INTRODUCTION

Respondents in this study are blood donors from the National Blood Centre, Kuala Lumpur. Total number of respondents are 40. These blood donors
answered a set of questionnaire comprised of attitude towards blood donation, intention to donate blood and demographic variables.

CHAP 3: MEAN, MODE AND MEDIAN

Item: Blood donation is a good act

1 = strongly disagree
2 = disagree
3 = sometimes disagree/agree
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree

Statistics
Item: Good Act
N Valid 40
Missing 0
Mean 4.7500
Median 5.0000
Mode 5.00

Mean:
In this data, the descriptive analysis showed that the mean value for the item ‘blood donation is a good act’ is 4.750. In other words, the average point (value)
for this item is 4.750, meaning that for these respondents; they agreed that blood donation is a good act.
Median:
In this data, the median is 5.00. the data showed that the midpoint of the distribution is 5.000. in other words, the value showed that the scores are divided into
two equal groups with the midpoint of 5.000.
Mode:
In this data, the mode is 5.00. Meaning that, the value of 5 which is strongly agree has the greatest frequency. This data indicates that the respondents
strongly agree that blood donation is a good act.

1
CHAPTER 4: STANDARD DEVIATION AND VARIANCE
Item: Blood donation is a good act
1 = strongly disagree
2 = disagree
3 = sometimes disagree/agree
4 = agree
5 = strongly agree

Statistics
Item: Good act

N Valid 40

Missing 0
Std. Deviation .43853
Variance .192

Standard deviation:
From the item ‘blood donation is a good act’ the standard deviation is .439. Meaning that for this item, the data is not clustered closely around the mean
(4.750) as the standard deviation is at .439, which means the data is more diverse.

2
CHAPTER 10: T-TEST FOR TWO INDEPENDENT SAMPLES
HO: There is no significant different between working and non-working blood donors towards the attitude in blood donation.

Group Statistics
Std. Error
D_10StatusOccupation N Mean Std. Deviation Mean
SumScore_Attitud Working 32 53.4063 5.62173 .99379
e Not working 8 53.3750 3.70087 1.30845

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
95% Confidence Interval
Sig. (2- Mean Std. Error of the Difference
F Sig. t df tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper
SumScore_Attitude Equal variances
2.410 .129 .015 38 .988 .03125 2.10301 -4.22608 4.28858
assumed
Equal variances not
.019 16.189 .985 .03125 1.64307 -3.44860 3.51110
assumed

Result: Fail to reject HO. There is no significant different between working and non-working blood donors towards attitude in blood donation.
From the analysis of the independent sample t-test, it showsb that there is no significant difference in attitude towards blood donation between
working (M=53.406) and non-working (M=53.375), t(38)= .015, p=.988.

3
CHAPTER 11: T-TEST FOR TWO RELATED SAMPLES
HO: There is no significant different in perceived painful among respondents before and after donation

Paired Samples Statistics

Std. Error
Mean N Std. Deviation Mean
Pair 1 A3_Attitude_BeforeDonat
4.1750 40 .71208 .11259
ion_Painful
A3_ Attitude
2.6250 40 1.39021 .21981
_AfterDonation_Painful

Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.
Pair 1 A3_ Attitude
_BeforeDonation_Painful
40 .042 .797
& A3_ Attitude
_AfterDonation_Painful

Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences
95% Confidence Interval of the
Std. Error Difference
Mean Std. Deviation Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Pair 1 A3_ Attitude
_BeforeDonation_Painful
1.55000 1.53506 .24271 1.05906 2.04094 6.386 39 .000
- A3_ Attitude
_AfterDonation_Painful
Result: Reject HO. There is significant different in perceived painful among respondents before and after donation.

4
From the analysis of the paired sample t-test, it shows that there is significant difference in attitude towards blood donation before donation
(M=4.175) and after donation (M=2.625), t(39)= 6.386, p=.001. This result indicates that before the blood donation, the respondents feel the act would
be painful. However, after the blood donation the respondents perception changes as they feel it is less painful.

5
CHAPTER 12: ANOVA

Descriptives
SumScore_ Attitude
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum
Majority Malay 18 53.4444 5.26053 1.23992 50.8284 56.0604 45.00 60.00
Majority
5 47.4000 5.31977 2.37908 40.7946 54.0054 40.00 53.00
Chinese
Mixed 17 55.1176 4.04479 .98100 53.0380 57.1973 48.00 60.00
Total 40 53.4000 5.25162 .83035 51.7205 55.0795 40.00 60.00

ANOVA
SumScore_ Attitude
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between
230.191 2 115.095 5.037 .012
Groups
Within Groups 845.409 37 22.849
Total 1075.600 39

HO : There is no significant difference in neighbourhood composition of race towards attitude in blood donation
Result : Reject HO. There is significant difference in neighbourhood composition of race towards attitude in blood donation.

6
 Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: SumScore_Attitude
Tukey HSD

Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval

(I) D_6KomposisiKaum (J) D_6KomposisiKaum (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Melayu majoriti Cina Majoriti 6.04444* 2.41644 .044 .1448 11.9441

Campuran -1.67320 1.61661 .560 -5.6201 2.2737

Cina Majoriti Melayu majoriti -6.04444* 2.41644 .044 -11.9441 -.1448
Campuran -7.71765* 2.43184 .008 -13.6549 -1.7804
Campuran Melayu majoriti 1.67320 1.61661 .560 -2.2737 5.6201

Cina Majoriti 7.71765* 2.43184 .008 1.7804 13.6549

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

From the one-way analysis of the variance (ANOVA) test, it shows that there is significant difference in attitude towards blood donation between three groups
of neighbourhood composition of races among respondents. Subjects were divided into three groups according to their race (Group 1: Malay, Group 2:
Chinese and Group 3: Mixed). Result shows that there is a significant difference at the p<.05 level in attitude towards blood donation activity scores for the
three groups [F(2, 37)=5.037, p=.012]. Post-hoc comparisons using the Tukey HSD test indicated that the mean score for Group 1 (M=53.444, SD=5.261) was
significantly different from Group 2(M=47.400, SD=5.320). As for Group 2 (M=47.400, SD=5.320), the score in attitude was significantly different from Group
1(M=53.444, SD=5.261) and Group 3 (M=55.118, SD=4.045)

7
CHAPTER 14:CORRELATION

Descriptive Statistics
Std.
Mean Deviation N
SumScore_SocialAwar
35.1500 3.87993 40
eness
SumScore_Intention 11.5500 2.55152 40

Correlations
SumScore_I
ntention
SumScore_SocialAwar Pearson
.440**
eness Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .005
N 40
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

HO: There is no significant correlation between social awareness and intention to donate blood.
Result: Reject HO. There is significant correlation between social awareness and intention to donate blood.
From the Pearson’s Correlation, the result showed that there was a significant correlation between social awareness and intention to donate blood
[r=.440, n=40, p<.005]. In other words, the result indicates that high score of attitude towards blood donation is associated with stronger intention
to donate blood among the blood donors in this study.