1. Advisory Opinion on the Use of Nuclear Weapon 1996 8.
Russian Socialist Federated Social republic vs Cibrario
There is no source of law, customary or treaty, that explicitly prohibits the possession or even use of nuclear weapons. The only 9. Banco Nacional de Cuba vs Sabatino requirement being that their use must be in conformity with the law on self-defence and principles of international humanitarian law.[ 10. Oetjen vs Central Leather Co. A threat or use of force by means of nuclear weapons that is contrary to Article 2, paragraph 4, of the United Nations Charter and 11. Yao vs Commission on Immigration that fails to meet all the requirements of Article 51, is unlawful" "A threat or use of nuclear weapons should also be compatible with 12. US (Alexander Tellech) vs Austria and Hungary the requirements of the international law applicable in armed conflict, particularly those of the principles and rules of humanitarian 13. The Canevaro Case law, as well as with specific obligations under treaties and other undertakings which expressly deal with nuclear weapons" 14. The Nottebohm Case "the threat or use of nuclear weapons would generally be contrary to the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict, and in particular the principles and rules of humanitarian law; However, in 15. Chattin Case view of the current state of international law, and of the elements of fact at its disposal, the Court cannot conclude definitively whether 16. US (Noyes) vs Panama the threat or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful or unlawful in an extreme circumstance of self-defence, in which the very survival 17. North American Dredging Co. vs Mexico of a State would be at stake] "There exists an obligation to pursue in good faith and bring to a 18. Harvey vs Santiago conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international control 19. US vs Rauscher 2. Reparation Case (ICJ Advisory Opinion 1949) 20. Secretary of Justice vs Lantion 3. International Catholic Migration Commission vs Calleja 4. Kapisanan ng mga Manggagawa vs The International Rice Research Institute 5. DFA vs NLRB 6. WHO vs Aquino 7. Jeffrey Liang vs People