Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
net/publication/316588275
CITATIONS READS
0 452
2 authors, including:
Francisco J Juan-Garcia
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo
49 PUBLICATIONS 359 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Francisco J Juan-Garcia on 30 April 2017.
del paciente, sobre todo en la fase dinámica, en probable rela- eje de la Y para una correcta interpretación. Actualmente tiene
ción con la menor masa muscular. Las diferencias entre sexo no mayor difusión los sistemas sin cables por su mayor comodidad
son apreciables en los estudios en reposo.4,5 (Figura 1).
Figura 3
EMGS con señal en bruto (Raw) que muestra tres contracciones. Figura 5
En el eje de la X se muestra el tiempo, y en el eje de la Y la amplitud Aplicación de
en micro-voltios, tanto positivos como negativos. Cuando se electromiografía de
produce la contracción el número y amplitud de líneas aumenta, y superficie sin cables
cuando el músculo se relaja disminuyen en lumbalgia
4
Figura 6
Electromiografía de superficie
con cables región cervical
(www.kru-lauterbach.de)
BIBLIOGRAFIA
1. Cram JR. The history of surface electromyography. 14. Neblett R, Brede E, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ. What is the
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2003;28(2):81-91. best surface EMG measure of lumbar flexion-relaxation
doi:10.1023/A:1023802407132. for distinguishing chronic low back pain patients from
2. Stegeman DF, Blok JH, Hermens HJ, Roeleveld K. pain-free controls? Clin J Pain. 2013;29(4):334-340.
Surface EMG models: Properties and applications. doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e318267252d.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000;10(5):313-326. 15. Geisser M. Surface electromyography and low back pain.
doi:10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00023-7. Biofeedback. 2007;35(1):13-16.
3. Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. 16. Nederhand MJ, Hermens HJ, IJzerman MJ, Turk DC,
Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors Zilvold G. Chronic neck pain disability due to an acute
and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr whiplash injury. Pain. 2003;102(1-2):63-71. doi:10.1016/
Kinesiol. 2000;10(5):361-374. doi:10.1016/S1050- s0304-3959(02)00340-8.
6411(00)00027-4. 17. Sella GE. Neuropathology considerations:
4. Ekstrom R a, Osborn RW, Hauer PL. Surface Clinical and SEMG/biofeedback applications. Appl
electromyographic analysis of the low back muscles during Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2003;28(2):93-105.
rehabilitation exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. doi:10.1023/A:1023854423970.
2008;38(12):736-745. doi:10.2519/jospt.2008.2865. 18. Giggins OM, Persson UM, Caulfield B. Biofeedback
5. Konrad P. The abc of emg. A Pract Introd to Kinesiol . in rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013;10(1):60.
2005;(April):1-60. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.066. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-10-60.
6. Merletti R, Hermens H. Introduction to the special 19. Crary MA, Groher ME. Basic Concepts of Surface
issue on the SENIAM European Concerted Action. Electromyographic Biofeedback in the Treatment of
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000;10(5):283-286. Dysphagia: A Tutorial. Am J Speech-Language Pathol.
doi:10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00019-5. 2000;9(2):116-125. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0902.116.
7. Boone K, Barber D, Brown B. Imaging with electricity: 20. Aksac B, Aki S, Karan A, Yalcin O, Isikoglu M,
Report of the European Concerted Action on Impedance Eskiyurt N. Biofeedback and pelvic floor exercises
Tomography. J Med Eng Technol. 1997;21(6):201-232. for the rehabilitation of urinary stress incontinence.
doi:10.3109/03091909709070013. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2003;56(1):23-27.
8. Merlo A, Campanini I. Technical Aspects of Surface doi:10.1159/000072327.
Electromyography for Clinicians. Open Rehabil J. 21. Meekins GD, So Y, Quan D, Vavricek J. American
2010;3:98-109. doi:10.2174/1874943701003010098. Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic
9. Frigo C, Crenna P. Multichannel SEMG in clinical Medicine evidenced-based review: Use of surface
gait analysis: A review and state-of-the-art. Clin electromyography in the diagnosis and study of
Biomech. 2009;24(3):236-245. doi:10.1016/j. neuromuscular disorders. Muscle and Nerve.
clinbiomech.2008.07.012. 2008;38(4):1219-1224. doi:10.1002/mus.21055.
10. Chang KM, Liu SH, Wu XH. A wireless sEMG recording 22. Elhassan B, Steinmann SP. Entrapment neuropathy of the
system and its application to muscle fatigue detection. ulnar nerve. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(11):672-
Sensors. 2012;12(1):489-499. doi:10.3390/s120100489. 681. doi:15/11/672 [pii].
11. Cifrek M, Medved V, Tonković S, Ostojić S. Surface 23. Valle MS, Cioni M, Pisasale M, Pant?? MR, Casabona A.
EMG based muscle fatigue evaluation in biomechanics. Timing of muscle response to a sudden leg perturbation:
Clin Biomech. 2009;24(4):327-340. doi:10.1016/j. Comparison between adolescents and adults with down
clinbiomech.2009.01.010. syndrome. PLoS One. 2013;8(11). doi:10.1371/journal.
12. Donaldson S, Donaldson M, Snelling L. SEMG evaluations: pone.0081053.
An overview. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback.
2003;28(2):121-127. doi:10.1023/A:1023858524879.
13. Disselhorst-Klug C, Schmitz-Rode T, Rau G. Surface
electromyography and muscle force: Limits in sEMG-
force relationship and new approaches for applications.
Clin Biomech. 2009;24(3):225-235. doi:10.1016/j.
clinbiomech.2008.08.003.