You are on page 1of 12


(Department of International Relation)

Defense and Strategic Studies

Assignment of:

The Dangerous of Nuclear War

Submitted to: Assignment Made by:

Sir Aijaz Ahmed xxxxxx (0217-05)

Class : M.A. Final


1. Introduction
2. Definition
3. Background
4. Types of Nuclear War
5. Effects of Nuclear War
6. Causes of Nuclear war
7. Conclusion
8. References
Nuclear conflict isn't always a comfy issue. Throughout all the variations,
opportunities, and uncertainties that this have a look at describes, one subject
matter is steady—a nuclear struggle might be a disaster. A militarily potential
nuclear attack, even “confined,” can be predicted to kill people and to inflict
monetary harm on a scale unprecedented in American revel in; a massive-
scale nuclear alternate might be a calamity unprecedented in human history.

The thoughts recoils from the attempt to foresee the info of this type of
calamity, and from the cautious explanation of the unavoidable uncertainties
as to whether people could die from blast damage, from fallout radiation, or
from starvation at some stage in the subsequent winter. But the fact remains
that nuclear war is viable, and the possibility of nuclear struggle has shaped
part of the muse of international politics, and of u.S. Policy, ever considering
the fact that nuclear guns had been used in 1945.

The premise of this study is that those who address the huge troubles of
global politics ought to understand what is thought, and perhaps extra
importantly what is not known, approximately the probable consequences if
efforts to discourage and avoid nuclear warfare need to fail. Folks who
address coverage issues regarding nuclear guns must realize what such
weapons can do, and the volume of the uncertainties about what such
weapons may do.

A nuclear conflict is a struggle in which nations combat with nuclear guns. Due
to the fact nuclear guns are extraordinarily powerful and could cause
destruction during the world, the possibility of nuclear conflict has had a
wonderful impact on worldwide politics.

To this point, nuclear weapons were used at some stage in war. They had
been used within the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and
resulted within the deaths of approximately a hundred and twenty thousand
humans. Lots of a whole lot extra effective bombs had been made in later
years. They have got now not but been used in warfare.
Nuclear bombs were invented through the United States with Canadian and
British assist at some point of international struggle ii to assist make that
conflict stop. The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the soviet
invasion of Manchuria induced japan to give up. They may be still the handiest
nuclear weapons that have ever been used in fighting a conflict. At that time
most effective the United States had the era had to make the bomb, but within
some years the Soviet Union had developed it too. In the new cold warfare,
the US and the Soviet Union were enemies and every had many nuclear guns,
however they did not dare to apply them towards every other, either directly or
with the aid of attacking the other USA's allies. Seeing that either country may
be completely destroyed through the alternative's weapons, nuclear war
should now not be restrained to the usage of most effective one or bombs; if
they had been used everywhere by using one facet, the opposite might
assault with its very own nuclear guns, and the fighting could almost certainly
emerge as extra.

(The atomic bomb mushroom cloud over Nagasaki on

August 9, 1945)

Ever since the end of World War II, writers, film-makers, and artists have
created works of fiction imagining how a nuclear war might happen and what
life would be like afterwards.

Nuclear bombs were invented by means of the usa with canadian and british
help at some point of international battle ii to assist make that conflict forestall.
The destruction of hiroshima and nagasaki and the soviet invasion of
manchuria caused japan to give up. They're nevertheless the simplest nuclear
weapons that have ever been utilized in preventing a struggle. At that time
simplest the us had the technology had to make the bomb, but inside some
years the soviet 1union had developed it too. In the new cold warfare, the usa
and the soviet union have been enemies and each had many nuclear
weapons, however they did now not dare to apply them in opposition to each
different, either directly or by way of attacking the opposite united states's
allies. For the reason that both country could be completely destroyed with the
aid of the other's weapons, nuclear war ought to now not be restricted to using
only one or bombs; in the event that they were used anywhere by way of one
aspect, the other would attack with its very own nuclear guns, and the
preventing could almost clearly grow to be greater. This case got here to be
known as the "stability of terror," or mutually confident destruction, and
stopped conflicts among the two superpowers from main to a 3rd world

Since the stop of communist rule in russia and jap europe, tensions between
the us and russia have eased and battle has end up less in all likelihood.
However, these days there may be more fear approximately nuclear
proliferation. Nations around the arena who already have their personal
bombs encompass britain, france, china, israel, india, pakistan and north
korea; as all styles of generation have a tendency to emerge as cheaper and
simpler to get and use, there is a worry that nuclear guns should emerge as to
be had to international locations with unstable governments. There may be
also the opportunity that terrorists is probably capable of seize or build nuclear
guns and use them.
4.Types of Nuclear War:
The possibility of the usage of nuclear weapons in war is commonly divided
into subgroups, every with exclusive outcomes and potentially fought with one
of a kind styles of nuclear armaments.

Limited Nuclear War:

Restricted nuclear war is defined as “war in which every aspect physical
activities restraint within the use of nuclear guns, using most effective a limited
range of guns on selected goals.” decided on goals could consist of enemy
forces, command and control centers or specific sites of strategic significance.
Early advocates of limited nuclear war believed that the sort of conflict may be
both controllable and winnable. It became similarly idea that the confined use
of nuclear weapons in a small, local war ought to cause a fast political
decision of the struggle.
It's miles presumed that the sort of nuclear weapons maximum probable to be
hired in the course of a restrained nuclear struggle might be non-strategic
guns due to the fact using larger, strategic weapons could be disproportionate
with the goals of a constrained warfare. Non-strategic nuclear weapons are
relatively small-yield and limited-variety weapons designed to be used inside a
theater of operations as opposed to for intercontinental, or strategic,
employment. Non-strategic nuclear guns are also known as tactical guns
because of their intended use on a constrained scale. The tactical use of
nuclear weapons has been defined as “the use of nuclear weapons by means
of land, sea, or air forces in opposition to opposing forces, helping installations
or facilities, in help of operations that make a contribution to the
accomplishment of a navy venture of restrained scope, or in support of the
army commander’s scheme of mane ultraviolet, typically limited to the area of
navy operations.”

Full-Scale Nuclear War:

Complete-scale nuclear battle ought to consist of massive numbers of nuclear
weapons utilized in an assault aimed toward an entire u . S . A ., consisting of
military, economic, and civilian objectives. Such an assault might almost
genuinely break the entire economic, social, and military infrastructure of the
target kingdom, and might probably have a devastating effect on the earth's
5.Effects of Nuclear War:

The outcomes of a nuclear conflict that cannot be calculated are at the least
as critical as those for which calculations are attempted. Moreover, even those
constrained calculations are subject to very huge uncertainties.
Conservative army planners tend to base their calculations on factors that can
be both controlled or expected, and to make pessimistic assumptions where
manipulate or prediction are impossible. For example, making plans for
strategic nuclear battle looks at the extent to which civilian goals could be
destroyed through blast, and reductions the extra harm which may be caused
by fires that the blast could ignite. This isn't always because fires are unlikely
to purpose damage, however due to the fact the quantity of fire harm relies
upon on factors together with climate and information is of building production
that makes it an awful lot more difficult to expect than blast harm. Even as it's
far proper for a navy plan to provide for the destruction of key goals by means
of the top-rated approach even in damaging occasions, the non-army observer
need to understand that real harm is in all likelihood to be more than that
meditated within the navy calculations. That is particularly actual for oblique
outcomes inclusive of deaths because of accidents and the unavailability of
hospital treatment, or for economic harm because of disruption and
disorganization in place of from direct destruction.
For extra than a decade, the declared policy of the united states has given
prominence to a concept of “assured destruction:” the skills of u.S. Nuclear
guns have been described in terms of the extent of damage they can actually
inflict even inside the most adverse occasions. It ought to be understood that
within the occasion of an real nuclear battle, the destruction due to an all-out
nuclear assault would possibly be a long way extra. Further to the tens of
millions of deaths at some stage in the days and weeks after the assault, there
could likely be in addition tens of millions (possibly further tens of hundreds of
thousands) of deaths inside the resulting months or years. Further to the
tremendous financial destruction as a result of the actual nuclear explosions,
there would be a few years during which the residual financial system might
decline in addition, as stocks were fed on and machines wore out quicker than
recovered manufacturing should replace them. Nobody is aware of the way to
estimate the likelihood that industrial civilization might crumble in the regions
attacked; additionally, the possibility of giant long-time period ecological harm
cannot be excluded.
Importance of the Ozone Layer:

The sun emits mild or radiation at a big variety of energies or frequencies. An

awful lot of this radiation is absorbed by way of the earth's surroundings and
does not attain the floor. Human eyes have evolved to be extraordinarily
receptive to radiation in the so-referred to as visible spectrum which isn't
absorbed very tons at all via the atmosphere. On the violet, excessive-strength
quit of this band of transmitted mild lies what is known as ultraviolet light.
Ultraviolet light with excessive energies is strongly absorbed by way of
molecular oxygen - the oxygen we breathe - in the proper environment. This
absorption can purpose the molecular oxygen to break into oxygen atoms
each of which in turn can react with different molecular oxygen to shape
ozone, a compound made up of 3 oxygen atoms. In flip, ozone strongly
absorbs ultraviolet light itself, together with ultraviolet with energies decrease
than that absorbed with the aid of molecular oxygen. Small quantities of
ultraviolet may be useful, mainly in forming nutrition d in the pores and skin.
But huge amounts may be harmful, especially of the greater energetic
ultraviolet, causing sunburn and skin cancer in human beings and adversely
affecting the growth of many plant life. Many scientists trust that tons of
organic evolution passed off beneath the protecting ultraviolet protect of higher
atmospheric ozone.

The effects of nuclear war on climate:

A first-rate nuclear conflict might deposit millions of tones of dust within the
stratosphere. Some daylight might be absorbed or pondered far from the earth
through the dust, causing a lower inside the earth's temperature. This in flip
should conceivably cause a prime climatic alternate. As an instance, lowered
temperatures could cause an growth in snow and ice close to the polar caps,
therefore an multiplied mirrored image of mild, and similarly reducing of
Stratospheric dust from a nuclear war appears not going to purpose such
climatic exchange. In 1883 the volcanic eruption at krakatoa deposited some
10 to one hundred thousand million tones of dust inside the stratosphere, and
the 1963 mt agung eruption approximately half as tons. These injections seem
to have prompted a minor cooling of the floor temperature of the earth, at
maximum approximately half of a degree celsius, lasting a few years, and not
using a long time results. A nuclear conflict concerning 4000mt from gift
arsenals would likely deposit tons less dust within the stratosphere than both
the krakatoa or mt agung eruptions.
Any other possibility is that decreases in ozone or increases in oxides of
nitrogen ranges inside the stratosphere, caused by nuclear warfare, could
result in climatic trade. A discount in ozone degrees via a component of
should reason a decrease in surface temperature of 1 1/2 to 1 degree
centigrade, however which include oxides of nitrogen within the calculation
reduces this effect. Whether or no longer a exchange in temperature at the
earth's surface through this amount for some years ought to cause irreversible
climatic alternate is hard to evaluate. The national academy of sciences
examine concluded that the consequences of dust and oxides of nitrogen
injection into the stratosphere 'would probably lie inside ordinary international
climatic variability, but the opportunity of climatic adjustments of a greater
dramatic nature cannot be dominated out'. For the reason that academy
assumed a nuclear conflict with the explosion of many extra high-yield guns
than are presently deployed, the chance of climatic exchange from dirt or
oxides of nitrogen is nearly absolutely much less than assessed of their
Fires and smoke:

Nuclear attacks could ignite severa fires in cities, industry and mainly in
forests, crop areas and oil and gasoline fields. Those fires could produce
immense amounts of particulate depend which might continue to be inside the
decrease environment for weeks even after the fires ceased. The smaller
debris, known as aerosols, could take in sunlight. A large nuclear battle with
many fires and massive aerosol manufacturing could result in a discount in
sunlight within the mid-northern hemisphere with the aid of ninety in keeping
with cent or more for a duration of a few months. This reduction would pose no
direct threat to human health, however indirect consequences might be big. If
the nuclear struggle took place all through the agricultural developing season
of the northern hemisphere, meals production could be clearly removed for
that season.
6.Causes Of Nuclear War:

A nuclear struggle could take area in more approaches than you might think,
sparked by way of any number of occurrences from a pure twist of fate to an
intentional strike.
Nuclear struggle, the trade of nuclear guns among or greater states in open
conflict. It’s unthinkable. It may’t appear. Of direction, nuclear struggle is
extremely not going. The fact of the matter is that world nuclear inventories,
led through discounts within the united states of america and russia, have by
no means been lower, and not one of the foremost powers expects a nuclear
warfare inside the way they did during the cold war. To crib a line from captain
jack sparrow, however, nuclear conflict isn't always impossible, it’s
unbelievable, and a nuclear battle may want to take region in more methods
than you may think, sparked by using any number of occurrences from a
natural coincidence to an intentional strike.
The worst mistake to make approximately nuclear weapons is to believe that
they're ordinary hands, available for navy use like any other. (that is
sometimes called the “conventionalizing” of nuclear weapons.) the second one
worst mistake, however, is to agree with that nuclear weapons are magic,
and that the use of them solves issues that are in any other case politically or
strategically intractable. This 2d blunders is what leads human beings into
thinking about things like “demonstration photographs” or nuclear shows of
force, in which a nuclear weapon is exploded near, but no longer in, a conflict.
A nuclear display of pressure rests completely on the hope that enemy leaders
will honestly see an illustration shot for what it's far and not overreact. But
misperception is a key a part of worldwide members of the family, and it's far
pure folly to expect that a nuclear explosion will have a clarifying, in place of a
panicking, impact at the enemy.

We've got considered the problems of big-scale nuclear battle from the
perspective of the international locations not underneath direct attack, and the
difficulties they may encounter in postwar recuperation. It's far actual that most
of the horror and tragedy of nuclear struggle might be visited on the
populations subject to direct assault, who could likely should address intense
and perhaps insuperable barriers in looking for to reestablish their own
societies. It's far no much less obvious, however, that different countries,
together with the ones remote from the combat, may want to suffer closely
because of harm to the global environment.
Finally, at least quick mention need to be product of the global consequences
resulting from disruption of economic activities and communications. Due to
the fact that 1970, an growing fraction of the human race has been dropping
the struggle for self-sufficiency in food, and ought to depend on heavy imports.
A chief disruption of agriculture and transportation within the grainexporting
and production nations could accordingly show disastrous to nations importing
food, farm equipment, and fertilizers--especially the ones which can be
already suffering with the danger of fullsize starvation. Furthermore, surely
each economic area, from food and medicines to gas and increase
engendering industries, the less-advanced international locations would locate
they could not depend upon the "undamaged" the rest of the evolved world for
trade necessities: within the wake of a nuclear conflict the industrial powers
directly worried might themselves ought to compete for sources with the ones
international locations that these days are described as "less-developed."
In addition, the disruption of international communications--satellites, cables,
or even high frequency radio links--could be a main impediment to global
recovery efforts. In attempting to mission the after-outcomes of a prime
nuclear battle, we've got taken into consideration one after the other the
numerous forms of harm that might occur. It's also pretty possible, but, that
interactions might take vicinity amongst these outcomes, so that one form of
damage would couple with some other to produce new and sudden dangers.
For example, we are able to check in my view the effects of heavy worldwide
radiation fallout and improved sun ultraviolet, but we do not realize whether
the 2 performing together might substantially increase human, animal, or plant
susceptibility to sickness. We are able to conclude that huge dust injection into
the stratosphere, even more in scale than krakatoa, is unlikely through itself to
supply sizeable climatic and environmental change.
The Art of war (Sun Tzu,1999)