Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Container/s (big and small) - used to hold the soil sample for the experiment
Sieve - used to separate the wanted particle sizes to be oven dried in this experiment
Thongs - used in handling the containers after oven drying the samples to avoid injury
Brush - used to get rid of unwanted materials in the containers and sieve
Sampling Spoon - used to scoop up the soil sample into the container
Materials/Equipment:
Balance - used in measuring the soil sample before and after oven drying
Desiccator - are sealable enclosures containing desiccants used for preserving moisture-
sensitive sample, but we did not really use this because we weighed the soil immediately
Pictures during Experiment:
Equation:
Where:
ML = moisture loss
Trial 1:
ML = 𝑊1 − 𝑊2
ML = 94.16 g - 90.85 g
ML = 3.31 g
(94.16−67.07)−(90.85−67.07)
𝑤= 𝑥 100%
(90.85−67.07)
w = 15.197 %
Results and Discussions:
As seen on the results of our experiment, the oven-drying of the soil sample
made it lose its moisture content, thus making it lighter compared to the initial soil sample.
The water present on a given quantity of soil known as water content “w” is defined as the
ratio, expressed as a percentage of the weight of water in a given soil mass to the weight of
solid particles. For man soils, the water content may be an extremely important index used
for establishing the relationship between the soils behaves and its properties. The consistency
of a fine-grained soil largely depends on its water content. The water content is also used in
expressing the relationships of air, water, and solid in a given volume of soil.
which is what we have done in this experiment. We all used the same type of soil and oven
dried it to the same oven with a temperature control to avoid variance in the results of each
group. However we can do this experiment without the use of the oven but it would take
much longer and is normally dried within 24 hours so that you can achieve more accurate
result.
Conclusion:
Based from the results of our experiment, we got inconsistent average water
content from each of our soil sample particles because the soil samples water content goes
from 12% to 15% and then back to 12% again respective of their particle size from sieves 3/8
to 4, and 10. But when you look at Trial 1 of our experiment, we achieved a rather conclusive
result which denotes that the finer soil particles have less water content, and this is contrary
to what I’ve learned because finer soils tend to retain more water. The error in our result may
be due to the improper sieving of the soil or it can also be because the representative soil
1. Why is it not recommended to leave an oven-dried sample in the open air for a long time
Because it might absorb the moisture in the air when you leave it in the open air for a
2. Excluding oven drying, are there other methods to determine the water content of soils?
There are many alternative methods in determining soils water content and a notable
one is the sand bath method because it used in fields where there no lab equipment
available. Other methods include Alcohol Method, Infrared Lamp Torsion Balance
Yes, you can do so by using the same method done in this experiment or you can just
simply get a moisture meter to obtain fast results but it would be more costly.
Answers to Questions:
4. Why do we use a fixed temperature range to dry soils? What is the effect on soils of
microwave drying?
We use a fixed temperature range in drying soil samples in order for us to attain a
When a microwave is used in drying a soil sample it will definitely be faster since it
can reach high temperature in a short amount of time but then the dryness of the soil
sample would not be uniform since it was heated so fast so the outer particles may not
5. What is the function of the container lid and desiccator when determining the water
content of soil?
The container lid and desiccator is used to avoid the soil sample from absorbing any
water or moisture in the air. The laboratory is air-conditioned and humid so the soil