Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) is a common reactor in chemical engineering that had an
impeller or other mixing device to provide efficient mixing. The behavior of a CSTR is ideal and
all the calculations performed with CSTR can be assumed perfect mixing. Perfect mixing means
the output composition is identical to the materials at the inside the reactor. The objective of this
experiment is to study the effect of the temperature on the reaction rate constant and to determine
the activation energy for saponification reaction. The experiment started by mixing the sodium
hydroxide, NaOH and ethyl acetate, Et(Ac) with the equal volume into the reactor at the desired
temperature which is 30 ̊ c. After a certain time, for the mixture react, 50mL of the sample was
collected for the titration process. The volume of the sodium hydroxide used for titration was
recorded. The sample was collected again at the different reaction time. The same procedure was
repeated at the different temperatures which are 40 ̊ c and 50 ̊ c. From the data, plot the graph to
get the value of the reaction rate constant at the different temperatures.
INTRODUCTION
Continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) is a common reactor in chemical engineering that had an
impeller or other mixing device to provide efficient mixing. The reactants are continuously fed
into the reactor and the products are continuously removed from the reactor. The behavior of a
CSTR is ideal and all the calculations performed with CSTR can be assumed perfect mixing.
Perfect mixing means the output composition is identical to the materials at the inside the
reactor. CSTR is commonly used in the industries because it is easy maintained due to good
temperature controller beside it is cheap to construct as well as has large heat capacity. But, the
conversion of reactant to product per volume of the reactor is small compared to the other flow
reactors. Generally, CSTR that commonly used was jacketed or had coil in order to maintain the
reaction temperature in the reactor. The reaction that occurred in the reactor can be either
exothermic or endothermic. If the reaction is exothermic, the reaction will released the heat in
order to reduce the temperature in the reactor. For this, the coolant stream is required to pass
through the jacket or the coil to remove the extra heat. On the other hand, if the reaction is
endothermic, the reaction will absorb the heat in order rise the temperature in the reactor. For
this, the heating element will be applied in order to gain the extra heat.
In chemical industries, chemical kinetics and reactor design are the most important. The
successes or failed of a chemical plant is affected by the selection of a reaction system that
operates in the safest and most efficient way. If the reaction that occurred in the reactor operated
at the constant temperature, it is called as isothermal reaction.
In adiabatic reactor, there is no interchange of heat occurs between the system and the
surroundings which means, there is no cooling or heating element that will be needed to maintain
the temperature of the system.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the effect of the temperature on reaction rate constant, k and determine the
activation energy of saponification.
THEORY
Continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) is a common reactor in chemical engineering that had
been used in industries. It consists of an impeller or other mixing device to provide efficient
mixing. In other words, the contents are well stirred and uniform throughout. The behavior of a
CSTR is ideal which is modeled as having no spatial variation in concentration, temperature, or
reaction rate throughout the vessel. All the calculations performed with CSTR can be assumed
perfect mixing. Perfect mixing means the output composition is identical to the materials at the
elsewhere inside the reactor.
The general mass balance equation for continuous stirred tank reactor:
𝑉 𝑑𝑁𝐴
FA0 – FA + ∫0 𝑟𝐴 𝑑𝑉 = ~ equation 1
𝑑𝑡
There had some assumptions that have been usually used in the calculation that involves the
continuous stirred reactor.
2. The system in the reactor is well mixed, which means reaction rate, rA is constant.
𝑉 𝑉
∫0 𝑟𝐴 𝑑𝑉 = rA ∫0 𝑑𝑉 = rAV
Substitute the assumptions into the equation 1, and rearrange the equation:
𝐹𝐴0−𝐹𝐴
V= ~ equation 2
−𝑟𝐴
There are many different types of methods for data analysis which were used to identify the
reaction order and reaction rate constant, k. Differential, integral, initial rates, and half lives are
the methods involved in the data analysis. In this experiment, integral method was the chosen
method in data analysis.
-ra = kCa0
-dCa / dt = k
-dCa = k.dt
-( Ca – Ca0 ) = k.t
Ca = -k.t + Ca0
For 1st order reaction:
-ra = kCa1
-dCa / dt = kCa
-dCa / Ca = k.dt
-ra = kCa2
-dCa / dt = kCa2
1 / Ca = k.t + 1 / Ca0
Activation energy, Ea is the minimum amount of energy that is required to activate atoms or
molecules to a condition in which they can undergo chemical transformation or physical
transport. Activation energy can be shown in the Arrhenius Law equation:
k = A * e-Ea/RT
Where;
Ea = activation energy
R = gas constant
1. Conical flasks
2. 50mL burrete
3. 100mL measuring cylinder
4. 0.25M hydrochloric acid
5. 0.1M sodium hydroxide
6. 0.1M ethyl acetate
7. Phenolphthalein
8. Continuous stirred tank reactor (model: BP100)
PROCEDURE
50
temperature 50
y = 0.2312x + 32.59
40
30 y = 0.222x + 32.704 Linear (temperature
20 30)
10 Linear (temperature
40)
0
0 10 20 30 Linear (temperature
50)
time, t (minute)
1.8
reaction rate constant, k (L/mol.min)
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
temperature, c
Sample of calculation
V1 = 3.88mL
V2= 6.12mL
n1= 0.00153mol
n2 = n1 = 0.00153mol
CNaOH = 0.0306mol/L
45
40
y = 0.222x + 32.704
35
30
1 / Ca (L/mol)
25
20
15
10
5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
time, t (min)
Compare equation from the graph with the equation from the theory part
45
40
y = 0.2312x + 32.59
35
30
1 / Ca (L/mol)
25
20
15
10
5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
time, t (min)
Compare equation from the graph with the equation from the theory part
90
80 y = 1.6845x + 38.16
70
60
1/Ca (L/mol)
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
time, t (min)
Compare equation from the graph with the equation from the theory part
k = A * e-Ea/RT
ln k = ln A – Ea / RT
0.5
0
0.00305 0.0031 0.00315 0.0032 0.00325 0.0033 0.00335
ln (k)
-0.5
-1
-1.5
y = -10131x + 31.604
-2
1 / T (K-1)
Ea = (10132 K).R
Ea = 84237.448 J/mol
1.684 𝐸𝑎 1 1
Ln (0.222) = 8.314 [303 − ]
323
Ea = 82436.2378 J/mol
DISCUSSION
There are many different types of methods for data analysis which were used to identify the
reaction order and reaction rate constant, k. Differential, integral, initial rates, and half lives are
the methods involved in the data analysis. In this experiment, integral method was the chosen
method in data analysis. In integral method, the first thing that should be done is to guess the
order of the reaction either it is zeroth, first, or second order reaction. The rate law equation can
be modified by some derivation and integration to get the straight line equation y= mx+c. Then,
by ploting the graph, the one that give the straight line graph is the right order of the reaction.
From the data collected, the one that fitted and can give the straight line graph is the second
order reaction. From the graph1, the slope or gradient of the graph can be represented as the
reaction rate constant. This is because of the rate law equation that was modified as stated in the
theory’s part. From the graph2, it can be shown that as the temperature increases from 30 ̊ c to
50 ̊ c, the value of the reaction rate constant, k also increases from 0.0222L/mol.min to
0.1684L/mol.min. In other words, the value of the reaction rate constant is directly proportional
to the temperature.
Arrhenius equation used in order to determine the activation energy of the saponification
reaction. In order to determine the activation energy, there are two different ways which are by
using the graphical method and by using the Arrhenius equation. In graphical method, Arrhenius
equation can be modified by some derivation to get the straight line equation and by using the
data of rate reaction constant and temperature, the graph6 was plotted. From the graph, the slope
of the graph can be represented as the ratio of activation energy to universal gas constant. With
the universal gas constant is equal to 8.314J/mol.K, the activation energy can be determined. The
other way to determine the activation energy is by using Arrhenius equation. By some derivation
of Arrhenius equation with the data collected from results and calculations, the value of
activation energy can be determined. The value of the activation energy form the graphical
method is 84237.448 J/mol, while the value of the activation energy form the calculation method
is 82436.2378 J/mol. The values of the activation energy has slightly different, this is may be
because of the some error that was occurred during the conducting the experiment.
Actually the value of the reaction rate constant is directly proportional to the temperature.
But, from the graph2, it can be shown that the value of the reaction rate constant at the
temperature 30 ̊ c and 40 ̊ c was approximately similar into each other. This is because of the
error that had been occurred during the experiment conducted. One of the errors that cause the
data was affected is the error that occurred during the titration process. The volume of the
sodium hydroxide used for titration should be recorded as soon as the solution of turned into
light pink color. The results is probability was affected because of the volume of sodium
hydroxide used for titration was recorded slightly late than it should be. Which means, the
volume of sodium hydroxide used for titration was recorded when the sample was turned into the
dark pink color or purple color. Besides, the parallax error is the common error that always
occurred during recorded the data such as taking the reading of the volume of sodium hydroxide
titrated. Parallax error is the error that affected by the perceived shift in an object’s position as it
is viewed from the different angles.
CONCLUSION
From the results and calculation of this experiment, it can be concluded that the reaction was
second order. This is because of the data collected was fitted and it can give the straight line
graph as shown in the graph1. Besides, by referring to the graph2, it can be concluded that the
value of the reaction rate constant is directly proportional to the temperature. It is because, as the
temperature increases, the value of the reaction rate also increases. The values of the activation
energy that was determined from the graphical and calculation method show that the
saponification reaction is endothermic reaction. In overall, the experiment was successfully done
as the objectives of the experiment which are to determine the effect of the temperature on
reaction rate constant, k and determine the activation energy of saponification was cleared.
RECOMMENDATION
To improve this experiment in order to ensure that the better results can be obtained, there are
some recommendations that should be focused:
1. Before conduct the experiment, make sure consultation and discussion with lecturer and
lab assistant has been made to ensure the right procedure and technique will be used.
2. This experiment should be done in 4 or 5 different temperatures in order to get more
accurate results but due to the limited of time, this experiment just conducted only at 3
different temperatures.
3. The apparatus should be clean thoroughly by using deionized water to avoid
contamination in titration process.
4. The person who collected the sample every 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 minutes must be sharp
in order not to early or late to get the sample at the desired time. This is important to get
the accurate data because the value of concentration of the sample changing with time.
5. The color of the mixture of sample and hydrochloric acid that turned into the light pink
color that obtained after the titration must be same for entire experiment to avoid any
variation in results.
6. The conical flasks should be shakes gently in order to ensure that the mixture of sample
was well mixed when conducting titration process.
REFERENCES
1. Fogler, H. (2010). Continuous-Flow Reactors. In Essentials of Chemical Reaction,
Engineering: Mole Balances (p. 4). Prentice Hall.
2. CHE502 Chemical Reaction Engineering I, chapter 3method of analysis.
3. Prof. William H. Green, (2017), Chemical and Biological Reaction Engineering,
continuous stirred tank reactors
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/c
hemical-engineering/10-37-chemical-and-biological-reaction-engineering-spring-
2007/lecture-
notes/lec05_02212007_g.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi9kZzwl8zeAhVD6Y8KHTBnAnAQFjAP
egQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw2ulH4l7dGbsC-ZQp6eUWdz
4. Continuous Stirred Tank Reactors (CSTRs)
http://umich.edu/~elements/asyLearn/bits/cstr/index.htm
5. https://www.chem.purdue.edu/gchelp/howtosolveit/Kinetics/IntegratedRateLaws.html
APPENDIX
Control
panel