Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PII: S0958-6946(18)30060-8
DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2018.03.003
Reference: INDA 4288
Please cite this article as: Gille, D., Walther, B., Badertscher, R., Bosshart, A., Brügger, C., Brühlhart,
M., Gauch, R., Noth, P., Vergères, G., Egger, L., Detection of lactose in products with low lactose
content, International Dairy Journal (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2018.03.003.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 Detection of lactose in products with low lactose content
PT
6 Doreen Gillea,b, Barbara Waltherb, René Badertscherb, Andreas Bosshartb, Cédric Brüggerb,
7 Maria Brühlhartb, Roland Gauchb, Priska Nothb, Guy Vergèresb, Lotti Eggerb*
RI
8
SC
10
11
a
U
Institute for Epidemiology, Biostatistics und Prevention, Hirschengraben 84, 8001 Zurich,
AN
Switzerland
b
Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research EAER, Agroscope,
M
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
12 _________________________________________________________________________
13 ABSTRACT
14
16 hindered by high levels of glucose and galactose that are present after lactase treatment.
PT
17 The enzymatic method presented here includes an enzymatic glucose depletion step and
18 enables sensitive analysis of low levels of lactose at a detection limit of 25 mg kg-1, with
RI
19 repeatability of 57 mg kg-1 and a recovery rate of 94%. This method was used to measure
20 lactose levels in different cheese types and residual levels of lactose in lactose-free products.
SC
21 Lactose concentrations were below the detection limit in all ripened cheeses, below 0.1% in
22 lactose-free products, and highly variable in fresh cheeses and other products.
23
U
__________________________________________________________________________
AN
24
25
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
26 1. Introduction
27
29 macro- and micronutrient composition, including high-quality proteins and high calcium
30 content. As a result, adults’ recommended daily intake of dairy products is 1–3 portions in
PT
31 most European countries (FAO, 2016). However, lactose, the main carbohydrate present in
32 dairy products, recently gained interest because the demand for lactose-free products by
RI
33 people with lactase intolerance and reduced lactose metabolism is increasing.
34 The lactose molecule comprises two monosaccharides, glucose and galactose, linked
SC
35 via a β-1,4 glycosidic bond that, in humans, can only be cleaved by lactase (β-
37
U
where it is metabolised by the gut microbiome. This fermentation process causes the
AN
38 formation of gaseous metabolites such as hydrogen or methane, which may lead to
41 Today, many different lactose-free dairy products are generated by lactase treatment
TE
42 technology, resulting in lactose concentrations below 0.1%, and are suitable for people
44 successful hydrolysis process, the level of residual lactose needs to be analysed regularly.
45 However, quantification of low levels of lactose in these products is often hindered by the
C
47 Most cheeses are naturally lactose-free or contain very low levels of lactose because,
48 during fermentation by starter bacteria, the lactose is transformed to lactic acid in the initial
49 stages of cheese ripening (McSweeney, 2004). However, in many cases, people with lactose
50 malabsorption are reluctant to eat cheeses because the lactose levels of those products are
52 To overcome these issues, the main objectives of this study are to develop a
53 sensitive and precise method for quantification of low levels of lactose in dairy products and
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
54 to apply this method to a variety of dairy products to generate an up-to-date survey of lactose
55 in dairy products.
56
58
PT
59 2.1. Selection of dairy products
60
RI
61 In total, 121 dairy products were selected from the market. Lactose was quantified in
62 all products and, depending on the amount, different methods were applied. All chemicals
SC
63 were purchased from Grogg (Stettlen, Bern, Switzerland) if not otherwise specified.
64
68 shaking water bath for 20 min. They were clarified with Carrez solutions (Carrez I: 1.25 mL
D
69 85 mmol L-1 potassium hexacyanoferrate(II) trihydrate; Carrez II: 1.25 mL 250 mmol L-1 zinc
TE
70 sulphate heptahydrate; Carrez III, 1.25 mL 0.2 mol L-1 NaOH) and diluted according to
71 product type: 1:100 for yoghurt, milk, curd cheese, and cream and 1:10 for hard-, semi-hard,
EP
72 and soft cheeses, butter, and cottage cheese. Samples were cooled at 2 °C for 20 min,
73 filtered through a Whatman filter (S&S 5892), and kept at −20 °C prior to analysis.
C
74
AC
76
77 Depending on the lactose concentration and whether the product was liquid or solid,
79
80 2.3.1. Sensitive analysis of lactose in dairy products with lactose levels < 0.2 g 100 g-1
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
81 Free glucose was oxidised with glucose oxidase in the presence of catalase (Fig. 1a)
85 which was measured at 340 nm (Fig. 1b). The final dilution of samples in H2O was 1:2 for
PT
86 liquid samples; 1:5 for yoghurt, curd cheese, and butter; and 1:10 for cheeses.
RI
88 followed by two more additions of 10 mL H2O and subsequent homogenisation (15,000 rpm
89 for 60 s). Samples were then incubated in a shaking water bath at 70 °C for 20 min. For
SC
90 glucose oxidation in samples with a high concentration of glucose from lactase treatment, the
91 samples were mixed with glucose oxidase (≥ 4,200 U mL-1, Sigma, Buchs, Switzerland),
92
U
0.5% perhydrol (Merck, Buchs, Switzerland), NaOH (0.02 mol L-1), and catalase (300 U,
AN
93 Sigma). Samples were incubated at 37°C overnight, filtered through Amicon ultra units (30
94
95 galactosidase (1,500 U mL-1) was mixed with hydrolysis buffer (66 mmol L-1 phosphate
D
96 buffer, pH 6.5, containing 1 mmol L-1 Mg2+), added to 0.2 mL of a sample, and incubated in a
TE
99 mixed with 0.5 mL tri-ethanolamine-HCl buffer (0.754 mol L-1 tri-ethanolamine-HCl, pH 7.6,
100 containing 10.14 mmol L-1 Mg2+), 0.05 mL 82.6 mmol L-1 ATP (Roche, Basel, Switzerland),
C
101 and 0.05 mL 10 mg mL-1 NADP (Roche). Then, it was incubated at room temperature (RT)
AC
102 for 6 min before absorption A1 (340 nm) was measured. Next, 10 µL 3 mg mL-1
103 hexokinase/glucose-6-phosphate (Roche) solution was added to the sample and the mixture
104 was incubated for 12 min prior to measurement of absorption A2 (340 nm). Free glucose was
106 glucose was expected to be present in the cheese samples, the oxidation step was omitted.
107
108 2.3.2. Analysis of lactose in solid products with lactose levels > 0.2 g 100 g-1
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
109 For solid samples, lactose was analysed with a less sensitive enzymatic method (limit
110 of quantification, LOQ, = 0.03 g 100g-1 and repeatability, r, = 0.033 g 100g-1). Samples were
111 incubated with β-galactosidase (15 U mL-1) in hydrolysis buffer (66.6 mmol L-1 phosphate
112 buffer, pH 6.5, containing 1 mmol L-1 MgSO4) at RT for 30 min, followed by glucose oxidation
113 to gluconate and H2O2 by glucose oxidase in GOD-Perid solution {6,900 U L-1 glucose
PT
114 oxidase, 0.9 g L-1 2.2’-azino-di-[3ethyl-benzthiazolin-sulphonic acid-(6)]-diammonium salt
115 (ABTS), 500 U L-1 peroxidase in phosphate buffer, pH 7.0}. H2O2 reacted stoichiometrically
RI
116 with the ABTS chromogen, producing ABTSox and H2O. ABTSox absorption was measured at
117 610 nm after incubation at RT for 60 min in the dark. Lactose concentration was calculated
SC
118 by using a glucose standard and multiplying the glucose results by 2. Free glucose was
U
119
120
AN
121 2.3.3. Analysis of lactose in liquid dairy products with lactose levels > 0.2 g 100 g-1
M
122 In liquid samples, analysis was performed with a Microlab EFA pH differential
123 instrument using the method provided by the manufacturer (Glucose/Lactose Kit MEA678,
D
124 BioControl, Endotell, Basel, Switzerland), with a detection limit of 0.5 g 100g-1 and a
TE
126
EP
128
C
129 The number (N) of individual samples analysed for each dairy product is indicated in
AC
130 Table 1. Samples were analysed in duplicate. Standard deviations (SDs) were determined
132
134
135 3.1. Development of a method for lactose quantification in lactose-free dairy products
136
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
137 Lactose quantification in dairy products with low levels of lactose requires a sensitive
138 and specific method enabling lactose detection below 0.1%. Enzymatic methods most often
139 measure liberated glucose after hydrolysis with β-galactosidase. Such a method is often
140 unsuitable for lactose-free products because of the high levels of monosaccharides released
141 by lactase during the manufacturing process (Li et al., 2013). This problem was overcome in
PT
142 the present method by removing glucose via oxidation to gluconate with glucose oxidase
143 (Fig. 1a). Subsequently, glucose released after hydrolysis by β-galactose (Fig. 1b) was
RI
144 quantified with high sensitivity, resulting in a detection limit of 0.024 g kg-1. The sensitivity
145 and specificity of the method were investigated in recovery experiments with over 70 different
SC
146 lactose-free dairy products ranging from 0.06 to 0.7 g kg-1 of added lactose. The average
U
147 recovery was 94% across all included products, and all results were within a lower (64%) and
148 upper (125%) limit of 3 * SD (Fig. 2). Moreover, the repeatability of the method was 0.057 g
AN
149 kg-1 based on 45 duplicate measurements of dairy products with lactose values above the
150
151
D
153
154 Lactose was quantified in several different dairy products. The values (g kg-1) were
EP
155 determined by duplicate analysis and SD (Table 1). The most common types of ripened
156 cheese had lactose concentrations below the detection limit of 24 mg kg-1 and can be
C
157 considered naturally lactose-free due to bacterial fermentation processes (Table 1). Only one
AC
158 cheese (Saint-Paulin) had detectable lactose content (0.03 g kg-1), which was still below the
159 level detected in lactose-free products (Table 1). The levels of lactose in fresh cheeses,
160 yogurt, and non-fermented products are presented in Table 1. In parallel, macronutrient
161 concentrations were measured in all products and are summarised in Supplementary
163
164 Conclusion
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
165
166 The newly developed enzymatic method is well suited for detection of low-levels of
167 lactose in different dairy products. Moreover, this survey confirmed that all ripened cheeses
168 are naturally lactose free and the products declared as lactose-free that were included in this
169 study had levels below 0.1%, with one exception having a lactose concentration of 1.4 g kg-1.
PT
170
171 Acknowledgement
RI
172
173 The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of Agroscope Laboratories for
SC
174 the analytical work.
175
176 References
U
AN
177
178 FAO. (2016). Food-based dietary guidelines. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organisation
M
180 Li, Wang, Z., Li, S., Donelan, W., Wang, X., Cui, T., & Tang, D. (2013). Preparation of
TE
183 Lortal, S. (2004). Cheeses made with thermophilic lactic starters. In Y. H. Hui, L. Meunier-
184 Goddik, J. Josephsen, W.-K. Nip & P. S. Stanfield (Eds.), Handbook of food and
C
185 beverage fermentation technology (Vol. 1, pp. 298–299). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC
AC
186 Press.
187 Mattar, R., de Campos Mazo, D. F., & Carrilho, F. J. (2012). Lactose intolerance: diagnosis,
188 genetic, and clinical factors. Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, 5, 113–121.
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
191 Steffen, C. (1975). Enzymatische Bestimmungsmethoden zur Erfassung der
194 Suchy, F. J., Brannon, P. M., Carpenter, T. O., Fernandez, J. R., Gilsanz, V., Gould, J. B., et
195 al. (2010). National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference: lactose
PT
196 intolerance and health. Annals of Internal Medicine, 152, 792–796.
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 Figure legends
3 Fig. 1. Treatment of products with high free glucose content with glucose oxidase and
4 catalase (A) prior to lactose hydrolysis with β-galactosidase (B) after lactase treatment.
PT
6 Fig. 2. Lactose recovery rates of different dairy products with low concentrations of lactose (<
7 800 mg kg-1): , milk, milk powder, lactose free-milk; , diverse dairy products; , yoghurt;
RI
8 , fresh cheeses; , soft cheeses; , semi-hard and hard cheeses. Middle line: average
9 recovery of 94%; upper and lower limits of 3 * SD, 125% and 64% of recovery.
SC
10
U
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 1
PT
Mountain cheese (2) LOD LF Semi skim milk (1.5% fat) (1) 0.25±0.00
LF Drink milk (2.5% fat) (1) 1.41±0.03
Semi-hard cheese LF Coffee cream (15% fat) (2) 0.55±0.03
RI
Appenzeller (2) LOD LF Half cream (25% fat) (2) 0.30±0.11
Vacherin Fribourgeois DOP (2) LOD LF Cream (35% fat) (2) 0.26±0.02
St. Paulin (2) 0.3±0.1 LF Butter (1) 0.01±0.02
SC
Tête de Moine DOP (2) LOD LF Butter, reconstituted (1) LOD
Tilsiter Switzerland-Past (2) LOD
Tilsiter Switzerland red (1) LOD Yoghurt
Tilsiter Switzerland surchoix (1) LOD Yoghurt, low fat (0.1% fat) (2) 33.83±1.65
U
Raclette (2) LOD Yoghurt, semi skim (1.5 fat) (3) 28.97±3.99
Cream cheese (2) LOD Yoghurt, whole milk (3.5% fat) (3) 33.10±4.60
AN
Yoghurt Greek style (10% fat) (3) 30.27±3.74
Soft cheese Bifidus yoghurt semi skim (1.5% fat) (1) 42.35±0.21
Vacherin Mont-D'Or DOP (2) LOD Bifidus yoghurt (3.5% fat) (2) 32.08±0.46
Limburger (2) LOD
M
Camembert (60% fat) (2) LOD Drink milk (2.5% fat) (5) 48.35±0.21
Camembert (45% fat) (2) LOD Whole milk (3.5% fat) (8) 47.67±0.31
TE
Feta type cheese (Switzerland) (1) LOD Coffee cream (15% fat) (3) 41.25±1.33
Half cream (25% fat) (3) 37.32±0.83
Fresh cheese Cream (35% fat) (3) 33.00±1.51
18.24±5.95 7.50±1.27
EP
a
Abbreviations are: N, number of samples tested; LF, product declared as lactose-free. LOD: value below the limit of
detection of 0.024 g kg-1. Values are the average ± SD.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC