Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
13278
PERSPECTIVE
1
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, and 2School of Medicine, The
University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Competing interests
None declared.
References
1. Palao R, Monge I, Ruiz M,
Barret JP. Chemical burns: patho-
physiology and treatment. Burns
2010; 36: 295–304.
2. Bonavina L, Chirica M, Skrobic O
et al. Foregut caustic injuries: results
Figure 1. Proposed management algorithm. of the world society of emergency
surgery consensus conference. World 5. Chirica M, Resche-Rigon M, ingestion. The Lancet 2017; 289:
J. Emerg. Surg. 2015; 10: 44. Pariente B et al. Computed tomogra- 2041–52.
3. Bonnici KS, Wood DM, Dargan PI. phy evaluation of high-grade esopha- 8. Ryu HH, Jeung KW, Lee BK et al.
Should computerised tomography geal necrosis after corrosive ingestion Caustic injury: can CT grading sys-
replace endosocopy in the evaluation to avoid unnecessary esophagec- tem enable prediction of esophageal
of symptomatic ingestion of corrosive tomy. Surg. Endosc. 2015; 29: stricture? Clin. Toxicol. (Phila.)
substances? Clin. Toxicol. 2014; 52: 1452–61. 2010; 48: 137–42.
911–25. 6. Chirica M, Resche-Rigon M, 9. Kocchar R, Ashat M, Reddy YR et al.
4. Zargar SA, Kochhar R, Mehta S, Zagdanski A et al. Computed Relook endoscopy predicts the devel-
Mehta SK. The role of fiberoptic tomography evaluation of esophago- opment of esophageal and antropy-
endoscopy in the management of cor- gastric necrosis after caustic inges- loric stenosis better than immediate
rosive ingestion and modified endo- tion. Ann. Surg. 2016; 264: 107–13. endoscopy in patients with caustic
scopic classification of burns. 7. Chirica M, Bonavina L, Kelly M, ingestion. Endoscopy 2017; 49:
Gastrointest. Endosc. 1991; 37: 165–9. Sarfati E, Cattan P. Caustic 643–50.