Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
according to
A Thesis
submittea in conforxiiity with the requirements;,
by
1947
IBS OdiAZK or Loaic
AOCOKDUBfO
sAunr ffiOMAs aqjoikas
A IhMla
1947
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES
of
COMMITTEE IN CHARGE
Professor R. S. Kxox, Chairman
Professor F. H. Anderson
Professor A. Pecis
Professor I. T. Eschman.v
Professor J. R. O'Donnell
Professor H. R. MacCallum
Professor J. A. Irving
Professor T. A. Goudce
Professor 0. Edison
Professor W. M. D. LoNO
BIOGRAPHICAL
1909 Born, Ciiicinnati, Ohio.
1932 Litt. B., Xavier University (Cincinnati).
1934 M.A., Xavier University
1935 Diploine d'Etudes Francaises, Universite de Poitiers.
1937-39 Instructor, University of Detroit High School.
1938, '40, '43 (Summer Sessions) Lecturer, Xavier University.
1945, '46 (Summer Sessions) Lecturer, Loyola University (Chicago).
1944-47 School of Graduate Studies, University of Toronto.
THESIS
Tlie Domain oj Logic according to St. Thomas Aquinas
,
(abstract)
Logic, in the view of St. Thomas Aquinas, is both an art and a science. By
logic as an art reason guides its own operations to its proper end, which is to
know the true. Not effecting a material product, it caimot be an art in the
strict sense; but because certain immanent terms and instruments of knowing
are constituted, logic is considered a liberal art. As a science it studies these
instruments of knowing. Thus it is a science of science rather than of things,
and so is not a science strictly, but is an instrument of the sciences. Through
them, especially those which are speculative, logic is ordered to the know^ledge of
real tilings, and can be said to be reductively speculative.
It is the instruments of knowing rather than real things or the acts of reason
which logic studies. Because the first exist only in reason and by consequence of
the manner in which things are known, they are called "beings of reason" or
"intentions."
''Being of reason" or "rationate being" {ens rationis) is set over against real
being. Not everything that we can think of has real existence; some things exist
only in thought. Of these some have non-existence in their very delinition such ;
are negations and privations. Others, such as fictions, have a positive notion,
but do not really exist. Theretwo kinds of rationate being,
are, therefore,
negative and positive. And
must be either negation or relation.
rationate being
Positive rationate being must accordingly be a form of relation. With negative
rationate being logic is not concerned, but only with the positive, which is reduced
to relation. Among positive rationate beings are some which have no foundation
in reality, while others have. Regarding the first, pure fictions, tliere can be no
science; and so logic does not deal with them, but only with founded rationate
being. The foundation of this sort of being can lie in reality either immediately,
as, for example, in the case of direct concepts or of the notion of time, or
mediately, as in the intention of genus. The kind of rationate being which logic
reflect, first, upon itself ; secondly, on its maimer of apprehension ; and thirdly, on
the way in whicli the nature exists in the intellect as a consequence. By this three-
fold reflection the logical or "second" intention is formed. This intention is called
"second" because it is understood after the nature itself is apprehended. It is an
accident of the nature, not of the nature as it exists in reality, but, precisely
speaking, as il is known. This typ,e of accident exists only in the intellect, is a
"being of reason," and constitutes the subject of logic.
The only kind of accident that can exist in reason alone is relation; all others
posit something in exislcircc. Relation does not by itsmere notion posit anything
in its subject ; it is only "to something" ; it is just a regard, a bearing, or an order
of the subject to something else; and this can exist either in reality or only in
thought. If a relation is real, however, it is so because its subject, its term, and
its foundation are all real; otherwise it is a relation in tJiought only.
Among relations which can exist only in thought are some which "follow upon
the act of reason," are devised by die intellect, and are attributed to things pre-
cisely as known. They are the relations which logic studies as its subject. To
this kind of relation both positive rationate being and logical uitentions are reduced.
There are llu^ee principal kinds of logical intention; those of universality, of attri-
bution, and of consequence.
individuals of its kind. When the intellect reflects upon tlie abstracted manner in
which the nature exists in the intellect and compares it to the individuals or less
universal, inferior natures, it perceives it to be applicable to many and similar to
all. The relation of similarity of the apprehended nature to many inferiors is tlie
intention of universality. The subject of this relation is tlie natirre as apprehended;
its term is the nature as restricted or mdividualized in its mferiors; its foundation
is the abstractness of the nature as it exists in the intellect.
known and already confusedly present in knowledge from the first. In judgment
one apprehended nature is compared with another through a comparison of both
of tliese natures to the real thing, in which the reality represented by one appre-
hended nature is perceived to exist in the thuig represented by the other appre-
hended nature, as a formal determination ui a supposite. Through this comparison
the real conjunction or identity of the represented natures is affirmed. There is
here not an identification of tlie natures in the abstract but of the real thing dif-
ferently represented by both natm-es.
supposite. The subject and predicate are joined by the copula to be in a. relation
of identity in the concrete subject. In the real order when form, the act of matter,
informs its matter, the whole composite is actuated and exercises its act, which is
to be. So in the order of intention when the predicate, the formal determination
of the subject, is joined to the subject and is perceived to be in it, the whole in-
tellectual composite is actuated and has existence in the mind. For this reason
(0 6c in a proposition, effecting and signifying composition in the order of thought,
is a sign of the composition and actual existence in the real order of the thing
known.
By its very nature llie proposition is an attestation of t)ie conformity of tlie
intellect to iJie concrete thing known). The proposition thus attesting is the
"being in the sense of the true" which logic studies. As a relation of identity
between subject and predicate, and therefore of two terras distinct in thought but
not in reality, the proposition can be only a relation of reason. The subject of
this relation is the predicate; the term of this relation is the subject of the pro-
position; and its foundation is the apprehended existence of the nature signified
by the predicate in the supposite signified by the subject. The remote foundation
is tlie real imity or concrete existence of the thing known.
Another intention, that of consequence, follows upon reasoning. Reasoning is
middle term in the minor. This foundation rests immediately upon the comparative
operation of reason, and remotely upon the efficient causality of real things, which
brings about composition, the information of a designated matter by a determining
form, and the reduction of potency to act.
Logical being, accordingly, as St. Thomas conceives it, is not only to be ex-
plained by analogy to the real but is seen to be dependent upon il;. This
dependence, though remote, is always present. Proximately there is a dependence
upon the manner of knowing the real. In its ultimate nature logical being, which
PUBLICATIONS
"'The Prose of Francis Thompson," Month (London) CLXVI (1935) 134-141.
Tli-e
"The Realism of Jules Lachelier," The Modern Sclwolman XVII (1940) 31-37.
GRADU.-VTE STUDIES
Major Subject:
Medieval Philosophy— Professor G. B. Phel.in,
Professor A. Pegis.
Minor Subjects:
Systematic Philosophy— Professor F. H. Anderson,
Professor H. R. MacCallum.
Greek and Latin Patristics— Professor J. T. MucKLE.
TABLE OOr OOllTBMIS
PA08
iv
BMR II
tts stmsat or mx aaajsor oi Loaio
FART III
vat xammcm of iss quob mts or aiAson
coRoxaaon 287
mm% U Lo^o? 887
9m atbjooi of Logio 890
tatlMMto B«ii« 891
latoal&oa 898
Rolvtioa 896
latOBtioa of Ualwoellty 898
laftoBlloa of /ttrlbutioa 300
lataatloa of CoMogpoaoo 806
Sflllwt MatuMO of 9lMida%lt Locio 806
310
UBLiooBAnnr 574
WSSSSSSS
hma bMH e prtlblm of tb« rolatioos bftw otn %hm roal world vkidi philo-
•«|lqr Millet to iBBAoniftaM aaA OBplalB, an4 %1m tbou^t kqr «hl<li it
wiiiM t« «i9laU !%• It WHO fouad ttuit ttoug^t hod oorttiia ro<i«ir»-
Mito oad oeoditlono of its own. If tbo roal world wno to bo him! or
otood tfesm^ tho«#t, thoopo woo « qiaootioa wbothor theutfkt oad tho
voel eorraopoadod in oil roopooto, nnd thorofmro wbothw thogr hod tho
•tttdy tboufl^at tmd tbo psooooo of Icaowing and tbo oondltlooo wbieh tbo
•Ofhoro eould thon aoro ouroly aoko uso of it to oxtIto «t tho know*
Xodgo of tbo rool world «hi^ tbiy woro oo^ine* witltout dwgor of
rooding into tbo rool what io poouliar to tbougbt.
wbi«h io otiU nooo — B»y» and for tbo aaaw roaooao. It turn an i^por-
follow noeoaoerily that, tor tbo undorot ending of aagr nan'o philooo*
fitted t«a«bl&g» It is iBvortaat to kaon utiat h« ooBMlv»d Xogio to
bot f>t. ISmmmui ooBsidsrod Xogio to bo, ittiet its domiin is witbia tbo
SBt vpeai tbo toaabiaes of A<juiaas ia l^is aattw would bo bsgroad ttiis
oal tnitb rstbsr tbaa sMoluto pfailosofbieal trutb. Wbotbtr ttio two
amo otbor nero striotly pbilosojbioal studir or for tbo privato ooa>
is sagr ftortbor aood for sosb a atudFt w abotbor tboro aro eiiar ossgo-
tieal aad dootriaal probloas loft unsolvod. Ibo purpoao for abiOb nost
tnm tbo proaoat atudy. Moat aro intoodod aa aMumala of logic for elnss-
rosM aao) nad booaaao logio is olaost uaivoraelly tau|0xt at tbo bogia-
of tho natonro of lecioai iNdJid, Ito rolatlmu) to roel boiii«, fia4 Its
OB to aacpooo ito Tariotto klnda, Ito prittolploo, esA ooao of Ito eppll-
lOBio, oao aoot either reetriet the dioeuoeimi of eaofa of the muKf
the latter oouroo* fimtm tho itoet imluEdaouo of tho eiwved eoholeotio
huadred peces eeoh,^ s*»a with thie sise not MMh philooophieel die-
aoao* aoaa, aaah aa tho Latia naaaala of Iltasea or Firotta, sire oaa»
taoKtual qtietetioaaa but ne eee aerily few beoauae of their amall siso
lofio of St* Thoaaa ie the old work of /liwwnnn, wbiA datee fro« Idia.
A« tit* fInrt •eetloa of th* first voImm of • t—* IfcU—wbt— «hi«l»
U otapllo* fxtw tlio wexks of at, 'Stsomut, it «mo aaagr toad* «hi«b it
But tiho MTO eoUooatioa and nrawflng of tho nattoar iufolr— in itoolf
vQtk diff«p« Botably frw our ourrout awMOls, vAiiiii soofa llttX* but
•stio dlMMsaicNMi in the torn of quMtions and «rti«lM, @ir«B ita faora
Far tha ttaaatiOM tvantaA in our firat and in part of fba tMrd iftap>
Eis Ara Logjoa . a «*i«^ty toaa of ai|0it Iranftrad and thirt]r-aix two-
Uttla attantioai. still othar quastioM «r« avt traatad. viuit ahiafljr
ill
not MBOlt affort at aensoala and ttto aanplaaatlMi of taict tqr taKt{ but
tho eutluor vvoooote on hia o«a, aaA tho qootatlOM ara Ineldaatia to
taufllht.
taBctual a—laatton of too aoxko of St* fhowM had alroadr boatt aaUka
sragha oa logioal ^Euaatioaa ara faa,^ aad of toooo aoct aro dovotod
trlaa arolvad mat follow toa taxta* Ihla aaaaa, flrat of ell» th«t
tfcM dootria* «xpoaBd«d nuot b« tb*t ot 9I« tlMMM r«th«v thut nf
privet* opittloaa of the «Raget«; ••ooaAly, ttuit thid dpotrlxt* anst b*
ikflwa to be St. IhMM* tnm tho t«cts brought fbr^i thirdly, thet tho
•saiast roadlae tuigr prooeaoolrod aotloaa of his owa lato tho lat«n>r*>
aay dlffaraat ooatoxts, oopplaaaatiae oa* text bgr the other, vihea a
polBt baa not at all ba«a treated by the ettthar. It la not laglttaKte
for the esaflate to attcBipt to fill la the esp9 with hla ova eoaeltuioaa,
takias perhepa oaa prenlse of the rg^iaBt trtm the oathor aad aappljr-
praaleea are tXrmk bgr the aathaar* It aeaaa peralaalble to dnar the
eoaolualoa that aaturally ftaUows fros then, erea theiuKh It w«s aever
eaylloltly drMm bjr the withor, but oaly on the eondltlcm that aathlag
bvaaifit fbrtli.
nmwm m
lottooo follow froa this. First, tix» yrogr ass ioa of his arguBMot in a
tSKts ars «iuotsd far tlis additiooua iafttOMtioB or bos point of vlov
ooBlatUa, arioso ttm. ouplatalag tost by toiEt, boomso ths first may
ooataia noro than oao poiat tluit aoods furthor dsvslopuaat, thaa tha
first tiiosgni flBfvord for this purpose Itsslf oomtaias ons or aors
kais itat point was orisiaiOlr bsing aaplainod. aoao Mozltia>lo sooqigpo-
loo aHst la soob saso bs found botvaoa follosla« tha land of tha toxto
OB th« oa* haxtd, and, <m th« oib«r, iapoalag « rigid a prloapl ord*r on
%b« ooaqproaiM wUl iBOTltably t»« 4«bat«bl« and Its momm «t boot
r«laitlv«*
hcmwwm Iwlaf th« tatwant nqr ba. rnxan, alaea tha «x{>IaaaAlaaa
«U1 naaaaaarlly ba wida in otbar tmrnm «han Xagla Itaalf , thoaa tanui
Iba t r a atoawH baa baan dlTldad Into tbraa parta* aaob aoa-
aba«l lagia bava baaa aawaliiad, Inoludlag both ebaelata atat waanta
af alMt lagla la or doaa, and ralAtlTa atataoHMKta about lagla lAda bjr
tnll. /«ad In tha third part thraa partioular klnda cor andaa of loglaal
logiaal balag*
«tao apholda it, rathav thaa of liaaiawiat, ite daeiaa or q[aaatlmia it.
PMMlftfll xll
has bMB f)»UjMr«d.^ Meet oft«B Itow «v« MMly eitad in tb« notas
•Img Witt other t«acta; or If thigr «r* quBt«4 in th« twzt. It Is umwOLly
with oth«r ptoretllwl psMneM* In th« tm plaOM in whi^ thigr ateiii hjr
f1gi—t iaptftda upon theet aloua, but tha taxta <tiMtail bafora or »fter
thaa ia tha urcMaaat aara aoffieiaatly eloaa ia a»aaia« fcnr tha dDotriaa
baan uaad, and diffarast ortho^ephy is fOllcwad hjr thaa, for tha acdca
to tbct of tha Paina aditioa of tha wadca (aa awiwaiatiP. iwagt^. jg^
iaotvM, aad jyet qyaatMn of thm Laoaiaa aditioa era writtaa aaiyrtlati e. j
vuqmbliabad worka whioh henra baaa of graatar aaaiataaaa than tmy pa9>-
Coura da Legidwi givaa ia tha yaar 1989 - 1940 at tha Inatitut d*i^udaa
ara due to rootor Aatoa C, ragia for hie aura guidaoaa, hia patianee
explicitly and aiMi what va oaa learn of logic from thaaa, at lanst regfard-
lag it* function and nature in gaaaral, llaia la our concern in thia First
firat chapter, we ahall ia the aeooad ehepter exNSine logie relet ively
explain whet loslo la, r^asm^ the ffv that do, the fullest diaoueaioa
duct Ion, not ao tsutki to the partloulsr votk at ha&d, but to ^e atudy
of logic aa & whole, nila oeeure before the oooneatary proper on the
LBgla aa an Art i
dlreot the aota of raaaon In Han. v.liar«aa brute anlmala have laatlnota
to guide their actlona, man haa reaaon. The waya in whloh reaaoa direeta
But reason itself aoat be gilded, And for thia a apeoiel art la needed.
direotlva of the vary eot of raeaon, ao ttjot in uaing bia raaaon matt
•taad tdiat ia maaat bjr art. Aijuinaa taaahaa tbet it ia one of tbe in*
oparst ioM, bat diffora txom art ia th^t it has as pvodaot barmi
tha BOtion itsalf
funotlOB of dlreetiag the oeta of reaeoa, aa h«a bean enid. /ooag the
Its utility oonaiata in the aid it givaa to the othar •olaoa^^ ead arte:
to tha way la ahioh tha thiaga ara ralatad to raaaoBt dt. IhaBaa oppoaaa
oonaldarcitioa OMkaa in ita owa aet, aa whn it ordara to oaa «aothar ita
taat plaaa r— ag tha aata of raaaoa whiofa lo^io atudiea, aiaea it in«
atarlMi."^^
glAPTt I ?••• f»
aad '*oratlOB'* alao to loglo, but it nawia onro likoljr that ho rathw
raapoetlTal;^, llhou^ tho works raaoltlns Aran thmtm qttBal*arta aro not
ticot frott tha ojraratioaa fren «hlA thagr ^prlag, eaA tbiaa varlfy to
tlMi nA ttim 4«flnltlon, rmey elwurljr IndlMt* that logle i« th* "mrt'*
r«f«arr*«i to. ::liioo thigr aro obriously not Mit«rl«l, aad aot «att«nMl
"Hi tmkm" (^sssre) is then sot reattrioted to tho waaalag tiui^ «aa dlo-
tlBjnlifcod tram *to do" (mare) , hut mmr ewi b* taken aa gyomaiUB
with "to do":
Viea losio ia aaid to afkm eoBMVthiagt the word ''Mdte'* ie not tdcea ia
the ebeolutely eoaaoA aeaa* whiah would identify it with no do", eiaee
•IrooAir quotod la vixioli it wao Mid that losio htm lo—thiBg of m pvo-
Iha foaaea giToa for tho diatiaotioa of liboral orta fvoa otbora aowa
at firat glaaoo to bo that tbo liboral arta prooood froa tbo aoul» tho
aon-Ubaral froM tbo bodr* ^3vt thia oeuld aot bo aineo orovy art pro-
oooda froB roaaaa aai baa ratio ia ita dofiaitioa. Ibo pradaat of tbo
roault of tho body. Tbo wowwing ia aot, bowovor, that thagr proeeod
fToai tbo body, but ratbor that tbOT aro ordorod to it. tbia ia bvooibt
out ia aoothor paaaago, ia nhieh tho ooa-libaral carta aro oallod aoabaai-
oal or oorviloi
erta ar* noblar than tho othora, atill thogr aro not ao atrietly ar^a .*^
Iba diatiaetion botwaan than aad the apaoulatiTO aoiaaoaa oftaa appoara
arir dim*
Tho tana art la, la foot, aonvtlaaa taaod rmj bvoadly} it iaoladoo
act OBly liboral nrta (ia ahiflb thara la atill, la a vagr* oom* produo- -?
aad Baw poisla out thalr pyapaor nawBiBgB, AiBtlacaliftiiac art, aalaeoa,
aaA wIbAob. Art la hara takan la ita raatrletaA BOBaa of ara aa>0^toa
Itraai tbia bxoad uaa of tha bmmi art, wo aoa thet, whan It la
Lofflo aa a 3oli
tbo fIrat loaa*a of tha HBMiwitafj ob tho larl ramaBOlaa^ aad IB tho
fMai tha flrat leaaon on tho »tbloa » ''Ordo cfuaa ratio ooBald«r«indo
«4 ratlonalMi yliilMWj^aaM.*^
ai kaam as woht
daf Inlte aubjeet or kiad of thlaga about «til«ii It glTaa oartala kww-
to othar soitnoM weulA thfow auiAx U|{bt apea hia eonoaptlon of loela
Claaaifioation of aeiaaoaa
B9imM99» If tha aeiaooa ia purauad tor tha adca of aoMO noirit or p(ro>
lativat
Ikm auhjact iMttar of tha paraatioal aoioMaa ia thiaga that «a aaa aaka
hf our o«B afforta; that of tha lyaottLetiTa* thiaga ttiat w da aot aaka
hat diaoovor:
Qm icltur oportMt BMtericA tiBl •a»m proportiMMfaH^
«f«rt«ft praotienrvB Miantlttnai DBt«Fi«i •••• r— tUtm
^M • loatve op«r« fiwi 9«Miwt, «t mow
mgoltto U
Of«r«tioB«B (joMil la flJMB oHilBari pOMlt. apveulati-
TaruB TWO MlaBtlMnw aBftirlaR opeortet mum rea qua* a
oDvtro Of«v« mm fiualt uada awpm ooiuil4«ratlo la
op«r«tloa«D ordlBorl noa potast aleut In timmt at
aaoaaait barua rmfmi dl|tlnotlon«i apovtat aolantlaa
apaottlatlTaa 41atl%al.^
bat la tha oaa aaaa tha kaoNladaa la aoiifbt f^r Ita mn aaka aad aothlas
boiag ooBMBtod or roforred to, alao roooiVM tbo necteos of first pbll>
'I
la tlxa long dlaouaalou of tba a»ttar fOuad la the fifth quaatloa on tha
•ad fMtiT* aelMOM mr aMPal philoaopbjr «iA «rtt <*Qnia aftls Miagitia
Of arat iTa, t«1 aat aatlTa t«I faotlTa,"^ tbla aiTlaioa la b»aad oa tha
Ilia aotiva aolwaaa asra aiao oallad aoral, and tha faotive, sMOtiHaloal
aa foiloawi
ap a ealativa
(tfaaoratloal)
ttataq^graiaa (flrat lAill-
aaaikr, tHaelacy)
Solaaoa
thooo pvodaeta «ro oartaialy aot aoctaoraal and OMtorial. Wo oaa aeoordr
iacljr t^lY to Xoftie tho axsuMaot ahitfx 3t« Ihawaa uaoa to ilMRr that
oaA oaa bo eaUod aa art by aactMsioa, atill, booaaoo it deoa not bavo
aagr aatooutinft pooar othnr tben tho intolloot, and no diatinet oxtaraal
tloal{ bat tho opwatioaa aro aot propaarly prodaetlTo. and thoroforo aot
dram In thla ooatCKl would Boaa to pat uadar Eiotlvo aelooeo tba
•thloat
•xaroaaioM •paratloaaa.
crparatloao ^p»9 BOtioaM dlouattiri alout
oat aelaatla UMralla*
eholoot
aot ««M«r»«d with ««ts of tha will tat with tteM of vmtmn.
If w« r*-MnMia» th« i—nntng of tbo tasm "aotion" as appllad
to aetlTo Mi«Boo, vo flat that St 4»a« aot apply to arwry liaa nant
SBnla aelaatla eat aat aotlTa, aat faatlTa, aut thaorloa, aequltur j^tod
• • • theorlca slt«^
CaAFCTR II Vrntpt fit.
obila MtetaMwt
lAgie la not oonaaniad with aatarial aribatana aa but with aota of raaaon;
it doaa not find ita objacta raa^jr-smda in aatura, b«t aakaa than: thior
of lacia hava thair baing only in tha ndnd, yalhaaat iea, furthanaora,
daala »ith qn&atity and ita vaopartiaa*^ B aaaaea lAgia ia net ooa-
part of it.
furthar on. For thia raaaan only a faw briaf indieationa will aoffioa
m* MMli laglo IMS la OQonoa with mmimifbfBio; tor It too do^lo with
Bst loftle la not ooaaaraad with aabataaoaa, with aaoldanta ranlly aslat-
tho oaa aad tha aaagrt o^" ^^^'^ bolag w^ptallf lad* but oaly with aeta of
raaaoa aad tha apaelal aatltiaa that arlaa froa thoaa nota. a furthor
aica that 3t« Tbwiaa ta^m aot Idaatify loglo with siatapfayalea la tha
•pooulatlve soionooa:
daaa aoka e plaaa for loglo* Thla oaavra la tha Introduction to tha
tha ralntloB whlflh tblaga that 99a ba wida tha objaot of aelviaa baw
to raaaon} aad tha four ordaara ara aaalc&ad to four dlffaraat aoianocMi:
ordor of tbla«a 'Htblob roaaoa ooaaldora but dooa aot BBko" oorroapoada
aeloaeo Ilatod flada ita objoota la roaX bolagi tho othora aako tho
bauatoda But aaothar olaaa raakalaa otwr la thla aow aab —a, glviat *
plaoo i^art to loglo. Xt dooa aot flad thlaga roadlMBado aad atudr thaa.
or aako «x%flraal thiasa miA atvUtir tbttlr ntklac) It ttttftl** !%• «&
•p«retloas ~- not thoae of ths vlll but tiio— of roaoea itsolf •
aro teldv firat, that logle la iatiyauctoty to othar aoleaeaa: " -uaataa
40
aaiaatiaa logioalaa," laatyuotloB la othar aelaaeaa raauiraa iirafrl-
botbro wo proeood, and oeaoot loam both tho aotliod a&d tho aattar of
aro about thlaso» not about aeionoo itoolf, Intorfrotina Ot, Dioaaa,
vo oaa eall th«D aatarlal . I<ocle, on tho othor hand, ia about aeionoo
I& ooBtraat wltb %U« fiifitarinl aolaaoM lagia aaa tea daal«B«taA aa
Mtrummt*! or aathoaoXagteaX
J aalaaaa.
rtwral aaiaaoa
Salaaea (^lyalea
SpaaulatlTa Uatli«setloa
(tbaaratloal)
Mataphgralea (flj«%
Iktarltd |liiiloaoph7a tbaology)
atlll thia la aot a hard and faat dlTialoB. wa aaw that losio haa a
It lat
habit:
art, not la th« atrlot aonoo of tho tarm, but taicaa bieatfly, Aa a eon-
aagr group of tho uaual oleiaalfloatloas aad booauao of Ita oloao ralar
loM la farther eomplleated by the fttet that loele Itaelf haa a apoou-
Plvlaloaa of Logle :
polate le the dlTlalone of logic* lliree parte of the aeleaee core die-
%iacalata«d <voeordlag to the %hr— aeta of r«eflo&>
Tiy third pert, daalias vith diseoraiva raaaoalag, haa in turn thraa
farta of ita am* Tba raaulta of raaaaaing tan ««ap«r«d to the vozka
•f aaturat aona aaoaaanrily foUcar upon tha natural pvooaaa aad aarar
fail to ooouT} ana* oaauv aoat of Hie timi ead othaora w fvaaka
to tha third:
ayllosiaao daaeaatrative.
ueeuado autan mtioaia proeaaaui daaarrit alia
para lagioaa, q(naa dieitur invent iva . Um
iarantia
9if9fm i
jif.
Pttg*
aad nub MPro £ro<;(ttaiitly rofarrod to. thagr ero ascplloitljr oaid to bo
diotiaet ooianeoat
aoBo baoio for thia diatinotion waa elroadjr iadiaatad idiaa tbo logio
for* deoa aot y«t poasoaa it, it oanaot st*Mrt out fna pnrtioular
Bia diatlAotioa batwoan tha thoory aad tha uaa of daaaaatrntlTa aeiaaflo
uaad.
QBjmm II F«s« M.
tioaa of tbo aoul, «r« oould argua tram tha gaoaraX pviaoipla tbnt
ooatrarlaa baloag to tho aama oubjaoti but lova, tha ooatrary of hntrad,
predication
plaeet
tea (^rinolplla) ; d«MMastretlVft aatMS, qua* ast jaAlaa-
tlTa, pxoeadit as proiprils,^^
la that dlalaotioa la aa laquljiy, and Ittqulcy haa aa Ita ala tba Ala>
tlTa 99lmm»,
aldara both aldaa of a quaatlon, tba pro aad tba eon, the efflnaotlTa
avar, baaaoaa ha haa alraa4y dlaaorarad the truth, ivopoaaa onljr ona
tioa, jtt«t BUS It amy awa tho ono who ntudiM tho tbooxr of dlnloetieo;
^^ ^•"WMrtratog ttoaa* oaIj tho oao wtw aokos mm of «ad opplio* A»>
BastmtlTo losio* it dooo not bmmhi ttko Xoflolu, boomuM i^o «•• of
dflHBotratlTo logio deo* not boloQ«i to loi(io, but only the thoory.
faro oaA ajipliod loelo, lot us rotura brlofly to aoto aaotbar tin-
sion of tbo lofile of roeomilag Wbioh ««• giTon la tho oourso of tbo
tisal roosoalag aaike use of tho ayllaciM ia gsasral, «id sro aoooa-
CB^yrt H ?•«• 3?,
eono«rn«d with tho third aet of tho Kind* But thio division is not
appliod to tho first and sooobA aots, sioplo evprcbausioa aad ittd9>
•f 3t« IhBwaa Aquinas is that «hi«ti is amda bstwaan ths doetriss and
tha uaa of logio, or, ns ws miqr ssyvass it, bsftvaao pwra and a|>pliod
Ike ssas distinotion is, in anothsr pes ssgs, applied to two parte of
la vhleh tb«Qr stoad to •udti otb«r; ^^Itod logio aakos uoo of tbo
tlOBS*
fast that it is aot a ssianss, bewsw, anOisd dlalootios aad tbe ass
aattort
C|Olff«l H Pest W9,
As a fw aaq ia«oa
[
> %ti«ra la a aUgla dlalaotlo, but thaor* ar« muvr da-
oaatrativa aelaneaa:
studiod, not with a Tiav to th^r oakiagt ^ut for siapla kaowladg*
of thaai
logio «rl%h what ««• aeld of logie •• aa art, wo ooo ttiat in rog^rd to
ita uoo logio la a t^ttaoiofaetlTo aolonoo or art, and looks to tho pro-
aad dswftstratlw lofilo aad batwosa ptsof aad appllad loglo is lapor-
nvlo Is ptortloularly tiuo «h«i tha tarn loigis ooeura la Its adTwrtolal
aai adJaotlTal fomst mvib as logloo. isodo logjso. par loaloas ratloass.
rathor frequantly oeour in tha vritlags of ^3%, HMwas, oftan aaod seas
"flqrsleaUy" (a^tuTttlltor )
>• 'Ok* taits 10ftlou< h«r« oaa b« tak«a Ia tb« vumuallfi«d •«&••,
psoaaaa la pradlcetioc:
tlio diraetion of tha ahola ooataxt toward tha uao of auob prlaelplaa
<8APT8R II f9^ 48.
•iMo th«y aro Mid to proeooA frwi Mowicin prlnelplos, Thla holi^tona
flgimtlYa a«iaa, ainaa tba p«rt la daalaaat ai bar tha aana of tba wbola.
JttfgMwsnt **f»as osMHoa prinolpleo «hiA ero aot japopsr to ttw dsaoastra-
•psksa of hsro aro tho sans as "osswoa* rsasoas. That tba sair sss ioa
logisas St ftwwmas ia aot dis JaaetlYs but Qonjaastivst tbs two words
aiswiitag tbs sesis thiag« is olser fpoai its bsine oontr»stsd with inmpsr
this elsor:
iMgs to 1«8&« u « whol*. [Jilt thar« Is quftvtion h«rtt iMt 9t th» ttudy,
Umtlaltlva , "*!& tha omumht of locle** aoeorAla^ly aeana "In tha bmuummt
qwtadi «a fiad f «irtbar arldanoa that tba aotom loataua la that of dlft-
laatioai
la aapt&ao da aobatan-
Feat<|BMBi daft«mittanrit s^tiUoaopliua
^^* »*» togjo* oonaldaraa* aalUoot doflaltioaaB ail
partaa daflaitiotila, at alls hajuaendl, qttea aaomtdnm
ratlMMai aoaaidaraatur; la boo Uboro o«tat» iataoAlt da
aanalbiXlbiu oabsttrntila datanslaara par pvoprie prlaoi-
pla, appUoaado aa quaa ittp«riua iaqulaita suat logiea,
ad mbotaatiaa IXles.^
la aaw oa edo laglao aad lodioa «V9 oppoaad to that phvaaa, thagr lawt
aaaa "dlaiaotioally.'*
paaaafta last (jiiotad oooura, Aq^alaaa gaaa ea to aagr that 'vlatotla doaa
ad ras aaturalas aslotaDtaa." Doth tha feet that "what vaa said «ieoord-
logjloo aad logloa, oad Ita balag oontX'jstad with ttia epplleetloa of
dlalaotloal oas.
CBAPTW H fm^ 46.
than, wo Boot roallBo tbat th«PO aro two kliUUi of lodo, ^sro and ap-
pli«l« ^'ure logie studloa the l&otraeanta of thort^t noodoA lay tho
otbor oeioaooo and tho siotbod by idiiib tboy will oonduet their denoa-
it ia plaood aaoat then; bat aot in full right, ainoo the alad does not
ereljr dlaoorer what it atudiea, but both ankee and finds it. It is,
soienoo. It does aot itself apply its priaeiploi to tbo antter of the
ead has ao pert in applied logie. But tog&o deoo partioipate in tho
••aelvuiioiw, fhM* e«a b«Ip %t» oth«r •«itao«« t« mm th« wqr to %h«ir
ticatloa of tho othaar salaoeoa in this way. Thara era both thaeratl>
ia Itaalf & aal«iao( implied dialoatlao dooo aet fiaflU tho roqulro>
Tha anhjaot matter of loglo haa tho aana astenaloa ao that of aota-
Tka fsot thet tha aawi attbjeot I0 oonaon to both solaaoas sad that
this l8 unlT«r»al loada to tha uaa of n oonsaon aathod for tb« hiciA-
fsvallals arm polatad out. 'Uxo first of thasa Is tha study of ooatra-
rlss, sMb aa to sbav that oontrMy things balonc ^ ^^« MB* sslanoo,
Uataplqrslaa aad dialaotlas both ooasldsr oontr«noat
tmtlft aad falalty ara tha eoaoflra of aartaylgralaa aad that ^agr ara tha
aalaylqralaa MMt aoaaldar falalty •• «oXl «• truth, <<t tha aaaw tlao
It la aald that tha atudy of tha trua aad tto falaa pfopcrlj baloaga
II 9mg» ao.
Tba attribution of tbia atuctiir to loglo la ooafixsiMML tgr tha fnet that
Ihe ooai^oaltion tAd tlvisloa spokan of hatro la, flrat of cdl, tha
than, ara Hllka in tbaX thagr ^f botti ooaoamad vith truth and fulalty.
selanaa, aan aora profitably b« laft for dlaeusslon letar, after tba
phyaloa aad lasia ara tl^alr dlffaraaoaa. Ihara ara aavarBl taxta of
CRAPTTO II Pa«t 81,
loiaie aad iavtaptiysles* l<b« first at tbos* oceurs 1& tb« ooonntury oa
tlo» aai aophittloa bctT* th« aaBMi «xt«iuiloii »• miitaphyslcs, ::^, ntoans
Althottfljb tba aabjaat of logio h<ia tba aana axtatisioa •• that of iaate>
tba uaiTcrea and doaa not aaka {ea ia aaid in tha baginning of tha
eartain iutwutions of tham, »bl<^ aaist only la tba caladt nnd thaaa
belags will be atudiad a little further on, Dlian tha subjeet whialh
Bava acaia ara atatad tha aqttality of aitaaaiaa of tba two aoianaaa
a«lTaa, aaaordiag to idiot ia nnimi ia than. Logia too daala with what
ia aoMoa to all tbiaea, but not with tha thiaaa thanaalTaa or lA^t ia
ia th«B{ rathar with idiat ia anamna Jg, thw, that ia, with tha intan-
tiaaa idiidh ranaaa fm» of thaa} aai aiaaa iataoAiaaa aaa ba fataad
taxy oa tha Bttiiaa. «h«ra tha ordar with which oataphyaioa daola la
Botapbjraioa SMOt stutiy tha aot of boiag through tho boiaga which watrnt-
eiaa it. <nx«a aatasfeyaiea atudioo tbia^a ia tbair rolation to tbo aot
of axiatanco, wharoaa logio daoa aot atudr thiaso at ^1, but only th*
ooatoxt it appoars, taMrorcr, that «Ki»tOBtia raroa 4»m sot ooaui b«ro
pr««iMly tea eat of baLjUff, totrt rather thioffli in tha tr ra«l b»t^ or
tliiii0S ea th«Qr ava ia raaXitjr, a* vaa aaid ia tha worda <iaptaA twxm
tha daataaa— I "raa aMttaioM anm OMa," Tha eaB«>&l ooatast ia thiat
thia iBvaatigetioa h«a ba«a pvrattfad lagJaaXly. fron tha wagr wa apaak
%li« logiolaa la t«nn of euosr on* of th« four obimm, Wh«th«r latrlasle
nto lof^lelaa might doflao a tblng» cuad thus doslgaato its quiddity, by
aaadag Its porpoao, far ths aaliqjiiiyslolaa that nould not bo tho quiddity
but tho flaal oottoo« tdiitih la oxtrl&sle to tbo thln«{ oaly tbo formal
aad BMterlal oauso would oator Into his dof Initlon of o aaturnl thine*
**ros suaptao sooMiritaa oalotontieia saan" or sesw siMb yliraso ablab shoos
%ku% th« point uad*!' oonfilder^^tloii lo mt tbe cet of exiat«kiio« tctkin
tgr lta«lf , but th« things whloh tswoln* tirnt oiflt. tmA «h««« pr«eiMly
of our thoueht} la oth«r words, r«eX tliia««, aot Ja«t owntsl boisgs.^^^
Thl» text, tti.«a, dOM aot »a^o ««y distlaotloa bfftw««a loele ctad awta-
thmm^ it doM brlii« lato relief ooae preblMM iibl«li wlU hsre to b«
nraai theoo teste we e«e ttet for St. Ihaneo, nltboui^ le«lo
th^r aro ooaaldered tqr the bui»ia silad or not. loeio, oa the other
aa aoajBOT of toaic
to St. "nioau Aqialiuui, vhloh loglo troats of, otudloot aad aoolyooo.
la tho t«Kts jiut 80«i iu tho Xaot Aoytor. la f^ieh logio waa dio>
pfaraat ftm asaa of tba texta alrao^K (pwtad* £• asplftiaa that tho
aubjaat of a aeloaao la ttiat of idii(fti tha eauaaa sad pgopar tlaa aro
danta, aad alao baoaaao tboao aeoldaixta turo px^elioatad of it. Iha
habltuiU*'
vluit thm objaat of loglo ia, vo aoo tbat aooMftlstaa the e-eta of roaayft
aonaidort
Lagla not oaXy wdcaa aaa of raaaea, aa Ao ell aolaaoaa, but it treata
oparatlcmat
tha natoafl oparstlm oclblaaa what la thua aiaply girwfA to fosa a aalt
out of thalr tnoltlpllolty. n^le aaaaaA aiMtratlaa la hara gXttm tha aaa*
tleal pwrpaaaa tha taiimlaal tatm naad to Aaalgaata lt| tha aaooafl
UMudly r«MlTM %b« doublo titl* of "ooo^pMition ttad Alirlslon". It 1«
«9lalB»4 that th« first op«ratl<m 0mmp9 cai kaov« qulddltiM or th»
qttJA fit of thlBga tod that tho soaMid puts togsthw tL« q,uiddltl«s
jtticMBt rospsstlvoljr.
proosss froB t^a knoioi to tba unkaoan. tha ordsr whlob la polntad out
naads ths ssoead as b prarsqulslts. and ths ssooad rsqulrss ths first,
«rt VM. ^
haM (^panitto • q|aibtas4Uw AieiWr iatwt-
Mf%lo lAt«Ile«%tt« slTs Uneinatio per int«llaetun.
• • • atemadt two op«r«itlo lixtellactuB e«t oon^otl-
tie v«l dlYlalo i&telXMtufl, in 'iun wrt Jsen TMniB at
falMn« • • Tairfiua Taxo aatua r&tlonla a«l aaaoadm
Id 4uod aat pvoprlwa r«tloaia, aailieat dlaauxrara ab
«» in alittd, ut p» Id quod aat notoi davanlat im
«9«id$imMa icM%i.^
ia rafarrad to aban tha aoiaptia tim tmimi ia apokan of* but e braB«b of
B«t, aa wa bcva aaaa, it rasarda tbii«a aot aa tb«gr ara ia thair raal
csLKpfm in »i«»tt.
«si«t«ie«, Imt ooly la tti« b«iag wbteh thagr her* 1a rmaoni "(Est) mut
tnrnw liMt losla la •aaaamad wltlii "Xm aat duploxt «ui oellloat ro-
h«t tHa lafeallaet la aeaaldarlag raal balaoa alaSwrataa thaaa froai aliat
It flada tharat
aaa that tha lataatlwui ara "fouad" la tblacat baaaaaa that la acx-
«90a tha Tloa whl^ raoaaa haa of thlaga. It auat mma that raaaaa
alAora"} aad thU Maaaa that aa tha lataUaet loaka af thlaga It flada
la «li«t tb* ba«l» for «h« rim wbi(dx it ftim of thorn.
CMMs, flq;>ooio«« oafl "tlM 0—tw ry"; a aloo tbio doftttitioa, tho pcopeoi-
and aaooadly. l«elo !• tha oaOy aalittea atiiflb la aoaomiad with thant
Altboiiijti It U aald la thla faaeaga that logia doala with tha aata of
lofla ba ra«oaeilad with tha atatanant that tha aota of ra- aoa (iT0 tha
nttiooat* b«iiic, atti thiaet •• thigr mf in tli« mtaft trm r—lX/ th«
MM* tblac* • ^'^* (t^s of tb« nlodT 9higr m» luurdly ba ld«itloal with
th« Mt« aiJio* thaar A»Uaii upoa th* ««t«t "ooMldareticmaai ratlo&ia eon-
PrSaa «! intallttetb
sunt raa «xlm eadMM, la
Intallaetua latelllccada fartur* "aaunda
qgaea parinD
•K%aM latallaota dleuatur latontlasaa aoaaaqiaaBtaa
latallls«idl.S4
Wwthaeiaor; lafeaatlona are pxoduata of tha aata, i»o% tha aata fhaar*
WkilM ayaa mU^t poaaibly baw tha waaaiag af oparatloa la thla aan-
«r% WM ttuil tlMT* is in Mn» mam * pxoaoAl «lil«li 1> dlatiact ftraa
to tbo t«Kto «lkiflh oteto tluit logic is ommmvwM wi^ tho sots of roesoa
•bA mm if MUQT roally aoMVt tiiot ««to bto tho atdijoet of logio. Iho
^'^9X0 is soa e w— a with sots or troats of tbsm in sons wsjr* hut ths
that ths subjoets of ioeio aro tho syllogiSB, tho proposition, ths
tioass ratioais,? it ia not said that sots srs ths subjset, but laarsly
that tiktif ttem ia sons wagr eoaasotod with ths sub Jest, ^!.lrsa ths pro-
ducts of ttots "partaia to" ths aots, Hhsn ths soasMntarir oa tho ijthios
says that tha ''ordo quci rt tio froit in croppip ectu" bsloogs to ratio-
bslaag to logis, b«A tho Sjrdsr ia than* This is sxpXaiasd ia ths tsxt:
ssaelusioaos." Asssrdiag to this ths thiaos ordsrsd ars aet ths sots
pwl sss, aad seaslusions.** It Is ttisss whish ths taxt raelly aasi«as
1b« aecl IqpoDrtast %«art teaXias witli losio «Ad te« aeta of
with tkm ^svatlsa of fonlas lotsatlMS ratbar than with tka latantlons
sm aire 4]r tnwmA, But this Is M»t a dsslal that logle dsals with la-
twstlonas It svsa Implies that n^sjMA Alrests ths ast tor the saks of
aai tlM sf fat lsa Is "^roiptar oyus."'^ MhMH, hoirairair, w« asst la ths
'
lostflag pamgvaiih ths statanaat that Isisi* i« *olrya Ipsnm aotqa
a»»tt<r do atst asaa the sans thing as thv are applied In our tippflrantly
Aa art «o«ka upaa a asttar and ''dliq^oaaa tha amttme" tqr latroduelag
a fioani ia*o it.^ !<• oaa eonoluda tram thla. It aaaaia, thnt aata of
vaaaoa arm what losia a» ea art vofkc tqiottt tha quaalr-produata ra-
aaltlng firoa tha Uyoaitlon of fonw upoa tha aata ara tha intantiooa
datuil rurthar oa, it will auffiea to ciaota oaly oaa tact at thla
attar of logio Tiawad ua aa art, tmt «tia w^h;jaat of logic na >^ ^uKai-
haa aavaral maaaiaMt •*• o' whioto ia hroed awMMKh to iaoluda *'aattar"
othar aaiaoeaa:
Mlsao* fra& all otb«c«» !RLis i« «zplftln«d iqr * mm^trimu with th«
Zk tba ooatiaaatioa of tbia paa aaga tboaa ara eritieiaad «bo aoaftuM
is, with tha fomal aapsst undar whidi all thoss thiass ava eoasidaradt
•swMaB q,«Mi soasldavastttr*', baseusa all tha thiai^ whioh ara toatarially
appliad to logio, wa sss that tha a«ts of rsasM, idxiib ars oonsidarad
tantions*'*
asts and intsntisns of rsason, 0ns of ttisss was tha nuinsr of pradi-
r««10Bi«")t^ tettt «luit la«i« is Mid to olMiAar is not so stMb th* set
itsolf M %h* sods of tho oot or tho A*t«nla«tio& «hl«h tho sot vo-
legie:
It is oloor fTCSi tho oentoxt, hosow, that, tbo«# tho stndir of i»ro-
roforrod to loftie nooording to its sodas (** B S»un di w q^uod . « . ost par
tutioa** aow aoat fvaquantiy doaa not oaan tha aat of oo&atltutlng but
«Mrt aiiioii ia aoastittttodt and ia Latin "ifaaaatio'* aaaiia not only tho
kind of intantion.
ara tha Tiaaa «hioh raaaon takaa of thiasa or ^o wajr In vhiob wo eon-
ooiTa th«i. In part at laost, thaa, ttxa Muaur of pradioatiafi( and la-
of baiag tho aubjaot of logio. Ttxm tram and tba faXaa ara a«id to ba
raally axistiaet vvas lass doas it oonsidsr tha aat of axiatanoa itaalf •
Aa4 yat tba tffaa and tha falsa ara Oafinad by tha asistaiisa or non-
thair aot of balnc (*ns sasMiiaM smbb mmar)^ aad tha truth of thlaca
phyaiaa la ast asawaad with tha txua and tha falsa; thaaa or a in
Q^fsrm in v«8« 78.
tk» alad, Bot la thiags} «Ad %hm Mlaao« tvhloh atudlM r««l thlaga ••
tbigr arc outald* of tha ntaA doaa not Invaatleeta tho jirlaoipliM of
of aa aharad la hgr all thlnga and aauaad bgr tt&a aauaaa of thlaga, ao
that tha acienaa vhloh atudlaa tha raoat biialo e«uaaa la e»at trua,
ftiM la Bot tha truth i«d«h U aaid to h« la tha hoaaa aiad, hut tha
ptajraiea, Juat aa angr apaoolatlTa aoioaoa la ooae arnad with th«t truth*
Oma :^« Thaaae aaya, thea, that aataittyaloa la tha aalaaaa of truth
darily to tho hvRD&n, ?br tho diriao iatoiloot waaauaraa tbo boing of
tho thing* oad tho thiag bgr oadLatiae oonftoiMa to tho dlvlno Intalloet.
tho thing Miasiirss tho htsaaa intoUoot, end tho oonfoxnity i^ioh ro>
It ia prinerily in thia aanae that being and the true are soextSBSiTO
differentiates the true fros being. Dut the aotual oparatioa of hanan
sat the wtities wbieti they torn within thtasAToe as the exivessisa
m*rp^ "^ ^* '»•
•f tt« things kumm is ast lui mult «itl;i& %hm porariiMe of "th* aslsBo*
ths truth of JudCBSBts sad prsposltioas, tmd propositions mto tho oon-
oom of logie,
tho study of tho tiuo cod tho faiss is tho truth of tho JudSMUts mA
prepssitlsas fWsd ^ tho htoaa latSllsst, iiaos jvdgsaat is aa aot
of ths alBd, its truth is la ths alad, aot la things* Tlxm oontoxt of
Sst oaly is it said that tho trus sad ths falss of uhleh thsrs is <iass-
Aad lat« la tho saas Isaosa tbo aattsr that has bosa uadsr disousslsa
sad tho falss ia ths husMS iatsUsst, and of tho hawan seiaaoo of logie;
sad that 3t. Iheaas is ksopiae this smm polat of Tlsir. Tbs trus vhieh
eit In roferrlns tho truo end tho falso to Judflnoat and tho psopooltioa
Iha tvua with vhieh lo^io la omoamad ia, »eoo!rdlBely« e logieal in-
aoo aoro fully in Choptar Till. Logie la not oonoornod with tho
bttt elao in tbo oos&itlon of truth from th« point of vioir of ooenltloa,
in o«r roffEird and aiutl kind of thins* i** pveporly kaow.^^ The auaation
it a eat of knowing.
logieol truth daponda upon tha baing and aon-baing of thia«^, tha atudy
Mao tbiag to study tho bolac of thlago ond, eoowliig tholr boias* to
r«f«r aaaothias to thooo rocO. bolaso. Lodo dooo aot oako ttio wdo-
onljr ooaeorn of logio with tbo atot of bolus Mmroiood bjr rool thlnga
fROt that tbaj h«ro tho uet of roiOL bolafi. In thla roapoot »o aoo a
eortbla ainilarlty with aeturd phlleaofiiqr, whioh dooa aot study tho
aot atudyiag thaaa rael thlnea but only tho roletioaui abieb tba idiul
76
aaitabliahoa to tbiafs aid tmmm thaao ralntioaa thanaolvoa.
whet tha thiasB avo of whitfa it fozaia intvitiaaa, and eoaaidar only
aliieh tho iatontiana are foraad alao «tar into ita ooaaidarntion?
thiafa that ara to ba haowa era oonaidarod tha aattar of tbou4iiht« aad
r
thm MUUMT Mi4 ordor la iftiioh tb« objects of tboug^it iv« dlspoasd ar«
thoiid^it, flftd aaothart oellod anttrletl lot^io, whieh takes iato noeount
booidos tho fom of tboutfkt gIoo its ooatont -> tbo thlags wbleh are
loslo of 3t, fbamm hes tbeee two ports, or whether he treets legle
Ylew, fom aeeas the node and disposition of tlMmight, ths iWMn ead
betweea thMit Better aoene the thlacs whieh ere kaowa ead almtt irtiiflii
loclam sMde.
Eve tlie Itom of the qrlletim «)ppllee to the relntloa of the propo-
sit lefts aad eoaolusloa aad is truly a fora of thovi^ti the aetter of
%hm nylXogiai appliwi to th» kind of proposttUoM roXatoA.
But this 1« aot tho nwaiag of "twnT whta St. Ibaaaa Mora
that l«gio teal* witl; "fotaal- prlnelplM,** B« doM BOt, lu the first
that loftia teala with as foms of tha adad, haoeaaa aathaMitiea ia aot
««aeoraa4 onl/ with feanw of tha adnA tat with thlas* riawad in tha
diatia#d«had« But tha aoat Isqfiortaiit eaA aoat partiaaat raawMi agaiaat
ikowa that He eaanoti nature ia froai Ood juit as reeoon ia; but Ood
aaanot «p«rata aoottanay to tha prisoiplee of htmnn raaaon (ao that genua
attar of that aan to ragala ali^t, B«l loglo la not aonoaraad vlth
dataradnad aattar; only with tha dataanaiaBtlea ablA eoawa from twm»
doos not #sp«i4 asrsljr oa « fovm of tbo SMSlal BO^f prodiootittia tk«%
Is, on ths sisrs fact of its bslag s jrodiosto to s sttbjoct, but oa tho
sutilnf of t]io sobjost and prodleate, aaA thsrofbro oa tbo tblags ths^r
rofor to. for tbio roosoa awttor, as it was Aofiaod abore, is iBVOlTsd
aad that tbo prinoiplos of locio ero takoa fvaa tboso ftMrmnl prineiplost
Haro aipla tho foxnal prineiplao la quostion aro not tioso of tbo aiad,
tho tbiass dopaads oyoa ^sa. Ihis ia booauso th^r nr* dsrivod tram
nia aliola parposa of thla text la to abeir thct gama and apaalM ara
darlTad froai fi»mL, not trwa aattar* :>aA alnaa "fonaal prl&olpla" la
or apaelaa, fonwl priaalplaa ara aaaooletad wltb fom and not witb
xBfittar (taking laattar In tba j^aleta aanaa, and not in tha tranafarrad
fnm the foxmt and that luaana, of ootoraa, fren tba fana of tba tbing
oaly ia tho foz» of tb« tblacf a&d onlj tbo aotural iiblloaopbor otudioo
tbo MttWt
Logie, thla nakoo luito oloar, lo aot ooooagraod with owttar in tho
tha vholo baiac ia quootioa io aaido \tp of ito fraaal and natorial
tho a«M thiag aa aattor, aa ia ahoaa by tha f^ot that thogr aro eon-
tv««t«(l to toxmntX prlaelplM Jiut •• iaB%t«r is. ni* nmifurimuk of th«
ttor of his HTtifaot, nnd tL« eootriMrt Ea4« of th«u to iMittor ttoam
tbfit %hw If «MWltf«ar«d to bo tho foxau /vt tho mmm tin* tbo forml
not aanotly tho ««• aa tho foiM is tho osoloaiiro ooaao ia whioh fom
la oppoaod to Battar, tn^ thay ab^tnsot tnm usr p«irtiettl/ir nsttar,
and aro th«raforo roolly tho oano ao tho foim ondarstood with an ordor
iadivldUBtiag aattw and loolco et thinoi only froM tho poiat of t1o»
tholra dorlTiog fraai tho f»m{ 1»it wo may not eonoludo that logio ia
foanaal ia tho ooaao that it di«rot<'rdo thinso aad otudioo oaly tho
but dooB aot roatriot itsolf to that; it tOao otudioo tho ttiia^si
whioh aro put into thooo fonw, ead it dooo thio fowaally. otudjriag
th«B froM tho point of Tiew of thoir foras. Thua tho diatinetioa
oMaaMNi of thiasa f^xa tha aubjaet imieth tha aaianaa of logie atodlaa,
JNi* i^«
••Ml t]i»t 3%, Ttuamem /^<}ttlAM t«e^M tbat th* i»rop«r •ubjvot of logie
Also 8&v*B &« th« aabjoet of logle w«r« tbo taedM of ;ro41eetloa aad
tbo tfu* «ad tho falao. As w«s alrsttJtf larlefly Indloetod aoA as will
b« sbowa snro fully ia Cb^ptar VZII, thsss art both roally intaatioas,
bslae* \m% raally ess aaA %hm •«>•• Logie is said to Oaal with ra*
to ifti«i boiag Is flfokw of, tbnt la to oagr, tbo 4iff wwt Hodoo of
tmm oooMitisl bolag or bolng is ita own right («»• J2«r m) • lb* I«tt«r
Ml. rool bolat, 8« MHitol toolas, «•* 9* •<H««I oitd potmtlal bolagi
no a aaa nd aodo of bolag jggr ao, that whloh la only la tho mind, la
otlMT kaikd tho wholo bolas of i^nt la thou^t of, vmxy bo dorivad freai
tho aiapla f^et that it ia nuado th» objoot of tboui^t. IMai tha
btxt It adds tha ftarthar aata of balng tha danlaX of what aturald ba
Im a clvan subjaot:
It la avldant aot oaly from tbaaa tazta but froia tha vary
Ita notion or daflnltloa, the other uhlob eotuelly doaa not hnra v9iiX
Tha «o«d baiag ia takaa fraa tba aat of baiae or aiiatiaft,^ aad naaaa
that whiffti lu»a tha aat of balag ("Elui dioitur quaai h^aaa aaaa"),*^ or
i*oaa aat ia to ba ("saa ioitur aat oujua aatua aat aaaa"}.^ I)ut a
retioMta baias (ana r«tioaia ) , by ita vaiy aotion doaa not hATo baiag
aaaa la tha aat of b^ag, A^ptiaaa llata, aa tha flrat luid waakaat,
aoa 00% ana la rarm aatura, aoalpltar ut a&e la ret lima, uzida nagetioaao
a vasy taouoiw olaltt upon tba tltla of bolas If thw t^otv* *V at all.
Eo« than OAB tb«v ovo« bo tbon^t of? Hot only la balac tho fl««t thlag
It lo tba u^aet vadav wbleh all thlaco avo wpff iliaBd adi
taUaati
ordar of natura, v^athar tbay &f pura flatlona auob aa unloorna «aid
«a MMt kaov anafe tbinca aaaHiaa or aitbari and aa tbagr mat ba balnga
m
am
dloltur d* bob asto, aawuiw «Md
Pllqiioiifta
ana aat apprabamua ab Intallaata; oada. • •
dlait Fliilonptaa, qm« mcatlo rml prlTotlo aatla
uBO BOdo dloltur acMi{ uada «tl« Tlaanaa dlolt. .
• qiwd DOB petaat forawrl mmtl»tlo
alal da auta,
^Ub oportait lUvd da q/io fvopMltlo fonsatur. •••m
laam aiib l&talXaotui as quo patat }UOd obmb
aat allcjuo mdo am.SS
HiTBgfi «• oaaaol q»«ak of ttbaelut* aiMk-b«lag, th« rmry
fftot that w* do «o&o«iY« atti qp««k of nAtat dooo not notuelly axiat lo
bo eallod boinga.
its adotoooo «iBd ito ootual intoUigibility froa tho oparstloa of tho
iatolleot:
thoai^tt t>ll sueh Utlags anr bs bslag In tba saseadazgr ssoss as vaXI,
Bat the ooatraxy is not trus; not all that «xists in thotight exists in
aature:
la reality are set beiacs la the Mae ssase as tbfoss things which here
real scstaraal aaisteBoe. That is shy t«a diffaraat aaoses of belag ere
distin«ttiShadt
that loftie ia not oo&oamad with baini; in tha first BVuBm, but oaly
with baias ia tha aaeond aaaaat it doaa not ooxwidar thinsa which oKlat
tbou^t which tiariva their axiataaaa froa baine oonaidarad tmd hera
their being, not in ranlity, but in tha adnd. Gut tha tiuaatioa now
ths dsfinition of ths ssooaA kind noa-sxistsBe* doss aot sstsr, Tb*
hsiaif? Ths first klnd« it appssrs, mast bs sonludsd fron logie. Ths
•SB* soismss. Ill* soisnss th«l dmlm with bsiag «s sueh BMtat thsn
«• mmt find th« •ubjoot of logie, tb»t la, caMBg tbos* tNilnes whiofc
thing i^icb tb« AMM BltfUfiM ("I^nnitio eat ratio qufln signifioat
Iftunfted in Heality t
^^* 8<Ptaceee tybich dieeuaaen the tEteaaiag of aenea. ifo find that naoea
ted hare exiatoaee independently of bnnw thouf^t, vnA other* esiat only
in our thought} but of the lattw aeae »tz founded on nothiot; out aide of
Ihnmtit «•€ ethere bHYo r> fbundation in reetlity thougix the beinga than-
«aap«l«ie« of Ittsie. Fton tha other two, than, IOt'4c Bust tt^ke its
dlatoly rael,
araaturaa of tha odnA aaaa rathatr far ranovad from tha proaaie and
eonaaomad with* >«d tear oan thara ba aiqr aoianaa of suoh fiotiona
trua praniMM wXaM tbara ia awM raeX net of bains whiab glvaa foun-
tbar rra aonthlne raeX fdUiag within tha OQaq>a*anea of tha philoaophy
duetion of tttaaa pura fietionat for it ia not &«/ uaa whataver to v?hioh
raasaa aagr ba put that thia Art rcgulataa, but tha uaa of re»»9on to ita
t
balBc of tha ttX thloc ia tha aooaa of truth la tha Intallaett "UhAa
dlao quod Ipaun «Mf ral aat aauiM Tarltetla sacuaduoi c^tod oat la
Jaat of lotilo vlth tha type of ratloaata balag whleh haa ao foundation
la roBllty but to plaoa it vith tha typa whlab tea a raal foaadatloa.
aqplaa ara ^^sivaa of baUga whi^ dariva thair fonaal aaaalittttloa froa
tha oparatioa of tba iatallaet but laf baaad upm ra«Iity} thoy aro
tiaa &Ad truth. Iba rafareaea to Intantioiui and spm^lim raealla tba
tast saaa ia tba praoadiag abaptar wbioh aoet olaarly daai^aatad tba
rMdity. MX amm aablsuity atill retmiixa 1& this elaM b«onu0« bMiA««
th« iutwitloii of i9>«olM w« find maamnm%9A thmtm tnitii s^ad %la», fron
vktat ««• •Bid ia ClM||itfr III tlNnit th» ooao«ni wtiioh lo^ i« ha« for th«
%ra« fuul tlL« f«li>e« it do** not •««» too a«arp(Fi«liig to ••• truth hero
But tlBO wottXA aocK «• h«ro littlo to 4e with tho tinoloos foraMd eoa-
oeoordiaftljr look for oono cXftrif ioatios of tho olooo of holofio whi^ <b
aot exiot OS mutt io ro«lity yot haTo « roolL fMmAotioa, ia erd«ar thet
aBBOxHJSmSKBBBmr
Do flai oaoh holp «ad olovifiootioa ia oaothor tost tnm
tho i4WttoBooo , It io «ry oiiailar to the ono fron Piotiaetioa 19 whioh
li«ht oa thio third oleoo, r«aoTO ita snJBiguity, oad givo addod ooafirao-
tioa to tho plaoiag of tho oubjoet of loeio horo, fhio paooago io foanl
itoolf t «d ia thooo wbiflh aro aot proporly dofiaod, eo tho highost do-
aova, it is tho gsasrio aotioat it dooo aot aosa tho ooaooyt whioh tho
^•«* loa.
ii2tttll«et hhm of thiui^, but th« ikiags sisalfiaA by thm eotte«pt. !%•
Aad tk«a throo waya la whloli the ooaeopt staada to the extoraal thlag
are dlatlagolihed:
tha order of tba aaooad nad third Itana la lavartad. But la tba latter
for the dlff«r«ooa la tha flrat eXaaaaa: la tha oaa eaaa ttia raal sad
tlM eaaeapt whlah la divided, aad therefore the alsa rather thea what
plete raaX belag; aad that ndiich doea aot eodet la exterael reality
lad, Mkee Ite firet elaaa thoee which h«we a raaX fauadatloa, aad oaa
that la SaaMdlate or proxiatate} aad the aeeaad claaa, tboae which have
aadar the third elaea of the text prevloaaly etadied. lh«re» bealdee
leeieal iatentiona. tnrtli ead time were Hated na hariag a real foun>
araa tram thia tact, whlcli aaya tlust tba iatantiea itagua la attrlbutad
It
tha «lMraetar of truth, that la, tha true tiican iMtarially, but tba
01st. 19t
azlatlas outalda tha alad, auah aa aap . wbloh ORusaa tha latidlaet t«
ba trua:
99Ui aora ao» boaesiaa tzuth la by Ita nutura tha f Irat ooeiparlaen of
ift aatioA but to ba oooatltutad fonnalXjr bgr tha oparatloa of tha miad
ia tiaa, aad aatloa ia ia tha ordar of raolit/, aot Jxurt ia tha ordar
flPFfHF p«8« X07.
what fbUows iMosAletsly upoa notion, but by what roXlowsd upon ths
follsar IsBsdletaly upoa tbls aods of p«rssptlsa sad oaly sadletaly upon
mtlca, aad thus would bs Ilka loelsel Intsotlons, that Is, a ssooad
Intention (as will bs siQ>lalasd la ths nejct <dispitcr}. But tins Is ths
Bind* a asaaiirs, aot of ths wtgr notion Is parsslysd, but of ths wcqr
sst SBS aoblls"} nad ths propsvtlss which ftollov upon ths sub Jsst ("ss
sllBlnats tins fran ths typs of ratloaats bsias whl<£bi bslmig^s to lotjlo.
at ths first class, rsal bsiag, siass that had nlrsady bssn sllmlnstsd
ss ths sttbjsot of logic In ths first part of our Inquiry* Ths ssooad
olass, pars flotloas without any foundetlon la rsallty, did not ssrl-
sagr othsr sslsass, That Isft ths third olass, balngs hsrlae thslr
Xlalt tha flald iaOleatad in thla third olaaa, foundad uaraal haiag, wa
eaUad to our aid tha aamaftat parallel tazt of Diat. »• Iba elaaai-
fiotioaa* vaa Blra«dy ahowa not to partaia to ovr ivoblaa, But tha
apaeiaa ware aeen to belcmg in tha aaoond elaaa of thia nm text, tha
whiOh vaa oeaa in the firat part, the dlaouaaioaa of the aasM anttcv in
the text of Idat. 2 reoalla the aaw paaMna OMah aove atronftly baoouae
tioa, from the ooHnantaxy on the fourth book of the yetephyaioa . vaa
thia!
Xa Di«t« 8 «• rmAt
aad it followa upoa our oaaaar of undw^eadlag the aactarael reel thine*
that the a«ne thing la helng referred to. Therefore It la the subjeot
the fomaar. The taact froci Dlst. 8, howevw, aakoa thla advaaoe oror
legio to thi« «ct«at tbat w« obb Bty the.% it is that typ« of rationats
boliiB whiflb hsa a roEaoto fouadatlon in tho rosl. la tb« oourss of this
ariooa froa and foUowo apoa oar soaaaor of apsrohaodlac tho roel, aad
•risla, aad ita flaality ara aero fully aluoldataU la the paaoasaa
•var, w« Mttst aotiea oaa oth«r illuniaatinfi polat eat forth by Ai]ulaa«
la spaakiag of tha csod oad its dlst motion fran bolag (a dlstinotioa
!• find hara tha dootrina that tha othar traasewtdantala ara distiar
guiahad froB baiag by tha feot that thiy add soiBSfthiac whitfb doas not
hara raal axiataaoa la aatura but has existeaoa ia roasoa oaly* Tha
alieujua, aollieat quod rmBmrnt," TUxm trua i^nd tba good, ho«r«fr«r,
dlffar from being by aomatlilng nora than a nagatlon; th<qr add aonathlna
in tha da Potw&tiet
la alther tha lutallMt or will. B«l it ia elaar that thi^ ««• spokan
trlaa th&t tha fovnal ooiiatltuaDt of tha trua end tha good la a ralatlon
to tha Intellaet nad vrlll raapaotlvaly. Sl&ea Intellaet «ttd will era
trua aad tha i^jood, theea roliitioma, nut ba i»het la rafarrod to under
tha namaa of tha twos of tha ralatloaa. Iha doetrlfie, thwi, would ba
aav that lOglo doae not atudf that kind of unrael balms ^loh haa nonr
axlatenea In Ita daflnltion, »nd thet tha two fonaa of aagetlon, alalia
aagatlon and prlTfttlon. awka up thla kind, ikm wa nuat ooncluda that
tlon, baoauao wa hair* alraadjr astabllahad thet Aqulnaa hald the aubjeet
after refer to thla kind of entity na logleal baing. Tko linaa of invaa-
tlgetlon now lie open before ua, thnt of lutfletlona and that of ralationa.
first of th« two notions t eoordiiig to v;hieh tva fO\md the subject of
rft «snttin4;tion of tLo texts reveals tbf^t / ttin^s nses the tsira intsp-
hewersar, th^.t the subjeet under aieouesion in this p< rt is hunen ; ction ;
ond motion is ordered to 'n end whieh is aone ^:!OOd outaide of itself,
CEAPT« T ?•«• U4.
Altbaui^ it la xiot with ioteation e« a& aot of tha will that lo^ie ia
in ganaral.
will eeoording to the diff«r«it ways in idiiah the will ragerda tha and.
of a tandaney or oparetion.
tba aaaia quaatloa na tha artlolaa just ):Mmtloaad. Tlta dlffarenea ba-
latontion is proporlr an «ct of tho will, fbla ia not the only oonuoe-
adopted this eaalysis as his own to 8iak.e use of it for the explaaatioa
of bis own positiTo doctrine. His e^itproaeh to the probl«D was soaswhet
diff«rtii%{ y«k, b«o«iuitt htt aoe»p%» ths troth of this explaaation, h«
elsarly 60— aot raeard it f.e in nay wey Ia ooBfllet with hie own.
en eat of tha will, «oept that tha eetira rsthar than tha ppsaira
aat maanlngs thet intact ion can hara, tha &ct of tha i&talleet in ra>
BOttts taantia , tmm naaas tha intsUoot or tha wbola soul. If tha
wbola soul ia Baaat, tha aot of any ooa of ita feoultias would ba on
BOt of tha aoul; e\ad tha first naaalng of intention distiagaishad hara
alSht r»f«r to tha ijntajDtloR of tha will r «h«r th' a to «ay hOt of tho
lAtoUaet. But ulttafOtt#i aMMUi otjn bh^^iil aottl . It propcirly unenzia iatollfiot;
«ad if extetuled to nte^n aoul, it <!«fioalaf.tes tbo soul froa tho i&tollitet:
bolOAsa to tha i&tolloot, it is not vary el»T tvaok tha aontoxt ^hetbar
aaid, for inst'^eo, tJU-.t orery oo«BOfiOitiva iXK^ar ra^^xiiroa for ooe;nltion
aa intactioa, thi.t nii^t a»ui tha »et of p^yise attention to the objaot,
"tha latootion of tha thlag* aad la add to ba raeelvad. :-a naad not
upoa this raoaptlTlty of tha InteUaot aad aaa tha aetlTlty which ha
also asslcas to It. It sarros our prasaat purpooa niaaraly to nota that
a llkaaasa.
/arroaa hara ftnd ia not ndoptlnc ea hla own tha uaa of tha word Intanr
tlon in ^ia waanliig &8 the Intalllglbla apaalaa of tha thins. But
a ttaa of tha tana; and tha praaadiag taxta !jaotad« whcra ha la apaaklng
look brlafly at Uia natura and r6la of thla typa of intantioa. Tha
qgAPTHt T r««« 121.
know* fvod th« kaoim, bgr nlilob t)i« kaowcr bMozoM Ilk* th« thlag
Tbm atmtondtjr r«iair«d bgr oogaltloa is act tbat of oatura but rethar
Is Intflntionnlt
ttsft la soMS ««ar InfozB tha intsUaet of tha kaowar. Dut baaausa ths
likexM** rf^trmA for oognitlon la not oa« of netur* but of r«pr«s«ut«*
iloB, it Is not ib« pbyaiovl torm^ aamnrieelly identioal with th« on*
Iha thlas whloh la kjootm has Ita otm balxig thxoui^ Ita
fbm. In the aaa» way It has b«iiig la the l&talleet through the fom
whloh rapraaaota It tharat end eoeBitlon fbUowa thla form In tha la>
Dram Its rel»tlon to the extendi thing It is the psplnolple i»txloh de>
nhlob the Intalllfilble likeness hits to the thine, r»ther than from
MM
Intalliglblle «nln la uaaquaquo ro oat qulddltea.
of tha thing, «ad ao la formally or " latent loaaUy" Idsatlflad with tha
lataatlo latallaota
TGVt 0&4 sesBW to be looked upon hy /.(tuiUBs eo s lese proper use then
leete we haTo two Uvortaat AmptmeB of the Contya fisnti^eo «ihl<^ ex-
ploln its notion, the first by contrast witti the intelligible epeoies,
et othw texts whieh do not spoek of the intention by nana but explain
the s«sM JBOtioa or soms aspect of it in other tenos* These points are
to the thins knowa, and soewidly, the object ire sie&ifieeaiee of thAs
intention.
alaply, end yat eaaaot ba tha ama aa tha apaolaa whldh alaawhara
raaaonat tha thins oaa ba kaoan whaa abaaat (aad tharafora whaa tha
latallaet la aot eotttally davlTlng Ita fom from tha thing through
If tb« •zternFJL objMt la sot praMBt, th« obj«et «« known i& tha in«
The inteatioa la hare given ita apeeifie neiaa, intaBtio iqtelleet tt.
flptii^ed from the intelligible apeoiea «Aiieh infonaa the inteUeet end
fMuft thio oxplnoatlofi ooaM other pXaooa whieli uao tho tam
aagr oloar iAdieatioa of tho amat aanao In i^ieh tho tana la anployod,
laotc) « Thoai
Bfid tho IntantlOB vhl^ Jolna tho Intolleot to tho Intolllelblo objoot,
a, aolfllnoi .
uo, thoaa whloh hera Ilf a aro hl^av amd. aero noblo than tho Inanlnatot
and woong thoao whleh horo life tho bl(^o«t aro Intolllgent boln^a,
whleh htiva tha poNor of raflaotlng upon thaaaolTaa nnd knowing than-
»
aolT0s. Th% huoan i&telloet h&t this powor arwi thou8))| tMiag th«
(theu«^ this does aot et &U denjr the intwitiozMl identity with the
whstt the intention is OAlled e word »nd idtmtified with the internal
beeauss whet is directly signified is whet the aind oonceiTee about the
thing,**
Btthar tha thing kaom or Iha lotantlon «hiaii «a h«va fotnad of tba
thiag a«a ba «ada tha objaat of our istallaetioa. Dlnoa tha iataalian
aad thua kaoa it* Thaaa two aata of andarateundias era diatiaot, and
tharafora tha (^Jaata apaaifrlng than ara ^lae diatinet; th&t ia,
tha i&taotlon ia aat tha thiag of ahieh it ia tea iatawtioa, Iha dia-
tisetioa of tha intaation fron tha iotellaat ia rtuwa fToR tha differ-
}SL ^ uadaratoodi it haa ao haias othar thaa ttial* Tor tha iatalteot,
partiaolar set.
tut ttDd«0P«tOOft l
the t«ia of his knowing. The tsni or word tbus eonealTsd is celled
in as aaaoh as the word has a distinct existaooe firan that of the eon*
•Bd tha aaopa of our imraatl^tlon to aotor Into than h«ra. Our ood>
oaarn la with tha loeloel Intantion, not dlraatly with tha lnt«nial word
tha ralatlona of tha l&taatlon to tha Intallaot I'-ai to tha thing uaowas
bains.
tbo intalloot, and ataada to the Intellaot txB aeeldont to aubjaet, Ita
tnm Ita ralatlon to tha axternal objaet its «4iola Intelligible <ttvarao-
Intelleot ^Ad the eeaentlal ouallty of the fhins IcBomi. To the aeol«
tloB of the team beaan a e It la aot aoaiathl^ n aoa aauiij to the f»na,
et oae« th« torn of tho Intellovt aad of th9 tbiag kaomi; naA Is tboro-
hotac.
tho balng ond tb« r«r«r«ne« of the TOuoopt, w« eaa aajr thnt It hot a
Intalleet, «»d that of Ita truth, «rhiel^i la founded on the thine knoimt
Bgr reeaoa of thla tmnaeandental relation of the conoept the alnd lt>
not aeoordiag to all, than Juat wbat ia it nbout tha roel thlae vhiah
ia rapraaantad?
it «hat it ia:
of tha thiast aad la tha aaaoad eaaa it naaaa aooMi focnal or intalli-
tbi-t is, tbs thing kaowa pgpseisaly as kaewat ^Ad sines tbs objset is
Ths last MBBBsar of ooasidsriae ths naturs, sailed its "absolute oon-
but what belongs to ths rsry notion of ths thia« end is nsosssary for
ASt ecassmsd with ths aaaasir in which the nature sxiats or how ths
of Chapter III and aeeordlng to lAitii losle wa« aald to oonalder thlnfia.
Vlth thla ere oontrtiOted two stntaa In vriciloh thla nHture la found, or
Ilxia haa a double iBQwrtaaoe for lojglo, first for the undarstandlag
•f what leglo treats of, aad seooadly for the uodorataadlag of pradi-
ai<\pTsa Y p««* is9.
estlon Hbout thing*, on* of the pnytieulHr polnta that loglo atudlM,
Th« Xattw d«p«aa« upoa the batog of tue real auhjeot In whioh tha
netura is found } the tormar, uptm tha baing of tha Mtura ia the mind.
tha intalleot, Q«rt«tia logioel eeoiilaata will follow it from the manner
undMr8tettdin£.
eosnitioni
Ca/PHR Y Ptg« 1*0,
froai tha thing but on* cjkl tba aeeM* But thara ia aoothar way in «hioh
tion upon tba intelleetiva ao% and tha nadla inplied in it:
nila fbXlowa natureilly fron tha nmture of any aetiva powar, whidi by
tion tha powara of the aoul hctTO a oartpin power of refleotion or turn-
ing baOk upon thanaalTes, oind throu^ thia they een know their acta
and oadia:
Si^SS&X 9m»uxs
aaA oBly 1a tha aaooad pluoa ejtd bjr coiuia<]umiea of its llrat Intaar
tloB la thara aiqr intaation of itaalf &xk& ita c^a priaolplaa nnd
iBBtrunanta*
la thla raapaot that Intallaat dlffara trca aanaB t:a& enirpataaa It,
thlac Thla la baoauaa tha huoaa iutellaet, baiag tba Xoaraat cud ooat
a§%ci»B troK. tha pbantaan. It la lad tiy thla apaolaa flrat to tha knew-
ladaa of tba thing of whloh tha apaolaa la tha likaaaaa, than to tha
ksowlade* of ita own «tot, and flm<>lly to tha iiarlnolplaa of thnt nett
fnm tha aataal kaawlaCia of tha thing tha apaclfiad aat la kaoan;
aad tnm ttia apaeiflad aat, tha apaolaa whleh glraa It ita apaoifiea-
tion, tha poaar of tha aoul thua abla to ba dataraiaad aad to aat, aad
tha propaorklaa aad aaaanoa of tha aoul Itaalf farm kao«B. vihat Intaraata
•Bd oaly ^ r«n.*««lT« tKaainctioa of th* i»«l ck>*B it baooise Uic* ob-
likeaaaa vbleh /iijuiaaia peiaia out la tha taxta aaan sbora dlatlBgalttt-
lag tha aKi«t«ie« of tha likanaaa la tha Intalleot end its rafor a&ea
Ita o«B aell||Bf aiiataaoa, ita ova oatura, aad pvapartiaa; or it oaa ba
B«l thigr do haoro a basis in reality, the iHiaie being the neture of
Kinds of Intentia—
aaw this briatja ua beek to wlMl wee a«ld about the oubjeet
aena here aa lamatlnts reel {bundr^tion, and for sobm it ia only renote,
Ike subject of lofiie, we heve aeen, haa to be of the lest kind, a re-
tiooate being raneteljr fbuaded In the real. But a»at of what we have
eeid of the intent io intelleotn or the Terbwt intepius fite the dea-
tbias axiatlng outaida tha aouX.** Tba roal axtanuil tlxli« wblOh la
kaoMB, iqr tha fact that it la ooaftonnad to tha intaUaet (that is,
ijtfoittad hj tha acna fom) an4 thua laakaa tha intallaot (ia »ot) txua,
flM Bt»«a wbi^ aicbifiao tha ooaaapt, that ia, tha iatallaet ia eet
aad thiag, proparly nppliad to tba tbiaa itaalf • thua tba ooua "aMa"
•iSBifiaa tba oeoo«pt of laaa aad, baoauaa of tha truth of tha oonaapt,
tbias, but ia aena nor upon tba ooaaapt of tha thiag aa it ia in tna
It
ottotiOj «b«r«i
tbo aot of UBdflrotaadlag oad tbo ooaoog^ or torn of tbet «et, end lo
dlroot aot aad oone^itt aot oaaotljr of tbo «belo pxoeoos or of tbo
tbat ooMont aad aot. Ibat this swdlatod Intantlon la tho ono wltb
this t«xtt
Iha Intantlon of gaaoa la ooa of tba aa»«q>lM whloh at* Ttoawa ooat
datloa la rMllty aoao %b» laaa, ba la dan^rlas that l^^ls a parm flo-
Intarzud word (alao oallad tha lataatlo latallaeta ) dooo not, howavar,
UMdMnrtflttiOag «r it.
t«ra Is not rootrloted to tb« first of th« tbroo aeto of roctoost aiaplo
thooo tonOAi oloo Torify tko aetioa of iatontioa. Thoro aro thercdToro
tha aajraaaad t«na of tho firat aet of tha oiaA, whleh sreapa ttBaaa»>
jj^oaadad (toidditativa fanw aad la for thla VBa$m aallod tho **und«r>
tha a/Uogivit
of tha §mm
P«C« ISO.
flod with tha roa latallaetw . f^ut minathlag aay b« uadaratood la althaor
la tha flrat plaaa la tha rael thlos axlatlae outalda tha aoult tha
••If &• ioEMfva ^ sias;!* r«fl«otioa Which !• ft«ll«d • —qui^^ aini tnt»ll«»-
%m b«r«, b«l "•& JjrtMillMi («r siag^ ' ••tlilatf*) wbiA foll«vs tb«
htmmaam th« ••cmida latalXepta arm oonatiiasa r»f«rred to bgr that aami.^
• «igr» •!&•• it la had aft«r th« dir^at kaoidadf^. But th^ raflmc
soul" studies th^ aottl 6nd It^ prop«rtlaa (**9aaBioaaa**}«^ Aad aatwal
••ouatan aana aaa***^^) • 1h« Intttlllglblo spoelaa «ad tha ooBO«pt er»
Tlaa of tha aabjaat la vhloh It Inhoraa, but from thnt of the objaat
ti«a «a fMwd thst what is rs iff sa satad la tha iatallaet Is tha iatelli-
the aature not only does in f&ot exist » but it has two dlfferaat andes
of asisteaoe, oas la reel singular things, the other in the sotil. I^ow,
upoB its direct Qpparshensioa two differeat klnda of refloot ion o<ui fol-
low, one upon the proreaeaee of the eoaoepft. Idie ottisr upon its state
la the mind. Sgr a refleetlon v^ioa the i^kaataan tnm whloh tha Intel-
lislble ^peolea wna derived, the ititelleet esa kasw the alagular la
•MS thatt tbia la th« «MMld«retioa of tho MitiaM MMVdiag %o %h« ««%
thm raal oxlataaoo of thia aaturo; for »ooordia« to aaeli aoda of «cla»
Lagia will aWdr tha aaeldaata tbat fbllov ayaa tha aotiatttoa of tbla
abiali that aatura baa in tbe latellaet PAd to wbat follova upoa ita
of baiag uadaratoedt aad ahat Ibllova upon ita not of balse ia tba
tvMA lAglc aaA 9«]roholocy. Thou^ botL eonaldar tb« fbsk whloh !• in
bappans to this fana or absolute n&ture. In the one ease the miijeet
is the soul onA the reeeived turn is the aoeident; in the other ease
the underetood font is the sabjeet and the pg epT ties ahioh belong to
siqr that the nature itself is the subject of the seienee of losiot but
rather the properties whieh it has fron the smombst la vhieh it exists
in the intelleet are theoselves the sabjeet of lo^e. The nature, item'
erer, ie their subjeet, The apparent oonfVuiloa here between the nature
tiott, since the earns entity is net a subjeot ^nd an accident in respect
suoh «t8 tbo mattil •oi«B««i and logie, haro «« tlioir st^Joot eiooidvts
tiaat
which it hea &a e raattlt of tha laaiiBar la lAlab tha iotallaot uQdar>
ataada it, end Hakaa tbaaa i^ropartiaa it a mbjaet. Qiagr er* eallad
ittlantiona, tha mev in whioh the intallaot looka ckt tha oatura whieh
to theae intent ion* ahioh follow it a eziataaea ia the iutelleet i%ad not
Bill tha aapa«t uadar «diia)i a aaiaaoa aoaaiiava thiaga eonatitutaa its
Intantioas fbllev tha aaaaflr of aaeh of tha three eeta of reeeon will
be agained ia %km ftaal three cba^wa, Raare we need oaljr point out
tiouler ltln4at th« Mopocltioii of judgpMot In tb« M«>a4 aet glvas rl««
iatelXMta.^^
pradieatod of itt
hmf •••& tho flobjoot of logic anurt bo* tho oubjoot of whleh thagr
tboao lataiitloiia« baa Ita oslatanoo only la tho iilsa« 9vwi laaa, tbaa,
oaathw atap rawwrad frot tha rael, Wias aoaldaata of ea uaracl atb-
tlwt» tboueh thalr pvoxUanto foundt^tlon la only la tha aiad* tbay hava
aonaibat anra oftMk It naans th^ rae^iTod foxs tgr whiob this teadaney
between the lntelle«fe and the thing ka«im. The dlreot eonoept or f iret
wo Boot eoo irtuRTo it oould fit «aoaB tho x&iao oooituuxto omaorotoA in
oorioa** lo oippoood to that boing irtiloh hoo Ito oxloto&oo in tho soul:
Xt wottld thoroforo ooon thot ell aiiio of tho itoeidoala mat bo roal
boiag sad thflft a» r&tio&ato boing could find a plooo amooc thOM.
dooo aot havo to bo rool boomoo of Ito vary notion it dooa not pooit
fhia dooo not aoaa that rolationo aro novor roi^ aad that thajr aorw
odd any aeoldoatal roality to tho aubotaneo In vhioh thogr oro found.
aMPTBin !>•«• 161.
MtiNlorimi: '^sl mai%mk relatlo non M0«t la rebus «stre niiwi aott
not slffalf led tis soMstblog belooglna to Its subject, bat as io<Aia8 to
aaeh of tba othwa aa wall. Ihotti^ tbay hava ia aaaMaa tha gaaaar&I
«aa h«a ita ova paouXiar aatura by wfaieb It ia a diatiaot kiad of <)•>
tarMiaetion of aabatoneai
Msttoa of Kalc-tion
lAicb tha oatacsriss ham as distinct flsasva ead ths eennoa eharaetMr
statasMMit aliioh ws not bafora, that ia res*^d to all bsiags «• aey ooar
on boiag «h«t tbo attbjoot lot oad tbua «• b«vo oabotonoo. Or wo aay
or nott
ita aaaantlal aatura an addad parfaatioa bgr ahleb It "looka ta" aoM^
jliyaleal ordar la aaan la th* word "ralatloo'' Itaelf aad ita oagaata
v«rb, to raf«r« th* flrat a»aaing of r^imr* la "to aatnry baak** { aad
tba ooua riatio darlrad from tb* jwat partlolpla of thla v«rb, r ^y
,
aanry tba tbouekxt of ona tblag orar to tbat of aaotbaar. Tba tbiog of
rafarrad". Mtd tbla a**d aat ba raatrlotad to tboutibt oaly, far thara
!• found e vaiufon ! things irtqr th4 «hmi«kit of oatt is axtrndAd to that
of esethor* Thii la mmm boarinc of oao thiae apoo enothav, mbo ox^
of our tbotti^t* Iho foot of & thliie*a bolne thua '^oarrlad orar" la
This apyoars fn» a aneh boldar axinrosaiea wAiioh 4<iaiaas drMs tnm
rolatodt
but ra%h«r tluit •jhmuummi of tho r«l«toA thlag to it* taw whloh ecwwNi
ow^arison ;
Thtwtfi tho first 1—aniBc ot tho word would bo ea set of tho rational
Anothar is ordo , mis bsms to bo ;:)t. fhOMs* aoat aaturo sad jiiilo-
roletieasi
CKAfrai y P«C« 168.
bolaga Othar aodaa ara kaown by thalr dafiolaaoy fron tba raal aad
»ot tahaa bwa la tha oeanrvta aanaa of tha ladlvldaala ea oaa laval
atlOB**^} ead thla aot la tha aetlra aanaa, maealag tha opMratloa of
la, aa tha rmtf baarlae or ataadlas whloh oaa tlilag haa to another.
nrat, thara «ra tha two dlatlaot tflma ralatad, whleh aaa ba callad
tha "ii trm i a "! tha oaa balag tha aubjaot, that whl^ la raletad. tha
othar balag tha taan, that to whlah tha eubjaat la ralatad. i^aaklat
CHAPTtV '•«• 16«.
far rolvtloa tb«ro nut bo two. Ammg thooo th«po 1« it o«ftHltt b»f«n>o
slilsli tlio rolatiott starts, sad tho torn Is osasldsvsd sssoad as that
to wfaioh or by roi son of whl,«h the subjeot lotdcs to its twm, Thla la
la ttaa a«M laatura /^foiaaa aiylalaa that vtallty d»«a aat aoaatltuta
to (iUBatlty:
raaaoa of ita IntaitBlty, tba moto or laaa of quality* JLfctar tba rala-
diaorate >4,UAntityt
tha quentity of oaa thing oan aarra as tha aaaaura of aoaathing alaa,
STCfta vMBtity) eriaaai «Bd tha foot ia aeAs tha unit, tha oga irtiioh is
ia a form of qoentity. And whan unity is found mans tha othor oata-
eithar from an aetion «Dinc «& lb«ra and now (an instcAoa iarasu]Kpoaad
but not mantioaad) , tnm a pant aatioa, or naraly f ran tha bebitual
woxks, AqiOnas ttsvally nanan than* two foundatiMM, <2a»atity and notion*
ff*F?fy^^ VNi*m.
tlM Pliyalea juat cjuoted axoapt thet the two foimd(>tloaa erm nat glTaft
as Baraljr tba prlaelpal oaaa, but aa tha oaly oaaat aad ttaa axpllelt
aanat ^uaatltgr aad uotloa or paaaloa; for not oaly caay <iuallty ba ra-
paaaloa tha oofriiieala la thla tasfc la «ragr tram tha aatual aetlag or
«a aaqr add that of tha four oetagorlaa tMhlah fOllev aotloa aad paaalon,
Wnm «ho aabjaot aad t«na aad ttm fonadatioa «ar oauao aa
tha alanaata tlia raXatioa itsalf nrlaaa oa tha fonacd affaot, end ea
aueb ia dlatiaet trcm Ita alaaaata aad ai^aalally fraa Ita fBvadatioa
itatloaata aalhtione
raltitlOB ia. Ia aaqr of tha toxta i^ioh ajq^lal&ad tha aetura of re>
BBd thla, aot oaly froai thalr aet of axiataaaa { —99 ) whlca^* balone-
aaaevdiat to Ita fom.^ Both ara la tha aabataaoo par aa at abaoluta t*^
%h«r«<br« th«gr •*• tOMthias racl in tb« mbstaBM or otb«t«lM» thaor
•r* aothlag. aiAM thslr very ratio raqalrM their r«iiaity, it would
rolatlont
t«ioo la tbo oubjoot, tho rol£tioii OBkaaot bo roel} sad if it ham roal
ooU ao a oubjoot. mio aaMOUi that «er a rool rolotloa tboro nuit bo
a roaX dlotiaetiOA bolwoaa tbo oubjoot aad t«m; etharwloo thoro will
MB to* no (jtudrtlty axofpt la oobm r««l tbiac* aad th«ro o«tiuwt bo aetlon
folloaa ttpaa anaatHilm tbat balossa to tba aubjoet (tbat la, a—a tbliiK
ableb tba aubjaot haa la rai«lity and ahleb la not aavaly attrlbutad to
upoB tha opoTRtioa of tho kaawart b«t ea a ralatian of tba thing known
ralBtioa is not r»ul| it doaa not ham axlatanoa ia tba ordar of raal
is bqr dofeot of ito fouadatioat tbo aoxt throo ero bgr dofoot of tho
loft tsM appliod to laiaols, wharo tbo rolotioa has a fouadetloa ia tbo
divaraity of poworo of tho wiaal, but oboa ri^t and laft aro appliad
viion tba fouadation ia aot rod or aot la tho subjaot, tho rolettloa
aot ba raal« haaaoaa hcra too thora «ra not tao tanM la raallty, hot
oaly oaa, iMt alaaa tka Istallaet oaa loak at aoa-balas aa If It ««ra,
aaA by that faat It bea «xlat«Baa la tha latallaot, tbara ean ba a ra-
«h«B leekad at la oaa «ay, but aaraal i«taa aoaaldarad froai aaothar
tha raal ordaor, net just la tha ordar of tbo««jbt| but whaa lookad at
from tha polat of Tlaa of tha praaent tlsia, thar ara aot, and aa ara
aa tha praaadlag thraa. iwt Ilka tha aaaoad aad third It too la a
thara ara aot two thlaga {rjm) ahlA ara aaaparad* Tha ralctloa It-
•
••If !• not na nXlqwia Irat only •& j^ all;gu4d , Thlaei «r^ r«lat«4|
St. TbfiMM insists ttpoa) a r«latioa <toa8 aot hwra a r«^p«ot to • oia
thiae •!•• but it is, ^ its T«cy aatuva, a ra«p«et, thmf is ao ^•a-
•olT^ tt^ ia MBi ilMHrd iafinlt* moeImii fnr aaah aav ralatioa would ia
iaflaity aiaeo th« r«l«tioiia ar« aot afflBMid a* in thiaga but only as
thiakebls, aad in thought ohly potoatiaUy, for thigr ara n«T«r all
thara aatttalljr,^
fl Tm§0 Ut,
I. both roli^tioBo ««• rtntionato only; S* both «iro rooli wiA 3« oao i«
nuraa axaajpXaa aro glTaa. Tha flrat la tha relation of Idantltjrt tho
•ooond, that batwooa a bolag aad aoofboingt tha third, ralatlona whleh
would ziot ba ratiMMta} but only tba lest "fellova iipoa tha BOt of rmt^
B«a,* ma la tha aoaa aaqapa aalon idii^ wa aat rafarrias to tha objaa-
tha aubjaot of logio* /«A tha aocwplaa fit Into tba aana pattarnt
"cwaui aaA i^aaiaa aad tha Ilka," Thaaa logleal intaotiona, tbaB» tof
tlkmuJAt only and sot in reality,' mtiooAt* hwim o«& b« only a r«le-
tioa. Tb* dlatlnotlon battw^m rMl «ad VBtlonat* ralatioos niBd* h«r«
•o^pariag on* thias to lOi* otbor," And tbo axsKpla glTan, thouitli
pared to « reel aaiael, but the obsoluto nfetore (or ratio), men, ehiob
tioas, not reel indiriduels nre ooa^pared. The ooaperisea (taken net
la ea eetiTe sease ee the aet of eooparias, but objeetiToly %is the ««gr
relation.
the s«M article. THe diffemt kinds of raltrtiosa i«hieb follow upoa
be ratioaate, the oth«p reel. The latter is the relation of the inter-
nal word to the intellect froa ehldi it proeeeda. 'iiaoe the word is
botveea the word and the intellect wcsopt ea eoaaeqaeat upon the epore->
tion. ant this relatioa U real es beiveea effect and cause. The
,
la tha thlaga uadaratood , 1%^la doao not naMi la th* axtarael thing
twaaa two objeotiva ooaoapta, Tha word adlaprapit la th* ona whloh «a
found uaad in a mwliar of tha aa>at axpllolt tazta d*alia« with th*
dueing it.
tha aaaand foUowa tha uet of kaowlaa bgr a oartoln naoaaaity. Ithoutfi
tha artiola ia partleularly intaraat*d in th* a*eoBd kind and go** into
It at gr*»itar iMgth than th* firat, end it ia tha flrat kind ia whioh
«• ar« •spiMitilly lataoresteA, stlil, beosus* th« irtiele srtlele has •
bMdPlac ttpo» o«r Qiwatioo and th» ooBiynot of t)i« Moosd klad with th«
first throfws addsd light upon It, ths whole artiols Is worth t^viotlac*
first, rat leasts rslatlons srs distlagul^ed fro* reel, thso the first
whloh tha lataUaat ooasldara. Ihove^ «ia thlags ralataA Ao not tha»»
ordar aad attrlbutaa thla ordar to tha aoKtroaaa, not aow a£ nadaratood
b«t as tbir «*• ia thamaalTaa. Ttii9 latallaat teas not uadarataad than
1^ tlugr raally did* Vae to hava en ordar thlags anst ba ra&l aad tha
thaa la tha aactranss aad ao la ratloaata fMn ona aide. Ilkla la tha
eofts ero obJeetlTO ooaeopta, roa lnteU.oatao, the ordar of the paa j
but the aaturoa aa oaaealTad aad havlag tba ooadltlaoa «hl«9i tbia oon>
eaptloB lc9>oaaa upaa thaa. Ibaaa ralatloaa are ooatrl!iad bjr raeaoa
avft ajua tiuod eat ia iatolleotu ad raa qoaa aaat axtre^Tel ation ordi-
ita beiOG olaaaif iad aa aueb. but ».lao fron tba faet that at least one
of the aoKtreBoa ia aot a real thiait but a ooaoopft. Ihe mabjeet of the
relation, the aatara Utalleata aa iatolloote> eaa hare ita bein« onljr
the relatioa aaaaat t>e reel, llxat aueh relationa partcia to logia
tba iatalleet, aa logieal iateatioaa are, end follow upon the operation
wMtm n Met im,
of the infc«Il«et am lo^iecil Intoatiofts do, but gwiM and spMl** ar*
atfht bo iB%<rjflrotod so a—iilag that sonao «ad opooleo ero Just tho
othor toxt 1* la eloair that opooioo muI nmn» aro thonsolToa rolatlotw
foro, which foliow vjxuk tha set of uadoratendlfia, «ra darlaad by tho
losieal latoatloM aro auoh rolntlona* lh«y aro qwkaa of la tha aamo
aooai
tho latoUaot to tha thlas kaom. Tba raflax latent loa la aa Intoo-
thro* eeta of rmmm aro oxantaoA la tho iiMct tbroo A«Dfk«r«. Mmuh
acta; and thaaa ralntioaa Bf aot foaad thara raadf-aada, but va-
aoa Mikaa than ( faelt) • ^^ad it doaa thla by ooaaldarlut; » but ooa-
oaa «iet, th«ra mat ba aa objaat for thrt r>9% to ba aaarelaad upoa or
raal thli«a oMatioaad Just bafiora tha vorda ^itaotadt "li-at qoldaa a«4o
qaaa ratio noa faelt, aad aolvn ooaaldorftt, aleut aat ordo rarua
evAara thaa aaA nt tha soaa tlaa kaowa tha ordar «hl«h it la aateblliAt-
*te kaow «rdar**.*^ It la thla ordar, thaaa raltntlons, whldh erm tha
of tha parta of a aantaooa to ae^ othM*; that la, tha raletlon of aab-
•aA othar and to ooncluaiona* aueb raletloaa ara tha ordar v&loh
dably, ainoa tha Hat nakaa no pratanaa at belns aoii9l«ta, but vhlah
aldaredt
thla nature to the real extamal thlnsa. It form a raletlon, and thla
r«letlon la tb» iat«alio& of uBlvarMlilgr «ltl«ii It ttttrllmtM to th«
Atun •• kamm.
Kara latautlaaa ara glTaa aa tba ayibiaat of loela, «ad tba aylXoglaB^
tlM pvopoaltlon, aad tha pradloeta ora aaaaft aa aacaaitXaa. '<ut tha
ooaaXtulon th«t tha EtMoe apoka of; tha joopoaltloa la oaa of tha
Xocla »as oaa fvoa tha ooHMntery oa tha fourth book of tha featartaraloa ;
•iiaorad (la rabua oongldaretls ) • Thaaa Isttar fjt* tha raa Intallaetea.
tha ohJaetlTa aoaaa|>ta» to vhl^ %h9 IstantloM and ralatloaa ara attrl-
for whan raaaon raflaeta upon tha muuMV la whlah tha abaoluta aetura
of tha thiag kaaaa la wlthla tha Intallaet, It alM aaaa how It migr ba
r«latad to tha thlaga aad to othar eonoapta taA thua davlaaa thaaa ra-
vbleh It has auiealvad traa thaaa rael thlnoa, but In vlaa of tha atata
whloh thaaa naturaa heva frai balag la tha latallaot aad balag kaom.
PaC« 194.
K>«T III
»• attttr tlMso eota «• tlio aubjaot of tho Mlanoo of losla* tho w£b^
joot la tbo latactloiui MUd roletlona nhlob fOUow upon thoao aeta* B«t
ladlroatljr witb tba aodoa of kaewlaft vrtildi datwadaa ^«r — aot ao sMOb
with kaovlng aa aA aatlvo pioooaa, tia with tha aoadltloaa sad datacadaa-
tlana ahlOb that proeaaa a«ta upon tLa ooataota of our thou^^t nhan wa
jmllrrTiTl, and raaaoBlas, to •— what ita soda of kaawlas la. i&uat thla
of tba alianta of tha ralAtlon, Its subjaot, Ita taro, and oopaelally
Itaalf,
what it! 0ubj«et U uad «platalng this subjaot, it wiU aot hm a«M»>
•axy tor vm in this final part to dfftarala* all tba kinds ant spMiM
of Intaation portaiaiag to oacb aet of rooaoat a briof tniioiry into
mmdix of tha thrao kinds of intwitioa taksn gansriecAly will suff io*.
aOiat tha logionl intantion (tha gasMS si^bJsotiiB of tha saionea of logie)
is, than to axplaim aa«b kind of intention for its o«n B«ka.
ffig vnvmati of javnemLTix
Wo boTo aXrway mms that bjr thia net tha iBtollaet ppprabanda tha
wa nuat sow aamlaa wxra fully vhat It mmw tbat tha quiddity of a
Abatrtiotlon
Th0tt4^ bia eoe&itioa ia not liaitad to tha aanalbla r.&a doaa riaa
bo<^, but not op«r«tia8 «-» th« font of • bodily orgaa, it is by Mttur*
their BHitsriality arm not knowable as thagr axiat. Ibagr eaa baeoaw
by
iatallifiible only ^Obstreet ion froa thmt natariality* Our Intel last,
end their objeet, snd hvEmn ooi^^^tlon, nbleh stands aidavy bstwssn*
tarial mummt* Ihe bwan intelleot, being imaatarial nnd yet the
faoullv of a MNd iaftoiBiag • Battrlfil be4r« pvopMAy kaows ftonaa
las to th* noda of the r««alT«> {*Gvm mmm quod raolpltur la ellquo,
tf tha tmu «r t;ulddlty of tha thiag lowaa la raaalTad Into tha InteX-
tt«r«iet«rt
whlah ataads la tha way of ita balag garaapad by tha Intallaot, but ita
aatariality
th«ir font to«l firoM th«lr 8Mitt«ar, th«lr siniBXanty !• tl*d up with
Tha abstmatad font of aaa doas aot rapraaaBt Jttm oar Janaa, Patw or
Ihle la tha aena ftor all IndlTlduitl man; it ia totmoa. to (vll: *Nstara
Tha UalTaraaX
by ita exiataaoe la the aouJL (though «a axe aot yet apaakiag of the
cood «at«a
Int«U«etaa
W illi ••% aeitur p« latalleetua.
«iiIb fttolt tialv«rMlltat«a In vabos,^^
•alia, aea •naft alal la mdIbb.**^ )%•% la aanat la that tha nettuNi,
•oclataooa In thln«iat
DMa4atl«mt
tha point of rlaa from which wa taera ao tat baan rafarrlng to tha
ba aada bat aaan tha netuta whiah undarllaa tha latantloa of ualTaraalltsr
aellt/t
lteiT«ra«l« aapIloit«ar potMit sMlpl. QM
avdtt pve
ip«« netttra, eui lnt«lleetus »«tribuit IntwtlosMB
inlTavMlltatisi at ale unlTtrndla, ul ganare al
apaoia*, aubdkaatiea rarun algniflaact, at pvaaAlaaap
t«r iB quid, ^ttiteal «alB ai|soifla«% aubatantie^ a jus,
da <tm pvaadleatur, at bcno ainilitw. Alio ae^ p»-
taat aaaipl tnlTwacda loquAatuM «at ualTaranla, at a*>
aiuiiua cMOd ooaeldarrtur aalmtil vol hoM> ut uoitt la
mltla.^7
aabla to aaflart
MCMPtsA as ons dsrlvlng txvm tBoayt ''Sle «ila selm est vmua ds BuXtls.
'I
as unlYsrsal has its voal exist oaoo in tbiags. that is to tnko tbo
flMSMl; but than it is not in the ro(4. extompl things, but r ether in
^l*^''** SB, ^ttt"** ( jyi& lysis robas IntoUootts) | sad this is to scqt that
ware oKanlaiag rolotions, wo »tm that thsgr «sro said to bo in tho things
Taklag nhlngs" ps "* things kaown" wo oan sey that oven tho fomel
not ettribtttod to tbo soul oar to the iatelloot aa mut, but to tho
aaaw «ma aal4 tlao In tha t«cts i«hloli Olatlngulahad two •mauti of tb«
tlaaaB unlvaraeXltatla.**^
aad tba natura Itaalf • Ibla la dona la a r*^ ablcrti, tbaugb looct
ttia aat fegr ablflh It la kaiwa eiad aalata la tba lataXlaat ( Ipeutn Intal-
Bat alnea It eaaaot (ia aueb axlat aaeafpt la tha Mini, It la 6m faeto
aal (at laaat aatarliUjr). siaea tha aaooad objaotlva lnt«itloa ri^arda
th« Stat* wbi^ th« iiatiaM h«a aan r«suXt of tb* ao4« la wUi<^ it is
Utelisot knows th* maaamr la whi«b the anturo is komm «uiid ths aods
tha ra«l la tha amm aatura, not aoa aa Iomiu but aa axiatiag lo raallly.
u»oii, ga&ua:
tha aat of abatmotion. '^imathlac aora thaa t'alat thaa, ia naadad for
pluribua , (''or that & omq>«riaoa of tha abatrriOtad aatura to tha maqr
ssl; for by reflection it is seen to reDreeeot not only one thing but
ft
Ihlo poooago Io«roo littla doubt that Aqulneo bald thut ualvorsallty
tblo paaoooo so »oll eo froM thooo oooa abovo ia tdileh it «>ao oaid
aaturo nhieb ia tbo oubjeot of tho rolatloa} «ad that io tho oaao aa
roletod.
of abi«b it ia a likoeooai
OUITKa YII »NI« »».
aad Mtaraal; for ttao VMlity of the thing to whloh tb« eoaoopt ooi>-
PM0O80 qtwtod frwt tbo do m» <^ jMOHtio. wboro tho Mao OKparoMioa
Mlwww**), it vaa bXm Mid that the noturo h»a « rol&tlon to Indlyldttela
of fir at lAtaatioa, muh as "rael thiac," for thay aionlfy the thins
hoaavar, iMa ualTaraal aad ara aubordiaatad to tha fir at. A ganaria
Siaea it i« not only ranX thiasi whiob ara aostaload uadar tba lataa>
aan snore eptly azpraaa the tans of the raliitl4B as the Infartoyy rather
eithetr reel extarnal th&ate or other eoaoepte. But erea the re«OL thiage
hut uadar the lataBtioa of the node ia «hl^ thaf poaaese this
tuider i^e inieniwij of
aoture, that ie, siagiilftrity. It eaa therefore ri^tly bo said that
ia either oaao the t«m ia the nature under a leee ualTeraal intention
q)aeeti(m of e rod reXotion, thia could not be doiMi, beeauae the fouo-
bosoass i^psrsBt thst ths sflcs fom aust b* fOmd la both subjsot naA
that the foxia nust bs in both In sueh a vey as to 1st its saa«ttsss
Per ths qptnoos to r<q»rsseat BMoy, and the unlfioarailty of th* nature
fosaibla ths soiisilsnn o(f the eao nature to aajr infariore md fomalljr
Iha abatmatoaas ttad uaii^xnl^ aoaaa to tha nrttura fro« tha aet of
aot fonBaUy; for tha eet oeT tba latallaet bgr wliiab tta o^tuva la ab-
Ihua tha aatura la aaaa to ba aqualXy rapraa aatativa of all Ita Itt-
iB <iaBlit7 or fom. Tho lnt«iition vblAi fbllowa upon tho not of ainplo
ono rolation atill. boo«i»oo tb* sailtlplieution of tomo dooa not mul-
fOundetioa dooa that. / thing oqual to ma^ thlaea haa only one ro-
the intellect I
th.« intallaot, judipMBit, nnd than tha int«ntli«a Whitii falloaa «pea It.
dlTlalont
ijHiaAdotjU* dloltur ooi^^ioaitio, q^«iidoqu« dloltur divl-
•ie. (ieapoaitio q{iiid«Bi, 4a«ade ltt%«il«etnui emp«tw%
Th*r* «v« mam polnfea that dM«>T« «BWWina%ion la tbla t«et; Init b»-
t099 •OBsidisrlad th* mMl ft>uad«ti«ft and r«f«r«ae« of this t^ot, lat ua
todUr tha husiaa latallaat auffwa aooM of tba liadtatlona aad ooadi-
to ita ooa Bt«to la tho quiddity of matarltil aad aaaaiblo tblii«a. But
la M Bieb M aatt«r !• th« prliMlpl* of •psratimi aadi 9«rti«ult^lwk«
t« t«ka oa tha toxu of othar thiasa; for tbla raaaon tha q/iiMXtr of
tha objaot:
tho ooBsrata bai« whoso q^ddlty Is kaomt foir that si^ss kaowlodfls
aoeldaota ars not Inoludsd la tt.s ratio of the 9iU>stf nea, thsy ors
Bttt arM|»d iB tlM qiiidAitbtiT* ^nsntuMMian of th« mbstaao*. Aftvr
tk« mbstanaa is ^anuip*il, ih» ae«ld«ftt0 »r« stad* tb« ebj««t of kaow^
l«da«t th«lr quiddity alM la gra«p«d» end this abmlvleljr aatf Ind*-
Intallsst gna^B IdM aooiaants sspaarataly trtm sadi othar. avsn tl>»«iiJBi
tha Intallaot otmsot at tbs saas tiao svasp aaagr things ns naagr,^®
but only IndlTMtly aaA tgr lapUeetion. "^Ummm, cm tha etlMr hand,
tha aaaoM klad of abatreetlon a form sOLona la graap^A apart froa tha
aenaidarad without tha s&ttar of tba aonpeaita, that the tan abatraet
oenoludod frea tha faat that It la graapad apart frea tho IndlTldusla
Itt thcmght What •xi«t» to6«tti«r la VMllty, larMMfils only partial t1«w«
Ihaaa Tiam of Xh* raal, baomaa thay am nmf, oaat ba obtaln«d •ae>
eaaaivaly, ojoa «rt«r tha o^ar, aad tbua tha aogaltloa of our tuaen
la hov wa eaa kaav ^a raol thins *« it ia, thut la, aa ona, «a «xla-
waor ebjMt* r—iln »aB)r» w« oaaaot icaaw tb«K lU ad th* Mm tiaw nor
•• ypr—ttttag oaii r«Bl thine* s«mi furfeh«r opsrotlon is asssssnty
baiag.
mutr» ^V ttatt ell ba kaoaa If ^«gr aaa ssaNliow ba bvou^t into tha
aaeta Tiav (ffld ba aaaa aa oaa* Uaoauaa no baiae eaa «t tba atm» tltm
ba iafOntad wltb >Nra then ona foas of tba Bamn kind, «ad oU iatal>
intallaet, oaly ona apaoiaa aim ba praaant to tha intallaet i«t ona tlaia.
la ona apaclaa.'*
tbat will unite a«v«ra diffarant onaa ia aaa* way ao thai th«ar ao
iM^or «ra aaaa aa msay but la asna aaaaa as ona* Vot tba aaaa thiag
aaa ba mar tnm mm yoint of now «<ad oaa tnm aaothar, aa tha parta
DO longOT two dlotiiict thiagi, but thagr avo oooa as on«. CorrolatiToo
wo kaowm togolhor:
IhoB «4kon tbo intolloot sooo oonoopts m» rolfttod, it oooo ^on dm obo."
diTorgonoo or ooporation.
oUp o oi tiOB, slaoo it briago too eoaoopto togothori bat ttoa tiio point
oaa tntallaetuft i
tha dlatlAatloo irtilflh thagr hara in raaaoa bjr Tlrtua of thalr appro-
haoaios aad fraai thalr amx Intallialbla aharaotar. aad 4»aa not fom
as abaolttta uAity of thaat hut It doaa ^faat e ualoa batwaaa thant
A ttftioa wdcaa dlraraa thlsga ona. It d»aa aot oaka a alalia unity,
baaaiaa of tha dlraralty of tha alaBantat but It oan affaot -^x onlt
Mttar aad fom, la truly aad al^ply oaa { laagi atapllclt«Br tbontfi net
alaplax) • uaion aaa hara bo^ of thaaa aanaaa. Tha Inttar klad
of union la aJLae ••llod ooawtioat b««ms« %h« oloniaiita oxlst toe«th«r
daoka sa out of thalr aiibataBMM, Jaapwi anat put bMit tha saoldanta
with aealdaata In tha avibataaoa aad varloua aaaldaota jolaad la tha oaa
balafti
tloaad to our t^tur«), the rt^l objsot of otar kaoirl«d?« will b« e <mh»>
tho roel thlasi «ta4 Iqr Jolaiag tho ovotmsd of aa aooidont to that of
lUco that of tho thlng| for tho el«n«ito whldn go to oonpouaa tho roal
thlas oro roally dlotlaot, whiroaa tho thiaco oi^pilfloA by tho eeaeopto
okick aro Joiaod ^ Jiiftp—nt, aro aot roaUy dlotlnot toot idoatifiod
la roalltj,*®
tho ftbaoluto or abotraot f»**« hut 4oo« pareolTO snA afflm tho Idootlty
of tho thiato «hi«i hovo tbooo aaturoo* ftm abotr»otlo& by whiflb tho
tl«i of a wholo, not of a part or aaroly of tho font. VImmtfii Htf <iald-
'
--•-'-?t , it la Bot apprahondod uo
«Wf«nu
Ow «!%« lBtttll«o«tts ma^^&itimm tonmt, a««lpit
duo, quoanM uaiBi •• htb^ ut fonwd* r«sp«ettt elttvloai
uBte aeelpit lA at la alio «si«t«Bs, propter ^\»d prtf
<ie«ts tonoatur tonmHtme, st Idao, si tells op«rtttio
latolloetua «d roa dtboat roteel oievt ad eaooaa, opor^
tat «M>d la eoaiMMitia aubateatila Ipaa eeayoaitio
ftnna ad aatarlaa* axit ojua ijaod •• habat par aadaa
Drat tt9 feet thnt tba l&tallaot raprodueaa in Its oim vigr
tba eoaeratioa of tba rackl aitaraal thing nhiali ia kaaan, wa aMi •••
aad this la tha ooapariaoa of both of tba aonaapts to tba rael thiag|
attoh other by ooBpariag than both to tha tliiag whiflb aoeista in rae-
to tha aoapositioa of tha rael thiaet ^ad tha feot of joiaiat thaa
•bjaota ahiah thagr rapraa aat tin joiaad ia raalityt tha thing ia ir
iltioa of it a A«aaalst
Oft aoeiaoBtal flam cttd tho oottor lo tho oiibotoBOo tokon no ooeead
oot of bolagt
fljCTB^i^^
Is partloularly tiua of tha jadciawil, i4iar« tba a«t of balag i4vl^ tha
tklag baa In tha Intallaot la tha ooiunloua alen of tha liOt of bains
tha thing la kafom. la tha judgaaat aana of tha wovda la thla taxt
tftfca OB a na« foroa; far tha raflax kaowladga of tha «et of afxlataaea
«tilah tha Objaot hoa la tha latallact ("aaattaAaa aaaa latalll«lblla (|ttoA
aa aaaaaaoyy but aa aaaaatlal part of tha Judcwnt. Nat oaly doaa tha
thli« kaam aodat In tha latallaot «ad tha Intallaot uadarataad It,
but tha Intellaat kaamB ih»% It uadarataada, aad tqr balag «n?ra of
S. JUlLiaiMea&l
itot only doaa tha oeaq^eltlon of Judsaaat ragpraaaat tha
la truth, but only tb«t la vAiioh th« liit«llMt is ea« of the tarai.
abA th« iBt«lX««t BMit «rt«r inio this rsXatlon la a awaasr pivopar to
and tha ada qfttatlon la OMiaeleaa. whan tha IntaUaot oottforew Itaalf to
a thing aaA kaoaa Ita ada.tuatloa, hy that vacy fset It afflrr^w or «t>
taata It; It efflraa that tha thing la aa ttw Ictallaot rapraaaata It.
Qaljr th9m la thara truth fcHmelly, This, hoaarar, oooura only in Jaig*
ant i4iaa tha Intallaat Jolna or aaparatasi for la judg^ont tha thing
that «»hl«h la rapraaaatad la aaothar oaaaapt. Thua not only ara ao»>
oapta aeaparad with othar. but tha eo^poaltlan aada by tha lataUoot la
thia oetlva eeHparlaani end ao tmtti la not ilMiid ftHraally thara, bat
only In jajgnaati
ttot pttoparly na Intallaet; it doaa aot la that opwretlon know ita oira
of truth raqcolraa both tba axlataoaa of «lia thlac kaoMa and ita ad*>
thU Is fouod "la tho op«r«tlott of tho Intollset taklae tho aot of
set of bolag."
la affaetadt
II. m» BwroBifxcw
tha tarn daaigaataa tba oparation or tha ebjaetlYa tana of tha opara-
a uBioa.^ /«d aoa>aftlaaa it la olaar that tha aard haa a paaalTa aig-
Blfioatloa aad tbat it la aot tha rat of <iaayflaa<Hwg bat althar tha
•!%• rethar th«R th* a«t «f OM^paaaAiBC* 1S^« VMuItlac a«90«lt« b«iag
yaaaod «U.t« aeturally froM tho aotiva co^>oeitl«a on tha pnrt of tha
whl<^ la ooavooadod*
whlob tho oaa aetura hes to tha othsr cts a rsa«It of ths lw^>^ll^lHL
thiag that waa salA about jud^aant, aad tha poropoaltloa la alraa^y
Juvk a« It !• th« fosetlOB of jud«nuil %o usUY « nolti*
pXioi^, «aBbl.iBe th9 lnt«llo«« to grttp tho Mdigr «• ono, tho proposi-
of tbo Tropooiticy
tho OMM law oo«M alao to bo tukoa in a paooitro oonoo as tho piropooi-
ttf altieh It la tha subjaet.^ Afid this is Tsriflad not only la tha
tiOB and tLa aubjaet e« th9 matarlalt TrQ«41oatum aat t^wal para
U MllaA Iqr tha aaaa mmmi aa ttia •stologioal «ftja«t vhloh raaalTas
alsBlfy tha ao^pealtlon of tha reel thine, sad Ita parte In aoata way
raf leet the parte of the real ecHposlta. In lOMwlne ve plek out a
tliint •>* want to know aoaiet.bln6 ^bout lt« ^han wa dlaeoTM' thla aoRie-
the thine whleh la hnoMB, aad U&e predleate will repreeeat whet we know
•bout It. Ihua the aubjaet wlU et«nd for the auppoalte, and the pre-
euBkur as inasss.**^
Par ss autM
disltur tassss allq^d aUsal, (laod
—
Insst si ssmimfct rot lc a iwsprias dtfialtlsaist
fMstsr tes s«t«i q!ai««al4 iasst allsul dleltur
lassss pw Rssldaaa,*)^
J
CBiyyai nii fu* ««.
that thing oaa bo in tbo otber only by addition to ita ooaoaoo, and
•as of tha asaa two w^fst **Qnw qaod ftaadiaatvr a«t jdraadloattar par
baasttsa of what It ia« and iredioatad of tha aubjaet Iqr raason of its
in part tf •fiDW, tlw pMdloetion is ^SS, S3L* ^'^^ ^'^ <><>* "i^^u^ ^
two diff«r«at vagra. fbo prodioato aogr b« la tho dofinition of ^o Mb-
joot and bolcttig to ita ftom, aa liaa ia iaoliidad in %rXtMgiM» or animal
"
la b propar aooidast, or propwrty" in tha atrlet wmuf*^^
«if aaotLar thin^ i^leh ia mot ita propav Mdbjaat aad idiieh doaa not
Jaat, but far aoaa raeaea aictriaaie to that aaaaa^, but yat in tha
344.
thlBg sisBifiod Ml tfbjoet aad that aigaifiod h-m prvdioate; for «lifit«
•oaa bagroad «)Mt was said ia rassrd to ludflpmit . Ihara w aaw that
tha aaqpoaitim laeda \ff tha intelleot aignifiea tha eonpoaitioa of tha
tbias kamm aad dnara ita truth fniex it, ao that ^ tha eosBpoaitioB of
togathar. Mow «a aaa that thara ia aeaa kiad of idantity, aot ia tha
abatraat aaturaa, but in tha aoaarata baiag haTiag thoaa aaturaa; for
there ie identity of aubjaat only, (\nd not of nstura or foam; thigr teem
BMMtts* fh* oubjeot aiA ]«r«dl«»t« w <lw— tniitfa firaoi dlfrarent fbmw,
M.*^^ Iha tao ora oaa la raollty ("Ida* aaaaadua raa**^^) «id aat
raally tao dlffwaot &«turaa or aaaaaoM but oaa. /< eaaua aad Ita
•paalM aad anraa tha aiaculara of a apaalaa hsva tha aaaa aMoaM, aa
la^liad in tha aubjaat, aiaaa th« aubjaat aoatteiaa wra tbaa ita a»-
amea} and avan thia aaaanaa aaad aot ba aignifiad axplioitly in all
faraaea baftvaaa mabjaet and pradieato liaa in tha faat that tha pra-
«r« beaod txpon ualty In th« roalt the propMltlM aedo by eooQioaitioa
oa the part of the iatelleot reparMeata ttie reel uaity of that wblob
•ad pr«ileat« mrm dnoadUurtvd tram ddivara* tweam, bull %b» raal idntity
tationa of ttia natural ea tha natura of men ia both onlakal and ratlaoaX
and aaa ba t^nxapad aoowrdlsg to eithar aapaet fKHind in tlia aana oq»>
poaita aaaanoa and aonarata a^Jaott Jasran wtan tba aubjaot end pradi-
vwbal oofula tg^ ba.^^ lliia ia tta aooood of tha t«a wawnlnta whioh
ara aaaionad to tha word to ua. Tha f irat taanBlng ia tha aet of raol
1b« auHjAOt «ai pv«4iMr%« •an b« -ondflnrtoed as oa* b<M«w« th« pgr«di-
'Bau tbo oopoXa alc&lflas tba eot of balag of tba iataUlglbla eo»-
rathar elaor tram irtmt h&a just baan said. Aqaiaas o^Ieias airaa
tha aattav aad of tha eaaqpeslta, pflBrfaetiag Ittia potanojr of th» nattar
doas ttm fWRB asastitttt* tha aoa^oalta la tha ord« of asaanoa, but it
wdcas tha thlag oKlat, fiivine it its eat of baiagi *4uia foxBM ast
tM, habaas as^foalitav assa diootur,"^^ la ovdar thot tha torn, wgr
ba; toot to ba la %b» ast of ell oeta; nad just as tha fom la tha
and tha aat 1a lAilab oaapoalta thlaga hnta ttxalr realty, ao In ^a order
and, tbrou^ ia>l8, of tha real eonpealta lHiing» that wa als&lfy the sot
•f tha aeaqpoalta balag hjr tha varb to bo, Takaa by IteaXf It algnlfloa
•ff«ot«4 b«tli bgr tL9 Qoavosltiiw of lt« object and t^r our own eonposlt*
kaoea, fhme ttxe peeltlAa of the oopula Iqr the intelleet, by jolalac
aentt end thx«rae^ this operetioa it ie the sign of the thinit known
but not neoeeeerily aa being is the real o«dMr, but in iA«t«r« wior
it esiete ("eo ande (juo eot**^; for vAurt ic avprataended aagr not
uat esiat et least In the aoul, the cepola mat signify at least ansh
an act of beings
«i«i the T«rti t£ be is ths only predicate, aad the preposition contains
only a sub jsst aad ths varb to bSt as "Sssvatss is'*, thsa the J|£ be
.
ftor« lunr* oaly ita prlaoipal aaA yorl—ry in—nlwg of tb« a«t of aotued
rvttl b«li«t fiDV i% poalta tha aubjaet abaolutaly, sad wary absoluta
la tbia oaaa aanraa to Joia tba inradloata to tba aubjaot aad la piro-
parly eallad tho aajiiil«» tbaa tba varb ^ b£ doas aot ALraetly danote
tba aslataaea of tba avAtjaet but ita dateraiaatitta la tba ante of tba
pradlaatat
avt tba T«rb iS.^t ^^ tba Jolalag of tba pradleota to tba aubjaot,
trutb aad folalty of propoaltloaa, end aay tbat tbay ara rafarrad to
^minm^^^ p«g« 264.
by tho mibjMt (iod prodioate — tho «siat«iifl« of tho thing (or tarn)
Bttt einoe e toxm deaa not exist in a auAtJeat ualaaa it ia» asd nothing
the aubjaet rather thtuj with ita exiatenee that logic is ooneemed,
"far the logieiaa eonaidera the asds of predieatlon end not the exis-
positions eater into Uis stiidjr uerely i»s propositions* In the striot
no oooposition for logic to study, since there are not tee apprebsaded
%o aaipata aad join. And while they signify the a»st basis
mivrm yiu na*
or QUiddl^, it doeo not offer lofilo tantbmr tern to ooiq>ound with the
and thus eaters iater the uoeidenteil aBwetn of logie, thot of the ev
temel si^nlfleatioa of ixiteations. The direet oonoern of the lesie
teUeett
the true, «bo io %hm ooooo of Yerw oad ao^ eao in tho oonoo of felogp .
(oooo veraa):
tolloot to th« tblJis fcaom In tho ooaervto, atiU this kind of trutb
1« qjolto aeoldwtal to tho tblag vhicSx is kaovB, olneo tbo foot of it*
aaaidastaX pradlaatiimt
aaan that th«a la no raal ral«tlon balvan a tblag that la kamm end
A Batloaata 8aU»
aot In raelltyt
Quvtm nil f«tt
Attd its sot of cadLsttae* {—soj la not soRaorels^d la ooturtt but only
dariTinis mm raaaoa aad aslvtins ia raaaoat aad Craa mist waa said
to ba idantieal tbagr mst not ba two, but ona thing swaly riaaad n»
t«D« Itedar ita two aapaota tha thioe ia eonparad with itaalf end tha
ralfition of Idaottity sat up. But bsMuaa thara ava not tao rsaUr
diatlaet tanM* ttis raletion batwaaa thaaa taoms aaimot ba raal, and
Jsst of the reletioB, and the subjeet of the proposition is the t«n
of the relation. In temdnolesf *bis is soBOfSHhst ooafasing» hat ths
tion slcaify the swe thins ia reality, the sactr ws of the reletioa
are not recdly distiAOt« but only rationally so*
soul npon «hi«b it foilcms or in (what is ths scass thing) the aMumsr
fM sMb astares are joined together, cjid one eoiqiesite aet of beins
Ja a trus ssnss the opcretioa by idiiab the intelleet Joins the natures
on b« Mid to b« «!• feuadatioB ef th* rvlatioa MliiibUibtd, whleh la
th« proposition.
ftliro aapoet of tho rationeto baiag amtatltttta4 than with tha aatlTO
anat look «k tha diqpoaitloa la tba aubjaat of tha ralntlon for tha
aad a alga of tha thine kaoaa. It will hera Ita rasNfta fotmdetloa
m
luftb«u fuadoBMtua ia ro, ipaon uait«kt«K oovm
«• sltMio dioitur.M^
ant alaoo tbo unity is aol « porfoot fonaal unity ia th« intolligiblo
of boina «lii«ai aakaa Vum eoa. Ihorafora judonoa* "loaka to tho eet
asiataoeo.
JSSmBJiBmbES
fiPOB tha aaaa aouraa aa tha aaoaaaity of Jud^aant, BoMOy, tha inauf-
hanaioo}
howoror, ean wo af fixn that «io smo asn is wise, sinoo wisdsn dsos
ponds upon sinplo apprObianeicia for its aMtterinls, Ttxm first roeasn
n^hitti wo do sot apyrehond thro«||i the ssasoo «t elX, whether they are
seasee. for our apprehension is o|»eorod end beoadod iqr «ho liaito-
tiOM of tine and opooo, end so wo SMOt havo a Moaer of knowing which
thooo liadtatienst
•pj^rahwuaioa Mid JttdffMOt. Ofton «• era oot ocrtHln «b«tli«r two things
Ihaa tha qulddltlaa of tba two things epprabandad ara grftapad with
auffiolaot elarlty for tha Intallaet to parealva that thay ara Idaa-
tleal or thet tha ona la Inoludad la tba daflnltloa of tba otbar, tba
aa«b thing with this, end through this with tha otb«r* Baaauaa our
to lAiOh w« eaA giT* 1—<t»lf 8M«Btt for this rmmu v» Hurt arrlT*
at kWNrledg* Madlatoly.
ii»ll«a in R—wdJM
Ihu* to pzooood froR on* thing vAil^ «• knm to tho kmam"
iBtallaatuaX neturoi
of itaalf, and not tbroui^ aimathlng alaa. Tha laaa imn llataly tha
tat not yat tha tanaiaus, vft^i^ is ori4|iaalXy ualUMarat than, ihrofs^
httildiag, aad tnm tha art a aotioa of aoastroatioa hagias, whi^ tar-
of tha building*
—tiling ^rap anethar, la tha flrat aaaa bath »rm aaaa la oaa aat,
and tbara la no dlaoouraa; In tha aaoond etiaa tha two ara paroalTad
tUttvrt nwlflB aogiios««r« elit^d lA aliquo, «t aliquid
•s ollqttoi tfumlo Mda allquld in et]Li<iUO oognosoitur,
«M avfctt f «rtwr •og ww la tttr«in({a«, •leut ji«%«t
4MU1AB Hliquid ooewMitiir In all^iuB ut la foam 909-
MMAlblli; «(t tail* OegBitlO BOB ASt dlMurslTB, Stot
difr««f , (iMBtiai ad hoo, utruK allqiftid TidMitvr la
j^raprlfi apMl*, t<U, In %>«ei« allcna; tIkw «alm son
dloltw «eaf«nr« B«qa« Tldwdo lapidan p«r spMlaa a
lapld* aeeapiaa* naqu* Tldando U^idMi par ajua spa-
elm la (<p ttalP vmiXttaHnm* Sad ttia* dialtur •Xl<|ttld
as li4ua oognonel, q^aendo aoa aat ld«Bii B»tua laUkruar
>
Th* aianjla glTaa ia tha knoaladga of a aaaaa aad thM tha kaovladga
fhia aoMnpla vaa not ahoaan at raadoai, for it haa a daap aad baaia
MHMetlon with ^« prctblw of Muoaliw, M «• «h«U iM ihMPtly,
fli-igf Utar* Is la Alsaonra* a oao—aim of «ot« of eoih
een haive aaeoowilTft aots of oogaltloa «hiob sro totally unralntod, mMI
If alMt la aoilag la aot oaa b««t anqr* 'ttui aotioa la aat ana but
aarMTBl.
to aot{ tbla la Ita notion. Hot aby thla Motion? It eimnot ba bap*-
ta aatt
oo0ii|> « Iho voaaoa «lil«9i ttmn tlio oeMlttaion froo tbo proilooo lo
BOtlto QV oauao that piroaiita ^^(^ a aoY«MMit» ia olthor oaao tho steto-
aat will bo tnio aaA aypUeablo to tho pinAlon ooafrootlfis uo.^ doth
a fAoulty ty ««ii«h tho ooul nakoo tho traooltloa, aad a aotlTo for tho
Offipatloa ia ^ooi|l^M
VhOB it la a(^i4 that tho eoaeluoloa io oontalaod virtual ^
la tho proBlooo, it io iojpllod that tho laraniooo ooatala tho {srinolplo
sloa «bl«lk ooaatltutas It. Wa find eadia la tbls tost ths dlstlnetloa
Is aaanl tgr sagrlng that wo kaow tho aoaolttsloa flrasi tho prlnolplas.
*^ ^^ fc—g— St ^* prlaslploss
of ittAt ««o oaid dbOTO, that vo fiztally ooo tbo ooMluoion in tho prin-
oiploo. tiMt ronlljr tbo oorm thiB« io ooiA twon tno diffwoat TioiK
Mmb wo ooo tbo fttroo of tbo pari&eiploo i» ooojoMtiOttt wo ooo that tho
oonoltuiioa fiDllowa} that ia* wo ooo that wbao tbo pvioeiploo oro tikm
ia tho OBMbtood jviaoiploo. Dut at tho oaao tioM* ^Amkl wo thua ooo end
fMo tbo priaoiploo* wo ooo both tbo pviaoiploo togothor ia aooing tho
ooaolaoioa.
Tbm tmmtal priaeipXo io wprooaod biro thnt tho omo aat ia diraetod
to tho objoot of tbo aot aad tbo ooaditioa uador which tho objoot io
jroopad, aa both oeXor Mid Ilitbt aro ao«i ia oao viaioa. Elooahwo
Both tba thl]« aad tbo oMiltlM of ksMlag tho thlae om graapad la
tha ataw aet of oogaltlon, Jtiat oa tha nattar aad tlio foi* of a aatarlal
tkiv aaiat In oaa net of aaUatanea. tbla la raaXlr t^ •*•• point that
waa aada abora vhara « diatlnotioa waa «Rda batwaaa^MMMthiag tnm womm^
thlBft alaa nad kaowlas it iJft aeaattiiBS «]aa* "Xbara tha poiat la quaa-
ara alaarly Idaatlflad, tvt tha pflaeiplM aza tha aadia hy ahlah tha
eonolualoa la kaoaa, «Bd thalr paeullar foraa, whlcb laeda ta tha oo»-
oluaioa aad arokM aaaant, la tha Mpoat oar forraal eoadltloo undar
aoM* l^t tha ebora t«xt partloulerly onphaalzaa la that tba aMant
It aagr paftu^a aaoa atraaga that tha a«a» pMMiaaa idtotild ba oallad
both tha priaeipia or atntrtlag polat and tha aadlua of tha oparotlaa,
tha praniaaa aro w>ra than osa (at laaat iaplloltly). aad aa^ la lt>
aad ao ara tha atnrtlag point, throu^ thoir own ooavlaxity aaoa ia
ralatiea (aa «a ahell eoon aaa), thagr load to a nav aanpoaltioa, abiOh
ia tha eeaeluaioa*
affset.
•asM ta 999 so; for ba asja that to diaoaaraa^to affaata aad tnm
affaots to emiaaa lyalesfia oalj to the isttilaett not to saosat Ti»>
saasus »9& soluB iatallaotua."^ fha aanaa aad affaat aptdcan of bsera
ara in tba raid and phyaieal order rathar tbea in tha purihaXogiaal
ttd laeiaal, Vihat ia kaomi ia aoaa raaX tliiac, as tha eaaaa of aaothar
Md affaat, not abovt tha ygoaaa s of tha diaaavaa itaaif . «hs« a raal
eauaa ia kaowa frosi b raal sffaat, tha raal affaat ia tha 9aaiM9 of tha
ladga of tha affaat; so that, ahsa tha pioaaaa ia eeaaidarad, than that
«m wltb real o«i««%loB, but 1a aoMi «My 4«pm4« apott it* Bgr bwlag •
panda upon bodily aiaaa for it* initiation, it too paoaaa ttam petanoy
Mtariia world fom tha propor and pvoportiaaad objaat of aaa'a ioww-
naaa and drMBi<M ot tkMt world and tho anwatiea wlxiA offaata it,
ia mxth a ooaaaotioa olaarly eoald not ba usad ia aaaotly tba aceia aoaao,
not oaljr potaatiell7« but alao Tirtu&llyt tw, aa wwi aaaa abera,
aadata virtually:
qiuai m
prlnolplla danonatretlTla dadue«^tur aonal»>
ale, la Ipala quldin prlnolplla prnaoognltla preaao^
aoacltur eonelualo vlrtuta, noa entan i^etu} alo aaia
la ala praaaadatlt. Bt ale i^tat qaad nm preaaoa-
aoacltur alaplleltar, aad aaouadum <iuld.^
It matt not b« forcoflwi that, b«lBg retloniit* bclass, th^r «zl«t only
elaaay la baaod upon tba afflolaacor of tbo foeolty Itaolf • Juat bov
tks iBtoUoet «• luivs slrsadj sssa aoro than oasa*^' QBdor tba altar-
hansioa and judonaot; toe re^aonisg, bains Mnplaoc* aakaa uaa of ^pra-
pr«ilaaa « nd a eoneluaion la avldant firan what hea baan said. And bo-
but rattMir tha prauiaas aa oonjoiaad and giwine *%»• ^ tha oonaluaion,
tha Bost lapOTta&t thing to oenaldar la tha oonelualon; not, hovarar*
miaa tha oonolualoo la thua eanal darad, tha ^ranlaaa tatm said to ba Ita
But thara ara othar klnda of oauaallty invelTad, Iha prailsaa ara also
in tha eoHBantacy on tha Phyaica ahara tha fmir kinds of eauaas ara
ada up of ita parta, ao tha pvopaaitloas ara that out of whiab tha
oonelualon Is aadai
t
CBJUPCTH tX Pt»
yranlaaa axlat apart tnm tha ooaolualoa, htm aaa tbay ba Ita mtarlal
oauaa?
fit all^d «
flaaaa oauaan oatarlalaB, dixit quod aat as quo
laalti^Ofoaltlonaa aiitaK aust
Dia &aammr la that thay ara tha netarlal eauaa la aa andh aa tbay oo&p>
Iba tanaa aoatalaad la tba i^anlaaa wrnkm up thm aoaolusloa, aad ara
tbarafora ita Matarlul aauaa. But for tbla to ba trua tbay auat ba
locdK at tba tama ahl^ ara aoataAaad tbaara, but not at tba fora nndar
uhlab tbar era la tha propeeltloaa. For la tha eoaalualea tba aeaa
ca/jTut IX f«ii» SSI*
fMM tha «u^la of flour ead braud. Tha aattor fron wtiloh braed la
ada la floor. In tha laraad jMtarlalXy tta awia flour la praaant, but
< Ithottili tha aaaa tama ara firaad la both ttia aoaalualoa
•ad tha prcalaaa, ««• do not apattk; of tha eoaolualMi balag tha aattw
of tha pr«mlaaa» but rathar of tha ^rantaaa aa tha aatt«r of tha o«a-
thaa of tha alanaata aatarlae lato tha oo^pealtaj aad la thla aaaa tha
ooaolualoa la tha aoavMlta of tarm darlvad fMa th« pranlaaa, aad tha
tha eonelualon, wa hora aaaa, na both Ita aatariel sad Ita afflolant
t«ma.
thla la a OMvarlaoa, not of «9ty foma of tha niad, but of tha aaaalaa
of th« •ul>jMt aad pr«dle«t«. fHkat Is OMSt by th« pvsAioate Is
Vbsa this sidijoot is Mdo tho pvoiiosto of sons other sAjoot asd is
fosition,
AMthir torn iatsrroBss bsto ssa th«a. aad thrsvi^ tho aodiatioa of this
tsam tho two wo sooa to bo idsotifiad* this oeovro «hoa tho proposi-
with tho seoM aiddXs ta», sooa absa tho ffof ss i ti—s sro kasoa suo-
tho othor.
TL» ooAjimetlon of tb« tcnw of tk« oenolaaion is aot
ing Into eeoount tba bmummt in umioh tba ralatloa of pradioata to a«d>-
jaat vaa dlaoovarad and darivad, than mi auct «eaald«< ita raletloa
Tba Ralatlon of
baviac a aaaHOB t«na aadiatias %«o otbara, tbaa tba ralatloa of thaaa
%ho rolotioB of tho two proKiooo thwo foUooo tho rolotiMi of tho
bUj ooaotittttoo tho qrlioglai io aot tho eonoluaioa itoolf <tbe re-
Imt tho rolotlott bf ohieh it foUovo tern tho proniooo.^ Thio is tho
oisoljr OS noAistod* And this is Just tmothar wny of s^rille thot tho
through thoir oooBon t«rm. Iho rolatioa of tho oonelusioa to tho pro-
Bisoo is oao «ad tho sens rolatioa as that of tho praaaisoo tocoth«r«
for tho emiclusioa is ooastitwtod hgr th«t roletioa, from tho sxtrsmo
tacao that Iqr it aro Joiaod toe«feh«p«^ Huts tho ooaelusioa follows
ao^uMt apoa tho yr«iAsos aad ia thio rolatioi is r^atod to tto pro-
isoo. Tho pr— isoo, it is oridsat, oro tho tana of ttiat rolatioa*
niat thay aro too doos Bot ailitato asaiast tho uaity of tho roletioa
mat find na tha f)ooikAHtlo& of the raXatloiia irtiat tbaora la about tha
ba tha fonul laolaalon of oaa aattra — la tha alddla tar* Had of thla
Iddlo tarai la the other axtr«Bet ao that abaa tbeaa two fomal laelu-
aiaaa are aaaa toeethar, thagr ere aaaa to be the oae fiaaasl laelitaloa
predicate.
aeiiuaaae eea be traeed la both the fooaal aad efflaleat ordera* la the
the other, ead the eaaanoe itaelf la la a aubjaet.^^ At the aaaa tlao
th«r« !• a fottiidRtioa, r^al tho«fl^ r«n»t»a for ttui r«latlott of ooac*-
ttA •sttMitloa. aiaoo all oo^^Imi and oa«qMMii%o bolags lutvo fOt«a«y
la tholr nsturo as wall es sot, thejr nitst ban—s «bs% thagr «r« ligr
both thalr oei^laalty eod thalr 43rawiaa. Qila It doss bgr rsasoalag
aad His saassd aotimi it iavolTss. AaA bssaass v« ouraalTaa avo n part
aad aadar tha iafluanoa of thiags oatsida of us. avaa our iianatarial
oscaitioa raflaeta our aetars aad, ttursai^ met aatura, tha dsraaaian,
world*
Thw* rcMlM oAly th« tMk of drmriac %««««h«p «h« dovtrla*
of Sl« Umbm Aqulaao «k ttio dOHBltt of l«ci* Mtf tlxo aaturo of logioel
f|t lo LQglO?
tbo oabiat of aa aartarnsl HBtariel pro^tet» iosio oanaet fit barot far
villa BQT ita ordar to tbo ootpatioa of tnitb for ita own oako it ro-
;
MBblM «pMia«tlv« MUaMs. Y«t 1% ««M0t fit into Mgr of tha thro*
aaniad «ltb knoMliig raal thlnev vltbout proAteifig than, loelc atuAlaa
thla loslo 41ff«ra fron all otbor aelaaaaa) for ell other aol«ieaa ara
uat ba slTan e QlcMW bgr Itaalf* dlatlnot fraa oil othor aelaaaaa*'
iMtloa tha laatrutaaota aad tha galdaaoa lAileh It aaada.' Siioh guldaaaa*
afprHtaBaloa, Jud«MBl, aad raaaaalag, aad tor aaoh of thaaa thara wUl
ImJs to laio Mro iVpoorNMfl of truth, Hia third kind ena ba aoglootad
oseept to ho oa oao*a gwara agulaat it. Iha other two aarra a uaaful
pnp9m* Dialtt«tlM argOM f3reBi.g«M»el m oeaMoa prlaoiplM. Thwir
•olwieo oar to tho <pio«tloa undor 41ooaaol<m, appl/lBg f> aoro gMorsl
botvooa foro foA oppllod logic, itaro logle ( IokIoo dooono ) otudioo
eortaia oosdltions nad nonao tor tboir opplloetloB, Out tbo qppllo«>
lode ( Idgjoo ttt<no )> Puro lodo la e ooloaoo, evoo for dlalootloia
tlaa» boMorar, alneo tbagr do aot «ao prlaelplaa proper to anjr pnrtlou-
•m UMi) but lagU doM lot aiidt* «•• of dtwarmygitloat it ta«niXy atudlM
botb boiae unlTsroal &Dd «xteuli&s Ito all, thiats* BMtaplgrsios studies
sauaa thay do aot «ist as saeb la aatura b«t bavs tbalr baiog <wly
fr«B raasea, followlas iqwo tba anuuMV ia vdilah tho iatallsot u&der-
studlast tbagr fom the "aubjsst'' of tho seloaeo of logio .^ X^gis will
sitiMM aad arllOflisas, tba ooBtr«iry, tho a»do of irsdisatioa, »jid tha
boia« «biob is studiod aat liiooo prepsrtlao era sstt|0kt« la its prqpsr
s«M it doas aot asaa orarytbiag that ia oagr wiqr oatars iato tho
aoalag* Tttoaa nota sra ovta aald to bo tho *prop«r awttar" of logie.
Doaa thia jaaaa that thigr fom Ita ''eabjaetn It ecua&ot, boomaa tha
roilov ttpea Ihooo oota. Clonrly wbat follcwa th«i oanaot ba Idaattflad
vitk th«^ aad tho pvoAoota of oporationo aro aot tho oporatlmw tba»>
logla oaa and onot horo a eeaeom for tha op«ratl«ui of roaaoa wttheut
•tttdylBg th«B aa ita aubjaot. Tha lataotloaa whlcb aro ita oobjaot
erlaa from thaoo oparatloao ead aro dotMMiaod b]r tho bhuumt of thooo
oparatlOB iato oooooat* /«d wbaa it la aeid that lo«ie la tho ooioaeo
bjr whiah raaaoB ooaaidcra tha ordar ia ita owa neta, thia atimf mmt
ba mdaratood to ba ia aoMO mv Idantifiod with tho iataatlona or
tetitaoto BoiM^
artiowta boii« Coao oowtrtlaw (juod aat tnatun U MOto")
la froijoontljr diatiaiwiAod hr (jainaa tram vt\X bain^ ''whltii la dlTldad
«bi«li «• spMk «iv«a ttaB«|li ItMgr 4o aot re-^ly •xiat, th«t do aot hair*
a rutlQiuit* boiag*
baiag ika b^ag ia ita priaazy aaoaa, which la tha dlraot aad i^laoipal
tude* Ihia aaaaot be the aubjeet of ttie aalence of logie, than; ea-
tioa givaa for fauadod aoa-raal being, are we led to find the aub>et
ao tho ooaeopt of aun la iMMOilatoly ftoittdod upon rool «»• fto o^cr
orx •ImlXiir la «arproooloa ead la notion to thot glTsa for tho ottbjoot
of logiot thlo kind of rstloooto boiag lo doilaod bgr tho Intolloot ead
latoBtion
spsolos by ohleh the Intollaet lo Infosasd and aado liko mm» olhor
locioal intoatioao.^^
b«iji«« lb« font r«e«lT«d into tLe liitell««t la orlled ths IntAlllgibl*
isatiOMi of th« thing kamm.^^ Tbu« Informod tbo kaowar «etlT«ly •«>
pr««sM or ««t« out th« pnrt of ^« thing kaoim, m that tho aooldontnl
•ot of th« iBoamwr b»O0B>nn one ila intantlon) with the act of tbe thing
kniwflu The exiareeeioa within the intelleet la oalled «ia inkernal wevd,
tf tlie kB0Mr and eiqraMiac the thins kaoMa» baa a two-fold relntioa:
eaaaoee Beena the awa&ar ia whloh a niTan thing eauHroiaea ita net of
esietaoae, and HCtuiaiy exiata in ain«;uler roFtl thinga, and, %(han known,
the intellect kaowa, in a aore or leaa parfeot nad diatinct way, the
one upon the pluuilaaM end tbrou«h thia upon the ealatence of the nature
COWaJBHOri rag* 898.
tm amm !tr'"T wi««rlal tbiac* .nod m»tknn upoa th« wagr la «bl^
1^ r«fl*«tlag vpott lt««if th« lnt«ll«et «ca know it» onm epcretioa «aA
ft9V f'Tm wkiaratooA '*ia tho aaaoad plaoa"*, aftar tha thing Itsalf ia
nata baii^a ia olaar fiam tha feot ttuit tha Mtura aa kaoaa aaiata
oalj la tta iatallaat nad tha aoaidaata «hiti& fellow upoa ita asiataica
aal iatastioaa osiat oaly ia tha iatallaot that th«gr ara puro foxaw
takaa Into aaaamaft tba aetwraa of tha thiaga knoim. It is only ba-
e«uaa tha natara of apna thighs !• in tha Intallaot thnt 1oi;1m1 tBta»>
aaaidMit MR, Thara i«, howavcrg a aaiM im v^icjh et. fhaaaa apaeka
yriaatplM**, nthar tthaa tlM aattor of thiaga or tha ««y ia «hi^ tha
BalatlMi^
of oaa thlag to tacXtm*, But tha ordar of oaa thing to aaothar ia r*»
lation. 1%ia ia what «a buva aaan tha diraot intantioa to ba: tha ra>
letioa of likanaaa batvaaa tba intellaot &od tha thlag* Staea tha
Mai ••oldMit, 'Old for this r«K«B» v«l«tioa flnda h plaa* woat th«
Hitnih a ralatioa Mgr. IJLks otb«ar es«id«ots» taava its bains in a rsal
sotojaot, its toxml ohnrastar 4o«s aol asawnd this, sinoa ralntioa doas
OLanoots, as tor instanoa, if tha MAtjoot aad tarn ara not two roally
tlimitfit. tha ralAtion OMUwt ba raid. But slaeo tlui aotloa of raletioa
doos not dantAd its raolity, ths raUtion is not dostrarodi it rsnaias
Ui roasoft.
abiab "thaora oaaaot ba on erdor sad boarla« botwoaa tha ftivaa oat r —s
aoBoayt aooordiag to tho apprafaansion of roaom'*, tuid wlthia this ooaas
of tha Ibttcr ara amm ead spaoias.'^ nrast both tha axmaplaa ^^nd
roel thing eo aMoh, nor tho notiBPo oooerdlag to Ito oboelttto eonsld«rn-
tlOB, bal tbi natttvo oo ooneoiTod nsA under tho oondltlona of thlo
vpoB tho oporotlott of tho Intelloot and ottrlbutod to tho thins kaom,
Intantlon of UnlTaroallty
paaaoo fraa potaaagr to sol botti la roswd to ttio oparxtlM and la ro-
forA to «IM!% U aj^ppiliMdaA: «• f^r«% lauw la na vuiaiff«r«Bti«t«d wejr,
Dm i«l«llaet la balae. But ovr kaaaiadlsa Aoaa not raat thara, <'a
Mhet kind of balng tha thine !•{ thot la, Itjapprahaada tha quiddity or
Mattw cad aaadltimia of tha thing} sad tharadTara, without la any tragr
daogrlag tlM raal aotlatattoa of tha thing. It Anprahanda tha thing only
daimi, it abatmata froa tha ladlTldual aattar of tha thing, Ita aool*
daala, aad Ita atngalar ooda of «alat«aaa, Galy thua aen tha form of
S8
tka aaaaibla thiag ba itevad bgr aaathar batag/
ThHi It Is aaaa to 'o9 aaa darlTad froa naoy, orar aad abova tha many,
o«t iat«Btlo« oyproh— a oaljr tho oktura «bA la ao way rof «•• it to
tlM Mogr twaa aaa dad t99 ttalvaaNmllty. Tbo intoatloa of univwaellty,
hawovw, ia aak the iiet of oaB^exlaMi, but the relation that is set up
the reta ea reel, htti a«rel/ ua4ar the aapeat la whltii It la oaaqHValila
latirtiaa af ttrlbattlo>»
aacy to briag tosathar tba apir^Mudad aapaata of the tbias aad aoaipeaa
tiaaa of adataaoa.
Mjr thiasa aa nagr, it oca kaair iu«y if thay aaa ba Inrauefet into a
aiatla Tlaw* Ihla oaa ba daaa bjr aoMparlas than, for oorraletlToa bt9
loan togattiav,
fM»« bat in tha oonoarata aubjaat« tea of tha natwraa la aaan to l>a
talXaet nttaata tkat tha thing la &a tha inteUaot rapraaanfta it.
ecoKsmsm p«c« 808.
apyvaliaadad aatiuraa t««iihw «iA wi^ tha vmX oonoz^a thiafi whiah
part, ataMi«B t»r Idia aiippoalt ia iAi9h. tha aatwra aliptdfled by tha
pradiaata axlata.
— arloally aaa or ona In aubjaati that la, thiy adat tocathar la eaa
QtSKB^: P«ft« aCMI.
of ita iaf«rior» tha aaoa aaMpaa ia daaiffwtaA t^ both svdijaat eoA pra-
it.
varbel eopuXa to ba« 13ia aet of baiag sttributad to both aubjaot ea4
tha thias rapvaaantad tgr tha aubjaot. Baoaiaaa tha thiags of tha aatar-
ial world which «a propwly kaov, aadat «a eoavoaita, wa uaa tha aovd
thtkt tba aoapoaita haa ita aot, to ba^ vhaa tha aattv haa ita aot,
tha f««a« Ite to ba ia tha not ejid parfaotioa of all aota. So too
IB Ilia ordar of aegaition, tha eoR^oaita (tha aaaaeiatiMi} jLa ahaa tha
3S
so wo sew la Chapter IXI, that logle emisidsrs the true tod the fttlso,"
Whet is a»e«t is, not tbet logie studios the relation of real things
b«l only ratisaeto, booeuse in the relet ion of identity ^soro ere not
to the subjeet, and tharel'ore the ivedieete la the subjeot of the re-
But, ore properly, lot^io oonsidera the formal foundation, whioh hare
iBtontlon of Ooft—gmwteo^
•aa thlag to aaotlMnr, Aran tho kaown to tho uakaowa* sinplo eppr^
haaaiaa Aoaa aot ravaal mnn^ about the thla«i tvprotiandatt aad la not
ebXe to attala to thlaca «4ilali do aot fall aadar tba aaaaaa* Saaaoa*
las anat aanply t^f tbaaa dafaeta aad aaat lira o«rtltttda irtiva arl-
point of the anvaaaatt tba thlat flrat knotra, la Ita prlnelpla; tba
alea frcaa tba prlnolplaa or pranlaaa, but aot Ja the pr«daaa; for
alMa oaa tbiag la kaoaa la oaothar, the tao ara kaoaa at tba a«aa tlaa.
Bat, la raaaoaiag, flrat tba prwlaaa ara kaovi la th«aaalTaa, tbaa after
that tha aaalaatan la kaawa tarn, tba fcaoaladsa of tba pvaailaaa. For
tba truth of tba oonelualoa la pr aaaat la the pr«nlaaa tram tba flrat*
mmmmu tm
JBEBBEBBBBdK
P««t 306.
MV« than thatt 1^' tho suooAMloa is eaueea. th« iWfBMMtt of thou«^t
throoi^ tho priaolploo. for whoa tho foroo of tho praolooo la ooa-
la tlio li^t of tho yroRlooo that the truth le oooa. 1!ho aoaoat to tho
alioro there io aotloa. the yraaiooa ejpo offleloBt ooiioeo of tho eon-
Ihooo ere Ito perto aad aaterlal ooaooo, the propooltloao iimedlateljr,
aad tho teow throttgh the jwopooltioao. Iho propooltloao mr* tho
mlM of tiM ««HM soMi la rolatiM wiaflh limiim tlM wtlTo for
ea having eaotbor fbm vlthin it. nran this It followa that tha saooad
this deaa not dorlva froa Uta iwonlag of tanaa tafean In looletion, hut
froM th«K ao (MmtUy aigaifiad ia tha propoaitlon; for thara tha oaa
in
!• oaan in tha other, msilarljr, it la aot^tha propoaitiona in Isola-
tion that tha inolualon of tha aaoond pradioata in tha firat 8td>Jaet
io p«realvod» hut only atioo tha t«o pvopooltiona oera oospirad. In this
tioa of tha aubjaat aad iraiioata thaaa^ • alddla t«ni; for thaaa &f
hat too aa;inaol<mi of tha aoao ralation.
«pd«r U raal •fn«l«ift Muaolity, 1iy whiofa fteM «r« MUMd to Infom
Hivo «ro Mvaral polatt that iriioitIA ncvir «t«iiA out ia ro-
tlOB, Tho first is that it io not oonMnioA with tho roal hut with
istoBtioiui of roaaoa that follow nspon tho toanair of kaowinet »aid ttiaao
Intaationa ara ratioaseta baini^ having thair «a«taaaa fvoa aaA ia vae*
•oa, Iha aaaoad poiot ia that though logio ia aot ehout tha raed, it
ia not aat off fton tha ra(d. It is aat "tnTml" ia tha sanss that it
ara trisMA asaerdlag to Iba vrarioaa ralatioaa «4iiflh thagr havs as a ro-
salt of baiag kacam* Ihssa ralatisos ara tha iBtaatioas aad tha retio*
aata baii^s «hioh follov uixm tha oporatiom of undwataadiag; thagr ara
tha sitfijaat aliiah loeie stadlaa, la tha lo^:;ie of est. Thwas^ tharafora,
of rooaoa to knew tho roel;^ •&! loelo otmroo as tho Intarael gulda
put thlcsa lA iv4ar «&d to ord» thlaga to thalr and: ''ratlottla aala
oat erdiaaro bA fiaam."^ Sgr logl* voaaoa dooa tbla tor itaalf. Iharo-
fore logic atudlae ordar In tho aata of roaaon.^ Bui ordair la ralar-
affaota ara soaa la aaaaaa ead tha orlglaally aakaoMa la aaaa In tko
P«g« 310.
V4» SIl.
(1910),
»• UaaAoMMt la Jgjw 4ortto uttthtctlQUOo
holds (OH apuriouo boeoooo not la tho
^^. Tbowoi d* Aqma
''effleial oadolo^ao.*
soo tho tablo, p« 108 far do Prop . I4odol. (a. 34), do FoUoolta (a. 86),
do Nftt. Aoo. (a* 90) , do Ilot . Qon. laTfS) , «ad p. 109 for Jo Prla .
ladiv . (a. 104) , aad ottppl«aaBC«i^ aotoo oa j|£ Bat . Qoa. (p. UO) aad
do Pria. laliT . (p. Iftl). Xa hlo oditioa of tbo OjpttOOttla (19S7) bo
Slvoo la vol. ZV Mong tho vU dubla ttio ^
Prop , lodal . (p. 908) aad
tho do Fallaollo (p. 006) t tho root ho plaooo la vol. f oaoac tho
pp. SO? 4 aae - nst do prop, ^^odjoi. . pp. ao? st vni m.Ml» iS£«*
pp. a07 & nWt ifi Ifii. i£*» pp. 907 - aU & 899)
ptctsia.
CBAPTHtl
8. I U9/t ,, 1, a. 34.
7. VI ieth . 3, a. 1151.
e. VI B^. «, a. uao.
U. I «t . 3, a. 07.
12* d« Trto . 5, 1 ad ^.
17. dj Trla . 5, 1 ad 3.
19. II*II 47, t ad 3* Th* fset aad aatura of this logleiO. pro-
daot will b« atudlad aon la datall forthar oa in thia (uad aubaaqant
ohaptara.
88. VI »h . 3, a. USB.
»• ma., na. USl L 1163. .
M. X^ll 57, 3 0.
M, d£ Trtn . e» 1 •« 3.
S7. I lArt. 3, a. M.
IB. X-tl 87, S ai 8.
'^* is J^lfi* 6, 1 ad 4,
99, a. 8.
86, n, 6«
41. Ibi d., loot. 41, a. at of. loot. SO, a, lit ?;ola&tla aat
m
a prlnoipilo ad ooaolusloaaa.
*3. £• £. 1. M.
(hablta*) MMluslonlfl «x ocMSis.i VI SM>. 3, n. U49t selMstla Mt
kabitw AOTMMlrtttloals, idMt «« <l«Mtturti»Blilona eeuMtuai II-II 58,
9 9,1 3«l«aii« mH rvote retio aolbillm.
31S.
CBAPTBR H
1* Z dj^^* 1* &• 3 (•«• Firotta).
S. D« TrU » 5. 1 «•
5. Ibid .. «« 4.
4. XI im» . 7, a. 8866.
U. VI JHI,. 1, a. U88«
18. Ibid. , a. 1189.
1S« XI u«t. 7, a.
n. I iftija* I* n. 9.
»• U liat. S, B. IBM.
86. I-II, 16, 1 0{ ef. VI J^. 8, a&. 1131 Ik U93t Ip«a varitaa
ratlaaia praatiaaa aat ra^^a raotitudlBla appatitaa. dirae aa qtaaa
aaat ad ftaaa. . • • iat aafca alaatia a^yatitua aonw ^aaa aunt ad
87. I kth , 1, B. £.
\, TZ 1th, 7, a. 18U.
W, £,a. 1* 4| cf • I IMt* 8, B, 46} lata toientia, (joa* aeplantla
Hiclit'arJ't^umerla alt prlata in dignltnta, ast tanan ttltlaa la addlaeattdo*
41« I ft^. 3, a. Of •
^« ^ Trta . 6, 1, aal« t aA t*
4». da Trta . 5, 1 ad 8.
44. I Farih . s, a, 3.
^« ^ frim , 6, 1, aol. 8 ai 8.
46. VZ Hh . 7, n. 18U.
4f . II ^l^. 6, a« 986.
51. da Trta. 5, 1 ad 8*
93. da l^la . S, 1 ad 4.
es. ibia .. a. 0.
64. II»II, SI, 4 ftd S| of. »Iao «liet toUowB oa th« dlatlaotton
of the doetriao Ma4 tho uoo of leglo. 3oo nlao 4o Tri^ « 6, 1, ool. I.
M. rr iio». 4, a. 674.
M. I root , ^aal . 1, a. 4.
tharo otm hardly ho amr (|ttoatioa of ita toaahiag '^la othw aoiiooa*.
Hmto la oTldodlly wollilnu dofootivo la thla toart. '<^o ahoald ooqtoot
•OMOthias llko thlat "• • • propoaltloaibua qfueo tradkuilar la locloa,
|TC«t aoft doooM" aia^Ur, or. If tha oalttad «»r«a aro to ho kopt, thcgr
oottld ho addod i<ift«r thoao alroady glvaa, with m oImbco howovtr of la
iQgioa to op logloa. aot **pvoiit aoilioot utlaar «« logioa la ellla
.3u« a roodias, howorcr, la aot fhmd ia tha oditloRa.
aoiontlla." .'31MB
Vlvfta laprovoo oa Vmam alt^itly hgr iaaortlag a ooanai "proat aoUleot
utSaor la lo«ioa, pi«ttt oM doooaa, la aliia aoloatlla*; «&d thla la
tho Toafling aloo of Yoaloo ltfS« Ihia raasvoo tho eiOMlj of havlag
lodo toa«h la othar aolaaooo hui loaroo «A»th«r —
txylag to aao tho
o«w pooyooitioaa la legie aad la othor aeloaooo at tho arao tlao.
Qm Uc^l odltloa (HOM, 1881) frw tho imtogrttph oodoa, by oalttlag
tho lA with tho a oooad logioa. BMkoa fairly good aoaaot "... propeal-
tioaihtta qfttfto traduatur in lo^loa, provt aoilioot atlmr logioa prout
aot dooana la allla aelantlla." Thla U
atlll aot aotomrthy fior its
llapidity, bat at loast it dooa aot iavalTo a ooatradlotloa. fho «oaa-
lag la that la othor oeloaooa «o oadco uoo of tho poriaoiploo oaqprooood
by logio (aad thua wdco uoo of loiKle}, ead that thooo prlnclploo aro
\
«
71. n>i4 .
^*» i» SSL" »t ».
7S« do pot, 7, 7 Bd 1 in oontr.
79. roirfurthw aaci«Bflaa aoo I Poat , aaX . 43, aa« 1, fi, i^ 9| loot,
44, a. 6{ VZI Ijat, U, a. 1536t loot. 17, na. I«48 h IMS.
M. C.G. 1, X.
100. I Perth . 2, a. ^.
104. I ^:th . 1, a. 3.
4. I a^. !• a. a,
9, I Partli . 1, B« 8.
6. X ?^oat . ;4>aX . X« a« 1,
T. 1X1 is j£. U,
aa. 746 k 747; ef. 71 llat. 4, a. IBSCt lataX-
laettta bi^bot teaa •paratiaoaa, (juaruB^vuwwontiv ladlTiaibiXiun lata!-
XUt«Ktia, p«r qiuai lataXXaotvM foaast 'aWueaa aoaenptiooaa rana
lataXlicanio ^{BOd QUid oat UBluaouJuaqiia rol« Xl« op«riitlo oat p«r
^um eonpoait at AiTidlt.—! r>ant« 38, X, 3 aoX.t Q^
dupXas opar^tlo
lataXXootaat lyui ^aao dioltar a phiXeaopbla fonaetle <|tta aRMMbwdlt
qjolddltetaa ima, qioao otlm dieltar ladlTiaiblXlum tataXXigaotla.
AUa oatflB eea^ribaadit aaao rai, owyoaaa^K) ofriXMatloaaa.— do ^^Ig,.
6, 3 o.t rupXte oat oporetio iatOXXaotua. Uta qiaea dleltur lBt«XXis«»-
tla iadivlalblXivB, qua oogaoaeitar da u&a<iaa^eao ro quid oat. 'Xla
«o 08t qua eoapoait ot dlrldlt, aalXleot oauBtlatloaaa aagetlTva
aX afflxsBtlTOB fomando.
8. I Parlh. X, a. X.
*• ^ £SSi* i]252k* ^* ^* ^* ^^
ofimtHiMM of apoouXatlTo
aro dlff araatXy onuBMratod fraa tha tlbofi 'TEiabot GUt«a ratio teoa
aotua, atltn ammdnin qjuod aot apoouXativa. Prima aat ao^paaira ot
dlTldaro} ot lata aotoa ratleala axiariBitur p«r oratloaaa. • • soeaar*
dua aotua r«tlonla aat dlsounNva da uno In aXlud laaotaaoaadl amiaa;
ot aoaaadoa boo arUeeiaHBa oratio qfuaodaa dleltur** (IT Sort. X8, 4.
X, aoX. X)
U. IV Mgt . 4, a. 674.
<M. do Trln . 6, 1 ad 3.
tf . II>IZ, 47, £ •« 8.
M. I-II, 90, 1 «d S.
SO. X ^sl,. 1, tu M.
31, I do^« 1, a* 3«
87. I, 1, 7.
88. Ahp e ftOlor dlsouaaion of tblo point ooo boloo, Inttar port
of Cb. Y, oa aoeoad latoatioua.
40. VIZ ^ot . 13, a. 1876; of. do Het. Ooa. o. 7 (fin.): (jiMBtan ad
pvaodlostioaam, qtaao aotum ratloalo diolt.
43. 300 tbo laot sootlon of Ob. VIII, oa tha proposition (p. •^3^).
89. I, 16, 1 0.
60. IMd .. « 1.
68. Ibt4 .. 1, a c.
68. VX Hal. 4, aa. 188S, 1831, 1888-86, 1848{ &— cdaa aa. 1888,
1887, & ISS^r
81. I, 68, 3 ad 4.
84. VII ^oat. 9, a. 1489 1 foxnu totloo, qjMa aot Ipoa (jialddltaa
apaalal, dlffart a foxaa pertla, aiout totwi a pavtoi mm
qiiidditaa
apaeloi eat aoapoolta as octaria ot foma, aoa tw—
oat bae foxaa ot
as baa laatiiria ladiTldM.
8, T teat , 9, n, 896.
4, do In * S, 4 ed 6.
^* i£U£* iJSE* ^» '< ikinttta 0Mtea (aBtiu^ ast aorun qua* bob
auBt ia raruB Batura; aad la aola oogitaitiBBat qmao dieuatur antia
retiaaia, ut ganua, apooiaa, opinio at trnjuaoodi.
U. I-II, 8, 1 ad 3.
^« II SSSi.' ^*^ « ^» B* ^*
15. da Yar . 1, 1 e.
IS. I-II, 9, 1 0.
B4. da m.
9, 7 •« 6; of. Ibid . 7, 6 a.(aad«— ad. Uariatti, p.
198 a, bot.Tilalallaattta aagatie&la aipar ftttdatiup in aU^pM affi3^•
atlaaa.
89. I, It, 9 •• t,
89. da Var . 3, 4 od 6.
87. I tarlh . 8, a. 3.
I. I-II, 12, 1 O,
<• P* 17.
8. I-II, l^, 1 8d 4.
6. tm V«£. ^1, 8 ad 5.
11. da Yar. U, 3 o.
U. II Sal. 19, 1, 3 ed 1.
16. Tb«r« 9n
othar taactt whara iiwl^te iatallijaibjlia rjui ictaptlo
iBtaUUibilla ara intarabans^d, a.g.. I. 88. 1 &d 4i I >mt . I, 5, S
ad 4; III i* ^. 8, n. 710, In da Vair. U, 1 ed 11 iqteation— lutal-
ligibllaa la iataTCbai^ad with foiwaa iatalUgibilae . aut In^antlo
iataUifcibllia na«na Xeci««a intaatiwt djt G«nau 15, a. S13{ XV Mat .
4, a. 5X4; III da ^« 8, a. 710.
80. 4m jfalo 16, 8 ad 10; at. II. jja i£« IZ, n« 377t oogaitio aitma.
fiTp** ^0 'Jtu>d eecBi%«i a«% alivfn* aede in eosaoaaanta, aeilloat
aiailitttdiaaM. Kaai aogaaaaana ia aotu aat ipaua oogaitiaa la
aotu; also I da ^.
4, a« 43; & III ifi n, 13, a* 789.
81, I, 4, 3 e.
tt. I, 88, 1 ad 8,
n. I, 88, 3 «•
84. Ibid, ad 1; of. Ill da ja. 13, a. 7G«i )!oa atttaai aaina aat ipaaa
raa. . ., juia lapia aoa aat ia aaina, sad ^paaiaa lapidia. Et par huno
odMB dloitur intallaaitaa ia eata »mm ipatn intaileataa ia aatu, iaauao-
toa 9p90i»B intallaati aat apaeiaa intalle«tua ia »eta.
88. I, 17, 8 a.
M. n Ut^, 4, a, 1234.
27. I, 14, 4 a.
81. juidditjr—jMdl* 8, 4 a.; 1, 17, 3 a.; af. Ill jfia jjj^. 8, a. 718:
iatallaotaa iataUi8it aat (^uidditaa nuao aat ia vAaa; I, 88, 8 a.
8 ad 3; a. 6 0.; do Tar* 1, 12 o.; £.0. Ill, 41 (p. 886 a, top); I 8arHi .
3, a. 3.
atar o aodl, 8, do.; I, 14, 18 o.; of. I, W, 1 ad 5; I, 84, 7 &.
8 0.
• nodi , e, 4 0.; of. do Tar. . 7 ad 4 (oooaad aorioa):
»
tf 333.
33. d» Fiif ct Sf . 0. 1«
85. X, IS, 9 «•
36. I, 93.
40. !, U.
41. p. 440 a.
43. p. 44& b; of. da Var. 4, 1 o.; uoda vavtan interiua aat Ipaua
latarlua IstellaetMB.
81, I, 4, 3> a.
n. It ali^flaa tvm m
mr%m ral. balag nova abjaetlva tttiui
aolaatlB or Ido* (I Sfft. 36, S, 2 ad 4); oouplad with <]i»iddlt7 (III
ff». 8, &• 8 aoDiltia ttiat «Ai«i ia algBlfiad bgr a amm (I gy» .
S* !• S aal.; ^.^^ I, U: aod«B aodo a ao aaaa aat pod ran« at atMDlnia
ratlOBA); It ia Iha daflaitloa (I 3Mt. 33, X, 1 ad 9| ZV^^« 16,
a. 7a8( I, 19, « ad 8) aa aifiBHytaTtha qmidditjr (Til ISat . 18, n.
1337; Tligl. 7, a. 8S4}| dafiaitiao alsalfiaa ^tiddity Wl
^SSL» U*
a. 1088) aiaqgaataly (da Yar . 3, l ad 9t iatallaetua ... dafiait • .
^laaaie aaaeipit all'^um itonaw da tpaa ra (juna par anaia ipai rai
raapaandat); but aot arary rirtla ia a dafiaitioa (YII Kat» 3, a* 13£5|
laat. 4, &• 1339); ona thiag or turn oaa hanra aaajr rationaa (da Pat.
7, 4 a & ad 4 - 6; I, IS, 4 a & ad 1 - 8) aeaardlag to tha diffaraat
vigra ia wbioh it ia ua4arataad (ibid , f^ da Yar . 8, l a, ad fia.}.
8». £.2. lY, U(p. 446 b, bot.}{ ef. C.G. X, 631 iutaUaetua .
• • tunSCUkaaipao iataatioaan rai iataiTaataa, ^aaa aat ratio
ipalua, <i«Mi aiflainaat dafiaitioi £.0, II, 78 (p. 179 b, bot.}:
id T«ro ^pted iiitallieitur, aat ipaa ratio rarun aoEiataativn extra
6». IbU .
69. Q,±0 ZT, U (p. 444 b, bot.).
?«• A» T«r. 10, 9 e (M»d.); ef. I, 67, 3 Oi 8«t atttim alius lii%«l>
Isotus, aeilievt hoownM, *ttxi nM
Mt mmbb ictslligar*, n«e aul lnt«l-
llg«r« Mt obJ««twi ivlnum lps« vjus esMBtlK, •^ nliqaid •ztrinMMWi,
••ille«l natttva BatcrlalU r«i. n
iteo id qiied priao aoffioseitur ab
iiit^l««t« bmMW Mt httjuaEMdl dbjMtoBi w% ••euadario oogaoaoitur
ipaa «o%tt« que oegDoacitur objaotom; at par aotun eosaoaeitor ipsa
iotallaottta, ealua aat parfaetio ipmrn iiitalll«ara. St idao ftilo-
•opbtts dieit vittod objaota praaeogBoaeuaitur eotibut, at aotua potantiia.
II da ^«
6, &• 308: Intallaotua peaaibilia ooatar oogaftaait aaip-
auB par apeaiiM iatallisibiXMi. • . om
«at«i lottMBdo aataoftiaa «imb
dlraata* R
idao oportad, qood in aoe&itimiam jproaateaaa al> bis qfiwa
aunt nagia astrlfUMoa, a t{aibua eb«%r«^untur apaoiaa intelligibllaa,
par qua* Intallaattta iolallislt aalpaiiK) at aailiaa* par objaota 009-
oae—ua aotua, at par «otaa potantiao, «l par potatBEtiaa oaaaatiaM
aalaao. SI autaai diraota aaaaotias mmm oo(pDao«>at eaiaa par aoipOMt,
aaaat ooatrBrius ordo aarraiidaa in aaliaaa oogDitlttao; quia «pM8to eli*
<iald osoat proptaqttlua aoMotiao eainM, taato priua OBsnoooaratur tto
oa,
SSSL* ^SSiL* ^t 89 (od fia«)t latoUootua intalUeaas per a««
(ipaoiao iat«Lll<lblloi) sunm objaotun radootltur augpra soipaun i»>
talligaodo ipom oqwb iatalliftaro, ot i^weiaK <gxn iatoU-lglt,
77. I, 1 ad 10.
88. Umi t«Bui fir at oad wooad IrttjPtlop mmbi to ooeur is th«
«rltln<« of at. TbauBm only la ooajuiniB'tioD with th« irarA '*aoua'' to
AlstlBgaiilk "aouas of first IntMitlon" tvum "aonma of soeoad latwH
tlon". Tb9 OAly ooeurrocooo I hvf fotrad ur« ell ia e eoatott dl»-
tlagBJrtiing tto torna ladlTldual, •itit!:uilar, pertieulsr, ouppoalt,
pwaoa, lqrpo«taalB» t^ad r«^ thlagt
X a«it . £5, 1, 3 sol. («at« iasd.}i ladlTlAuam duplleltsr potsst
slgBlfloarli •! p«p aoiDsa sseuadss latactioals . sleut hoe aonsa
iadiTiduuia« vol sltv^lATS, quod aoB sigaiflont ram slagulwam, ssd
lotsntloastt slavularitetist vol nooMo ^
p^slotsnt teals , auod •iff-
alflost rgk» eoi oonvsait lattotlo partleulerltntis. (U&dflrllaiag
of Panas od. eban^ssd)
I 3<Bt . 26, 1, 1 «A 9} ZadlTiduiBB aubataatles dleltur duplioltMr;
Tel ax 00 >imC aubstet aaturaa, v«l ax so mnoA aubatet sceldantibua
et ^^ropriatfttllius; at vjoaatua bA ntaraatqua potost algalflearl par
ygtasa tataatioaia. vol par aonan aoouadBo latoatloala . rear
arlasa taapoaltloala al^lfioatur ut aubatat atsturi^a, hoo aoiolaa
roa aatiuTbO} at par aoaaa aaottaaaa iHBPoaltiOttla. hoe aoiBiBo ^voA aat
auppoaltuB. ^i^iaollltar laqueatun mbatat ^roprlatati, alemlfientw
ooedaa prlBoa iaposttlattls* quod ast neaMn hypoatesia val paraooaa,
at nnwtnao aoanmiao lapoaltiattis, q^Md oat siaeulMrOt ut iadlTldaua.
d# Hat. Qaa . e. 13 (ad. I'am., prlB.}( t^oaiaa prlmHO lataationla
swBt tfiB* rabtta siurl laposita absoluta aMdlaaito ootMoptioao, que far-
t«r iaiollaottta ai^ar ipMai ran la so, ut hea» val Isplst aoniaa mtan
soeuadtio lataatiottis aunt llln (fMs ii^ponuatur rateus ooo soeaaAoQ
(|«od la so mvB/tt soi aawuidiw quo* ssbawit Intaationl qufln iatolloo>
tas faoit dfS sis; ut coa dlMturt boaw oat spoolos, aalsiel est eoaas.
Aa altaraetlvo aaprossloB, olraody gurt la tho soooad iaact ^uDtad*
la "aoua of first cor aasoad toaoatttoai XXI aaat. 8, 1, 1, aol. It
Ctsi OHM pavtioolaro hsbot roq^oottn ad aatunsi acaamaam at ad pro-
pristatast potsst aaawaftnn utrtaaqiBS rsspsetua aosdiurl, tun par aosMm
pripas iaposltisaiSt tun par aoaMa ssouadas Intag^tloala . lioe autan
nasiSB rss aatarss oat aaaum ariffiy ji^yosltloals. ajjtalfloaas parti«
salsrs par rsapoatua s« aataran aasMsaaas boo Toro aoasa suppositua
sat aoMsa ssaaaflas lapositioais. 8l4paficaaa Ipswa habitudlnan par-
tioalavis ad asturaa oooBuaaa, laquaatua aubslstlt la oa; partioult«a
Taro, iaqoaatiai ssosAltur ah as. sad q;ttia aoaldaatla ooaasqauatur
aaturaat idoo oaas aomaa dssigaaas partioularo aaouadua rospeotua
ad pr^paristatss* dssleaat stiam ipsua rsspsotVB ad aatum ooBBuaaa.
Bso arts potost fisri duplioltart rA par aeaaa artaas laposltioais i
at ale ast hypostasis ooBMunltar la onxlbus substaatlia, paraoaa Yoro
la eamlbtts ratloaallbuai r^l par ooaMa sooiy^das ipyosltloala. at ale
ost iadlviduuBt InviuentuBi ast iadlTlsua la sa, aiagulera «« Imiu^atUB
ast dlTisua ab alila; undo alnoilara sst ld«n quod dlTisuD. ost atlaa
alia dlffaraatU sttsadsada later Istat quia quaodoa Istorua slKnlfl**
saat eoaaawitar parttsttlaro la <(uollbot oaaarsa sirat partleulare,
ladlTid\iua« staaalarst ^aadm varo tnatum partioulara la gaaoro
substRHtias* slout fm na%\sr&; •oppoaltm, hypostasis, st psrsoB*. . •
(.tM&jTlB h«s« albsdo Tsl base maaa dioatur laaiTiduun tsI siagalara,
MB tsBSSi potsst iioi tgrpostasis, sttpp«Niit«Ri, Tal rss naturss.
X saM, t, 1, S sol. (prill.) t Nss %tmm boo aoRan wtlo slgAlfi-
as% ipsoi asBSsptlsasBf ^la bee aisiklfieatur par aonan . • . rai;
ssd slgnlfloat InlaBtlSMB hujns ooBoaptlmils, sieut at boo soans
dsflnltlo . si alia aooiiaB ssoiiaaas laapositlsais.
first lotsKtlsa asuss signify ths l^xlas, bsosnss tbs oonoapt wblab
sdlatas thsir tiastng Is oss of first Intentloa. rsprosaiitiius dlraotly
tbs s3Kt4VBal rsai iaili«« a soswa Ifllantiim aosas tiim^tr aa istantiSB
•f tbs vasr la sbiih tbs tbii« is ssaosirsA (rotbsr tban tbs dlrsst estt>
aapt of tbs tbiag) or a rslwtloa to the ooaeslTsd ni!«turs ("ipseai bsbi>
, • • s4 astwoB soHnasB"). Cf. i, 39, X ob. St
rsi, st spssiss sst aosHB iBtantloais.
n. I Sit. 19, 9, a ad 1.
Pi«i 341.
M, Z Um% , 19, 6, 8 ad 1.
•• to Pq». 8, S 6 (pria.).
7. Ooapw* this with tb« deotrlB* ea th« intaaldoB with Its two
••IMMts M
parfaotla^ th« kaoiirnr HOd r*pt««mtljBg the r«el tfbj«ett
pp. 139 - 128.
•• SSLlSSL* 7, 9 ad 7.
13. Maa aihil propria daflaltur alal ^paolaa, oua onala daf Initio
as eaaara at dlffaaraatia oooatat. !t al all(iuod ••ua dafiaitur, hoo
aat laqftMatiM aat apaalaa (Y l£at . 8, a. 877).
16. I, ^, 8 a.
n. X, ae, a ••
89. em P2t. 7, u 0.
Urn a. U»6«
37. a. lOSa.
43. V ^. 9, a. 898.
44. aodl . 1, 8 a.
48. ja Var . ^, s ad ».
48. «)dl. 1, 8 a.
49. UOdl. 9, 4 0.
80. dai2l» 7, I ad 9.
5t* I sact . 8ft» £, 1 aol. Iba man tmae veya era iii.ir»»w«,
la a dlffarattt ord«F, la da Vyr, 1, 5 ad ld> ^uaadaat iBEranivntttr
Mlalloaaa, ifut» aihll la r«raa aatura poauita aad ia rati«aa taotmi
^(ttod luldaa 4iia4nq)lloit«r AoatlaBlt* • • l|g£ MPdo* qmaado allquid ad
•alpauB rafartuTt ut aua dleiaua UUm «id«B} si aala liaa« ralatio
all<|Hiid ia WMi aadmra pcmarft adAitua ai qu»d dloitur Idan aaaat
la laflaitoi proeadara ia ntoua, quia Ipaa ralatio par «i«flB eliqiaa
rao dlof otMJf aadOB, *aa«t aadan aibi par alloa r«Iiitioa«i, •! alo
la litftnltttw. Saowkte. <|aaBdo Ipaa ralatio ad allquid rafar^ir. Haa
aala potaat dial ^uoA patanltaa r«farat«r ad Mfbjaotuoi awia par allaai
ralatlaiMa aadlM, «aa lUa atlaai aadla ralatio tadisMrol alia aodla
raletioaa, at ale la infiaitoa. tlBdo lUa ralatio quaa alenlf laatur
la mamaiiitlniia pataraltatU ad aab joatun, aim dloitur la rorm aatura,
ood U ratlOBO taatoa. Tortlo> tjaaado uaw rolatlforun poodat ox
altaro, at aoa a ooavarao, sleut aolantle dm^aodat a aoiblll, at aoa
o oaatraraet uada ralatio aolaotiao ed aolblla aat allq^lid la rarua
aatwra, aoa rolatlo •albUla ad oalMftlan, aad ratloia taatua. ';aarto.
(juaado aaa ooaparatw ad son ana; ut cub dloltaua, quod noa mbbuo prloraa
bla i>ul futurl auBt post aoos alias oavMvatar quo4 pooaant aaaa In-
flaltaa ralatloaoa la oodai, si coaoaratlo ia iaflaitai srooodarat la
futurai*
B7. Ibid .
88. I, m, 1 o.
89. ad 4.
do. da rot . 7, 11 0.
6S. I, 28, X 0.
•8. X, X8, 7 a.
«« XII
£«G. II, 48
m»a
«r%(
11, a. 8684. llM vveaoBs foar Mgrlag
I, 76, M, 1, 8, & 6| COKP . Thtol . I, 79.
m w giTta
•• I, 79, 5 e.
»• I, 84, 8 o.
18, I, 86, 1 e.
14. ^.0. U, 91 (nad.— p. 313 D, top); of. £^. 11, 96: Xammltaa
aala a Mt«ria faait all<]ald aoM par m
tat«lll|Jkila( I, 79, 3 oi
«x boo a«l aU(iald intalllgtbUa aota ^mod a»t tanatariala. • . Opor-
tat Icltw poaara idlqfttn Irtutan az parte iatallaotus qvaa fseavat
iatallisibilla ia aotu par dbalraatiOMM •paaiaraa a eoaditionlbua
atariaUboa.
U* <^ tTitt« IodiT» (oBta taad.)} of. £.0. II, 76 (aad.— p. 180 a,
bot. - b, top) I aoa aniffl boo c^iod oot oooo iadiTitma ropoipat oi qvod
oat aooo lixtoUi«ibllo aetu ... Sod id ^uod rafpufaat iatallicibilitati
act aatarialltaa.
^'» i^JSSi* 2SI» •• ' t*** P«»u— "d fin,); of, d» ;af gt swi .
e. 4 (po«t Bad,— od. £3ogr«r» p« S9)i iut«ll«otuui aoln Mt qui egit
ttBlv«r«<aitat«i in r«AnM, Mao do r«fet, acq, o, 1 (prin,) & o, 8
(pria,),
87. VII Mot. IS, a, 1B70{ of. do Bot. Oaa. o. 5t II df^. 18,
a. 8fra| I, 85, 8 ad at 5 ad 1; I-II, 89, 6 at Ija aaivaraeli dupli-
oltor eontiagit lo^t uao aodo aoeuadua quod ouboot intoatioai
uaiYoraelitttiat nlio aado, dieitur da aatam oui tulia iataatio
attribuituT} tJLia aat aaia ooaaidaratio boadaia uaivaracOia, ot
alia ia oo .|uod oot
m* IX d« it, »• 578} of. I, 14, 13 •! SpMlM atxtw l8l«l-
,^
llclbllla liit«UM%iui aMtri ••% •Indlitude Mi (ittsatuK mA M%«t«i
•pMl«t 4tta« M% pasrtteipabUia a parti«alfintoiui iBfialtls,
X, 38, 1 ad 4.
3f VXX J4{t.. i;}, A. XS70} nlm othw plaOM eitad U »!• 87*
40 X, 88, 8 ad 2.
41 I 3agl. 8, 1, 8 aol.
48 IX 3<at. 3, 1, 8 ad 8.
44 I >«rlb . 10, n. 8.
X Ug±» 1, n. 1990.
«• I, as, 4 a,
6. O.O. I, 6B (prU.).
11, 3aa X, 68, S a, alwr* tbla la vacr wall danralapad* Ibr tha
aaka vt brarity, l«ig«biar paaaagaa froa tha aifaaa that aaold Tvy
partlaaadly ba tiaotad will ba ctaraly rtfarrad to, Cf. £«0, IX, 96
(ad«-~p, 286 a, bot«)t Par alallltttdiaaa ante aalwalla. par (jona
aagMaatwa aliijuld io ganara taaftun, iBpaerfaatiOMM aagaitiaiMB
kabMaa ^tum par aladlit«dia«B haalnla. par ^luai aoffaoaainna apaalaa
aoa^lataai aacaaaaara antan ali^ald aa<wiwiww tana taatun, aat aa^-
mwomtm iaparfaata at quaal ia potaokla, ao0M«aara «)*« la apaala
aat aagnoaoara par foot a at la aotu* Hto.
18. X, 66, 6 a.
14, XI Plara . 3, a. S.
IS, I, U, 4 ad 8| af, jO.0, X, 80| VII Marl. S, bb, 1378 > 90.
a ^piollbat aaaa, Ita taauB (|uod a<^ flat areaolalo alloujua aorum*' (^
rto ff^ Hffff., a, 4, »ad,«»>od« ttoyav, p. 27). it would ba OBatradlatezr
to atta^pt to aoMolTo of aa oaaaaao vlttMnit ea order to axUtaeaa,
alaea aaoaaaa la Bothlag otbor than tha aaaMT la «hl<di a thlag natr-
alaaa It a aot of bolact "iBMVitla dloltur aaouadtai <iMd far oam at la
aa ra« babat aaoo" (Ibid, , e, 1, fla,), /« aaaaaoo or q^ddlty la
alvagra tha aaaaaoa or quiddity of aooathlast that la to aogr, of aaaa
balag, la aoaa a aaoo boftoo «i o aa aaaa la sm^ad ea aaaaaoa, t>e
la CMopadi for «*prlaB la latallaotu cadlt ana" (I ?.«at. a, a, i..,; ^»
bofiora anythlag la eoaaalTod aa a partloalar klad of ttilag, balac la
aoaaalTadt for "lllud (uod loplao latellootua ooaalplt quaal aotlaai^iaaB
at la (itto OBBaa ooaoafptloaaa raaolvlt, aat ana" ( ^<i Ty « 1, 1 e, pr&a,).
nr a thlas to ba kaowa It ouat ba la tha kaovari ^'oognltlo sulan fit
par boa, quod aoealtaa aat all^ul aodo la oogaoaoaata'* (II j|a 12, ^,
a, 977); aad "aaaa laitaB latollaotva laqiaaatum latallaetun oportat oaao
la latamgaato** (C^, IV, 11— p. 446 b). That BMaaa that it la a bolag
axoralalag aa aat of^axlatanoa la tba kaawar, t tha aanw tlao tha
kaoww too mult bo aaarolalae thla a«BO net baoeaao la kaowlac, tho
aat of tho tsamm aad of tho thing kaooa eaP9 tho aaMot "Oognoaoaaa la
aetu aat IfaoB oogaltua la aotu" (II do^, 12, a, 377}, A>r thla to
bo poaalbla tho kaooar anat la aaaa way bo froportlOBOd to tha thlag
kBom, Eaaaa, la our hima aa«patlofe of Bartarlal thlaga, tho lagpartmao
of tho h^mm conpoalta, aad of tha part of tha aaaaaa oad laaglaatlOB,
It not bo rwaadiarart that It la aot pvoparly tho latoUoot oloas whlcfa
kaoaa, but tho vtelo aaat "aoa aal« proprlo loquaado wmmtM nut Intal-
laetua ooffMOOlt, aad hoan par utnaa^ua (JftflE. 8. 6 •* »)• «»• *J»4^
kaon awrolaoa Ita aatjof aalataaaa la tha huMa kaeaflr both netorlally
ia hU laaglaatlaa aad lanatorlally la hla lataUaet, {li<»r tha part of
tha pbaataM la aogaltloa aaa I, 04, 7; 88» 1 ft t| M* !)•
raallty
Mhaa thla balM «^«ti aslata la tha IdlaUaot aa wall »• la
«rara of what
la ayprahMaiii la alalia oypratiaaaloa, tha aaa b aaaaaa
awaraaaaa thara la no dlraot ntteatloa to
klad of bolag it la, la that
tho partlaular wdo of boli« vhloh la bolag asaralaods but aolthar la
thara tha Mfrahaaaiaa of tba ^Uddltv m If It bad ao aot of axlataaeo.
Itorof a ^olddlty that is not tb« tulddlty of soeoothiac* :r4ao« form
is tkm vriBSipl* of boineCfonM Mt priaoipium •••«iiti''~*d« llobd, 8,
panlo pMit asd; of. not* 181) and mmhoo is th* OManrnp in whiob th*
thiag «anr«l««s its cot of bsliig, «h«B ths team or ssssaos of a thing
is apprsbsttdsd bgr th* iatsllsot, vsistsooe is in^lloltly in ths apprs-
hsasiOB, snrsB teouc^ only ths nannsr or kind of bsing is aacplieitly
prsssBl to oonsoiousttsss. It is Isft to jvAmanX to eXr* ths saq}lioit
smursnsss of tho aot of being and to sffixn that set. Bsesuss thsrs
srs in things both ssssnos or <2aiddity snd sadstsnos, thsrs ars two
florrsspondiag opsrstloosi Cub ia rs 4hio sint, quidditns rsi «t ssss
sjus, his duohus rsan^ondst teplsx opsratio IntttUsetos (I 3wt« 88, 1,
9 sol.).
For c. fullor trsetesut of this (susstion sss Oilsoa, Ls aislisas
Thsaists. ^« 7, Ts subjsot ooaasissaat," sad «b« 6, n.'sjunrdhsBSiOB
ds I'szlstsaos."
It* tiodl . a, 1 0.
M. £.£• 1, 84 (Md.).
M. I, 80, 4 a« 1.
SI. ds rot. 7, 10 ad 4.
85. I rsrih. 3, a. 4.
94. lU d» ^. 11, a. 747; of. VI Ujjt, 4, a. 1841» 3*4 IIU ooo»»
peaitlo val dirlsle, qua iat«ir««tu« oonjtuaii^t •! Aivldlt mm WMspta,
Mt tuituM in lat«U«ottt, uoa la r«biui« csoaalttlt Malm la mtflw
dttortn atap««a«i«ai» ooaatyloinwii •!• 1U» duo slat idm ••ouadim r*,
^* d» y<r , 8, 7 ad 3,
88. £.£• II, 78 (aalo oad,— p. 179 b, bot.}; of. 0,0, I, 54 (iied.)t
•• <|iiao awl la ••«• ooguaota, UxiaMaa (lUiftaUaotiuraoatar} dlajtiaotlm
aeolpara podMt.
40. I, 88, 5 aA 3.
44. da rot . 7, 1 0.
47« Ibid .: of. d» lidb4 .. iMft. S (a*d«— Pam. p. 84S b, hot.)t Qste
Mia fonn Ml
twmm
pri»«ipi«i —
w>'
4i, bmmmm* Mt luoA iiihhUiw quanlibvk
habit «ii, habou Mq«allt«r «M9 dlestori I, 14, 4 «t ••• a«4tti-
tuv ttammi d> ifaf tsm. o. 8 (mid.'— sd. boyw, p. is)t Tmt fraMM
«iiB« (lucitt Mft aotvs aatttris*, nBt«ri« «ffieitur wa aetu at hoe all-
quid. Uada illud (juod aiq^aradVMiit noo dat aaaa »otu ^^ifllpIi•itar
MEtariaa, aad aaaa aotu tiae, aiout aoaidaolia fboiuat; ut albade
faait aatu albun.
laotua. »
uaiua ad altaiMM, quaa quidaa aat ia aoMpaaitiaaa val diviaiaaa iatal-
aaHaK ia iataUlsibUi iaaaNyUaa.
I, It, t at Coi autaa onaia raa ait vara aaouadui quod babat pro*
pviaa faaiTi aatovaa auaa, naaaaaa aat tpioA intallaatua, iniuaatvai aat
aoffwaaaaa, ait Tavua iaquoatiaa habat aiailitudini rai aogaitaa, quaa
aat ftnraa ajua ia^aaatiai aat aagaaaaaaa. St prvptar boa par ooafand"
tataa intallaettta at rai Taritaa dfafiaitur. ttada awurooaitatai iataa
aasBoaaara, aat oagacMMara varitataa. H«m autMt nullo nodo aaaaua
>aeit; Uaat aaia viaua hidMMt alailitudiaaa viaibilia, aaa tMan
>aoit aoa^aratiooaa cfuf aat iatarsara viaaa at Id ^uod ipaa afpr»>
haadit da ae. Intallaatua autaa aoafonaitataa a«i ad ram iotalligi-
bilaa aa«aaaaara pattaati aad tcawa aaa appraivaadit aaa aaaaadua quad
imantnll da aliq(aa ^^Md (|uid aat| aad qiaaada judiaat *m ita aa
habara alout aat fana quoi da t% apprahandit, tunc^iao oognoaoit
at dicit TaruB. rt boa faait OBajpaaaada afl diTidaado.
71 Mat. 4, n. 1836 1 iBta&laettta aat«B habat i9ai •• alailitudlaai
rai Ictalleatea, aaoundua ^uod ri?timiaa ineo^ylaaorua aoaeipit; aoa
tMMa piaptar boa ipa» aiailitudiaaa dijudioat, aad aelua aw aoapoait
rai dirldit. Cua aaia intallaatua aaaeipit boa quad aat nataal ratio-
ala aortala, epud aa aiailitudinaa boaiaU habat; aad aoa preptar boa
aosaeaait aa hnaa aiaUltudinaa habara, quia mm jadiaat boaiaaa ——
aainal ratioaala at aartolat at idao ia baa sola aaooada oparatioaa
Pttfi* 307.
67. do Trin . 6, a e,
iO. do Var. 8, 7 ad 3.
.
61. I, as, S «A 9.
il. S«g«» XU ii ^* ^^» &• 74^ < ^tado avkMi (jEnt*lI«o%ui) e«Bpoait,
fit a— tat«lllglbU» • • • uo4 si luttilootoa fattiet ooBPoaUloawi • .
• 11 aio oonpottlt. fttRMBS oi»qi>osltlQB«B«— IX at. ll. a. 189et Cun e«1t«i
iBlallMtM HBMBgmWI fOWMtt • • •# Opttr««t qVOA la MMpMltiS aMb-
•taal&ls IpM Mapoaltlo fMm* td «k»«v1m • • • Ml «tl«i «aposltle
fteoid«ati« ad adbjeetua, rMpoBd««t qcoMl fttadaMatuat «% oaum «rit«itl8,
— upoaltlonl, cftmk inftaXleotus l&tirlua ft>BB«i» «t aKBrialt voe*.
68* lb* two t«BM «• Ibv thd aoat pwpt lyaamMnMit «• «Fp«ar« to
• eartaia «aeft««t ia th« t«rts •Irmir swui aad «i^ b« anr« •pparwal
khaaa t«il«h ara «o fallor. Y«t ttM«r da li«ra a aaaMhat difTwaal
ftatioa* PapgWKiltiao ia oft« uaad ia a aooltKl daeliag with ra»-
aattaaiatioa uaad aa a piraalaa la a ajrllotlvu
(K.8.t I-II* 90, 1 ad 8t aat iavaaira ia ratioaa praotlaa ^aad Ita aa
habat ad oparatleaaa, aloot w habat wopaaitlo ia ratiaaa apaeiaativa
ad ooaelualaaaa; I 3 oat. Aaal. 36, a. lit ^^Uoglaai prlnolpla aunt
pvofoaitloaaa} XI aara. 8, a* 8t pvoyoaitioaaa igrllosiMi vm% oausa
aeaalttaiamai} a* 9t «x t«BdLala pvopoaitiaaaa aaaatitultur aoaaluaiot
uada aaoaadwa taoo pvopoaitlonaa dleaattur netarla eoaolualonia; a. 10:
priaoipiua diaattraua ratioaia ia aoAOluaiaa* aat ax propoaltloaibuas
I Pjwt* Aaal» 4, a. 10 1 naaaaaa aat qfnod dannatratiYa aaiantla. • •
pxooadat m propoaltloalbua varla, priada at laMdlatla,} IMa ia aot,
howavar, tha aaoliwiTa uaa of tha tam "rarepoaitiaa", b«t oftaa it naaaa
aa anuaelatloa ia emamml, {am taxta qitwtad: X, 86, 8 at latallaetua
BMtar alml iatalli€:it aabjaatwi •! preadieotiaa, preut auat partaa
aaitta propoaitioaia; uodl. 7. z ei da Var. 6, 14 a; elao I 3ant » 33,
1, 1 ad li aaaa qiiiad aigaifleat Tarltataa aoapMltloala ia paropoai-
tloaibua • • • Aaadatur ia aaaa rai.)
awaeiutiop. Ilka '*word'*, can ba altbar tha lnta(rael or tha axtar-
aal aaja-aaaioa ia «li«t ia oo&aalTad, aad aaaua, Ilka 'Nwrd", to bo do-
aaniaatad fMs tha axt^aal axivaaaiOB* Ita otynaXoor firau a»awiti«ro.
*to aaaouaeo ftoth", "to apaak out", auggaata thia. Uer^omt, it la
plaood ia tho ganaa oratjo. tha otanaologir of whiflb la givaa aa 2dl
aad ratio, aaeaiag tha aaQMroaaioa of aoa» eet of roaaoa throttiSi tho
MVthfit awt. 10, 4, 1, aol. 1), ttBd ea auoh la a apaoiaa of axtar-
aal oord { vo« aitfaifio^tiva) (I Parih . 1, a. 3, t 0, a. 2). Ita aatwial
parta. furthaaaora, ara oouaa aad varba, both eloo toooa siaSASlSSSi^SSS,
(Ibid. . 4, a. 1). That •oouaoiatioa" U aot aotolualTaly aa o«t»Bal
Wjaoaalaa of thmi^t, bat alao tho istaraal ooapoiinrt tant fli>fowa fM«
tho faat that it la anid to bo ooaatitutod bgr Hkm oparatioa of tho iatol-
loot aad ttMl it la oallad eta Intamal word (a.g», .\iodl . 5, 9 at Sat
aataM dvvlaa oparatio IntaUaotua. . • ima qjaidai qaao tooatur ladiTi-
aiblUiBi iBtoUigantia, par (ioctt lataUootaa fannit ia aoipao dofial-
tiooM, tOI aoaooptiM alioujua iaecnploal* Alia aat«R oparatio aat
latoUootua ooavoMatia at dlTidaatia, aaoiadw qimb tomtit amaatla-
M vtna^ao iatocMa par oporatioaaa iaiaUoetua ooaatitutorua
I).
mi
Hf objMiliT* m—ning of wauBelaitioni it is the \mm lJit<i^li^tiiX»
fttMMl ^
JiiilpMnt. (;>«• te Vjr. a, 7 et (liit«U«otu^ in mipao int«l-
lltiblXia flB8Mitt J^» ^'A* !<* OS fomav* «wistial>lUe • • • wauBtletioaflB
faanMAdD; uojLl , 4, 17 e: id«i «MUiti«bll« tuaiidoqa* Mt Tvna, (jueiUlo-
qiM fal«mTlSiii «t ob« 8t p«r%«« «aatttlabilia Muit yEmadlootwi vt mb-
jMtwi •% oo«pMlt&0{ 1, 16, 7 «t tiiwilUbll* «iiiB Mt la iatail«etu vt
la voo«}»
67. Ibid ., a.
69. t&a tasn ia l»pU«d, ibid , aa. 760-61, by ooatrt&at with lat«>l-'
llgibila ia<wplaBPan.
74. X Parlfc* 9, a. 6.
76. I, 5. 4 ad 2.
76. X, OB, 4 a,
77. I Par lb . 3, a. 4.
mmw^i^ mm p«i» mo.
00. tX Ijaft. 11, a. 1896t «'• i£ SSL* ^* ^^ '"^ *< ^^ <"^ aliqua
daa ita mm iM^aaat qaod uaHB ait ratio iatalllgaadl aliud, amoa aonn
aorit ^aaai faiaalot at aliad ^juaai aat«lt<lat at ala iUa duo amt
«» iatallicibila, eua as ibnaa at Bataria aaon eoaatituatur. ttoda
iatallaotua, ^uendo intalliglt Rlicjaid p«r nltanw, intalli^t unaa
Intallii^ibila.
U. I rarih. 0, a. 11.
tt. X, id, 8 ••
88. I Faarih . 8, a. 8.
*'• ^ i^SSl* i£i!^* 10> ftft* 3 & 4{ £.9. II, 91 (ad |Via.— p. 2^3 a,
top) ; VII M«t. 3, na. 13U » 1318.
94. V L9t, 9* BB. 888 « 887| of. ibid .. U, a. 908} I Pot . /J>«1.
83, B. 4.
^•iSlSl* 8, 8 ad S.
101. lY ^ot. 7, a.
1(». VII i/'ot. 8, a. 1888} Of. Ibid. 3, a. ISeSt Q«nw «Kt«B aoa jvoo-
WttOBMI, aod par aaaiat ifu Hoao «iia
dioatvr do opooiobaa por p«rtiolp«tioa«a,
oat aaiaal oaaaatialitor, bob aelun eliquid ealBialia pcortieipnaa. . .
Spooloa oalM aoa oo h«^oal ad goaHO aievt propria goaorio paaaio} aad
lovt id qood oal p« oaaaati wi IdaB goaari>.
103. do rot. 8, 4 ad 2.
104. I ^|9t. 3, 4, 8 ad 1.
110. Z, 13. IS ••
116. I, 85, 6 ad 3.
1^. 119M , S (i^rnXo poat zaad.— ad. Parei. p. 348 b, bot.)t of* 1*
<!•
75, ft ai Bmm 4ut«M aa oonvanlt fonwa, qiuia Mt rotua. UMa amtaria
•aauadMi hea eaqalrit aaaa in aotu, qood naqulrit fMnsMoi} £•£• IZ, 54t
VDoma autaa patasi dial (jtap a||»t, aaaundum quod eat aaaandriprlitelpluni
da Prltt. Kfit , (eid ^1&«): fomA f(^oit aaaa in eatut "^t ^* 1 «>^ It
PrUua ant«B affaotua taamm aat aaaa, aan aanla raa hebat aaaa aaaun-
182. da£J., 7, S ad 9.
Iflt, I rarih . S, n. SB.
18». Ibid , ad 5.
IM. ZI rarlb . e, n. 2.
las. XI imrUk , S, a. a.
13S, <lo >x»t» 6, 1 cid XX. .ijaa flh. IIZ, Xaat aaatloa.
ISO. imm eh. Z?, p. SG c«id acta 1; tila» VI Mat. 4, a. xetSt ana
qpad dieitur tp»m»i anai at bob ana quod dieitur cjuaai f^XauB} a. XSSSt
aaa at aoa mm^ aoiXiaat TaeraB at talaiaii; a. X848i aaa quod algalfient
nmmn^^ mam pantm.
136. m jgfi
/«• U. nil, 747 It 760>61g £.0. I, M.
IS?, IX j^. U, a. 19U. 3M the vboU paraorait,
143. Ill <1« JO.. U, a. TBlt of. X-n, 90, 1 ed '^} II-II, 47, S «k4 3.
146. V Ugi, 11, a. 918t Ideatltea est uaitea vel uaio; nut eat eo
({tiodLlla qoaa dleaatur Idea, aunt plure eeeimdun eeae, et tenHi di-
ittatur id«H laquaatura la cdiauo uao eaaventtaxt. Aat tiale auafc uaum
aeeuadun eaaa, aed lateUeetua utitur ea at pluribua ed boe ^piod rele-
tlen« iBtaUiOBt, Haa im
potest InteUigl relet lo aial iatw dtae e»-
tr«Be. sioiit am dioitur ollquld esse ld«i albi ipsl. Tuae eola iatel-
Isetos ualttir es owed est vmm eeeaaftw r«i« ul teatous. ^lias ejaad«i
ed ssipsun relatiOMB dssi gisrs aoa posset* Uads patet, quod si rele>
tie ssBQMr requlrit duo eat y
aa, et la hujuanodl relntleiaibus aoa aiat
duo eatri ssmaadtai raa aed aeeondam latelleetuM aelum, reletlo ideo-
titatle aoa erlt rslatio realia, aed ratleale te«taa, sseuaAaa ({tied
eli^ld dieltxur Idas eirapUeiter.
4. X, 7t, 9 0.
6. II r^oat . 2, 1, 3 ool.
e. I, 79, e o.
14. I, 66, 8 0.
16. I. oe, 3 «d 1.
19. I, 89, 4 0.
ao. I, 68, 4 0.
A4. X, Vf , 9 0.
89. I Pot , AMd, 3, &• 3; of. ibid ., a. It I& Ipsia qttid«i priaoi-
plis vraMttc&itls prMMOCBoaeltor oonelu»io, aoa Autcn aetut sio «alm
la 9i,M prtt««ciotlt| I» 88, 4 e: x «o4«b pvovMlt quod lnt«ll»etua
apat«r latslllfjlt diamnrraate, «ft ocaqNmaate at dlTltftiido, aat hea aal-
lioat v^uod Qoa atntioi la ppiaa apfvabaaaleaa elleajua prtml apfrahMai,
polaat laapleara qald<iuld la ao nrluta oontiaalari Z, 1, 7 at aua
fata aalanllR vlrtuta ooatlaaetur ia priaalplla. • •
M. te ¥£• a, u 0.
40. I, U, 7 e.
43. I, 68, a 0,
^* I i:ssi* ^JmJ" 3, a. 1,
47, I, S8, 4 e.
48. asa on* I, pp, 7 - 10, aad «h. V, p. 180, aapaaially I-IX, 90,
I «d 2t ia opaaribua ratioaia ast ooasidarara ipsua QOtaa ratioais,
<ial ast latallicwa at rntioelBeri, at nliguld par hujaaaodl aatoa
oofMtittttiau aod qittidaa ia apaaulntiTA ratioaa, prioo siuidaa ast
dafialtiot saottBdo. awMrtletio; tartio Tan, syllOfayus val awwwaa-
tatio i IZ-ZZ, 47, a ad St ratio q^aoulativa ouaadaa faoit pvta
aylXaat—i, propssitioaaM at alia knjaa»dl,
fS. II ity ,
S, n. 8| ef • V M«t. 5, n, TTSt SuprioaltionM, idM%
propesltio&M pra«gds«a«, ex tiuilnw joropeaitia crlloglsatur, diountur
MS* o«Ma anBeluaioftls • • • saoaataB quod dleitur oauaa iUud «k quo
fit allqiitld, qvod aa* r«tio e> uana nntarlalla.
B8, • 9.
M«
Of • V u&t , 3, n. 778t PrapoaitlOBoa diouatiur aaaa Bwtari« oob-
elttalattla«aoa <ialdam aae«BdtBi quod aub tHll fanMi asiatuBt • • •• ••<
quastaa ai tandaoa, «a: r^allnaa penastur* Ueat as tartalBla praoniaaariaa
aoHpMBltur eonoluaio, aollleat «x oajorl at atJUiorl axtrasitata.
IB).
not aaly fBllcws %hm praalaM bul follows trcfk tham And baoBuaa of thtn,
fhls offioMor of tlio pr«Bii««i nuit b« iuaowa: "oportot m1wi%«bi siBvll-
elt«r OflgBOOOTO i^plieatlOMRa oansao nd •ffootun'* (t¥>,4 «. a. S). ^^hat
distlacttlAos thm rolatiOB of oeaaoquoiie* fkwi oao of oMre ouoooaaloa
la tba eauaaiity nBd noeoaaity of tha oonaaetlon; "aoc Ipala aala prifr>
oipiu p«r aa BOtia oaaaiAarat q»od aa qoaa «i aia naoaaaarlo oona**
(jonntiar aimt a«fli%itdtaallt«* tanaada.* (Ja Vigr. 11, 1 o).
^*
^^ ISSl* iSSik* ^^* ^« ^* ^^^ ^"^^ ^ ^
^""^ ^t B aulaai Iti udo»
^gaoqpa aovuii (saaa aual D, aad la plus q{iMai D. Sla Igitur B ualvar-
aaXitar «rtt la hia uuna oostiaaotar aub D, oaoaadaa qfood \iBlTaraellt«r
dioltur laaaaa <iUod non oonTartitur. • • *le Igltor c^uod / alt la Ipala
q^a oontlaastiur nb
i), eauae oat B. —
jMOdl . 0. 1 et i oo quad aooipatlt
aatiffoa eaawaiii abaalutaa ooaaldavatiaaaM att ratio quara oaaqpatat
aaturaa alloul aaauaAaa aaaa ^juod habari la aiacalcorl, at aoa a oonvarso.
Idao aalM tiocmtaa aat ratioaalla (lult^ booD aat ratlmuilla, at noa a
ooBvarao.
1« Ch, I, pp. 8 - u,
5. ^« XI, pp. 17 • 88«
4. pp. 37 - 9i.
B. pp. «) • 46.
T. fir th« us* of th« word "ratioaot*'" m« cOi. Ill, no%« 15.
87. I, IS, 7 e.
m, I, tt, I ad 4.
29. do Pot . 7, 11 0,
SO. X, 60, 8 ••
38. 1h« or4Mr of «li. VII will bo Iblloood for tbo root of tMo
•oetion.
34. at, XIX, 1^. fle ' 70. Th«ro would bo oth«r sRonaiiiso of '*fl0do
of prodloatlOB'* «Aii<tti lo^o would hero to tfOco into oooovat, wob eo
tho i«odie«MBt«« i«it«b cffo diotiaguirtiod aooordlag to tbo nnaaor in
vAiioh ono tblas 1* ivodlofttod of naother, or aodol propeoitiono, in
wlkiob tbo pvooottoo of tbo jvodionto io not affiaaod uim^ls , but tbo
OMmoetioB bolw oon oubjoot wd prodio^to io oacprooaod la o gjMliflod
way, ouflik 00 "portu^o" or "nooooo n rily". IMt j^SLM ^>A cor eooidoi^o
ero tbo Moot fUHdwMontaX aoioo, end tbooo HOOt iBQortc nt to loisio.
96. Soo cb. IX. Aogr dopeirturoo f^ram ito ordor will bo indiOHtod.
40. I ^orib . 8, a. 9.
47. 8M «to. Til, IIP. 209 - aL6t also a» >^%. 1, 1 r>4 10: Iat»l-
leotu0 Intalllglt aeturm naiiaelle In lMxala«, la •quo, at tailtls allls
gp oaiotmi OS teo sotjaltuv quod Inlolllclt ocoi ut «anio.
.
u
mtloM of th» KMrtui of at, Hwm U(i»d
!• Ja >4rlstottll« Llbrup to 'fttoa OwB—atcorlMm. odltoA tagr /Agolo
K, Jlrotta, O.P. Turlai i^arlvtti, 1036.
U* 8I0SX1B
88. 3iaoiiiB( B. D.« OJ*., "La notloA d' Igtaotio d(j»a l*oauvra
da St. ISioaaa d'A^uiA,*' Ravua da» B^lapeea pblloaoTA^laii
Si tliHiMimm ^ XXX (X9lcTr«4S - 468.
•8. 9db«rt, J., o.t'., '^aflaode" la Maiongaa :eadoima>t
l I (Blb-
iletkigiM lltaBlata, XIZI). Parlai Vrla, 1930.
38, —
It tba
St. tovlai
, ttcaAatio Bibllaggafthy.
i;iodara '?efaaol»Mi, 1948.
l9iH) - 1940.
4«. Ovataaaa. Martia, Pi* ^gjia daj hi. ThomtM toa Aggia
(I)aiti««sa BUT Oaaohlohta dar Phllaaophta uad
Thaologla
daa ^Ittalaltara) . y&Mtmt aohaadorffaotao, 1931,
44. Loaaodgfia. BmrnmA, s.J., "tlui Oeaaapt of Vmflmm ia tha
^y^»
••• anlth, Qcnord, r..J,, '*B«fiBr» You iitert IMklag about Ood,*»
SIMmi soiioolMa, IXin (1948), 89-43. (DiaouMion
of vaaaoBlag)
86, ~»—" —— — -
, "Kota OB Pradl0«)tion,'* Um :?qtola«tl-
eH» > XV (1941), SaS - B37,
University of Toron!(
Library
DO NOT
REMOVE
THE
CARD
FROM
THIS
POCKET