Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Master curve characterization of the fracture toughness behavior in SA508 Gr.4N low
alloy steels (https://ac.els-cdn.com/S0022311510002436/1-s2.0-S0022311510002436-
main.pdf?_tid=ad9f6659-816e-4d75-96c2-
0f14006cf968&acdnat=1548544469_c9abd616b448c266a8844601a2683a8c)
- Charpy impact test according to ASTM E1921-09c standard
- Invalid points can be determined using ASTM E1921 validity limit equation
- Weibull plot - grade 3 within theoretical predictions, but grade 4N higher slopes
- Fracture toughness - grade 3 within theoretical predictions, but grade 4N changes
more steeply with temperature
Characterization of transition behavior in SA508 Gr.4N Ni–Cr–Mo low alloy steels with
microstructural alteration by Ni and Cr contents (https://ac.els-
cdn.com/S0921509311009725/1-s2.0-S0921509311009725-main.pdf?_tid=3431f9ed-9cb3-
4f43-a83b-e797e5fdd27c&acdnat=1548544930_71b920fb72fc4945dd1bf9ad93c2c889)
- Charpy according to ASTM E23 and E1921 standards
- SA508 grade 4N: as Ni and Cr contents are increased, improved impact toughness
and fracture toughness are observed
- Ni is more important to impact toughness
- Cr is more important to fracture toughness
Comparison of fracture properties in SA508 Gr.3 and Gr.4N high strength low alloy
steels for advanced pressure vessel materials (https://ac.els-
cdn.com/S0308016115000460/1-s2.0-S0308016115000460-main.pdf?_tid=cb7009bd-c1de-
42fa-820d-bb42a3de2b88&acdnat=1548544564_dba2367732041bef2d9d65d543997584)
- SA508 grade 4N - tempered martensitic structure
- SA508 grade 3 (Class 1 and 2) - tempered upper bainitic structure
- SA508 grade 4N showed the best strength and transition behaviour
- SA508 grade 3 class 2 showed good strength and fracture toughness, but decreased
upper-self energy
- Aging behaviour of grade 4N needs further study (irradiation embrittlement
resistance)
Analysis of the master curve approach on the fracture toughness properties of SA508
Gr.4N Ni–Mo–Cr low alloy steels for reactor pressure vessels (https://ac.els-
cdn.com/S0921509310002297/1-s2.0-S0921509310002297-main.pdf?_tid=863e8634-e938-
440d-89c5-55db419d8d24&acdnat=1548544585_65974a0469bf6cfefbda81212b91a290)
- Fracture toughness test results -> deviation from the predicted curve at low
temperatures
- Just like in “Master table...” paper, they changed the exponential parameter to fit an
appropriate curve
I also found a presentation given by David W. Gandy (FASM Nuclear Materials Electric
Power Research Institute) in collaboration with Roll-Royce, Hitachi, Carpenter and the US
department of Energy. It compares Additive Manufacturing to HIP (page 10), and
characterises SA508 grade 3, which is the one currently used in the nuclear industry as a
Reactor Pressure Vessel Steel (page 24). The chemical composition is shown at page 25,
tempering (page 26), tensile test results (page 27-28) and Charpy impact test (page 29-30).
Link: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/10/f34/05%20-
%20Innovative%20Manufacturing%20Process%20for%20Nuclear%20Power%20Plant%20C
omponents%20via%20Powder%20Metallurgy%20and%20Hot%20Isostatic%20Processing%
20Methods_0.pdf