Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

SCORING FORM OF INDIVIDUAL SHORT PAPER

No. Description Criteria % Score


(0-100)
1. Introduction The ability to describe principal methods food analysis for a food sample including a brief 20
explanation about:
a. Definition and scope of method of food analysis
b. Points of an advantages and disadvantages methods of food analysis
c. The accuracy and realibility of a methods of food analysis
d. The objective of paper assignment
2. Materials and Methods a. Materials, reagents and apparatus used 20
b. Methods of food analysis
3. Conditions of procedure food analysis and a. The ability to describe sample preparations 40
how to get data b. The ability to describe steps of food analysis
c. The ability to describe the determination of food components by a method of food
analysis.
d. The ability to do a calculation in finding final data
e. The ability to identify qualitatively and/or quantitatively a food components acccording
to a method of food analysis used.
f. The ability to present data, interpretate and discuss data
4. Conclusions The ability to make a clear link between aims of the paper and conclusion and a well 10
formulated conclusion

5 Writing skill The ability of the student writing 10


+References list
Rubric for paper assignment

Marks <55 55-69 70-79 >80


Introduction and the aims (20 %)
1. Relevance topic, The introduction is described in broad The introduction is clearly written. The Introduction is defined well, The introduction is written sharply
clearness aims terms but there is no clear explanation The link between topic and aims are There is a link between the topic and and to the points. And the link
of the principal method of the analysis not clearly. the principles of analysis. between topic, principles analysis
The introduction is not formulated Few literatures are presented The explanations are mostly clear but and the aims are explained sharply.
clearly. Very few literatures are could have been defined sharper at The literatures used are sufficient
presented some points. and relevant.

Material and Methods (20%)


2.Material and Material and method are not written Material and method are written Material and method are written Material and method are written
Methods completely and correctly completely but completely but completely and correctly
shows some errors shows occasional errors

Procedure Analysis (40%)


3. Procedure Analysis There were insufficient information on Some aspects of the procedure Some aspects of the procedure Description of the data (collection,
and Discussion data and analysis methods. analysis the analysis methods are analysis the analysis methods are treatment) as well as the analysis
No confrontation with existing described insufficiently. described sufficiently. methods is complete and clear.
literature. Confrontation with irrelevant existing Student shows minor and major
literature. correlation and correspondences with
literature
Conclusions (10%)
4.conclusions No link between introduction, Conclusions are drawn, but in many Conclusions are linked to aims of the Clear link between aims of the paper
discussion and conclusions. cases these are only partial answers paper but not all questions are and conclusions. All conclusions
to discussion and aim of the paper addressed. Some conclusions are not substantiated by results. Conclusions
substantiated by discussion result are well formulated.

Writing skills (10%) Paper is badly structured. In many Main structure incorrect in some Main structure is correct, but lower Most sections have a clear and
cases information appears in wrong places, and placement of material in level hierarchy of sections is not unique function. Hierarchy of sections
Marks <55 55-69 70-79 >80
locations. Level of detail is different chapters illogical in many logical in places. Some sections have is mostly correct. Ordering of
inappropriate throughout. places. Level of detail varies widely overlapping functions leading to sections is mostly logical. All
ambiguity in placement of information. information occurs at the correct
Level of detail varies widely places

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen