Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
If you're looking to score a 100 percentile on the CAT or XAT, then you
shouldn't expect to see too many easy Reading Comp passages. For
the purposes of this thread, I have compiled for your test-taking
pleasure a group of the densest, nastiest passages we could find. If
you can ace these in a reasonable amount of time, it's safe to say that
you have absolutely nothing to fear from Reading Comp questions
come test day.
In reading comp, you are presented with a reading passage (in an area
of business, social science, biological science, or physical science), and
then asked 3 - 6 questions about that text. You are not expected to be
familiar with any topic beforehand—all the information is contained in
the text in front of you. In fact, if you happen to have some previous
knowledge about a given topic, it is important that you not let that
knowledge affect your answers.
Naturally, some passages will be easier than others, though all will
present a challenge. The passages will have a tone and content that
one might expect from a scholarly journal. Expect to see 3 or 4
Reading Comp passages—in areas of business, social science, and
natural science—and a total of about 15 - 25 questions.
Here are the basic things that you need to succeed on Reading
Comprehension:
Notice the questions in the previous paragraph. They may not read
well, but we left them that way for a reason. Those questions illustrate
the kind of thinking you'll need to do as you work through a
passage on Test Day. Once you have the topic and narrowed down its
scope, you have finished step 1. But what then? You still don't have a
firm grasp of the passage.
Like most sophisticated writing, the prose you will see on the CAT
doesn't reveal its secrets so explicitly. Authors always have a purpose,
of course, and always have a structural plan for carrying out that
purpose, though they don't often announce them. That's your job, as
the reader.
Baldly laying out the why and how of a passage up front isn't a
hallmark of CAT Reading Comp passages. And even more important
(as far as the test makers are concerned), if ideas were blatantly laid
out, the test makers couldn't ask probing questions about them. So, in
order to set up the questions—to test how we think about the prose
we read—the CAT uses passages in which authors hide or disguise
their statement of purpose and challenge us to extract it. If you came
across the following first sentence of a typical passage, could you
identify the topic and scope?
The great migration of European intellectuals to the United States in the second
quarter of the 20th century prompted a transmutation in the character of Western
social thought. ...........
That's clear.
Second, what's the scope? (How can we narrow the topic?)
Well, the passage looks as if it will discuss the effects of this migration
on social thought.
So, using what we know about topic and scope, we can easily deduce
why the author is writing.
His purpose, we might say, is "to explore how the arrival of European
thinkers during the period 1926-1950 changed Western social
thought."
And notice the implied structure of what will follow. Don't you expect
the author to first describe the migration westward and then explain
what the "transmutation" was? (And it probably will be in that order;
CAT authors are nothing if not logical.)
The author will never say, "Here's why I write." But unless you figure
out why he is writing, you won't be able to analyze why each piece—
each paragraph and each detail—is there and how it's being used.
3. The idea that the human species could alter something as huge and
complex as the earth’s climate was once the subject of an esoteric
scientific debate.
Topic -
Scope -
Purpose -
7. Warhol was one of the few artists of his time to acknowledge the
capitalist nature of art capitalism.
Topic -
Scope -
Purpose -
8. Perhaps more than any other single experience, the Irish migrations
of the nineteenth century have captured the modern popular
imagination as the most disturbing, indeed by some accounts the most
tragic, chapter in the recent history of human relocations.
Topic -
Scope -
Purpose -
9. Visiting South Korea at the end of 1998 was rather like visiting a
once-proud friend who has suddenly been engulfed by a profound
identity crisis.
Topic -
Scope -
Purpose -
10. The growth of the new nationalism and social and political
‘particularism’ – summarized by Michael Walzer in 1992 as ‘the new
tribalism’ – is one of the most profound ‘crises’ in the familiar sphere
of political culture at the end of the twentieth century.
Topic -
Scope -
Purpose -
17. It was late October, and the lights had been dimmed in the
Beckman conference center at the University of California at Irvine.
The chief technology officer of Total Entertainment Network (TEN), a
gaming company, was demonstrating how a group of players in
cyberspace could match wits in an animated shoot-’em-up called
Quake.
Topic -
Scope -
Purpose -
19. Talk with ever-voluble Sun Microsystems Inc. CEO Scott McNealy,
and you may hear one of his favorite quips: “Conventional wisdom
doesn’t contain a whole lot of wisdom.” He believes it because of his
own experience.
Topic -
Scope -
Purpose -
Author's Voice
All of this accounts for the amazing renewability of coral reefs despite
the endless erosion caused by wave activity.
__________________________________________________
_____________________
Read More
To master understanding on whether an author is speaking in his own
voice or is recounting another persons opinion, read music or book
reviews.
__________________________________________________
_____________________
Consider how different this sentence is from the earlier, more factual
one. The phrase this accounts for should tell you, "that's the author
talking," saying, "I believe this to be proven cause-and-effect." The
same goes for the word amazing. It indicates the author's personal
interpretation. Your response to this sentence should be: "Okay. But,
how so? Where's your evidence?" In other words, as an active reader,
you are demanding support for the author's opinions. You're forcing
the author to defend, his view-to tell you what accounts for the
"amazing renewability of coral reefs."
If you find that you don't personally agree with the author's
viewpoints, keep it to yourself. In this situation, that's irrelevant. The
questions are going to test your command of the author's views, and
you can only get in trouble by imposing your own opinions.