50 Vaccine Studies For The Critical Thinker

How to Use This Guide
Study 1: “Temporal Association of Certain Neuropsychiatric Disorders Following Vaccination of
Children and Adolescents: A Pilot Case–Control Study"
Study 2: “Relative trends in hospitalizations and mortality among infants by the number of
vaccine doses and age, based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System”
Study 3: “Effects of diphtheriatetanuspertussis or tetanus vaccination on allergies and
allergyrelated respiratory symptoms among children and adolescents in the United States.”
Study 4: “Sudden infant death following hexavalent vaccination: a neuropathologic study.”
Study 5: "Comparison of VAERS fetalloss reports during three consecutive influenza seasons"
Study 6: “Effectiveness of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in influenzarelated
hospitalization in children: a casecontrol study.”
Study 7: "Increased risk of noninfluenza respiratory virus infections associated with receipt of
inactivated influenza vaccine."
Study 8: “Is infant immunization a risk factor for childhood asthma or allergy?”
Study 9: "DTP with or after measles vaccination is associated with increased inhospital
mortality in GuineaBissau."
Study 10: "Infection, vaccines and other environmental triggers of autoimmunity."
Study 11 of 50: “SelfOrganized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity”
Study 12: “Transverse myelitis and vaccines: a multianalysis.”
Study 13: “Simian virus 40 and human cancer.”
Study 14: “Immunization Safety Review: SV40 Contamination of Polio Vaccine and Cancer.”
Study 15: “New developments about the association of SV40 with human mesothelioma.”
Study 16: “Endogenous retroviruses as potential hazards for vaccines”
Study 17: “Vaccines, adjuvants and autoimmunity.”
Study 18: “New QualityControl Investigations on Vaccines: Micro and Nanocontamination”
Study 19: “Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 19972002.”
Study 20: “Polio programme: let us declare victory and move on.”
Study 21: “Detection and characterization of pestivirus contaminations in human live viral
vaccines.”

Study 22: “Serologic response to porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV1) in infants vaccinated with the
human rotavirus vaccine, Rotarix™: A retrospective laboratory analysis.”
Study 23: “Persistence of Measles Antibodies After 2 Doses of Measles Vaccine in a
Postelimination Environment”
Study 24: "'ASIA' autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants."
Study 25: “Lessons learnt in Japan from adverse reactions to the HPV vaccine: a medical ethics
perspective”
Study 26: "A twophase study evaluating the relationship between Thimerosalcontaining
vaccine administration and the risk for an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis in the United
States”
Study 27: "A positive association found between autism prevalence and childhood vaccination
uptake across the U.S. population."
Study 28: “Methodological Issues and Evidence of Malfeasance in Research Purporting to Show
Thimerosal in Vaccines Is Safe”
Study 29: "What is regressive autism and why does it occur? Is it the consequence of
multisystemic dysfunction affecting the elimination of heavy metals and the ability to regulate
neural temperature?"
Study 30: "Increased Susceptibility to EthylmercuryInduced Mitochondrial Dysfunction in a
Subset of Autism Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines"
Study 31: "Nonlinear doseresponse of aluminium hydroxide adjuvant particles: Selective low
dose neurotoxicity."
Study 32: "Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism?"
Study 33: "Hypothesis: conjugate vaccines may predispose children to autism spectrum
disorders."
Study 34: "Reduced levels of mercury in first baby haircuts of autistic children."
Study 35: "Doseresponse analysis indicating timedependent neurotoxicity caused by organic
and inorganic mercuryImplications for toxic effects in the developing brain."
Study 36: “Aluminum in Childhood Vaccines Is Unsafe”
Study 37: “CDC Thimerosal VSD Study Phase I”
Study 38: "Impact of environmental factors on the prevalence of autistic disorder after 1979"
Study 39: “Aluminuminduced entropy in biological systems: implications for neurological
disease.”
Study 40: “Adverse events following immunization with vaccines containing adjuvants.”

Study 41: "Adverse events following vaccination in premature infants."
Study 42: “Aluminum adjuvant linked to Gulf War illness induces motor neuron death in mice.”
Study 43: "Influenza vaccines: time for a rethink."
Study 44: "Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children."
Study 45: “Suspected side effects to the quadrivalent human papilloma vaccine.”
Study 46: "Acute infections as a means of cancer prevention: opposing effects to chronic
infections?"
Study 47: “Children Who Have Received No Vaccines: Who Are They and Where Do They
Live?”
Study 48: “Vaccination practices among physicians and their children”
Study 49: “Medical Journals Are an Extension of the Marketing Arm of Pharmaceutical
Companies”
Study 50: "The unofficial vaccine educators: are CDC funded nonprofits sufficiently
independent?"
Bonus Study 1: “Why the Corruption of the World Health Organization (WHO) is the Biggest
Threat to the World’s Public Health of Our Time”
Bonus Study 2: “Aluminium in brain tissue in autism”

How to Use This Guide
Provaxxers who don't want their paradigms shattered by my arguments often respond
defensively with "Where's the proof?" So I decided to do a series of 50 vaccinecritical research
studies, straight from peerreviewed journals and summarized by yours truly, to let the science
speak for itself. I picked 50 of the best studies I could find, ones that taken together give
someone a good understanding of the issues surrounding vaccines, and I posted these on
social media, basically 1 per day.

Now I’m here to share my battletested knowledge with you. I’m here to do three things: 1) improve
your understanding of the research behind vaccination, 2) convince you that you don’t need
fancy letters (PhD or MD) behind your name in order to read and interpret a research study, and
3) help you better take the fight to provaxxers by giving you a toolbox of studies that you can
drop like pokemon fighters.

I recommend you read a study a day until you finish all 50. For far too long, the masters of
knowledge have guarded their research secrets behind ivory towers and expensive medical

schools. But that’s all changed with the Internet. The big thing you learn by going through the
studies is that a lot of studies are completely readable; they are completely accessible to
laypeople like you and I. You can read the abstracts and conclusion, and dig into the
methodology if you wish.

This helps improve your understanding and confidence, such that when you are talking to
provaxxer or even to your doctor, you can stand your ground knowing that you are versed and
have read the actual research (which could be more than the doctor you are speaking with).
Besides dropping the right study at the right time feels very satisfying, like dropping checkmate
on the chessboard.

The argument for vaccine choice boils down to this: if there is a risk then there should be a free
choice. The provaccine folks like to ask for proof and demand a smoking gun. It’s debate bait.
You don’t have to prove to them that something is foolproof. All you need to do is that there is
reasonable evidence for an alternative course based on risk assessment. Your duty is to
yourself and to your family, not to some abstract herd immunity or theoretical risk to some given
immunocompromised child. Reasonableness is sufficient proof.

Feel free to copy this guide, modify it for your purposes, etc. Feel free to tweak any of my
summaries (to make it sound like you) and drop into your favorite social media and show off with
your knowledge.

If you want more ammo for the debate see this more complete guide: http://goo.gl/r3KVrZ
Study 1: “T emporal Association of Certain Neuropsychiatric Disorders Following Vaccination
of Children and Adolescents: A Pilot Case–Control Study"
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00003/full#B9
This study from Yale finds a temporal correlation of onset of neurological disorders following recent
vaccination.
They reported the following results. They found nearly 2x onset of anorexia nervosa [hazard ratio
(HR) 1.80, 95% confidence interval 1.21–2.68] from receiving any vaccines within the last 3 months
compared to controls. Receiving flu vaccines during the past year was related to higher incidences of
anorexia, obsessivecompulsive disorder, and anxiety disorders. Risks were found also for hepatitis
A with OCD and AN, hepatitis B with AN, and meningitis with AN and chronic tic disorder.
You should note that the authors are somewhat conciliatory towards the vaccine authorities. They
meekly state that, despite their findings, this shouldn’t doesn’t change the CDC recommendations.
This may be good for these professors, but, for a parent making a risk assessment for my kids, I’m
going to think twice before willynilly giving them this or that vaccine. I’m going to think for myself if
indeed the vaccine is truly necessary. Seems like I owe this to my kids and it’s the least I can do for
them.

Study 2: “Relative trends in hospitalizations and mortality among infants by the number of
vaccine doses and age, based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22531966

Today's study tackles the question of how safe are multiple vaccines given at the same time? Often
you have pediatricians and nurses lining up the shots and giving one right after the other like some
gunslinger to this poor baby. But how safe is it really? Apparently it's not safe at all.
This study analyzed the adverse effects reports from VAERS. It found an almost perfectly linear
relationship between number of shots given and hospitalization rates. The hospitalization rate
increased linearly from 11.0% (107 of 969) for 2 doses to 23.5% (661 of 2817) for 8 doses. Death
rates increased 150% between groups receiving 14 vaccines vs. 58 vaccines (3.6% to 5.5% death
rates).
Authors concluded: "Our findings show a positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses
administered and the percentage of hospitalizations and deaths." Simple, plain, and effective.
This multiple shots thing is a widespread and common practice. According to this study it's like a
barbaric practice, like not washing your hands before doing surgery.

Study 3: “ Effects of diphtheriatetanuspertussis or tetanus vaccination on allergies and
allergyrelated respiratory symptoms among children and adolescents in the United States.”
Abstract: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10714532
Full study: http://vaccinesafetycommission.org/…/472000UCLAAsthma.pdf

Wouldn't it be nice for your child to live without the inconvenience of allergies? Well maybe you
should have reconsidered those vaccines.
Today's study looks at survey data collected on 13,944 children from the National Center for Health
Statistics. A statistical analysis revealed that the odds of having a history of asthma was twice as
great among vaccinated subjects than among unvaccinated subjects, the odds of having had any
allergyrelated respiratory symptom in the past 12 months was 63% greater among vaccinated
subjects than unvaccinated subjects.
The study concludes that half of the pain of allergies could be attributable directly to vaccines:
"Assuming that the estimated vaccination effect is unbiased, 50% of diagnosed asthma cases (2.93
million) in US children and adolescents would be prevented if the DTP or tetanus vaccination was
not administered. Similarly, 45% of sinusitis cases (4.94 million) and 54% of allergyrelated episodes
of nose and eye symptoms (10.54 million) in a 12month period would be prevented after
discontinuation of the vaccine... DTP or tetanus vaccination appears to increase the risk of allergies
and related respiratory symptoms in children and adolescents."

Study 4: “Sudden infant death following hexavalent vaccination: a neuropathologic study.”
Fully study: http://www.infovaccini.it/lib/exe/fetch.php…

Study 4 of 50 VaccineCritical Studies! This study tackles a scary subject Sudden Infant Death
Syndrome and vaccines. Suddenly your baby is fine and well, and the next moment the baby is
gone. It's every parent's nightmare scenario.
This 2013 Italian study did an histological (detailed brain anatomy study) examination of 13 SIDS
deaths that were temporally linked to administration of hexavalent vaccine (6in1 shot). The authors
conclude the deaths are likely not related to "significant brain abnormalities" but rather have a direct
link to the vaccines. They mention that adjuvants might cross into the brain and cause neuronal
alterations that can the parts of the brain responsible for vital functions such as breathing.
The author's succinct telling of their conclusions is worth a read: "We can however suppose a direct
role of vaccine components in triggering a lethal outcome in a vulnerable baby. We know in fact that
many infants are vaccinated but not everyone dies or has an adverse reaction following vaccination.
Hence clearly, there are both specific genetic and constitutional factors of susceptibility which could
define how one reacts to a vaccine.
In particular, we hypothesize that several compounds and immunopotentiation adjuvants of the
hexavalent vaccine might easily go beyond the BBB [bloodbrain barrier], that in the first months of
life is still immature and quite permeable [35], i nducing neuronal molecular alterations in DNA, RNA,
and proteins of brainstem centers regulating vital functions, with consequent fatal disorganization of
respiratory control in particularly predisposed infants . Notably, the neurotoxicity of the aluminium
adjuvant in vaccinerelevant exposures has been experimentally demonstrated , including its ability to
cross the BBB and induce inflammatory and neurodegenerative changes." [italics mine]
In summary, the toxins and the adjuvants can cross the infant’s immature blood brain barrier and
cause all sorts of chaos. This sounds like enough science for a parent to be concerned. Where there
is risk, there should be a choice.

Study 5: "Comparison of VAERS fetalloss reports during three consecutive influenza seasons"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888271/

Study 5 of 50 vaccine critical studies! Today we look at the effect of recommending and giving the flu
vaccine to pregnant women.
With all the concern of protecting a new fetus, surely we should be concerned somewhat about
giving flu vaccines to pregnant? Especially when the flu vaccine has mercury? But the doctors say it
is entirely safe! Let’s look at what the data says.

This 2013 study examined the VAERS reports for 3 consecutive flu seasons, 2008/2009, 20092010,
20102011. 20092010 was a particular bad flu season and the rates of vaccination were much
higher (in addition to another dose added) compared to the year before and the year after. By
comparing vaccination rates and fetal death rates for the high years compared to the low years, one
can gauge dangers related to the flu vaccine for pregnant women.
The author found the following result: "Although there was an approximate fourfold (43%/11.3%)
increase in the percentage of pregnant women vaccinated in 2009/2010 compared with 2008/2009,
there was a 43.5fold increase in fetalloss reports – from 4 in 2008/2009 to 174 in 2009/2010."
A fourfold increase in the fetal loss due to the flu vaccine? Sounds like an unacceptable risk to me.
Unfortunately the effect is probably even worse. The author concluded that because VAERS is
underreported that likely the dangers from the flu vaccine for pregnant women are even higher than
than the findings suggest.
Study 6: “Effectiveness of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in influenzarelated
hospitalization in children: a casecontrol study.”
Study 6 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. There’s so much pressure to get the flu vaccine nowadays.
The CDC even pressures children to get 12 flu shots a year, greatly adding to vaccine schedule. But
are there risk from the recommendation?
This 2012 study published in Allergy and Asthma Proceedings theorized, since flu is wellknown to
cause asthma to worsen, that maybe the flu vaccine can prevent hospitalizations. Ok sounds
plausible.
So they looked at flu cases in children at the Mayo Clinic. They looked at whether or not the child got
the flu vaccine and whether hospitalization occurred. Did the flu vaccine prevent hospitals? Nope.
On the contrary, the vaccinated kids were 3x more likely to end up in the hospital. Ouch.
Authors concluded: "TIV did not provide any protection against hospitalization in pediatric subjects,
especially children with asthma. On the contrary, we found a threefold increased risk of
hospitalization in subjects who did get the TIV vaccine."

Study 7: "Increased risk of noninfluenza respiratory virus infections associated with receipt
of inactivated influenza vaccine."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22423139
http://www.themacraefoundation.org/…/…/03/abstract_VII6.pdf

Today's study looks at a very interesting phenomena: could vaccines actually make us more
susceptible to diseases in general? Let’s look at evidence from the flu vaccine.

This 2012 study looked at children from 115 households. In a randomized controlled trial, some
children go the flu vaccine and some got a placebo. Then they looked at respiratory illnesses among
the groups.
Lo and behold, the flu vaccinated group seemed to have 4x the amount of risk from catching a
nonspecific respiratory virus infection [relative risk: 4.40; 95% CI:1.31, 14.8].
The study concludes: "Although they were protected against influenza, TIV recipients appeared to
face a higher risk of noninfluenza respiratory virus infections."
For those that believe your vaccine is a “magic armor”, this study presents evidence that the vaccine
may actually make you more vulnerable. Good luck with your vaccine!

Study 8: “Is infant immunization a risk factor for childhood asthma or allergy?”
Study 8 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies! The show must go on. We continue looking at health
outcomes between the vaccinated and unvaccinated.
This 1997 study from the journal Epidemiology studied 1,265 children born in 1977. 23 children from
this group were unvaccinated for both diphtheria/pertussis/tetanus and polio; the rest were
vaccinated.
For the immunized group, 23.1% had asthma episodes, 22.5% asthma consultations, and 30.0%
consultations for other allergic illness. For the unvaccinated group, no allergies or asthma was
observed. The same differences were observed at ages 5 and ages 16.
Another win for natural immunity!
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3702662…

Study 9: "DTP with or after measles vaccination is associated with increased inhospital
mortality in GuineaBissau."

Study 9 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies! Could the order in which different vaccines are given have a
significant effect on a child's health? Apparently so. If the order is wrong, consequences could be
disastrous.
This 2007 study published in the Vaccine journal looked at children hospitalized during two periods in
19901996 and 20012002 in GuineaBissau's only pediatric ward. The study looked at which
vaccine was given first, measles vaccine or diphtheriatetanuspolio (DTP) vaccine.
It seemed that when DTP was given after or concurrently with the measles vaccine the fatality rate
was about double [the ratio being 2.53 (1.374.67) and 1.77 (0.923.41) in the two periods].

The author's conclude: "Administration of DTP with, or after MV, may reduce the beneficial effect of
MV."
This study clearly shows that we don't know everything there is to know about vaccines nor the
immune system. These nonspecific effects are quite surprising and these unknowns can lead to
actual deaths.

Study 10: "Infection, vaccines and other environmental triggers of autoimmunity."

Study 10 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies! It's not often acknowledged by health authorities that we
have an increasing epidemic of autoimmune diseases that by far dwarfs the current rates of
vaccinepreventable diseases. Autoimmune diseases are far scarier than the former because they
are chronic conditions. Today's study looks at the relationship between vaccines and autoimmunity.
This 2005 literature review study looks at what we know about trigger factors for autoimmune
disease. It has been known for a while that infections can induce or exacerbate autoimmune
diseases through the mechanism of molecular mimicry. But what is not often acknowledged is that
vaccinations seem to temporally induce new autoimmune diseases likely through the same
mechanism.
The study states: "Vaccines, in several reports were found to be temporally followed by a new onset
of autoimmune diseases. The same mechanisms that act in infectious invasion of the host, apply
equally to the host response to vaccination. It has been accepted for diphtheria and tetanus toxoid,
polio and measles vaccines and GBS. Also this theory has been accepted for MMR vaccination and
development of autoimmune thrombocytopenia, MS has been associated with HBV vaccination."
The question is why are we accepting the tradeoff of one temporary disease for a chronic one?
Shouldn't we have a choice in accepting this risk?

Study 11 of 50: “SelfOrganized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity”

Today's study is a bombshell. There's a growing epidemic of autoimmune diseases which are far
scarier than the vaccinepreventable diseases because they are chronic. This study is devastating
for the mandatory vaccine program which has continued to increase the number of shots given to
children with dubious cause for doing so thereby putting our children’s health at risk.
In this 2009 study published in PLoS One, the researchers essentially took healthy mice and "gave
them" autoimmune diseases by repeatedly injecting them with antigens. The authors succinctly state
what they did: “In a perfectly reproducible experiments in which the mice not prone to autoimmune
diseases were immunized repeatedly with antigen, we have unexpectedly and surprisingly

discovered that overstimulation of immune system beyond its selforganized criticality inevitably
leads to systemic autoimmunity.”
The authors conclude: “Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of
overstimulating the host's immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that
surpass system's selforganized criticality.”
There you have it folks. More shots can be equated to more autoimmune diseases. When will the
madness stop?

Study 12: “Transverse myelitis and vaccines: a multianalysis.”

Study 12 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies! Provaccine people often cry "Vaccines got rid of polio!" but
what they don't know is that we some thousands of paralysis cases from transverse myelitis each
year. Same symptoms, different name.
This 2009 study from the journal Lupus does a multianalysis of transverse myelitis and vaccines by
analyzing the literature for the past few decades regarding transverse myelitis and vaccines. They
found definitive links between transverse myelitis and vaccines.
They report: "We have disclosed 37 reported cases of transverse myelitis associated with different
vaccines including those against hepatitis B virus, measlesmumpsrubella,
diphtheriatetanuspertussis and others, given to infants, children and adults. In most of these
reported cases the temporal association was between several days and 3 months, although a longer
time frame of up to several years was also suggested."
Again the thing to blame is our old friend the adjuvant (aluminum in most cases). The authors state:
"The associations of different vaccines with a single autoimmune phenomenon allude to the idea that
a common denominator of these vaccines, such as an adjuvant, might trigger this syndrome."
There you have it. In some rare cases, vaccines can lead to the very same condition that poliovirus
can lead to.
Poor you if you that were person unlucky enough to come down with transverse myelitis. I guess
someone had to be sacrificed to the idea of "herd immunity". Sorry it was you.

Study 13: “ Simian virus 40 and human cancer.”

Study 13 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies! Today we look at one of the largest Fups in vaccine history
if not in the entirety of science. A retrovirus is a kind of virus that can insert its own DNA into its host

DNA. Yup scary stuff. Most especially if you think about what would happen if it got into the populace
at large.
In this 1998 study published in the Monaldi Archives of Chest Disease, the study talks about a
retrovirus Simian virus 40 (SV40) that was inadvertently spread to recipients of contaminated polio
vaccine from the periods of 19571965. If you do your math, this would would translate to millions of
people.
Moreover SV40 has been shown to cause in animal models. The study states: "Simian virus 40
(SV40) has been shown to induce brain tumors, osteosarcoma, lymphoid tumors and malignant
mesothelioma in hamsters and SV40like DNA sequences corresponding to the Rbpocket binding
domain of SV40 Tantigen (Tag) have been detected in the same human tumors."
The study talks a biological mechanism for SV40 can lead to cancer. It concludes with: "Up to now
the source of SV40 human infections has not yet been completely identified even though
administration from 19571965 of SV40 contaminated polio vaccines is highly suspected."
It's not often acknowledged what Frankenstein type scenarios can occur with vaccines. This is one
of them. Potentially SV40 in humans leads to increased cancer rates. And they infected millions in
the human population with it…
Is this a problem for the vaccine authorities? No! Let their cancer be treated by conventional
medicine! These are "acceptable casualties" on the war against disease! Let’s not forget also that
poliovirus causes no symptoms in 9899% of people. Science gone mad.

Study 14: “Immunization Safety Review: SV40 Contamination of Polio Vaccine and
Cancer.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=25057632
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK221113/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK221113.pdf

Study 14 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies! Yesterday I talked about the SV40 disaster and about how
millions of Americans had integrated simian virus DNA into their own genes with evidence that it led
to increased cancer rates. If you were the vaccine authorities, do you come clean with your mistake
and do everything you can to assess the true risk? Or do you try to cover it up with your own series
of flawed studies?
This 2002 study is a study by the Institute of Medicine, one of the respectable boards in medicine
today examined the issue of SV40. At those point, a number of epidemiological studies had come
that had stated that there was no connection between SV40 and cancer. The IOM took apart these
studies and pointed out their numerous flaws and affirmed the link between the botched polio
vaccine campaign and the spread of SV40 within the human population.
The study concluded: "However, because these epidemiologic studies are sufficiently flawed, the
Institute of Medicine's Immunization Safety Review Committee concluded that the evidence was
inadequate to conclude whether or not the contaminated polio vaccine caused cancer. In light of the

biological evidence supporting the theory that SV40contamination of polio vaccines could contribute
to human cancers, the committee recommends continued public health attention in the form of policy
analysis, communication, and targeted biological research."
Looks like CDC denials of harm were nullified by the IOM. There could actually be a risk and more
study is required.
It doesn't take a genius to see the hubris and dangers of scientists playing god. The casualties are
real and the deaths are real.

Study 15: “New developments about the association of SV40 with human mesothelioma.”
Study 15 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. One more SV40 study to round it all out before moving onto
other topics. Recall that a botched polio vaccine campaign led to millions of people affected with a
monkey virus, Simian Virus 40
The following is a 2003 review of the SV40 literature and it basically affirms the cancer risk
associated with SV40. The presence of SV40 in tumors has been confirmed in over 40 different
laboratories. The Institute of Medicine, the 2001 International consensus meeting on SV40 and
human tumors held at the University of Chicago, and a workshop organized by the Biological
Carcinogenesis Branch all independently reached the conclusion that "there is compelling evidence
that SV40 is present in some human cancers and that SV40 could contribute to the pathogenesis of
some of them."
Essentially what happened with the great human experiment on the polio vaccine has led to vaccine
scientists rewriting the history to talk about their "successes" and sweeping the many hurt by the
experiment under the rug.
History repeats itself. This same pattern is still going on and the same playbook is being used for
autism. People need to wake up.

Study 16: “E ndogenous retroviruses as potential hazards for vaccines”
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/43079708_Endogenous_retroviruses_as_potential_hazard
s_for_vaccines

Study 16 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. Previously we looked at the ability of retroviruses such as
SV40 to incorporate themselves into the human genome. But what risks exist for new kinds of
retroviruses to introduce themselves into the human population?

This 2010 study from the journal Biologicals looks at just that. While genetic animal engineering
allows us to develop tissue and materials for humans, there is the risk that endogenous retrovirus
DNA that the host animal has incorporated could be passed onto humans. This study looks at

transmission of the RD114 virus, an endogenous retrovirus, that can be passed onto humans from
vaccines.

Essentially the paper says we have known that endogenous retroviruses can contaminate vaccines
via the vaccine manufacturing processes we have now and caution is warranted. The authors
conclude: "As long as feline cells are used to produce vaccines, there is a risk that infectious RD114
virus contaminates live attenuated vaccines. Because RD114 virus productively infects cells from
cats and dogs, the virus can infect these animals in vivo. Since certain ERVs infect new host species
and induce diseases, the potential risks of infection by ERVs in humans and animals should be
reconsidered."

This is just one such retrovirus. You have wonder is the full plethora of risks we are exposing our
children and the greater human population by incorporating foreign DNA into our genome.

Study 17: “Vaccines, adjuvants and autoimmunity.”

Study 17 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. In this study we go back to the topic of a connection
between vaccines and autoimmunity. We have to keep in mind that the many of the diseases we are
vaccinating against have such a low incidence rate that the risk of autoimmune disease incident may
exceed that of the original disease.

This 2015 literature review of the vaccines and autoimmunity from the journal Pharmacological
Research reflects this very thought above: "Since vaccines are given to previously healthy hosts,
who may have never developed the disease had they not been immunized, adverse events should
be carefully accessed and evaluated even if they represent a limited number of occurrences."

The review of the literature is clear on the connection between vaccines and autoimmune diseases.
The authors clearly state: "There is evidence of vaccineinduced autoimmunity and adjuvantinduced
autoimmunity in both experimental models as well as human patients."

In the conclusion the authors affirm that while previous epidemiological studies failed to find a link
between vaccines and autoimmunity due to difficulties in studying the topic, they state: "efforts to
unveil the connection between the triggering of the immune system by adjuvants and the
development of autoimmune conditions should be undertaken."

The science has spoken. Vaccines and autoimmune diseases are linked.

Study 18: “New QualityControl Investigations on Vaccines: Micro and Nanocontamination”
http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV0400072.php?fref=gc&dti=1083727945032973

Study 18 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. Do you know what its in your vaccines? I'd say 99% of
people don't. Well we are going to find out in today's study which is one of the most devastating I
have found.

According to a 2016 study published in the International Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination, in recent
times the seriousness of side effects from vaccines has gone up. Moreover no adequate model
exists for explaining why these occur: "No satisfactory explanation or, in many cases, no explanation
at all has been given and it seems that those adverse effects happen on a random and stochastic
basis."

This study takes a new direction on the issue by a physical examination of the vaccines themselves.
The study examined 44 different vaccines. The findings were disturbing in that each of the 44
vaccines had their profiles of physical contaminants. There were lead, stainless steel, and tungsten
in most of the vaccines.

They also found: "Other particles containing Zirconium, Hafnium, Strontium and Aluminum (Vivotif,
Meningetec); Tungsten, Nickel, Iron (Priorix, Meningetec); Antimony (Menjugate kit); Chromium
(Meningetec); Gold or Gold, Zinc (Infarix Hexa, Repevax), or Platinum, Silver, Bismuth, Iron,
Chromium (MMRvaxPro) or Lead,Bismuth (Gardasil) or Cerium (Agrippal S1) were also found. The
only Tungsten appears in 8/44 vaccines, while Chromium (alone or in alloy with Iron and Nickel) in
25/44. The investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological substrate,
probably proteins, endotoxins and residues of bacteria." The varicella, HPV, and flu vaccines were
among the most contaminated of the vaccines.

The entire discussion is worth a read in its entirety. These materials can cause immediate or delayed
side effects and induce an inflammatory response. The paper is very clear on the dangers: "It is a
wellknown fact in toxicology that contaminants exert a mutual, synergic effect, and as the number of
contaminants increases, the effects grow less and less predictable. The more so when some
substances are unknown."

Furthermore the paper states a biological hypothesis for the differences in side effects observed: "In
the former case, the pollutants contained in the drug have reached the brain and, depending on the
anatomical site interested, have induced a reaction. If that is the case, the whole phenomenon is
very rapid. In the latter circumstance, the pollutants reached the microbiota, thus interfering with the
production of enzymes necessary to carry out neurological functions "

The paper concludes with a call for reform: "If our hypothesis is actually the case, a close inspection
of the working places and the full knowledge of the whole procedure of vaccine preparation would
probably allow to eliminate the problem. A further purification of the vaccines could improve their
quality and could probably decrease the number and seriousness of the adverse incidental effects."

Until this happens a lack of choice is immoral. Where there is risk there must be a choice. The
dangers are quite clear.

Study 19: “Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS
19972002.”
Study 19 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies! Now we get to the infamous Aword "autism" and its
connection to vaccines. In addition we will tackle the asinine practice of vaccinating all newborns for
Hepatitis B which is known as a sexuallytransmitted disease.

This 2010 study come from the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health in which a statistical
analysis of from the National Health Interview Survey 19972002 was done. The authors looked for
an association for neonatal hepatitis B vaccination and autism.

The study reported: "Boys vaccinated as neonates had threefold greater odds for autism diagnosis
compared to boys never vaccinated or vaccinated after the first month of life. NonHispanic white
boys were 64% less likely to have autism diagnosis relative to nonwhite boys... Nonwhite boys bore
the greater risk."

This should make you mad at the medical establishment. Hepatitis B is only a risk for certain
demographics but it's blanketly applied to all babies and lives are destroyed as a process. Moreover
hepatitis B being spread primarily as a STD bears little contribution to the traditional idea of herd
immunity. Harm without benefit.

Study 20: “Polio programme: let us declare victory and move on.”

Full study:
http://jeffreydachmd.com/wpcontent/uploads/2014/03/PoliodeclarevictoryVashishtIndianJMedE
thics2012.pdf

Study 20 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. In 2012, victory against polio was celebrated in India owing
to a massive oral polio vaccination campaign funded by the Bill Gates Foundation. Was it a victory?

"Not so!" declare the authors of this 2012 study from the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics. It seems
that the polio vaccination led to the rapid rise of cases of acute flaccid paralysis. Same symptoms,
different name but twice as deadly.

The authors state the damning evidence: "While India has been poliofree for a year, there has been
a huge increase in nonpolio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). In 2011, there were an extra 47500
new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the
incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received. Though this data was
collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigated."

The authors sarcastically warn us to be wary of Western institutions seeking to "help" with their
vaccines: "The principle of primumnonnocere [do no harm] was violated. The authors suggest that
the huge bill of US$ 8 billion spent on the programme, is a small sum to pay if the world learns to be
wary of such vertical programmes in the future."

Nice one Bill Gates and provaccine scientists. You celebrate your victory. Not.

Study 21: “Detection and characterization of pestivirus contaminations in human live viral
vaccines.”

Study 21 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies! Today we continue with the question of: what's in the
vaccines? Apparently foreign RNA that shouldn't be there. How about cow viruses that are injected
into babies?

This 2002 study from the journal Biologicals found evidence of pestivirus RNA in 33% of the vaccine
lots they tested. Pestivirus are kinds of viruses that infect bovines and other herd animals.

The study states: "Between 3.3*10(2) and 6.2*10(5) RNA copies per dose were found to be present
in the vaccine samples." The foreign material seems to be a cause of the vaccine manufacturing
process.

Despite these findings, the study concludes: "Our results indicate that contamination with BVDV of
FCS used in vaccine production does not appear to be of immediate concern to human health."

So basically they are saying "We don't see any serious dangers from injecting babies with cow
viruses so let’s just pretend it's not there."

Study 22: “Serologic response to porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV1) in infants vaccinated with
the human rotavirus vaccine, Rotarix™: A retrospective laboratory analysis.”

Study 22 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. Today we continue to ask the question "What's in the
vaccines that shouldn't be there?" Today it's pig viruses present in the rotavirus vaccine.
This 2017 study from the journal Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics reports that in 2010
porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV1) was discovered in the rotavirus vaccine. This studied corroborated
that indeed that immune system of the infants did indeed mount an immune system response
against the pig virus.
They reported: "Samples from 596 infants who participated in clinical trials of the human RV vaccine
were randomly selected and analyzed. The observed antiPCV1 antibody seropositivity rate 12
months postdose 2 was approximately 1% in infants who received the human RV vaccine and 0.3%
in those who received placebo."
But the real interesting part I want to share is the following in the conclusion: "No serious adverse
events had been reported in any of the 4 subjects providing antiPCV1 positive samples during the
31day postvaccination followup period in the original studies. In conclusion, the presence of PCV1
in the human RV vaccine is considered to be a manufacturing quality issue and does not appear to
pose a safety risk to vaccinated infants."
Wait, wait, wait so just because no "serious" side effects were reported in a month that it makes it
okay for pig viruses that shouldn't be there to be given to infants? What about the nonserious side
effects? What about informed consent and disclosure? What about potential longterm effects?
Let’s pretend this never happened and go about business as usual and that, ladies and gentlemen,
is precisely what is wrong with our mandatory vaccine program. No problems raised, no questions
asked.

Study 23: “Persistence of Measles Antibodies After 2 Doses of Measles Vaccine in a
Postelimination Environment”
Full text: http://zdoroviy.com.ua/content/docs/11.7.12.pdf

Study 23 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies! We often hear the clarion call repeated "Herd immunity! We
must protect against the herd! Do your duty!" But no one acknowledges the temporary nature of
vaccine herd immunity compared to natural herd immunity.The poster child for herd immunity is
measles, but it seems after one dose seemed insufficient to eradicate measles, a second dose was
added to the schedule.

This 2007 study from Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med looked at children who received the measles
vaccine (46 years old) and then followed up with them for 10 years looking at the level of their
measles antibodies in the blood.

The results showed diminishing antibody levels over time suggesting decreased protective effects
from the vaccine: "One month after the second dose, 0.2% had low titers... By study end, 4.9% had
low titers... Projections suggest that the proportion of persons with low antibody levels may increase
over time... Declining titers suggest the need for vigilance in ensuring disease protection for the
vaccinated population."

So basically by the end of 10 years it seems the alleged 95% rate needed to maintain herd immunity
would be on the borderline for failing. By 20 years past, the projections would indicate (see attached)
vaccine failure in a significant amount of the original population. What's more a small percentage of
the population (0.2% in the study sample) seem unable to hit antibody levels where they would be
deemed protected.

The irony is, with increasing vaccine failure over time, that vaccine herd immunity creates a more
vulnerable population to the disease in question compared to natural immunity.

Study 24: "'ASIA' autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants."

Study 24 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. So much research on the vaccine and autoimmunity
connection. We continue on with the exploration.

This 2011 study from the journal Autoimmunity recognizes and defines autoimmune conditions
caused adjuvants from vaccines under the term ASIA, "Autoimmune (Autoinflammatory) Syndrome
Induced by Adjuvant."

The study reported on its findings: "In recent years, four conditions: siliconosis, the Gulf war
syndrome (GWS), the macrophagic myofasciitis syndrome (MMF) and postvaccination phenomena
were linked with previous exposure to an adjuvant. Furthermore, these four diseases share a similar
complex of signs and symptoms which further support a common denominator."

I know I'm beating a dead horse. But it can be said and said again: vaccines can cause autoimmune
disease.

Study 25: “Lessons learnt in Japan from adverse reactions to the HPV vaccine: a medical
ethics perspective”
http://ijme.in/articles/lessonslearntinjapanfromadversereactionstothehpvvaccineamedic
alethicsperspective/

Study 25 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies! Americans are largely unaware that pharmaceuticals
are pushing and lobbying for vaccines worldwide. Recently serious adverse conditions were
observed in the HPV vaccine in Japan such the government of Japan removed the HPV vaccine
from their schedule. American media has quietly swept this under the rug so as to avoid people
asking questions about the government's domestic push for HPV vaccinations.

This 2017 June study from the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics devastating looks at what went
wrong with the push for the HPV vaccine. They state: "The argument for the safety and
effectiveness of the HPV vaccine overlooks the following flaws: (i) no consideration is given to
the genetic basis of autoimmune diseases, and arguments that do not take this into account
cannot assure the safety of the vaccine; (ii) the immune evasion mechanisms of HPV, which
require the HPV vaccine to maintain an extraordinarily high antibody level for a long period of
time for it to be effective, are disregarded; and (iii) the limitations of effectiveness of the vaccine.
"

But the greater problem has been and continues to be government corruption where commercial
interests affect policymaking. The study continues: "The responsibility to prove the efficacy and
safety of a vaccine lies with the pharmaceutical companies, and the government is expected to
monitor and guide these efforts. The current situation in which commercial interests drive
government policy must be corrected from a medical ethics perspective."

The implications of what happened in Japan cannot be overstated: "The Japanese
government’s decision to stop actively recommending HPV vaccination has, to an extent,
encouraged regulators and patients in other countries to question the value of HPV vaccination."

If the Japanese government can take an unbiased look at what is occurring and puts a stop to it,
why can't the American people?

Study 26: "A twophase study evaluating the relationship between Thimerosalcontaining
vaccine administration and the risk for an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis in the United
States”

Study 26 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. Now onto the hottest topic in vaccines: do vaccines cause
autism?

This 2013 from the journal Translational Neurodegeneration examines the issue in two ways: 1)
comparing autism rates from a DiphtheriaTetanusacellularPertussis (DTaP) vaccines given with

thimerosal vs. without, and 2) evaluation of infants receiving Thimerosalcontaining hepatitis B
vaccines and autism rates. Data came from the VAERS and VSD databases.

And study reports the following results: "In phase I, it was observed that there was a significantly
increased risk ratio for the incidence of ASD reported following the Thimerosalcontaining DTaP
vaccine in comparison to the Thimerosalfree DTaP vaccine. In phase II, it was observed that cases
diagnosed with an ASD were significantly more likely than controls to receive increased organicHg
from Thimerosalcontaining hepatitis B vaccine administered within the first, second, and sixth month
of life."

The study concludes: "The present study provides new epidemiological evidence supporting an
association between increasing organicHg exposure from Thimerosalcontaining childhood vaccines
and the subsequent risk of an ASD diagnosis."

Study 27: "A positive association found between autism prevalence and childhood
vaccination uptake across the U.S. population."

We continue to hammer on the vaccineautism connection.

This 2011 study from the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health posits that because the
cause of the widespread rise of autism rates is a mystery that it would be logical to examine changes
in the the environment that coincide with the rising rates. Lo and behold vaccines!

Controlling for family income and ethnicity, they study did a statistical analysis between vaccination
and rates of autism (AUT) or speech or language impairment (SLI) in each U.S. state from 2001 and
2007.

The conclusions are clear. More vaccines equals more autism. The authors results show: "The
higher the proportion of children receiving recommended vaccinations, the higher was the
prevalence of AUT or SLI. A 1% increase in vaccination was associated with an additional 680
children having AUT or SLI."

Now at this point mercury should have been removed from the vaccines so something else in the
vaccines can lead to autism. Adjuvant anyone? How about some aluminum for your brain?

Study 28: “Methodological Issues and Evidence of Malfeasance in Research Purporting to
Show Thimerosal in Vaccines Is Safe”

Study 28 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies! You might protest that the CDC debunked the
vaccineautism connection.But it seems there are a few glaring errors in those studies that perhaps
the CDC should not have made.

This 2014 study from Biomed Research International does a grilling review of the problems inherent
in the CDC. They seek to explain the conflicting research: 75 years of study has shown thimerosal
mercury in vaccines to be harmful but the CDC's 6 epidemiological studies do not.

The study concludes: "Considering that there are many studies conducted by independent
researchers which show a relationship between Thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders, the
results of the six studies examined in this review, particularly those showing the protective effects of
Thimerosal, should bring into question the validity of the methodology used in the studies."

If you want to see the problems with the test methodology, I've attached it here.

The sad part is these flawed tests are used to marginalize the children and parents whose lives were
damaged by vaccines.

Study 29: "What is regressive autism and why does it occur? Is it the consequence of
multisystemic dysfunction affecting the elimination of heavy metals and the ability to regulate
neural temperature?"

Study 29 of 50 VaccineCritical Studies. What is amazing about the autismvaccine denial is the
amount of dumbeddown science there is about it that is told to the public. It's not often
acknowledged the regressive autism can also be seen as an autoimmune condition and those links
are fairly established.

This 2009 study from the North American Journal of Medical Sciences does an outstanding job of
summarizing the literature regarding vaccine and autism, and explaining how a biological basis for
vaccines and autoimmune conditions/autism could exist.

This biological basis is stated clearly: "The introduction of many vaccines (up to 30 in a typical
vaccination schedule) introduces a large number of foreign proteins which may be sufficient to
ensure that immune function never returns to baseline and/or that immune biochemistry is
fundamentally altered"

The study reiterates that unvaccinated children are healthier: "Unvaccinated children appear to have
less exposure to disease, delaying vaccination reduces exposure to disease, contracting the disease
naturally leads to less disease in future, and that excessive vaccination is considered ineffective and
dangerous."

The study concludes with an interesting thought about our social structure for supporting increasing
amounts of autistic children: "The cost of treating vaccinerelated sideeffects may now be far greater
than the diseases against which the vaccine(s) were designed to protect... Furthermore, in the
developed world there is a highly developed social structure which is able to assist parents to deal
with the condition [measles]. By comparison, what are the implications for an autistic child in the
developing world where there is absence of resources to deal with the condition?"

Study 30: "Increased Susceptibility to EthylmercuryInduced Mitochondrial Dysfunction in a
Subset of Autism Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines"

Study 30 of 50 VaccineCritical Studies. A long time ago vaccine scientists made a mistake. In their
drive to eliminate disease in the name of science, they made made an assumption that all humans
were the same. But what if this weren't the case? Could this be the explanation for both regressive
autism and SIDS?

This 2015 study from the Journal of Toxicology did a case examination of mitochondrial respiration in
lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) from individuals with autism and unaffected controls exposed to
ethylmercury. They exposed certain cells in those individuals to ethylmercury and examined the
results.

The results indicate that a portion of the population may be genetically sensitive to mercury in
vaccines (thimerosal) which damages mitochrondria in those individuals: "Examination of 16
autism/control LCL pairs revealed that a subgroup (31%) of autism LCLs exhibited a greater
reduction in ATPlinked respiration, maximal respiratory capacity, and reserve capacity when
exposed to ethylmercury, compared to control LCLs."

The paper concludes: "We have determined that a subgroup of AD LCLs exhibits abnormal
mitochondrial respiratory function at baseline and increased vulnerability to mitochondrial
dysfunction when exposed to the environmental toxin, ethylmercury."

Genetic sensitivities exist and aren't acknowledged by those who push vaccines. Are as a society
complicit in the harm caused to those individuals who were damaged?

Study 31: "Nonlinear doseresponse of aluminium hydroxide adjuvant particles: Selective
low dose neurotoxicity."
Full paper:
http://vaccinepapers.org/wpcontent/uploads/Nonlineardoseresponseofaluminiumhydroxideadju
vantparticlesSelectivelowdoseneurotoxicity.pdf

Study 31 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. I keep saying it over and over again. Injecting aluminum in
your babies is a bad idea.

This 2017 study from the journal Toxicology does a toxicological examination of Aluminium (Al)
hydroxide (Alhydrogel), the main adjuvant licensed for human and animal vaccines. The studied
neuroeffects in mice after being exposed to the varying levels of the adjuvant.

Results were puzzling. It seemed that a larger dose didn't correspond to the most toxic profiles. The
most toxic profiles occurred at the lower doses: "Neurobehavioural changes, including decreased
activity levels and altered anxietylike behaviour, were observed compared to controls in animals
exposed to 200μg Al/kg but not at 400 and 800μg Al/kg. Consistently, microglial number appeared
increased in the ventral forebrain of the 200μg Al/kg group. Cerebral Al levels were selectively
increased in animals exposed to the lowest dose, while muscle granulomas had almost completely
disappeared at 6 months in these animals."

The paper concludes with how these results are challenging to our current notions of toxicology: "We
conclude that Alhydrogel® injected at low dose in mouse muscle may selectively induce longterm Al

cerebral accumulation and neurotoxic effects... the view that Alhydrogel® neurotoxicity obeys 'the
dose makes the poison' rule of classical chemical toxicity appears overly simplistic."

It's quite clear aluminum is bad for you and it's clear the safety assessments are flawed. The authors
finally note: "In the context of massive development of vaccinebased strategies worldwide, the
present study may suggest that aluminium adjuvant toxicokinetics and safety require reevaluation."

Study 32: "Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism?"

Study 32 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. Could aluminum adjuvants be the cause of autism?

This 2011 study from the Journal of Inorganic Chemistry sought to statistical analyzed the data if
there is a causal relationship between aluminum and autism.

The results say damning:
"(i) children from countries with the highest ASD prevalence appear to have the highest exposure to
Al from vaccines;

(ii) the increase in exposure to Al adjuvants significantly correlates with the increase in ASD
prevalence in the United States observed over the last two decades (Pearson r=0.92, p<0.0001);
and

(iii) a significant correlation exists between the amounts of Al administered to preschool children and
the current prevalence of ASD in seven Western countries, particularly at 34 months of age
(Pearson r=0.890.94, p=0.00180.0248)."

The study brings up a very valid question that shows the hypocrisy in the medical community: "If
exposure to Al from only few vaccines can lead to cognitive impairment and autoimmunity in adults,
is it unreasonable to question whether the current pediatric schedules, often containing 18 Al
adjuvanted vaccines, are safe for children?"

Study 33: "Hypothesis: conjugate vaccines may predispose children to autism spectrum
disorders."

Study 33 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies! "Say yes to vaccine innovation!" New vaccine technologies
are introduced all the time without the corresponding safety studies in the great American

vaccination experiment. Today we look at the introduction of conjugate vaccine in 1988. A conjugate
vaccine is when you pair a weaker antigen with a stronger antigen in order to elicit an immune
response. It's used in the Hib, the meningitis, and pneumonia vaccine.

This 2011 study from the journal Medical Hypothesis acknowledges the rise of autismspectrum
disorders (ASD) and looks for triggers in the environment. This study proposes that perhaps the
introduction of conjugate vaccines could be the cause for rise in ASDs.

While I've already covered other studies that point to the big baddies such as aluminum and mercury
in vaccines, this study proposes a biological mechanism for how conjugate vaccines can affect infant
immune systems in novel ways: "This period of hyporesponsiveness to carbohydrate antigens [from
the vaccines] coincides with the intense myelination process in infants and young children, and
conjugate vaccines may have disrupted evolutionary forces that favored early brain development
over the need to protect infants and young children from capsular bacteria.

Simply put, there are things we don't know about the immune system we don't know yet. Especially
we don't know how infants will respond to vaccine innovation that evolutionary the human race hasn't
ever seen before.

Study 34: "Reduced levels of mercury in first baby haircuts of autistic children."

Study 34 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. The vaccine experts say: "Mercury in vaccines is safe
because your body will excrete it after a week!" But could possibly different children have different
abilities to excrete the mercury toxin?

This 2003 study from the International Journal of Toxicology looked at mercury hair levels in autistic
infants vs. a control. They found the following results: "Hair mercury levels in the autistic group were
0.47 ppm versus 3.63 ppm in controls, a significant difference. The mothers in the autistic group had
significantly higher levels of mercury exposure through Rho D immunoglobulin injections and
amalgam fillings than control mothers."

An examination of the control group implicates vaccine mercury exposure: "Hair mercury levels
among controls were significantly correlated with the number of the mothers' amalgam fillings and
their fish consumption as well as exposure to mercury through childhood vaccines, correlations that
were absent in the autistic group"

The study concludes: "Hair excretion patterns among autistic infants were significantly reduced
relative to control. These data cast doubt on the efficacy of traditional hair analysis as a measure of
total mercury exposure in a subset of the population."

The vaccine authorities dirty secret is that they assume all infants have the same ability to deal with
mercury toxin but this isn't the case. Unfortunately those infants are damaged by our current vaccine
policies.

Study 35: "Doseresponse analysis indicating timedependent neurotoxicity caused by
organic and inorganic mercuryImplications for toxic effects in the developing brain."
Study 35 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. Oftentimes you hear from parents "I vaccinated my child and
nothing happened." But what if adverse events are minor enough not to be observed and are
permanent?

This 2016 study from the journal of Toxicology examines the effects of exposure to mercury from
vaccines to determine if there are timedependent effects from the exposure by seeing if the data fits
a timedependent model, DruckreyKüpfmüller equation.

Effects are indeed timedependent: "The results indicate that the DruckreyKüpfmüller equation
describes well the doseresponse characteristics of organic mercury induced neurotoxic effects. This
amounts to a paradigm shift in chemical risk assessment of mercurial compounds and highlights that
it is vital to perform toxicity testing geared to investigate timedependent effects."

Just because no immediate adverse events are seen doesn't mean that some minor adverse change
(for example affecting brain development) hasn't occurred.

Study 36: “Aluminum in Childhood Vaccines Is Unsafe”
http://homeoint.ru/pdfs/haley.pdf

Study 36 of 50 VaccineCritical Studies. We bravely continue onward with the vaccineautism link.
Apparently mercury can kill brain cells, but mercury + aluminum kills brain cells far better than either
alone! Where do you get a combination of mercury and aluminum? Vaccines.

Today's study is a 2005 study from the journal Medical Veritas that does a review of the biological
effects of mercury from various sources including vaccines. The study reiterates the harmful effects
of mercury but also establishes a synergistic relationship for harm with other metals. In particular,
aluminum in combination with mercury causes the greatest amount of neuron death (see graph
below).

The study concludes: "it appears as if autistics represent a subset of the population that are more
susceptible to the toxic effects of mercury and thimerosal because they are not efficient excretors of
these toxic materials.... Finally, the synergistic effects of other heavy metals, diet,
antibiotics, etc. on mercury toxicity make it impossible to define a 'safe level of mercury exposure.'
Therefore it is imperative that we try to eliminate all exposure to mercury"

Study 37: “ CDC Thimerosal VSD Study Phase I”
https://www.scribd.com/document/18028414/CONFIDENTIALThimerosalVSDStudyPhaseI

Study 37 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. What if we could peer behind the scenes at the CDC's own
confidential internal assessment of mercury in vaccines? Wouldn't this the most truthful assessment
from the CDC instead of normal public relations material?

Today's study is the original Phase 1 assessment done by the CDC regarding mercury in vaccines. It
was a confidential internal assessment that was obtained via the FOIA. In this study, a statistical
analysis of the Vaccine Safety Datalink data was done, looking at children at 1 month and 3 months.

The authors report increasing risks of neurological development disorders with increasing exposure
to thimerosal. There were statistically significant increases found for misery and unhappiness
disorder and attention deficit disorder for 1 month olds, and general neurological development
disorders, including autism, stuttering, and ADD, for 3 month olds

There you have it. The CDC's own internal assessment showed the damaging effects of mercury in
vaccines. It seems like a whole group of government scientists effed up.

What to do? Clean up data to hide the statistical evidence, quietly remove thimerosal from childhood
vaccines, tell the world it was a "precautionary measure", and publish a whole bunch of biased
epidemiological studies to coveryourass.

Study 38: "Impact of environmental factors on the prevalence of autistic disorder after
1979"
http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/JPHE/articleabstract/C98151247042

Study 38 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. Medical authorities have been looking for a cause of autism
for 10+ year and they haven't gotten any closer. But they do repeat the very suspicious mantra "We
don't know the cause of autism but we know it's not the vaccines." Lets visit this statement today.
How about human fetal cells in the vaccines as a cause?

This 2014 study is from the Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology. It was a worldwide
population based cohort study that looked at the link between vaccines and autism in children
worldwide using public vaccination records.

The study found change points, dates when a substantial rise in autism occurred, and they
corresponded to the introduction of vaccines using human fetal cells: MMR, varicella, and hepatitis
A.

The study concluded: "Manufacture of childhood vaccines in human fetal cell lines, with its
associated retroviral and human DNA fragment contaminants, fulfills all of the necessary
requirements as a primary trigger for the ND [neurodevelopmental], autistic disorder."

Lo and behold, injecting human fetal cells, aside from violating the ethics of those who are prolife,
isn't a good idea for developing children.

Study 39: “Aluminuminduced entropy in biological systems: implications for neurological
disease.”
Full study: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jt/2014/491316/

Study 39 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. Aluminum is the vaccine industry’s dirty little secret. While
there was significant media talk of mercury in vaccines before, the media doesn’t want to touch
aluminum. Because, despite how toxic and unsafe it is, there is no replacement for the use of
aluminum as an adjuvant in vaccines. Widespread aluminum concern would cripple the vaccine
program.

This 2014 study is an extensive literature review of the aluminum and its negative effects on
biological systems, providing explanations on why aluminum is so bad to the body in particular the
central nervous system.

This summary of these biological mechanisms is as follows: “Aluminum induces entropy in living
organisms by disrupting all levels of structure from water molecules through all biosemiotic systems.
Entropyinducing cascades, feedback loops (positive and negative) within and across levels, can
damage DNAs, RNAs, proteins, cells, tissues, and whole organ systems. As a result of cellular
damage caused by an Al compound, injured and dying cells will release proteases, excitatory amino
acids, and ions (e.g., potassium, calcium), disrupting biosemiosis at many levels.”

The implications for spelled out in the conclusion: “a repeated low dose exposure may prove more
damaging than a single larger dose. Al and its compounds can cross biosemiotic levels, damaging
genetic systems, proteins, cells, and all systems up through the CNS. While higher doses may
rapidly affect multiple levels, as in dialysisassociated encephalopathy (DAE), low doses over time,
for example, from vaccines, can degrade metabolism and disrupt repair and defense systems and
can spiral out of control as in ASIA.”

The question for you is: are all the vaccines necessary for my child? There is a negative cost to more
vaccines. More vaccines doesn’t equate to more health.

Study 40: “Adverse events following immunization with vaccines containing adjuvants.”

Full text:
http://www.luontaisnetti.fi/hpv/2.%20Adverse%20events%20following%20immunizationASIA%20cro
ss%20sectional%20study%202013%20Serrpa%20Cruz.pdf

Study 40 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. Today we continue looking at adjuvants in vaccines and the
relationship with autoimmune disease.

Today’s study is a 2013 study from the journal of Immunocological Research. It does a
crosssectional analysis of those who show moderate to severe adverse events following
vaccinations. Those injured show signs of ASIA autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome.

The study reports: “Our results suggest that vaccines containing adjuvants may be associated with
an increased risk of autoimmune/ inflammatory adverse events following immunization…. The
clinical manifestations reported in this 43 patients involved different body systems such as
mucocutaneous, neurological, musculoskeletal and constitutional symptoms are comparable with the
data in medical literature.”

The study warns in the conclusion that adverse events may be more common than is currently
believed: “We believe that the underregistration of clinical data on medical records is because most
of postimmunization complaints are considered not relevant by patient and physician moreover some
signs and symptoms could be confounded with adverse events related to the vaccine itself.”

Study 41: "Adverse events following vaccination in premature
infants."

Study 41 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. Today's study looks at the the practice of vaccinating
premature infants. It seems this common practice leads to common serious sideeffect:
cardiorespiratory events.

In this 2001 this study from the journal Acta Paediatrica looked at 45 preterm infants who received
vaccinations. The study reported: "Apparent adverse events were noted in 17 of 45 (37.8%) babies:
9 (20%) had major events, i.e. apnoea, bradycardia or desaturations, and 8 (17.8%) had minor
events, i.e. increased oxygen requirements, temperature instability, poor handling and feed
intolerance... Age at vaccination of 70 days or less was significantly associated with increased risk (p
< 0.01). Of 27 babies vaccinated at 70 days or less, 9 (33.3%) developed major events compared
with none when vaccinated over 70 d."

The study concluded: "Vaccinerelated cardiorespiratory events are relatively common in preterm
babies. Problems were much more common if vaccine is administered at or before 70 days."
Study 42 : “A luminum adjuvant linked to Gulf War illness induces motor neuron death in
mice.”

Study 42 of 50 Vaccine Critical studies. Today we look at Gulf War Syndrome, a condition that
causes a wide ranges of symptoms including fatigue, muscle pain, cognitive problems, rashes, and
diarrhea. A startling 250,000 out of 697,000 US veterans from the 1991 Gulf War are affected by it.
This is such a significant proportion that you have to wonder what could all these affected soldiers
have in common? Could it be the anthrax vaccine?

Today’s 2007 study is from the journal of Neuromolecular Medicine. The study comments how
environmental factors such as the anthrax vaccine given to soldiers have come under scrutiny. This
study developed an animal model that exposed mice to the same amounts of aluminum adjuvant
that soldiers were exposed to from the vaccine. Then a battery of motor and cognitivebehavioral tests
were done on the animals over a 6mo period postinjections, and then later the central nervous systems
of the mice were examined.

The results were as follows: “Behavioral testing showed motor deficits in the aluminum treatment group
that expressed as a progressive decrease in strength measured by the wiremesh hang test (final deficit
at 24 wk; about 50%). Significant cognitive deficits in watermaze learning were observed in the combined
aluminum and squalene group (4.3 errors per trial) compared with the controls (0.2 errors per trial) after
20 wk… Aluminumtreated groups also showed significant motor neuron loss (35%) and increased
numbers of astrocytes (350%) in the lumbar spinal cord.”

The study concludes: “The findings suggest a possible role for the aluminum adjuvant in some
neurological features associated with GWI and possibly an additional role for the combination of
adjuvants.”

If aluminum adjuvant is shown to cause strength and cognitive impairment in animal models and possibly
related to Gulf War Syndrome in previously healthy adults, then why purposely inject shot after shot into
healthy infants? Doesn’t something seem wrong here?

Study 43: "Influenza vaccines: time for a rethink."

Study 43 of Vaccine Critical Studies! Flu vaccine this! Flu vaccine that! Everywhere you look
someone is pushing a flu vaccine!

Today's study is from the 2013 Journal of the American Medical Association. The author boldly
states on the abstract: "Officials and professional societies treat influenza as a major public health
threat for which the annual vaccine offers a safe and effective solution. In this article, I challenge
these basic assumptions."

The author bravely continues: "I show that there is no good evidence that vaccines reduce serious
complications of influenza, the outcomes the policy is meant to address... there are potential
vaccinerelated harms, as unexpected and serious adverse effects of influenza vaccines have
occurred. I argue that decisions surrounding influenza vaccines need to include a discussion of
these risks and benefits."

Whoever you are P. Doshi we applaud you.

Study 44: "Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18425905The

Study 44 out of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies! The flu vaccine push has taken on religious fervor to
make up for its lack of scientific rigor.
Today's 2012 study comes from the esteemed Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. It's a
group tasked with systematic review of previous studies. This group assessed overall vaccine
efficacy and children in children.
The findings present safety problems with the industry flu vaccine studies: "No safety comparisons
could be carried out, emphasising the need for standardisation of methods and presentation of
vaccine safety data in future studies. In specific cases, influenza vaccines were associated with
serious harms such as narcolepsy and febrile convulsions."
The authors conclude that biases are present in the studies: "An earlier systematic review of 274
influenza vaccine studies published up to 2007 found industryfunded studies were published in
more prestigious journals and cited more than other studies independently from methodological
quality and size. Studies funded from public sources were significantly less likely to report
conclusions favourable to the vaccines. The review showed that reliable evidence on influenza
vaccines is thin but there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions and spurious
notoriety of the studies. The content and conclusions of this review should be interpreted in the light
of this finding."
Lastly, the results indicate that flu vaccines for children under 2 aren't effective. There are mild
efficacy for children under 6 (6 children need to be vaccinated to prevent 1 flu case) and marginal
efficacy for children 6 and over (28 children need to be vaccinated to prevent 1 flu case). Even these
numbers are circumspect given the biases.

Study 45: “Suspected side effects to the quadrivalent human papilloma vaccine.”
Fullstudy:
http://www.danmedj.dk/portal/page/portal/danmedj.dk/dmj_forside/PAST_ISSUE/2015/DMJ_2015_0
4/A5064
Study 45 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. Now we tackle the HPV vaccine which is being targeted to
preteens and teens for "cancer prevention." This is a dramatic shift from addressing supposed
"clear dangers" to hypothetical dangers.

This 2015 retrospective study from the Danish Medical Journal examined 53 female patients with
suspected neurological side effects from the HPV vaccine. Before the vaccine, these girls had high
rates of physical activity. After the vaccine, 98% were unable to continue with daily activities and
75% had to quit school or work for at least two months.

The authors examined the patients and reported the following: "All patients had symptoms consistent
with pronounced autonomic dysfunction including different degrees of orthostatic intolerance, severe
nonmigrainelike headache, excessive fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, gastrointestinal discomfort and
widespread pain of a neuropathic character."

The authors conclude: "We found consist ency in the reported symptoms as well as between our
findings and those reported by others. Given the symptomatology, we suggest that the pathogenic
alteration is located in the autonomic nervous system."

While this type of study cannot be used to identify causation, the study corroborates findings in side
effects reported by others for HPV vaccines. The clustering of side effects possibly suggest the
vaccine may negatively affect the autonomic nervous system.

Study 46: "Acute infections as a means of cancer prevention: opposing effects to chronic
infections?"

Study 46 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. What if acute infection had a role in training the immune
system to function better? Similar to how muscles need exercises for optimal functioning what if
acute infections play a similar role for the immune system?

This 2006 study from the journal of Cancer Detection and Prevention looked at the recent
epidemiological evidence on the between acute infections and subsequent cancer development in
adult life, and examined the historical literature.

The study reported that: "Exposures to febrile infectious childhood diseases were associated with
subsequently reduced risks for melanoma, ovary, and multiple cancers combined, significant in the
latter two groups... Overall, risk reduction increased with the frequency of infections, with febrile
infections affording the greatest protection. In contrast to acute infections, chronic infections can be
viewed as resulting from a failed immune response and an increasing number have been associated
with an elevated cancer risk."

The conclusion is here: "Infections may play a paradoxical role in cancer development with chronic
infections often being tumorigenic and acute infections being antagonistic to cancer."

Well this entirely upends the paradigm of disease as mortal enemy and the idea that "more vaccines
== better." The authors bring up the significant question: what if the current vaccination practices end
up weakening the immune system and thereby set us up for chronic disease?

Study 47: “Children Who Have Received No Vaccines: Who Are They and Where Do They
Live?”
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/114/1/187

Study 47 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies! Just who are these people that dare refuse the kingly
mandates of the mandatory vaccine program? The provaccine authorities like to portray them as
uneducated and unscientific but is this the case?

A 2004 study from the journal of Pediatrics looked a histories of 151,720 children to determine
whether how family demographics differed between vaccinated vs. undervaccinated.

The results were as follows: "Unvaccinated children tended to be white, to have a mother who was
married and had a college degree, to live in a household with an annual income exceeding $75 000,
and to have parents who expressed concerns regarding the safety of vaccines and indicated that
medical doctors have little influence over vaccination decisions for their children."

Educated, affluent, empowered mothers are the ones likely to deeply examine the issue and their
own decision (R 17.0. 17 times more likely).

This also illustrates an important informational class divide. It seems the nonaffluent are more likely
to be influenced by provaccine authorities to take the vaccine by default.

Note this is a provaccine study. The authors express their preference that children be vaccinated.
It's the data that is important.

Study 48: “Vaccination practices among physicians and their children”
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=22932

Study 48 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. If we asked pediatricians, the ones who administer the shots
to kids, just how likely were they to follow the CDC guidelines what would they say?

This 2012 survey study from the Open Journal of Pediatrics sent a 14 question survey randomly to
1000 members of the Academy of Pediatrics in 2009. Two categories of questions included 1) how
physicians with children vaccinated them in the past, and 2) how all respondents would vaccinate a
child in 2009.

It seemed that many pediatricians would vaccinate differently than the CDC recommendations
(specialists pediatricians 21% and generalists pediatricians at 9%). The biggest concern was safety.
Specialists were more likely to delay the MMR vaccine.

There seems to be rising trend of doctors questioning the orthodoxy. People are waking up and
thinking for themselves. This makes me happy.

Study 49: “Medical Journals Are an Extension of the Marketing Arm of Pharmaceutical
Companies”
http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020138 \

Study 49 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. We are almost at the end here of the 50 studies. Here we
look at institutional corporations. Just how fair and unbiased are the ones “making the science”?
These 2005 study from the journal Public Library of Science examined just that question. They report
that 70% of clinical trials published in major journals are funded by the drug industry. Moreover they
are 400% more likely to report a favorable result for the funding company than studies funded from
other sources.
How do these companies get away with this? According to the study: “The companies seem to get
the results they want not by fiddling the results, which would be far too crude and possibly detectable
by peer review, but rather by asking the “right” questions—and there are many ways to do this...

there are many ways to hugely increase the chance of producing favourable results, and there are
many hired guns who will think up new ways and stay one jump ahead of peer reviewers.”
There you have it folks the sellout of modern medical science to corporate interests. We often forget
that actual human lives are on the line here. It makes me sick to my stomach.

Study 50: "The unofficial vaccine educators: are CDC funded nonprofits sufficiently
independent?"
http://www.bmj.com/content/359/bmj.j5104.full
http://vaccinesafetycommission.org/pdfs/bmj.j5104.full.pdf
Day 50 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. How much do you value freedom? Do you think you have
a right to decide what happens to your body? Could the CDC itself be waging a war on medical
freedom and the human rights that are intertwined with it?

Today we look at a 2017 paper published in the BMJ. Here the author looks at the marketing
practices of provaccine nonprofits. These same nonprofits were champions of SB277 which
removed the ability to "opt out" of the vaccination program in California and was the first step
towards an Orwellian truemandatory vaccine program.

However the strange part is that these nonprofits are funded by the vaccine manufacturers and
by the CDC itself! The paper calls out the truth that since these nonprofits are not
financiallyindependent from the vaccine authorities that their own recommendations cannot be
independent and unbiased. This is disturbing as the CDC by definition should not be engaged in
lobbying efforts.

The paper states: "these [provaccine nonprofit] groups are so strongly provaccination that the
public is getting a one sided message that all vaccines are created equal and vaccination is an
important public health strategy, regardless of the circumstances. This is as unhelpful as an
‘antivaxxer’ approach that assumes all vaccinations are harmful. Reality is a little different:
some vaccines are enormously important to public health; others are marginal at best and likely
best avoided.”

There you have it folks. Biased, corrupt messages from the vaccine authorities aimed at
removing your freedoms. Given this how much can we actually trust our vaccine authorities?
It's been quite a journey but it's time to close this saga.

I posted these 50 studies to show that the science shows that the question of vaccines is *not
settled* and the issue is much deeper than *provaccine vs. antivaccine.*

Two more bonus studies added below. Because they are just that good.

Bonus Study 1: “ Why the Corruption of the World Health Organization (WHO) is the
Biggest Threat to the World’s Public Health of Our Time”
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281876323_Why_the_Corruption_of_the_World_Healt
h_Organization_WHO_is_the_Biggest_Threat_to_the_World's_Public_Health_of_Our_Time

http://www.avensonline.org/wpcontent/uploads/JIMT23781343020004.pdf

Bonus Study 1 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies! The following piece regarding corruption within the
WHO is devastating and should make us all demand for reforms in our institutions.

This 2015 study from the Journal of Integrated Medical Therapy finds that many of the health
recommendations and mandates of the WHO are contrary to independent analysis and that of
the Cochrane Review, which has the highest quality medical research in the world. The WHO is
pushing drugs and vaccines known to be dangerous and doing so out of corruption by industry
interests. It seems these problems started when the WHO started accepting private money.

The study concluded: “it seems that the pharmaceutical industry has gained control over the
WHO system, leading to an extreme bias towards the use of not only ineffective and
unnecessary influenza vaccines and medicines, but also to the use of antipsychotics,
antidepressant, antianxiety and other psychopharmacological drugs, cytotoxic anticancer
chemotherapy, and a number of other drugs, which according to independent meta analyses
and Cochrane reviews are found to be without significant beneficial effect – and often
harmful. We recommend a fundamental revision of the WHOsystem that has proven itself weak
to the interests of the pharmaceutical industry.”

Now the WHO is a very powerful organization with vast influence of over the lives and health
and many individuals. It has powers to disrupt normal society and suspend human rights in the
face of an epidemic. Incorrect and biased recommendations from the the WHO, which have the
potential to cause serious side effects and deaths, across the global populace, is a threat to all
of us.

Bonus Study 2: “Aluminium in brain tissue in autism”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17308763

Bonus study 2 of 50 Vaccine Critical Studies. Really another bonus study? This study recently
came my way and it is a literal bomb drop. Folks it’s the aluminum.

This upcoming study to be published in the March 2018 issue of the Journal of Trace Elements
in Medicine and Biology looks at brain tissue donated from five individuals with autism for the
presence of aluminum.

They reported surprisingly high levels of aluminum: “The aluminium content of brain tissue in
autism was consistently high. The mean (standard deviation) aluminium content across all 5
individuals for each lobe were 3.82(5.42), 2.30(2.00), 2.79(4.05) and 3.82(5.17) μg/g dry wt. for
the occipital, frontal, temporal and parietal lobes respectively. These are some of the highest
values for aluminium in human brain tissue yet recorded and one has to question why, for
example, the aluminium content of the occipital lobe of a 15 year old boy would be 8.74 (11.59)
μg/g dry wt.”

The conclusion makes it clear: “We have made the first measurements of aluminium in brain
tissue in ASD and we have shown that the brain aluminium content is extraordinarily high… The
presence of aluminium in inflammatory cells in the meninges, vasculature, grey and white matter
is a standout observation and could implicate aluminium in the aetiology of ASD.”

Yup folks vaccines can cause autism, and the mechanism is aluminum.

50 Vaccine Studies For The Critical Thinker

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

50 Vaccine Studies For The Critical Thinker

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen