Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Source: (Bank, GDP (constant 2010 US$), Retrived 2018) (Bank, Inflation, consumer prices
(annual %), Retrived 2018) (Bank, Real interest rate (%), Reterived 2018) (Bank, Unemployment,
At this point it could be seen that inflation has increased in 2006 and unemployment was going
down with uniformity, it could be further understood that after the year 2005 and before the year
2006 there is a point where GDP change, Inflation and interest rates, all were at equilibrium. In
For this segment, we have selected three years, and these are 2008,2009 and 2010
Source: (Bank, GDP (constant 2010 US$), Retrived 2018) (Bank, Inflation, consumer prices
(annual %), Retrived 2018) (Bank, Real interest rate (%), Reterived 2018) (Bank, Unemployment,
For the Segment of Immediate After GFC; we have taken years 2008, 2009 and 2010, as the impact
of financial crises remained till 2010. It could be observed that real interest rates and GDP met in
2009 thus making an equilibrium, whereas the unemployment was found too high in all the three
segments. Government monetary policy had pushed interest rates to the lowest in all three
segments.
(annual %), Retrived 2018) (Bank, Real interest rate (%), Reterived 2018) (Bank, Unemployment,
The segment of five years after GDP was assumed to be started after 2010. It could be observed
that real interest rate, GDP, and inflation have equilibrium at somewhere between 2011 and 2012.
It could be further seen that at a point in 2013, the unemployment is less than the interest rate.
Graphs For South Korea:
Pre GFC:
Source: (Bank, GDP (constant 2010 US$), Retrived 2018) (Bank, Inflation, consumer prices
(annual %), Retrived 2018) (Bank, Real interest rate (%), Reterived 2018) (Bank, Unemployment,
It could be observed that in pre-GFC the interest rates were on a constant rise and unemployment
was steeply declining, the inflation was also falling except in 2007 where it rose me the little bit.
I could be expected that all variables were running towards a long-term equilibrium.
(annual %), Retrived 2018) (Bank, Real interest rate (%), Reterived 2018) (Bank, Unemployment,
In just after the GFC we could observe that unemployment rate increased by one percent and
whereas the GDP has declined with an approx.. rate of two percent. This area shows a figure of
(annual %), Retrived 2018) (Bank, Real interest rate (%), Reterived 2018) (Bank, Unemployment,
It could be observed that in the after the period of GFC the interest rates have declined, the inflation
has also fallen steeply, but along such the unemployment has increased showing a sign of
inflationary gap.
inflation was declining. The monetary policy whose tool is the interest rate fell in 2006 but
increased in 2007, thus controlling the amount of credit in the economy, to avoid any inflationary
gap. Since the GDP constant rate was on the rise, it could be concluded that net exports were in
favor of the economy and since as stated before the monetary policy was towards contraction to
but was raised to more than six percent to control any inflation in which they succeeded. The
unemployment rate increased in 2009, and it could be highest in all the years under consideration.
The GDP constant rate has also decreased therefore showing that the net exports were unfavorable.
The fiscal policy is about same since the year just after the GFC shown a real decline in GDP
constant rate.
unemployment rate. The GDP constant rate is not consistent thus showing inconsistency in the net
exports. The inflation rate dropped in 2012 but gained momentum again in 2013, and afterward, it
again declined and again increased which also shows the fiscal policy was not leveling up with the
unemployment was decreasing steeply. The GDP constant rate was growing thus displaying a sign
that the net exports were positive, i.e., they were favorable. The inflation has also decreased but
rose for less than one percent in 2007. All these indicators indicate that fiscal policy, monetary
was previously found. The net exports seem unfavorable, the GDP constant as reduced shows that
the saving was not converted into investment, therefore, the government has cut interest rate to
GFC monetary
policy shifted
towards contraction
increased, inflation
was observed to be declining, the unemployment rate about the same which shows that this is the
unemployment which cannot be removed. Net exports seem to be favorable as the GDP constant
POLICIES EVALUATION:
In South Korea:
in the second quarter and 3.2% in the second from last quarter.
administration completed duty framework change to a course of diminishing taxation rate, keeping
in mind the end goal to support the economy. In 2008, (Christine Kim, SEPTEMBER 16, 2014)
the administration brought down the percentage of composite pay expense to till 2% bit by bit to
settle the employment of center and low level of pay and to fortify household utilization. Corporate
wage assesses rate was likewise brought down to animate speculation, and the question of expense
lessening was stretched out to help little and medium-sized organizations. (Soon-yang KIM, 12
October 2014)
policy.
In Australia:
cycle. The administration likewise merits adulate for beginning the procedure of financial
money accompanied no quid pro quos, except the consolation that it ought to be invested at the
References
Austrlia, R. B. (Reterived 2018). Interest Rate Decisions – 2009. https://www.rba.gov.au/monetary-
policy/int-rate-decisions/2009/.
Bank, W. (Reterived 2018). Unemployment, total (% of total labor force) (national estimate). Reterived
2018.
Bernhard Seliger, H. S. (Reterived 2018). MONETARY AND EXCHANGE RATE POLICIES IN NORTH KOREA
Monetary and exchange rate policy in North Korea – a tentative appraisal.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267797068_MONETARY_AND_EXCHANGE_RATE_PO
LICIES_IN_NORTH_KOREA_Monetary_and_exchange_rate_policy_in_North_Korea_-
_a_tentative_appraisal.
Christine Kim, C. Y. (SEPTEMBER 16, 2014). South Korea could keep expansionary policy for years.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-southkorea-economy-cenbank/south-korea-could-keep-
expansionary-policy-for-years-idUSKBN0HB00520140916.
Kim, H.-W. (August 2010). Macroeconomic Policies of Korea to Cope with the Crisis. Conference on
Global Economic Crisis: Impacts, Transmission, and Recovery , (p. 8).
Soon-yang KIM. (12 October 2014). South Korea’s Policy Responses to Global Economic Crisis. First
Middle East Conference on Global Business, Economics, Finance and Banking.
http://globalbizresearch.org/Dubai_Conference/pdf/pdf/D426.pdf.
Weber, E. J. (reterived 2018). AUSTRALIAN FISCAL POLICY IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE GLOBAL
FINANCIAL CRISIS. Business School University of Western Australia.