You are on page 1of 53

MEMBERS

CHIEF COUNSEL
DONALD P. WAGNER, VICE CHAIR AU SON MERRI LEES
LUIS A. ALEJO
DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL
EDCHAU
DAVID CHILI
JAMES GALLAGHER
IHfnrniz IjisIzzhxrI? LEORA GERSHENZON
COUNSEL
CRISTINA GARCIA TOM CLARK
CHRIS Ft HOLDEN ERIC DANG
BRIAN MAIENSCHEIN ANTHONY LEW
PHILIP TING COMMITTEE SECRETARY
CINDY MORANTE
STATE CAPITOL ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SECRETARY
P0. BOX 942849
SACRAMENTO, CA 94249-0108
MARK STONE, CHAIR ALEXANDRIA SMITH-DAVIS
(916) 3192334

Jawoslaw Waszczuk
2216 Katzakian Way
Lodi, CA 95242

Re: Sacramento County Superior Court and University of California Regents Complaint

Dear Mr. Waszczuk,

Thank you for contacting me regarding your complaint about Sacramento County Superior Court
Judge Shelleyanne Chang and the University of California Regents.

I appreciate hearing about your case; however I am unable to provide legal support or advice to
the public. The Assembly Judiciary Committee does not have the legal authority or subject
matter expertise to investigate court cases or judges.

I have referred your inquiry and the material provided to your representative in the Assembly,
the Honorable Jim Cooper. You may also want to send the information to Commission on
Judicial Performance.

Again, thank you for contacting me and I wish you luck in your case.

Sincerely,

/-
ARK STONE

CC: The Honorable Assemblyrneinber Jim Cooper

Printed on Recycled Paper


tttc if (California

Tiaminission on Ijubirial 1jerformanre


15 Ontn tt Atnnur, $uiti 14400
'an Francisro, (LA 9,1102-3 66 0
(415) 557-1200
FAX (415) 557-1266
Web Site: http://cjpca.gov

August 24, 2016

Mr. Jaroslaw Waszczuk


7216 Katakian Way
Lodi, CA 93242

Dear Mr. Waszczuk:

We have read your communication. Your complaint concerns the conduct of the
court clerks. The Commission has no jurisdiction over the court personnel. You may
wish to write to the presiding judge of that court, who is authorized to receive complaints
about court personnel. The address is:

Honorable Kevin R. Culhane


Sacramento County Superior Court
720 Ninth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814

\Very truly yours,

Mary Harvey
Secretary to Scuff Counsel

MH:hsLO824 I 6Waszczuk
Jaroslaw "Jerry" Waszczuk
Plaintiff & Appellant
In Pro Per
2216 Katzakian Way
Lodi, CA 95242
Phone: (209) 663-2977
Fax: (209) 2471089
jjwl 980('live.com

August 30, 2016

Hon. Kevin R. Cuihane


Presiding Judge
Sacramento County Superior Court
720 Ninth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814

RE. THE ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE EVIL OF CORRUPTION


Court of Appeal-Waszczuk v. Regents of the University of California et al. Case
No. C079524; Superior Court Case No: No. 34-2013-3400155479.
Court of Appeal Waszczuk v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, Case
No. 079254; Superior Court Case No: 34-2013-80001699

Dear Presiding Judge Cuihane,

Enclosed is the August 21, 2016 letter to the State of California Chief Justice Hon. Tani
G. Cantil-Sakauye to whom to whom the letter is addressed. It is self-explanatory and
does not require much elaboration.
I am presenting the issue of the evil of corruption in the court directly to the Sacramento
County Superior Court presiding judge on the advice of the letter I received from the
State of California Commission of Judicial Performance dated August 24, 2016.

INTRODUCTION

I am a self-represented litigant in the above two cases pending in the Court of Appeal
Third Appellate District, Sacramento, due to the unfavorable decisions of the Sacramento
County Superior Court Judges Hon. Shelleyanne Chang from Department 24 and Hon.
David I. Brown from the Department 53. I am not happy with Judge Chang or Judge
Brown's unfavorable rulings; however, their rulings are not the subject of this letter
because their decision is being handled by the Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District.
This letter concerns a self-represented litigant who has paid to file a motion and amended
complaints and the record on appeals, including the clerk and reporter transcripts. The
cost to maintain two court cases and pay for all court services is quite significant for a 65-
year-old worker whose life was devastated a few years ago by his employer, the UC
Davis Medical Center (UCDMC), which is located a few miles away from the
Sacramento County Superior Court.

Apparently, the significance and relevance of these two cases in which I am representing
myself and which are pending in the Court of Appeal are important for the defendant, the
Regents of the University of California (UC) (hereafter Regents), as they decided to use
corruption to destroy me entirely by derailing the judicial process in the Court of Appeal
by any means and cost and with despicable disregard for the court of law and justice,
which should be served without discrimination to any party regardless of social status,
race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, political view, and so on.

If the presiding judge of the Sacramento County Superior Court read my request for
intervention letter submitted to California Chief Justice Hon. Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye and
the last two motions I submitted to the Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, then
the presiding judge would see how ruthlessly and despicably the corrupt staff from both
courts collaborated to not allow me to finish the appeal. Apparently, they know from
information given to them by the university's n1afia that due to my financial status and
health condition, any delay or derailment of the process would impact my health due to
enormous stress and other serious health problems and that eventually I would find
myself homeless due to being unemployed for four years and the subsequent financial
disaster. I am not there yet, but the corrupt court personnel collaborating with the
university organize crime cost me a significant amount of money and stress. They did so
by blocking for almost one year the court record to be submitted to the Court of Appeal
and denying my motion to transfer records for sanction by using a rubber stamp with
Court of Appeal Presiding Justice's name on it.

In my last two motions and appellate briefs, I noted California's Rules of Court, Rule
8.23. As the authorities in my motions and briefs, I cited People v. Grimes, 90 Cal. Rptr.
3d 787, 172 Cal. App. 4th 121 (Cal. App. Dist. 3 03/16/2009), in which the court held the
following:

The superior court clerk must "promptly mail" to the Court of Appeal
notification of the filing of a notice of appeal (Cal. Rules of Court, rule

PA
8.304(c)(1); further rule references are to these rules). "The failure of a
court reporter or clerk to perform any duty imposed by statute or these
rules that delays the filing of the appellate record is an unlawful
interference with the reviewing court's proceedings...." (Id., rule 8.23).

In the same case, the court reminded the parties and clerks in the lower courts what could
happen and how grave consequences could result from the failure of a clerk to perform
his or her duties:

In 1935, the mishandling of a timely notice of appeal resulted in


defendant Rush Griffin's execution before his appeal could be heard.
The ensuing furor led to the "automatic" appeal procedure now
employed in capital cases (See People v. Massie (1998) 19 Cal. 4th 550,
566-567).

After almost 10 months, on April 13, 2016, from the notice of designation record of
appeal dated June 22, 2015, the record on appeal was transmitted from the Superior Court
to the Court of Appeal and filed.

I do not need to explain to the presiding judge that because the record on appeal transfer
was not transferred to the appellate court for almost one year, in light of People v. iviassie
(1998) 19 Cal. 4th 550, 566-567), it would be a life-and-death case or a long prison term
for a person who did not commit a crime but was convicted because of prejudice and
corruption in the court.

The above is the worst-case scenario, which happened to Rush Griffin in 1935. In
addition, I lost thousands of dollars due to corruption amongst the court personnel, which
is apparently on UC's rotten administration's special Christmas list. If somebody from
court with a long employment history, good salary and future retirement engages himself
in criminal activities and a conspiracy to obstruct and derail the justice process to cover
up others' corruption and fraud, then the reason for such criminal activities are
racketeering and bribery, the offer of a better position or fear of losing employment and
never being hired for any public employment position. This is how government
corruption works.

As I noted previously, the UCDMC is located a few miles from the Sacramento County
Superior Court, and if the presiding judge of the Sacramento County Superior Court
checks the court's public case access system, how many hundreds of court cases pended
or were pending in which UCDMC and UC Davis were named the defendants? There is
no need for further explanation of how many plaintiffs were harmed because they were
served "justice" by the friends of the UC mobsters.

3
My both court cases are deeply rooted in the enormous multi million-dollar Al Capone—
style illegal power sale activities from the UCDMC 27 MW cogeneration power plant
called the "central plant," which I have nicknamed "Vanderhoef" $65,000,000 slot
machine." after the former UC Davis Chancellor Larry Vanderhoef who died on October
15, 2015 at age of 74 in UC Davis Medical Center.

As I previously mentioned, the multimillion dollars in cash from illegal power sales,
Vanderhoef's $ 65,000 slot machine Al Capone's style operation resulted in
multimillion-dollar federal and state tax fraud.

It is unknown to me whether UC Davis long time Chancellor Larry Vanderhoef got


manipulated into crime by his inner circle or whether he was a chancellor whose legacy
was built on fraud and a vision similar to that of dictators or whose priority was to build
unnecessary monolithic structures at the cost of their own citizens suffering who were
struggling to buy food and have a place to live.

In case of UC Davis, Vanderhoels expansion of the UC Davis legacy was built on


drastic increases in students' tuition fees, a lack of affordable housing for students, the
misappropriation of public funds and fraud. His legacy ended in turmoil amongst the
students at UC Davis in the form of massive student protests. Vanderhoef s past activities
took a toll on his successor Linda Katehi, who was which hunted by UC President Janet
Napolitano not long ago for her attempts to keep up with UC Davis's expenses, which
Vanderhoef passed to her in 2009 upon his resignation.

For the above reason I would like to present my story about the UC Davis former
Chancellor Larry Vamderhoef which lead to destruction and devastation of my and my
family life and to the evil of corruption in the two courts

It is appearing that the houses of law are not immune from the vicious cycle of corruption
and discrimination I am challenging for the last eight years because of my employment
with the UC Davis Medical Center(UCDM) . My last day of work with UCDMC was
December 7, 2012 but discrimination against did not end on December 7, 2012 and still
being carry out by state agencies court personnel on rotten by corruption university
administration behalf.

I never would have expected that I became subject of discrimination in access to justice
from the court's personnel in the Sacramento County Superior Court and the Court of
Appeal, 3" Appellate because the Defendant(s) or Real Party In Interests are the
Regents of the University of California or their agents

4
I already once asked Hon. David Brown from the Department 53 during the court
hearing in April 2015 whether I would have to go outside the courthouse and shoot
myself to make him look for truth (CR 35, 1-13).

On that day, I did not know yet what the stakes were in both of my cases. However, I was
very close to finding out that the stakes were the $65,000,000 of dirty cash made in 1999-
2003 from the illegal power sale by the former UC Davis Chancellor Larry Vanderhoef. I
believe that Hon. David Brown knew about this from Hon. Shelleyanne Chang or from
my dismissal on December 16, 2014, of my crooked attorney Douglas Stein, who, in
panic, disclosed his 20-year relationship with Hon. David Brown in a text message,
which is part of the court record. This was the main reason why I fired him on December
16, 2014. Nobody would keep an attorney who conspired with a judge he had known for
20 years and with the opposing party's attorneys to destroy his own client who paid him
$20,000 for representation.

THE SELF-REPRESENTATION

In December 2014, I had no choice but to force myself to take over the two cases from
my attorney Douglas Stein, who, together with the attorneys from the Porter Scott law
firm, Michael Poll and Douglas Ropel representing the UC Regents and Hon. David
Brown, attempted to destroy my wrongful termination lawsuit against the Regents of the
University of California and nine individual defendants, some of whom carried out
vicious assaults against me in different forms of psychological terror in 2006-2008 and
2011-2012, including an attempt to assassinate me on May 31, 2012, in an ill-crafted but
unsuccessful provocation.

Attorney Douglas Stein, together with Michael Poll, as early as June 2014 came up with
the idea to eliminate the most important part of the lawsuit, the Settlement Agreement I
signed with UC Chancellor Larry Vanderhoef in February 2009.
This was done via a First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by Douglas Stein on my
behalf on June 16, 2014. The next step was to attack the FAC with a Special Motion
Strike (SLAPP 425. 16) with the involvement and help of Hon. David Brown.
Douglas Stein knew Hon. David Brown for 20 years.

To carry out the plan, on September 22, 2014, Douglas Stein arranged the FAC to be
resubmitted as the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) to Department 53 with a
Stipulation for Leave to Amend the Complaint and Ex-Parte Application to File the SAC.
On the same day September 22, 2014, Hon. David Brown approved the Douglas Stein's
Ex-Parte Application, and he filed the SAC with a suspended attorney license on
September 30, 2014, against my will and instruction not to file the improperly amended
complaint.

The price tag for the use of Hon. David Brown to do the dirty destruction job of my
lawsuit was set by Douglas Stein and Porter Scott's attorney Michael Pott to the
approximate amount of $300,000. It was a token in comparison to the $65,000,000 made
by UC Davis Chancellor Vanderhoef from illegal power sales.
The above approximate guessed by me amount corresponds with Douglas Stein's legal
fee information in the lawsuit against the UC Davis Health System—Center for
Healthcare Policy and Research with an unspecified plaintiff in the amount of $341,915
he received from the owner of the Internet newspaper Davis Vanguard, David
Greenwald, on September 25, 2014.
Douglas Stein published my lawsuit on Davis Vanguard after he filed the SAC.

The number of legal fees was most likely from Janet Keyzer' s wrongful termination case,
which was resolved by court trial in August 2014. David Greenwald learned the amount
of the legal fees in the above case in August 2014 from UC Davis under a Public Record
Act request. Janet Keyzer's case was also the subject of Davis Vanguard's publications
and cover.
In 2015, in a motion for legal fees and cost, Porter Scott attorney Douglas Ropel
confirmed that the SLAPP was very precisely coordinated between Michael Poft and
Douglas Stein. The document filed by Douglas Ropel showed that the SLAPP was
approved on September 24, 2015, by Greer Gustayson from the Sedgwick Insurance
Company, which was covering the cost of the University of California litigations. It
happened two days after Hon. David Brown approved the Ex-Parte Application to File
the SAC. The Sedgwick Insurance Company conducts serious business, and any lawsuit
in which the University of California is involved takes some time for Sedgwick to
approve. In this case, everything was perfectly set and was waiting for Hon. David
Brown to take action against me to rescue the criminals from the University of California
responsible for the Al-Capone-style $65,000,000 worth of gambling with state and
federal taxes and to destroy my existence and life at the age of 63.

These facts also indicate that the UC General Counsel Charles Robinson, who
participated in the $65,000,000 illegal power sale fraud in 1999-2003 and related to tax
fraud and he participated in covering up the fraud in 2007, approved the payoff for
Douglas Stein if my lawsuit would go down the drain on December 30, 2014, due to the
SLAPP motion would left unopposed by Douglas Stein. Stein an Poft and apparently
well informed Hon. Davis Brown never have expected that Stein would be fired from
the case before the lawsuit would go down the drain

ro
On December 15 and 16, 2014, Wells Fargo Bank called me on both my cell phone and
home phone and asked about Douglas Stein, saying they were trying to collect debt from
him. Douglas Stein was completely financially broke and emptied the $20,000 retainer in
the Wells Fargo account I had helped to open for him in June 2014 by paying him
20,000 to take on my wrongful termination. The balance was negative in the retainer
account, and Wells Fargo Bank informed me that I was responsible for the negative
balance of the account. I paid the negative balance, and I was able to close the account to
prevent it from further being used by Stein.
When I pressed Stein about it, he responded that he would get money on January 1, 2015.
Stein's response corresponded with a scheduled court hearing for the UC Regents'
SLAPP motion on December 30, 2014 which was left unopposed by Stein for the know
reason

Stein got fired on December 16, 2014 for failure to oppose the SLAPP; for filing the SAC
improperly amended in September 2014, for disclosing in panic that he knew Hon. David
Brown for 20 years, and he would get an extension to file opposition because I told him
that I would report him to the California State Bar for his misconduct. When I got his text
message about his 20-year relationship with Hon. David Brown, then it was the end of
Stein's representation.

On December 17, 2014, Douglas Stein, despite being fired, went to court anyway, and
like in September 2014, Stein's longtime friend Hon. David Brown issued an order that
the SAC filed on September 30, 2014, by Stein with a suspended attorney license was
deemed valid and order an extension to continue the SLAPP. This was despite Hon.
David Brown being informed by Michael Pott during the ex-parte hearing that I had fired
Stein on December 16, 2014. It should be taken into consideration whether Douglas Stein
and Michel Poll made any offers to Hon. David Brown for destruction of my lawsuit.

On December 24, 2014, I advised Stein by e-mail as follows.


• From: Jaroslaw Waszczuk [rnailto:jjw 1 980@live.coml
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 11:25 AM
To: Douglas Stein' <attydsteingrnail .com>
Cc: desquire 1962' <desquire 1 962@hotrnail . corn>; 9162226654@tmomail .net
Subject: Your deceiving behavior to the very end.

English definition of "deceive":


to persuade someone that something false is the truth, or to keep the truth hidden
from someone for your own advantage

Good Morning, Doug.

I1
I read again your text messages you sent to me last evening, and you were trying
very hard to deceive me to the very end. If I were you and in your place (I never
will be), then I would send a letter to Hon. Judge Brown in Sacramento Superior
Court and apologize for deceiving the court of law and the judge himself
regardless of the consequences.
Second, I would call or write to the California State Bar and provide full
disclosure of why and how you got yourself into a mess with the law, who and
when somebody from UC coerced you and why. I know that your drastic financial
situation made you very vulnerable, helpless and defenseless to corruption and
deception. You took the wrong path and way to solve your problems. I knew right
away that after I offered you a deal that if you quit on your own than I would not
go after the S20K+ retainer I paid to you but you refused to quit. It it was the best
indication that something terrible was happening in your life. I don't know
whether UC bought you, offered you ajob or if they got something on you and
blackmailed you. I think it happened after I hired you for the CUIAB case or just
after you took my wrongful termination case and just before you wrote the First
Amended Complaint. You should make a wise choice and disclose truthfully
everything to the authorities and to the court regarding what caused your deception
and why you deceived your client with the help of Mr. Pott and others. It would be
very beneficial for both of us. Think about it. You are the worst enemy for
yourself. You can change the path of your life for the better if you face the
challenges by lawful means.

Jerry

Thereafter, in my complaint with the California State Bar against Douglas Stein, I
provided all the information and documents to bar investigator Amanda Gormley from
the San Francisco office. Ms. Gormeleyy investigated the case and on September 25,
2015, informed me by e-mail that the case would be submitted to the California State Bar
prosecutor by October 9, 2015. Since then, my case and the investigator, Ms. Gormley,
vanished, and I never heard from her again. Her supervisor, Laura Sharek, gave me a
vague response, and my multiple inquiries with the California State Bar Director
Elizabeth Parker to update me about the status of the cases produced no result.

THE FINAL SOLUTION

The cash flow illegal power sale stopped flowing in 2003 for Vanderhoef and his clique
involved in the fraud. The Vanderhoef miscalculation caused losses of in amount
hundreds of millions of dollars a billion dollars instead of millions of dollars I have
worked in the US for many years for the private power companies, and I know how

iV
much money 27 MW cogeneration plant could make in 10 years even selling 10 MW
per hour, especially in peak time during the heat of California's summer.

In April 2012, Vanderhoef s ruthless mafia decided that there was no other choice but to
lure me onto the premises, anger me, provoke a physical confrontation and either shoot
me to death or disable me permanently and this way to remove the threat of eventual
disclosure of fraud despite the fact that in 2012 I didn't have any clue that the fraud had
been committed and I would be more happy seeing UCDMC 27 MW cogeneration
facility selling power instead of idle on minimum load at night and forcing to fire the
auxiliary boilers to make steam for the Medical Center. I never seen such waste of the
millions of dollars in any place of my 30 years employment in United States infour
different states . This is a crime itself.

On May 31, 2012, Vanderhoef s gangsters lured me onto the UCDMC premises by
bribing UCDPD Lt. James Barbour with a $35,000 wage increase. They had the UCDMC
Trauma Nursing Unit ready to receive me. I calmly walked away from the ill-planned
provocation described in the June 1, 2012, exchange of e-mail correspondence between
the UC Davis group of gangsters, which I nicknamed the "UC Davis Death Squad" after I
learned about it in November 2012 Instead of being able to go back to do my job, which
was guaranteed to me by the Settlement Agreement signed by Vanderhoef in February
2009, I was target to be shot and killed or permanently disabled, taking into
consideration the poster with my photo and physical description issued three months after
death trap provocation by new UC Davis Chief of Police Matt Carmichael and
distributed around UC Davis campuses without my knowledge (poster enclosed).

On December 7, 2012 my employment was terminated by the order of UC General


Counsel Charles Robinson , the key player in the Vanderhoef's miscalculated fraud and
key player in covering up the fraud.
The Charles Robinson unlawful order to terminate my employment was legitimized by
Vanderhoef henchman UC Davis Associate Vice Chancellor Alan Tollefson' who ws
handpicked as Skelly Reviewer.
On December 2012 UC Davis Chancellor Emeritus Larry Vanderhoef was recovering in
UC Davis Medical Center from the November 2012 ischemic stroke.
Coincidently in December 2012 we were both fighting for our survival and wellbeing.

UC DAVIS CHANCELLOR LARRY VANDERHOEF 1994-2009

A member of Sword and Sandals, Vanderhoef led UC Davis for 25 years, first as provost
and executive vice chancellor (1984-1994) and then as chancellor (1994-2009)
Rumors were published that Vanderhoef has a 2-million-dollar special account with
money he could use as he wished. It was allegedly based on the UC Davis Academic
Senate former member's information littps locahuki oig dais Lain Vanderhoef

In 2006, Vanderhoef found himself on a collision course with the UC Davis faculty.

Jerold Theis works at UC Davis as a medical microbiology professor; his research


interests include forensic pathology and foodbonie parasites. In January 2006, Theis the
chair of the Academic Freedom and Responsibility Committee in the Academic Senate
created a petition for a vote of "no confidence" for Vanderhoef' s leadership. Theis argued
that the university administration had become bloated and that Vanderhoef had "wasted
millions of dollars of state money to preserve the power structure."
Vanderhoef presided over the largest increase in administrative officers in the history of
the campus.

In late March 2006, Theis began investigating claims made by one of the center's
former surgeons, Casey Daggett, against the UCDMC. Casey alleged that university
pressured him into resigning by threatening to ruin his medical career after he raised
complaints against the UCDMC's practices. Casey's complaints included cases of
"patient maltreatment, inappropriate sexual relations and personal harassment in the
workplace."
THE UC DAVIS WORLD - CLASS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
BUILD IN 2002 AND NAMED "MONDAVI CENTER"

After being named chancellor in 1994, Vanderhoef vowed to bring a world-class


performing arts center to UC Davis.
• "There were any number of people who advised against building a performing arts
center, told him it was just a pipe dream," said Don Roth, the center's executive
director. "He listened to them, but he saw the need. He had the vision to push it
through, knowing it would be meaningful not just to our students but to the entire
region. He'll be remembered for that.

Read more here:


http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/obituaries/article39380853. html# storylinkcpy

The 'class performing arts center" in UC Davis became Vanderhoef's obsession


and is only known is known in other parts of the USA because of November 2011
pepper spray attack against protesting students.

To finance his delusional vision that UC Davis and his art center make him a chancellor
known by the entire world, as same as one one chancellor known from history book.
Apparently somebody who knew well the Vanderhoef s obsession gave him the idea to
build in the UC Davis Medical Center the 27 MW cogeneration power plant at cost of

10
$ 65,000, 000 which would pay for his S 60,000,000 world-class performing arts
center" by selling illegally power per contract with public utilities or on the spot
market due to the energy marked deregulation in California in 1994-2001. The power
marked deregulation in California is well remembered by the California residents as the
California Energy Crisis and rolling blackouts and forty billions loses for the California
economy.

The UC Davis Medical Center was chosen by Vanerhoef and his advisor to build at cost
of the 5 65,000, 000 the 27 MW cogeneration power plant because the UCDMC was
already connected to the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) and did not
require to build transmission line to sell the power. For information the 27 MW plant
could power up town with 25, 000 residents. In 1998 UC Davis Medical Center demand
for power was less than 5 MW in contrary to UC Davis Campus demand of 100 MW.
The UC Davis campus does not have own cogeneration plant.

Under the guidance from his criminally minded advisors and participants in the crime,
Chancellor Vanderhoef's was dragged into white collar crime scheme and fraud which
outlived his death occurred in October 2015.

The Vanderhoef's fulfilled his visionary obsession of 1994 and his world-class
performing arts center had an opening ceremony in 2002 at cost of S 60, 000,000.It was
named the Mondavi Center after the famous California winemakers, the Mondavi family
which contributed $ 10, 000,00 to build Mondavi Center or money were used to build 27
MW cogeneration plant in UCDMC. The Mondavi Center includes Jackson Hall, named
after university professor William Jackson, whose wife Barbara donated $5,000,000 to
the project in memory of him. It seats 1,801, and Vanderhoef Studio Theatre is named
after former university chancellor Vanderhoef himself.

It correspondent with 1999 to 2003 with the UCDM 27 central plant which generated
approximately 65-70 million dollars of dirty cash free of tax, which was most likely used
to pay for Vanderhoef's visions, including but not limited to the UC Davis Mondavi
Center. It generated millions of dollars of illegal cash not only by selling illegal power
but also gouging the price of energy along with crooked power producers such as Enron,
causing rolling blackouts for California residents, who were paying price for
Vanderhoef's and other UC administrators' corruption and greed.

The Vanaderhoef' s obsession to build "world -class performing arts center' in UC Davis
with Vanderhoef Theatre Studio named after him is closely akin to obsession of the
former Senate President Pro Tempore Darrell Steinberg . I addressed this subject in my
letter September 25, 2015 letter to U.S Senator Honorable Dianne Feinstein who is a
wife of the UC Regent Mr. Richard Blum. I asked quite few times for help with ssam
result as in attached her one of responses.

11
• "Before I sent my first inquiry to your office, requesting help, I asked for help from
several state agencies and state legislators, including and not limited to Hon. Assembly
Speaker John Perez, who nominated one of the corrupted members of the California
Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, backed up by the State of California Office of
Attorney General and Judge of the County of Sacramento Superior Court Hon. Sallyanne
Chang.

State of California Assembly Speaker responded to my inquiry with a vague letter


because he had already secured for himself the Regent Position with the University of
California and had replaced Hon. Toni Atkins, who was sworn in as Assembly Speaker.

On June 25, 2013, I sent a seven-page inquiry for help to Hon. Darrell Steinberg-
California Senate President Pro Tempore; Hon. Das Williams-State of California
Assembly Member and Chair of the Higher Education Committee; Hon. Roger
Hernandez-State of California Assembly Member and Chair on the Labor and
Employment Committee with the same result. In 2000, I was briefly involved, together
with Hon. Darrell Steinberg, in bringing back to work four suspended employees at the
UC Davis Medical Center Integrated Access Unit.

These four workers became the target of vicious and unscrupulous retaliatory action by
UCDMC management after they had complained about safety issues in the department,
and they were escorted off campus, suspended without pay, and placed on investigatory
leave. One of the complaining workers was accused of serious misconduct and received a
letter of dismissal.

The Hon. Steinberg responded to my inquiry but refused to help. If I had known in 2013
about the 60-year-old William Prindible, who was fired from his job because he was
doing his duty, I would have mentioned this to Mr. Steinberg as well. The previously
mentioned William Prindible was suffering from bipolar disorder, as was Mr. Steinberg's
daughter, Jordana, when she was 7 years old, according to many publications. Also, Mr.
Steinberg's daughter suffered and recovered from a more serious mental illness during a
very challenging and heart-touching journey. Mr. Steinberg daughter's illness is what
drove Proposition 63.

However, in 2013, I did not know that Mr. Steinberg had secured for himself the
prestigious Director of Policy and Advocacy position for the new UC Davis Behavioral
Health Center of Excellence, the $7.5 million UC Davis center funded by Proposition 63,
California's tax on millionaires that funds programs for people who are mentally ill.
Steinberg, a longtime advocate for mental health programs, wrote the 2004 measure, and
the institution was funded by a measure he championed while in the Legislature. It was a
remarkable achievement. However, I am not sure whether Mr. Steinberg knew before he
became a Director of Policy and Advocacy for the new UC Davis Behavioral Health
Center of Excellence how many thousands of UC Davis employees, including myself,
were forced to visit psychiatrists and psychologists to seek help due to unscrupulously

12
abusive and vindictive Nazis such as the corrupted UC Davis administration and
management.

THE UC DAVIS MEDICAL 27 MW COGNERATION PLANT NAMED


CANTRAL PLANT AND NICKNAMED "VANDRHOEF'S S 651 000 1 000 ILLGAL
SLOT MACHINE"

The UCDMC state of the art 27 cogeneration power plan powered by LM 5000 jet
engine was commissioned in 1998 unfinished and was lacking of safety for operating
personnel.
The plaque on the front door proudly displaying Vanderhoef name and his vision for the
next 1000 years of the UC Davis Reich with the words
"Conceived, designed and constructed to support the medical center's mission
by providing reliable utilities in the next millennium."
The above misleading statement on the plaque condones Vanderhoef and others'
involvement in the $65,000,000 misappropriations of public funds, future money
laundering and multimillion-dollar state and federal tax fraud. The Vanderhoef s and his
collaborators or crime investors devastated my and my family's lives beyond
imagination and harmed many other UC Davis employees' lives as well, in addition to
harm done to tax payers. I have listed some of Vanderhoef s white crime victims and the
other participants in his crime in the 2015 court documents.

In 1998-2003 Vanderhoef most likely don't know and did not care about the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission Requirements to operate cogeneration facility and to sell
commercially power (commodity) by not for profit organization . He had on his side
Governor Grey Davis Attorney General Bill Lockyer,. Pacific Gas and Electric.
Sacramanto Municipal Utility District. As the FERC documents show the most
important participant in the Vanderhoef's Al-Capone style fraud was the California
Independent System Operator (CAISO) with Governor Grey Davis in charge of CAISO
Board of Directors and the CALISO General Counsel Charles Robinson who became in
January 2007 the UC General Counsel after Vanderhoef's $ 65,000. 0000 was covered
up by totally fraudulent agreement approved by FERC on March 1, 2007with resulted
millions of dollars harm for states and federal taxpayers.

On February 2001, California Governor Gray, with a closed staff, toured Vanderhoef's
UCDMC 27 MW cogeneration plant and blessed the Al Capone—style illegal sale of
power and commodities worth millions of dollars free of tax. Most like Governor Chief
Deputy Secretary and future judge of the Sacramento Superior Court Shellayanne Chang
toured the UC Davis Central Plant together with Governor Grey Davis. ( See enclosure )
The tour took place during the already pending fraud case with the US Federal Energy

13
Regulatory Commission (FERC) against major power producers. The FERC case
included references to the central plant including the UC Davis Medical Canter 27 MW
cogeneration facility as the participant in the fraud.

The FERC's complaint against the UCDMC 27 MW central plant alleged fraud,
misrepresentation, other forms of market manipulation, wrongful conduct, electricity
market manipulation and the violation of any applicable tariffs, regulations, laws and
rules.( see: enclosed complaint with the State Board of Equalization for tax fraud)

THE PSYCHOLOGICAL TERROR AND ATTEMPT TO TERMIANTE MY


EMPLOYMENT IN 2007 BY VANDERHOEF

It most likely that In 2005, Vanderhoef was blackmailed or manipulated by the UC


Davis Campus Counsel Steven Drown and another UC Davis lawyer Stephen Chilcott
who most likely told him that he is facing grave legal consequences if the illegal power
and related to the multimillion tax fraud will surface.
Chilcott and Drown most likely made the recommendation to Vanderhoef in damage
control to terminate the UCDMC Plant Operation and Maintenance Department Manager
Tony Moddessette who had MBA degree and replace him with his assistant high school
educated Charles Witcher who will participate in the witch hunt without asking questions
in exchange for fat paycheck and position he did not qualify for. Stephen Chilott surfaces
in the fraud cover up process as unknown to anybody attorney with little experiences and
$ 60, 000 salary in 2005 with title HR Investigator and was promoted. In February 2009
after Vanderhoef signed with me the Settlement -Agreement Chilcott title was already
HR Labor Relation Manager a with 138 K salary and year later as a UC Davis Health
System HR Executive Director with $ 2008 K salary. It is more than Judge with 20 years
on the bench in Scaramanto County Superior Court. Today Chilcott makes more than
State of California Chief Justice Justice Hon. Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye. Frauds and white
collar crimes pays well in the University of California. Look at UC President Janet
Napolitano and US President Barak Obama annual salary.

In August 2005, I was assisting my coworker from the UCDMC 27 MW cogeneration


facility in a whistleblowing complaint related to the massive oil discharge into the
Sacramento River for seven years via city storm drains from the plant's cooling tower's
24 defective gear boxes. This environmental crime was finally stopped after my coworker
William Buckans, who was injured on the oil slippery surface underneath cooling tower
and filed a whistleblowing complaint.

The whistle blowing complaint was filed with the UC Davis Provost and Vice Chancellor
office. The complaint with state or federal environmental enforcement agency to
investigate the crime was not submitted but if so it could have led to the disclosure of the

14
illegal power sale and tax fraud of which I or my coworker William Buckans in 2005
had no knowledge that power sale was illegal

Apparently manipulated by the two attorneys Steven Drown and Stephen Chilcott and
fed with the news he did not like to hear Vanderhoef became so nervous that in panic he
assigned Chilcott two assistant vice chancellors from UC Davis to control damages by
any means and repel the possibility of the disclosure of the illegal power sale and related
to tax fraud The damage control cost the department and plant managers their jobs, and
the school attempted to terminate my employment in January 2007 when I was still
recovering from the open heart surgery. I did not have a clue in January 2007 that
power was being illegally sold and I did not care to know. It was a little suspicious why
the plant stopped selling power in 2003 and nobody talk about why it happened.

After mu coworker submitted his August 2005 whistle blowing complaint the hostility in
Central Plant in 2005-2007 ordered by Stephen Chilcott and artificially created and aimed
at my two coworkers and myself as main target to provoke me and remove me from the
university landscape was beyond imagination, human decency, unavailable and
despicable that it is taking place in the University of California

Vanderhoef was not able to terminate my employment in March 2007 due to a lack of
collaboration from the plant manager and plant supervisor, who had given me annual
employment evaluations since 1999 that were excellent. Vanderhoef ordered the plant
manager to be fired, and I was abruptly and unlawfully moved from the central plant to a
different shop. Failure to terminate me caused postponement of fraud and investor or
investors which vested money to build the UC Davis Medical Central Plant were losing
millions of dollars since 2003.

I did not know in March 2007 that California Attorney General Bill Lockyer represented
California Parties in the FERC case against main power producers agreed to an
ultimatum from FERC which removed the UCDMC 27 MW cogeneration facility from
the settlement and covered up Vanderhoef' s money laundering from illegal power sales
from 1999-2003 and related to tax fraud.

The FERC's approval of the settlement on March 1, 2007 under the pressure of an
ultimatum and intimidation gave the green light to make the fraud disappear from the
public view and opened the door to continuance of making millions of dollar tax free
from the illegal generation and sale of power. However, Vanderhoef and his thugs
viewed my presence in the UCDMC as a threat to their mafia-type operation to make
money after the FERC settlement was approved, and I had be destroyed at any means.
The stake were millions of dollars and their fat paychecks and bonuses.

Vanderhoef became so paranoid that his criminal activities would surface that in 2007, he
personally ordered on August 27, 2007 the letter of expectation to be removed from my

15
coworker's personal file reporting the massive oil discharge into the Sacramento River.
The letter of expectation was not even counted as a disciplinary action under UC Davis's
policies. The criminals who were responsible for the environmental crime by refusing to
provide $120,000 to replace defective gear boxes were rewarded for their seven years of
ongoing crime with large bonuses and higher positions.

THE 2007-2009 BATTLE WITH THE VANDERHOEF'S THUGS TO GET MY


JOB BACK IN THE UCDMC CENTRAL PLANT

I fought back against Vanderhoefs attempt to fire me and cover up his crime and did not
know why I was the subject of terror and inhumane treatment at a time when I was still
recovering from open-heart surgery.

My battle with Vanderhoef s thugs stretched out to November 2008. I was using
administrative remedies under the UC Davis Complaint Resolution Policy PPSM 70 (to
get my job back in the UCDMC 27 MW cogeneration facility where I had worked since
June 1999 with perfect annual employee evaluations. I was abruptly removed from the
facility, not knowing that the central plant is Vanderhoef and his cronies' personal
multimillion-dollar slot machine in which I was working since June 1999.

On June 2, 2008, Vanderhoef submitted a letter of intent to resign from the UC Davis
Chancellor position.

In November 2008, after a long and exhausting battle to get my job back in the UCDMC
central plant, I defeated Vanderhoef in the arbitration process. It was presided over by
UC Davis Assistant Vice Chancellor Connie Melendy, who was assigned to the
arbitration by Vanderhoef. It was pure luck that I prevailed in arbitration against
Vanderhoef because the arbitrator was assigned to issue a decision that would lead to the
termination of my employment shortly after the arbitration. The decision issued by
Connie Melendy left no doubt that this was the goal. I accidently found out that there is
no UC Davis policy that allows management to use employee reassignment as tool of
disciplining employees, which is how I survived the arbitration after the prior three
negative decisions issued by the corrupt UCDMC directors who were perpetrators in the
psychological terror against me and participant in covering up the Vanderhoef's $ 65,
000,000 fraud and disregarded the environmental law by permitting discharge of machine
oil to the Sacramento RiveR via storm drain from defective equipment in Central Plant.

Vanderhoef assigned attorney to the arbitration process who held the UC Davis HR
assistant director position and who represented Vanderhoef in the arbitration process,
Dawn Capp, lost her high-paying job directly after I prevailed in the arbitration process.
The arbitrator Connie Melendy, the associate vice chancellor, also disappeared from UC
Davis shortly after Dawn Capp lost herjob. The casualties and toll this incident was

16
taking became visible due to Vanderhoef' s vision of a world-class performing arts center
at UC Davis and his crimes against taxpayers and UC Davis employees, including but not
limited to the violation of my and others civil and human rights and the destruction of
people's lives.

THE FEBRUARY 2009 SETTLEMENT- AGREEMENT WITH VANDERHOEF

Not having much choice after the arbitration, Vanderhoef ordered UC Campus Counsel
Steven Drown, his partner in crime since 1999, to execute a settlement agreement with
me to control the damage and to attempt to erase any mention of me from UC Davis's
hi story.

The 2009 settlement agreement provided me a new exempt position as an associate


development engineer in exchange for staying permanently in the UCDMC HYAC shop,
where I was abruptly moved by Vanderhoef' s orders in March 2007 and not to return to
the 27 MW cogeneration facility. The settlement was similar to Vanderhoef s settlement
with UC Davis Vice Chancellor Celeste Rose, who was asked to resign from her post in
2005. Vanderhoef offered Celeste Rose a compensation package behind closed doors to
prevent a lawsuit. The difference between our cases was that, financially, the
compensation for the terror I experienced from Vanderhoef' s thugs was nothing in
comparison to the settlement with Celeste Rose. I believe that the settlement Vanderhoef
signed with me was executed without Regents or UC President knowledge. However, I
believe that the 2009 settlement Vanderhoef signed to avoid costly litigation was
executed with full knowledge of UC General Counsel Charles Robinson who prior
January 1, 2007 held the General Counsel position in California Independent System
Operator (CAISO) . CAISO participated in the UCDMC 27 MW Central illegal power
sale in proximate amount of S 65,000, 0000470,000,000 and related to state and federal
tax fraud and Charles participation in fraud and cover up fraud was awarded by UC
Regents $ 400,000 annual salary UC General Counsel position

THE RESIGNATION OF UC DAVIS CHANCELLOR LARRY VANDERHOEF


IN AUGUST 2009

Shortly after Vanderhoef signed the February 2009 Settlement -Agreement with me he
resigned from the UC Davis chancellor position and took one year of sabbatical
leave. .His last day as chancellor was August 16, 2009. His successor was Linda Katehi,

17
who was appointed by the UC Board of Regents on May 7, 2009, effective August 17,
2009.

THE NEW UC DAVIS CHANCELLOR LINDA KATEHI AND VANERHOEF'S


WELCOME STATEMENT

Prior his last days as UC Davis Chancellor on May 1, 2009, Vanderhoef welcomed new
coming UC Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi with the following words:
I can't imagine a more perfect next chancellor for the Davis campus than President
Yudof s recommended choice—Linda Katehi, currently provost and vice
chancellor for Academic Affairs and professor of electrical and computer
engineering at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. By virtually any
measure, she is a superstar!

From the above statement welcoming Linda Katehi as the new UC Davis Chancellor,
Vanderhoef named Katehi as his successor who would carry his past fraud and crimes
and his dirty legacy into the future. His statement welcoming Kathy as the UC Davis
chancellor sounds as if Vanderhoef had significant input and feedback about who to hire
as his successor with a similar employment history as his. This most likely led him to
believe that Katehi would not hesitate to willfully participate in fraud and crime to fulfill
his fraudulent and corrupt vision similar to that in George Orwell's novels 1984 and
Animal Farm, blended with the ideologies of Karl Marx and Adolf Hitler.

Katehi, whose past was already questionable due to her prior employment at the
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) as a provost and vice chancellor for
academic affairs and involvement in a clout scandal in May 2009 was Vanderhoels
dream successor. The UIUC investigation resulted in the resignation of the president of
the University of Illinois, who oversaw the three campuses in the university's system, and
that of the chancellor of UIUC. The scandal spread to include evidence of graft by
members of the board of trustees, resulting in the resignation of seven of the nine
members.
Vanderhoef s statement about Katehi that by virtually any measure, she is a superstar!"
was undoubtedly based on her achievements at UIUC as a provost and vice chancellor for
academic affairs and that she viewed her as the perfect candidate to deal with ongoing
turmoil and student protests on the UC Davis campus.

In August 2010. Vanderhoef returned to UC Davis as professor emeritus to teach biology.

THE UC DAVIS CHANCELLOR EMERITUS' LARRY VANDERHOEF


PARTCIPATION IN THE INVESTIGATION AFTERMATH THE SEPTEMBER
2010 SAN BRUNO, CA PIPELINE EXPLOSION WHICH WAS MAINTEINED
BY THE PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
In September 20 10. Vanderhoef was involved in the San Bruno natural gas explosion
investigation.
hffp://wwv.snidailyjournal.com/articies/lncws/2O 10- 10- 15/cpuc-appoints-five-to-
investi gate- san-bruno-explosion/ 143669.html

After his resignation from the UC Davis chancellor position in August 2009 and one year
of sabbatical leave. Vanderhoef resurfaced in September 2010 as the chair of the
California Public Utilities Commission's(CAPUC)independent review panel
investigating the 2010 San Bruno gas explosion caused by gas leaks maintained by
PG&E.

What Vanderhoef as UC Davis Chancellor Emeritus, have to do with PG&E's gas leak
and explosion that killed 8 people and devastated many families lives

The question is how Vanderhoef's chair assignment affected the PG&E's victims and
their families. CAPUC condoned and helped cover up Vanderhoef's

Who handpicked UC Davis white-collar criminal Vanderhoef for this assignment which
was apparently a coordinated effort of corrupted officials from CAPUC and PG&E?

Vanderhoef's assignment as chair of the CAPUC's independent review panel in


September indicates that CAPUC gave Vanderhoef the green light to resume operation of
the UCDMC 27 MW cogeneration plant regardless of the fact that he was no longer UC
Davis's chancellor

The PG&E was willfully participant in Vandcrhocfs illegal operation of the UCDMC 27
MW cogeneration facility. During the illegal power sales in 1999-2003 PG&E w is the
natural gas supplier to the UCDMC cogeneration facility at the approximate cost of
S3.000,000 per month.

PG&E was closely connected with the State of California Public Utility Commission and
was perfectly aware of Vanderhoef's fraudulent scheme and knew that the UCDMC 27
MW cogeneration facility was not in compliance with the federal law to be qualified as a
cogeneration facility to commercially sell power by the university, which is a non-profit
organization.

In February 2001, California Governor Grey Davis, who most likely as Lt Governor and
Regents in 1994-1995 participated in the Vanderhoef's idea to build 27 MW
cogeneration facility in wrong place to sell illegally sale , toured the UCDMC 27 MW
plant and announced during the tour that he would rescue PG& E from bankruptcy due to
the deregulation of the California Energy Market..

19
In March 2007, PG&E was the California party, together with the state of California
attorney general, in the FERC fraud case against power producers. which included the
UCDMC 27 MW cogeneration facility. PG&E was one of the participants in the FERC
settlement, which caused the illegal operations of the plant to vanish from public view,
along with $65.000.000 dollars. I still do not know how much money from fraud were
used by Vanderhoef to pay for his vision and how much it landed in the bank accounts
as form of bonuses and other pays of those who participated in the fraud.

In 2007, PG&E' s attorneys vere very familiar NNith my name (Waszczuk) due to my
disclosure to PG&E in 1997 of the over S 100,000,000 in fraud committed by my former
employer, the competitor of Enron. the Dynegy corporation. In 1997, PG&E filed a
lawsuit against Dynegy based on my information and settled the Dynegy fraud for
$100,000,000 paving me token of$150.000 for my disclosure. Dynegy and Enron in
1999-2001 participated in massive energy price gouging and rolling blackouts, which
harmed California residents, taxpayers and the California economy in general, amounting
to approximately 40 billion dollars, of which only 8 billion were recovered due to
fraudulent settlements agreements such as the FERC-approved agreement in March 2007,
which covered up Vanderhoef s crime and destroyed my and others' lives.

Vanderhoef s participation in San Bruno's PG&E gas explosion investigation that killed
8 people must be addressed in light of his $65,000,000 misappropriation of public funds
to build the UCDMC 27 MW cogeneration facility and PG&E participation in the
Vanderhoef s fraud and the cover up the fraud.

THE BLACK MAIL PETITION IN CENFRAL PLANT AND VANDERHOEF


REACTION

In September 2010, unexpectedly for Steven Dro\\n and Stephen Chilcott , four
IJCDMC Central plant operators who were my former coworkers submitted a blackmail
petition to department management stating that they would refuse to perform their duties
if they did not receive a S4.00/hour pay raise
The argument they used was that I was making $15,000 more than them after being
removed by Vanderhoef , Chilcott and Drown from the plant in March 2007. This was a
false statement, but the blackmail petition rose red flags, and Vanderhoef and ahis
partners in crime immediately dispatched special envoy UC Davis HR attorney Danesha
Nichols to monitor the volatile situation. Danseha Nichols was involved in the 2008
arbitration process in which I prevailed against Vanderhoef than she knew who is who
and what to expect.

To quiet the rebellious operators and redirect their attention from the Vandrehoef s crime
a six-step 120 o pay raise was granted by management to all plant personnel without any
opposition or questioning the blackmail petition.

AI]
In 2010, due to budget constraints and furloughs on the UC campuses, including UC
Davis, it was unthinkable for anyone to receive a 12% or six-step pay raise as a non-
exempt union or non-union employees or even for exempt University of California
employees working only one or two years for the university.

This shows Vanderhoef's thusgs paranoia that their white-collar multimillion dollar
crime cover up would surface and the law would put Vanderhoef and them in the place
they belong.

The blackmail petition for the pay raise followed in Deecmbcr 2010 a locker burglary ill
Central Plant and operator Todd Georlich's suicide, which was triggered by an
unbelievably hostile environment created purposefully by management under orders from
Stephen Chilcott in 2005-2007 to remove me from the Central Plant . Therafter hostility
never stopped and Todd Georlich was the operator who replaced me in March 2007. At
40 years old, he paid the ultimate price for Vanderhoef s and his thugs crimes

The 2010 events at the UCDMC central plant and Todd Georlichs suicide put me in
Vanderhoef' s gangsters' spotlight again.

THE NEW 2011 WAVE OF PYSCHOLOGICAL TERROR IN ATTEMPT TO


TERMINATE MY EMPLOYMENT

In April 2011, Vanderhoef s controlled mafia led by Steven Drown, UC General Counsel
Charles Robinson and UCDMC HR Executive Director Stephen Chilcott launched an
intense assault against me. The attacks included stalking, provocation of physical
confrontation, attempts to tile fraudulent worker's compensation claims. placing me on
endless investigatory leave with no notice, attempts to terminate my employment in
September 2011 and December 2011, denial of my short-term disability, attempts to force
iiie to retire, slander with unfounded accusations, attempts to force me to undergo
psychiatric evaluation, changes to my title, sabotage of my duties, attacks on my
coworkers whom I represented in their complaints against Vanderhoef's thugs, denial of
my medical benefits, attacks on my psychologist in Lodi. CA. and devastation of his
family's life because his December 17, 2011, letter postponed the termination of my
employment and delayed the Vanderhoef mafia's illegal power sales.

In October 2011. I sent a complaint to UC Davis Police Captain Joyce Souza, believing
that if somebody filed a false complaint against me that I was being hunted down like an
animal by a pack of hungry predators. The response was that there was nothing on me in
the police file. Thereafter, I began to send information to Souza, UC David Police
Department (UCDPD) Chief of Police Annette Spicuzza. and Lt. John Pike about the
volatile situation at the UCDMC.

21
THE UC DAVIS STUDENT PROTESTS AND NOVEMEBR 18, 2911 PEPPER
SPRAY ATTACK

Vanderhoef s mafia—led by Drown, Robinson. Chilcott, and the future UC Davis chief
of police—was in full control of the situation and used the November 2011 student
protests and the orchestrated pepper spray attack to remove Lt. Pike and Chief Spicuzza
immediately after the attack and, later, Captain Souza to A-vhom I complained about
management misconduct in UCDMC and provided information about my situation, Iodd
Goerlich' s suicide, child-pornography activities in the department . misuses of university
properties, and so on.

The new chancellor of UC Davis. Chancellor Katehi, was completely disoriented during
the student protests, and the situation was controlled by Vanderhoef s thugs like Steven
Drown, Stephen Chilcott, and Lt. Matt Carmichael
What actually happened was that Lt. Pike became a UC Davis mascot. walking like a
prima ballerina with a pepper spray can and spraying seated students over and over, as if
he was expecting to be promoted to the rank of captain for his actions.

THE \.L%Y 31, 2012 ILLEGAL POWER PURCHASE AGREMEENT


AND THE FINAL SOLUTION

It was not a coincident that May 31, 2012 was the day I was targeted to he shot by the
UCDPD bribed cop. Li. James Barbour. and delivered to UCDMC Trauma Nursing Unit
t 11 or the UCDMC morgue. On that day, the partners in Vanderhoefs 1999-2003
$63.000,000 illegal power sales, the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, signed a new
power purchase agreement with Vanderhoef's mafia to resume illegal power sales for the
following 18 months.
It t was pure luck and God^ s v ill than 1 returned home on that"final solution day, alive
and in one piece, from the trip to UC Davis Medical Center. I think that it was very bad
day for Vanderhoef and his henchmen and very bad karma for Vanderhoef.
A few months later, in November 2012, Vanderhoef was delivered to UC Davis Medical
Center due to ischemic stroke. In November 2012. Vanderhoef was fighting for his life
and I was fighting his henchmen and the UC mafia to get my job back after 18 months of
terror and an attempt on my life.
Vanderhoef s hand-picked friend and henchmen-----the sexual predator. UC Davis
Associate Vice Chancellor Allan Tollefson—by his December 3, 2012, signature
legitimized the unlawful order of white-collar criminal and UC General Counsel Charles
Robinson to terminate may employment, which finally occurred on December 7, 2012.

The new, unlawful. Al Capone-style illegal gambling power sale from UC Davis
Medical Center's 27 MW cogeneration power plant, nicknamed the 65.000.000
Vanderhoef slot machine" ceased in December 2013, a few days after I filed a Writ of
Mandamus against the California Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board as the
Respondent and the Regents of the University of California as the Real Party of Interest,
in the Sacramento County Superior Court. on December 2. 2013. The case was docketed
under Case No. 34-2013-80001699-CU-WM-GDS, Jaroslaw Waszczuk v. California
Unemplovment Insurance Appeal Board and Real Party in Interest UC Davis Health
System.

In Deceiiiher 2013. the Honorable Shelicyanne Chang, was assigned to the Writ of
Mandate/CEQA in the Sacramento County Superior Court Department 24, effective
January 1, 2014. My Petition of the Writ of Mandamus was assigned automatically to
Hon. Chang in March 2014, after a summons was served to CUIAB and the Regents.
As I previously mentioned. before the Hon. Chang was appointed to the bench she
worked as California Governor Grey Davis's Deputy Chief Legal Secretary and she most
likely toured UCDMC Central Plant together with Grey Davis on February 14, 2001.
The illegal power sales were stopped in December 2013, most likely by order of new UC
President Janet Napolitano, the former United States Homeland Security Chief who is
still condoning Vanderhoef and his collaborators' crime, despite the fact that Ms.
Napolitano was informed about activities of the rotten and corrupt university
administrators and management on many occasions by certified US Mail, fax, and e-mail.

THE DEATH OF UC DAVIS CHANCELLOR EMERITUS LARRY


VANDERHOEF

UC Chancellor Emeritus Larry N. Vanderhoef died on Oct. 15, 2015, at UC Davis


Medical Center, due to complications of successive ischemic strokes. He was 74.
He died at UC Davis Medical Center, the place which was his legacy and the place where
his henchmen chose to execute me on May 31, 2012.
In October 2015, when Vanderhoef was dying in the UC Davis Medical Center, the UC
Regents' lawyers from Porter Scott law firm, together with Sacramento Superior Court
Judge Honorable David Brown, were struggling to keep secret his unlawful activities
related to illegal power sales from the UCDMC 27 MW cogeneration facility, nicknamed
"Vanderhoef s $65,000,000 slot machine."

If Vanderhoef had taken into consideration the illegal medical experiments conducted by
UC Davis Medical Center's 2l century Dr. Mengeles like Dr. Claire Pomeroy,Dr.
Rudolph Schrot Dr, Paul Muizellar, Dr. Klea Bertakis and their commandant Ann
Madden Rice —which caused many patient deaths and hundreds of lawsuits for medical
malpractices against UC Davis Medical Center in Sacramento County Superior Court—
before he was admitted to UC Davis Medical Center to be treated for ischemic strokes,
maybe he would have chosen a different medical facility for his treatment and maybe he
would be alive today. UC Davis's Mengeles almost killed me in 2005 when I was
admitted to the UCDMC emergency room. I have it documented. My coworker
experienced treatment at UCDMC after which could only sleep in a sitting position for

23
six months after the simple medical procedure. Somebody should take a look at
Vanderhoef's medical record, especially as he was attached to the white collar crime and
knew many names. It is was not coincident that after the Vanderhoef s death on October
15, 2015 the UC Regents in November settled the Keyzer case abandoned the appeal
which was filed on December 5. 2014 at same time as Regents filed SLAPP motion in
my wrongful termination case
Janet Keyzer's case was related to the 2007 illegal S5.5 million research project
involving human subjects in San Quentin State Prison. The project was entitled
"Community Oriented Pain-Management Exchange Program" (COPE). Vanderhoef
Yudof and Dr, Klea Bertakis escaped punishment for their involvement and approval of
the crime due Special Motion to Strike under Code of Civil Procedure § 426.16(e)(2)
(Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP)) instead of be investigated and
punished for the crime. If Vanderhoef would still alive and the Keyzer's case would
happened today than it would a completely different case.

If I would add to the above how the Vanderhoef destroyed a former UC Davis doctoral
genetics student Howard Zochlinski's life than the picture of Vanderhoef' portrayed by
the memorial ceremony in UC Davis Modavi' s Center Jackson Hall on December 5.
2015 does not correspondent with the facts . (see enclosure)

In a video-recording of a beautiful memorial ceremony on November 5. 2015, speakers


referenced the Mondavi Center as one of Vanderhoef's greatest achievements during his
15 years as chancellor, so it was especially fitting when his daughter. Susanne
Vanderhoef, sang a Bach aria to honor her father, and conductor emeritus D. Kern
Holoman took up his baton to lead the UCD Symphony Orchestra in a prelude and
postlude.
Watching the video and reading newspaper articles about the ceremony. I noticed that
none of the UC Regents attended the memorial of Larry Vanderhoef, chancellor of UC
Davis for 15 years. Neither former UC President Mark Yudof nor present UC President
Janet Napolitano attended the memorial, and no words from them about Chancellor
Vanderhoef s achievements or condolences to his family were read by the memorial
service speakers during the ceremony. I found it strange and unusual.

I found it even stranger that U.S Congressman Hon. John Garamendi honored UC
Chancellor Larry Vanderhoef on the floor of the U.S. Congress. on October 27. 2015,
with the following words:

• Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize Larry Neil Vanderhoef, a long-serving


Chancellor at the University of California, Davis. On October 15, Larry passed
away at age 74. I was fortunate to call him my friend, and he will truly be missed.
I am deeply honored to have known Chancellor Larry Neil Vanderhoef and to pay
tribute to a great visionary who dedicated his life to public service and to the
people of Davis. There is little doubt that Chancellor Vanderhoef' s presence was

24
felt throughout the entire community. He left a remarkable legacy, which will not
soon be forgotten. It is my sincere hope that the students and faculty at UC Davis
will embody the Chancellor's spirit and continue to carry his legacy with them
throughout their lives. It is leaders like Chancellor Vanderhoef who inspire change
and make the most impact on those around them.

I found it strange that Chancellor Vanderhoef's achievements were recognized on the


floor of the U.S. Congress in Washington, DC but no words were said about Chancellor
Vanderhoef' s 25 years of leadership and achievements at UC Davis on the California
Senate and Assembly floors located 25 miles from UC Davis and three miles from the
UC Davis Medical Center. (see enclosure)

CONCLUSION

As a lawful resident of the State of California and the United States of America, which
granted me political asylum due to my political activities against the communist regime
in my native Poland in 1980-198. I am asking the Presiding Judge of the Sacramento
County Superior Court the foll owing:

To stop the discrimination against me carried out by Court personnel and to allow me
equal access to justice as would be granted to any other litigant according to law and the
California Court Rules.
I am not asking for any favors or for special treatment from the Court because I am self-
represented litigant.
However, I am asking the Court not to provide preferential treatment for my adversaries
and their lawyers because the University of California. is interconnected with state
agencies and slate government.

I already pointed out what I experienced in the Sacramento County Superior Court from
the two judges and court personnel who unlawful!-y collaborated against me with the
personnel in the Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, and the attorneys from the
Porter Scott law firm representing the University of California. I view these as criminal
activities that could cause someone to die or spend his life in prison if a the accused party
were to represent himself in a criminal case on the appeal.

I believe that the Presiding Judge will agree with me that it did not require much time
almost one year for the Clerk of the Superior Court to transfer the designated record on
appeal to the Appellate Court.

I believe that the Presiding Judge will agree with me that it should not have been
necessary for me to write letters in order for to the Superior Court clerk to transfer the
record on appeal or to file in the Appellate Court several motions to force the clerks to

25
transfer the record on appeal to the Appellate Court. The motions were addressed to the
Presiding Justice of the Court of Appeal but were routinely denied by the clerk's stamp or
signature of the Presiding Justice, who most likely never saw the motions and signed
meaningless orders given to him by clerk. This how I see this evil, corrupt scheme to
harm me and derail the appeal after I spent almost one year struggling to get my record
on appeal and my appellate briefs to the Court of Appeal Justices.

I \\ould also appreciate it if the Presiding Judge would take a look at the Honorable
Shellevanne Chang, who was assigned to my Petition for Writ of Mandamus in March
2014 right after lion. Chang was the subject of a Plaintiff's Peremptory Challenge in
Keyzer's wrongful termination case against the same Regents of the University of
California as named in my wrongful termination case and the Real Party of Interest in the
Petition for Writ of Mandate case. (See enclosed complaint against Hon. Chang.)

My wrongful termination case is not yet concluded and I am waiting for the SLAPP
motion resolution by the Court of Appeals to file my 295-page Third Amended
Complaint (TAC) with only two causes of action. My intention to file the TAC in
September 2015 was blocked by order of the Honorable David Brown.
I am concerned that my dismissed attorney Douglas Stein—who was friends with
Honorable David Brown for 20 years—may have attempted, together with UC Regents
Counsel Michael Pott, to bribe Honorable David Brown in the period from September 1,
2014 to December 16, 2014.
I fired Douglas Stein on December 16, 2014 UC Regents counsel Michel Pott, who was a
major shareholder in Porter Scott, quit or got fired one hour after I filed my opposition to
the UC Regents (over 400 pages) on January 23, 2015. Michael Poll is a famous attorney
who established Supreme Court precedence for the UC management to avoid being sued
in Vergos v. McNeal, 53 (Cal.Rptr.3d 647, 146 Cal.App.4th 1387 (Cal.App. Dist.3
01/23/2007)
CCP § 425.16. Michael Poll is not working for any law firm and not doing the job he
loved. Michael Pott as a very experienced attorney should never agree to go to court with
Douglas Stein on December 17, 2014 up front of Honorable David Brown knowing that I
fired Stein on December 16, 2014. In my December 17, 2014 e-mail I wrote to Michael
Poll that I will SLAPP him back for his SLAPP motion he filed in collaboration with
Douglas Stein and Hon. David Brown on December 1, 2014 to destroy my wrongful
termination lawsuit and my life in attempt to cover up Vandderhoef' s and his henchmen
crimes.

Pro
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 29th day of August 2016, at Lodi, California.

ectfully Su1

Waszczuk, In Pro Per

CC. Hon. Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye- California Chief Justice -Supreme Court


Hon. Vance V. Raye - Presiding Justice 3DCA
Hon. Dianne Feinstein -US Senator
Hon. John Garamendi -US Congressman

27
Jaroslaw "Jerry" Waszczuk
2216 Katzakian Way
Lodi, CA 95242
Phone: 209-339-1982
Cell: 209-663-2977
Fax: 209-370-8281
Email: jjw1980live.com
Twitter: @Vashchookl 980

September 1, 2016

Elizabeth R. Parker, Executive Director/CEO


The State Bar of California
180 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-1639

SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO YOUR LETTER DATED AUGUST 26, 2016


THE UNRESOLVED BY THE CALIFORNIA STATE BAR COMPLAINT
AGAINST ATTORNEY AT LAW DOUGLAS E. STEIN—CASE
NUMBER: 15-0-10110. SUBMITTED IN DECEMBER 2014.

Dear Director Parker,

On January 14, 2015, the abovementioned case was assigned by California State Bar
Supervising Senior Trial Counsel Robert A. Henderson to Investigator Amanda Gormley
under direct supervision of Senior Trial Counsel Robin Brune (see enclosed letter from
Robert Henderson dated January 14, 2015).

I appreciate that you took a few minutes and responded to my multiple inquiries I sent to
the California State Bar to find out why my complaint against attorney Douglas E. Stein
has not been resolved.

More specifically, I am interested in what happened to my complaint, which has been


pending since December 2014 and suddenly disappeared in October 2015, together with
the California State Bar Investigator Amanda Gormley, who informed me by an e-mail
dated September 25, 2015, that by October 9, 2015, my complaint against Douglas Stein
would be submitted to the California State Bar prosecutor.

I waited with patience until January 2016 for news from the State Bar prosecutor or from
State Bar Investigator Amanda Gormley whether my complaint was actually sent to the
State Bar prosecutor because Ms. Gormley informed me on September 25, 2015, that I
would receive a separate letter about submitting the case to the prosecutor.

CALIFORNIA STATE BAR


DIRECTOR ELIZABETH R. PARKER
Something must have happened, as I did not receive a response from Ms. Gormley, and
she vanished together with my complaint after her September 25, 2015, e-mail.

I waited again for a few months, and in May 2016, I again sent an inquiry to Ms.
Gormley to find out what happened to my complaint against Douglas Stein. In response
to my inquiries, I received an e-mail from Ms. Gormley's supervisor, Laura Sharek, who
made up some story out of the blue that completely did not correspond with Ms.
Gormley's September 25, 2015, information that my complaint would be submitted to the
State Bar prosecutor by October 9, 2015.

On June 7, 2016, I responded to Ms. Laura Sharek's e-mail by a very specific letter that
was cc-ed like any other of my correspondence in this matter to State Bar Supervising
Senior Trial Counsels Robert Henderson and Robin Brune, who are or were responsible
for overseeing my complaint, and the letter was cc-ed to your office.
On July 11, 2016, after more than one month waiting for the response from Ms. Laura
Sharek, I sent to you another short letter (enclosed) to find out what the fate of my
complaint was and inquired about whether my complaint would be resolved, and as
usual, you, like the others, ignored my inquiry.

I think I am playing a fair game as a victim and complainer, and the stake is my $20,000
that Douglas Stein wasted for his personal pleasure or whatever.
Also, I think that I fully utilized steps with the State Bar's Office of the Chief Trial
Counsel to find out what is going on with my complaint, and I am being ignored.

You are the State-Bar-of-California-appointed executive director and CEO, and it is the
duty of you and those who appointed you to find out what happened to my complaint
after almost two years since I filed it as well as what happened to Investigator Amanda
Gormley, who was assigned to the complaint and vanished in October 2015.

You, as an executive director, should find out what is going on for the sake of avoiding
speculation and accusations. In your letter dated August 26, 2016, you were washing your
hands to avoid any responsibilities as State Bar executive director and CEO.
I am not asking you to be the State Bar prosecutor, State Bar court or State Bar chief trial
counsel.
I am asking to find out what the State Bar investigator, two supervising senior trial
counsels, State Bar prosecutor and State Bar court did to my case and why it is not
resolved and why they are irresponsive. This is your job as executive director and CEO,
and if you can't handle such a simple task or you are following the path of the others
mentioned in this letter, I have no choice but to remind you that you are executive
director and CEO of the California State Bar, and you have responsibility as a public
servant.

CALIFORNIA STATE BAR


DIRECTOR ELIZABETH R. PARKER
Your cover letter dated April 29, 2016, addressed to Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye,
Governor Brown, Senator de Leon, Assemblyman Rendon, Senator Jackson,
Assemblyman Stone, members of the Senate Judiciary Committee and members of the
Assembly Judiciary Committee with an attached Annual Discipline Report of the State
Bar of California for 2015, as required by the Business and Professions Code, section
6086.15 in documentation of the State Bar's public protection efforts in the operation of
its attorney discipline system, is not leaving you any room to argue that you are not
responsible for finding out what happened to my cases against my crooked lawyer who
cheated me out of $20,000, besides other things.

If you read into my August 30, 2016, letter addressed to the Sacramento County Superior
Court presiding judge Honorable Kevin Cuihane, then you will find that my cases against
Douglas Stein are about a little more than my $20,000. If you would like to be involved
in the cover-up of the criminal activities of the corrupted University of California
administrators and white-collar criminals, then be my guest. One of those rotten by
corruption is UC General Counsel Charles Robinson's Deputy Chief Karen Jensen
Petrulakis, who has served on the State Bar's Litigation Section Executive Committee
since September 2012.

The white-collar criminal UC General Counsel Charles Robinson planted Karen Jensen
Petrulakis in the State Bar in October 2012 after he ordered termination of my
employment with UC Davis Medical Center in September 2012 (see State Bar PRA
request dated 8/3/2015).

If you read the attached three appellate briefs from the Case C079524 Waszczuk v.
Regents et al., then you will find that the UC General Counsel Charles Robinson and his
gang are trying to resolve their white-collar crimes and the complaint against Douglas
Stein in the State Bar by the SLAPP motion. The crimes include but are not limited to
$65,000,000 cash disappearance made from illegal power sales in 1999-2003 and 2012-
2013. The Stein case and the SLAPP motion are examples of UC white-collar criminals
and their influence in the State Bar and other state agencies, which I have undoubted proof
and evidence of.

In conclusion of this letter, I believe that in October 2015, my complaint with the
California State Bar against Douglas Stein vanished together with State Bar Investigator
Amanda Gormley because, most likely, Amanda Gormley found that Douglas Stein,
together with the UC attorney from Porter Scott law firm, Michael Pott, attempted to bribe
or bribed the Sacramento County Superior Court judge Honorable David Brown. I
covered this subject in my mentioned 30-page letter to Sacramento County Superior Court
Presiding Judge Kevin Cuihane.

3
CALIFORNIA STATE BAR
DIRECTOR ELIZABETH R. PARKER
The SLAPP motion pending in the Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District will not
resolve Stein's case pending in in California State Bar nor disappearance of the$ 65,000,
000. from the illegal power sale and related to the multimillion dollars' state and the
federal tax fraud committed by UC the white collar criminals.

cer .

J slaw Waszczuk

CC:
• Hon. Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye- California Chief Justice -Supreme Court
• Hon. John Garamendi -US Congressman
• Hon. Jerry McNerney -US Congressman
• Hon. Anthony Rendon -California Assembly Speaker and other CA legislators
• Hon. Kevin De Leon - California Senate President pro Tempore and other
legislators
• Office of California Governor Jerry Brown -Constituent Affairs
• Hon. Erica R. Yew - Commission on Judicial Performance
• Hon. Kamala Harris -California Attorney General
• Elaine M. Howle - California State Auditor
• U.S Department of Justice
• Federal Bureau of Investigation
• US Treasury Inspector General
• California Tax Recovery and Criminal Enforcement - Complaint #28268

Enclosed:
• Copy of the letter to State Bar Supervisor Laura Sharek dated June 7, 2016;
• AOB , RB and ARB in Case C079524 ( SLAPP Motion)
• August 30, 2016 letter to the Presiding Judge Hon. Kevin Cuihane April 29, 2016
Elizabeth R. Parker letter to Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye, Governor Brown,
Senator de Leon, Assemblyman Rendon, Senator Jackson, Assemblyman Stone,
Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee and Members of the Assembly
Judiciary Committee
• 8/3/2015 E-Mail from Rachel Grunberg (State Bar PRA Re: Karen Jensen
Petrulakis)
• 1/14/2015 Letter from California assigning Amanda Gormley to the investigation
complaint against Douglas Stein
rd
CALIFORNIA STATE BAR
DIRECTOR ELIZABETH R. PARKER
THE STATE BAR OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
OF CALIFORNIA Elizabeth Rindskopf Parker, Executive Director

180 HOWARD STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-1617 Tel: (415) 538-2275 Fax: (415) 538-2305
E-mail: elizabeth.parker@calbar.ca.gov

August 26, 2016

Jaroslaw "Jerry" Waszczuk


2216 Katzakian Way
Lodi, CA 95242

RE: State Bar of California Correspondence

Dear Mr. Waszczuk:

This is a response to your email, faxes and USPS mail communications to various
people in Sacramento, employees of the State Bar of California Office of Trial Counsel
and me.

Please be advised that the exclusive and sole authority to receive, investigate and
prosecute claims of professional misconduct against California lawyers is vested in the
State Bar's Office of the Chief Trial Counsel. The sole and exclusive authority to
adjudicate such claims is vested in the State Bar Court. These areas serve the
California Supreme Court in performing these functions. As a result, neither the State
Bar's President, Officers, Board of Trustees, or the Executive Director have the
authority to involve themselves in individual complaints of the nature you describe in
your communications.

If you wish to address professional misconduct by California attorneys, please contact


the Intake unit of the Office of the Chief Trial Counsel. If you are addressing your
current issue, you are referred back to that office and their communications to you.

We regret that we could not be of further assistance to you.

Sincerely,

/Zcv,1cc'J
ElizabetIHindskopf Parker
Executive Director
THE STATE BAR
OFFICE OF TIlE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
OF CALIFORNIA Elizabeth R. Parker, Executive Director

180 HOWARD STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-1639


Tel: (415) 538-2275 Fax: (415) 538-2305
E-mail: Elizabethparker@calbarca.gov

April 29, 2016

Honorable Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye Honorable Jerry Brown


Chief Justice of California Governor of California
Supreme Court of California State Capitol, Suite 1173
455 Golden Gate Avenue Sacramento, CA 95814
San Francisco, CA 94102-3660

Honorable Kevin de Leon Honorable Anthony Rendon


Senate President pro Tempore Speaker of the Assembly
State Capitol, Room 205 State Capitol, Room 219
Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814

Honorable Hannah-Beth Jackson Honorable Mark Stone


Chair, Senate Committee on Judiciary Chair, Assembly Committee on Judiciary
State Capitol Room 2032 State Capitol, Room 5155
Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CS 95814

Dear Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye, Governor Brown, Senator de Leon, Assemblyman


Rendon, Senator Jackson, Assemblyman Stone, Members of the Senate Judiciary
Committee and Members of the Assembly Judiciary Committee:

Attached please find the Annual Discipline Report of the State Bar of California for 2015, as required
by Business and Professions Code, section 6086.15 in documentation of the State Bar's public
protection efforts in the operation of its attorney discipline system.

The attorney discipline system is the central component of the State Bar's public protection mission
and critical to achieving the objectives of California's regulatory and discipline system for lawyers.
The complaints against attorneys which it investigates and also prosecutes, when warranted, result in a
broad array of recommended sanctions for attorneys found culpable of misconduct.

Recognizing the importance of the Annual Discipline Report (ADR), the 2015 Audit of the Bureau of
State Auditors recommended greater involvement in its preparation by the State Bar Board of Trustees
to insure the accuracy, consistency and sufficiency of its data. Accordingly, in January 2016 the
Board of Trustees amended the charter of the Regulation and Discipline Committee to assign it the
responsibility for reviewing the report and its underlying discipline statistics, prior to review by the
full Board of Trustees. Thus, the attached report has been reviewed both by the Committee and the
full Board.
Annual Discipline Report
April 29, 2016

Page 2

The performance of the State Bar's discipline system is a crucial measure of its success as a public
regulatory agency and numerous statutory provisions proscribe the statistical reporting which is
designed to measure the system's performance. The attached Annual Discipline Report is a long-
standing vehicle for transmitting such objective statistical information about the activities and
performance of the discipline system to key stakeholders: the Legislature, the Governor, the Supreme
Court, and, of course, the public.

This year's Annual Discipline Report reflects progress in the State Bar's discipline system in that the
statutorily defined case backlog has been reduced, as has the time for filing complaints from
complaining witnesses in State Bar Court. In addition, although the number of filings in State Bar
Court has decreased as compared to 2014, the number of attorneys suspended or disbarred has
increased. Finally, the report adds a definitional section and explains the categories of data on which
the statutory framework requires reporting. Special effort has also been taken to ensure that readers
can compare data across a three year period and that changes in definitions are clearly presented and
explained. In this spirit of commitment to meaningful improvement in both report design and
substance, we worked with multiple stakeholders in the legislature, Bureau of State Audits and Office
of the Governor in structuring this year's report format. The attached report thus addresses and
includes the 2015 findings of the Bureau of State Auditors.

In preparing the report, the State Bar has focused significant effort to ensure that its performance in
measuring and reporting its disciplinary activities reflects the transparency, accountability and
excellence to which the State Bar's new leadership is committed. As explained below, however, we
also recognize that there have been shortcomings in data collection and reporting in the past. Work
remains to be done and the Board of Trustees has made this a high priority going forward.
Nonetheless, we believe that the attached report is much improved and is an important first step in
creating the excellent reporting system that California's public protection system deserves.

Among the problems in improving our reporting which have been identified is the failure of the State
Bar to develop a modern automated case management system (CMS). Without the tracking system
and forced conformity of data entry which modem case management systems provide, taking full
advantage of collected data for analysis and reporting is difficult, if not sometimes impossible.
Moreover, tracking large volumes of individual matters is both labor intensive and prone to human
error. The State Bar is committed to identifying a new CMS in 2016 to address these problems.

Professional staff are also important for managing such a system of data collection and analysis.
Regrettably, in 2015 the data collection required to produce the Annual Discipline Report was the
responsibility of a single part time contractor who was forced to rely on legacy systems which have
been difficult to interpret. While this data was validated to the extent possible by staff in both our
Information Technology Department and Office of the Chief Trial Counsel, the process was less than
optimal. To address this problem, in 2016, the State Bar's new management team has begun
consolidating the collection and analysis of data under the direction of one professionally staffed
office, the newly created Office of Research and Institutional Accountability (ORLk). This new office
will be staffed by moving data analysts now scattered about the agency into a single organization
which will be directed by an experienced researcher with extensive data collection and analysis
background in the California court system. ORIA will be responsible for gathering and reporting data
in future reports and will bring a professional accountability to the process, something missing in
2015.
Annual Discipline Report
April 29, 2016

Page 3

Other problems have also been identified by new management for correction in 2016. These include
the need to focus more resources on the problem of documenting unauthorized practice of law (UPL),
particularly in the immigrant community. Efforts to develop more effective ways to identify,
investigate and respond to UPL complaints are now underway and will receive heightened attention in
2016. A May Stakeholders Summit' will examine the problem of limited reporting and will be
followed by a second session focused on creating better systems of coordination with those law
enforcement authorities responsible for the criminal prosecution of UPL matters. In anticipation of
this second session, two members of the State Bar's Regulation and Discipline Committee have begun
meeting with law enforcement counterparts and are working to develop a protocol to support the
cooperation among those law enforcement authorities whose partnership with the State Bar is required
to insure that UPL complaints are thoroughly investigated and timely referred for prosecution by local
law enforcement authorities.

In conclusion, while progress has been made, we see this year's Annual Discipline Report as a
transitional document. In pointing out the problems of the past and plans for the future, we re-enforce
our commitment to both transparency and accountability. Nonetheless, the excellence we aspire to
achieve will require time and your help. In this regard, we welcome your advice and concrete ideas
for improving future reports so that they effectively reflect the accomplishments of California's
system of attorney discipline, widely recognized as the finest in the nation.

Respectfully,

Elizabeth R. Parker
Executive Director
State Bar of California
THE STATE BAR OFFICE OF THE CHIEF TRIAL COUNSEL
ENFORCEMENT
F CALIFORNIA Jayne Kim, Chief Trial Counsel
ISO HOWARD STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CAL FORNIA 94105-1639 TELEPHONE: (415) 535.2000
FAX (415) 535-2220
http://www.a1bucagov

DIRECT DIAL: (415) 538-2177

January 14, 2015

PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

Jaroslaw Waszczuk
2216 Katakkian Way
Lodi, CA 95240

Re: Respondent: Douglas E. Stein


Case Number: 15-0-10110

Dear Mr. Waszczuk:

Your complaint against attorney Douglas E. Stein has been reviewed and forwarded to the Enforcement Unit for
further investigation and prosecution, if warranted.

Please note the new case number above and refer to this number in all future correspondence.

I have assigned Investigator Amanda Gormley to investigate your complaint under the direct supervision of
Senior Trial Counsel Robin Brune. Please call your assigned investigator at (415) 538-2177 to schedule a
telephone interview appointment. If any of your contact information has changed, please inform the
investigator during your telephone interview.

To facilitate the investigation, we request your assistance in providing information and documents as set forth
below. in responding, please bear in mind that if you are not a client, some of the items may not apply to you and
you need not respond to those items. Also, if you have already provided any of the requested information and
documents with your complaint, then we already have that and you need not provide it again.

1. Please explain how you came to hire this attorney;

2. Please provide a copy of any retainer agreement between you and the attorney. If there was no written
agreement, please describe the services that the attorney was hired to perform and the fees and costs that
were to be paid;

3. Please describe the amount, type (cash, check, etc.), date and intended purpose of any payments that you
made to the attorney;

4. Please provide copies of the front and back of cancelled checks representing payments that you made to
the attorney, as well as copies of any receipts that you received for your payments;

5. Please describe what work the attorney actually did for you;
Jaros law Masicuk
January 14, 2015
Page 2

7, Please provide copies of all correspondence between you and the attorney and/or his or her office;

S. Please provide copies of any notes that you made regarding communications with the attorney and/or his
or her office;

9. Please provide copies of telephone bills showing calls made to the attorney and/or his or her office;

10. Please provide the name, address and telephone number of the opposing party and the attorney for the
opposing party, if any, in your matter;

It. If an insurance company is involved in this matter, please provide the name, address, and telephone
number of the insurance company and the claim number;

12. Please provide the copies of any settlement agreements and/or releases that you signed;

1. Please provide copies of any settlement distribution sheets and/or accountings provided to you by the
attorney or by his or her law office;

14, Please provide copies of any attorney or medical liens that you signed;

15. If a court date is involved, please provide the case number, the title of the case and the name and address
of the court in which the case was filed; and

16. Please provide copies of any court documents in your possession.

Please provide the information and documents requested above to Investigator Amanda Gormley within
fifteen (15) days of the date of this Letter. All documents that you send to the State Bar, whether copies or
originals, become State Bar property and are subject to destruction.

The State Bar has a Client Security Fund, which covers clients' loss of money or property resulting from Lawyer
dishonesty (but not because the lawyer acted incompetently, committed malpractice or failed to take certain
actions). For more information, please see the State Bar website
http;//www.calbar.ca. gov/Attorneys/LawyerRegulationJClientsecurjtyFuudaspx,

Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention, We Look forward to your continued assistance

Very truly yours.

Robert A. Henderson
Supervising Senior Trial Counsel

RAH1ad
STATE CAPITOL STANDING COMMITTEES
ROOM 2059
AGRICULTURE
SACRAMENTO. CA 95814
TEL 191616514005
FAX i916 651-4905
fltIiførnit tate nate CHAIR

INVASIVE SPECIES
CHAIR
5TOCIcTON OISTPICT OFFICE
31 EAST CHANNEL STREET
SENATOR BANKING AND FINANCIAL
SUITE 440 CATHLEEN GALGIANI INSTITUTIONS
STOCKTON, CA 95202
FIFTH SENATE DISTRICT BUSINESS. PROFESSIONS &
TEL 4209' 948-7930
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
FAX 12091 948-7993
GOVERNMENTAL
MODESTO DISTRICT OFFICE
ORGANIZATION
1010 10TH STREET
SUITE 5800 JOINT LEGISLATIVE AUDIT
MODESTO. CA 95354 COMMITTEE
TEL 1209) 576-6273
FAX 12091. 5766277 TRANSPORTATION &
HOUSING

SELECT COMMITTEE

MISSING AND
November 17, 2016 UNIDENTIFIED PERSONS
CHAIR

Jaroslaw"Jerry" Waszczuk
2216 Katzakian Way
Lodi, CA 95242

Dear Mr. Waszczuk.

Thank you for contacting my Stockton District Office regarding your concerns on the status of
your complaint dated September 13 and 152017.

I have asked Marian Norris, a member of my Stockton District Office, to look into your
concerns. Ms. Norris contacted Mrs. Parker, CEO of the California State Bar, regarding your
complaint against Attorney Douglas Stein to get a status on your complaint. Ms. Parker advised
Ms. Norris that your case was referred to the Ms. Laura Sherick. When Ms. Norris spoke to Ms.
Sherick, she was advised that the person filing the complaint is considered the witness and
consequently is not entitled to any information as it is considered confidential. Since the case is
still open you will be contacted when and if the case requires witness testimony. You will not be
contacted by her office for any other reason as witnesses need to remain uninfluenced by
investigative finding as it could taint testimony if need in the future.

To address your additional concerns; as per your phone conversation with Mrs. Norris, ongoing
litigation cannot be intervened by the Legislative Branch; but we do wish you luck in your
endeavors.

If you have any other state-related questions or experience additional challenges, please do not
hesitate to contact my Stockton District Office at (209) 948-7930.

Sincerely,

(rUt
Cathleen Galgiani
Senator, District 5

CG: rnhn
Jaroslaw "Jerry" Waszczuk
2216 Katzakian Way
Lodi, CA 95242
Phone: 209-339-1982
Cell: 209-663-2977
Fax: 209-370-8281
Email: jjw1980live.com
Twitter: @Vashchook1980

September 1, 2016

Elizabeth R. Parker, Executive Director/CEO


The State Bar of California
180 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-1639

SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO YOUR LETTER DATED AUGUST 26, 2016


THE UNRESOLVED BY THE CALIFORNIA STATE BAR COMPLAINT
AGAINST ATTORNEY AT LAW DOUGLAS E. STEIN—CASE
NUMBER: 15-0-10110. SUBMITTED IN DECEMBER 2014.

Dear Director Parker,

On January 14, 2015, the abovementioned case was assigned by California State Bar
Supervising Senior Trial Counsel Robert A. Henderson to Investigator Amanda Gormley
under direct supervision of Senior Trial Counsel Robin Brune (see enclosed letter from
Robert Henderson dated January 14, 2015).

I appreciate that you took a few minutes and responded to my multiple inquiries I sent to
the California State Bar to find out why my complaint against attorney Douglas E. Stein
has not been resolved.

More specifically, I am interested in what happened to my complaint, which has been


pending since December 2014 and suddenly disappeared in October 2015, together with
the California State Bar Investigator Amanda Gormley, who informed me by an e-mail
dated September 25, 2015, that by October 9, 2015, my complaint against Douglas Stein
would be submitted to the California State Bar prosecutor.

I waited with patience until January 2016 for news from the State Bar prosecutor or from
State Bar Investigator Amanda Gormley whether my complaint was actually sent to the
State Bar prosecutor because Ms. Gormley informed me on September 25, 2015, that I
would receive a separate letter about submitting the case to the prosecutor.

CALIFORNIA STATE BAR


DIRECTOR ELIZABETH R. PARKER
Something must have happened, as I did not receive a response from Ms. Gormley, and
she vanished together with my complaint after her September 25, 2015, e-mail.

I waited again for a few months, and in May 2016, I again sent an inquiry to Ms.
Gormley to find out what happened to my complaint against Douglas Stein. In response
to my inquiries, I received an e-mail from Ms. Gormley's supervisor, Laura Sharek, who
made up some story out of the blue that completely did not correspond with Ms.
Gorrnley's September 25, 2015, information that my complaint would be submitted to the
State Bar prosecutor by October 9, 2015.

On June 7, 2016, I responded to Ms. Laura Sharek's e-mail by a very specific letter that
was cc-ed like any other of my correspondence in this matter to State Bar Supervising
Senior Trial Counsels Robert Henderson and Robin Brune, who are or were responsible
for overseeing my complaint, and the letter was cc-ed to your office.
On July 11, 2016, after more than one month waiting for the response from Ms. Laura
Sharek, I sent to you another short letter (enclosed) to find out what the fate of my
complaint was and inquired about whether my complaint would be resolved, and as
usual, you, like the others, ignored my inquiry.

I think I am playing a fair game as a victim and complainer, and the stake is my $20,000
that Douglas Stein wasted for his personal pleasure or whatever.
Also, I think that I fully utilized steps with the State Bar's Office of the Chief Trial
Counsel to find out what is going on with my complaint, and I am being ignored.

You are the State-Bar-of-California-appointed executive director and CEO, and it is the
duty of you and those who appointed you to find out what happened to my complaint
after almost two years since I filed it as well as what happened to Investigator Amanda
Gormley, who was assigned to the complaint and vanished in October 2015.

You, as an executive director, should find out what is going on for the sake of avoiding
speculation and accusations. In your letter dated August 26, 2016, you were washing your
hands to avoid any responsibilities as State Bar executive director and CEO.
I am not asking you to be the State Bar prosecutor, State Bar court or State Bar chief trial
counsel.
I am asking to find out what the State Bar investigator, two supervising senior trial
counsels, State Bar prosecutor and State Bar court did to my case and why it is not
resolved and why they are irresponsive. This is your job as executive director and CEO,
and if you can't handle such a simple task or you are following the path of the others
mentioned in this letter, I have no choice but to remind you that you are executive
director and CEO of the California State Bar, and you have responsibility as a public
servant.

2
CALIFORNIA STATE BAR
DIRECTOR ELIZABETH R. PARKER
Your cover letter dated April 29, 2016, addressed to Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye,
Governor Brown, Senator de Leon, Assemblyman Rendon, Senator Jackson,
Assemblyman Stone, members of the Senate Judiciary Committee and members of the
Assembly Judiciary Committee with an attached Annual Discipline Report of the State
Bar of California for 2015, as required by the Business and Professions Code, section
6086.15 in documentation of the State Bar's public protection efforts in the operation of
its attorney discipline system, is not leaving you any room to argue that you are not
responsible for finding out what happened to my cases against my crooked lawyer who
cheated me Out of $20,000, besides other things.

If you read into my August 30, 2016, letter addressed to the Sacramento County Superior
Court presiding judge Honorable Kevin Cuthane, then you will find that my cases against
Douglas Stein are about a little more than my $20000. if you would like to be involved
in the cover-up of the criminal activities of the corrupted University of California
administrators and white-collar criminals, then be my guest. One of those rotten by
corruption is UC General Counsel Charles Robinson's Deputy Chief Karen Jensen
Petrulakis, who has served on the State Bar's Litigation Section Executive Committee
since September 2012.

The white-collar criminal UC General Counsel Charles Robinson planted Karen Jensen
Petrulakis in the State Bar in October 2012 after he ordered termination of my
employment with UC Davis Medical Center in September 2012 (see State Bar PRA
request dated 8/3/2015).

If you read the attached three appellate briefs from the Case C079524 Waszczuk v.
Regents et al., then you will find that the UC General Counsel Charles Robinson and his
gang are trying to resolve their white-collar crimes and the complaint against Douglas
Stein in the State Bar by the SLAPP motion. The crimes include but are not limited to
$65,000,000 cash disappearance made from illegal power sales in 1999-2003 and 2012-
20 The Stein case and the SLAPP motion are examples of UC white-collar criminals
and their influence in the State Bar and other state agencies, which I have undoubted proof
and evidence of.

In conclusion of this letter, I believe that in October 2015, my complaint with the
California State Bar against Douglas Stein vanished together with State Bar Investigator
Amanda Gormley because, most likely, Amanda Gormley found that Douglas Stein,
together with the UC attorney from Porter Scott law firm, Michael Pott, attempted to bribe
or bribed the Sacramento County Superior Court judge Honorable David Brown. I
covered this subject in my mentioned 30-page letter to Sacramento County Superior Court
Presiding Judge Kevin Cuihane,

3
CALIFORNIA STATE BAR
DIRECTOR ELIZABETH R. PARKER
The SLAPP motion pending in the Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District will not
resolve Stein's case pending in in California State Bar nor disappearance of theS 65,000,
000. from the illegal power sale and related to the multimillion dollars' state and the
federal tax fraud committed by UC the white collar criminals.

Jcer

J slaw Waszczuk

CC:
• Hon. Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye- California Chief Justice -Supreme Court
• Hon. John Garamendi -US Congressman
• Hon. Jerry McNerney -US Congressman
• Hon. Anthony Rendon -California Assembly Speaker and other CA legislators
• Hon. Kevin De Leon - California Senate President pro Tempore and other
legislators
• Office of California Governor Jerry Brown -Constituent Affairs
• Hon. Erica R. Yew - Commission on Judicial Performance
• Hon. Kamala Harris -California Attorney General
• Elaine M. Howle - California State Auditor
• U.S Department of Justice
• Federal Bureau of Investigation
• US Treasury Inspector General
• California Tax Recovery and Criminal Enforcement - Complaint #28268

Enclosed:
• Copy of the letter to State Bar Supervisor Laura Sharek dated June 7, 2016;
• AOB, RB and ARB in Case C079524 ( SLAPP Motion)
• August 30, 2016 letter to the Presiding Judge Hon. Kevin Cuihane April 29, 2016
Elizabeth R. Parker letter to Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye, Governor Brown,
Senator de Leon, Assemblyman Rendon, Senator Jackson, Assemblyman Stone,
Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee and Members of the Assembly
Judiciary Committee
• 8/3/2015 E-Mail from Rachel Grunberg (State Bar PRA Re: Karen Jensen
Petrulakis)
• 1/14/2015 Letter from California assigning Amanda Gormley to the investigation
complaint against Douglas Stein

CALIFORNIA STATE BAR


DIRECTOR ELIZABETH R. PARKER
THE STATE BAR OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
OF CALIFORNIA Elizabeth Rindkapf Parker, Executive Director

180 HOWARD STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-1617 Tel: (415) 538-2275 Fax: (415) 538-2305
E-mail: elizahethparkercalbatca.gov

August 26, 2016

Jaroslaw "Jerry" Waszczuk


2216 Katzakian Way
Lodi, CA 95242

RE: State Bar of California Correspondence

Dear Mr. Waszczuk:

This is a response to your email, faxes and USPS mail communications to various
people in Sacramento, employees of the State Bar of California Office of Trial Counsel
and me.

Please be advised that the exclusive and sole authority to receive, investigate and
prosecute claims of professional misconduct against California lawyers is vested in the
State Bar's Office of the Chief Trial Counsel. The sole and exclusive authority to
adjudicate such claims is vested in the State Bar Court. These areas serve the
California Supreme Court in performing these functions. As a result, neither the State
Bar's President, Officers, Board of Trustees, or the Executive Director have the
authority to involve themselves in individual complaints of the nature you describe in
your communications.

If you wish to address professional misconduct by California attorneys, please contact


the Intake unit of the Office of the Chief Trial Counsel. If you are addressing your
current issue, you are referred back to that office and their communications to you.

We regret that we could not be of further assistance to you.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth indskopf Parker


Executive Director
C.) CC
4) CA
2.2 a)
a)
-
cc
a

U
(I)

aw 0 DO
ci
C,)

co

05
D

a)
JC O
CD

Vo
C/) a: -
c 'et== a)
Cl) Wa) flU)>
<x
.,

•--.

6 000000c,
(IC

Er Lo
CD
C)
S
qp~ i(1..i.i fIJJui1
m o
0

C"
.. o
CO ("4 r2
Cf
,. __

WE a
C -0i C)
___________
C
ca -6a c vu.
0
E ......-(d) !
__

____
• m
.2 5EcD EN
ci) O4á ___

>CU i:
.i-'C 0
___
____ LI) ,
C:
— __ 0) • u
e

– e.. .
U
-. .
— W - -- a r e- a w- ' - J
CS)
r- —
Jaroslaw "Jerry" Waszczuk
2216 Katzakian Way
Lodi, CA 95242
Phone: 209-339-1982
Cell: 209-663-2977
Fax: 209-370-8281
Email: jjw19801ive.com
Twitter: @Vashchook 1980

September 15, 2016

Hon. Cathleen Galgiani


California Senator
Capitol Office
State Capitol, Room 2059
Sacramento, CA 95814

Stockton District Office


31 E. Channel, Suite 440
Stockton, CA 95202

Hon. Jim Cooper


California Assembly Member
Capitol Office
State Capitol
P.O. Box 942849
Room 5158
Sacramento, CA 94249-0009

District Office
9250 Laguna Springs Drive, Suite 220
Elk Grove, CA 95758

Subject: Request for assistance from your office regarding the California State Bar
investigation against Attorney-At-Law Douglas E. Stein and the complaint,
unresolved by the California State Bar, against said attorney—Case Number 15-0-
10110—that was submitted to the California State Bar in December 2014.

CALIFORNIA STATE BAR COMPLAINT


REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE
Dear Senator Galgiani and Assemblyman Cooper:

On September 14, 2016, at approximately 3 PM, the California State Bar Senior Trail
Counsel I Ms. Robin Brune called me and informed me that my case needed additional
time to be investigated. This information was contrary to California State Bar
Investigator Amanda Gormley, who informed me on September 25, 2015 that she had
concluded the investigation against attorney Douglas Stein and that the case would be
submitted to the California Bar prosecutor by October 9, 2015.
This was almost one year ago, and today, Robin Brune, who supervised the investigation,
has no explanation of what happened to my case, which disappeared together with
investigator Amanda Gormley in October 2015.

I appreciate if you intervene with Chief Trial Counsel Hon. Jayne Kim and the California
Chief Justice Hon. Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye to help resolve the complaint one way or
another. The California Chief Justice Hon. Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye was informed about
the case by my August 21, 2016, letter (enclosed). This what the California State is doing
is nothing but blunt conspiracy with the University of California rotten by corruption
administration to destroy my life which is already devastated to the point that Ms. Robin
Brune's yesterday's phone call was sounded like a poor taste Polish joke and hyena's
laugh at the scene of the dying prey.

The systematic destruction of my life by the University of California mafia is no different


than the devastation and destruction of the former California Senator Leland Yee's
existence and life by the same entity's lead by the former US Secretary of Homeland
Security Janet Napolitano. The coordinated assault against Senator Leland Yee and
myself began May 2011 for the same reason of which Senator Yee and myself was not
aware. I found out the reason after Senator Leland Yee was sentenced to five years in
federal prison. The Leland Yee's was sentenced after the death of the former UC Davis
Chancellor Emeritus Larry Vanderhoef who died on October 15, 2015. Vanderhoef took
lot of information and names to his grave.((See enclosed letter to US Congressman Hon.
John Garamendi) In October 2015 my complaint with the California State Bar against
attorney Douglas Stein disappeared together with complaint's investigator Amanda
Gormley.

In myMay ii, 2016, letter to United States Attorney Phillip A. Talbert entitled
"Assignment of the Former U.S Attorney for Northern District of California Melinda
Haag By The University Of California President Janet Napolitano to Investigate UC
Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi in Relation To My April 11, 2016, Request To Bring
Criminal Charges Against the Regents of the University Of California Due to

CALIFORNIA STATE BAR COMPLAINT


REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE
Multimillion Dollar Federal Tax Fraud And Violation Of My Civil And Human Rights I
wrote:
• With this letter I am following upon my inquiry dated April ii, 2016, with regard
to the alleged multimillion dollars' tax fraud committed in 1999-2003 and 2012—
2013 by the Regents of the University of California through an unlawful sale of
power from the UC Davis Medical Center 27 MW's cogeneration facility.
I understand that the U.S. Attorney for the northern California office covers a
large area and is very busy enforcing the law and prosecuting criminals, and I also
understand that the U.S. Attorney's Office in Sacramento is in a transition period
due to the resignation of the Hon. Benjamin Wagner

After I learned that Ms. Haag had been hired by UC to investigate UC


Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi, I became seriously concerned about Ms. Haag's
professional conduct due her conflict of interest while representing the UC
Regents in a dispute that arose from the university's adverse actions against UC
Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi, a former U.S. Attorney for northern California,
where the UC Regents' headquarters are located and where UC Davis is located as
well.
Furthermore, the UC Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi is or was also in charge of
the UC Davis Medical Center from 2009 to 2016, where the UC Regents' alleged
multimillion dollar fraud took place.

On May 5, 2016, I sent an e-mail to Ms. Haag informing her about my complaints
with the federal authorities, regardless of what Ms. Haag had been informed about
before I sent my e-mail to her.

I don't believe that the Regents hired Ms. Haag for $1200/hour to find out if UC
Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi had violated university policies and procedures.
This could have been determined fairly and more independently by an agreed-
upon third-party arbitrator or mediator, not the university attorney hired for whom
it was a conflict of interest to represent the university.

Furthermore I wrote in same letter:

• :It is also worth mentioning that Ms. Melinda Hag is the former U.S. prosecutor
who prosecuted and brought down California Senator Leyland Lee.
I am mentioning former Senator Leyland Yee's achievements in this complaint
because Leyland Yee authored Senate Bill SB 650, which was signed into law in
91
CALIFORNIA STATE BAR COMPLAINT
REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE
July 2010 with an effective date of January 1, 2011. This bill was signed into law
by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to protect UC faculty and staff who report
illegal or improper actions from retaliation in the workplace.
SB 650, which was authored by Senator Leland Yee, provides UC employees with
the same legal protections as other state employees, including those at California
State University and California's community colleges. The new law ensured that
UC employees could exercise their right to seek damages in court on a retaliation
complaint to which the university did not respond fairly.

Leyland Yee's SB 650 was a step forward, and without it the UC Davis employee
Janet Keyzer would not have prevailed in her termination lawsuit, which was filed
in 2010 and finalized in 2015. It cost the university about $5,000,000, most of
which were legal fees for attorneys on both sides.

(In the Janet Keyzer's whistleblowing wrongful termination case the three
individual defendants, the UC President Mark Yudof, UC Davis Chancellor
Larry Vanderhoef and the UC Davis professor Klea Bertakis were facing jail
time up to one year under the provision of the amended by the SB 650
Government Code 8547.10 (b) and (c). for their malicious oppression and
retaliation against Janet Keyzer and her husband.)

In my August 31,2016 letter addressed to US Congressman Hon. John Gannendi 11


wrote: (letter enclosed)
• The 2010 Vanderhoef s participation in investigation related to the Pacific Gas
and Electric (PG&E) maintained natural gas pipeline, explosion where 8 people
got killed, it t would be a last place where I would expect to see Vanderhoef
taking into consideration PG&E's participation in the Vanderhoef $ 65000,000
worth illegal power sale and tax fraud in 1999-2003 (letter enclosed)

I concluded my letter to US Attorney Phillip Talbert with words:

• It is sad that Leyland Yee, a great legislator and public servant who had the
courage to stand up against the corrupted but very powerful University of
California administration, fell shortly after SB 650 took effect in 2011.

The 67-year-old Yee had no choice but to plead guilty to racketeering charges in
connection with the allegations that he had accepted bribes in exchange for his
political influence. Five years in prison versa twenty years were convincing factor
to plead guilty.

4
CALIFORNIA STATE BAR COMPLAINT
REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE
However, if I look at the crimes Leyland Yee allegedly committed with help of the
FBI agents and for which he was harshly punished, I would say that his crimes are
not comparable with those committed by the corrupted and rotten University of
California administration, and no one there was sentenced to prison. The UC
administrators could drive employees to end their lives, commit Medicare and
Medicaid fraud up to $25,000,000, commit multimillion power sale and tax fraud,
conduct illegal medical experiments that resulted in several patients' deaths at the
UC Davis Medical Center, fund illegal research on prisoners (Keyzer's case) or
discharge machine oil via storm drains into the Sacramento River from the UC
Davis Medical Center Cogeneration Power Plant for seven years, but I have not
heard that anybody responsible for these crimes faced the District Attorney's
office or criminal prosecution like Leyland Yee faced for his crime.
I will write a petition to President Barack Obama and I will ask him to pardon
Senator Leyland Lee for humanitarian reasons or to shorten Senator Leyland Lee's
prison sentence.

UC President Janet Napolitano's action in March 2016 against the UC Davis Chancellor
Linda Katebi was a total well-crafted hoax to divert attention from Senator Yee's
prosecution and his sentencing at the same time.

It seems to have worked because five upset legislators joined UC President Janet
Napolitano and demanded, by submitting a supportive letter to Janet Napolitano, that UC
Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi should be fired. One legislator stated in his interview with
a newspaper that he would land in federal prison if he did what Chancellor Linda Katehi
has done, apparently making a reference to Senator Yee and two other California
legislators, Senator Ronald Calderon and Senator Rod Wright, who were investigated and
prosecuted at the same time as Senator Leland Yee.

After I read the March 26, 2013 unsealed 137-page Affidavit of Special FBI agent
Emmanuel v. Pascua in Support of the Complaint against Senator Leland Yee; the July
15 2015, 51-page Leland Yee's Plea Bargain the February 17, 2016, the United States
5,

sentencing Senator Leland Yee memorandum and the November 13, 2013 Notice of
Motion and Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Government Should Not Be Held In
Contempt for or Violation of Magistrate Judge's Order Sealing FBI Affidavit; and the
Request For Sanctions in the California Senator Ronald Calderon's case I came to the
conclusion that:

The former United States of America Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano
and her friend, the former United States of America Attorney from the Northern District
of California Melinda Haag and gangsters from the University of California are entirely
responsible for the destruction of California Senator Leland Yee's existence in order to
divert attention away from and thereby protect the University of California's white collar
criminals who are responsible for more serious crimes.

CALIFORNIA STATE BAR COMPLAINT


REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE
The California Senator Yee was molested for three years by FBI until he was attached to
some Chinese gang from the San Francisco Bay Area to make him criminal and to make
him disappear from California's political arena. It took the FBI almost three full years to
take the 65-year-old Californian Senator Yee down.

The FBI converted $70,000 of Leland Yee's debts from the San Francisco Mayoral
campaign into bribery, racketeering, money laundering, firearms, and dealings with a
terrorist organization in the Philippines, resulting in a five-year prison term. It is
unbelievable what the FBI is capable of Even former Speaker of the House Hon. Nancy
Pelosi did not believe that it could be true after Senator Yee was arrested and the
Affidavit of Special Agent Emmanuel V. Pascua in support of the complaint against
Senator Leland was unsealed two days after it was sealed and was then published to
discredit, humiliate, and prejudice the senator.

My two court cases and the California State Bar complaint against Douglas Stein are part
of a broader issue, and the corrupted California State Bar personnel have no desire to see
the complaint case against Douglas Stein resolved due to the apparent discovery by State
Bar Investigator Amanda Gormley in September 2015 that Douglas Stein, together with
University of California counsel, attempted to bribe the Sacramento County Superior
Court Judge Hon. David Brown. I described their criminal conduct in my 30-page
complaint letter to Sacramento County Superior Court Presiding Judge Hon. Kevin
Cuihane, which I believe I sent to your office by fax in August 2016. I have no other
explanation as to why my complaint and the California State Bar Investigator disappeared
in October 2015

I am working on the Clemency Petition for the State of California Former Senator Leland
Yee who is incarcerated in Fort Worth, TX, Federal Correctional Institution, Inmate
Register Number: 19629-111. I am hoping that President Barak Obama, before leaving
office, will pardon Leland Yee and will send him back to his family.

What was done to Leland Yee is like something from George Orwell's 1984 or Animal
Farm or like something from North Korean society with Kim Jung-Un in charge.

The complaint against Douglas Stein is a small part of the picture related to Leland Yee's
prosecution, but it is an important part.

I am quite sure of this, and I believe that California Attorney General Kamala , half of the
California government, Assembly Speaker John Perez and former Senate President pro
Tempore Darrel Steinberg are perfectly aware of what really happened to Leland Yee
and why.

No
CALIFORNIA STATE BAR COMPLAINT
REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE
I appreciate your help with resolving this matter.

i4ely, $:

Ja slaw aszczuk

CC: Hon. Jerry McNerney, U.S. Congressman


Speaker of the House Hon. Paul Ryan
State Auditor Elaine M. Howie
Senator Hon. Jerry Hill
Hon. Nancy Pelosi , U.S Congresswoman
Hon. Loretta Sanchez, U.S Congresswoman
Enclosed:
• August 21, 2016 copy of the letter to the California Chief Justice Hon. Tani G. Cantil-
Sakauye
• August 31, 2016 copy of the letter to US Congressman Hon. John Gararnendi.

7
CALIFORNIA STATE BAR COMPLAINT
REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE