Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ELEMENTARY LEVEL
(1st Semester)
Name of Employee VERVINA T. VILLONES Name of Rater MEDELINA B. BESARIO
Position TEACHER III Position MASTER TEACHER 1
Review Period 1st Semester ( May-October) Date of Review OCTOBER 27, 2017
Bureau/Center/Service/Division San Isidro ES/ Sta. Fe District/ Leyte Division
WEIGHT
ACTUAL
MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS RATING SCORE
RESULT
KRA
KRA 1 I. Teaching 35%
Learning
Process
1. Prepared at least 90 (May- 5% 5 - Prepared 90 and above 5 - submitted before Q-90 Q E T A 0. 250
complete DLP/DLL October) complete and the 1st period of E- -
throughout the rating congruent set of lesson classes T-during 5 - 5 5
1st period
period. plans/DLL 4 - submitted during
4 - Prepared 68-89 the 1st period of
complete and classes
congruent set of lesson 3 - submitted during
plans/ DLL the 2nd period of
3 - Prepared 67 complete classes
and congruent set of 2 - submitted during
lesson plans/DLL the 3rd period of
2 - Prepared 24-45 classes
complete and 1 - submitted during
congruent set of lesson the 4th period of
plans/DLL classes or beyond
1 - Prepared 23 and below within the day
complete set of lesson
plans/DLL
Page 1 of 18
2. Utilized at least 3 (May- 6% (Refer to DepEd Order 5 - Utilized 5 or more Q-
Varied Learning October) No. 42, s. 2016) appropriate IMs Audio, Q E T A
Resources that are 5 - ICT/Multimedia, 4 - Utilized 4 & 0.240
appropriate to the Audio, Visual and appropriate IMs Visual 4 4 - 4
lesson’s objective Printed and 3 - Utilized 3 E- 4
daily. Manipulative appropriate IMs T- -
(ICT/Multimedia, instructional materials 2 - Utilized 2
Visual and Printed were utilized through- appropriate IMs
Materials, out the lessons. 1 - Utilized only 1 IM
Manipulative) 4 - Audio, Visual and
MOV: Printed and
- IMs Checklist manipulative
instructional materials
were utilized through-
out
the lessons.
3 - Visual, Printed and
other Manipulative
instructional materials
were utilized through-
out the lessons.
2 - Printed materials were
utilized throughout the
lessons.
1 - Innovative instructional
materials were not
utilized throughout the
lessons.
5. Taught all
competencies in the 5% 5 - with 90-100% 5 - 95% - 100% and 5 - 90-100% in line Q- 89%
Budget of Lesson per mastery above of the With the LCD E- 85%
Q E T A
quarter in all subject 4 - with 80-89% mastery competencies for 4 - 80-89% in line T- 89%
areas with at least 75% 3 - with 70-79% mastery the quarter were with the LCD 0.200
4 4 4 4
mastery. 2 - with 60-69% mastery taught 3 - 70-79% in line
MOV: 4 - 85-94% with the LCD
Lesson Plan 1 - with 59 and below 2 - 60-69% in line
3 - 75-84%
mastery
LCD (Learning 2 - 65-74% with the LCD
Competency 1 - 59 and below in
1 - 64% and below line with mastery
Directory)/Budget of
Lessons
Curriculum Guide
Teacher’s M&E
Report (SMEA)
Page 4 of 18
6. Constructed/Enhanced (May- 4% 5 - Constructed/enhanced 5 - indexed Q- - Q E T A
40 complete varied October 60 or more IMs/eIMs E- 4 0.120
indexed IMs/e- 4- daily T- - 3 3 3
IMs/Learning 3 - constructed/enhanced 4 - indexed weekly
Resources. 40-49 only IMs/eIMs
(Note: Acknowledge 2 - constructed/enhanced every other
the source of the 30-39 only day
copied materials and 1 - constructed/enhanced 3 - indexed
show the enhanced 29 and below IMs/eIMs
materials) weekly
2 - indexed
IMs/eIMs
monthly
1 - indexed
IMs/eIMs
quarterly
Page 5 of 18
Quarterly Test. SMEA T- - Q E T A
2nd & 3rd
(Note: To be Quarter 4 4 - 4
implemented in SY Result
2017-2018)
Q- above
4. Zero-out non-readers 5 - 0 non-reader 3.0%
(May- 2% (11)
(for grades 1 to 6) October 4 - non-reader is only 0.1- Q E T A
1.0% of E- -
(Based on EGRA/ Phil for T- -
IRI result) Grades 2- the class 1 - - 1
0.020
6 only) 3 - non-reader is only 1.1-
MOV: Phil-IRI Result, 2.0% of
SMEA Report the class
2 - non-reader is only 2.1-
3.0% of
the class
1 - non-reader is above
3.0% of the
class
Q- 3.0%
0f the class
5. Zero-out non – (May- 2% (11)
numerates (based on October) 5 - 0 non-numerates E- - 0.020
the EGMA and other T- -
Page 6 of 18
test) 4 - non-numerates is only Q E T A
0.1-1.0% of the class
MOV: Numeracy Test 3 - non-numerates is only 1 - - 1
Result, SMEA Report 1.1-2.0% of the class
2 - non-numerates is only Q- 3
readers
2.1-3.0% of the class
E- -
1 - non-numerates is above T- -
3.0% of the class
6. Increased number of Q E T A
readers from non- 3% 5 - increased 5 or more
reader to frustration readers from current 3 - - 3 0.090
level; from frustration reading level to the next
to instructional/ higher reading level
independent level in 4 - increased 4 readers from
all classes handled current reading level to
(Note: Non-adviser the next higher reading
will take the reading level
performance of the 3 - increased 3 readers from
classes handled) current reading level to
the next higher reading
MOV: Phil-IRI level
Result, SMEA Result 2 - increased 2 readers from
current reading level to
the next higher reading
level
1 - increased 1 reader from
current reading level to
the next higher
Page 7 of 18
7. Compiled Pupil’s (May- 3% 5 - Compiled complete and 5 - compiled weekly Q- Q E T A
Compiled
Portfolio October) Properly labelled 4 - compiled twice a complete and
0. 150
students' written and month Properly
5 5 - 5
MOV: Pupil’s income generating 3 - compiled monthly labelled
students'
Portfolio product/performance- 2 - compiled quarterly written and
income
based output 1 - compiled semestral generating
4 - Compiled complete product/
3 - Compiled complete
students written
and product/
performance-based
output
2 - Compiled complete
written output with
no performance/product-
based output/not
properly labelled
Page 8 of 18
Summative Test
Question with TOS
SREYA
ECCD
checklist/card
MOV: School
Record Checklist
Page 13 of 18
5. Participated on the 5 - Level 3 of SBM Q-
improvement of SBM (May- practice, Regional Level 2
Q E T A
4% E- -
Level of Practice October) Level 0.120
MOV: 4 - Level 3 of SBM T- - 3 - - 3
SBM Level of Practice practice, Division Level
Result 3 - Level 2 of SBM
practice, Division Level
2 - Level 1 of SBM
practice, Division Level
1 - on process of
collecting and
organizing data
Page 14 of 18
B. Action Research Solved problem in school 1% 5 - Action Research
through Action Research Replicated by other
schools
4 - Implemented the
Action Research with
MOVs
3 - Approved Action
Research by the
SDS/ASDS
2 - Submitted Action
Research Proposal to
be SDS/ASDS
1 - Proposed Action
Research to the
Immediate Supervisor
Page 16 of 18
PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS DISCUSSIONS
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.
Signature Signature
2. For newly hired teachers, they have to fill-in the semesters applicable to their ACTUAL date of service. For example:
a. Teacher A, hired August 6, 2017, IPCRF to be filled-in should be both 1st Semester and 2nd Semester;
b. Teacher B, hired November 8, 2017, IPCRF to be filled-in should be for the 2nd Semester only, therefore, the initial rating for
the 2nd Semester shall become the FINAL rating.
3. This IPCRF ready-to-print and is consisting of 13 pages. YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO MAKE ANY CORRECTIONS/ALTERATIONS/ADDITIONS to the
template. Any comments/suggestions will be treated separately.
Page 18 of 18