Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Please note:
2. To assure that ratings are fair, every plane is being compared to the planes of the
same era and same category (long/short-hauled planes). There will be five evaluating
methods, namely capacity, range, fuel efficiency, speed, and deprication per
passenger. New planes are not necessarily ranked better than old planes, as they are
being compared to planes of the same time. (Although new planes generally have a
better chance of surpassing the average of the same category)
4. SMS is considered by some more reliable than OMS, but generally it is harder to
get a score in OMS than in SMS
Finally, i finished the last turn of this experiment with lowered fuel expense, increased passenger income (The upgraded aircraft can do 1 more flight), and that the sub-business increased for 8.42%! (For just one more flight!)
-2.19
[[File:2.16.jpg|thumb|220px|2.17]]
[[File:2.17.jpg|thumb|220px|2.18]]
[[File:2.18|thumb|220x220px|2.19
]]
<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
#ERROR!
#ERROR!
'See also: ''[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1--n9U06aLQZ5j81C0pDMXTOuSaZAorpO47uE4nisc1g/edit?ts=568327e1#gid=0 Experiment 1]
#ERROR!
#ERROR!
Average Profit made in 12 consecutive months / Cost of Aircraft / Depreciation / Expense
<br />
#ERROR!
Aérospatiale-BAC [[Concorde]] is a turbojet-powered supersonic passenger jet airliner that was operated until 2003. It featured a maximum speed over twice the speed of sound at Mach 2.04 (1,354 mph or 2,180 km/h at cruise altitude), with seating
I mention these only because the aircraft is regarded by many as an aviation icon and an engineering marvel, and that over time the aircraft became profitable when it found a customer base willing to pay for flights on what was for most of its career
''''<s>I know what you're saying, okay. Let's get back to our tracks.</s>'''''
#ERROR!
Small regional aircrafts are usually great for opening routes that are easy to keep as a monopoly and/or from a large city to little cities with a tourism around 120-180 and low business ratings.
Some find that places like the [[Canary Islands]], [[Key West]], the Eastern European cities, the little Indonesian cities around [[Kuala Lumpur]], and [[Singapore]], the small-but-well-rated Korean cities, some of the Appalachian cities in the US, outlie
When your passengers have no choice, satisfaction ''may'' not affect the occupancy a lot.
You can usually pick up one of these planes with little money after buying big birds for your main routes.
Also, the reciprocation rate of these small planes are rather high when compared with other big planes:
Your concorde can make an '''''<u>average</u>''''' of 15,000K every month and throughout 20 years. The cost of buying one concorde is 399,000K.
While your CRJ can make 1,800K every month. The cost of it is 24,000K.
That is about 3.759% of its value. At the same time, 0.0041% of its value vanish every month due to deprecation. (That is about 1635.9 K per month)
While your CRJ-200 can make 1800K per month; That is 7.5% of its value and whereas every month you just lose 98K due to depreciation.
Therefore it is advisable that long range and routes with huge demands to be operated by large planes and small routes to be operated by small planes.
Did I also say if the concorde isn't being operated in major routes between cities with 300 tourism and 200 business ratings, it is hard to make the price tag in 1.3 and getting 100% occupancy? Any competition can easily destroy your concorde route
#ERROR!
* Long-ranged Concorde routes give more profit. A Concorde route at price tag 1.6 between a range of 973 km (Atlanta-Miami) earns less than that of a concorde operated at a range of 3522 km (London-Cairo) given that their occupancy is 100%. I
<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
*
#ERROR!
So yesterday ''(12/1/2016)'' I occasionally found out that '''''the occupancy of Economy-class' in a route is related to the price of that of Business-class' and vice-versa'''''.
Basically the world traveller index was ~3500 at the first part of my experiment. I am using a 737-100 in a route between Luxembourg and Abu Dhabi.
The original price tag for both classes are 1.6 until i find business-class isn't full so i lowered the business-class price tag to 1.0
Soon enough, next turn the World Traveller Index rose by 40 something. To my surprise, some passengers have switched from Economy to Business and that the occupancy for economy becomes 98% while vice-versa for Business. I concluded th
#ERROR!
http://air-tycoon-online.wikia.com/wiki/Tutorial/How_to_play#comm-6865
http://air-tycoon-online.wikia.com/wiki/Free_Talk_Forum#comm-8381
By Category (6000km+ range= Large Plane)
Average / By 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s 2020s Overall Conclusion *1:"Good" is decipted as "above average"
Small | Large
Although there is no direct evidence showing that the capacity of planes increase continously and at a same rate in between every decade, the trend of planes' capacities is a constant increase to the end of the game; while short-rangers generally have less
Capacity 135.96 218.4285714 231.5490196 223.6603774 235.1463415 241.3148148 264.975 125.7457627 337.4 217.75 *2: When Compared To Planes of the Same Era and Same Category (See J1)
capacities than long-rangers do.
Generally Speaking, planes' range increase by every decade. However, the number of short-ranged aircraft : long ranged aircraft throughout the game is almost the same, with a 1:1 ratio. Calculations are available in cell D130 & D131. The average of range by # Refer to Cover Page {{Important}} Part bullet point 4 & 5, please note that every category is worth one mark in Overall Macroscopic Rating [EXCEPTION:PROFIT/PASSENGER
Range 5143.74 6299.54 6574.51 6895.02 7416.29 7869.87 8673.83 3722.186441 10715.81667 7121.2875
category is much different. IS WORTH 3 MARKS]]
Fuel Efficiency 5.62173913 5.888571429 6.470588235 6.977358491 7.395121951 7.792592593 8.1475 6.857627119 7.325 6.8975 Needless to say, fuel efficiency increases throughout the game. Generally speaking, large and long-ranged aircraft have better fuel efficiency than short-hauled planes, which the latter is mostly populated at the early years. IF(C10>=LARGE(C$10:C$128,5),5,0)+IF(D10>=LARGE(D$10:D$128,10),1,0)+IF(E10>=LARGE(E$10:E$128,10),1,0)+IF(F10>=LARGE(F$10:F$128,10),1,0 *3: If the respective plane is the best among its peers, it will get 2 bonus points: while the remaining top ten will get 1 bonus point.
For Overall Macroscopic Rating, one mark has been awarded to a plane that has scored one mark (above average) in between Ref 1 and Ref 4. If a plane gets 0, it is likely that it is
Speed 0.6847826087 0.7705714286 0.7566666667 0.7577358491 0.7775609756 0.7668518519 0.79225 0.7042372881 0.8096666667 0.7535 The speed of planes do not seem to be affected by their era, while small planes usually travel slower than juggernauts do.
not worth purchasing. Top ten planes in any fields (Capacity, Range , Fuel Efficiency and Speed) will get one additional mark per field. TMSR is on a timely basis.
Deprication/Passenger *4
Charging Price/Passenger Complete! Complete! Complete! Complete! Beta Beta Beta Beta Beta Incomplete Incomplete
Deprication/Ton of
Maximum Range Fuel Cruise Speed Cruise Speed Number of Cargo Ref1 (Score a Mark = Good* Capacity*) [See AO1] Ref2 (score a mark = good range) Mean Macroscopic
Plane Class Price (K) Time Span Deprication (K) Cargo Carried in a Maxium Profit Profit/Tons Ref3 Macroscopic Rating
Capacity (km) Efficiency (mach) (km/h) Carried in a turn
Turn
1960s|1970s|1980s|1990s|2000s|2010s|2020s 1960s|1970s|1980s|1990s|2000s|2010s|2020s Rating (MMS)
Boeing 707-320F Freighter 42 4800 6.3 0.79 967.7737 70,000 1960 1994 279.30 42
Boeing 727-100QF Freighter 27 4040 6.5 0.60 735.018 53,000 1964 1984 211.47 27
Boeing 727-200F Freighter 35 3612 6.7 0.60 735.018 77,000 1970 307.23 35
Boeing 737-200F Freighter 25 2733 6.7 0.74 906.5222 50,000 1972 199.50 25
Boeing 737-300F Freighter 31 3360 7.4 0.74 906.5222 75,000 1984 299.25 31
Boeing 737-700F Freighter 27 5234 8.0 0.77 943.2731 62,000 1997 247.38 27
Boeing 737-900F Freighter 42 3900 8.1 0.77 943.2731 94,000 2001 375.06 42
Boeing 737-7F Freighter 28 4925 9.1 0.78 955.5234 71,000 2019 283.29 28
Boeing 737-9F Freighter 40 4640 9.1 0.78 955.5234 94,000 2019 375.06 40
Boeing 747-100F Freighter 96 5427 6.9 0.84 1029.0252 253,000 1970 1009.47 96
Boeing 747-200F Freighter 110 7300 7.1 0.84 1029.0252 271,000 1972 1081.29 110
Boeing 747-400F Freighter 113 8230 7.8 0.85 1041.2755 309,000 1993 1232.91 113
Boeing 747-8F Freighter 118 8130 8.6 0.86 1053.5258 341,000 2012 1360.59 118
Boeing 757-200F Freighter 42 5834 7.4 0.70 857.521 99,000 1984 395.01 42
Boeing 757-300F Freighter 50 5000 8.0 0.70 857.521 134,000 1999 534.66 50
Boeing 767-300F Freighter 54 6025 7.6 0.80 980.024 175,000 1988 698.25 54
Boeing 777-F Freighter 102 9070 8.1 0.84 1029.0252 290,000 2009 1157.10 102
Boeing 787-3F Freighter 56 4750 8.4 0.84 1029.0252 150,000 2013 598.50 56
Airbus A300-600F Freighter 64 4850 7.2 0.78 955.5234 169,000 1985 674.31 64
Airbus A300-600ST Freighter 64 5050 7.3 0.80 980.024 190,000 1995 758.10 64
Airbus A310-200F Freighter 42 5550 7.2 0.80 980.024 110,000 1983 438.90 42
Airbus A310-300F Freighter 42 7330 7.4 0.80 980.024 120,000 1987 478.80 42
Airbus A330-200F Freighter 70 7400 8.4 0.82 1004.5246 192,000 2009 766.08 70
Airbus A350-900F Freighter 78 9250 9.1 0.85 1041.2755 259,000 2014 1033.41 78
Airbus A380F Freighter 140 10400 8.8 0.89 1090.2767 382,000 2008 1524.18 140
DC-8-70F Freighter 35 5820 7.0 0.73 894.2719 96,000 1977 383.04 35
DC-9-32F Freighter 17 2475 6.2 0.65 796.2695 39,000 1967 155.61 17
DC-10-30F Freighter 69 7435 6.3 0.82 1004.5246 160,000 1971 638.40 69
MD-11-11F Freighter 71 7320 7.2 0.82 1004.5246 201,000 1990 801.99 71
Antonov AN-24 Freighter 10 2761 4.3 0.37 453.2611 20,000 1962 79.80 10
Antonov AN-70 Freighter 34 5000 5.8 0.61 747.2683 71,000 1994 283.29 34
Antonov AN-225 Freighter 230 4000 5.9 0.65 796.2695 420,000 1989 1675.80 230
Ilyushin il-76 Freighter 40 4300 5.2 0.65 796.2695 125,000 1974 498.75 40
Ilyushin il-96T Freighter 71 5000 6.4 0.78 955.5234 184,000 1998 734.16 71
Tupolev Tu-204-100C Freighter 27 3300 5.9 0.73 894.2719 52,000 1990 207.48 27
Average 61.2 5550.03 7.24 0.75 923.67 155942.86 622.21
A/C Boeing 707-120 Routes SIN-HKG First Class Seat No Seat
Start date 1961.01 Distance 2594Km 1611Mi Business Class Seat
12 Seats 55"
End date 1963.01 Schedule 15/Week Economy Class Seat
120 Seats 33"
Duration 24 Months (2 Years) Upgraded No Total Seats 132 Seats
Speed 992.2743 km/h
Leasing
Example Maximum Capacity Range (km) Fuel Efficiency Cruise Speed (mach) Price (K) TIme Span Deprication (K)
B707-120 179 5200 6.2 0.81 69000 1960 1994 275.31