Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

Review Form

Please review the attached article. Review should be based on your expert analysis, good information
on the subject of the article and the relevant literature. Please review to point out any deficiencies in the
text and, if necessary, provide instruction on the amendments or modifications to the text.

General data on paper

Paper Title: Reviewer’s Form


Author(s):

[1] Evaluation Criteria

Article Yes No Comment


1 This article fits the scope of the journal.
2 The Title of This Article:
* Concise and accurate
* Explain the content/article field as accurate as possible
3 The Abstract Contain:
* The purpose and focus of the study (why study is carried out)
* Materials and methods (how research is conducted)
* Discovery (main result)
* Important and main conclusions
4 The Introduction of The Article:
* Attract reader
* Moving towards hypothesis/main theme
5 Presentation and Organization of The Content Is
Satisfactory
6 Methods/Methodology
* Contain a design study
* Explain all methods used
7 The Results:
* Is stated clear and simple
* Only provide the major findings in the table/figure
* Does not contain errors in terms of facts, assessment and
calculation.
* Present the Table/Figure/Graph in A Proper form.
* Provide numbered table/figure.
8 Discussion and Conclusion:
* Link the study with research questions
* Shows how the results coincide or not with the results of
previous study.
* Discuss the implications of the study
* State the conclusion by giving evidence to the findings
* Provide recommendations for further study
9 Reference:
* List of references – detail order of the reference is available at

1
the end of the article.
* The references are adequate and relevant
10 Language: (Report Errors and Proposed Corrections Should Be Provided As An
Attachment If Necessary)
* Use scholarly language
* Good grammar and selection of words.
* The use of compliant and updated terminologies
* No complex sentences that are elusive
* No hanging sentence
* No "jargon"

[2] Reviewer's recommendation


Mark with "X" one of the options.

You state the article should:


1 Publish as it is
2 Conditionally accept with minor revisions
3 Conditionally accept with the necessary changes as recommended by reviewer
4 The article should be thoroughly changed
5 Reject

[3] General remarks and recommendations of reviewer

[4] Details of reviewer

Name:

Institution:

Date:

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen