Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

Maturitas 69 (2011) 91–93

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Maturitas
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/maturitas

Birth-weight as a risk factor for cancer in adulthood: The stem cell perspective
C. Capittini a,∗ , P. Bergamaschi a , A. De Silvestri b , A. Marchesi a , V. Genovese a , B. Romano a ,
C. Tinelli b , L. Salvaneschi a
a
Pavia Cord Blood Bank, Transfusion Medicine Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
b
Statistics Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: The ‘stem cell burden’ hypothesis represents a plausible explanation for the association between birth-
Received 8 October 2010 weight and the risk of breast cancer in adulthood. The size of the overall stem cell pool would be expected
Received in revised form 1 February 2011 to affect organ size and consequently birth-weight, making birth-weight a proxy for the overall number
Accepted 8 February 2011
of fetal stem cells. As stem cells are self-renewing, the greater their number is at birth, the higher will be
the chance that one of them will undergo carcinogenesis over the years. To investigate the correlation
between birth-weight and stem cell burden, we examined the cord blood hematopoietic CD34+ stem
Keywords:
cell population as an indicator of the overall fetal stem cell number. We measured both the CD34+ level
Cancer risk
Birth weight
(by flow cytometry) and the CD34+ proliferative potential (by the GM-CFU culture), in a sample of 1037
Stem cell healthy newborn cord blood donors. We found that heavier babies had a significantly greater CD34+
Proliferative potential stem cell concentration (p < 0.001) and a higher GM-CFU number than lighter babies (p < 0.001). Thus, a
high birth-weight was positively associated with a high concentration of CD34+ stem cells and also with
a qualitatively higher “stemness” of this pool. Therefore, our data support the theory that birth-weight
reflects the number of fetal stem cells.
© 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction To investigate the correlation between birth-weight and stem


cell burden, we examined the cord blood hematopoietic CD34+
It has been argued that early life factors, such as birth-weight stem cell population as an indicator of the overall fetal stem cell
and rapid growth during infancy, can affect the lifetime risk of number.
breast cancer [1]. An intriguing link between birth-weight and
the risk of breast cancer in adulthood is represented by the ‘stem
cell burden’ hypothesis, first proposed by Trichopoulos and Lip-
worth [2]. Somatic stem cells are present in the breast (and indeed 2. Materials and methods
many other tissues) from fetal development, and as they are long-
living and self-renewing they are especially likely, over a lifespan, 2.1. Study subjects
to undergo oncogenic mutation. The higher the number of breast
stem cells at birth, the greater will be the possibility that one of Our study examined a total of 1037 healthy newborns regis-
these cells will mutate [3]. Furthermore, it has been reported that a tered at the Cord Blood Bank of Pavia (IRCCS Foundation Policlinico
general increase in the stem cell pool can affect organ size, and con- San Matteo, Pavia, Italy). All mothers gave their signed voluntary
sequently birth-weight [4]. Thus, although birth-weight itself does informed consent to participate in the cord blood banking pro-
not play a causal role in the development of cancer, it may be an gram for unrelated stem cell transplantation. Following the Bank’s
indicator of stem cell number, and thereby be positively associated protocols, a specifically trained physician obtained a complete
with adult cancer risk (not only of breast cancer but essentially for medical history of the newborn’s family (mother, father, siblings
all tissues containing stem cell niches). and grandparents). An exhaustive obstetric history (i.e. of previous
pregnancies) was also obtained, so that we could exclude women
with recurrent spontaneous abortions from donation. Furthermore,
during each pregnancy the health of both the mother and the
fetus was carefully monitored, in order to exclude from donation
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 0382 503088. any stem cells derived from pathological pregnancies, including
E-mail address: cristina.capittini@libero.it (C. Capittini). preterm ones (<37 gestational weeks).

0378-5122/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.02.013
92 C. Capittini et al. / Maturitas 69 (2011) 91–93

2.2. Cord blood collection Table 1


The geometric means of CD34+ stem cell concentration (CD34+/␮L) and GM-CFU
×104 count are shown in the four birth-weight percentile groups: <25, 25–49.99,
Immediately after birth, cord blood was collected from umbil- 50–75, >75. SD: standard deviation.
ical vessels by in utero technique; only samples of 50 ml or more
CD34+/␮L GM-CFU ×104
and containing at least 800 × 106 nucleated cells were banked for
transplantation purposes. Mean SD Mean SD

<25 27.77 20.49 304.82 257.37


2.3. Analysis of hematopoietic stem cell populations by flow 25–49.99 34.96 28.39 395.83 359.20
cytometry 50–75 36.96 28.31 445.41 431.21
>75 37.58 28.48 501.17 519.57

We measured the population of hematopoietic progenitor stem


cells by flow cytometry, detecting the expression of the CD34 and Table 1 shows the geometric means of the CD34+ stem cell
CD45 antigens. Cells were stained with CD34 (PE) and CD45 (FITC) concentration and GM-CFU count in each of the four percentile
antibodies (BD Biosciences, San José, CA, USA), and the CD34+ groups. The first group (<25 percentile) had a mean CD34+ stem cell
cell count was determined using both single- and double-platform count of 27.77 per ␮L (standard deviation, SD, 20.49), and a mean
methods, according to the guidelines of the International Society of GM-CFU count of 304.82 × 104 (SD 257.37). The fourth group (>75
Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering (ISHAGE) [5]. percentile) had a mean CD34+ stem cell count of 37.58 per ␮L (SD
28.48) and a mean GM-CFU count of 501.17 × 104 (SD 519.57). The
percentage difference in these parameters between the first and
2.4. Analysis of hematopoietic stem cell potential by GM-CFU
the fourth percentile group was 35% (95% CI 24–46) for the CD34+
assay
stem cell concentration and 67% (95% CI 47–84) for the GM-CFU
count.
Hematopoietic progenitors are able to form colonies in vitro
We then treated birth-weight as a continuous variable and con-
when stimulated by specific growth factors. The proliferative
sidered estimates for a 25-point percentile increase in birth-weight.
potential of CD34+ stem cells is expressed by the growth of colonies
Using a parametric regression, we examined the association
derived from granulocyte monocyte-colony forming units (GM-
between CD34+ stem cell concentration and GM-CFU count across
CFUs). Thus, the GM-CFU assay is a complementary analysis which
the whole range of birth-weight percentiles. We found a posi-
can usefully confirm the results of flow cytometry, and it also
tive association between birth-weight percentile groups and both
identifies CD34+ clonogenicity. The procedure consists of setting
CD34+ stem cell concentration (p < 0.001) and GM-CFU count
up duplicate short-term cell cultures in a semi-solid medium
(p < 0.001). Each 25–point percentile increase in birth-weight was
(MethoCult® GF H84444, StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, BC,
associated with a 16.0% (95% CI 7.2–34.8%) higher CD34+ stem
Canada). Cord blood cells are added to the culture medium to reach
cell concentration and a 61.0% (95% CI 49.5–73.5%) higher GM-CFU
a plating concentration of 1.7 × 104 cells per 35 mm dish. For 14
count.
days, the plates are incubated at 37 ◦ C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2
and >95% humidity. The colonies are then counted and classified.
4. Discussion

2.5. Percentiles based on birth-weight, gestational age and gender


Birth-weight is positively associated with cancer risk, in partic-
ular breast cancer risk, in adulthood [1]; one explanation for this
Birth-weight, gender and gestational weeks of the 1037 new-
association is that birth-weight is an indicator of the size of the
borns were obtained from hospital records. Following the fetal
pool of long-living and self-renewing fetal stem cells, which are
growth curves in use at the Obstetric-Gynecological Clinic of the
candidates for oncogenic mutations over the lifespan [2–4].
IRCCS Foundation of the Policlinico San Matteo of Pavia [6], each
We analyzed the correlation between birth-weight and both the
baby was assigned to a percentile, according to birth-weight, ges-
CD34+ stem cell concentration and the clonogenic potential (GM-
tational age and gender. Then, the 1037 infants were divided into
CFU count) of this stem cell pool for a sample of 1037 cord blood
four percentile groups: <25, 25–49.99, 50–75, >75.
infant donors. Our babies were born from physiological pregnancies
and were all healthy at birth.
2.6. Statistical analysis We first considered the mean values of CD34+ stem cell concen-
tration and GM-CFU count in four percentile groups: <25, 25–49.99,
First, we studied birth-weight as a categorical variable. We 50–75, >75. Going from the first to the fourth group, we found a
estimated the geometric means for the CD34+ stem cell concen- gradual increase in the mean parameters: heavier babies had both
tration and the GM-CFU count within four percentile groups: <25, a greater CD34+ stem cell concentration and a higher GM-CFU count
25–49.99, 50–75, >75. We calculated the percentage difference in than lighter babies (Table 1).
these parameters between the first and the fourth group, taking The impact of CD34+ stem cell concentration and proliferation
into consideration a 95% confidence interval (CI). Subsequently, we on birth-weight appears evident, particularly for clonogenicity, as
treated birth-weight as a continuous variable, and considered how the percentage differences in these parameters between the first
a 25-point percentile increase in birth-weight would affect the stem and the fourth percentile groups were 35% and 67%, respectively.
cell count. We then used a parametric regression to examine the In order to identify a good marker for the overall number of
association between birth-weight (using the <25 percentile group fetal stem cells, Strohsnitter and colleagues measured hematopoi-
as the reference) and CD34+ stem cell concentration and GM-CFU etic CD34+ stem cell levels in the cord blood of 288 term newborns
count. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. [7]. The authors found a positive association between birth-weight
and CD34+ stem cell concentration: each 500 g increase in weight
3. Results at birth was associated with a 15.5% increase in the number of stem
cells in cord blood samples.
We analyzed the birth-weight and cord blood CD34+ stem cell In our parametric regression analysis we found a positive asso-
data of 1037 full-term infants registered in the Cord Blood Bank of ciation not only between CD34+ stem cell concentration and
Pavia. percentile groups (p < 0.001), but also between GM-CFU count and
C. Capittini et al. / Maturitas 69 (2011) 91–93 93

percentile groups (p < 0.001). Further, each 25-point percentile Andrea Marchesi, Valeria Genovese, Bina Romano made CD34+
increase in birth-weight was associated with a 16% higher stem stem cell and GM-CFU assays; Laura Salvaneschi is the Direc-
cell concentration and with a 61% higher clonogenic potential in tor of the Pavia Cord Blood Bank and revised both data and
cord blood samples. manuscript.
These data support previous findings of a direct correlation
between birth-weight and hematopoietic CD34+ stem cell num- Funding
ber [7], and suggest that birth-weight correlates not only with fetal
stem cell density, but also with stem cell proliferation. That is, a The authors Cristina Capittini, Paola Bergamaschi, Annal-
higher birth-weight is correlated not only with a quantitatively isa De Silvestri, Andrea Marchesi, Valeria Genovese, Bina
higher concentration of CD34+ stem cells, but also with a quali- Romano, Carmine Tinelli, and Laura Salvaneschi declare no
tatively higher ‘stemness’ of this pool. funding.
Our data provide further support for the theory that high birth-
weight reflects the fetal stem cell number, in accordance with the Acknowledgements
stem cell burden hypothesis. Nevertheless, as the molecular and
cellular mechanisms underlying fetal stem cell pool expansion are We wish to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their con-
still poorly understood, many questions remain. What are the key structive comments on the draft of this manuscript, and Dr. Anna
regulators of the fetal stem cell potential? Are these factors con- Bertoni and Dr. Francesca Cattaneo, our proof-readers. A special
nected in a single network, or do they belong to different pathways? thank for the contribution of Mrs. Linda Johns for the English
Is there a genetic or an epigenetic program influencing fetal stem revision.
cell potential?
References
4.1. Closing remarks
[1] Eden JA. Breast cancer, stem cells and sex hormones. Part 1. The impact of fetal
As the intrauterine environment strongly influences the fetal life and infancy. Maturitas 2010. PMID: 20579822.
stem cell number, which in turn increases the adult cancer risk, it [2] Trichopoulos D, Lipworth L. Is cancer causation simpler than we thought, but
more intractable? Epidemiology 1995;6(4):347–9.
seems logical to presume that the months spent by the fetus in the [3] Savarese TM, Low HP, Baik I, et al. Normal breast stem cells, malignant
uterus can influence future cancer risk. breast stem cells, and the perinatal origin of breast cancer. Stem Cell Rev
2006;2(2):103–10.
[4] Trichopoulos D, Lagiou P, Adami HO. Towards an integrated model for breast
Competing of interests cancer etiology: the crucial role of the number of mammary tissue-specific stem
cells. Breast Cancer Res 2005;7(1):13–7.
The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of inter- [5] Gratama JW, Orfao A, Barnett D, et al. Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+
hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, European Working Group on Clinical
ests. Cell Analysis. Cytometry 1998;34(3):128–42.
[6] Guerrini P, Candini G, Parmagnani M. Curve dell’accrescimento endouterino da
Contributors 26 a 42 settimane di gravidanza. Riv Ital Ped 1986;12:79–84.
[7] Strohsnitter WC, Savarese TM, Low HP, et al. Correlation of umbilical cord
blood haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell levels with birth weight:
Cristina Capittini and Paola Bergamaschi wrote the manuscript; implications for a prenatal influence on cancer risk. Br J Cancer 2008;98(3):
Annalisa De Silvestri and Carmine Tinelli made statistical analyses; 660–3.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen