THE GENERATOR.

1. YOU CAN DELAY THE SPARK TIMING TO ALLOW FOR THE FACT THAT HHO IGNITES A THOUSAND
TIMES FASTER THAN PETROL (AND SO THE SPARK MUST COME LATER). YOU ALSO ADD COLD
WATER MIST BECAUSE THAT TURNS INTO FLASH-STEAM INSIDE THE CYLINDER AND MAKES THE
GENERATOR OPERATE AS AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION STEAM ENGINE.

OR

2. YOU BUBBLE THE HHO THROUGH ACETONE SO THAT THE SPARK TIMING DOES NOT NEED TO BE
ALTERED, AND ADD COLD WATER MIST AS BEFORE.

THE OVERALL CONCEPT IS LIKE THIS :

ALTHOUGH THIS LOOKS SIMPLE, IT IS CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING KILOWATTS OF EXCESS

ELECTRICITY WHERE THERE IS NO ELECTRICAL GRID. A SIMPLE VENTURI TUBE CAN PRODUCE THE
DESIRED COLD WATER MIST :
IN MORE DETAIL, THE SYSTEM LOOKS LIKE THIS :

AND IF IT IS A STATIONARY SYSTEM, THEN IT WILL END UP LIKE THIS :

THE EBOOK HAS DETAILED INFORMATION ON THIS WITH SELWYN HARRIS OF AUSTRALIA SHOWING
HOW TO ALTER THE TIMING OF A GENERATOR AND DAVID QUIREY OF NEW ZEALAND SHOWING HIS
UNMODIFIED GENERATOR RUNNING ON WATER. YOU CAN MAKE YOUR OWN ELECTROLYSER IF YOU
WISH AND ALL OF THE RELEVANT INFORMATION IS IN www.free-energy-info.com/PJKbook.pdf
CHAPTER 10. BUT IN BRIEF OUTLINE, A PROPERLY BUILT ELECTROLYSER WILL HAVE MORE THAN
TWICE THE EFFICIENCY THAT MICHAEL FARADAY ACHIEVED. IN PRACTICAL TERMS, IF YOU PLACE
TWO ELECTRODES IN A BODY OF WATER, AND APPLY 12-VOLTS ACROSS THEM, THEN ONLY 1.24
VOLTS WILL BE USED IN DC ELECTROLYSIS AND THE REMAINDER OF THE POWER JUST GOES TO
HEAT THE WATER :

SO, FOR MAXIMUM EFFICIENCY DC ELECTROLYSIS, YOU USE SIX CELLS IN SERIES FOR 12-VOLTS OR
SEVEN CELLS FOR THE 14-VOLTS PRODUCED BY A CAR’S ALTERNATOR :
A SUPER HIGH EFFICIENCY ELECTROLYSER OF THE TYPE DESIGNED BY BOB BOYCE OF AMERICA
CAN GENERATE UP TO 100 LITRES OF HHO PER MINUTE (1200% FARADAY’S EFFICIENCY) BUT HAS
TO BE PULSED AT RESONANT FREQUENCY WHICH IS NOT EASY :

(FULL CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS ARE IN THE PJKbook.pdf DOCUMENT) BUT FORTUNATELY, A WELL
MADE DC ELECTROLYSER IS SUFFICIENCT FOR RUNNING A GENERATOR ON WATER ALONE AS THE
GENERATOR PRODUCES KILOWATTS OF ELECTRICAL POWER AND THAT MEANS THAT THERE IS
PLENTY OF ELECTRICAL POWER AVAILABLE FOR THE ELECTROLYSIS. THE ELECTROLYTE IS 28%
BY WEIGHT OF POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE (KOH) IN DISTILLED WATER AND GRADE 316 STAINLESS
STEEL ELECTRODES ARE USED FOR ALL ELECTROLYSIS (AFTER CROSSHATCH SCORING AND
PLATE CONDITIONING BEFORE USE).

AS SELWYN HARRIS OF AUSTRALIA POINTS OUT, IT IS NOT ALL THAT DIFFICULT TO ALTER THE
TIMING OF A SMALL GENERATOR AND HE PROVIDES INSTRUCTIONS WITH PHOTOGRAPHS TO SHOW
EXACTLY HOW :
AN IMPORTANT NON-FREE ENERGY DEVICE IS THE ELMER GRIMES 1961 PATENTED DESIGN FOR
LARGE SCALE EXTRACTION OF WATER FROM AIR (US 2,996,897). THIS IS SO EFFECTIVE THAT IT CAN
BE USED IN DESERTS AND ONE HAS SUPPLIED A WHOLE RANCH IN TEXAS IN A DRY YEAR.

ESSENTIALLY, IT IS A REFRIGERATOR WHICH CHILLS A METAL CONE WHICH HAS A CAR STYLE
WINDSCREEN WIPER TO KEEP PUSHING THE CONDENSED WATER OFF THE CONE. FOR EFFICIENCY,
SEVERAL CONES ARE STACKED IN A VERTICAL POSITION. SEEN FROM THE TOP IT LOOKS LIKE
THIS :

THIS WATER-MAKING SYSTEM COULD BE POWERED BY ONE OF THE FREE-ENERGY DEVICES, SAY,
THE CHAS CAMPBELL GENERATOR.
IT IS PERFECTLY POSSIBLE TO RUN A VEHICLE ON SOLID FUEL SUCH AS WOOD-CHIPS OR COKE.

THIS WAS DONE EXTENSIVELY DURING WORLD WAR TWO WHEN PETROL WAS IN SHORT SUPPLY.
THIS CAN BE DONE BY BURNING THE SOLID FUEL IN INSUFFICIENT AIR, PRODUCING HYDROGEN,
CARBON MONOXIDE AND METHANE ALL OF WHICH CAN BE BURNT IN AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION
ENGINE :

HOWEVER, THIS IS A POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS ARRANGEMENT WHEN FUELLING IS NEEDED, DUE

TO THE CARBON MONOXIDE BEING PRODUCED (AS CARBON MONOXIDE BINDS WITH HAEMAGLOBIN)
SO A MORE CONVENIENT SIMPLE ALTERNATIVE TO PETROL OR DIESEL IS TO BE PREFERRED.

ALL OF THE NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION, USE AND MAINTENANCE DETAILS ARE IN THE APPENDIX
OF MY EBOOK PJKbook.pdf ALONG WITH DIAGRAMS AND PHOTOGRAPHS :
THE HOMOPOLAR OR N-MACHINE OF MICHAEL FARADAY (1831) HAS THE PROBLEM OF VERY LOW
DC OUTPUT VOLTAGE OF LESS THAN ONE VOLT, ALTHOUGH THE OUTPUT CURRENT CAN BE UP TO
1000 AMPS. THAT COMBINATION SUITS SIMPLE ELECTROLYSIS BUT LITTLE ELSE. FARADAY’S
ARRANGEMENT WAS :

WITH THIS ARRANGEMENT, A COPPER DISC IS ROTATED IN A MAGNETIC FIELD AND THAT CAUSES A
VOLTAGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE AXLE AND THE OUTER EDGE OF THE DISC. THIS
ARRANGEMENT ALSO WORKS IF THE MAGNET IS ATTACHED TO THE COPPER DISC AND ROTATES
WITH IT.

THE MAIN PROBLEM IS THAT IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO PROVIDE A RELIABLE ELECTRICITY TAKE OFF
CONTACT FOR THE DISC. HOWEVER, IN 1987, THREE OF THE BORDERLAND SCIENCE TEAM,
MICHAEL KNOW, PETER LINDEMANN AND CHRIS CARSON DISCOVERED A VERSION WHICH
PRODUCED SAWTOOTH AC OUTPUT. AN AC OUTPUT ALLOWS A STEP-UP TRANSFORMER TO BE
USED, RAISING THE OUTPUT VOLTAGE AND LOWERING THE OUTPUT CURRENT.

THEIR DESIGN HAS FOUR FERRITE PERMANENT MAGNETS GLUED BETWEEN TWO METAL DISCS AND
FOR ADDITIONAL MECHANICAL STRENGTH, COPPER WIRE WAS WOUND AROUND THE OUTER EDGES
OF THE MAGNETS AGAINST FAILURE OF THE GLUE BOND. THE CONSTRUCTION LOOKS LIKE THIS :

THE OUTPUT CURRENT WAS ESTIMATED AT 100 AMPS. THE OUTPUT VOLTAGE WAS NOT AFFECTED
BY THE SPEED OF ROTATION BUT THE FREQUENCY OF THE OUTPUT AC WAS. IT SEEMS IMPOSSIBLE
THAT THERE SHOULD BE A VOLTAGE DIFFERENCE ACROSS THE DIRECT SHORT-CIRCUIT ACROSS A
SHORT SECTION OF COPPER DISC, BUT THAT JUST DEMONSTRATES OUR LACK OF KNOWLEDGE.

A SPINNING COPPER CYLINDER EXERTS A LARGE SIDEWAYS FORCE ON A PERMANENT MAGNET

PLACED NEAR IT. THIS DOES NOT HAPPEN WITH CYLINDERS MADE FROM OTHER METALS.
THE VICTOR DIDUCK PERMANENT MAGNET MOTOR.

POWERFUL PERMANENT MAGNET MOTORS ARE VERY DIFFICULT TO BUILD AND GET OPERATIONAL.
GENERALLY SPEAKING THERE IS NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION TO GET AN IMMEDIATELY WORKING
MOTOR, NOT NECESSARILY BECAUSE THE INVENTOR DOES NOT WANT YOU TO BUT GENERALLY
BECAUSE ALL MAGNETS ARE DIFFERENT AND CONSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS MATTER A GREAT
DEAL. HOWEVER, THE DIDUCK MOTOR APPEARS TO BE POWERFUL AND HAVE ENOUGH SPECIFIC
INFORMATION TO GET YOUR REPLICATION WORKING SATISFACTORILY.
A VERY INTERESTING FEATURE IS THE USE OF FERROMAGNETIC BOLTS ‘603’ AND THEIR EXACT
POSITIONING TO ELIMINATE MAGNETIC ‘DEAD’ SPOTS, ALONG WITH THE EXACT MAGNET POSITIONS
IN THE ROTOR :
THE SELF-CHARGING BATTERY CHARGER. THIS IS A BASIC STARTER-LEVEL JOHN BEDINI STYLE
BATTERY CHARGER WITH ONE SMALL ADDITION TO MAKE IT SELF-POWERED.

MOST BATTERY CHARGERS HAVE THE PROBLEM THAT THEY RUN THEIR DRIVE BATTERY DOWN
WHEN THEY OPERATE. USUALLY, THE BATTERY BEING CHARGED HAS TO BE AT A DIFFERENT
VOLTAGE LEVEL IN ORDER TO AVOID DRAINING THE DRIVE BATTERY DIRECTLY INTO THE BATTERY
BEING CHARGED INSTEAD OF POWERING THE CHARGING CIRCUIT (JOHN BEDINI’S SIMPLE
SCHOOLGIRL CHARGER BEING AN EXAMPLE OF THAT). THE FOLLOWING BATTERY CHARGER
MANAGES TO CHARGE ITS OWN BATTERY AS IT GOES ALONG :

THIS CIRCUIT IS SUBTLE. THE CIRCUIT ON THE LEFT FEEDS PULSES INTO THE BATTERY UNDER
CHARGE FIVE TIMES PER REVOLUTION IN THE SAME WAY AS A BEDINI CIRCUIT. HOWEVER, ONCE
PER REVOLUTION THE MICROSWITCH DUMPS CHARGE FROM ONE MAGNET PASSING THE BLUE
PICK-UP COIL ON THE RIGHT, STRAIGHT INTO THE DRIVE BATTERY, MAINTAINING ITS CHARGE. THE
MICROSWITCH LOOKS LIKE THIS:

IT IS PROBABLY EASIER TO UNDERSTAND THE CIRCUIT IF THE TWO PARTS ARE SHOWN
SEPARATELY:
BECAUSE THE PICK-UP COILS ARE ALIGNED AND THERE IS AN ODD NUMBER OF ROTOR MAGNETS,
THE PULSES FROM THE TWO COILS ARE ALWAYS AT DIFFERENT TIMES:

CONSEQUENTLY, THE TWO PARTS OF THE CIRCUIT OPERATE INDEPENDENTLY AND SO THE
MECHANICAL SWITCH CAN SELECT BETWEEN THEM.

ADDITIONAL OUTPUT COILS CAN BE POSITIONED AT 72-DEGREE ANGLES AROUND THE ROTOR
WHICH IS 48 mm THICK AND WEIGHING 2 KILOGRAMS, BEING CONSTRUCTED FROM LAMINATE
FLOORING MATERIAL AND HAVING A 6-INCH (150 mm) DIAMETER. THE ROTOR IS PUSHED AROUND
WHEN THE TRANSISTOR SWITCHES ON IN RESPONSE TO THE SIGNAL FROM THE TRIGGER COIL
CAUSED BY A MAGNET PASSING BY THE COIL.

HOWEVER, IT IS LIKELY THAT THE THICKNESS OF THIS PARTICULAR ROTOR WAS CAUSED BY THE
USUAL FACTOR OF WHAT WAS TO HAND AT THE TIME AND THE DESIRE TO MATCH THE SIZE OF THE
MAGNETS USED :
WHILE NOT PART OF THIS ACTUAL DESIGN, IT IS SUGGESTED BY THE RUSSIAN EXPERIMENTER
“VIKNEL” THAT A MUCH GREATER EFFECT CAN BE HAD FROM ANY SIMILAR SYSTEM IF THE STATOR
COILS ARE WOUND WITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE AND CONNECTED LIKE THIS :
ALEXKOR’S FIRST BATTERY CHARGER.

ONE READER USED TO CHARGE HIS BATTERY THROUGH A STANDARD MAINS CHARGER. HE BUILT
THIS CIRCUIT, POWERED IT WITH HIS MAINS CHARGER AND FOUND THAT HIS BATTERY CHARGED
FULLY IN HALF THE TIME. HERE IS THE CIRCUIT :

YOU WILL NOTICE THAT THIS CHARGER MATCHES THE COLD ELECTRICITY SPECIFICATIONS OF
HOWERD HALAY IN BOTH FREQUENCY AND VOLTAGE AS WITHOUT THE BATTERY BEING CHARGED
IT PRODUCES 200-VOLT PULSES AS SHOWN ON THE METER BELOW.

ALEXKOR BUILT THE CIRCUIT VERY SIMPLY :

THE CIRCUIT IS VERY EFFICIENT BECAUSE THE 555 TIMER IS SET TO VERY SHORT, VERY FAST
PULSES WHICH DRIVE THE 1.5-INCH AIR CORE COIL ONLY VERY BRIEFLY. ALEXKOR DOES NOT SAY
SO, BUT I SUGGEST THAT IT WOULD BE GOOD FOR THE OUTPUT DIODE TO BE A FAST-ACTING DIODE
SUCH AS THE UF5408 DIODE WHICH IS A 1000-VOLT 3-AMP LOW COST DIODE. THIS CIRCUIT COULD
CHARGE FOUR BATTERIES CONNECTED IN SERIES (IN A CHAIN).
VELJKO MILKOVIC DESIGNED A MECHANICAL FREE ENERGY DEVICE WITH A COP=12.

HIS DESIGN IS A COMBINATION OF LEVER AND PENDULUM :

THIS ALLOWS THE TIRING TASK OF PUMPING WATER IN A HOT CLIMATE TO BE MUCH MORE EASILY
ACCOMPLISHED BY MERELY PUSHING A PENDULUM OCCASIONALLY WITH ONE FINGER.

THE FOLLOWING PENDULUM HAD BEEN RUNNING CONTINUOUSLY FOR TWO YEARS WHEN THIS
PHOTOGRAPH WAS TAKEN :

IT GIVES ITSELF A SLIGHT ADDITIONAL PUSH ON EVERY SWING BY DROPPING A MAGNET PLATE
DOWN TO PUSH AWAY THE MAGNETS OF THE PENDULUM ‘WEIGHT’.
THE TIPPING OF THE LEVER ARM DROPS THE MAGNETIC PLATE DOWN INTO A STATIONARY SLOT
AND THE APPROACHING PENDULUM MAGNET STORES ENERGY IN THE MAGNETIC FIELD BETWEEN
THEM. THEN THAT ENERGY IS RETURNED TO THE PENDULUM AS THE PENDULUM MAGNET MOVES
AWAY AND THAT SUSTAINS THE PENDULUM SWING INDEFINITELY.
IN THE 1970s, PAVEL IMRIS PATENTED AN OPTICAL AMPLIFIER WHICH HAS A GAIN OF MORE THAN
NINE TIMES. HE ACHIEVED THAT WITH A QUARTZ ENVELOPE WHICH HAS TWO POINTED
ELECTRODES IN IT. THE QUARTZ ENVELOPE CONTAINS XENON GAS UNDER PRESSURE AND A
DIELECTRIC MATERIAL. THE HIGHER THE XENON PRESSURE, THE HIGHER THE OVERALL GAIN.

THE PATENT INCLUDES TABLES OF BENCH TEST RESULTS WHERE FLUORESCENT LAMPS WERE
TESTED AS THE LOAD. FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF ANY INDIVIDUAL LAMP, WITHOUT USING THIS
DEVICE IT REQUIRES 40 WATTS OF ELECTRICAL INPUT POWER TO GIVE 8.8 WATTS OF LIGHT OUTPUT
(THE REST BEING CONVERTED TO HEAT). THAT IS AN EFFICIENCY OF ABOUT 22%. DURING THE
BENCH TESTS EACH LAMP REQUIRED 0.9 WATTS OF INPUT POWER IN ORDER TO PRODUCE 8.8
WATTS OF LIGHT OUTPUT. THAT IS A LAMP EFFICIENCY OF MORE THAN 900% AND THE POWER
INPUT WAS ONLY 2.25% OF THE ORIGINAL 40 WATTS REQUIRED. THAT IS QUITE AN IMPRESSIVE
PERFORMANCE FOR SUCH A SIMPLE DEVICE.
DON SMITH PROMOTED THE MAGNETIC TRANSMISSION OF POWER WHICH IS PARTICULARLY
ATTRACTIVE IN THAT MANY COPIES OF THE OUTPUT POWER CAN BE TAKEN WITHOUT INCREASING
THE INPUT POWER IN ANY WAY :

HERE, THE CENTRAL COIL IS THE TRANSMITTER WITH THE PRIMARY COIL WELL UP THE SECONDARY
COIL. THE BLACK STRIPS ARE JUST INDUSTRIAL GRADE SCREW CONNECTORS. THE THREE
NEARER COILS ARE THREE IDENTICAL RECEIVER COILS AT IDENTICAL DISTANCES FROM THE
TRANSMITTER COIL. EACH RECEIVER COIL HAS A CAPACITOR AND AN ADJUSTABLE SMALL
CAPACITOR FOR EXACT TUNING. THE TRANSMITTER TESLA COIL IS DRIVEN BY A NEON TUBE
DRIVER MODULE :
THIS IS AN EXPONENTIAL SYSTEM BECAUSE THE OUTPUT IS THE SQUARE OF THE VOLTAGE AND
THE SQUARE OF THE FREQUENCY, SO, DOUBLE THE FREQUENCY AND DOUBLE THE VOLTAGE AND
THE OUTPUT INCREASES BY A FACTOR OF SIXTEEN TIMES.

IN HIS DESIGNS, DON RAISES THE FREQUENCY FROM AROUND 50 CYCLES PER SECOND TO ABOUT
35,000 CYCLES PER SECOND WHICH IS A FACTOR OF 700, GIVING AN OUTPUT POWER GAIN OF
490,000 AND HE RAISES THE VOLTAGE TO 9,000 VOLTS WHICH IS FORTY TIMES GREATER THAN THE
MAINS VOLTAGE, GIVING AN OUTPUT POWER GAIN OF 1,600 TIMES. TOGETHER, THE OUTPUT
POWER GAIN OVER THE INPUT POWER IS 784 MILLION ON EACH OUTPUT !!

THE GAP BETWEEN THE TRANSMITTING COIL AND THE RECEIVING COILS IS CHOSEN CAREFULLY AS
THAT DISTANCE HAS A MAJOR EFFECT ON THE SIGNAL RECEIVED BY THE RECEIVING COIL.
DON SMITH’S PLASMA TUBE IS ONE OF HIS MORE CONVINCING INVENTIONS :
DON WAS ACTUALLY AWARDED A PATENT FOR THIS DESIGN. ESSENTIALLY, IT IS TWO CAPACITOR
PLATES WHICH HAVE A PLASMA TUBE INSERTED THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THEM. THE UPPER
PLATE IS ALUMINIUM AND THE LOWER PLATE IS COPPER AND THEY ARE SEPARATED BY A SHEET
OF PLASTIC. HIS PATENT SAYS :

THE PRODUCTION MODEL HAS 21 PLATES AND 20 INSULATOR LAYERS:

THE ”TESLA” SWITCH PATENT BY CARLOS BENITEZ :

THE TESLA SWITCH WAS MADE FAMOUS BY THE STAFF OF ELECTRODYNE CORP. WHO BUILT AND
TESTED IT FOR THREE YEARS (ALTHOUGH ELECTRODYNE CORPORATION DENIES THAT FACT).
THEIR CIRCUIT, WHICH USES 36-VOLT CONDITIONED “12-VOLT” BATTERIES WAS :

OR WITH MECHANICAL SWITCHING :

THE SWITCHING BEING ACHIEVED BY A MOTOR DRIVEN ROTARY 6-SWITCH ARRANGEMENT :

WITH SWITCHING SPEEDS OF 100 TO 800 SWITCHES PER SECOND, THE OUTPUT WAS QUITE
REMARKABLE WITH A 30 HORSEPOWER OUTPUT, CAR BATTERIES WHICH CHARGED HAPPILY TO
36-VOLTS EVENTUALLY AND FULLY DISCHARGED BATTERIES WHICH RECHARGED FULLY IN JUST
ONE MINUTE.

IF MECHANICAL SWITCHING IS TO BE USED, THEN PERHAPS THIS STYLE OF CONSTRUCTION WOULD

SUIT :
THE SYSTEM OPERATES BY PUTTING THE BATTERIES REPEATEDLY IN SERIES AND THEN IN
PARALLEL, SO THAT THE SERIES BATTERIES CHARGE THE PARALLEL BATTERIES :

THE LOAD SHOULD BE AND INDUCTIVE LOAD SUCH AS A MOTOR, AND THE DIODES USED SHOULD
BE THE 1N1183 AS THEY BREAK DOWN WHEN REVERSED BIASED, FEEDING A SHARP VOLTAGE
PULSE TO THE BATTERIES. THE SWITCHING SPEED NEEDS TO BE FAST FOR THIS CIRCUIT TO
OPERATE SELF-POWERED.

CARLOS BENITEZ’S 1916 CIRCUIT HAS NO DIODES BUT IT DOES HAVE AN INDUCTION COIL
GENERATOR IN ADDITION TO THE BATTERY SWITCHING :

CARLOS ALSO PATENTED A 2-KILOWATT GENERATOR WHICH RUNS OFF A BATTERY AND CHARGES
AN IDENTICAL BATTERY WHILE IT DOES SO AND THAT PROVIDES 2 kW OF CONTINUOUS FREE
ELECTRICAL SUPPLY.
THE ECKLIN-BROWN MAGNETIC GENERATOR IS AN INTERESTING CONCEPT. IT PRODUCES AN
ALTERNATING MAGNETIC FIELD BY USING A ROTATING MAGNETIC SHIELD :

IN THE ILLUSTRATION ABOVE, THE RED ARM OF THE MAGNETIC SHIELD REDUCES THE STRENGTH
OF THE HORSESHOE MAGNET ON THE LEFT AND SO THE MAGNET ON THE RIGHT INFLUENCES THE
I-SHAPED CENTRAL SECTION WITH ITS OUTPUT COILS. WHEN THE SHIELD ROTATES THROUGH
90-DEGREES, THE BLUE ARM BLOCKS OFF THE RIGHT HAND MAGNET AND CLEARS THE LEFT HAND
MAGNET, REVERSING THE MAGNETIC SITUATION.

MAGNETIC SHIELDING MATERIAL IS GENERALLY THOUGHT TO BE MU-METAL WHICH IS A VARIETY

OF STAINLESS STEEL. ECKLIN USED INSULATED LAYERS OF IRON. THICK ALUMINIUM SHOULD
ALSO BE SUITABLE ALTHOUGH IT IS NOT AT ALL EASY TO BLOCK MAGNETISM.

I SUGGEST THAT THE BASIC WELL-KNOWN ECKLIN-BROWN ARRANGEMENT CAN BE UPGRADED A

BIT:

THERE COULD BE TWO COILS :

OR THERE COULD BE FOUR COILS :

OR THERE COULD BE EIGHT COILS :

MUCH MORE DETAIL ON ALL OF THE DEVICES MENTIONED IN THIS SUMMARY IS IN THE FREE
DOWNLOAD : www.free-energy-info.com/PJKbook.pdf
 FREE-ENERGY COILS ARE OFTEN WOUND USING ENAMELLED COPPER WIRE,
AVAILABLE FROM SUPPLIERS SUCH AS https://www.scientificwire.com/acatalog/ec-wire.html
OR https://www.esr.co.uk/electronics/products/frame_cable.htm (£3.50 POSTAGE) AND THE
“SOLDERABLE” VERSION ALLOWS SOLDERED JOINTS TO BE MADE WITHOUT CLEANING THE
ENAMEL OFF THE WIRE AS THE PAINT JUST BURNS AWAY AT SOLDERING TEMPERATURES.

NEODYMIUM MAGNETS AND GENERAL ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS CAN BE FOUND ON eBay :

 Method
1. Using an aerial
2. Gravity
3. A spinning rotor
4. Motionless circuit
5. Efficient magnetic transfer
6. Efficient electrolysis for
heating and powering
generators
7. Effective battery charging
8. Permanent magnets only
9. Permanent magnets with
electricity
10. Passive devices
11. Inertia
12. Ground energy
13. Radioactive
14. Isotope exchange
15. Splitting the Positive
16. Magnetic Coupling
17. Inert-gas motors
18. Optical amplification
19. Friction
20. Piezo electricity
Examples
Alexkor’s aerial 100 watts, chapter 7
Lawrence Rayburn’s TREC aerial 10 kilowatts, chapter 7
Thomas Henry Moray demonstrations up to 50 kilowatts, chapter 7
William Skinner – powered his workshop in 1939, chapter 4
James Kwok 100 to 1000 kilowatts, chapter 4
Mikhail Dmitriev's pushed weights, 100 watts, chapter 4
Teruo Kawai self-powered electric motor cycle, chapter 2
Robert Adams kilowatts, chapter 2
Carlos Benitez 2 kilowatts, chapter 5
Lawrence Tseung’s magnetic frame 100 watts, chapter 3
Valeri Ivanov’s magnetic frame 100 watts, chapter 3
Rosemary Ainslie’s heater 100 watts, chapter 5
Thane Heins' 100 watts, chapter 3
Tewari Paramahamsa's 20 kilowatts, chapter 2
Clemente Figuera's 20 kilowatt transformer, chapter 3
Dave Lawton, chapter 10
Dr Scott Cramton, chapter 10
Bob Boyce, chapter 10
Selwyn Harris, chapter 10
David Quirey unmodified generator, chapter 10
Motionless: Lawrence Tseung’s FLEET, chapter 5
Alexkor’s many systems, chapter 6
Moving: John Bedini / Ron Pugh, chapter 6
Muammer Yildiz’s motor, 300-watts, chapter 1
Dietmar Hohl’s motor, 100 watts, chapter 1
Howard Johnston’s motor, 1 kilowatt, chapter 1
ShenHe Wang’s generators, 1 to 100 kilowatts, chapter 1
Mini Romag / J L Naudin generator, 35 watts, chapter 13
Robert Adams’ generator, multi kilowatt, chapter 2
Charles Flynn’s motor, unlimited, chapter 1
Steven Kundel’s motor, 100 watts, chapter 1
Donald Kelly’s motor, 100 watts, chapter 1
Dr Oleg Gritschevitch's Toroid 1500 kilowatts, chapter 5
Bill Williams/Joe Nobel’s Joe Cell, unlimited, chapter 9
John Bedini’s pulsed flywheel, chapter 4
James Hardy’s water-jet generator, chapter 2
Chas Campbell’s self-powered flywheel, chapter 4
Barbosa and Leal 169 kilowatts, COP=102.4, chapter 3
Frank Prentice 3 kilowatts, COP=6, chapter 5
Michael Emme’s Earth Battery, 3 kilowatts, chapter 6
Colman / Seddon-Gillespie’s 1 kilowatt, 70-year battery, chapter 3
Tesla’s generator (spark gap alternative), unlimited, chapter 11
Meyer and Mace using isotopes of iron, 1 kilowatt, chapter 3
Clemente Figuera’s 5 kilowatt generator (avoids back-EMF), chapter 3
Raoul Hatem’s multi-generator system, unlimited, chapter 2
Josef Papp (Volvo 90 HP engine @300 HP 40 min. demo), chapter 8
Robert Britt, unlimited, chapter 8.
Pavel Imris’ optical amplifier, multiplier of 9 times, unlimited, chapter 3
Paul Baumann’s Thestatika (Wimshurst machine), 3 kilowatts, chapter 13
Michael Ognyanov’s semiconductor battery, 10 watts, appendix
Not included in this list:

Andrea Rossi’s Cold fusion, 1 kilowatt modules,

Floyd Sweet’s motionless magnetic system (COP=1,500,000 at 500 watts),
Steven Mark’s self-powered toroid, hundreds of watts,
Tariel Kapanadze’s 1 kilowatt to 100 kilowatt generators,
Don Smith’s high kilowatt designs,
Alfred Hubbard’s 35 HP engine,
Richard Clem’s 300 HP self-powered engine,
John Searle’s power generator,
Dan Cook’s self-powered motionless generator,
Joseph Newman’s motor
and many others.