STATE OF MICHIGAN

37TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

STATE OF MICHIGAN Case numbers: T003166W / T003167W

CITY OF WARREN,

BUILDING AND ZONING DIVISION DATE: 10/12/2010

(EVERETT MURPHY)

Plaintiff,

VS. MOTION FOR RELIEF AND STAY OF

ANY COLLECTION OF FINES OR

JEFFERY DEAN SAXON,
PENALTIES PENDING APPEAL

(an obvious fictional person of the State created

by the STATE and not real party of interest

“Jeffery-Dean: Saxon”)

Trustee – Sui Juris

Defendant in error,

MOTION FOR RELIEF AND STAY OF ANY COLLECTION OF FINES

OR PENALTIES PENDING APPEAL

Pursuant to Melo v. US, 505 F2d 1026, United States Constitution 8th Amendment and

Michigan State Constitution Article I § 16, 17, US 18 § 241, 242, et al.

Page 1 of 6
 Comes now, Defendant in error, Jeffery-Dean: Saxon, a sovereign free white man over 21

years old, who has the rights to which all free men are entitled, who is not under the power of

another, such as the implied jurisdiction of any Corporation or Government to move the court to

stay all fines or penalties in this matter and seeks relief of the same. I have the right to make

valid, or not, any contract, by my actions. In short, I am Sovereign. I live in honor and now

state for the record in affidavit form before this court.

JURISDICTION

It has been and remains the position of the defense that this court surrendered jurisdiction

through due process violations and structural errors. However, in order to seek the intended

relief, this court must hear this Motion, at arm’s length and by special appearance, by the

Defendant. Furthermore, the Defense does not wave, nor has it ever waved these violations or

errors. The Defense stands fast.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

1. The Defendant, Jeffrey Dean: Saxon, appeared before Judge John M. Chmura on

September 29th, 2010.

2. Judge John M. Chmura entered an order for the City imposing a $4000 fine on the

Defendant.

3. The Defendant is currently exhausting due process remedies through the appellate

process.

Page 2 of 6
 4. The Defendant is not financially solvent enough to fulfill the unconstitutional and

excessive fines and penalties that John M. Chmura has ordered.

ARGUMENT

The fines and fees ordered by John M. Chmura on September 19 th, 2010, were both

excessive, by both state and federal constitutional standards, and malicious. The Defendant

challenged subject matter jurisdiction and believed it was his duty to challenge government

officials performing acts of oppression.

In repose, John M. Chmura has ordered excessive fines and penalties, well beyond the

Defendant’s capability ability to pay. This is clearly an act of retribution and not one of justice.

Even if the judge had believed the court had jurisdiction, no refuting argument was placed on the

record, and the court could not proceed. Any order put forth would have been made in error and

must be corrected.

It is also clear the Defendant has no ability to pay the fines ordered. This would clearly

jeopardize the Defendant’s livelihood and his residence. Clearly the court could not, in good

faith, order the Defendant to pay fines that would place his future at risk for the sake of “civil

violations.”

§ 16 Bail; fines; punishments; detention of witnesses.

Sec. 16. Excessive bail shall not be required; excessive fines shall not be imposed; cruel

or unusual punishment shall not be inflicted ; nor shall witnesses be unreasonably

detained.1

1
History: Const. 1963, Art. I, §16, Eff. Jan. 1, 1964.
2
History: Const. 1963, Art. I, §17, Eff. Jan. 1, 1964.

Page 3 of 6
and

§ 17 Self-incrimination; due process of law; fair treatment at investigations.

Sec. 17. No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against

himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law. The

right of all individuals, firms, corporations and voluntary associations to fair and just

treatment in the course of legislative and executive investigations and hearings shall not

be infringed.2

The Defense also raised the issue of how the fines came to be imposed. The citing

official admitted to breaking the law in order to obtain the evidence against the Defendant. This

would clearly disqualify that official from remaining credible. Any fines were exacted to cover

up misdeeds and criminal behaviour on the part of officials. If the Defendant is made to pay

these fines before due process has been exhausted and times for appeal has expired, then a

miscarriage of justice would have been had.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, the Defendants moves this court for relief and to stay collection of any fines or

penalties until the outcome of appeal.

Affiant sayth not, All Rights Reserved, Jeffery-Dean: Saxon, “Sovereign”, “One of the People”

Jeffery-Dean: Saxon reserves the right to amend this petition at any time.

Page 4 of 6
_____________________________

Jeffery-Dean: Saxon c/o

JEFFERY DEAN SAXON
ADDRESS
Warren Michigan [48089]
PHONE
Accused in Pro Per
At Arms Length
Restricted jurisdiction
By special visitation - “ special appearance”
To challenge jurisdiction of the Court

VERIFICATION

The foregoing statements are true, correct and complete to the best of my belief.

Dated 24th day of September 2010

___________________________________

Jeffery-Dean: Saxon – Trustee for:

JEFFERY DEAN SAXON©

FURTHER AFFIANT SAITH NOT.

Principal, by Special Appearance, a living breathing, flesh and blood man, proceeding Sui Juris.

Subscribed and sworn, without prejudice.

My Hand and Mark as Subscriber

Date: _____________________ Common Law Seal: __________________________________

Page 5 of 6
Michigan State Republic )

) Jurat
Macomb County )

On the ______ day of ____________, 20_____, Jeffery-Dean, family of Saxon personally

appeared before me and proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person

whose name is subscribed hereto and acknowledged to me that he executed the same under

asservation, and accepts the facts thereof. Subscribed and affirmed before me this day. Witness

my hand and seal this ______ day of __________________, 20_____,

_______________________________________________________

Notary Signature

My commission expires:

_______________________________________________________

Page 6 of 6