1.

PIL :-MISS VEENA VS BIHAR AIR1983SC339

PLIGHT PRISINOERS.
2. SHEELA BARSE VS MAHRASTRA AIR1986SC378
CUSTODIAL VIOLENCE OF WOMEN LOCKUP
3. SP GUPTA VS UOI AIR 1982 SC 149
4. MUKESH ADVANI VS MP AIR 1985 SC1368
BONDED LABOUR TO TAMIL
5. NANDAN PASWAN VS BIHAR AIR 1987 SC877
CORRUPTION AGAINST SOCIETY.
6. BANDHUA MUKTI VS UOI 1984 SC802
HARYANA BONDED LABOUR
MUMBAI KAMAGAR SABHA V.ABDUL THAI 1976

1. 1.JUD PROC:- MANEKA GANDHI’S CASE AIR 1978 SC 598

2. 2. IN OLGA TELLIS V. BOMBAY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION19852 SUPP SCR 51
3. PAVEMENT DWELLER
4. 3. BANDHUA MUKTI MORCHA V. UNION OF INDIAA.I.R. 1984 S.C. 802.
5. 4.RUDAL SHAH V. STATE OF BIHARAIR 1983 SC 1086.
ILLEGAL DETENTION FOR 14
6. 5. HUSSAINARA KHATOON V. STATE OF BIHARA.I.R. 1979 S.C. 1377.
7. 6.IN D.K.BASU V. STATE OF W.B.AIR 1997 SC 610
8. 7.VISHAKA V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN.AIR 1997 SC 3011
141/14/225/256/356/365

TECHNIQUECREATIVITY:
-
1)Judgment by going out of box for integrity of nation i.e. Ayodhya
case
2) Epistolary jurisdiction
3) Compensatory jurisdiction
4) Relaxation of rule of locus-standi
5) Public interest litigation or socio-action litigation.
6) Expansion of scope of article 21.
7) A letter treated as P.I.L
8) Order against the executive to enforce the fundamental rights.
9) Taking a step as legislator.
10) Environment protection with reference to compensation and
polluter pay principle, etc…
11) Rule of absolute liability and strict liability.
12) Writ jurisdiction
13) Issue of guidelines in the field where law is not enacted or the
existing law is unable to provide remedy.

TOOLS :-
Under Article 32. Anybody can move to Supreme Court for redress
against the violation of the fundamental rights.
2. Under Article 226 Anybody can move to High court for redress
against the violation of the fundamental rights as well as other legal
rights.
3. Under Article 227, 141, 142, 136 of the Constitution.
4. Section 134, 144 and 482 of Cr.P.C.
5. Section 151 of C.P.C.

REVIEW 13:-
Act 13, 32, 131-136,
143, 226, 145, 246, 251, 254 and 372.Article 372 (1)
251&254 DISPT B/W ST AND UNN, ST LAW VLT.
1. Shankari Prasad vs. Union of India (1951)
Ist challenged rt property
2. Sajan Singh’s case (1964),
17th challnegd 31 (A).
3. GolakNath vs. The state of Punjab (1967)
1/17/4 challnegd.
4. KeshavanandaBharathi v. State of Kerala’1973
5.A.K. GopalanVs. Stateof Madras. 1951

Cases on judicial Activism.

1. NilabatiBehras case – In which compensation of Rs. 150000 / -has given
to themother of victim of custodial violence’s.
2. Maneka Gandhi’s case – In which right to abroad is considered as right to
life & liberty.
3. Various decisions given in MC Mehta’s Writ Petition concerning the
pollution of air & water under the purview of right to life u/art 21 of
constitution.
4. Right to speedy trial is recognized in HussainaraKhatoonVs. Chief
secretary of Bihar’s case.
5. SheelaBorseVs. State of Maharashtra & D.K .Basu Vs. State of West
Bengal in which prisoner’s right to consult & appoint legal practitioner of
his choice & right to free legal aid is recognized.
6. In Sakal Paper case &BannetColleman case right to freedom is
recognized as right to freedom of speech & expression.

SOCIAL ORDER
1.Indra Sawhney v. Union of India”, AIR 1993 SUPREME COURT 477,
Stsc social justice.
2. “Lily Thomas v. Union of India”, AIR 2000 S C
1650,BIGMY CONVESON ISLAM
5.Paniben v. State of Gujarat”, AIR 1992 S C 1817,
SYMPATHY NOT SHOW ACCSD
6.Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India”, AIR 1984 S C 802,
7.“Lata Singh v. State of U. P.”, AIR 2006 SC 2522,
8.Gaurav Jain v. U.O.I. AIR 1997 SC 3021
REHABILATION OF POSTITUTUTE CHILD
9.“Raja Lal Singh v. State of Jharkhand”,
DORY/304B
10.AIR India v. Nargesh Meerza, AIR 1981 SC 1829,
AIR India Service Regulation 46 (i) (c) UNCONST
11.Vishaka v. State of Rajsthan (AIR 1997 SC 3011)
12Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano, AIR 1985 SC 945, the Apex Court
IGNOR PERSN LAW