Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
7 JULY 1999
1098
SUMMARY The conductor-backed asymmetrical coplanar lem as there is only a single coplanar ground. The MCS
waveguide or micro-coplanar strip (MCS) line has been analyzed. also allows greater circuit minimization since it has only
The conformal mapping method is used to calculate the quasi-
one coplanar ground. The presence of a bottom ground
static effective permittivity εef f and characteristic impedance
Z0 . The computed results of the present work are found to be plane provides improved mechanical strength, better
in good agreement when compared with the results obtained us- power handling ability and easy integration with mi-
ing the method reported by Yamashita et al. [1] and experimental crostrip lines in MMIC. Any coplanar grounds can also
values reported in [2]. A novel MCS end-coupled half-wavelength be easily grounded by means of via holes to the con-
long resonator filter is designed to illustrate an application of the
present work. The designed filter has 4% bandwidth at a center
ductor backing.
frequency of 10.5 GHz. The measured insertion loss is approx- The Rectangular Boundary Division Method
imately 3.4 dB. One of the main advantages of the MCS filter (RBDM) is used in [1] to analyze the MCS line, which
compared to the CPW filter is that bond wires do not have to results in long polynomial fomulas for CAD. In another
be used to maintain both coplanar ground at the same poten-
paper by Qian and Yamashita [2], closed-form design
tial. The MCS filter is also easily integrable with other planar
components and does not require a complicated transition to mi- equations for 50 Ω MCS lines were obtained by curve
crostrip. fitting data obtained from RBDM. The lack of any fast
key words: asymmetric CPW, microwave lter, end-coupled closed-form equations for the MCS is a severe handicap
lter in using the line in microwave circuits. The purpose of
this paper is to derive simple closed-form expressions
1. Introduction for the characteristic impedance, Z0 , and effective di-
electric constant, εef f , of the MCS line using conformal
The conductor-backed asymmetrical coplanar wave- mapping techniques. The quasi-static conformal map-
guide or micro-coplanar strip line is first proposed by E. ping method has been used to analyze many types of
Yamashita [1] to avoid the proximity effect of a coplanar coplanar lines [3], [4], providing satisfactory accuracy at
ground near a microstrip line. The MCS configuration microwave frequencies. The derived equations in this
is illustrated in Fig. 1. paper are then used to design an end gap-coupled half
The MCS line consists of a conductor of width w wave resonator band pass filter [5]. The designed fil-
in parallel with a single infinite coplanar ground to- ter retains all important advantages of the MCS line
gether with a bottom ground plane. The planar ar- compared to CPW or microstrip filters.
rangement of both conductors is advantageous in that
it allows simple connections of 2 terminal microwave 2. Analysis of MCS Line
components and also lowers the influence of substrate
thickness on the parameters of the transmission line. The zeroth-order approximation of a quasi-TEM struc-
In coplanar waveguide (CPW), an undesirable slotline- ture is assumed. The analysis is based on the assump-
mode surface wave may be excited if the two coplanar tion that the air-dielectric interface can be modeled
grounds are not at the same ground potential. Thus, as perfect magnetic walls (Neumann boundary condi-
air bridges or bond wires are usually used to ensure tions). Hence, the total capacitance per unit length of
that the two coplanar grounds are kept at the same po- the line can be computed as the sum of the capacitance
tential. However, the air bridges introduce unwanted of the upper half plane (in air) and the lower half plane
inductances and complex circuit topology may results (in dielectric). The conductor thickness is assumed to
in floating grounds. The MCS line eliminates this prob-
Manuscript received December 26, 1998.
Manuscript revised March 15, 1999.
†
The authors are with the Electrical Engineering De-
partment, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge
Crescent, Singapore 119260.
a) E-mail: elesu@nus.edu.sg Fig. 1 Micro-coplanar strip (MCS) line.
TAN and UYSAL: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF CONDUCTOR-BACKED ASYMMETRIC COPLANAR WAVEGUIDE LINES
1099
be infinitely thin. As a rule of thumb, this approxi- where k2 = a/b = s/(s + w). To find C2 , the fol-
mation is satisfied if the substrate thickness h is larger lowing conformal mapping sequences are adopted. The
than the lateral extension of the line b. conductor backing and the dielectric is mapped into a
Thus, the total capacitance of the MCS line is: t-plane (Fig. 3) using the following mapping function:
C = C1 + C2 (1) t = exp(zπ/h) (4)
where C1 is the capacitance in the upper half plane s1 = C t − P t
(air) and C2 is the capacitance in the dielectric. = exp(sπ/h) − 1 (5a)
The following mapping function is used to map the
upper half plane of the MCS line into a parallel plate w1 = Dt − Ct
capacitor as shown in Fig. 2: = exp((s + w)π/h) − exp(sπ/h)
t = exp(sπ/h)[exp(wπ/h) − 1] (5b)
dt
w=A +B (2)
0 t(t − a)(t − b) The t-plane configuration is similar to the evaluation
The shape factor or modulus of the rectangle in the of C1 using (2).
t-plane is given by: Thus
k2 = a/b = s/(s + w) C = C1 + C2
K (k) K (k1 )
The ratio K(k)/K (k) can be easily found from tables = ε0
K(k)
+ ε0 εr
K(K1 )
(7)
or it can be approximated by: for K/K ≥ 1 or k ≥
0.707:
εef f = C(εr )/C(1)
K/K = (1/π)ln{4(1 + k)/(1 − k)}
for K/K ≤ 1 or k ≤ 0.707: K (k1 ) K(k)
1 + εr
K(k1 ) K (k)
K/K = π/[ln{4(1 + k )/(1 − k )}] εef f = (8)
K (k1 ) K(k)
1+
where k = (1 − k2 )0.5 . Thus, from Fig. 2, K(k1 ) K (k)
and
C1 = εo K (k)/K(k) (3)
Z0 = 1/(Vph C)
120π 1
= √ (9)
εef f K (k) K (k1 )
+
K(k) K(k1 )
The above equations are valid for h > (s + w).
π∆ω
Jn,n+1 = Y0 (12)
2gn gn+1 ω1
where gi are the element values and ω1 is the corner fre-
quency of the corresponding low-pass prototype. ∆ω is
the fractional bandwidth of the band-pass filter, Ji,i+1
are the admittance inverter parameters and Y0 is the
characteristic admittance of the resonators. The res-
onators are normally chosen to have identical charac- Fig. 9 Detailed dimensions of interdigitated gaps.
teristic impedance to simplify the design.
The admittance inverters are realized using MCS
gaps. The inverters could be modeled as a π network such that the fingers and separation between the fingers
or a series capacitor embedded between negative elec- are within the limits of the fabrication process.
trical lengths of transmission lines [8]. A shunt capaci- The negative lengths of transmission 7 lines in the
tance in the π network model accounts for the fringing admittance inverters can be absorbed into the adjacent
capacitance and models a MCS gap more accurately. half-wavelength resonators. Hence the resonators are
However, the series capacitance model is more suitable less than a half-wavelength long and their final lengths,
for filter design due to its simplicity and hence was used ri , are given by:
in this work. Moreover, the shunt capacitance could be c
ri = √ (π − ρi−1,i − ρi,i+1 ) (15)
considered as a small effective lengthening of the ad- 2πf0 εef f
joining transmission lines which can then be deducted
from the adjacent resonators. where c is the speed of light in free space, f0 is the
The series capacitance, Ci,i+1 and the negative center-frequency of the filter and εef f is the effective
electrical length, −ρi,i+1 in the admittance inverters dielectric constant of the MCS resonators. Once all
shown in Fig. 7 are calculated with the use of equations the dimensions are known, the whole circuit can be
provided in [10]: simulated and optimized using IE3D.
5. Conclusions