Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

7 .

8 The Progression Adjustment Factor and Arrival Type 28 1

PVG = percentage of vehicles arriving on green, expressed as a proportion ,


g/C = proportion of green time available, an d
fp = supplemental adjustment factor for when the platoon arrives during the green .
(The value offp is based on arrival type, as shown in Table 7 .6 . )

It is possible for the calculated value of PF from Eq . 7.31 to exceed 1 .0 for Arriva l
Type 4 with extremely low values of g/C . As a practical matter, PF should b e
assigned a maximum value of 1 .0 for Arrival Type 4 .

Table 7.6 Progression Adjustment Factor Values

ARRIVAL TYPE (AT)


AT-1 AT-2 AT-3 AT-4 AT-5 AT- 6
Defaultf 1 .00 0 .93 1 .00 1 .15 1 .00 1 .00
Reproduced with permission of the Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual 2000 ,
Copyright, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D .C. Exhibit 16-12, p . 16-20 .

Because direct measurements of PVG in the field are very rare, even for detaile d
operational analyses, the following equation may be used to estimate PVG.

PVG = Rp ( g t / C) (7.32)

where

Rp = platoon ratio (the value of Rp is based on arrival type as well, and default values t o
use in Eq . 7 .32 can be obtained from Table 7 .7),
C = cycle length in seconds ,
g, = effective green time for lane group i in seconds, an d
Other terms as previously defined .

Table 7 .7 Relationship Between Arrival Type and Platoon Ratio (Rp)

Arrival type Range of platoon ratio (Rp) Default value (Rp)


AT-1 < 0 .50 0 .33 3
AT-2 > 0.50 and 0.85 0.66 7
AT-3 > 0.85 and < 1 .15 1 .00 0
AT-4 > 1 .15 and < 1 .50 1 .33 3
AT-5 > 1 .50 and 2 .00 1 .66 7
AT-6 > 2 .00 2 .000
Reproduced with permission of the Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual 2000 ,
Copyright, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D .C. Exhibit 16-11, p. 16-20 .

When an arrival type is estimated or assumed, a default value for Rp can be selected ,
which can then be used in Eq. 7 .32. The resulting PVG value from Eq. 7 .32 can b e
used in Eq. 7 .31, along with the appropriate fp value for the chosen arrival type, t o
calculate the progression adjustment factor . Note that the selection of an arrival typ e
underlies the entire procedure for calculating PF.
282 Chapter 7 Traffic Control and Analysis at Signalized Intersection s

If the PVG is actually measured in the field, then the arrival type can b e
determined directly . Equation 7 .32 can be rearranged to solve for R p and thi s
calculated value can be used with the middle column of Table 7 .7 to determin e
arrival type .

EXAMPLE 7 .18

Progression quality for through traffic arrivals at an intersection approach is characterize d


as favorable . The g/C for this movement is 0 .4 . Determine the progression adjustmen t
factor.
SOLUTION

Favorable progression quality corresponds to arrival type 4 . From Table 7 .6, a value of 1 .1 5
is obtained for fp . From Table 7 .7, a value of 1 .333 is obtained for Rp . Applying Eq . 7 .32 ,

PVG =1 .333(0 .4 )
= 0 .53 3

Applying Eq . 7 .31,

_ (1—0 .533)1 .1 5
PF,
1-(0 .4 )
= 0 .895
This result is reasonable because it is expected that favorable progression quality, or better ,
will generally result in a PF less than 1 .0, which when multiplied by d i in Eq . 7 .14 wil l
reduce the overall signal delay .

EXAMPLE 7.19

An intersection phase has an effective green time of 40 seconds . The cycle length is 12 0
seconds . A total of 85 vehicles arrived during the effective green, and a total of 200 vehicle s
arrived during the entire cycle . What is the estimated arrival type for this situation ?
SOLUTION

The g/C ratio is

g_ 40
=0 .33 3
C 12 0

The percentage of vehicles arriving on green i s

85
PVG = = 0 .42 5
200

Applying Eq . 7 .32, and rearranging to solve for Rp,

0 .42 5 =
Rp = 1 .27 6
0 .33 3

From Table 7 .7, this corresponds to arrival type 4 .


References 283

NOMENCLATURE FOR CHAPTER 7


a deceleration rate for vehicle at an intersectio n P~ proportion of the signal cycle with a queu e
AR all-red time (D/D/1 queuing )
C cycle length P,. proportion of stopped vehicles (D/D/ 1
Cm ; minimum cycle length queuing )
Cap , optimum cycle length PF progression adjustment facto r
c capacity Q number of vehicles in the queu e
davg average vehicle delay per cycle (D/D/ 1 Qmax maximum number of vehicles in queue (D/D/ 1
queuing ) queuing)
di average vehicle delay per cycle assuming r effective red time
uniform arrival s R displayed red time
d2 average vehicle delay per cycle assumin g s saturation flow rate
random arrival s S, pedestrian walking spee d
d3 average vehicle delay per cycle due to initia l t time
queue at start of analysis time perio d time after the start of effective green unti l
dd distance from the intersection for which th e queue clearance (D/D/1 queuing )
dilemma zone is avoided t 1, total lost time for a movement during a cycl e
dmax maximum delay of any vehicle (D/D/ 1 tr driver perception/reaction tim e
queuing ) v analysis flow rat e
D deterministic arrivals or departure s V travel speed of vehicl e
Df total vehicle delay (D/D/1 queuing ) w width of stree t
g effective green time or acceleration due t o WE effective crosswalk widt h
gravit y X, volume-to-capacity ratio for lane group i
G displayed green time or grade of roadwa y X. critical volume-to-capacity ratio for the
G,, pedestrian green tim e intersection
1 upstream filtering/metering adjustment facto r x, distance required to sto p
k delay adjustment factor dependent on signa l Y displayed yellow tim e
controller mod e sum of flow ratios for critical lane group s
1 vehicle length • arrival rate
L total cycle lost time or crosswalk lengt h P departure rate
n number of phases or number of vehicles or P traffic intensit y
number of critical lane group s
Nped number of crossing pedestrians per phas e

REFERENCE S
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) . Traffic Transportation Research Board . Highway Capacity
Engineering Handbook, 5th ed. Washington, DC , Manual, Washington, DC : National Research
1999 . Council, 2000 .
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) . Traffic U .S . Federal Highway Administration . Manual on
Control Devices, 2nd ed. Washington, DC, 2001 . Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets an d
Kell, James H ., and Iris J . Fullerton . Manual of Traffi c Highways . Washington, DC : U.S . Government
Signal Design, 2nd ed . Washington, DC : Institut e Printing Office, 2000 .
of Transportation Engineers, 1998 . Webster, F . V . Traffic Signal Settings, Road Research
Transportation Research Board . Traffic Flow Theory : A Technical Paper No . 39 . London : Great Britai n
Monograph . Special Report 165 . Washington, DC : Road Research Laboratory, 1958 .
National Research Council, 1975 .
284 Chapter 7 Traffic Control and Analysis at Signalized Intersection s

PROBLEM S

7 .1 An intersection approach has a saturation flow rate saturation flow rate of the approach is 1800 veh/h, th e
of 1500 veh/h, and vehicles arrive at the approach at the cycle length is 60 seconds, and the effective green time
rate of 800 veh/h . The approach is controlled by a is 40 seconds. Determine the total vehicle delay unti l
pretimed signal with a cycle length of 60 seconds an d complete queue clearance . (Assume D/D/1 queuing . )
D/D/1 queuing holds . Local standards dictate tha t 7.7 The saturation flow rate for an intersectio n
signals should be set such that all approach queue s approach is 3600 veh/h . At the beginning of a cycle
dissipate 10 seconds before the end of the effective (effective red) no vehicles are queued . The signal i s
green portion of the cycle . Assuming that approac h timed so that when the queue (from the continuousl y
capacity exceeds arrivals, determine the maximu m arriving vehicles) is 13 vehicles long, the effectiv e
length of effective red that will satisfy the local green begins . If the queue dissipates 8 seconds befor e
standards . the end of the cycle and the cycle length is 60 seconds ,
7.2 An approach to a pretimed signal has 30 seconds o f what is the arrival rate, assuming D/D/1 queuing ?
effective red, and D/D/1 queuing holds . The total delay 7 .8 The saturation flow rate for a pretimed signalize d
at the approach is 83 .33 veh-s/cycle and the saturatio n intersection approach is 1800 veh/h . The cycle length i s
flow rate is 1000 vehlh . If the capacity of the approac h 80 seconds . It is known that the arrival rate during th e
equals the number of arrivals per cycle, determine th e effective green is twice the arrival rate during th e
approach flow rate and cycle length . effective red . During one cycle, there are 2 vehicles i n
7 .3 An approach to a pretimed signal has 25 seconds o f the queue at the beginning of the cycle (the beginning o f
effective green in a 60-second cycle . The approac h the effective red) and there are 8 vehicles in the queue a t
volume is 500 veh/h and the saturation flow rate is 140 0 the end of the effective red (the beginning of th e
vehlh . Calculate the average vehicle delay assumin g effective green) . If the queue clears exactly at the end of
D/D/1 queuing. the effective green and D/D/1 queuing applies ,
7 .4 An observer notes that an approach to a pretimed determine the total vehicle delay in the cycle (in veh-s) .
signal has a maximum of eight vehicles in a queue in a 7 .9 An approach to a signalized intersection has a
given cycle . If the saturation flow rate is 1440 veh/h and saturation flow rate of 1800 veh/h. At the beginning of
the effective red time is 40 seconds, how much time will an effective red, there are six vehicles in the queue and
it take this queue to clear after the start of the effectiv e vehicles arrive at 900 veh/h . The signal has a 60-second
green (assuming that approach capacity exceeds arrival s cycle with 25 seconds of effective red . What is the tota l
and D/D/1 queuing applies)? vehicle delay after one cycle (assume D/D/1 queuing) ?
7 .5 An approach to a pretimed signal with a 60-secon d 7 .10 An approach to a signalized intersection has a
cycle has 9 vehicles in the queue at the beginning of th e saturation flow rate of 2640 veh/h . For one cycle, th e
effective green . Four of the 9 vehicles in the queue ar e approach has 3 vehicles in queue at the beginning of a n
left over from the previous cycle (at the end of th e effective red, and vehicles arrive at 1064 veh/h . Th e
previous cycle's effective green) . The saturation flow signal for the approach is timed such that the effectiv e
rate of the approach is 1500 veh/h, total delay for the green starts 8 seconds after the approach's vehicl e
cycle is 5 .78 vehicle-minutes, and at the end of the queue reaches 10 vehicles, and lasts 15 seconds . What i s
effective green there are 2 vehicles left in the queue . the total delay for this signal cycle?
Determine the arrival rate assuming that it is unchange d 7 .11 An approach has a saturation flow rate of 180 0
over the duration of the observation period (from th e veh/h . During one 80-second cycle, there are 4 vehicle s
beginning to the end of this 5 .78-vehicle-minute delay queued at the beginning of the cycle (the start of th e
cycle) . (Assume D/D/1 queuing . ) effective red) and 2 vehicles queued at the end of th e
7 .6 At the beginning of an effective red, vehicles are cycle (the end of the effective green) . At the beginnin g
arriving at an approach at the rate of 500 veh/h and 1 6 of the effective green there are 10 vehicles in the queue .
vehicles are left in the queue from the previous cycle (a t The arrival rate is constant and the process is D/D/1 . I f
the end of the previous cycle's effective green) . the effective red is known to be less than 40 seconds ,
However, due to the end of a major sporting event, th e what is the total vehicle delay for this signal cycle ?
arrival rate is continuously increasing at a constant rat e 7 .12 Vehicles arrive at an approach to a pretime d
of 200 veh/h/min (after 1 minute the arrival rate will b e signalized intersection . The arrival rate over the cycle is
700 veh/h, after 2 minutes 900 veh/h, etc .) . The
Problems 28 5

given by the function At) = 0 .22 + 0 .0121 [2(t) is i n capacity ratio (22C/,ug) is 0 .8, the saturation flow rate i s
veh/s and t is in seconds] . There are no vehicles in the 1600 veh/h, and the effective green time is 50 seconds .
queue when the cycle (effective red) begins . The cycl e If the uniform delay (assuming D/D/1 queuing) is 11 .2 5
length is 60 seconds and the saturation flow rate is 360 0 seconds per vehicle, determine the arrival flow rate (i n
veh/h . Determine the effective green and red times tha t veh/h) and the cycle length .
will allow the queue to clear exactly at the end of th e 7 .16 An intersection has a three-phase signal with th e
cycle (the end of the effective green), and determine th e movements allowed in each phase, and correspondin g
total vehicle delay over the cycle (assuming D/D/ 1 analysis and saturation flow rates shown in Table 7 .6 .
queuing) . Calculate the sum of the flow ratios for the critical lan e
7 .13 At the start of the effective red at an intersection groups .
approach to a pretimed signal, vehicles begin to arrive at 7 .17 An intersection has a four-phase signal with the
a rate of 800 veh/h for the first 40 seconds and 50 0 movements allowed in each phase and correspondin g
veh/h from then on . The approach has a saturation flo w analysis and saturation flow rates shown in Table 7 .7 .
rate of 1200 veh/h and an effective green of 20 seconds , Calculate the sum of the flow ratios for the critical lane
and the cycle length is 40 seconds . What is the total groups .
vehicle delay two full cycles after the 800-veh/h arriva l
rate begins? (Assume D/D/1 queuing . ) 7.18 The minimum cycle length for an intersection i s
determined to be 95 seconds . The critical lane grou p
7.14 An approach to a pretimed signal has 25 second s flow ratios were calculated as 0 .235, 0 .250, 0 .170, and
of effective green, a saturation flow rate of 1300 veh/h , 0 .125, for phases 1-4, respectively. What XX was used i n
and a volume-to-capacity ratio less than 1 . If the cycl e the determination of this cycle length, assuming a los t
length is 60 seconds and the overall delay formula (Eq. time of 5 seconds per phase ?
7 .14) estimates an average delay that is 34 s greater than
that estimated by using just the uniform delay formula , 7 .19 A pretimed four-phase signal has critical lan e
determine the vehicle arrival rate . (Assume the signal i s group flow rates for the first three phases of 200, 187 ,
isolated and d3 = 0 . ) and 210 veh/h (saturation flow rates are 1800 veh/h/l n
for all phases) . The lost time is known to be 4 seconds
7 .15 Recent computations at an approach to a pretimed- for each phase . If the cycle length is 60 seconds, what i s
signalized intersection indicate that the volume-to - the estimated effective green time of the fourth phase ?

Data for Problem 7 .1 6


Phase 1 2 3
Allowed movements NB L, SB L NB T/R, SB T/R EB L, WB L
EB T/R, WB T/R
Analysis flow rate 330, 365 veh/h 1125, 1075 veh/h 110, 80 veh/ h
250, 285 veh/h
Saturation flow rate 1700, 1750 veh/h 3400, 3300 veh/h 650, 600 veh/h
1750, 1800 veh/h

Data for Problem 7 .1 7


Phase 1 2 3 4
Allowed movements EB L, WB L EB T/R, WB T/R SB L, SB T/R NB L, NB T/R
Analysis flow rate 245, 230 veh/h 975, 1030 veh/h 255, 235 veh/h 225, 215 veh/h
Saturation flow rate 1750, 1725 veh/h 3350, 3400 veh/h 1725, 1750 veh/h 1700, 1750 veh/h
286 Chapter 7 Traffic Control and Analysis at Signalized Intersection s

7 .20 A four-phase traffic signal has critical lane group level of service for the westbound approach, assumin g
flow ratios of 0 .225, 0 .175, 0 .200, and 0 .150 . If the lost all else remains the same . Assume other required input
time per phase is 5 seconds and a critical intersectio n values are as in Table 7 .5 .
v/c of 0 .85 is desired, calculate the minimum cycl e 7 .36 For Problem 7 .35, calculate the new level o f
length and the phase effective green times such that th e service for the northbound approach .
lane group v/c ratios are equalized .
7 .37 Consider the intersection of Vine and Mapl e
7 .21 For Problem 7 .16, calculate the minimum cycle Streets as shown in Fig . 7 .10 . Suppose Vine Street' s
length and the effective green time for each phas e northbound and southbound approaches are both on a n
(balancing v/c for the critical lane groups) . Assume th e 8% upgrade, and the assumed vehicle approach spee d
lost time is 4 seconds per phase and a critica l is 30 mi/h . What should the yellow and all-red time s
intersection v/c of 0 .90 is desired . be?
7 .22 For Problem 7 .21, calculate the northbound 7 .38 Consider Example 7 .8 . Two additional 12-f t
approach delay and level of service . through lanes are added to Vine Street (the street in th e
7 .23 For Problem 7 .21, calculate the southboun d intersection shown in Fig . 7 .10), one lane in each
approach delay and level of service . direction . If the peak-hour traffic volumes ar e
7 .24 For Problem 7 .21, calculate the westboun d unchanged, but the Vine Street left-turn saturation flo w
approach delay and level of service . rates increase by 100 veh/h because of the adde d
through lanes, what would the revised effective gree n
7 .25 For Problem 7 .21, calculate the eastboun d time, yellow time, and all-red time be for each phase ?
approach delay and level of service . Assume minimum cycle length and a critica l
7 .26 For Problem 7 .21, calculate the overall intersection v/c of 0 .90 is desired .
intersection delay and level of service . 7 .39 Calculate the overall intersection level of service
7 .27 For Problem 7 .16, calculate the optimal cycle for Problem 7 .38 . Assume other required input values
length (Webster's formulation) and the correspondin g are as in Table 7 .5 .
effective green times (based on lane group v/c 7 .40 Consider Problem 7 .38 . Calculate the ne w
equalization) . Assume lost time is 4 seconds per phase . minimum pedestrian green time, assuming the effectiv e
7 .28 For Problem 7 .17, calculate the minimum cycl e crosswalk width is 6 ft and the maximum number o f
length and the effective green time for each phase crossing pedestrians in any phase is 20 .
(balancing v/c for the critical movements) . Assume th e 7 .41 Consider Problem 7 .38 . How much traffi c
lost time is 4 seconds per phase and a critical volume can be added to the southbound approac h
intersection v/c of 0 .95 is desired . (assuming the same turning movement percentage )
7 .29 For Problem 7 .28, calculate the northboun d before LOS D is reached for the approach ?
approach delay and level of service . 7.42 Consider Problem 7 .38 . How much traffic
7 .30 For Problem 7 .28, calculate the southboun d volume must be diverted from the eastbound approac h
approach delay and level of service . (assuming the same turning movement percentage) t o
7 .31 For Problem 7 .28, calculate the westbound achieve LOS B for the approach ?
approach delay and level of service . 7 .43 The progression quality of a signalize d
7.32 For Problem 7 .28, calculate the eastbound intersection approach is highly favorable with a
approach delay and level of service . progression adjustment factor of 0 .641 . What is the g/C
ratio for this approach ?
7 .33 For Problem 7 .28, calculate the overall
intersection delay and level of service . 7 .44 At one signalized intersection approach, 66
vehicles, on average, arrive during the 30-second
7 .34 For Problem 7 .17, calculate the optimal cycle effective green time. During the rest of the cycle, 105
length (Webster's formulation) and the correspondin g vehicles, on average, arrive at the intersection. Th e
effective green times (based on lane group v/c cycle length is 100 seconds . What is the arrival typ e
equalization) . Assume lost time is 4 seconds per phase . for this approach ?
7 .35 A new shopping center opens near the 7.45 For Problem 7 .44, determine the progressio n
intersection of Vine and Maple Streets (the intersectio n adjustment factor .
shown in Fig . 7 .10) . The net effect is to increase the
approaching traffic volumes by 10% . Calculate the new

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen