Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Maturitas
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/maturitas
Birth-weight as a risk factor for cancer in adulthood: The stem cell perspective
C. Capittini a,∗ , P. Bergamaschi a , A. De Silvestri b , A. Marchesi a , V. Genovese a , B. Romano a ,
C. Tinelli b , L. Salvaneschi a
a
Pavia Cord Blood Bank, Transfusion Medicine Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
b
Statistics Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The ‘stem cell burden’ hypothesis represents a plausible explanation for the association between birth-
Received 8 October 2010 weight and the risk of breast cancer in adulthood. The size of the overall stem cell pool would be expected
Received in revised form 1 February 2011 to affect organ size and consequently birth-weight, making birth-weight a proxy for the overall number
Accepted 8 February 2011
of fetal stem cells. As stem cells are self-renewing, the greater their number is at birth, the higher will be
the chance that one of them will undergo carcinogenesis over the years. To investigate the correlation
between birth-weight and stem cell burden, we examined the cord blood hematopoietic CD34+ stem
Keywords:
cell population as an indicator of the overall fetal stem cell number. We measured both the CD34+ level
Cancer risk
Birth weight
(by flow cytometry) and the CD34+ proliferative potential (by the GM-CFU culture), in a sample of 1037
Stem cell healthy newborn cord blood donors. We found that heavier babies had a significantly greater CD34+
Proliferative potential stem cell concentration (p < 0.001) and a higher GM-CFU number than lighter babies (p < 0.001). Thus, a
high birth-weight was positively associated with a high concentration of CD34+ stem cells and also with
a qualitatively higher “stemness” of this pool. Therefore, our data support the theory that birth-weight
reflects the number of fetal stem cells.
© 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
0378-5122/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.02.013
92 C. Capittini et al. / Maturitas 69 (2011) 91–93
percentile groups (p < 0.001). Further, each 25-point percentile Andrea Marchesi, Valeria Genovese, Bina Romano made CD34+
increase in birth-weight was associated with a 16% higher stem stem cell and GM-CFU assays; Laura Salvaneschi is the Direc-
cell concentration and with a 61% higher clonogenic potential in tor of the Pavia Cord Blood Bank and revised both data and
cord blood samples. manuscript.
These data support previous findings of a direct correlation
between birth-weight and hematopoietic CD34+ stem cell num- Funding
ber [7], and suggest that birth-weight correlates not only with fetal
stem cell density, but also with stem cell proliferation. That is, a The authors Cristina Capittini, Paola Bergamaschi, Annal-
higher birth-weight is correlated not only with a quantitatively isa De Silvestri, Andrea Marchesi, Valeria Genovese, Bina
higher concentration of CD34+ stem cells, but also with a quali- Romano, Carmine Tinelli, and Laura Salvaneschi declare no
tatively higher ‘stemness’ of this pool. funding.
Our data provide further support for the theory that high birth-
weight reflects the fetal stem cell number, in accordance with the Acknowledgements
stem cell burden hypothesis. Nevertheless, as the molecular and
cellular mechanisms underlying fetal stem cell pool expansion are We wish to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their con-
still poorly understood, many questions remain. What are the key structive comments on the draft of this manuscript, and Dr. Anna
regulators of the fetal stem cell potential? Are these factors con- Bertoni and Dr. Francesca Cattaneo, our proof-readers. A special
nected in a single network, or do they belong to different pathways? thank for the contribution of Mrs. Linda Johns for the English
Is there a genetic or an epigenetic program influencing fetal stem revision.
cell potential?
References
4.1. Closing remarks
[1] Eden JA. Breast cancer, stem cells and sex hormones. Part 1. The impact of fetal
As the intrauterine environment strongly influences the fetal life and infancy. Maturitas 2010. PMID: 20579822.
stem cell number, which in turn increases the adult cancer risk, it [2] Trichopoulos D, Lipworth L. Is cancer causation simpler than we thought, but
more intractable? Epidemiology 1995;6(4):347–9.
seems logical to presume that the months spent by the fetus in the [3] Savarese TM, Low HP, Baik I, et al. Normal breast stem cells, malignant
uterus can influence future cancer risk. breast stem cells, and the perinatal origin of breast cancer. Stem Cell Rev
2006;2(2):103–10.
[4] Trichopoulos D, Lagiou P, Adami HO. Towards an integrated model for breast
Competing of interests cancer etiology: the crucial role of the number of mammary tissue-specific stem
cells. Breast Cancer Res 2005;7(1):13–7.
The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of inter- [5] Gratama JW, Orfao A, Barnett D, et al. Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+
hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, European Working Group on Clinical
ests. Cell Analysis. Cytometry 1998;34(3):128–42.
[6] Guerrini P, Candini G, Parmagnani M. Curve dell’accrescimento endouterino da
Contributors 26 a 42 settimane di gravidanza. Riv Ital Ped 1986;12:79–84.
[7] Strohsnitter WC, Savarese TM, Low HP, et al. Correlation of umbilical cord
blood haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell levels with birth weight:
Cristina Capittini and Paola Bergamaschi wrote the manuscript; implications for a prenatal influence on cancer risk. Br J Cancer 2008;98(3):
Annalisa De Silvestri and Carmine Tinelli made statistical analyses; 660–3.