2. REPORT INVENTORY VS C.A.

TEAM INVENTIORY VS C.A.

It can be seen that this team used all the production capacity of the EE
plant. UU In round 1; we also observed that, with respect to the
inventory of the other equipment, it was the team that ended with an
inventory of 1028 units at the end of the round 1 and an optimal process.
In your pricing game and marketing strategy. In round 2, the type of
GREEN
strategy is maintained using 100% of the production capacity and in
addition using outsourcing of 165 units for tech 1, giving a final flow of
2,121 units in stock at the end of round 2, this is presented by an
inadequate pricing strategy and additionally lack analysis of each
particular market in order not to end up with so much inventory.
This team also maximizes its production capacity at the EE plant. UU In
round 1, however, the expected effect on the inventory is not correct,
since many units can not be sold at the end of the round closing with a
total of 2,017 units, which is a clear indicator of unbalanced prices. In
RED the second round, the final inventory clearly decreases by one thousand
units, however if we observe the production, the total capacity of the
plant is not used, subtracting a 26.50% of the plant's unused capacity,
therefore the estimate was erroneous and the production was not
optimized.
This team used an 81% production percentage of its plant in the United
States, however, we found that at the end of the round the inventory was
too high of 4,166 units, this is a clear indicator that it was a bad market
BLUE strategy in terms of price. Sale and promotion of your product. In round
2, only 39% of the capacity of the plant is used and the final inventory
is 2,031 units, clearly there is no defined strategy or a clear analysis of
the market.
This team manages a strategy similar to that of the blue team in the first
round, using a large margin of its production capacity 86.25%, however
the stock is high at the end of the round with 4.067 units. In round 2 the
ORANGE
problem is complicated because less production margin is used however
the final inventory between technology 1 and 2 is high and clearly an
indicator of loss or unproductivity of the product at the end of round 2.
This team in the first round used 81% of its production capacity with a
final inventory of 0 units, however this is not so positive because we do
not know what amount of unmet demand could arise, however the
experience improves over its strategy of the market in round 2 they use
GREY
the total production capacity of the plant, yielding a final balance of
1,130 units of technology 2, being a high margin for a final inventory,
they must calculate the production better in order not to end up with
stockpile.