Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT
In lieu of the oral testimony in court of CPL JULIUS F. DELA CRUZ,
the plaintiff of this case, his Judicial Affidavit is being offered pursuant to
A.M. 12-8-8-SC, known as the Judicial Affidavit Rule, for the Following
purposes, THUS:
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
I, CPL Julius F. Dela Cruz, Filipino, of legal age, single and a resident
of Barangay Centro East, Santiago City, Philippines, one of the arresting
officer in the above case, state under oath as follows:
1
I am executing this Judicial Affidavit in Tagalog and was translated to
English in which I also understand.
OFFER OF TESTIMONY
This Affidavit is being offered to prove that the Accused, Reneboy C.
Dalisay, is guilty of the crime being charged.
2
Aurora Street, Victory Norte, Santiago City alleging that they were
frequently passed to and fro by a motorcycle riding in tandem. We
then immediately proceeded to the area and were able to intercept an
individual in his motorcycle and subject him for questioning. I
requested him to raise his shirt and bring out the contents of his
pocket which the person willfully complied.
9. Q: What was the result of the lab analysis of the seized evidence by
the Santiago City Crime Laboratory?
A: The Santiago City Crime Laboratory per Crime Lab Analysis Report
No. 2013-02-123 dated January 23, 2013 confirmed that the seized
evidence was positive for Methamphetamine also known as “shabu”.
10. Q: I will again be marking the Crime Laboratory Analysis Report No.
2013-02-123 issued by Santiago City Crime Laboratory as Exhibit
“B”, do you agree?
A: Yes sir
3
A: After gathering the needed documents and evidence we
immediately subject the accused for inquest proceeding to Santiago
City Prosecutor Office for proper filing of information.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of March
2019, at Centro East, Santiago City, Philippines.
4
MANIFESTATION
May I request this Honorable Court a few words to ponder in the act of the
defendant by mere hiding these past years constitutes an abuse of
confidence over my client. The mere fact that he did not show even with
numerous attempt from my client for him to settle his obligation shows that
the trust entrusted by my client over him was violated.
ATTESTATION CLAUSE