Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
? ?
" ?" ?
?
£
m? he life cycle of the disease begins when an infected female sand fly bites a person.
m? ]emale sand flies must have blood for the development of their eggs, so it is common for
them to seek a human to supply this meal. When the bite occurs, the sand fly injects the
promastigotes, or the infective stage of the Leishmania parasite, into the person.
c
m? hrough binary fission, reproduction starts to take place and the infection spreads.
m? cn the form of the disease that infects internal organs, the parasite then begins infection there
and enters into the circulation system of their host.
m? At this point, if a sand fly chooses the infected human as the source of a blood meal, it will
again ingest the parasite.
m? Within the sand fly's body, the parasite -- now in its promastigote stage again -- will
reproduce. he parasite will stay inside the sand fly for four to 25 days.
m? As the parasite protozoa reproduce within the sand fly, they migrate toward the insect's
pharynx, creating a blockage in its esophagus.
m? When the sand fly gets ready to feed, it cleans out its esophagus -- containing the
promastigotes -- by injecting the leishmaniae into the skin of the person or animal from which
it is preparing to feed.
m? he life cycle of leishmaniasis is now full circle.
m? £ringing the life cycle to an end through treatment depends upon what form of the disease has
occurred. ]or the disease that infects the skin, topical paromycin is often used.
m? cf the lesions caused by the disease are more invasive, sodium stibogluconate, meglumine
antimoniate or pentamidine may be prescribed. cn the form of the disease known as mucosal,
pentavalent antimony is often prescribed over a four-week course. ]or the leishmaniasis
disease that infects organs, pentavalent antimony compound is the most common treatment
protocol.
a
c
m? Serum from many animal species displays potent lytic activity against Leishmania
promastigotes, due to complement activation by the alternate pathyway.
m? ct may therefore be speculated that survival of the parasite within animal hosts depends
on its capacity to become intracellular.
m? cnterestingly, no specific organelle that might facilitate cell invasion has been detected at
the ultra structural level, and leishmanias appear to rely entirely on the phagocytic
activity of macrophages to reach a safe intracellular location.
m? Attachment to the macrophage membrane is prerequisite to phagocytosis.
c
a
Ô
m? ransformation from the promastigote (insect-adapted to the amastigote (mammal-
adapted developmental stage and adaptation to the intracellular life entail major
metabolic changes.
m? he respiration rate and glucose catabolism are strongly decreased in amastigotes
compared to promastigotes, correlating with lower activity of several glycolytic enzymes.
m? Concomitantly, nonesterified fatty acids becomes a predominant energy sources.
m? he biochemical mechanisms that induce such modifications remain speculative.
m? A causal relationship between HSa synthesis and the ac-quisition by the parasite of the
morphological and metabolic characteristics of the intracellular life remains, however, to
be established.
m? A critical question is whether the nature of the ligqand-receptor interaction that precedes
phagocytosis has a role in the successful infection of macrophages.
m? cnfectivity of cultured pro-mastigotes is strongly dependent on the growth phase in vitro
(logarithmic vs. stationary of the microorganism, and it correlates with the increased
expression of a surface glycoprotein presumed to be gp 63 and of a high molecular-
weight glycolipd structurally re-lated to La .
m? ct is noteworthy that, in addition to its postu-lated capacity to dampen macrophage
respiratory burst, La also appears to function as an acceptor of C3 cleaveage products.
m? Ôacrophages are involved in both the inductive and the effectors phases the immune
response.
m? Similarly, -cell mitogenic stimulation and interleukin-2 production by spleen cells from
L. major-infected susceptible mice are de-pressed by macrophage-mediated mechanism,
perhaps as a result of excessive prostaglandin synthesis.
m? Seclusion of parasites within phagolysosomes raises the question of the mechanisms of
presentation of parasite antigens by host macrophages to the immune systems.
m? aarasite constituents appear to be both released from infected macrophages and
displayed on the macrophages surface.
m? Ôembrane-bound " antigen has also been demonstrated on infected
macrophages in vitro.
m? Human and murine macrophages can be activated to kill " parasites in vitro by
exposure to lym-phokin-rech preparations.
m? Such as supernatant fluids from mitogen- or antigen-stimulated lymphoid cell cultures.
m? he c]-Ȗ mediated mechanism of macrophage activation is presumably critical to the
process of recovery from infection.
m? cn mice, depending on the genetic constitution of the host, infection by "
parasites leads to a self-resolving disease or to a progressive disease.
m? ct has been suggested that -cell (CD4+ subsets produced in each instance are different.
Ô
"
m? Earlier studies of the infection of mice from different strains by L. donovani suggested
that initial host susceptibility (or lack of it to the parasite is controlled by a single gene,
termed " of which two alleles exist (" in ³acutely resistant´ animals, " in
susceptible ones. ct was further demonstrated that Lsh gene exercisedits activity through
macrophages.
m? A particularly interesting question is what features of the" -parasite interaction
have a decisive role in determining the overall susceptibility of the host to infection.
m? Ôore precisely, what are the mechanisms controlled by the " gene that render
macrophages permissive or not to the parasite.
m? iven the wealth of knowledge accumulated in recent years in the field of macrophage-
parasite interaction.