TRANSPORTATION LAW MAR 29 ASSIGNMENT Page 1 of 3

PART II - AVIATION LAW CHAPTER 8 - OBLIGATIONS OF CARRIER IN AIR

TRANSPORTATION

CHAPTER 7 - THE AIRCRAFT AND CIVIL AVIATION

1. EXTRA-ORDINARY DILIGENCE IN AIR

1. APPLICABLE LAW
TRANSPORTATION

1.01 REGULATORY PERSPECTIVES

1.01 AIRWORTHINESS

*Case: 2. TARIFF SYSTEM

KUWAIT AIRWAYS, CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. PHILIPPINE  3. CARE OF BAGGAGE

AIRLINES, INC., respondent.  [G.R. No. 156087. May 8, 2009.]

*Cases: 

(a) PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., petitioner, vs. COURT OF

2. CIVIL AVIATION
APPEALS and GILDA C. MEJIA, respondents. [G.R. No. 119706.
3. REGISTRATION OF AIRCRAFT
March 14, 1996.]

4. RECORDING OF CONVEYANCES 
(b) UNITED AIRLINES, petitioner, vs. WILLIE J. UY, respondent.
5. MARINE INSURANCE
[G.R. No. 127768. November 19, 1999.]

6. AIR TRANSPORTATION IN GENERAL

(c) BRITISH AIRWAYS, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS, GOP
7. PERSONS INVOLVED IN AIR TRANSPORTATION
MAHTANI, and PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, respondents. [G.R. No.
8. CHARTER OF AIRCRAFT
121824. January 29, 1998.]

9. SOVEREIGNTY AND AIR FREEDOMS

(d) PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., petitioner, vs. COURT OF
9.01 FREEDOMS OF THE AIR
APPEALS, DR. JOSEFINO MIRANDA and LUISA
*Case: MIRANDA, respondents. [G.R. No. 119641. May 17, 1996.]

KUWAIT AIRWAYS, CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. PHILIPPINE 
AIRLINES, INC., respondent.  [G.R. No. 156087. May 8, 2009.]
4. DUTY TO PASSENGER

*Cases:

9.02 CANCELLATION OF COMMERCIAL AGREEMENT

(a) ANICETO G. SALUDO, JR., MARIA SALVACION SALUDO,
9.03 CABOTAGE
LEOPOLDO G. SALUDO and SATURNINO
G. SALUDO, petitioners, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, TRANS
WORLD AIRLINES, INC., and PHILIPPINE AIRLINES,
INC., respondents.  [G.R. No. 95536. March 23, 1992.]

(b) CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS, LTD., petitioner, vs. SPOUSES

DANIEL VAZQUEZ and MARIA LUISA MADRIGAL
VAZQUEZ, respondents. [G.R. No. 150843. March 14, 2003.]

(c) JAPAN AIRLINES, petitioner, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS,

ENRIQUE AGANA, MARIA ANGELA NINA AGANA, ADALIA B.
FRANCISCO and JOSE MIRANDA,respondents.  [G.R. No.
118664. August 7, 1998.]

TRANSPORTATION LAW MAR 29 ASSIGNMENT Page 2 of 3

(d) NORTHWEST AIRLINES, petitioner, vs. DELFIN S.
CATAPANG, respondent. [G.R. No. 174364. July 30, 2009.]

(e) NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC., petitioner, vs. SPOUSES

EDWARD J. HESHAN AND NELIA L. HESHAN AND DARA
GANESSA L. HESHAN, REPRESENTED BY HER PARENTS
EDWARD AND NELIA HESHAN, respondents. [G.R. No. 179117.
February 3, 2010.]

(f) VICTORINO SAVELLANO, VIRGINIA B. SAVELLANO and

DEOGRACIAS
B. SAVELLANO, petitioners, vs. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, respon
dent.  [G.R. No. 151783. July 8, 2003.]

4.01 DENIED BOARDING OF PASSENGERS

*Cases: 

(a) PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INCORPORATED, petitioner, vs.

COURT OF APPEALS and SPOUSES MANUEL S. BUNCIO and
AURORA R. BUNCIO, Minors DEANNA R. BUNCIO and NIKOLAI
R. BUNCIO, assisted by their Father, MANUEL S. BUNCIO, and
JOSEFA REGALADO, represented by her Attorney-in-Fact,
MANUEL S. BUNCIO, respondents. [G.R. No. 123238.
September 22, 2008.]

(b) UNITED AIRLINES, INC., petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS,

ANICETO FONTANILLA in his personal capacity and in behalf of
his minor son MYCHAL ANDREW
FONTANILLA, respondents. [G.R. No. 124110. April 20, 2001.]

4.02 BILL OF RIGHTS FOR AIR PASSENGERS

5. INSPECTION OF AIRCRAFT AND CARGO

5.01 APPLICABLE LAW

TRANSPORTATION LAW MAR 29 ASSIGNMENT Page 3 of 3

(b) SABENA BELGIAN WORLD AIRLINES, petitioner, vs. HON.
CHAPTER 9 - THE WARSAW CONVENTION
COURT OF APPEALS and MA. PAULA SAN
1. BINDING EFFECT
AGUSTIN, respondents.[G.R. No. 104685. March 14, 1996.]

2. PURPOSES
(c) PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., petitioner, vs. THE COURT OF
*Case: PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., petitioner, vs. HON. APPEALS and CHUA MIN, respondents. [G.R. No. L-44936.
ADRIANO SAVILLO, Presiding Judge of RTC Branch 30, Iloilo September 25, 1992.]

City, and SIMPLICIO GRIÑO, respondents. [G.R. No. 149547. (d) BRITISH AIRWAYS, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS,
July 4, 2008.]
GOP MAHTANI, and PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, respondents. [G.R.
No. 121824. January 29, 1998.]

3. CONSTITUTIONALITY
(e) PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., petitioner, vs. COURT OF
4. COVERAGE
APPEALS and GILDA C. MEJIA, respondents. [G.R. No. 119706.
5. MEANING OF INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION
March 14, 1996.]

*Case: PURITA S. MAPA, CARMINA S. MAPA and CORNELIO

P. MAPA, petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS AND TRANS- 9. TORT LIABILITY

WORLD AIRLINES INC., respondents. [G.R. No. 122308. July 8, *Case: ALITALIA, petitioner, vs. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE
1997.]
COURT and FELIPA E. PABLO, respondents. [G.R. No. 71929.
December 4, 1990.]

6. PERIOD COVERED BY INTERNATIONAL

TRANSPORTATION
10. VENUE OF ACTION

7. WHEN INTERNATIONAL CARRIER IS LIABLE

11. NOTICE OF CLAIM OR COMPLAINT

8. LIMIT OF LIABILITY
11.01 NOTICE OF CLAIM

*Case: ALITALIA, petitioner, vs. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE 12. PRESCRIPTION

COURT and FELIPA E. PABLO, respondents. [G.R. No. 71929. 12.01 NATURE OF PRESCRIPTIVE PERIOD

December 4, 1990.]
12.02 NOT APPLICABLE TO OTHER CAUSE OF ACTION

13. SUCCESSIVE CARRIERS

*Case: LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES, petitioner, vs. COURT
8.01 MONTREAL AGREEMENT AND CAB RULES ON LIMIT OF OF APPEALS and TIRSO V. ANTIPORDA,
LIABILITY
SR., respondents. [G.R. No. 83612. November 24, 1994.]

8.02 TARIFF LIMITATIONS

8.03 DEFENSES AGAINST LIMIT OF LIABILITY

13.01 LIABILITY OF AGENT

*Cases:
14. FORMALITIES

(a) CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS, LTD, petitioner, vs. COURT OF 14.01 EFFECT OF NON-COMPLIANCE

APPEALS and TOMAS L. ALCANTARA, respondents. [G.R. No.
60501. March 5, 1993.]