Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Facts: Respondents filed a complaint before the RTC against several government agencies,
among them the petitioners, for the cleanup, rehabilitation, and protection of the Manila Bay.
The complaint alleged that the water quality of the Manila Bay had fallen way below the
allowable standards set by law, specifically PD 1152. Respondents, as plaintiffs, prayed that
petitioners be ordered to clean the Manila Bay and submit to the RTC a concerted concrete plan
of action for the purpose.
Petitioners, before the CA, argued that PD 1152 relates only to the cleaning of specific pollution
incidents and do not cover cleaning in general. Apart from raising concerns about the lack of
funds, petitioners also asserted that the cleaning of the Manila Bay is not a ministerial act, which
can be compelled by mandamus.
The CA denied petitioners’ appeal and affirmed the Decision of the RTC in toto. Hence, this
petition.
Issue:Whether or not petitioners may be compelled by mandamus to clean up and rehabilitate the
Manila Bay?
The MMDA’s duty in the area of solid waste disposal is set forth not only in the
Environment Code (PD 1152) and RA 9003, but in its charter as well. This duty of putting up a
proper waste disposal system cannot be characterised as discretionary, for, as earlier stated,
discretion presupposes the power or right given by law to public functionaries to act officially
according to their judgment or conscience.
A perusal of other petitioners’ respective charters would yield to the conclusion that these
government agencies are enjoined, as a matter of statutory obligation, to perform certain
functions relating directly or indirectly to the cleanup, rehabilitation, protection, and preservation
of the Manila Bay. They are precluded from choosing not to perform these duties.