Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
• Reflec1s the very latest Egyptian Code provisions (ECP 203- 2007)
and includes all major changes and additions.
• Numerous illustrations and figures for each topic.
• Good theoretical background for each topic with code provisions.
• Extensive examples in each chapter utilizing SI units.
• All examples are worked out step-by-step ranging from
simple to advanced.
• Full reinforcement details for every example.
• Numerous design charts.
First Edition
2008
ii
4. CONTROL OF CRACKING
2. DEEP BEAMS AND CORBELS 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 290
4.2 Reasons for Controlling Crack Widths ..................................................... 291
2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 205
4.3 Types of Cracks ........................................................................................ 291
2.2 Deep beams ............................................................................................ 206
4.4 Development of Cracks due to Loads ....................................................... 293
2.2.1 General ..................................................................................... 2{)6
4.5 Crack Control in the Egyptian Code ......................................................... 294
2.2.2.1 The Empirical Design Method .................................... 210
4.5.1 Categories of structures .........................., ................................ 294
2.2.2.2 Design Using the Strut and Tie Method ...................... 217
4.5.2 Satisfaction of Cracking Limit State........................................ 295
2.2.3 Detailing of Other Types of Deep Beams ................................ 218
4.5.3 Code Related Provisions ......................................................... 299
2.2.3.1 Bottom Loaded Deep Beam ........................................ 218
4.6 Liquid Containing Structures .................... ,............................................... 301
2.2.3.2 Continuous Deep Beams ............................................. 219
4.7 Design Aids for Calculating Wk •••......•.•••••••.••••••••••••••.•..•.•.•••••..•••••••••..••..• 302
2.2.3.3 Deep Beam Supporting Another Deep Beam.............. 222
Example 4.1 .................................: .................................................... 306
2.3 Shear- Friction Concept ............ '" ............................................................. 223
Example 4.2 ...................... , .......... ;.................................................... 309
2.4 Short Cantilevers (Brackets or Corbels) ................................................... 228
Example 4.3 ...................................................................................... 315
Example 2.1 ...................................................................................... 232
Example 4.4 ...................................................................................... 317
Example 2.2 ...................................................................................... 238
5. DESIGN OF FOUNDATIONS
3. CONTROL OF DEFLECTIONS
3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 242 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 324
3.2 Load-Deflection Behavior of RC Beams .................................................. 243 5.2 Types of Foundations ........ ,........................................................................ 325
3.3 Moment of Inertia of RC sections ............................................................. 244 5.3 Soil Pressure under concentrically Loaded Footings ................................ 328
3.3.1 Gross moment of inertia .......................................................... 244 5.4 Soil Pressure under Eccentrically Loaded Footings ................................. 330
3.3.2 Cracked Transformed Moment of Inertia ................................ 246 Example 5.1 ...................................................................................... 333
3.3.3 Effective moment of inertia Ie ................................................. 250 5.5 Gross and Net Soil Pressures .................................................................... 336
3.4 Code Provisions for Control of Deflections .............................................. 252 Example 5.2 ...................................................................................... 338
3.4.1 Limiting Deflection by Span-Depth Ratio (Approach One) .... 252 5.6 Design of Isolated Footings ...................................................................... 339
3.4.1.1 Beams and One-Way slabs .......................................... 252 5.6.1 Introduction .............................................................................. 339
3.4.1.2 Two-way slabs ............................................................. 253 5.6.2 Design Steps ............................................................................ 340
3.4.2 Calculation of Deflection (Approach Two) ............................. 254 Example 5.3 ...................................................................................... 347
3.4.2.1 Calculation of Immediate Deflection .......................... 254 5.7 Combined Footings ................................................................................... 353
3.4.2.2 Long Term Deflection ................................................. 2,55 Example 5.4: Combined footing with PC ......................................... 356
3.4.2.3 Permissible Deflections ............................................... 257 Example 5.5: RC combined footing resting directly on soil... .......... 368
3.4.2.4 Deflection of Continuous Beams ................................ 261 5.8 Strap Footings ...... ;, ................................................................................... 377
Example 3.1 ...................................................................................... 263 Example 5.6 ..................................................................... :................ 378
Example 3.2 ...................................................................................... 266 5.9 Raft Foundations ....................................................................................... 389
Example 3.3 ...................................................................................... 270 5.9.1 Introduction .............................................................................. 389
Example· 3.4 ..............................:....................................................... 275 5.9.2 Conventional Rigid Method..................................................... 390
Example 3.5 ...................................................................................... 278 5.9.3 Analysis of the Raft Using Computer Programs ..................... 397
Example 3.6 ...................................................................................... 284 5.9.3.1 Modeling of the Raft ................................................... 397
5.9.3.2 Modeling of the soil .................................................... 397
5.9.3.3 Analysis of the Computer Output... ............................. 401
Example 5.8: Raft using the Conventional method ......................... .403
iii
iv
7.4.3 Prestressing Reinforcement ..................................................... 528
Example 5.9: Raft design using computer analysis .......................... 420
7.5 Losses in Prestressed Members ................................................................. 530
5.10 Design of Pile Caps .................................................................................. 437
7.5.1 Introduction .............................................................................. 530
5.10.1 Introduction ............................................................................ 437
7.5.2 Anchorage Slip Losses (A) ...................................................... 532
5.10.2 Pile Cap shapes ...................................................................... 439
7.5.3 Elastic Shortening Losses(e) .................................................... 533
5.10.3 Design of Pile Caps ................................................................ 440
7.5.4 Wobble Friction Losses (W) .................................................... 534
5.10.3.1 Design Using the conventional Method .................... 440
7.5.5 Curvature Friction Losses (F) .................................................. 535'
5.10.3.2 Finite Element Analysis of Pile Caps ........................ 444
7.5.6 Shrinkage Losses (sh) ...........................~ .................................. 538
5.10.3.3 Design using The Strut and Tie Method ................... 445
7.5.7 Creep Loss (CR) ...................................................................... 540
Example 5.10 .................................................................................... 446
7.5.8 Steel Relaxation Losses (R) ..................................................... 542
Example 5.11 .................................... ,............................................... 454
Example 7.1: Calculations of losses for a pre-tensioned beam ....................... 544·
Example 5.12 ..................................................................................... 462
Example 7.2: Step by step computation of losses in post-tensioned beam ..... 548
7.6 Anchorage Zones ............................... :...................................................... 553
6. STRUT-AND-TIE MODEL 7 .6.1 Introduction ............ ~ ................................................................. 553
7.6.2 Stress Distribution .................................................................... 554
6.1 Introductior ............................................................................................ 471
7.6.3 Met!":nd:; of Analysis ................................................................ 557
6.2 Principle of Band D Regions .................................................................. .473
7.6.3.1 Strut-and-Tie Method ..............................................•... 557
6.3 Components of the Strut-and-Tie Model ................................................. .476
7.6.3.2 Beam Analogy ............................................................. 558
6.4 Design of the Struts ................................................................................... 479
7.6.3.3 Finite element method ............... , ................................. 559
6.4.1 Idealization of the Strut.. .......................................................... 479
Example 7.3 ...................................................................................... 560
6.4.2 Strength of Un-reinforced Struts ............................................. .482
Example 7.3 ..................................................................................... 560
6.4.3 Strength of Reinforced Struts ................................................. .485
Examp'le 7 . .\. ...................................................................................... 564
6.5 Design of Ties ........................................................................................... 486
6.5.1 Strength of the Tie .................................................................. .486
6.5.2 Anchorage of Reinforcement.. ................................................. 486
8. FLEXURE IN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAMS ..
6.6 Design of Nodal Zones ............................................................................. 487
6.6.1 Types of Nodal Zones .............................................................. 487 8.1 Introduction ............. ,............................ ,..............~ .................................. 572
6.6.2 Strength of Nodal Zones .......................................................... 488 8.2 Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Members Under Service Loads ........... 573
6.7 Applications .............................................................. ,............................. 490 8.2.1 General ..................................................................................... 573
Example 1 ................................·......................................................... 495 8.2.2 Allowable Concrete and Steel Stresses .................................... 575
Example 2 ................................................................ '" ...................... 503 8.2.2.1 Allowable Steel Stresses ............................................. 575
Example 3 ......................................................................................... 511 8.2.2.2 Allowable Concrete Stresses ....................................... 576
8.2.3 Calculations of Stresses at Transfer ......................................... 579
8.2.4 Calculations of Stresses ~~t Full Service Loads ........................ 580 .
7. INTRODUCTION TO PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 8.2.5 Summary .................................................................................. 582
Exampl~ 8.1 ...................................................................................... 583
7.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 520 Exanlple 8.2 ...................................................................................... 589
7.2 Systems of Prestressing ............................................................................. 521 Example 8.3 ....................................................................................... 595
7.2.1 Pretensioned Concrete ............................................................. 523 Example 8.4 ........................... :......................................................... 600
7.2.2 Post-tensioned Concrete ................................................... :...... 524 Example 8.5 ...................................................................................... 606
7.3 General Design Principle .......................................................................... 525 8.3 Flexural Strength of Prestressed Beams .................................................... 609
7.4 Materials .................................................................•.......................... 526 8.3.1 Introduction .......................... :.......................... :........................ 609
7.4.1 Concrete .................................................................................... 526 8.3.2 Calculations of the Ultimate Moment Capacity ..................... 612
7.4.2 Non-prestressing Reinforcement ............................................. 527
v vi
8.3.3 Calculation of Prestressing Steel Stress at Ultimate fps .......... 614 9.3 Torsion in Prestressed Concrete ................................................................ 727
8.3.3.1 Calculation offps in bonded tendons .. ;....................... 614 9.3.1 General ..................................................................................... 727
8.3.3.2 Calculation of fps for unbonded tendons .................... 619 9.3.2 The Design for Torsion in the Egyptian Code ......................... 728
8.3.4 Maximum Limits for the Areas of Prestressing and non- 9.3.2.1 Introduction ................................................................. 728
prestressing Reinforcing Steel ................................................. 621 9.32.2 Calculation of the Shear Stress due to Torsion ........... 729
Example 8.6: Mu using the approximate equation (I-section) .......... 624 9.3.2.3 Consideration of Torsion ........................... ,................. 730
Example 8.7: Mu using the approximate equation (T-section) ........ 627 9.3.2.4 Check the Adequacy of the Concrete Section ............. 731
Example 8.8: Mu using the approximate equation (R-section) ........ 632 9.3.2.5 Design of Torsional Reinforcement ............................ 731
Example 8.9: Mu using the strain compatibility method .................. 636 9.3.2.6 Code Requirements ..................................................... 732
8.4 Combined Flexure and Axial Loads ......................................................... 641 9.4 Combined Shear and Torsion .................................................................... 736
8.4.1 Stresses at service loads ........................................................... 641 9.4.1 Introduction .............................................................................. 736
8.4.2 Capacity at ultimate loads ........................................................ 641 9.4.2 Design for Shear and Torsion in ECP 203 ............................... 736
Example 8.10: Strain compatibility method for combined flexure and 9.4.2.1 Consideration of Torsion ............................................. 736
axial load ................................................................... 643 9.4.2.2 Adequacy of the Concrete Cross-Section .................... 737
8.5 Proper Beam Shape Selection ................................................................... 649 9.4.2.3 Design of Transverse Reinforcement.. ........................ 738
8.6 Limiting Eccentricity Envelopes ............................................................... 650 9.4.2.4 Design of Longitudinal Reinforcement....................... 739
Example 8.11: Upper and lower envelopes ...................................... 653 Example 9.3: Combined shear and torsion design(1) ....................... 743
8.7 Determination of the Prestressing Force and the Eccentricity in Flexural Example 9.4: Combined shear and torsion design(2) ....................... 750
Members ............................................................................................ 658
Example 812'. . D e termma . t'IOn 0 fP an d e comb'mat lOns·· .................. . 662 10 .CONTINUOUS PRESTRESSED BEAMS
Example 8.13: Determination of P and e combinations ................... 668
8.8 Reduction of Prestressing Force Near Supports ....................................... 677 10.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 758
8.9 Deflection of Prestressed Beams ............................................................... 678 10.2 Tendon Profile for Continuous Beams .................................................... 759
8.9.1 Introduction .............................................................................. 678 10.3 Elastic Analysis of Continuous Beams ................................................... 762
8.9.2 Calculations of Deflections in the ECP 203 ............................ 679 10.3.1 Effects of the Prestress ........................................................... 762
Example 8.14 ..................................................... :.............................. 683 10.3.2 Support Displacement Method .............................................. 762
Example 8.15 .................................................................................... 686 10.3.2.1 Background ............................................................... 762
Example 8.16 .................................................................................... 691 Example 10.1 ....................................................................... :............ 768
Example 10.2 .................................................................................... 773
9. SHEAR AND TORSION IN PRESTRESSED 10.3.3 Equivalent Load Method ....................................................... 778
Example 10.3 .................................................................................... 783
CONCRETE BEAMS 10.4 Linear Transformation and Concordant Profiles ................................. ,.. 789
9.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 700
9.2 Shear in prestressed Beams ....................................................................... 701 Appendix A: Design Charts for Sections Subjected to Flexure ..................... 791
9.2.1 Inclined Cracking ..................................................................... 701 Appendix B: Design Charts for Calculating ler and Wk ................................. 799
9.2.2 Effect of Prestress .................................................................... 702 Appendix C: Slope and Deflection Equations ............................................... 807
9.2.3 Shear Strength According to ECP 203 .................................... 703
REFERENCES ........................................................................................... 813
9.2.3.1 Upper limit of Design Shear Stress qumax ................. 703
9.2.3.2 Shear Strength Provided by Concrete qcu ................... 705
9.2.4 Shear Reinforcement Calculations ........................................... 712
Example 9.1: Shear design using the simplified procedure .............. 715
Example 9.2: Shear design using the detailed procedure ................. 720
vii viii
1
ARCHES, SPECIAL TYPES OF FRAMES AND
TRII,$SES >~
1.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the use and design of reinforced concrete arches and
trusses as supporting elements of systems that cover halls having relatively
large spans. It 'covers also the design and the construction of the saw tooth roofs
in which the light from the windows is directly reflected by the roof inside the
hall giving a uniform distribution of natural light.
1
Choosing the most economical structural system depends on many factors such
as the type .of soil, the architectural features of the building, and most
importantly the span that needs to be covered. Table 1.1 gives the suitable
o
structural system according to the span of the hall (short direction). For
example, simple girders are suitable for relatively short spans (7-10 m) while
frames are appropriate for medium spans (12-2Sm). In contrast, arches and
trusses are suitable to cover large spans.
Sec. A-A
Table 1.1 Choosing of structural system according to the span
a- simple beam subjected to uniform loads
Type of structure Span
Simple girders 7~lOm
Frames 12~2S m
Arch with a tie 20~40m
Concrete in compression
Trusses 20~40m
2 3
2
1.2.2 Design of the Arch with a Tie al
t
= 0.156- ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• (1.4)
2
f
One of the most convenient systems for resisting uniform gravity loads is the
two-hinged parabolic arch with a tie. This system is externally statically b t3
determinate and internally once statically indeterminate. a2 = 2 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• (1.5)
80 Alie f
The equation of the axis of the arch according to Fig. (1.2) is given by:
t =Total thickness of the arch.
4f x b =Width of the arch.
y = - - (L-x) ............................................. (1.1)
L2 I =Cross sectional moment of inertia.
Atie =Cross sectional area steel in the tie.
where f =The rise of the arch at the crown.
f = rise of the arch
The amount of tension in the tie varies considerably according thickness of the
L = span of the arch
arch, the steel in the tie, and the rise of arch f However, it is customary to take
the factor A equals 0.95. Thus, the horizontal thrust =the force in the tie
. wxU
The bendmg moment at the crown M == 0.05 - - ................................ (1.7)
8
f Hence, the critical section in the arch girder is subjected to a compressive force
H and a bending moment M. The tie beam, on the other hand, is subjected to an
axial tension force, H. It should be noted the bending moment induced in the tie
x beam due to its own weight is negligible. The span of the tie beam under its
L own weight is the distance between the posts.
Structural analysis of the system can express the value of the horizontal thrust
H as a ratio(A) from the simple beam bending moment. Assuming that modular
ratio between the steel used in the tie and concrete used in the arch is 10, one
can obtain:
W L2
H =A - - ............................................ {1.2)
8f
where
1
A= .... ,............................................. (1.3) Photo 1.2 An arched bridge during construction
1+a; +a2
4 5
1.2.3 Layout ~f a Hall Covered by Arched Girders
In large-span big covered halls, reinforced concrete arches with ties are usually
used as the main supporting elements. In order to get relatively reasonable
dimensions of the arches, the spacing between arches should be in the range of
~ p PPT P? T T , J
10x2.S0=2S.0 m ~
5.0 ms to 7.0 ms. Hangers are provided in order to prevent saging of the ties
under its own weight.
Figure 1.3 shows the layout of the supporting elements of a hall that is 25.0 ms
wide, 36.0 ms long and 5.0 ms clear height. The main supporting element is
chosen as an arch with a tie spanning in the short direction arranged every 6. 0 ®- -- E
ms. ro E
m 0E
Q)
~
ro
U) @
The arch rests on reinforced concrete columns. These columns should provide a "0
U)
X
0
<:
reasonable bearing area to the arch. Out-of-the plane of the arch, these columns 0
0
Q)
0
C\I
are connected together with the semelles, the wall beams and the top beams. en
The horizontal roof consists of horizontal continuous beams supporting the roof A
slabs. These beams transmit their loads to the curved girder of the arch through
a system of short members called posts. These short members serve also to
reduce the span of the tie and consequently reduce the moments due to its own
weight (they hang-up the tie). @---
E ,/
It should be mentioned that the girder of the arch is subjected to a compression o ~ <:0
EO
force and is susceptible to buckling. The arched girders are connected in the
<ri
(') -5 8 .a~
ox
o
II
<~ 00
U)
out-of-plane direction through continuous beams located at the level of the tie <ri U) (')
x (')
CD
as well as at the level of crown. These beams reduce the buckling length of the
girder out-of-the plane of the arch. ©- --
The columns supporting the arches are connected in the out-of-plane direction
using a continuous beam at the top level of the columns and a wall beam at the
mid-height. In case of a weak soil, semelles are provided at the foundation level
in order to connect the footings together to reduce the effect of differential @--
settlements. Otherwise, they could be provided at the bottom end of the frame
leg to support the wall above and reduce the buckling length.
®-
Plan
Fig. 1.3a A hall covered with arches (horizontal roof)
6
7
!=lAtlnnrt"rv beam
(250x550)
Tie Beam
:350x500)
E
o
B-+
Lri
00 II
1:
.2'
Q)
.s::
~
13
Semelle
i,. " (250X600)
Sec. A-A
Fig.1.3b A Hall covered with arches (continued)
.....
Slab
/Th=120mm
·,
~ Arch1350x1000) ~seCOndaiY_Beam ·
(200x550)
Tie Beam Post (200x200) Beam (250x500)
(350x500) \ connecting arches \
·
·
Beam (250X550L1
conhectin;:; columns
CD
Column
(350x1300)
I
I I I
I
I I i' I I
I II
9melle (250x600) I
/
Sec. B-B
Fig. 1.3c A hall covered with arches (c(mtinued)
The dimensions of the arch system can be estimated according to Table 1.2.
Item Dimension E
c E
E 0
tg SpanJ25 :J
:0
0
bg 250-400mm
Oxo C')
10
C')
ttie tt 2
Arch spacing 4~7m
~ '"
f
Roof Angle
Span /(6 -+ 8)
24 0 _ 320
E
til
(J)~
.00
cg
-- ~
Q)
Q)
, .Q
'"=
til
(I)~
:g~
0. 0
lri
C\!
indirect lighting. The horizontal part of the roof consists of horizontal slab .0 0
10 C\! ;..
~IO Q).
supported on continuous beams. These beams are supported by the posts. The til X
-0 0
"0
middle part of the roofis a curved slab supported also on continuous beams that
cO
oC\!
.....;..bJl
o~
-= C.I
;..
co:s
-<=
'o:t;
....
.....oil
r..
E
E
cO
Eg
:J~
o~
010
C')
4.~----------- ________ _
,",Vll'-lvLv ~~ ~
__ 5" Sun f
Frame spacing
Frame Spacing /(2)
4~7m
North light ".,/ " ...
_/~Sunpath Roof Angle 24 0 _ 320
window
Column thickness (0.8 ~ 1.0) tg
Secondary beam thickness Frame spacing /(8 ---+ 10)
Post spacing 2~4m
North Post dimensions 200x200mm
Ridge beam thickness Post spacing /(8 ---+ 10)
South
One should note the difference between Sec. A-A and Sec. B-B. At Sec. B-B
Fig. 1.5 North-light window in saw-tooth roof the inclined simple beams and the roof slabs are at the level of the frame. At
Sec. BooB, these elements are at the top level of the posts. As shown in Sec. C-C,
1.3.1.1 Frames as the Main Supporting Elements the frames are connected together in the out of plane direction at three levels,
Figure 1.6 shows the gen~rallayout of a hall 20.0 ms wide and 33.0 ms long in namely at the girder level, approximately at mid-height of the column (frame
which the north is normal to the short direction and is covered so that a uniform leg) and at the level of the foundations where semelles are provided to' support
distribution of natural light is provided. Reinforced concrete frames are utilized the walls. 200-300mm
~.
as the main supporting elements and are arranged parallel to the short direction Note: As the rain water is accumulated at the
of the hall. . lowest point of the slab, it is essential to
The convenient slope of the roof slab lies between 20° and 30° with the choose -the shape of cross-section of the
horizontal in order to be able to cast. concrete without the use of double girder of the frame in the form of a Y-shape
~~S>7
shuttering. so that there is sufficient space for the rain
water and the necessary slopes for the gutter.
13
12
~N0?
I
-
lij/
<D
~ .co
rn ~o
.ctO
P- ttl x
m (!)o
(]) ,to
'UN
;9
~ 0
ill
.....
1] 8
~
......
:.a <®
~
(])
8-<
(])
-
.~
P-
..!:l
-f:-
1::
0
~
(])
;9
..!:l
c.>
+-E0
M
-
~
(")
II 0
to E to
0
to ttl X
.S x
<0
<D
III 00
S ~
.....m
(])
:>.. -
m
(])
/
o t-
co
S <DO EO
rn E""
ttl~ .=!~
tl:4 ~
LLO
x ox
00
rn to to
l-< ~ ~
<8 -
c.>
1;
(])
S
0
m'
>-<
rn
~
.-< -
ciJ I I
ii:
I· 8x2,50=20.0 m
-I
Plan
Fig.l.6b North light saw-tooth system (Frames)
(North direction is normal to the span)
14
15
- y- b Slab (Th.=100
I 200x200 200x300
D--1' dOD ,/ DO
/
• \ • • • • • 1200
\ Sec. Beam
200x500 \ Frame
350x1400
..... Wall beam :c
~E
0')
250x500
·.c:o
au; Frame
.!!! 11
<.) Column
- RIC Footing
~.(,'<;.(,'<;.(,'<;.(,"
E
0
~
I I ....:'- Semelle I
(250x500) I
I
" , PIC Footing
Sec. A-A
Fig. 1.6c North light saw tooth system (Frames) (cont.)
~=n'W'"i"tdtt 'Z'i"n'W"'MW:- ~.
Slab (Th.=100mm)
Ridge beam
200x300
, Secondary beam
200x500
,
r-
Post /
I \.
\ Frame
200x200 350x1400
.....
" Wall beam
250x500
Frame
Column
----I I
~,(,'{,(,'{,(,X,(,-V
Semelle
(250x500)
~
I
I I I
Sec. B-B
Fig.l.6d North light saw tooth system (frames) (cont.)
,
ents
1.3.1.2 Arches as the Main supporting Elent
Figure L7 shoWS the generallayout of a hall 28.0 ms wide and 36.0 IDS long in
which the north is normal to Ihe short direCtion and is covered so that a uniform
. distribution of natural light is provided. Reinforced concrete arches are utilized
as Ihe main supporting e\ements and are arranged parallel to Ihe short direction
beams.
• The inclined simply supported beams are supported on the
posts acting as compression members at one side and on the
posts acting as tension members at the other side.
• The posts are supported directlY on the arches and are
UI .c::
;.0 connected in the plane of the arch by the ridge beam.
U 0
0
u ;.0
~
CI)
00
<I.l
l:l
J!
.c::
;.0
I-<
0
Z
CI)
1.0
...;
-:!
19
18
N~ cp
t ~ ~ ~
i i i i
~
i
10x2.8=28.0 m
C?i ~ ~ ~
i i i J
®- --~-
!J -B0
0
+->
I
~
®-- --~-
'"
+->
II II II II II II
.-e: II II II II II II
~ I II II II II II II
"€0 @--
s:1
-B
.~ II II II II II II II II II
§ ~ II II II 1/ 1/ II 1/ II 1/ 4-
+->
00
:>,.
II II II II II II II 1/ II
'"
.-e: @--
u....ctI E
~
0
cO II II 1/ II II II II 1/ II
.... (')
u 1/ II II 1/ 1/ II II 1/ II
<8 0
cO \I II II \I II II II \I II
u x
·E <0
Q) @-- ----
S
0 0-
II ~ -.:t
0
0
......
00
II II \I II II 11..<: ~II II
ctI
r--: II II II II II II~ ~II \I 118 x0l()
.-<
1/ II 1/ 1/ 1/ II ~I\ 1/ II
(')
bi:J
~ @-- ----
1/ 1/ II II II II II II II
\I II II \I II II II II II
II II II II \I II II \I II
®- ----
PIan
Fig. 1.7b North-light saw-tooth system (Arches)
20 21
Ser.ondRrv
(200x550)
--
beam
BI (350x1200)
B-+ (350x600)
tv
tv
E
o
r-..:
Semelle
28.00m
Sec. A-A
Fig. 1.7c North-light saw-tooth system (Arches) (cont.)
Girder
Post
200x200
Column
I\)
350x1400mm Wall beam
eN
(250x600mm)
RIC Footing
Sec. B-B
Fig. 1.7d North-light saw-tooth system (Arches) (cont.)
Table 1.4 gives guide lines for choosing the dimensions of the system.
Table 1.4 Recommended dimensions for the frame system
1.3.2 North Direction is Parallel to the Span
Item Suggested dimensions
The concept of having the main supporting elements arranged in the short
direction of the hall is still valid in case the north direction is parallel to the tg Span/(l2-+ 14)
span. Also, the windows have to be arranged to face the north direction.· If the Frame spacing 4-+7m
short direction is not more than about 20.0 ms, it is recommended to use
frames. If, on the other hand, the short direction is more than 20.0 ms, it will be Y-beam spacing 4-+6m
more economic to use trusses.
Roofheight (f) Y-beam spacing/2
Roof Angle 24 ° - 32°
1.3.2.1 Frames as the Main Supporting Elements
Column thickness @top (0.80 -+ 1.0) tg
Figure 1.8 shows the general layout of a hall 22.0 ms wide and 27.0 ms long in Column thickness @bottom (0.4 -+ 0.60) tg
which the north is parallel to the short direction and is covered so that a uniform
distribution of natural light is provided. Reinforced concrete frames ate utilized Secondary beam thickness Y-beam spacing /(8-+ 10)
as the main supporting elements and are arranged parallel to the short direction
Y-beam thickness Frame spacing/(6-+8)
of the hall.
The statical system can be summarized as follows: Post spacing 2-+4m
• The frames are arranged every 5.4 ms in order to obtain a Post dimensions 200x200mm
reasonably economic system. Ridge beam thickness Post spacing /(8-+ 10)
• A system of horizontal continuous beams (called the Y-
beams) is supported on the frames.
• The inclined roof consists of a system of one-way slabs that
are supported on a system of inclined simply supported
beams.
• The inclined simply supported beams are supported on the
posts at one side and directly on the Y-beam at the other
side.
• The posts are supported directly on the Y-beams and are
connected in the plane of the Y-beams by the ridge beam.
These posts can be assumed to resist axial forces only.
24 25
.-
N~
cp ~B ~i ~i ~i
i
[-:---
--0
~
c.:s
~.
Q)
-B
-
....0
~
c;;
t:d
-- --0
p..
.~
.........
,..c::'
0
~
-B
Q)
-- --@
,..c:: V-beam
_. ._---
E
® -I-A
~
C)
0 .200/(300x800)
~ r..:
C\I
"
.....~ "<t
lli
x E
r--
8 l{)
N
....
Q)
-- --@
'":>-.
'"
Q)
g Sec. Beam
~
c.:s 200xSOO
.....
c8 Frame
.£
C)
Q)
--
(3S0x1600)
--@
80
'"
.......
c.:s
~
~
......
? ~
ciJ
I .:-beam Spacing.. I --0
I 4 8
I
4xS.S=22.0 m
14 . 1
Plan
Fig. 1.8b North-light saw-tooth system (Frames)
(North direction is parallel to the span)
_.. -
26 27
Detail-2
Sec. beam
200x500
1400 eJ ,/ ;z:
Detail-1
Frame
V-beam
200/(300x800)
200
~~2S0 35OX1600
~I
N
00
sJo t
Frame ~~
t __ I
il E
.r::.o
«i..o
Wall beam
2S0xSOO
Column
Detail-1
--
1-1
300
Detail-2 :w-,
200
Q) II
C3
fsoa
Section A-A
Fig.1.8c North-light saw-tooth system (Frames) (cont.)
Slab (1 OOmm)
Ridge beam Sec.b
200xSSO ""
, ~ 200xSOO
~
"'
:--
I
/
r
1
V-beam
200/(300x800)
/ Post /
200x200 Frame girder . /
3S0x1600
N Wall beam
1.0
1 2S0xSOO
,
'1 1 /I 1 r 1 T I 1 1
semelle,,~
L
Trusses in reinforced concrete are seldom used and their shape is generally
chosen similar to those constructed in steel. cp cv ~i
One of the disadvantages of reinforced concrete trusses is that formwork of i i Truss
concrete and the detailing of reinforcement are complicated. However, in
-,.-- -
special cases of saw-tooth roofs in which the north is parallel to the span of the
hall, the truss may give a convenient solution. ,0
Figure 1.9 shows the general layout of a hall 20.0 ms wide and 25.0 ms long in
which the north is parallel to the short direction and is covered so that a uniform -- -
distribution of natural light is provided. Reinforced concrete trusses are utilized
as the main supporting elements and are arranged parallel to the short direction
of the hall.
FF-®
• The inclined roof consists of a system of one-way slabs. At
the location of the trusses, the slabs are supported on the
diagonal members. Between trusses, inclined beams are A+ Sec. Beam
A
provided to support the slabs. The inclined beams are simply
supported at posts from one side and directly at the Y-beam
from the other side.
at- Truss
200x500
H- 8
-- -
• The posts are supported directly on the Y-beams and are
connected in the plane of the Y-beams by the ridge beam.
These posts can be assumed to resist axial forces only.
-
c
~
\ End-Gable beam
I 250x800
1- 4x5.0=20.0 m
Plan
Fig. 1.10a North-light saw-tooth system (Truss)
(Noth direction is parallel to thespau)
30 31
Top chord
Ridge beam Vertical members ;
V-beam
Bottom chord
200/(300x900)
W
tv
~I ~
CD
.s::
•
III
Wall beam
lti
CD
II
(3
Sec. A-A
Fig. 1.10b North-light saw-tooth system (Truss) (cout.)
w
w
Wail beam
Sec. B-B
Fig.l.l0c North-light saw-tooth system (Truss) (cout.)
Approximate Analysis of RIC Trusses
Unlike steel trusses, reinforced concrete trusses are subjected to direct loading
from the surrounding slabs. Moreover due to the rigidity of the members
"- ",:g- connecting bending moments are induced. Truss members are mainly subjected
~E to normal force, and therefore bent bars are not used in trusses and the
/ 0::1
·0 i5
100
c!§Cl
reinforcement is distributed symmetrically
E ~~
E ~O
8 E ll!
The internal forces in the members of a truss are:
:::.
.0
cu c:
Ol
m3 0 I- 1- The axial forces due to the concentrated luads at the joints.
cu ,.-...
Ci.i ..,J
_I
= 2- The bending moments and shearing forces due to the direct loads
LJ 't r-
<:)
c:.l
'-" on the members of the truss on which the slabs are supported,
,.-...
t-- '"'" and
<I>
,/" "E
0
.£:
0<1>
~
= 3- The bending moments and shearing forces due to the fact that in
'-"
<I>~
S~
E~
oJ:>
:1::-
s
.....
Q,)
reinforced concrete trusses, the joints are partially rigid.
~~ 00
m The internal forces can be obtained using the computer programs. It
'EE '"
;>.
>
Ol
'"
..= should be noted that the effect of the partial rigidity of the joints has to
_I .....
<:) be evaluated.
c:
u .....
I
<:)
E
::I
f-_ U ~
1:':1 The approximate dimensions of the truss can be obtained from Fig. 1.10.
i5 cl
o Q,)
00
'"
l$ t =t =t = span
=
A
~
1:: t4
1 2 3 36
= (0.8 -0.9) tl
- <:)
Z
't:S
0
.-I
~
oil
~
II
!ij 0
/~--~~~--~~----~I
1-_ _.....fII_I-I"T"'"_ _
.. ""'"T'~_---T-I
OlO
.010
~g f-
·32 C\I
a:
35
34
1.4 Vierendeel Girders
Vierendeel girders are similar to trusses except that they do not have diagonals
as shown in Fig. l.11. Moreover the connecting joints are rigid such that they N~ cp cp cp cp cp cp <? cp cp ~ ?I
develop moment. I. 10x3.5-35.0 m •
Vierendeel girders are often used in transfer floors of high-rise buildings to ®- .!!lo
,/
-
Co
support planted columns giving a wide space in the floor below as shown in E -larce Eo
0
0
Cl.g ::JUl
-
00
x
Fig. l.12. They also can be used in saw-tooth roofs when indirect sunlight is
required as shown in Fig. 1.13a and Fig l.l3b.
<ri
~~ o~
®- --
A Vierendeel girder consists of a top chord. a bottom chord and vertical E
members. The system is externally statically determinate, while it is internally 0
0
<ri
indeterminate. Internally, it is 3n times statically indeterminate, where n is the
number of panels. @- --
E E
o:s E C~
The exact analysis of a Vierendeel girder is quite complicated. In the past, EO
@
~~<ri
Ql
!Xl 0 ::JC\I A
approximate solutions were used to calculate the force in the different members. <>
0
<0 ox
Ql
(J) 0
X 0°
...°
Nowadays, computer programs are used to compute the straining actions. In 0
C\I
such a case, the members are modeled as 2D frame elements, while the joints ®- -
are modeled as rigid joints that permit moment transfer among members. E
0
0
<ri
Ivieren eelGir er
®- -
'- II JI IrOUX;j~pU mm II _II II - II -II - - '--
Plan
100000000 1
I _m ""'" I
""Om", . ri Id·_ -
Columns
- -
- - - L- ' - -
Section A-A
36
37
d
1
cp 0) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I I
I I I ~I I
1Ox3.5=35.0 m
~i
-?
I
~I DODD 00000
0-- ,/
I 3.50m I VierendeelGirder
~~
(1\10
co
EO
Column 400x3000m m
C)( ::110
-)( 400x1200
-gg 00
010 Wall Beam
wC\l C\I
@--
RIC footing
PIC footing
@-- E E 1!;
(1\
E Co
<II
@> EC\I Section A-A
~
m 0
0 ::I~
-)(
c.i CD 00
)(
<II
en 0 O~
0
C\I
®--Eo
~o
~ ~ieren selGir ~r
®--- ~OOx3( pOmm
®-- Column
400x1200
Wall beam
250x500
@)--- Semelle
RIC Footing 250x500
@--
d- Section B-B
Plan
Fig.l.13b Vierendeel girder
Fig.l.13a Vierendeel girder
38 39
Summary
T
Figure 1.14 gives guidelines for choosing the appropriate structural system I!
when indirect light is needed according to the span and the direction of the
north.
lil
ti
>-
f V-beam
1.5 Expansion and Settlement .Joints en
c:
·iii
::2
In the construction of reinforced c..oncrete structures, two types of joints may be
considered namely, expansion jOints and settlement joints
r-
1.5.1 Expansion .Joints
Expansion joints are provided to reduce the effect of temperature. Thermal <e-t 1--1- Frame with V-beam (L < 20 m).
effects induce additional straining actions that lead to additional reinforcement 2- Truss l=20 -40m)
l...-
in the structural members. For example, continuous beams running over several
spans are affected by the stresses induced due to temperature. The ECP 203 A-Main system parallel to the north
specifies the use of these joints when the dimensions of the building exceed 30-
35 m in hot regions and 40-45 in warm regions.
Span (L)
Expansion joints are achieved by a complete vertical separation in the super- I t-B
structure at the location of the joint. This is usually achieved by placing foam I
It should be mentioned that the requirements of the ECP 203 can be waived if
'mcD r- 2- Arch with a tie(L=20 - 40m)
the designer carry out an analysis that takes into account the temperature k=dt-l--==:::j g '- 3- Vierendeel ( L=30 - 40m)
CJ)
effects.
...l
+-B
B-Main system normal to the north
40 41
T E
E
®-
C\I
~
@-
i 8
f',
~
E m
0 0 0-
Ol
®-~~
or-
en
OlO
15x
0
10
0
toX c8 E~ ~
EO lU~ a-Detail of Expansion Joints at the roof
10
::I~
o~
010
U:~ tID E
lU
Ol
(') .a
G-
(')
1ij
3: Bituminous
material
~ ....
0- c
=
g
a
.Q
til
c-
I~~
x-
Ol
Ii ~
~
('II
~
e- ~
I)~
~
('II
\""4
~
e- !il
Ol
m 10
x
0
0 ~
M
f;I;l
.~
0 ~
0 0
Ol C\I
en
0-~ 0 Ol~
18 Column Column
to E~
'It
0
lUX
U:~ Insulation
(')
e--~
material
0
cO
E~
::IX tID
015
0(')
G-
b-Two columns and the same footing
...-
1
Fig. 1.16 Expansion joints details
42 43
1.5.2 Settlement Joints
This type of joints is related to height rather than length. If the loads of two
adjacent columns differ significantly, the differential settlement becomes large
and could affect the foundation. This is can occur in case of low rise building
adjacent to high rise building as shown in Fig. 1.14. The footings in this case 1 1
should be completely separated (20 mm apart) to allow the settlement of each high rise
column to take place independently. building Settelment
joint
high rise
building
Settelment
I joint
Low rise
~
/ -~ building
'---' '---'
.
,,-<. L-....J
Oetail-A
L--J
SectIOn 1-1
Photo 1.6 Settlement joints is provided between low and high-rise buildings
Beam
Settelment
Plain Concrete joint
Raft Detail-A
44
45
1.6 End gables
3-6m 3-6m
End gable consists of a group of columns supporting continuous beams instead ~econdary beam
of the typical frames used as the main system of the hall as shown in Fig. l.ISa.
~
The spacing between the columns is chosen in such a way that the area Of the I
E Wall area.:
enclosed walls should not be more than 2S-30 m2 . This is to facilitate the
~
'i
<')
(25-30 m")
construction of the brick wall, to reduce its buckling length, and to increase its
capacity for resisting wind loads.
Wall beam End gable
If a future extension of the hall is expected, another system is provided at the I E I I I I Column
"<t
end as shown in Fig. l.lSb. In such a case, a frame is used at the end of the
hall. End gable consists of a group of columns that are connected to the frame - M
I -.I_
Floor Level
I I
_. r •
,
by dowels to reduce their buckling length and to allow for possible future \ . \ R.C. footiflQ.
'\semelle Plain Concrete
demOlishing the wall. The length of the dowels should not be less than the footing
development length of the steel bars (Ld) as shown in Fig. l.ISc. Moreover, Sec A-A
compressible material should be provided to allow for the deflection of the
secondary beam
, Wall beam
I End gable
(Column,
I t
11
a-Plan (future extension is not required)
3-6m 3-6m
Detail C
/ Main girder
I \
I .1 1
Maingirder
R
Wall area.:
Compressible Frame
(25:30m2)
matenal Column
dowels
Wall beam End gable
End gable
~ Column I E I I I Column I
Detail C
;r, Floor Level
I--
I I .1.
I 1
8 B
Photo 1.7 A multistory reinforced concrete building b-Plan (future extension is required)
46
47
Solution
A-Wrokshop
Since the span of the hall is relatively large, and indirect lighting is required,
RC frames are utilized as the main structural element. The spacing between the
frames is chosen as S.Om.
~------------------__-L________~ ~
a B-Storage Area
/-- -/- A simple girder spanning 8.0 ms is chosen for the storage area. The spacing
16m 8m between these girders is taken the same as that between the frames (S.Om).
Plan Secondary beams are provided to get reasonable slab dimensions (S.O x4.0 ms).
. Spall 8x1000
Glrder depth = - - = =800 mm
10 10
0
s The layout of the workshop is given in the following set of figures.
r...: S
0
or)
Section
48
49
I ex5.0=30.0 m I I
/'
, !-I-
T
'I>
~
Beam
End-Gable col.
250x500.........
~ Z
(200x500)
....
~
~
CXI
X
~ I\)
~
;... 8
;... .!!..
en
=
00
::;-
0
3
Frame ~.;
(350x1300) ""'"
VI ....
1'==:1
- I.--
..,==
0
~ m+- ®
'"
~ Column
....
a 1\3[[
(350x1100)"
C/)
'i en _
! I
CXI
~
CXI
o
..9
CD
<9.
a.
~ Beam
®
0
3 (200x500)
Column
(250x500N
o ® @ @ ~~ ~. ~
D~ 10001 liDO
I
\ • • • • • Simple Girder
Slab (Th.=120mm)
\sec. Beam
200x500 \ Frame
350x1300
(250xBOO) \
,
Column
Wall beam i (350i<1100)
:c
250x500 '" !3
.<:lo
VI
....... :a~ '1il' E
.c:o
011 tuLri
.2! II
0
I- 18m 9m
-I
Plan
Skylight
f T:l
Q)o
E~
<11 x
~O
LLIO
I
C'l
r-
S -r-
r- S S
'11 Irl
Irl ..f
Section elevation
52 53
Solution
A-Main Hall
Since the span of the main hall is relatively large, RC frames are used as the
~
main structural elements. Posts supported on the girder of the frames are
utilized to support the skylight roof.
The spacing between the frames is chosen as 5.0m. i-®
-
"51
<'>0
., I
Iii
.co
~~
.,0
:o~
Item Suggested dimensions Chosen dimensions (!l0 "0
~l!J
.10
-gC\l
w ill
tg Span/(12-t 14) = 18/14 = 1.28 m == l.3m -
o
II --@
.0
x
s s
~ 0~ .,~~
<0
Post dimensions 200x200mm 200x200mm x
.. m a:lg
~ ~
- --@
/ L /
~
'.~~ ~s
cO
B-Office area E~
1ii~
Ox
0.0 u.~
::I~
o~
-fQ
00
0 010 U'"
An inclined simple girder spanning 9.0 ms is chosen as the main supporting ~
10
~ ~ ~
Simple Ilirder
element for the office area. The spacing between these girders is taken the same -
250x90 )
--@
as that between the frames (5.0m). Secondary beams are provided to get
reasonable slab dimensions (5.0 x3.0 ms).
. Span 9x1000
Glrder depth = - - = = 900 mm
10 10 - --(£)
The layout of the car workshop is given in the following set of figures.
,.
I
8x2.25=18.0 m
·1·
I
9.0m .,
Fig. Ex.1.2a Structural system (plan)
54 55
Example 1.3: Structural system for a medical facility
Ir- The figure below shows a medical facility that consists of two large halls
covered with horizontal roof. Hall (1) spans 18.0 ms while hall (2) spans 15.0
ms. Columns are only allowed on the outside perimeter. Clear height of the
t
8 ~ 0
s halls is 6.0m. It is required to suggest an appropriate structural system.
!
iii
!
~
~
rn
'" I WOS'v=
I t41l!84 JIl810
.-- l-
tl
]s A A
00
.!! :s
~'"
tnt:!, (1)
r- 00
"ii
~
I-
E
GI
&to
E
c:
CIl ::J
0
GIS
=g
Gl
Eox
GlIO
rn~
a__ t~o:e~ __ ~ _._----------.....1
b
~
C7.i
~
I- WO'L=
t46!84 JIl810 WO'~
~t
0 (2)
'-.... 0
Glen
E~ E
~ ~~ o
~ cO
::: 11.10
en
"ii
til
V o
~l
o
Eo ~
8lg
COx
-I
0 '0
u; l§
0
0
0
C\I
D.. C\I V
go
rnC\l I~ 15 m -I' 20m
V Cl
g Plan
c: '5
~ 0
11.
0
Eo
~
11.
CIlO
I
~
GlIO Q
I ~
-.0 X
0 a:
~ ~
I~
Section A-A
57
56
Solution
Hall (1)
Since the span of the hall is relatively large, and north light is not required, a
frame system with secondary horizontal beams is chosen. The spacing between
the frames is chosen as 5.0m, while the spacing between the secondary beams is A -
taken as 3.0 m.
C\l
Column thickness
Secondary beam
0.80 tg
t i' ~
\ Frame
A-J Column
300x800/1100
Hall(2) 400x1600
®- B ~
expansion joint
CD- Detail C
C\l
58 59
Example 1.4: Structural system for a textile factory
.1 The figure given below shows a textile factory that consists of two large halls in
which indirect lighting is needed. Hall (1) spans 20 m and Hall (2) spans 19.2m.
Columns are only allowed on the outside perimeter. Clear height of the halls is
S.Sm. It is required to suggest an appropriate structural system for the factory .
~~~ •
mg
~~
~~
'ai
E
Q)
fI)
Q)
S'
~
I
A
-I- (1)
-+
S
~~
-~ ~
"1
-< Columns are not
0
C'l
0
0
Q)(')
E~
=
.."
0
l:l
C.I
cu
a
_-'~I~~ed___ ~ _ b
~
.."
I- e~
u.g ~
'-'
E ~
S ""<t
.a E
a:J V -< ....cu
Ci5 §
<cJ cJ .."
.. a)
Cf.l
>.
....=
.." N
" mO'9==
llf<!!l>qlIlI>I:::>
cu
Cf.l
....'=
"'
C.I
....=
'"'
Cf.l
(2)
@ S
;:!i
Ia ,.Q
«")
~
0
0 g ~
~ f;r;l
0
• Cd
Eo
~
""
.e
0 c
0
0 ....r..ten
:lCO
0 c·
o~
a: 'iii
-\
00
(')
... .0::
..1- \- 19.2m -\ - 24 m
- .... ,
> Plan
"- ':
1 b Section A-A
1
60 61
I
·~ Solution Hall(2)
1. c.•.••.. with
Hall (1) Since the north light is perpendicular to the span, a frame system
, secondary beams is chosen. The spacing between frames is taken as 4.0m
Since the .span of the h~1I is relatively large, and north light is required, a frame
system w~th Y -bean.:s IS chosen. The spacing between the frames is chosen as
Suggested Chosen dimensions
4.8m, whIle the spacmg between the secondary beams is taken as 2.4 m to get a Item
system of one-way slabs (2.4xS.0 ms). The spacing of the Y-beams is chosen
equal to S.O ms. dimensions
4~7m 4.0m
tg Spanl(12~ 14) = 20/14 = 1.43 m == l.5m Frame spacing
200x200mm 200x200mm
Secondary beam Beam spanl(8~ 10) =Smx1000/1O =SOOmm Post dimensions
= 2400/8 - 300mm
Y-beam Span/(6~8) = 4.8/6 =0.80 m Ridge beam thickness Post spacing 1(8~ 10)
63
62
~ ~i ~'I 61c:4.0=24.00
~, ~,I tJ>,~I o;! OJ
0.42 4x5.0=20.00
~
I /1"1' I I I
-
\. .JO
--6
I'!Ij
---8
t(a. f
N @>
~
1>'1
;..
t.
..a.
---8
UI
:r:.. N
CI
~
....
rJ'.l ---0
,.f---@ ~z
"'I Beam
=
....
l"I
,/ ~
200x500
0\
~
= -!- -
-
~
....
tJ
f Il
~,.........
8x 0()
ex> -c:
o
o 3
:13
~::tJ
0",
~(\)
0
0
~llJ
o(\)
x~3
.9
'"
.J- ~(\) ~'":s:::
'" 8 .
5
ijlx-n
-.·No;
g 83
--+ coII
~
COL.-<§)
~
I~
e :::.:
I\:)
0
:::l
lsi: 0 (\)
Frame
(400x1500)
-
o ;a
S- ~
,e
~
u.
~
00
---8
t1!,
~ ~~ @> -~B
0
0
~ () ---@
ex> 0
1[ I 1~
0 o
o -c:
m. I :::t
I\:)
g
~
()
8'--
I\:)
0
---8
8~
otT
o(\)
-'-
X '"
~3
--@
0
~
/100mm
I
Sec. beam
200x400 L
Ridge beam
200x300 /
Ri~ebeam
200x300 L Sec. beam
l::UOxoUO
Slab (100mm)
---'--
--,
~ ----..!
1200 \ I
Post
Post
1\ Frame 200x200
\ Frame 400x1500
:cCl 400x1400 200x200 Wall beam
.(5
E Wall beam I--
0\ .c: It) 250x500 I-----'
Vl 250x500
Frame ffi LO
Q) Column I
Column (3 II
400x800!1200 I
-r R.C. footing
~ ~
y,
'"
• Plain conc.
Footing ""- R.C. footing Semelle
Sec. A-A
~
T
b
N I
I
~o
mo
.oil')
00
.x
mo
enC\l
1- 16m 16m
WS·S=
Roof Ground floor plan
~
o
mO
E E~ E
First floor
al X
S
~
E ~o alo
mo
LLo
....8 ~ .oil')
1iig
1.0
$:C\I
Ground floor S
trl
~
Section
67
66
A: Structural System the First Floor
Since horizontal floor is required, a continuous frame system with secondary
beams is chosen. The spacing between frames is taken as 6.0m
all
Item Suggested Chosen dimensions
C? <V i~ CV ~ ,~ ~
CVi i I I I I <if
dimensions j• 10x3,O-30,O m
.i
ta Span/(12-+ 14) =16/14=1.14m ::::1.2m ®- <:7
" .~
bg
Frame spacing
250-+400mm
4-+7m
0.35mm
6.0m @)--
C!l
-g
W I E8
,,10
-
00
x
010
(\I
@--
Secondary beam Beam span/(8-+ 10) = 6 m x 1000 110 =600 mm
Post spacing 2-+4m 3m
Post dimensions 200x200mm 2POx200mm @--
68 69
fj • ~j ~j
t
r
j7xS.O=42.0 ml
~ ~j ~i ~
_I
II I
I
I
,"".
I I , .
z
....~
<!CI
~
.~
~ -B
~
i.h
r:T'
....
CI.l
"'I -e
=
....
n 8
= -I- -08
-..l
0
~
....
-"'I
~
rI.I
~
~-fu;\
fo"--O
-t
('C o
a I r- - - --1'-= = = ==11== = = II
g-e
S'
"'I 3
....
=- -G
('C
"'I
Q
1L__ Jl!5;;~~O ®
" " -e
Q
.....
-
~
~
e -B
, , ,
! I ; ~, , , , ~~:!
-®
....,
d~
-r
s---- b--_... Ridge Beam .Arch
-._ ..
\JJQU 8
Th=120mm\ (200XSOO)\ (200x300mm) ~ (350x1300)
,
~1~~d~D
DO ~~"'
DDb0~
/v--
I '-II
• •
./
"-
•
I I I
r:r TieBeam /
end beam
250x500
I ~
(350xS50) 1:
.2'
.s:: 0E
Q)
....
to -l-
~ II
u
I I
-..l Slab (Th.=100mm)
......
/
1500
~ ill
• • I
• • • •
1000
I Sec. Beam \ Frame I
200x550 350x1200
1:
Wall beam .~ E Wall beam
250x500 .s:: 0 250x500
....
I
U
til LI'i
.!!! II
Frame
Column I +-8 I
- l-
....~i
RIC Footing Semelle RIC Footing
I (250x500) I I
...t
PIG FootiTlg PIC Footing/
Fig. Ex1.5 c Sec. A-A
Example 1.6: Arch with a Tie
It is required to design a saw-tooth structural system for the factory shown in
2
the figure below. The material properties are!cu=30 N/mm2 and.t;,=360 N/mm .
2
Live load = 1.0 kN/m
2
Flooring load = 1.0 kN/m
2
Wind load = 0.7 kN/m
Clear height =7.5 m
3
Ywau=12 kN/m
Span =26.0m
@
s0 ~
j:Q
U)
~ E cj S
10 E ~
0\
~ 8 rJ.l «)
E
111- .ou
.!!I.e:
't:I
15 0
Q)
m wI::. 0
0
lrl
"Eo Q)C\I l""I
. - t')
=a EX
lo<
~
3: 0
111
~IO
L1.t') eil
Ii:
Ol
c
""&.
E
E
111
Q)
S
0
\. 26m
·1
~
Eo 0U)
11110
Q)U) E
co m
.ox EO a; ~
Q)o .2~
10
j=::g 0)( 3: ~ Plan
00
t')
Ol
~ S
&. II")
0
ii:: r-.:
Section
73
72
Solution
The span of the factory is relatively large (>20 m) such that the choice of a
frame system leads to an uneconomical solution. Since the span of the factory N~
ali
is normal to the north direction, an arch with a tie is chosen as the main
structural system.
<VI • ~i CP'
I
0!
,
I
~ ~i ~i ~i ~i ~i Ii~
I
10x2.6=26.0 m
Assume the following dimensions: G
<II
Slab thickness ts = 120 mrri II II II II II~~II II ~g II II
Ridge beam = (200 mm x 300 mm) II II II II U-g f5 II 118 ~tll II
II II II II IIw""lI II "" II II
Secondary beam = (200 mm x 550 mm)
Post dimension = (200 mm x 200 mm)
CD- ---
II II II II II II
Span of the arch =26m II II II II II II
tg= span/25 ~ LOrn Girder (350 mm x 1000 mm) II II II II II II
ttie =0.5 tg =0.5m Tie (350 mm x 500 mm) ®- - - -
Spacing between arches =6.5m A II II II II II II II II II A
Secondary beams spacing =2.60m -I- II II II II II II II II II -t-
II II II II II II II II II
The rise of the arch equals (f) = span = 26.0 = (3.25 - 4.33) = 3.5 m
6-8 6-8 E
0
cD
(')
II II II II II II II II II
0
\I II II II II II II II II II
{~= 8.5 =O.56m
on
<ri
x II II II II II II II II II
co
The thickness of the column equals 15 15 ©- ---
span = 26 =1.3 m 0
1I.e 811 II ~
0
20 20 II II II II II II (')
®- - - -
II II II II II II II II II
II II II II II II II II II
II 1\ II II II II II 1\ II
A
al-+ Plan
Fig. Ex.l.6a: N~rth-light saw-tooth system (Arches)·
74 75
Step 1: Design of solid slabs
8 Ridge Beam Assume that the slab thickness ts=120 mm
. . (200x300mm)
The total dead load of the slab and flooring load are equal to:
2
gs = ts xYc + flooring = 0.12x25+1.0 =4.0 kN 1m
I
1I
2
8 (350x500) wsu =1.4xg s +1.6xps = 1.4x4+1.6xl.O =7.2 kNlm
Column
I
(350x1300)
E w=7.2 kNlm'
IJlI IJI
It)
r..:
I
II I I I
5l
E
<Xl
ci I .\
RIC footin
E
~ I- 2.6m
_14
2.6m
-I· 2.6m
PIC footin 26.00m
Sec. A-A
4.87kN.m
~ 4.87kN.m
Tie beam Wall Beam The slab is a one-way slab (2.6 m x 6.5 m) and continuous in the short
350x500 250x600 direction, thus the maximum moment is given by:
Column
350x1300mm Wall beam
M = wsuxI! 7.2x2.6 2
250x600 4.87 kN.m
u 10 10
Assuming 20 mm cover, the effective depth d =120 - 20 = 100 mm
6
4.87 X 10 = 0.0162
Semelle 30x1000x100 2
250x600 -J..!-
A
Sec. B-B For small values of R, 0) can be approximated by 1.2R. Thus, the reinforcement
Fig. Ex.l.6b: North-light saw-tooth system (Arches) index w=0.019
77
76
As = {J)X feu xbxd = 0.019x 30 x 1000 x 100 =1584 mm2
fy 360 .
A 0.6 0.6
•• min =J;b d = 360 x 1000 x 100 = 166mm 2 <As .... £J.k
The beam is simply supported on the post (compression member) on one side
o Mu=130.34 kN.m
and on the hanger (tension member) on the other side.
N
.....
o
I
ts==120mm Mu = Wu xLxL' = 21.73x6.5x7.38 =130.34 kN.m
)
V)
V)
8 8
The reaction of the secondary beam is
/. 2600mm
-/
Rb = Wu xL' = 21.73x7.38 = 80.21 kN
2 2
Since the secondary beam is an inverted beam, the section at mid-span acts as
Cross-section of the secondary beam (acts as a rectangnlar section) rectangular section as previously shown. .
d = t - cover = 550 - 50 = 500 mm
6
R= Mu = 130.34xI0 =0.087
feu xbxd 2 30x200x500 2
From the chart, the reinforcement index (J) =0.112
78
79
f. .
A = {J)x-E!1...xbxd::::
30
0.112x-x200x500 = 933 mm 2
S fy 360
ASmill =smaller of
{
0.225JJ:: b d = 0.225Fo x200x500=342 mm2
fy 360
l' IiI J
, , 'ITI ,
wu=4.98 kNlm /
No slab load is transferred to the ridge beam. The cantilever part is considered
as shown in figure below.
2.80 Rr=12.95 Rr=12.95
A,~. =
post
0.225JJ:: b d = 0.225.J3Q x 200 x 250 = 171 mm 2
smaller of { Iy 360
1.3A. = 1.3 X 45 = 58.5 mm 2 f-
80
81
Pow == 1.4 x Ye xb xt xhp = 1.4 x 25xO.20xO.20x2.75 = 3.85 kN
Step 4: Design of post (200x200 mm) The load acting on the post results from the reactions of the ridge beam and the
Posts in the arch with a tie system are subjected to tension or compression secondary beam
according to their locations as shown in the figure below Pu = po.w + Pb (secandry beam) + Pr (ridge beam) = 3.85 + 80.21 + 12.95 = 97 kN
Since the factory has no special system for resisting the lateral forces, it is
considered unbraced. The effective length factor k can be obtained from Table
6-10 in the code. The top and the bottom part of the column are considered
Tension post (200x200) case 1. Thus k=1.2.
(hanger) He = kxhp = 1.2x2.75 = 3.30 m
Compression post
The slenderness ratio A is given as A = He = 3.3 = 16.50
200x200 t pas' 0.2
Tie (350x500) Since A greater than 10, the post is considered long and additional moment is
developed.
2
15 = A? xt = 16.5 x 200 = 27.2 mm (note t5avg . = 15)
2000 2000
82 83
Using interaction diagram with uniform steel/y=360 N/mm2, and S=0.8 The total loads on the arch are the summation of the unif0rm and the
The point is below the chart use J.Lmin concentrated loads.
Since the column is long the minimum reinforcement ratio J.Lmin equals A: Uniform loads
Jlmin = 0.25 + 0.952 A, = 0.25 + 0.052 x 16.5 = 1.1 % 1. own weight of the arch
1.1 2
=1.4xyc xbxt =1.4 x 25xO.35x1.0 =12.25 kN 1m'
A",min =Jlmin X b xt =-x200x200 =443 mm 2. own weight of the tie
100
Choose (4cf> 12, 452 mm2) =1.4xyc xbxt = 1.4 x 25x0.35xO.5 = 6.125 kN I m'
Step 4.2: Design of the tension post (Hanger) W .
ow
= w arch + wtie = 12.25 + 6.125 = 18.375 kN 1m'
The reaction on the tension post (T) B: Concentrated loads
= o. w. + Reaction from secondary beam + Tie weight
1. reaction from the post = 97 kN
2. reaction from the secondary beam =Pb=80.21 kN
Tie weight =1.4xyc xb Xt X post spacing
p" = PpOSI + ~ = 97 + 80.21 = 177.21kN
Tie weight =1.4x25xO.35xO.50x2.6 = 15.925kN
2.6 2.6
.. I .. ..I
- ('\r -('\r - r
post
I I
I I
>- i i ~ Ppost=97
~
I I
I I
I 2.6 I Tie (350x500)
j- -i
'----~~~beam
load to the tie
T = 3.85 + 80.21 + 15.925 = 99.98 kN
A = T = 99.98xlOOO = 319 mm 2
S Iy 11.15 360/1.15 To simplify the calculations of the bending moment, the concentrated loads 'on
the arch can be replaced by a uniform load as follows:
Choose (4cf>12, 452 mm2)
9xl77.21 = 61.345kN I m'
26
Step 5: Design of the arch and the tie
The total uniform load on the frame equals
Step 5.1: Calculations of the loads
84 85
"
The determination of the internal force in the arch can be performed using a
Wu = WOoW + Weq = 18.375 + 61.345 = 79.72kN/m' structural analysis program. As an approximation, the internal forces can be
The concentrated loads on the sides can be estimated by 0.6 Pu=106.33 kN obtained as follows:
Arch
Compression, C =1828.4
L=26m
I- ~I Post
Tension, T=1828.
87
86
uP ' 1828.4x1000 0 WI =cwxqwxspacing =0.8xO.7x6.5=3.64 kNlm' (windward side)
---=--= . = .174
feu xbxt 30x350xlO00 w2 = cl xqw X spacing = 0.5xO.7x6.5 = 2.275 kN 1m' (leeward side)
6
Mu = 336.8x10 =0.032 The columns are linked together with the arch-with-a-tie system. Such a system
2
feu xbxt 30x350x1000 2 . can be simulated by an equivalent link member subjected to either tension or
Assuming the concrete cover is 80 mm. Thus the factor S equals compression.
T
The column is subjected to an axial load in addition to wind loads on the walls.
A. Wind loads tr)
~ 00
Assuming the extension of the column to the foundation is 1.0 m, the height of ~
II
the column equals to:
h = clear height + extention of the column to the foundation = 7.5 + 1.0 = 8.5 m
a b
113.0 100.67
The system is once statically indeterminate. The unknown is the force in 'the
link member. Using the principle of superposition, one can obtain the
y deflection at the end of each column as follows:
The intensity of the wind load on the walls is given as 0.7 kN/m 2• Thus, the
pressure on the walls equals to:
88 89
WXh4 Txh 3
/).=--±--
8EI 3EI column
wall beam
/). = WI Xh4 Txh
+_ _
3
W_
/). =--",-2 Xh4 Txh 3 250x,600
1 8 EI 3 EI 2
_
8EI 3EI
waIToeam
250x600 /!.- ,olu~
Neglecting the axial defonnation in the equivalent link member, the deflection a-- I
\0
of the first column /).1 must be equal to the lateral deflection of the second 0_ -
column /).2.
= /).2
~
/).1 'r:
C')
Xh4 Txh 3
w 2 xh
4 3
WI
--.!.._-+-- = -Txh
--
8 EI 3 EI 8 EI 3 EI 'r:
I(")
00
Simplifying the tenns gives the axial force in the link member (T). - r-: Ik
0-
\0
..s::
0_ -
T = 3xh (W2 - WI) = 3x8.5 (2.275-3.64) = -2.175 kN (compression)
16 16
2 2
~
MI = WI xh +Txh = 3.64x8.5 + (-2.175)x8.5 =113.0 kN.rn oq
2 2 C')
II
2 2 .d'
M = xh w2
Txh= 2.275x8.5 (-2.175)x8.5=100.67 kN.rn
222 ~
....
B. Vertical Loads I I
I I
The vertical loads on the column is the summation of the following:
1. Self-weight = 1.4xyc xbxtxh = 1.4x25xO.35x1.3x8.5 = 135.36 kN 1 r
0.35 +_·-!-·-l·_·_·_· x
2. Weight of the wall beams: two wall beams are provided as shown in the TI i I
1.30
following figure.
= 2x1.4xyc xbxt xspacing = 2x1.4x25xO.25xO.6x6.5 = 68.25 kN
90 .91
Item X-Direction Y -Direction Step 9: Geometric coordinates of the arch
bracing condition unbl,"aced braced The formula for the construction of the arch is given by:
Ultimate load P u (kN) 1545.59 1545.59
y = 4· f· x· (L- x) = 4· 3.5· x· (26 - x) = 0.0207. (26x-x2)
Short column if A<lO A<15 L2 26 2 •
Mu(wind) 113.0 0
Mtot = Mu+ Madd 222.95 0
I- L=26m
-I
It is clear from the previous table that the X-direction is more critical than Y-
direction. Using an interaction diagram with uniform distribution of reinforcing
steel and with/y= 360 N/mm 2 and S= 0.8, one gets:
~Mwind
Pu = 1545.59xlO00 = 0.113
feu xbxt 30x350x1300
~M.'dd
M ,O' = 222.95 x 10
6
=0.012 1 :
0.351·_·_·!"···3·········
30x350x1300 2
2 X
feu xbxt
T I" 1:30"1
The intersection point is below the chart. Use J.tnnn.
Since the column is long, the minimum reinforcement ratio J.tnnn is given by:
92 93
f::::2
\C
.j:>.
. zglSZO A
z~ZO 4g/S20
JrnI_5@Stm.
1~
2S1t512
o
g 5¢10/m
.....
~ 2S1t512
Sec. A-A
16¢518
4S1t525 -----
~
. 4g/S25
~Ilr
I
[ r ]j
1300..
~I
I
I::...- r= 2g/S25
Drr
.--- 2g/S25
rl
2 g/S 25
r--- 4S1t525 '4S1t525
.-~
Post
\C 0'
o!
Vl 5¢8/m
J
2¢P12 'I II ~C')I
'\.,1
..... I
I IL L L L L
.. ,
~
I
I h ... J1 ... >.
I
2¢P12
I
Detail of ridge beam
~~~,~rnr~f
~~
Elevation
Reinforcement details of ridge beam [..2QQ.-l
Post detail
Reinforcement Details of the Arch (cont.)
r
I
Example 1.7: Frame with the north direction is normai to span Solution
The figure below shows the general layout of a workshop that is covered by a Step 1: Propose the concrete Dimensions
structural system that permits indirect lighting. It is required to carry out a
complete design of the roof for such a system. Since the north direction is perpendicular to the sp~' a'i-td the spa~ ~quals to
20.0 ms, a system of frames is chosen.
The material properties are /cu=35 N/mm2,/y=360 N/mm2 and/ysF240 N/IIlIll2
Assume the following dimensions:
= 100mm
Ridge beam = (200 mm x 300 mm)
~.~ -~.,!o- \~...
I I~
The slab ultimate load Wu is given by:
2
wsu =1.4xgs +1.6xps =1.4x3.S+1.6x.5=5.7 kNlm
Section
96 97
G
~/
Ql
.a
QlO
:og
to X
Go
• 10
-gC\l
w
-®
Frame
II Column
<@)
B
A - I--
I I r RIC Footing ~
.....
Semelle
(250x500)
,I
"-
I· 8x2.50=20.0 m
·1
PIC Footina
Sec. B-B
I-l
700
Fig. Ex 1.7a Structural System (plan) Fig. Ex 1.7b Structural System (Sections)
98 99
Step 3: Design of the secondary beam (200 mm x 500 mm)
~ ,
w=5.7 kNlm' I
The beam cross-section is 200 mm x SOO mm (from step 1).
I· 2.5 m
·1· 2.5m
-/-
2.5m
./ w u,o,w = 1.4xYe xb xt = 1.4x2SxO.20xO.SO = 3.S kN 1m'
The spacing between the secondary beams is 2.5m, thus the total beam load is
Wu = wu,o,w + spacing X wsu = 3.5 + S.7 X 2.S = 17.75 kN I m'
':'"j.'
~
.
, .',' .
.-.... - ..
,
3.56 kN.m
The roof slab is a system of one-way slabs that are continuous in the short
direction, thus the maximum negative bending at the support equals to:
\ . 21
XL2 2
M = wsu =5.7X2.5 =3.56kN
u 10 10 .m
6
3.56x10 Rb=49.61
-- - - - = 0 .01 6 on frame
35x1000x80 2
From the chart with R=O.016, the reinforcement index 01= 0.0186
The inclined length L' is equal to
As = OJ x leu xbxd =0.0186x 35 x 1000 x 80 = 144.8 mm 2 /m'
Iy 360 L' = ..)2.5 2 + 52 = S.S9 m
100 101
The section at mid-span is a T-section and the width B is given by: 2 2
W xL
M =-=-u_-, 3.525x2.5 = 2.20kN.m
u 10 10
16ts +b {16X100+200 = 1800 mm
_ L 5590 Rr =wu xL=3.525x2.5=8.8125 kN
B -thesmaller of --7. S+b = -5-+200=1318 mm
{
CL --7 CL 2500 mm
w u=3.525 kNlm'
B= 1318 mm.Using C1-J curve and assume that c < ts
C1=d I ~ =4501
6
62.02x10 =12.27
II J II? I I II ,,
,
t 1:
V~ 35x1318 11--__ 2.5 ---+-1'-- 2.5 '1
i
i
The point is outside the curve, thus c/d)min = 0.125 andj = 0.825
i
~~q
0.91
a =0.8xc = 0.8xO.125x450 = 45 mm
= Mu = ----~-
62.02 x 10
6
. 1.84 RrS.812 RrS·812 I
A = 464 mm 2
s fy xl xd 360xO.825x450 \
To use the R·m, calculate R
0.225JiC 0.225£ 2
6
As min = smaller of fy bd = 360 x 200 x 450 = 333 mm R= Mu = 2.20x10 = 0.005
2
{ feu xbxd 2 35x200x250
1.3 As = 1.3x464 = 603 mm 2
Choose 3$16 (600 mm 2
)
From the chart with R=0.005, the reinforcement index OJ= 0.0058.
I~5~ I 100 2
but not less than 0.15 xbxd = 0.15 x200x250 =75mm
100 100
T 0
0
<"l
2
Thus, A s,mill=75 mm > As, use Asmin
2
Use 2$ 12 (226.2 mm )
:::.....j 200 I-
102 103
' • •S'C""
Step 5: Design of the post (200x200 mm) Step 6: Design of the frame (350 mm x 1400 mm)
The factored self-weight ofthe'~~stdOO x 200 mm) equals to:
,.. ~
Post
Secondary beam
h =f -t ridge -clearance=i.~'-:-Q.3"::'0'.3=1.9m
A 2 Xt
15=--
11.42 xO.2 '. rom
2000 2000 = 0.013 m < 0.02m ~.~ ..~.~.~.~..~.~.~>~.,~,~,~,.~.~.~..~.~.~,.
,,-<"" c,,""" -c,,"""""" «"" «" c,,·
:
_--'----!J,
- .«~«~«««««« <~<~« «««<.
~
0(" 0(
I
M add = Pu xt5 = 61.92xO.02:== 1.23kN.m I
I
6
P" = 61.92xl000 = 0 044 Mu = 1.23 x 10 = 0.004
feu xb xt 35x 200 x 200 . , feu xb Xt 2 35x 200 x 200 2
The point is below the interaction diagram, use A smin .
f.J = 0.25 + 0.052 x A = 0.84%
Frame
reaction
from post
..... ..... ..... reaction from
200 66.92 66.92
Frame
'g
To simplify the caIculati0ns of the bending moment, the concentrated loads on
the frame caRbe replaceq into uniform load fis follows: . Equivalent loading system
106 107
Step 6.3: Calculation of straining actions =H = wu XL2 = 58.29x202 =186.44kN
The frame is two-hinged and is once statiCally indeterminate. The horizontal Ha b 4xhxN 4x6.7x4.666
reaction at the base for uniformly loaded frame is given by
The vertical reaction can be easily obtained as follows:
XL2
H =H = wu
a b 4xhxN y = Wu xL + 0.6x Pu = 58.29x 20 + 66.92 = 649.81 leN
I h . a 2 2
where K =2.x- and N = 2K +3
Ie L The moment at top of the column Mcol
The moment of inertia for the column is calculated using tavg = Ha x h avg = 186.44 x 6.7=1249.15 kN
3 The maximum moment at mid span of the frame can be obtained as follows:
I = b xt!g = 0.350 x 1.033 =0.0322m4
e 12 12
M _ wu XL2
3 3 mid - 8 Meol
I = bxt = 0.35x1.4 0.08 m 4
b 12 12 2
M _58.29x20 1249.15=1665.3kN.m
mid - 8
K = !.!..x!!:.. = 0.08 x 6.7 = 0.833
The bending moment, shear force, and normal force diagrams for the frame are
Ie L 0.0322 20
presented in the next page.
N = 2K +3 = 2xO.833+3 = 4.666
Step 6.4: Design of frame sections
66.92 66.92
wu=58.29 kN/m' The critical sections are shown in the figure below.
1 2
3 _-+_3
XL2
Ha = wu
4xhxN 1 2
a
.. .. b
..
L=20
108
109
66.92 66.92
t ..L _, , ,, ,,t
wu=58 29 leN/m'
,
Step 6.4.1: Design of section 1 (350 mm x 1400 mm)
-r-- Section 1 is a rectangular section that is subjected to the following factored
actions:
t'-.. Reactions
lei Mu=1665.3 kN.m
186.44 Pu=186.44 kN (compression)
a b
~~ 186.44
".0..
According to the ECP 203; if (PuI!cu b t) is less than 0.04, the nonnal force can
649.81 20 be neglected.
649.81
Pu 186.44 x 1000
-~- = = 0.0108 < 0.04 ........ neglect the nonnal force
feu xbxt 35x350x1400
The design will be carried out as if the section is subjected to bending only.
Frames are usually heavily reinforced and the reinforcing bars are arranged in
1249.15 \:;-'~~--r-rrl~,..--.,.aJ+----, 1249;15
two rows. Therefore, the effective depth is given by:
d = t -100mm = 1400 -100 = 1300 mm
Bending moment To use the R-ffi, calculateR
diagram 6
R= Mu = 1665.3x10 =0.0804
feu xbxd 2 35x350x1300 2
, From the chart with R=0.0804, the reinforcement index (J)= 0.1028
•
Nonnal force f 35
diagram As = {J)x--E!...xbxd = 0.1028x-x350x1300 = 4546 mm 2
fy 360
Shearing force
diagram .
Use 10<p25 (4908 mm2)
110
111
Step 6.4.2: Design of section 2 (350 mm x 1400 mm) Buckling in the in-plane direction
Section 2 is a rectangular section that is subjected to the following factored The frame is considered unbraced because the lack of any bracing system. The
actions:
effective length factor k can be obtained from the ECP 203. The top part of the
Mu= 1249.15 kN.m Pu=186.44 kN (compression) column is considered case (1) and the bottom part is considered case (3)
According to the ECP 203; if (Pu/leu b t) is less than 0.04, the normal force can (hinged base). Thus, k=1.6.
be neglected.
The height of the column is measured from the bottom of the beam to the base
Pu 186.44xlO00 (h *). However, it is customary to use the length used in the analysis h.
feu xbxt = 35x350x1400 = 0.0108 < 0.04 ........ neglect normal force
He = kxh = 1.6x6.7 = 10.72 m
The design is carried out as if the section is subjected to bending only. The slenderness ratio A is calculated using the average column thickness not
To use the R-ro, calculate R the actual one, thus A equals
6
1249.15x10 = 0.0603 ..1= He = 10.72 =10.37
35x350x1300 2 tavg 1.033
Since A is greater than 10, the column. is considered long and additional
From the chart with R = 0.0603, the reinforcement index OJ= 0.075 moment is developed.
fcu 2 2
As =OJx xbxd=0.075x 35 x350x1300=331Omm 2 15 = ..1 xtavg = 10.37 x 1.033 = 0.0556 m -7 (t5av = 15)
fy ' 360
2000 2000
112 113
Assuming that the distance from the concrete to the c.g. of the reinforcement is
Step 7: Design for shear
80 mm. Thus the factor C; equals
The critical section for shear is at dl2 from the face of the column. Thus the
(; = t-2xcover = 1200-2x80 =0.86 design force Qu equals to:
t 1200
Using interaction diagram with/y=360 N/mm2, a.=0.6 and S=0.8 (conservative) Qu =Y a -Pedge -w u (2.+ d) = 649.81-66.92-58.29X(1.2 +.!.2) = 510.02 kN
2 2 -2 2
p=2.1
=~= 51O.02x1000 =1.12 N/mm 2
J1. = pxfcu x1O-4 = 2.1x35x1O-4 = 0.00735 qu bxd 350x1300
2
As = J1.xb xt = 0.00735x350x1200 = 3087 mm 2 (7<P25, 3436 mm )
Critical section
A; =a·As =0.6x3087=1852mm 2 (4<P25, 1963 mm2)
2 0.6 Pu==66.92
AS.lolal =A; +As =3436+1963 = 4939mm
Since the column is long the minimum reinforcement ratio is given by:
J1.min = 0.25 + 0.052 A, = 0.25 + 0.052 x 10.37 = 0.789 , use J.l.min=0.008
1
2
t2==1.20 /--1 ,
As.min = 0.008xbxt = 0.008x350x1200 = 3360 mm < As.lol ...... ·o.k _._.- -'-','-' -'-'-' -1-·-·_·- ._._._._. -'-'-'-i'-'-
l I _1.....-_
1
Pu == 1000 (0.35X35x(350x700) + 0.67x360xI960) == 3474kN > (649.8} ..... o.k
footing
2
Use 9<P25, 4415 mm >Asmin
4<1>12 Ya==649.81
~ [] 1 The presence of the compression force increases the shear capacity of the
beam, however, this force is relatively small that its effect can be neglected
(conservative)
I· 700mm
·1 qcu =0.24~fcu
1.5
=0.24~35
1.5
=1.15 Nlmm 2
114 115
5~25
~
~~25
Since qu < qcu, provide minimum amount of stirrups.
~ LI 4~25
,
Q
3 7f9l25 wi
Assume that stirrups spacing is 200 mm IllJIlH+I*
I WillJI II
A 0.4 0.4 2
:'I,min =-xbxs =-x350x200=117 mm
i y 240
4~25 ull
Ast,min is the area of two branches. For one branch, Ast=58 mm2 (<1>10=78.5 1400 300
mm2) CI.l 1 1 1 .
Choose <I> 1O@ 200 mm (5<1>1O/m') ; I!II~ ]~]g
J I\)
.~ ~
>-' ~ I\) I\)
e '§: '§:
'§: ~ ~
I\) I\) I\) I\) I\)
01
~
(D
~
Q
S· 3
.,Cl'
n I--
(D
S
(D
1400 300 ~
=
...... CI.l
I 1 I
I\)
I!I~ lJ]g
t:::1 CD 18
(D
..... ~
II' tv 101 I\)
~/.N~
I
== tv
t
fI> I\)
01
0
..... '§: '§:
......
.....
~~
~
=-
I\)
01
~
I\)
-L
I\)
-'-
I\)
......
I\)
I\)
01
- -
(D
.,
~
<11
"§: a
'§:
01 01
II' Q I\)
01
S 3 I-
(D
I ~
I I 01
"§:
Q
3
I\)
a
7¢P25
~ ~
r- I- ~
2¢P12
CI.l
CD
[~ h
I- 2¢P12
~ ~
w I\)
e
~
I
w l- e ~ 2¢P12
'-- ~ ~ Q
3
'--- ~ 4</P25
~ -
I\)
-
I\)
116
Example 1. 8: Frame with north direction parallel to the span
The figure given below shows the general layout of a factory covered by a
structural system that permits indirect lighting. The main structural system of
the workshop is reinforced concrete frames. It is required to carry out a
complete design of the roof of such a system together with the frame.
The material properties arefcu=30 N/mm2,h=400 N/mn'J? andhsF280 N/mm2
'------iN
Ii:
,...----t N
.,...
N
119
118
Solution
Step 1: Propose the concrete dimensions N~
Since the north is parallel to the span, a system of frames with Y-beams is
'chosen. cp ~B ~i ~i ~i
Assume the following dimensions
t5
Ridge beam
= 100 mm
= (200 mm x550 mm)
-r---
-
i .
-@
bg =350 mm
Span =20m
tg = span/(12--+ 14) = 1.6 m
E
---
-- V-beam
®
--@
--fA
tcol,top=(O.8 tg--+tg) = 1.4 m 0
Il'i
C\I ~ 200/(300x800)
-
Il'i E
Spacing between frames = 5.0 m ~ ID
C\i
(350x1600)
--@
is given by
gs = ts x25 + flooring = O.lx 25 + 1.0 =3.5 kN 1m 2
Assuming that the live load is equal to 0.5 kN/m2 , the ultimate load Wsu is given
r--®
by --J-B
~I
4x5.0=20.0 m
wsu =1.4xg s +1.6xps =1.4x3.5+1.6x.5=5.7 kNlm 2 1--
Plan
Fig. Ex 1.8a Structural system (plan)
120 121
The roof is a system of one-way slabs that are continuous in the short direction.
Thus, the maximum moment can be obtained as shown in the following figure.
Slab (100mm)
w=5.7 kNlm' ,
3.56 kN.m
Section A-A 2 2
M = w.u xL =5.7x2.5 =3.56kN.m
u 10 10
Assuming 20 mm cover, the effective depth d = 100 - 20 = 80 mm
Taking a strip of 1.0 m width and using R-ro curve, the value of R is given by:
Ridge beam Slab (100mm) Sec. beam
'"
200x550 " ' " 200x500 \ 6
R= Mu = 3.56x10 =0.0185
'--- 2
leu xbxd 30x 1000 x 80 2
I
r From the chart with R=0.0185, the reinforcement index (J)= 0.022
~. I· ~ 2
I V-beam /
200/(300x800}
200x200
Frame girder./'
350x1600 ,....E
As =(J)x~xbxd
Iy
=0.022x-x1000x80=132 mm 1m
400 .
N
0.15
I Wall beam E
U)
2
As,min =--x1000x80= 120mm 1m <As ... o.k
ci 100
250x500
E
<Xl
N Choose 5ct>8/m'(250 mm2)
122 123
16t s +b {16XlOO + 200 =1800 mm
L 5590
B=thesmallerof -7 +b = -5-+ 200 =1318mm
{ 5
CL -7 CL 2500 mm
B=1318 mm
Using C-J curve, and assuming a < ts
Cl=d/~
6
Mu =4501 62.01x10 =11.36
feu xB 30x1318
~=49.61
on post The point is located outside the curve, thus cld)min=0.125 and j=0.825
a = 0.8xc = 0.8xO.125x450 = 45 mm
Since a < ts (100 mm), the assumption is valid.
6
A = Mu = 62.01x10 =417.6 mm 2
s fy xJxd 400xO.825x450
~
R wuxL' 17.75x5.59 oo . ~:~';".,..:..,
... .;"'. ~~:
I
I
=-2- 2 =49.61 kN
~ T ml; '.::.-..:
b
The section at midspan is aT-section and the effective width B is taken as: :;/'>
0 ••
:I
124 125
Wu = W u•o.w + Wu X cantilever length = 3.85 + 5.7xO.25 = 5.275kN I m' T-----
I
Step 5: Design of the post (200 mm x 200 mm)
IfI11:.5 1 If' 11 Ii
wu=5.275 kNlm I The factored self weight of the post (200 mm x 200 mm) equals to:
11 \
Pow = l.4x25xb xt xh = 1.4x25xO.2xO.2x2.5 = 3.5 kN
1-1-- 2.5 The post supports loads from the ridge beam and from. the secondary beam.
Pu = po.w + ~ (secandrybeam) + Pr (ridge beam)
126 127
'M$.!!""""·
"j
Step 6: Design of the V-beam (200/300 mm x 800 mm) The loads on the Y-beam result from the secondary beam and fro the post
Step 6.1: Loads and straining actions every 2.5 m, causing concentrated loads at these locations
The cross-section of the Y-beam is shown below. The effective cross-section of Pu =66.3+49.61=115.91 kN
the beam can be taken as (300 mm x 500 mm) or (200 mm x 800 mm). The last
choice is more economical because it permits larger depth. Post
Lateral torsional buckling of the compression flange might occur because the
upper part of the beam is not connected to the slab (part A). To avoid that, the
Secondary
ECP 203 requires that the unsupported length between the inflection points be
beam
less than
Y-beam
Secondary beam
The Y-beam is a continuous beam having more than three equal spans. The
, reactions and the bending moments can be determined using a computer
program or a simplified analysis. Using the simplified analysis, the bending
moments can be computed as the superposition of the bending moments due to
the concentrated loads and those due the uniform loads. Theses values can be
obtained in text books of structural analysis.
The value of the bending moment at the support due to the concentrated load is
The factored self-weight equals to (Pu x L 16.22), wh\le that at mid-span is (Pu x L 15.89)~ On the other hand the
wu,o.w = 1.4x Yc x (b1 xt1 + b2 xt2 ) values of the bendmg moments due to uniform loads at the support and at mid-
span are wL2/IO and WL2/12, respectively.
wu,o.w =1.4x2S(0.2xO.80+0.lOx0.50) =7.35 kN 1m'
2 2
M =,wu xL + Pu xL = 7.35x5 + 115.91x5 =111.55 kN.m
b(-ve) 10 6.22 10 6.22
128
129
2 2
M = Wu xL + Pu xL = 7.35x5 + 115.91x5 = 113.71 kN.m 0.225.JJ:: b d = 0.225.J30 x200x750:::; 462 mm 2
a(+ve) 12 5.89 12 5.89 Iy 400
1.3A s = 1.3 x 454 = 590 mm 2
The maximum reaction at any interior support due to the concentrated loads
Use4<I>14 (615 mm 2)
and due to the uniform loads are equal to (2.15 Pu x L) and (1.1 Wu xL),
respectively. Since the bending moment at section 2 is very close to that of section 1, the
same reinforcement is used.
Ry = 1.1xwu xL+ 2.15xPu = l.1x7.35x5 + 2.15x115.91 = 289.64 kN
t t t t t wu=7.35 kNlm /1
l' I
a '17t I I I ,17' I I I ! i The shear on the Y-beam can be calculated as follows:
A
1
I
M.ve=1l1.55 kN.m
131
130
Step 7: Design of the frame (350 mm x 1600 mm)
-
Step 7.2: Calculation of the straining actions
Step 7.1: Dimensioning The frame is two-hinged and is once statically indeterminate. The horizontal
reaction at the base can be estimated by:
From step 1, the dimensions of the frame girder are 350 mm x 1600 mm.
The thickness of the column at the top is taken as (0.8-1 tg) and at the bottom as uniform load
(0.4-0.6 tg). ,Thus, the thickness of the column at the top is taken equal to 1400
concentrated load
mm and at the bottom is taken equal to SOO mm. The own weight of the frame
equals to: where
The frame carries its own weight and the reaction of the Y-beam. The
concentrated loads are equal to the reactions of the Y-beam (289.64 kN). At the N=2K+3
edges the reaction can be estimated as 0.6 R y =173.78 kN. The height of the The moment of inertia for the column is calculated using tave
frame leg h is measured from the footing to the centerline of the girder. bXt!g 3
1=-- 0.350x1.2 = 0.0504m4
e 12 12
h = clear height +!.L + hi = 5 + 1.6 + 1.0 = 6.S0m 3 3
- 2 2 I = bxt = 0.35x1.6 =0.119
The frame column has a variable moment of inertia. To simplify the b 12 12
calculations, an average column thickness measured at 2/3h is used.
2 2 K = ~x!!: = 0.119 x 6.S = 0.806
tavg =tl +-(t2 -t l ) = O.S +-(1.4-0.8) = 1.2 m Ie L 0.0504 20
3 3
N =2K +3= 2xO.806+3 =4.61
-,- _
I
---~- t.--t.lVg=1.2
Ib . al=5•I b l=15
I
00
I a ~.I \ci
I
• <r) Ie II
I
I ..s:: II ..s:: Ie
wu XL2
J
I
I
I
I
Ha Ha=I 3xp" x(aixb)
I
a 4xhxN
- Hb b a _ 2xhxLxN lIb b
co
Reactions
-\Q
M 101·d = 19.6x202
8 + 289.64x20
4 + 289.64x5-1602.6 = 2273.81 kN.m
Normal force
The bending moment, the shear force, and the normal force diagrams for the
frame are given in figure below. diagram
630.46 r -___ .
+
Shearing force
I diagram
134 135
Step 7.3: Design of the frame sections 235.67 X 1000
- - - - - = 0.014 < 0.04 ........ neglect the normal force
feu xbxt 30x350xl600
Step 7.3.1: Design of section 1 (350 mm x 1600 mm)
The design will be carried out as if the section is subjected to bending only.
Section 1 is a rectangular section that is subjected to 6
R= Mu = 1602.57 X 10 = 0.067
Mu=2273.81 kN.m & Pu=235.67 kN feu xbxd 2 30x350x1500 2
If (P,1!cu b t ) is less than 0.04, the normal force can be neglected. From the chart with R=0.067, the reinforcement index (0::0.085
Pu 235.67 x 1000 f· ~ 2
A = {()x----E!!.xbxd = 0.085x-x350xI500 = 3346 mm
feu xbxt = 30x350x1600 = 0.014 < 0.04 ........ neglect the normal force s fy 400
The design will be carried out as if the section is subjected to bending only. 0.225.Ji: b d = 0.225$0 x350x1500=1617 mm 2
Since frames are usually heavily reinforced, the bars are usually arranged in at As min =the smaller of fy 400
{
least two rows. -7 d = t -100 = 1600 -100= 1500 mm 1.3As = 1.3 x 3346 = 4350 mm 2
2273.81x10 6
---~.---:- = 0.096 Use 8<1>25 (3926 mm2) , see reinforcement details
30x350x1500 2
From the chart with R =0.096, the reinforcement index {()= 0.126
Step 7.3.3: Design of section 3 (350 mm x 1400 mm)
As = {()X feu xbxd =0.126x 30 x350x1500 = 4961 mm 2
fy 400 Buckling in the out-of-plane direction
The frame is considered unbraced in the out-of-plane direction because of the
0.225J.i:: b d = 0.225$0 X 350 X 1500 =1617 mm 2
lack of any bracing system.
fy 400
From Fig. Ex. 1.8b, it can be determined Ho=2.8. The effective length factor k
1.3As = 1.3x4961 = 6449 mm 2 is obtained with case (I) at top and bottom. Thus, k=1.2.
He =kxH o =1.2x2.8=3.36m
Use 9<1>28 (5541 mm2)
H 3.36
A =_e = - - =9.6 < 10 (case of unbraced columns)
The stirrup hangers are taken as 15% of As , which gives 831 mm2 (3<1>20). b 0.35
The shrinkage bars should not be less than 8% from As with a maximum Thus, no additional moments are induced in the out-of-plane direction.
distance between bars of 300 mm. This gives 443 mm2 (8<1> 12)
Buckling in the in-plane direction
The frame is considered unbraced because the lack of any bracing system. The
Step 7.3.2: Design of section 2 (350 mm x 1600 mm)
top part of the column is considered case (1) and the bottom part is considered
Section 2 is a rectangular that is subjected to case (3) (hinged base). Thus k=1.6.
Mu= 1602.57 kN.m & Pu=235.67 kN The height of the column is measured from the bottom of the beam to the base
If (Puffeu b t) is less than 0.04, the normal force can be neglected. (h *). However, it is customary to use the length used in the analysis h.
136 137
He =kxh = 1.6x6.8 =10.88 m
TI Step 7.3.4: De~ign of section 4 (350 mm x 800 mm)
The slenderness ratio A is calculated using an average column thickness not the This section is subjected to a pure compression force (PIl=804.24 kN) and can
actual one, thus A equals be reinforced with the minimum area of steel.
moment is developed. p = _1_ (0.35 X 30 X (350 X 800) + 0.67 X 400 X 2240) = 3540 kN > (804.24) ... .o.k
u 1000
M=1602.57 kN.m & Pu=804.24 kN
From the frame reinforcement details As=8cI>25, 3927 mm2 > As,min
Due to the fact that column sections are subjected to large normal force, it is
recommended to use compression steel between 40%-60% of the tension steel 4<1>12
to ensure ductile behavior. Use the interaction diagram (a=0.6).
~1
'?:
Pu = 804.24x1000 =0.0547
feu xbxt 30x350x1400
l. c.
6
• • •
Mu = 1602.57 X 10 = 0.077
feu xbxt 2 30x350x1400
2
800 rnrn
Assuming that the distance from the concrete to the c.g. of the reinforcement is
80 mm; Thus the factor I;: equals
I· -I
{; = t -2xcover = 1400-2x80 =0.89
t 1400 Step 8: DeSign for shear
Using a interaction diagram with fF 400 N/mm2, a=0.6, and 1;:=0.9 --7
The critical section for shear is at d/2 from the face of the column. Thus the
p=1.9 design force Qu equals to:
Jl = px feu X 10-4 = 1.9x30x1O-4 = 0.0057
Qu =ya
-0.6P
u
-w u(!2+~)=804.24-173'78-19,6(1.4+~)=602,04kN
22 22
2
As = Jlxbxt = 0.0057x350x1400 = 2793 mm 2 (8cI>25, 3926 mm )
2
A; = a· As = 0.6 x 2793 = 1676 mm 2 (4cI>25, 1963 mm ) =~ = 602.04x1000 = 1.147 N/mm 2
2
qu bxd 350x1500
AS.lolal = A; + As = 3926 + 1963 = 5889 mm
The presence of the compression force increases the shear capacity of the
Since the column is short, the minimum reinforcement ratio is 0.008.
girder. however, this fprce is relatively small and can be !leglected
A s.min = 0.008xbxt = 0.008x350x1400 = 3920 mm 2 < As.lol .......o.k (conservative),
l38 l39
1(")
Critical section
::II
0.6 PU=173.78j f:r shear
1 w u-19.6 i 1(") ~
:0-
fl I I aJ J J I I r-r-,
10
tOs&I .----
- 0 - - - -.-.- _._._._._._.-I-._._._._._._._.-L.- SZ¢P8 ~
I i i
1.4 -
I
I --- i u¢Pz ~ I-
1
r- ... ('f')
r
I
1---d/2 GJ¢PZ I
~ L0
I ('f')
I
I
w/O~¢S U
z~¢PG Jo--
I (\)
I CZl
I
I
I
z~¢Pz ~ f--
I
I
sz¢Pv III:........ IL-
I
~
:e.
co 0
E Q)
!3
(II
0 co co
{}.
co .:::
Ii -..-
C\I
C\I
- Q)
Ya=804.24
=§,
C') t ..- 10
C\I
=§,
C\I
..-
=§,
C\I
..-
=§,
C\I
..-
=§,
C\I
..-
=§,
co
C\I
=§, ....-=.....
0
co C\I C\I C\I C\I 10 M
'"
m
I
==
qcu = 0.24
H.i
-E!L
1.5
= 0.24 - o = 1.07 N I mm 2
1.5
(Neglect the effect of Pu) I~ jl]I M
U
Q)
VJ.
'C
(II
.....
Q)
.....
0 co
I 009~
I =
Q)
E oS
qsu = qu - qcu = 1.147 - 1.07 = 0.61 N I mm 2 0 .13
2 2 :e.co ~
co
101m' (Ast=2x78.5=157 mm2) (10 mm diameter is chosen because of the
0 C\I C\I C\I C\I
Try <I> C\I ..- ..- ..- ..- C\I
=§, ~ ~ =§, ~ =§,
I-' 1-'' '
heavy reinforcement of the frame) C') C\I C\I C\I C\I (J) .......
.......I
It ~~I]1 u
(\)
CZl
I-'
1-':'-
I 009~
I
0.61 157x280/1.15 -{\J -{\J
350xs gG~t
.- sz_v
gG~g
~
Astmm' = OA xbxs = 0.4 x350x166 = 83mm 2 <A t (157 mm2) .....o.k ,
' iy 280 ! SGfI't jJ :0-
~
gG~t
140 141
I 5¢8/m,
21P12 sl I 250 200
I 21P12 s1 21P12
I 0
.....
t!3
",11.
'> t'
Reinforcement details of ridge beam
~ 2\l'12 A
____
1 m 5¢8/m
~~~~~~,~
tt '>
."14
A ____
t
~
Sec.B -B
2stJS12 o
4~14__ .. _ .. _ , \ 4stJS14 o
LO
\ 2stJS14 /
2stJS14 2~14
, 2stJS14 , ,
. 2~14 , , 2stJS14
Elevation Sec. A-A
Reinforcement details ofY-beams
"~
.~
Post
g !lli11
LO
-1/
4~12
~~t~2Fil~
~~
~
post detail
Y-beam
1.7 Arched Slab Systems
1.7.1 Introduction
Arched slabs are commonly used to cover relatively large spans. The spans can
range from 12.0 ms to 25.0 ms. The forces developed in the arched slabs are
mainly compression combined with small amount of bending moments.
Therefore, such a structural system is a very efficient reinforced concrete
structure. The advantages of using arched slabs can be summarized as follows:
• Permits covering large areas free of columns.
• Leads to shortening the construction period. earn
• Allows economical use of the construction materials because concrete
mainly subject to compression.
144 145
Ii
"
ts(crown)
The arched slab acts as a one-way curved slab as shown in Fig. 1.20. The rise of
the arch f is determined as a ratio of the span L. The recommended rise/span
ratio is about 114 to 118. The main reinforcement is provided in the span
direction and the secondary reinforcement is provide in the longitudinal
direction. The amount of secondary reinforcement is usually 20%~25% of the
cross sectional area of the main steel.
Brick wall
.E
Column Horizontal beam
Wall beam Secondary
reinforcement direction
Span (L)
Vertical
beam
direction
(SEC. A - A)
2
L
A~~~==============================~
E
«S
Cf)
.2l
~o
N
.~
Fig. 1.20 A segment of the arched slab
I
B~-+I"================================~ The reaction of the arched slab at the support is inclined as shown in Fig. 1.21.
This inclined reaction can be analyzed in the vertical and horizontal directions.
Cf) Vertical beam It is customary to provide vertical and horizontal beams to resist these forces.
Tie
c~-+.~============================== ..
Column Fig. 1.21 Supportiug beams of ,
the arched slab.
D~-+.~=============================="
Arched slab
Reaction
Horizontal
Plan reaction
Fig. 1.19b Arched slab with a tie reaction
146 147
The vertical beam provides a support to the vertical component of the reaction 1.7.3 Structural Analysis of Arched Slabs
as shown in Fig. 1.22. It is analyzed as continuous beam supported on columns. Two types of arched slabs are commonly used; a) parabolic arched slab and b)
On the other hand, the horizontal beam provides a support to the horizontal circular arched slab. Parabolic arched slabs are more efficient systems because
component of the reaction. It is analyzed as continuous beam supported on the the centerline of the arch coincides with the line of pressure, resulting in zero
ties. If the tie is not provided, the horizontal beam will be directly supported on
columns. In such a case, the columns will be subjected to large concentrated bending moment.
forces at the top resulting in large bending moments. Two sections are usually considered when designing the arched slab, namely;
the section at the quarter point and the section at the support. The section at the
quarter point is subjected to both compression and bending moment, while the
section at the support is subjected to normal force (compression) only.
where
r isthe radius of the arch, and x and y are coordinates of any point on the arch ..
The radius of the arch may obtained using the rise of the arch / and the span L
Fig. 1.22 Vertical and horizontal beams of arched-slab system by observing the triangle mno as follows
r2 =(LI2)2+(r-fi .................................. (1.10)
f
n m
r-f
r y r
",o~'--_ _'" x
149
148
Section at the quarter point II
II I I II
The quarter point is subjected to a bending moment and a compression force.
The quarter point of the arch is obtained by bisecting the angle 9 to point 01 as
shown in Fig. 1.24. It is a well known geometric fact that the tangent slope (ex)
at point 0, must equal 9/2, thus
a=BI2 ............................................... (1.12)
..
HDL
H
.. WLL
II I I
L
o
b: Moments due to live load covering half of the slab
Fig. 1.24 Analysis of a circular arch at the quarter point 0 1
The critical load combination is the dead load covering the whole span and the
live load covering half of the span. Figure 1.25 shows the bending moment for \I I !
different load cases. I I I II
The values of both vertical and horizontal reactions due to dead and live loads
are given in Table 1.5.
" I I
(+
Table 1.5 Values of the reactions in circular arched slabs
Item Dead load covering the whole span Live load ~overing
H
half of the span ..
R, w DL xLI2 3W LL XLI8
L
R2 W DL xLI2 W LL XLI8
c: Moments due to combineddead and live loads
H 2
W DL xL /(8/) W LLXL2 /(16/) Fig. 1.25 Bending moments in circular arched slabs
151
150
= r sin (~)
For flat arches the nonnal force at the quarter point can be approximated by:
x .................................................. (1.17)
H
Pu =- - ................. ;............................ (1.13)
cos a
y=.Jr 2 -x 2 ................................................... (1.18)
However, the exact value of the compressive P u and shearing force Qu can be
obtained from simple structural analysis at point 01 as follows: Y1 == y-(r- f) .................: .............................. (1.19)
Pu = H cos a+Qsina ................................... (1.14)
XC ==L 12-x .................................................. (1.20)
Qu = Qcosa- H sin a ................................... (1.15) Carrying out the structural analysis, the moment at the quarter point 01 may be
obtained. For example, the negative mo~ent at the quarter point due to live
Where Hand Q are the horizontal and vertical forces, respectively, at the loads on half of the span equals to:
quarter point as shown in Fig. 1.26.
M<-ve)LL == R2LL -xc -HLL Y1 ........................... (1.21)
Referring to Fig. 1.24 and from triangle omn, one can get the following relation: Where
R2LL ==W LL xL 18
B=sin-1 LI2 .......................... ;................ (1.16) HLL ==W LL xL2/(16f)
r
Table 1.6 Values of the bending moments and the normal forces at the
Q quarter point of a circular arch.
152 153
M (-ve)DL = k 1 X W DL X L2 .................................. (1.22) 1.7.3.2 Parabolic Arched Slabs
The equation of the axis of the parabolic arch according to Fig. (1.28) is given
M (-ve)U = k 2 X WLL X L2 .................................. (1.23) by:
where
Pu = k4 xH ..................................................... (1.25)
f = the rise of the arch
L = the span of the arch -
Section at the Support
The section at the support is subjected to a normal force only. To obtain the
maximum forces (pU/,=), the whole span should be covered with both dead and
live loads as shown in Fig 1.27.
II I I I I I I I ! I I I II
R
max
Wu L
= - - .................................................. (1.27)
2
p. =H J1+e{ J. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1.31)
Pu,max = H max cos e + Rmax sin e ............................. (1.28) The exact value of the compression force can be obtained from simpl~
structural analysis as shown in Fig. 1.29 and is given by:
Noting that the angle of the tangent at the support equals e, one gets: Pu =H cos a+Qsina .................................. (1.32)
e = sin- (L 1
:2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1.29) Where Hand Q are the horizontal and vertical forces at the quarter point.
154 155
Q
Section at the Support
H ------~~~~- The section at the support is subjected to a nonnal force only. To obtain the
maximum forces (Pumax), the whole span should be covered with both dead and
live loads as shown in Fig. 1.30. .
H
II ! " ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! II
The values of both the vertical and the horizontal reactions due to dead and live
loads are given in Table 1.7 (Refer to Fig. 1.28).
H max =
W
-t- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L2
(1.34)
Table 1.7 values of the reactions in parabolic arches Rmax =w u L ........................................... (1.35)
2
Item Dead load covering the Live load covering half
pu •max = H max ,cos () + Rmax sin () ...................... (1.36)
span the span
RI w DL xLI2 3w LL xLI8 where e is the tangent angle at the support and can be obtained by
differentiating Eq. 1.30, and substituting with x=O.
R2 w DL xLI2 W LL xLI8 I 4f
y = tan(} = - ...................................... (1.37)
L
H 2
w DL xL 1(8f) W LL xe 1(16f) Alternatively, Pumax can be obtained by
Moment(M) 0 ±w LL xL 164
2
P",max =~ H!.x + R!..x ..................................... (1.38)
156 157
Example 1.9: Design of a Circular arched slab
20.0m
A machinery room spans 20 ms is shown in Fig. EX 1.9~ It is required to carry
out a complete design of the roof that is covered by a circular arched slab. The ,
clear height of the room is 6.4 ms and the height of the crown is 4.0 IllS. The @--
material properties are: /cu=30 N/mm2, fY =400 N/mm2, and fYst =240 N/mm2.
The weight of plastering and finishing materials may be assumed 0.60 kN/m 2 • -
The live load may be assumed 0.90 kN/m 2•
--
Solution
-E
E~~
~ E Horizontal Beam
Step 1: Propose the concrete dimensions cu
III
0
250 x 900 mm .
as x
Ie r--...
.9 0
1: ..,
The arched circular slab is the chosen as the main system with the following ~ (0)
dimensions: ®--- -
A A
Arched slab
t5 (midspan) = 100mm +-- Tie
-4
250x250 \
t5 (quarter point) = 125mm
._- -
t5 (edge) = 150mm E co
./
0 EO
:;]1'-
Vertical beam = (350 mm x 750 mm) cO OX
(0)
0
II ..,
(.)0
<0
Tie = (250 mm x 250 mm) @--- -
Hanger =(250 mm x 250 mm)
Columns =(250 mm x 700 m)
The spacing between the ties = 6.0 m
B -- -
®-
A --'-.
Plan
Fig. EX. 1.9a A Hall covered with an arched slab
158 159
OSLX09E
Step 2: Calculations of loads
In order to calculate the forces acting of the arched slab system it is necessary to
determine the radius of the arc. Referring to Eq. 1.11 anq triangle mno in the
figure below, one can get:
o 2 2
cO
E ..... r=( LI2i+f 10 +42 =14.5m
:::I X
15:5 2f 2x4
°N
From triangle mno the angle e equals
e =sm. -1 L 12
--=sm
r
. -1 -10
- = 4360
.
14.50
1
f;I;l k
~
,.Q
c:7\
E ~
~
0
ci
"I f;I;l n m
....bil
~
r-4
r
WOv·g
o
E
E
~
n
1- L
-I
Eo
r= alo
(1)<0
.a X
=0
allO
:;::"1
The self weight of the arched slab may be calculated using the thickness at the
quarter point (125 mm).
2
ow.=ycxtavg =25xO.125=3.125kN 1m
WO·v I-
160 161
20
The factored dead load is given by: R2 x20 = 5.75x20x-+1.44x1Ox5
. 2 R2 =61.1kN
2
WUDL = 1.4 (ow. + plaster weight) = 1.4x(3.125 +0.6) =5.21 kN 1m 20
RI x20 = 5.75x20x-+1.44xlOx15 RI =68.3 kN
The dead load calculated for the horizontal projection is given by: 2
L' 5 22.07 2 To obtain the horizontal thrust H, the moment is taken at the middle hinge as
WUDL =W UDL X-= .21x--=5.75 kN 1m (H.P.)
L 20 follows:
Noting that the live loads on curved surfaces are always given on the horizontal
projection, the slab factored live load (w VU) is given by: (5.75+ 1.44) x 202
2
2 =80.88 kN
WULL = 1.6xw LL = 1.6xO.9 = 1.44 kN 1m 8x4
2
The total factored load Wu = WUDL +w ULL = 5.75 + 1.44 == 7.2 kN 1m OR
H x4 = RI xlO-w u x1Ox5 = 68.3xlO-7.19xlOx5 -7 H=80.88 kN
Step 3: Design the arched slab critical sections
There are two critical sections; the first section is at the quarter point and the
second one is at the support. The point at mid-span is assumed to act as a hinge wuu=1.44 kNlm'
due to its reduced thickness. Taking 1m width of the slab, the acting loads are tJ J I J J I II I J I J
shown in the following figure. WUDL=5.75 kNlm'
Step 3.1: Section at the quarter point (t$= 125 mm) I II I I I I I I I I I III
Quarter point y Quarter point
Step 3.1.1: Straining actions
To obtain the maximum moment at the quarter point, only half of the arch is
covered by the live load.
..
\
\ 80.88
lO\lll
wULL=1.44 kNlm' RI=68.3 t--~--I---"------I
~5.38 x=5.38 R2=61.1
I I I I I I I I I I I I --~\~~--~~~~~~~~~~~
\
\
\
WUDL=5.75 kNlm' \
\
\
II J J I I I I I I II y
\
\
\
'-\ 8/2
\
\
163
162
:II~I
."
I! The horizontal distance from the center of the arch is given by: H= 80.88 kN, and
Q =61.1-5.75x4.615 =34.6 kN
r,!
=rsin(~)=14.5XSin(4~.6)=5.385m
1.11
>:~ x
1'i a=~= 43.6 =21.8°
2 2
Xc =LI2-x =10-5.385=4.615 m
Pu = 80.88 cos 21.8 + 34.6sin 21.8 = 87.94kN
The height of the arc (y I) at the quarter point equals to: Q' = 34.6 cos 21.8 - 80.88 sin 21.8 = 2.08 kN
y =.Jr2 - X 2 = .J14.52 - 5.38 2 = 13.46 m Q=34.6
YI = i - (r - j ) = 13.64 - (10.5) = 2.96 m
18.66kN.m Alternatively, the bending moment and the normal force may be obtained using
Table 1.6 as follows:
j 4
-=-=0.2
L 20
From the table withjlL=0.2, one can determine that,
k 1=-0.00384,k2=-0.01745, k3=0.01361, 14=1.0872
· 2 2
Bending moment diagram M (-ve)DL = kl XW UDL xL = -D.00384x5.75x20 =-8.84 kN.m
164 165
Step 3.1.2: Calculate the reinforcement
Step 3.2: Section at the support (t=150 mm)
The section at the quarter point is subjected to combined compression force and
bending moment. The thickness of the arch at this location is 125 mm. Step 3.2.1: Straining actions
3
_P_u_ = 87.99 X 10 = 0.023 < 0.04 . To obtain the maximum reaction at the support, the full arch is covered by the
feu b t 30x1000 x125 live and dead loads as shown in figure.
Thus the normal force can be neglected, and designed for moment only. Wu=WUDL+ WULL= 7.2 kNlm /
d =t., -Cover =125-20=105 mm I I I I I I I I I I I I1
R =
I
Mu
feu b d
2
= 18.8x10
6
30x1000 x105 2
=0.057
0) =0.07
"
L____________________ ~2~O~m~ __________________~
Rmax -
Equivalent load system and reactions
H= 90 kN.
Q = Rmax = 72 kN
Reinforcement details for the slab
Pu.max =90 cos 43.6 + 72 sin 43.6 = 114.8 kN
166
167
Step 3.2.3: Design for shear .
.
Accordmg to the ECP 203 , the slab shear strength is calculated usmg the
following relation:
,
qcu
=0.16~fcu
15
=0.16 (30 =0.715 N
~~,
Imm 2
Hmax=90kN
-Q' - 9.9xlOOO =0.07 N Imm 2 (verysafe)
qu - b xd -1000x130
As = 100
0.6 X1000 X150 = 900 mm 2 (top and bottom)
A.leachface =450 mm 2
Using the same reinforcement determined from the section at the quarter span
As,top=As,boF 5 cP 12/m'=565 m2 > (450 mm 2) Hmax=90 leN/m'
A IOlal = 2x565 =1130 mm 2 in the
tie
~
~-
168 169
Step 4.2: flexural design
The factored weight of the vertical and horizontal beams equals:
Sec. 1:
ow. = 1.4x25x (0.35xO.75 +0.25x0.55)/106 = 14 kN 1m'
W S2
The total factored load on the vertical beam equals: Mu = - - = 258 kN.m
12
Wu =Rmax+ ow =72+14=86kN 1m' 6
R = Mu = 258 X 10 = 0.05 0)=0.0613
In which Rmax is the vertical reaction obtained from the analysis of a strip of 1.0 1 I eu b d 2 30x350 x700 2
m width of the arched slab.
As = m leu b ~d =0.0613 30 x350x 700 = 1126 mm
2
Iy 400
IllOO~
w u =86 kNlm'
II Iii I I I III Choose 6 <I> 16 (As = 1206 mm2). The secondary reinforcement is chosen as at
least 0.1-0.2 As. Choose 2 <I> 12.
I S=6.0
'I S=6.0
I Sec. 2
W S2
Mu =--=309.6 kN.m
-24 -10 -12 10
~~ ___________~
____________
~ __-----k 6
R = Mu = 309.6 x 10 =0.06 0)=0.0746
+12 +16 I leu bd 2
30x 350 X 700
2
4
~Bending
129
309.6 258 Iy
Choose 5 <I> 20 (As = 1570 mm
400
2
)
170 171
I)
,I
I,
I Q ==k q
u
Wu c
L-w u ( -+-
22
d) 86 (250
==0.6x86x6.0---x - +700)
- ==268.75 kN
100022 _ M u == 270 X 10 = 0.05
6
__ (t) = 0.061
R - f cu b d 2 30 x 250 X 8502 .
=~== 268.7xlOoo =1.096N Imm2 f w 2
qu b xd 350 x 700 A = (J}--E!-b xd = 0.061-x250x 850 =972 mm
s fy 400
Since qu> qcu, shear reinforcement is needed. The secondary reinforcement is chosen as 0.1-0.2 As. Choose 2 <I> 12.
A 93.9
Thus, the area of one branch =--1L = - _ = 46.95 mm 2
2 2 ,.....
\0
172
173
Sec. 2: Qu =k q Wu L-wu
(
2"c) =0.6x90x6.0-90x (0.25)
-2- =312.75 kN
W S2 90x6 2
Mu =10 =l ( ) = 324 kN.m 312.75x1000 =1.47 N Imm 2
250x850
6
R = Mu = 324 X 10
= 0.074
I =0% (j)
feu b d 2 30 x 250 X 8502 •
qcu =0.24!tCU =0.24 (30 =1.07Nlmm
2
. 1.5 ~~
feu b
A S --O)f- X
d = 0 .074-x250x850=1180mm
30 2
Since qu> qcu, shear reinforcement is needed.
y 400
1.07 2
Step 5.2: Design for shear Assuming a spacing of 125 mm, the shear reinforcement area is given by:
The crit~ca! secti~n for sh~ar is at th.e face of the middle support because the A =qslI xbxs =0.935 x 250x125=140mm 2
support ~s ill tensIOn (the tie). The cntical section is at section (1) as shown in sl fy I Ys 240/1.15
figure wIth code coefficient of kq =0.6.
A· 140
Thus, the area of one branch =--E.- = - = 70 mm 2
Qu =k q Wu L -wu (%) Shear
2 2
Kq 2 Use ¢10@125mm ~ 8¢101 m '
Use 4> 10=78 mm
2
ASI min = 0.4 b xs = 0.4 X 250x125 = 39 mm <Ast ..... ok
. fy 240
V1
0
0
t- o Step 6: Design of the tension tie (250 mm x 250 mm)
J
N t-
V1 N
o
The tie is the main supporting element for the horizontal beam. The ECP 203
'ci
states the reaction for a continuous beam equals (1.1 WU S) as shown in the
II
":! figure below.
c::::. The self-weight of the tie results in a small value of the bending moment that
'ci
can be neglected due to fact that under its self weight the tie acts a continuous
~
beam supported by the hangers.
1 tn
"'ci"
175
174
loads Reactions Step 8: Design of the column (250 mm x 700 mm )
T
C)
\Ci
II
~
~
~.
II
0 ~
Q,l
~
Effect of Wind loads
From the figure, the height of the column Ho s given by:
CI) :l Q,l
;l
~ H 0 = 6.4 + 1.0 = 7.4 m
.
II \()
til .S
is 0 ~ '" Q,l
...
u The wind pressure is assumed as 0.7 kN/m 2 • The pressure on the walls equals
...... 0
\0 ,...; ~ I
(wind-ward side)
0 II Ww =cw xqw xspacing =0.8xO.7x6.0=3.36 kN 1m
E-<
C)
\Ci
II column
1
til
"<t · I column
'" r-:II vertlC
\()
..q-
0
• 0
~
~
\()
..q- .c: M asonry wall
\()-~
t-
o- '--
beaill
Z i
~
\()
\()
is
Step 7: Design of the hanger (250 mm x 250 mm) C'i
176 177
In order to determine the bending moments in the columns due to wind load, an Effect of vertical loads
exact analysis could be carried out. In such an analysis, the arched slab is
assumed to act as a rigid link member connecting the columns as shown in the The vertical loads on the column are the summation of the following
figure. The shown system is analyzed under the" effect of the wind load and the 1. Self-weight =1.4xyc xbxtxh =1.4x25xO.25xO.7x7.4=45.3 kN
bending moments in the columns are obtained.
2. Weight of wall beam
As a conservative approximation, the bending moment in the column could be
obtained by considering the case of a cantilever column subjected to uniform = 1.4 x Yc xb xt xspocing = 1.4x25xO.25xO.6x6.0 = 31.5 kN
wind load.
3. Wall load = 1.4 x Yw xb xS x (h "":'tIVaJlbeam -tvelticaJ bemn)
I'
- - - - - - - - L=20 ---------..·-11 Pu = 45.3 + 31.5 + 228.7 + 567.6 = 873.1 kN
wu=86kNlm'
! I I
0.45
I ~J I
I0.60~O.50 I ~I I
0.50.50 I~
a 92kN.m
1
R=0.45 WU L
1
R=1.1 WU L R=1.0wu L
1
The moment of a cantilever member subjected to uniform load is given by: 6.0 . j. 6.0 .j
M "_ w IV xh
2
3.36x7.42 =92kN.m Statical system and loads on the vertical beam
wind - 2
2
The ultimate load case is given by: However the ultimate vertical load should by reduced as stated by the code as
Mu =0.8 (1.4xM DL +1.6xM LL +1.6 M wind ) follows:
Since MDL and MLL are equal to zero Pu =0.8 (1.4xPDL + 1.6 X PLi.. +1.6 Pwind )
178 179
Step 8.2: Calculation of the reinforcement
- It is clear from the previous table that the column is subjected to biaxial
bending.
The column is considered unbraced in both directions because there is no lateral
resisting system. The unsupported length in the X-direction is 7.4 ms and the Since M ~ (1877)
. > M : (24.6) .. I than Yd'
. ,X-direction is more cnhca .
- lrectlOn
unsupported length in the V-direction is 3.5 ms. The calculations of the a (0.65) b (0.20)
additional moments can be summarized in the following table. The load level Rb equals to:
Mu(wind) 117.8 0
f1.min = 0.25+0.052 A = 0.25 +0.052xI6.91 =1.13%
2
M101al- Mu+ Madd 187.7 24.6
As,min
=rmlD
II . xb XI = 1.13 x 250x700 = 1976 mm
100
Choose (12 <1>16, 2412 mm2) distributed uniformly.
~Mwind ~117.8
24.6~69.9
1 !
( 0.25 -t-·_·t·_·-t·_·_·_·-x
T '"0.70 "'
181
180
~~~~nJ
~j 1:\"/..'6~~
I 250 I
Sec. C-C
......
00 01 i0
i ~~~~MJ
~j
N 59S8/m C\I C\I
c c I 250 I
5¢8/m
CD Sec. B-B
09S8/m CD
6S11S16
3s?lS18
3s?lS18
350
A 1 1 I A
(01 (01 , (0
~ ~ = ~ L.....: I 2s?lS18
2s?lS18
""" C\I C\I",," 3s?lS18
700
C 3gl:S18
10¢8/m 10¢8/m
n
N
.·11 ~I I .~
~
~ 311616
6000
211612
I..... I",
511620
C,l,m" "",700
2*12
o
~~ 10~8/m
~
1-1 I l-
I I TIE 250x250
-.." t
6000 1-10 11\)]
IT IT
[2~16
[5~16""12 5418 ""12 I 350
Sec. 2-2
I
1
2
properties are/cu=25 N/mm2, and/y=360 N/rom , and /Yst=280 N/mm2. Neglect
the effect of wind on the design of the columns. The building may be assumed
as unbraced in the in-plane direction ami braced in the out-of-plane direction.
Data
2
D.L. =1 N/m (not including own weight)
L.L. = 0.5 N/m2 C:~~
mm ~
en
0
Clear height= 5.0 m 3
Solution TiL-
V200x200
Step 1: Propose the concrete dimensions
The parabolic arched slab is the chosen main system with the following Column
dimensions: V250x60 2
ts (mid-span) = 100mm A " Horizontal Beam
200 x 750mm
ts (quarter point) = 120 rom
ts (edge) = 140 rom Plan
184 185
16
The self-weight of the arched slab may be calculated using the thickness at the R2 x16 =6.16x16x-+0.80x8x4 R2 =50.88 kN
quarter point (120 mm). 2
ow.=ycXtavg =25xO.120=3.0kN 1m 2 16
Rl x16 = 6.16x16x-+0.80x16x12 Rl =54.08 kN
2
The total factored dead load including plaster weight wuDLis given by:
To obtain the horizontal thrust H, the moment is taken at the middle hinge as
WUDL =1.4 (ow. +plasterweight)=1.4x(3.0+1.0)=5.60kN 1m 2 follows:
The value of he horizontal projection (H.P.) of this load is given by: (W + WULL )XL2 (6.16+ 0.8)X16 2
L' 17.6 2
H = UDL 2 = _ _ _=2___ = 87.46 kN
WUDL =1. 4 w DL x-=5.60x--=6.16 kN 1m (H.P.) , 8f 8x2.4
L 16
The same result can be obtained by taking moment of forces at the crown.
Noting that the live loads on inclined surfaces are always taken on the
horizontal projection, the slab factored live load wuuis given by: H x2.4 = Rl x8-w u x8x4 = 54.08x8-6.96x8x4 ~ H=87.46kN
2
W ULL = 1.6xw LL = 1.6xO.5 = 0.80 kN 1m
The total factored load Wu =w UDL + W ULL = 6.16 + 0.80 = 6.96 kN 1m 2 (H.P.) Wuu= 0.80 kNlm'
I J J I J I ! I I I I I
Step 3: Design the arched slab critical sections
wUDL=6.16 kNlm'
Taking 1m width of the slab, the acting loads are shown in the following figure. II I ! ! I I I I I I I II
Quarter point
Step 3.1: Section at the quarter points (t= 120 mm)
186 187
26.24 kN WULL= 0.80 kNlm'
Also, it can be obtained directly from Table 1.7.
2 2 Pu
M =+W ULL xL = + 0.8x16 ±3.2kN.m a=16.7
u - 64 64 87.46
The maximum positive moment at 02 equals
Mu =R 1 x4-(W UDL +wuLL)x4x2.0-H XY2
H
Mu = 54.08x4-6.96x4x2.0-87.46x1.8 = 3.2 kN.m
4.0
3.2kN.m R
02 sc<::-~--()
~01- The section is subjected to compression and bending moment. The thickness of
~ 3.2 the arch at this location is 120 mm.
~=
3
At point 01, the corresponding normal and shear forces can be obtained as: Thus the normal force can be neglected, design for moment only.
fy 360
Q =50.88-6.16x4 = 26.24 kN
A . =0.6bd=0.61000X100=166mm2·
To obtain the tangent angle at the quarter point, the equation of the parabola is snun fy 360
differentiated as follows:
Choose 6 <II 101m' (As = 471 ~2)
_ 4-1·x ·(L-x) 4x2.4.x (16-x)
Y - L2 = 162 =0.0375 Due to the fact that half of the arched slab is subjected to negative moment and
the other half is subjected to positive moment, the main reinforcement (6 <II
Y' = tan a= 0.0375 (16-2x) 101m' ) is provided at the top and bottom. The secondary reinforcement is
chosen as at least 0.2 As. Choose 5 <II 81m'. The reinforcement is arranged
Substituting with x=4 tan a=0.30 a=16.7
staggered to avoid congestion of reinforcement.
Pu = 87.46 cos 16.7 + 26.24 sin 16.7 = 91.31 kN
189
188
5 <f> 81m'
y' = tan a = 0.0375 (16-2x)
6 <f> 10 1m' Substituting with x=O tan a=0.60 a=30.96
The corresponding normal force and shear at this section can be obtained as:
. Pu = H cos a+Qsina
....Hmax
16m
Rmax=55.68 kN
Equivalent load system and reactions
Step 3.2.2: Design the reinforcement
The section is SUbjected to pure compression (Pu =108.22 kN) and (Mu =0).
16
RrruJX = 6. 96X T = 55.68kN Assume that the total minimum area of steel of equals to 0.6%.
0.6 2
HrruJX x2.4=55.68x8-6.96x8x4 -7 As = 100 x 1000 x 140 = 840 mm (top and bottom)
Hmax =92.8 kN
di~Of'"leren
ObtaIt·.n thd t~gent angle at the support, the equation of the parabola is
2
e As/each/ace =420mm
late as lollows:
Using the same reinforcement determined from the section at the quarter span
y = 0.0375 (16 x ~x 2) As,top=As,bot= 6 <P 1O/m'=471 m2 > (420 mm
2
).
190
191
A lotal =2x471=942mm 2 The factored weight of the vertical and horizontal beam equals to:
p" =0.35 feu Ae +0.67xfyXAs ow. =1.4 x 25x (0.25xO.6 + 0.20xO.5) = 8.75 kN 1m'
Pu = (0.35 x25xI40x1000+0.67x360x942)/l000 = 1452 kN The total factored load on the beam equals to:
Since the applied compression force is less than the section capacity, the section
is considered adequate. W u =R max +ow =55.68+8.75=64.43kN 1m'
JS,.
+12
:A +16
:A
100.7
134.2
tie
Critical
sections
Sec. 1
=_w_S_2 = 64.43 X 52 = 134.23 kN.m
~
12 12
6
R = Mu = 134.23 X 10 = 0.071 (J) =0.089
750 1 feu b d 2 25x250 x550 2
192 193
feu 0.98
As =m b xd =0.089 25 x250x550=850mm 2 qsu =1.22---=0.73 N Imm
2
fy 360 2
Choose 5 <I> 16 (As = 1005 mm2) A = qsu xbxs
The secondary reinforcement is chosen as 0.1-0.2 As. Choose 2 <I> 12. sl fy I Ys
Sec. 2 Using <p 8 and for two branches ASI = 2x50 = 100 mm 2
Qu =k q w u L-w u (~+~) ~
6
2 2 193.3 X10 = 0.079 OJ= 0.101
25 x 200 x 700 2
194 195
step 5.3: Design for Shear
The critical section for shear is at the face of the column because the tie is in
Loads Factor Bending Critical tension. The width. of the column is 250 mm. The critical section is at section
k moment sections (1) as shown in figure with code coefficient of kq :::0.6.
Qu =k q Wu L-w u (%)
0.250)
Qu =0.6x92.8x5.0-92.8x ( -2- ::: 266.8 kN
....
C'l
I
...
. ,
I
Shear
....+
\0
\II
tie 0
C'l
«)
T
\II
C'l
0
....
o
I
c
tri
II
t-:l
....
C'l
1
>n
+ c3
"':
00
\0 r-
0 C'l
~I
c
tri
II
t-:l
Sec. 2
6
R = Mu = 232xI0 (0=0.124
1 feu b d 2 25 X 200 X 7002 = 0.0946 ---7 Qu 266.8 X 1000 ::: 1.9 N I mm 2
qu ::: b xd 200 x 700
A s -- ffeuy b X d = 0 .124 360
25 X 200 X 700 = 1203 mm 2
E
(j)
197
196
1
.,
":\1 ":.
. '.",.
~
:;:I
~
A =1.4X200XI25=145mm2 "'J ;J
.vI 280/1.15 In
tI)
.9
~'"
~
0 u
. branch =_J1
Thus, the area of one A. = _145 = 72 mm 2 ...-:
,..... '"'
0
2 2
\0
0 ~
"'"
<:::>
ori
II
Use ¢10@ 125mm -7 8¢101 m' tI)
A slmin =O.4
.
b 0.4
Iy- Xs =-x200xlO
280
0 = 2 8mm 2 <Ast .....0 k
1 In
""=
0
.. 0
~
In
..q-
II
E-<
'"
Step 6: Design of the tension tie (200 mm x 200 mm) Step 7: Design of the hanger (200 mm x 200 mm)
The tie is the main supporting element for the horizontal beam. The reaction is The weight of the hanger equals to:
transferred to the tie. For continuous beams with equal loads and equal spans,
the ECP 203 gives the reaction at intermediate supports as (1.1 WU S), as shown ow H = 25xO.2xO.2x2.4= 2.4 kN
in the figure below.
The weight of the tie equals to: Hanger
T =1.1xH max xS =1.1X92.8x5=51O.4kN
oW T = 25xO.2xO.2x2,667 = 2.667 kN
Choose (6 <I> 18+2 <I> 16) (As= 1929 mm 2) _ T = 7.1xlOOO = 22.6 mm2
As - Iy IUS 360/1.15
. 2
Choose 4 <I> 101m' (As =314 rom )
198
199
Step 8: Design of the column (250 mm x 600 mm)
Step 8.2: Calculation of the reinforcement
Step 8.1: Calculate applied loads
The unsupported length in X- direction is 6.0 ms and the unsupported length in
The ~olumn is subjected to an axial load in addition to bending moments y- direction is 3.4 ms. The calculation of the additional moment can be
resultmg from the slenderness effect. Since wind load is neglected the fOllowing summarized in the following table.
load case is considered .
1 I I I I I I II' I I J J J
J II J J
lj
Mtot = Mu+ Madd 43.6 0
It is clear from the previous table that the column is subjected to a uniaxial
I
R=O.45 WU L
I
R=l.l Wu L =354.4
I
R=l.Owu L
bending moment as shown in the figure.
~43.6kN.m
y
I
I- 5.0
• f. 5.0
-I 1
0.25
I
I
-I-·_·_·_j·_·_·-l-·_·_·_·_·_?C
Loads and the reactions of the vertical beam
T I" 0.60
-I
200
201
vertical column
o-r-
\0
ci- I -
Team 7- I
N
'<t
~
0
~~S
I.C5
0
~- I-- ~ ~ ~
tn
Il
~r:Q
0
- I--
~ <XI
i
(')
tn
N
o
II
..c><
~ co
semelle ...... o i
C\I
I
I B B <XI
j
i
(')
Since the column is long, the minimum reinforcement ratio Ilmin is given by:
fJmin = 0.25+0.052,.1. = 0.25 + 0.052x16.0 = 1.1082%
.
1.1082
As min = PlIlI'n xb Xt = - x 250x600 = 1623 mm
FI <XI
202 203
T""
I
T""
o
Q)
C/)
C\I
'.
iC\I
J
J:
t
~·f
-G.
co
8<0
I
~ 0
0
on
C\I
c: ~
0
E C\I
::J
(5 w
0
I
@ ~
=
c i=
I
1 Q:I 1
2
- ~
I ..,.
-t
!';r;l
S
Q:I
2
f-
2
I-
1
-
I:Q
U
~
Q:I
J,.,
~
;;... Photo 2.1 Corbels supporting beams in a stadium
1 1
- ~ -f- f-
~
2.1 Introduction
I
0 0
0 C\I 0 C\I
0 0 ~
<0
~ <0 co
~ This chapter will discuss the behavior of reinforced concrete deep beams and
C\I
~
..,.
·r I corbels (short cantilevers). The behavior of these members is different· from
shallow (slender beams). In deep beams and in corbels, plane sections before
J~
bending do not remain plain after bending. In order to fully understand the
behavior of these members, the subject of shear friction will be presented.
Another approach for designing these members is the Strut and Tie Model that
~H will be presented in Chapter Six of this volume.
~:.....J I
I 1
205
204
2.2 Deep beams Deep beams may be loaded at their top surface as in the case of a transfer girder
supporting the load from one or more columns (Fig. 2.2a). The loading may
2.2.1 General
take place at the bottom surface as in water tank wall loaded by the action of the
Deep beams are beams of relative) hi h d . suspended tank's floor (Fig. 2.2b). Loads may also act along the height of the
deep beams OCcur as transfer girde!s Agtran:~th-t~~pan ratIO. Most typically, wall as shown in Fig. (2.2c). The wall in this figure approximates the case of
one or more columns transferring it ~o oth e~ glr er supports the load from wall supporting successive floor slabs and transferring the loads to columns at
also occur in tanks and walls supported er co umn~ (Fig. 2.la). Deep beams
. on co lumns (Flg.2.lb). ground floor level.
(a) (b)
Transfer
girder
Fig. 2.2 Types of loading of deep beams
206 207
Elastic analysis of deep beams indicates that the usual assumption that plane Figure 2.4a shows a deep beam that is supporting uniformly distributed load
sections before bending remain plane after bending is not valid for such acting at the lower face of the beam. Vertical stirrups must be provided as
members. Thus, flexural stresses are not linearly distributed even in the elastic hangers to prevent local failure and to transfer the effective acting load to a
range. Typical stress distribution is shown in Fig. (2.3a). The cracking load of a higher level. If such a beam is provided with stirrups that are able to deliver the
deep beam is about 1/3 to 1/2 of the ultimate load. bottom load to the upper part of the beam, the beam will be behave nearly like a
Traditional principles of analysis and design of ordinary reinforced concrete top loaded beam.
beams are neither suitable nor adequate to determine the strength of reinforced
The crack pattern in Fig. 2.4b clearly shows that the l~ad is transferred upward
concrete deep beams. The cracking pattern of a uniformly loaded deep beam is
by reinforcement until it acts on the compression arch, which then transfers the
shown in Fig. (2.3b). After cracking a major tedistribution occurs and the elastic
loads down to the support as shown in Fig. 2.4c.
analysis is no longer valid. Deep beams loaded at the top behave mainly as a
tied arch as shown in Fig. (2.3c).
.. Tension
.. a) Loading pattern b) Cracking pattern c) Arch mechanism
(e)
Fig. 2.4 A bottom loaded deep beam
The tied-arch mechanism, shown in Fig. (2.3c), brings designer attention to the
fact that longitudinal tension reinforcement acting as a tie that is fully stressed
over neady the whole span. Therefore, sufficient anchorage at the supports and
continuity of reinforcement bars without curtailment are essential requirements
for top loaded deep beams.
208 209
2.2.2 Egyptian Code's Provisions for Deep Beams A: Design for Flexure
The Egyptian Code's provisions for deep beams are applied to deep beams The longitudinal reinforcement should be provided to resist the tension force
loaded at the top or at the compression faces. If loads are applied at the bottom that resulting from the applied bending moment. The tension force at any
of a deep beam, the Egyptian Code requires using vertical reinforcement that is section is gi ven by:
able to transfer the load to a height equals at least half the span. This. vertical
reinforcement should be added to that resulting from the design of the beam as
if it is a top loaded deep beam.
Tu = M u ...................: ........................... (2.3)
Yel
In deep beams plain sections do not remain plain after bending and the design Where Mu is the applied ultimate moment, Tu is the developed tension force at
methods developed for shallow beams can not be applied. The Egyptian Code the critical section, and Yet is the lever arm and is given by:
presents two methods for designing deep beams. These methods are:
• The Empirical design method Yct =0.86 L::::;0.87d For simply supported beams.
• The Strut and Tie method YC1 =0.43 L::::;0.87d For continuous beams at mid-span.
Y el = 0.37 L::::; 0.87 d For continuous beams at interior support.
2.2.2.1 The Empirical Design Method
The empirical design method applies to beams having the following ratios of The reinforcement can be obtained by dividing the developed tension force by
the span (L) to the effective depth (d): the steel yield stress as follows:
where L is defined with reference to Fig. (2.5) as the smaller value of the The distribution of this reinforcement differs from that of the slender beams.
following: The flexural reinforcement is placed near the tension edges. Because of the
L = 1.05 Ln ............................................ (2.2a) greater depth of the tension zone, it is required to distribute such steel over a
certain height of the cross-section (See Figs. 2.7 and 2.8).
L
.
=L 0
................................................ (2.2b)
I
The tied-arch mechanism of deep beams dictates that longitudinal tension
reinforcement acting as a tie is fully stressed over nearly the whole span of
simply supported deep beams. Therefore, sufficient anchorage at the supports
d and continuity of reinforcement bars without curtailment are essential
requirements. Recommendations for the detailing of deep beams are given in
Figs. 2.7 to 2.10.
The Egyptian code requires that the actual area of steel As in any section should
be greater than Asmin given by:
L
I. 1--1.----:-L~:----1,1.
1
Fig. 2.5 Definition of a deep beam
210 211
0.225 JJ: ~.!J.b d Nominal Ultimate Shear Stress
A Sflltn. = smaller 01· f y. fy ........................,(2.5) The applied shear stress is given by:
{
1.3 As
qu = b:Ug ~qumax .......................................... (2.7)
'{0.25 b d (mild steel) } Where b is width of the beam, and g = the smaller of d or Ln
100
but not less than
0.15 b d (high grade) The value of the nominal shear stress qu should be less than qwnax given by
100
The design for shear in deep beams is of special importance. The amount and in which
spacing of both the vertical and horizontal web reinforcement differ than those
used in shallow beams, as well as the expressions that to be used in design. bd =1/3 (2+0.4(Ln Id))~1 ................................ (2.9)
The critical section for shallow beams is taken at a distance d/2 from the face of
If q u ~ q u max' the dimensions of the section should be increased
the support, and the shear plane is inclined more and closer to the support.
However, in deep beams, the critical section for shear is to be taken as: It interesting to note the Od is less than or equal to one. This could wrongly
imply that the maximum shear strength is less than shallow beams. However,
Uniformly distributed ~ x = 0.15 Ln ................ (2.6a) this requirement is intended to prevent bearing failure in deep beam rather than
Concentrated load ~ x = 0.5 a ..................... (2.6b) controlling shear failure.
In either case, the distance x should not exceed the distance d/2 as shown in Fig Shear Strength provided by Concrete
2.6 .. If both uniform and concentrated load exist on the beam, design the most
The nominal ultimate shear provided by concrete is given as follows:
critical one.
• No axial load
i i
q cu =bdc XO.24!iU ~0.46~CU ............................ (2.10a)
! Critical sections ! ! Critical sections !
Yc Yc
V~
I I
V~
I I
Where
i
.
i
i
i
i
i
i bdc = 3.5 - 2.5 M u ~ 1.0
I i i Qu d
I i - i
i i l ~2.5
i
~-
I
~
I Mu : is the ultimate moment at the critical section.
i i
I
i
QII: is the ultimate shear at the critical section.
i
.i
Ln The factor b dc is a multiplier for qcu in shallow beams to account for the higher
b) Concentrated Load x < dl2
a) Unifonn Load x < dl2 resisting capacity of deep beams due to arching action.
212 213
• Axial compression (Pu )
where
P
0;, = (1 + 0.07 AU ):::; 1.5 ILJJIIIIIlllllllllllllJIIIllll
c
~t
• Axial tension (Tu)
®
3
qou = ode X q 0.24 ~cu ............................. (2.lO c)
--.....
®
Yo H
where 0, = (1- 0.3 Tu ) 4
Ac
A limiting value is placed by the code on qcu by the equation:
214 215
2.2.2.2 Design Using the strut and Tie Method
The Egyptian Code permits the use of the Strut and Tie Model (explained in
If, on the other hand, the value of q u exceeds q cu' web reinforcement should be
detail in Chapter 6) to design the beams in which the ratio of the effective span
provided to resist the ultimate shear stress q su • For deep beams in the ranges of to depth satisfies the following conditions:
the Lid ratios considered, diagonal cracks will be at a slope steeper than 45°.
Consequently, both horizontal and vertical web reinforcements are required. In A., Simply supported beams
fact, for such Lid ratios, horizontal reinforcement could be more effective than 1.2S::;'Lld ::;'4.0
vertical reinforcement. The horizontal bars are effective because they act more
nearly in the direction perpendicular to the diagonal crack. B- Continuous beams
The ECP-203 gives the following equations for calculating the web 2.S ::;, Lid ::;, 4.0
reinforcement for deep beams:
The model consists of compression struts in the concrete and tension ties in the
qsu =qu - q;u .......................................... (2.l2a)
steel reinforcement and truss nodes as shown in Fig. 2.8. The detail of the
application of the method for the case of deep beams is explained in Chapter 6,
qsu =b;, xqsllv +0" xqsuh ........................ (2.12b) together with illustrative examples.
in which
ll-(Lllld) p
0" = 12 .................................... (2.13a)
Truss node
°v -_l+(Lllld)
12
.
..................................... (2.13b)
Av x(fy IrS>
qsuv = ................... : ............. (2.13c) Compression
Sv xb Compression
strut
q,u" =
A" x(fy Irs> .
................................ (2. 13d)
strut
Sh xb
It can be concluded from Eq. 2.12 and Eq. 2.13 (as stated above) that horizontal
reinforcement is more effective than the vertical web reinforcement.
Equation 2.12b has four parameters (Av. Sv. All. SII). It is customary to assume the Tie force, T
value of these parameters and calculate the value of the shear carried by the
reinforcement qsu. The value of qsu in Eq. 2.12b should be greater than required
shear stress qsu given by Eq. 2.12a. Thus, assume three of these parameters to
obtain the fourth unknown.
Figure (2.7) shows the recommended reinforcement detailing of a simply
Fig. 2.8 Strut and tie model for a deep beam
supported top-loaded deep beam.
217
216
2.2.3 Detailing of Other Types of Deep Beams
2.2.3.1 Bottom Loaded Deep Beam
Figure 2.9 shows the reinforcement detailing of a bottom loaded deep beam. As
mentioned before, a bottom loaded deep beam could behave nearly like a top
loaded one if provided with vertical stirrups that are able to deliver the bottom
load to the upper part of the beam. It should be mentioned that these vertical
stirrups should be added to those required as shear reinforcement. The Egyptian
Code does not give special recommendations for the design of the bottom
loaded deep beam. However, it implicitly recommends designing them as
shallow beams.
®
@
®'
~
:r
~ @
c
218 219
- --, - -,.-
IA . " _._- _. - - v.uv L.. v.vv L. ~
- , JfL I As
I I
+vel
Ll
CD , As(-vel/2
L?
IS! As(-ve)/2
L!,\
tv
tv
o rE- ___CD ~
@
1- The main bottom steel should cover the whole span. rI-h @ @
2- One-half of the main top steel should be located at a height (0.8H< 0.8l)
and should cover the total length of the beam.
3- Span variations and variations in loads should not be more than 20%. @ @
4- In case of span variations, (l) is the bigger span.
- --, -1'-
IB
I U.<lU L U.<lU L U.VU L. U.<lU L
\ I
As (top)
I
,
@
0.80 I J:
«0.8 .)
DAD H
«0.4 L)
CD
@ @
1- The main bottom steel should cover the whole span.
2- One-half of the main top steel should be located at a height (0.8H< 0.8l)
and should cover the total length of the beam.
3- The vertical steel should be designed to deliver the bottom load to the @ @
upper part of the beam.
4- Span variations and variations in loads should not be more than 20%.
5- In case of span variations, (l) is the bigger span. Sec. A-A Sec. 8-8
LJW
Fig. 2.10b Reinforcement of a bottom-loaded continuous deep beam
2.2.3.3 Deep Beam Supporting another Deep Beam 2.3 Shear- Friction Concept
Special provisions are needed when loads or reactions are introduced along the There are many situations in reinforced concrete stru..:tures where it is necessary
full depth of a beam for example, when deep beams support each other, as to transfer shear across planes of weakness such as interface between concrete
illustrated in Fig. (2.11). cast at different times. Shear-friction concept provides a simple but poweiful
model to investigate situations such as those shown in Fig. (2.12).
-
A
"-
v
/ -~
Cast-in-situ
@
"
" "- 7'
7'
:r
®
"
" "
~
7'
7'
, I" 7'
~+ve)
I
®
' . . . . . .4 •••••• I. :
(b) Corbels
Fig. 2.11 Deep beam supporting another deep beam
Fig. 2.12 Applications of shear friction concept
223
222
Typical examples are reinforced concrete bridges in which the deck is cast-in- Shear displacement
':" ~
situ concrete slab supported on precast girders as shown in Fig. 2.12a. Another
example is corbels supporting crane girders.
L-
-- Q
UIllllllJ --
Q
The basis of this model is explained in Fig. (2.13). When shear is applied to an
initially cracked surface, or a surface formed by placing one layer of concrete on
top of an existing layer of hardened concrete, relative slip of the layers causes a
separation of the surfaces as shown in Fig. (2.13a). If there is reinforcement
across the crack, it is elongated by the separation of the surfaces. The elongation
of the reinforcement means that it is stressed in tension. For equilibrium of the
free body diagram at the interface, a compressive stress is needed as shown in
Fig. (2. 13b). Figure 2.13c shows aggregate interlock at crack interface.
224 225
Shear IS transmitted across the crack by: Table 2.1: Values of J.1 according to surface condition
1. Friction resuJting from the compressive stress. Crack Interface Condition JI.
2. Interlocking of aggregate protrusions on the cracked surfaces combined 1 Concrete cast monolithically 1.20
with dowel action of the reinforcement crossing the surface. 2 Concrete cast against hardened concrete with surface 0.80
. . . intentionally roughened
The shear stresses on the concrete face are assumed to be related to the
3 Concrete cast against hardened concrete not 'intentionally 0.50
compressive stresses by a coefficient of friction !-t. The maximum capacity is roughened or concrete anchored to structural steel by headed
assumed to be reached when the reinforcement crossing the crack yields leading studs or bars.
to a shear resistance of:
strength. Equation (2.14) states that the resistance to slip is equal to the nonnal
force times the coefficient of friction J.1.
Tests have shown that shear-friction capacity is also a function of the concrete
strength and the area of contact. As the concrete strength and the area of contact
increase, the aggregate interlock mechanism becomes more efficient aI?-d the
shear friction increases. Hence, there is an upper limit qn the shear resistance
due to friction:
Aif = Qu +~ .................................... (2.17) The steel must be placed approximately uniform across the shear plane so that
s JI. Iy I Ys Iy I Ys
all parts of the crack are clamped together. Each bar must be anchored on both
The values given by the Egyptian Code for the coefficient of friction (JI.) are sides of the crack to develop the yield strength. .
given in Table 2.1. The ultimate shear (Qu I A) shall not exceed the following limits:
226 227
The structural action of a short cantilever can be idealized as a truss made up of
2.4 Short Cantilevers (Brackets or Corbels) a compression strut and a tension tie as shown in Fig. (2. 16a). The inclination of
Corbels or brackets are short cantilever members that project from a column or the strut determines the tension in the tie by a simple force polygon. Since the
a beam to support another beam or heavy concentrated load. The importance of tension tie supports a constant tension force, sufficient anchorage of bars should
these members is clear in precast buildings where corbels support beams and be provided beyond the corbel interface with the column. Failure of the strut-
girders. Therefore, the total safety of these types of structures depends on the and tie model could occur as a result of yielding of the tension tie; failure of the
ability of the corbels and brackets to transfer the load safely to the columns. compression strut, or failure of the end anchorage of the tension tie.
Steel bearing plates or angles are commonly used in the top surface of the A direct shear failure could also be a possible mode of failure along the face of
brackets to provide a uniform contact surface and to distribute the reaction. the column as shown in Fig.(2.16b). Local failure under the bearing plate could
Short cantilevers are defined by the Egyptian Code as cantilevers whose shear occur. Finally, if the corbel is too shallow at the outside end, there is a danger
span-to depth ratio (aid) is 1.0 or less (See Fig. (2.15». This small ratio that cracking may extend through the corbel as shown in Fig. (2.16c). For this
changes the pattern and distribution of stresses similar to the case of deep reason, ECP 203 requires the depth of th~ corbel to be O.Sd at the outside edge
members. In corbels, a large horizontal force develops due to shrinkage and of the bearing plate.
creep of the supported elements such as beams that are connected to the corbels.
The code provisions apply to short cantilevers in which the depth at the outside
edge of the bearing area is not less that (O.Sd) where d is the depth m~asured at
,--_-=,,--Nu Shear friction )---<=l-,-- Nu
column face. Short cantilevers are designed to support beams transferring
reinforcement
vertical reactions Qu ' Horizontal force (N u) caused by restrained shrinkage,
creep in prestressed beams and expansion or contraction effects. Therefore, it is
advisable to consider a minimum horizontal force, Nu = 0.2Qu'
(a) (b)
~ d/2
t d
(c)
Fig. 2.15 Definition of a Corbel according to the Egyptian Code Fig. 2.16 Failure modes of corbels
229
228
The Egyptian Code requires that reinforcement be arranged as shown in P- The bending moment is calculated as follows (refer to Fig. 2.15). The flexural
(2.17). The main tension reinforcement is calculated to resist a moment (M u )lg. reinforcement Afis calculated using regular sectional analysis.
at
column face and a normal force (N u) . Mu =Qu a+Nu (t+ll-d) ............................ (2.20)
The area of steel required to resist the tensile force (N ;::: 0.2Q ) is given by..
U Il .
The shear-friction reinforcement (A.j) calculated using the shear-friction concept
is given by: .
A - Nu .
I! --I I ....................................................... (2.20)
y Ys Ai! = Qu +~ .................................. (2.21)
s Jl (/y 1YS) Iy I Y.
-- --------
,
Main steel, As
3. Vertical Stirrups
Corbels should also be provided with vertical stirrups that satisfies the
minimum requirements of the ECP-203.
230 231
Example 2.1
Solution
A transfer girder is to support two columns, each having a factored load of
Step 1: Check the applicability of the empirical method
7500 kN as shown in the figure. Its clear span is 7.0 m. The girder has to carry
also a factored uniform load, including its weight, having a value of 206.5 1.05 x clear span = 1.05 x 7.00 = 7.35m
kN/m'. The material properties are feu = 25 N I mm 2 and fy = 360 N I mm 2 •
Lett = smaller of { CL.to CL. = 7.8 m
Design the beam using the empirical design method presented in the Eep 203
:. Lejf = 7.35m
7500 kN 7500 kN Assume the distance from the bottom fibers to the center of the tension
reinforcement = 100 mm ~ d = 6000 -100 = 5900 mm
E
:. Yet = 5.13m
E
o
o
o
CD
I F=2.275 2.8
·1
7.00 m - - -_ _ --t.lq.891
232 233
. w X L2 I 206.5 X 7.35 2
Mmax(atIDld-span)= u +PuxL = 8 +7500x2.275 7500 7500
8
w u =206.5 kNlm'
= 18457 kN:m
1~457x106. = 11493mm 2
5130x 360'/1.15
0.
225
.JJ:: 0.22555 x650x5900=11984 mm2 .\ R
A.min =smaller of fy 360 .
{
l.3A. =1.3x11493=14941mm 2
Q=8006kN
8258.8 r--,-,....;.,'"---_
But notless than 0.15 b d = 0.15 x 650x5900 = 5752 mm 2
100 100 .
(-)
8258.8
Use 20 <I> 28 mm(=12315 mm2), arranged in three layers. Shear diagram
Assume that the top steel equals 15% ofthe bottom steel
Use (As) 4 <I> 25 mID. Step 3.2: Check the adequacy of the concrete dimensions
Step 3: Shear design Average shear stress at the critical section is given by:
Step 3.1: Straining actions at the critical sections Qu (g is the smaller of d (5900 mm) or L eff(7350 mm))
• The Cntical section for shear is at O.5a from the face of the support
qu = b xg
but not more than d/2 from the face of support. 3
= 8006 x 10 =2.09N /mm 2
o a /2 = 0.5(2500-400) = 1050mm qu 650x 5900
o d /2 = 5900 = 2950mm
2 Maximum allowable shear stresses, q umax = ad x 0.7 .Jlcu / Yc ::;; ad x 4
x = 7.35 - 2.8 - 2x 1.05 = 1.225m (CL distance) . 1 L
2 ad =3(2+0.4--:-)
• At the critical section for shear, the straining actions are:
. 735
ad = !(2 + 0.4 7.0) = 0.825
3 5.9
R = 206.5 x -'- + 7500 = 8258.88 kN
2
q umax = 0.825
.
x 0.7.J25/1.5 = 2.35N / mm 2 < 0.825x 4 ..... -+o.k
Q = R -w u x = 8258.88 - 206.5 x 1.225 = 8006 kN
Since the average shear stress at the critical section is less than the maximum
allowable shear stress, the concrete dimensions are adequate.
M u = R x -w u X 2 12 = 8258.88 x 1.225 - 206.5 x 1.225 2 /2 = 9962 kN .m
234 235
Step 3.3: Calculation of shear carried by concrete
qsu =1.13= 360 [0.182(226)+0.818(400)] ~ S" = 152.8 mm
b~(' =3.5-2.5(M u IQu d ) > 1.0 650x1.15 200 s"
< 2.5 Take Sh = 150 mm (satisfies code requirements)
9962
~/e = 3.5 - 2.5 x ( ) = 2.97 > 2.5 ~ ode = 2.5 Note: q su (provided) = 1.15 N 1mm 2 > q su (required) = 1.13 . ~ O.K.
8006 x 5.90
The concrete shear strength qcu is chosen as the smaller of: Check the s(ltisfaction of the minimum web reinforcement
1. qcu =~/e X 0.24 Jfcl/ 11.5 =2.5xO.24·h511.5 =2.45N Imm 2 A",min = 0.0015 b s" = 0.0015x 650x 200 = 195 mm 2 <Av .... ok
The average shear stress at the critical section is more than the shear can'ied by
concrete. Web reinforcement (vertical and horizontal) needs to be designed. 4 ~ 25
(11 - Lid) (1 I - -5
7.0)
9
Oh = Il = . =0.818
12 12
~16@150mm
(1 + L~)
°_+ ( 1 LII / d) _ 5.9
(Horizontal)
v-
12
-
12
=0.182 or 0,. =1-0" =1-0.818=0.182
JO~2B
6~28 14~28
qsu _ If' [0,,-
-b (A,,) +u,,(-)
s: A" ] ~ ® CD
rs s" s"
Try vertical bars of diameter 12.0 mm (2 branches) and horizontal bars of
diameter 16.0 mm (2 branches). CD--=:jJ
and A" ::=: 400mm 2 ®
Assul'Il:e s v = 200 mm (satisfies code requirement)
Reinforcement details
236 237
I Example 2.2 Step 3: Area of main reinforcement:
The bending moment acting on the bracket equals to:
Determine the required reinforcement for the bracket shown in figure according
to the following data: Mu = Qu·a + Nu(t+ /::i-d)
Bracket dimensions (b x t) =300 mm x 800 mm and d =750 mm, M u = 500 x 0.4 + 100(0.8 + 0.05 - 0.75) = 210kN .m,
2 2
feu = 25 N I mm and fy = 240 N lmm
Mu =0.67/cu h.ar(d -af 12)
Factored vertical load Qu =500 kN Yc
25
Factored horizontal load Nu= 100 kN M =210x10 6 =0.67x-x300xal x(750-af 12)
u 1.5
af --88 >0.1d
--.,------- 6
400 ______2_10_x_1_0__ _ _ _ _ =1425mm 2
1 Qu= 500 kN
(750-88/2)x 240/1.15
E
.-- o.o5-i-l--
I
o
o
Nu = 100 kN A
n
=~=
Iy 1Ys
3
100xl0 =479 mm 2
240/1.15 -
b
I' . I
..... --- AI xf).
Y.,
+~
LO
E Aif= Qu
~~/
s f.lly1ys Iylys
For monolithically cast concrete f.l =1.2 c
500 3 03
- 500xlO
A if- + 100x1 -2476
- mm
2 O.67 x fcu
s 1.2x 240 240/1.15 1.5
1.15
The area of the main reinforcement is the largest area obtained by evaluating
Step 1: Check the bracket dimensions: three equations:
To be classified as a corbel, the distance a should not exceed the effective The first equation
depth.
As =An +AJ
d =750 mm > a (400 mm) -+-+ok.
2
Step 2: Check the ultimate shear friction value: Then As =479+1425 = 1904mm
;~ ::;;O. 15f eu but not more than 4 N/mm2 The second equation
2
500x103 -As = An +'3 AsJ
= 2.22::;;0.15x25 =3.75 N Imm 2 O.K.
300x750
. 2 2
then As =479+-x2476=2130mm
3
238 239
The third equation
5$25
A = 0.03 feu bd =0.03x 25 x300x750=703mm2
S fy 240
Hence, the area main reinforcement is obtained from the second equation.
This area has to be distributed over 2/3 of the effective depth, i.e. over a
distance equals to (2/3x750) = 500 mm. 1/
'---~
7 Close_d_s_t.-t-il-'
6$12/m
Choose closed stirrups (two branches) having a bar diameter = 12 mm and
spaced at 166 mm.
The available area of horizontal stirrups = 113x2 x(5001166 +1) = 906.7 mm2 >
826mm2 O.K.
Reinforcement Details
Step 5: Find the area of the vertical stirrups
Assume that the spacing of the vertical stirrups is 200 mm.
0.4 b 0.4 2
As, =p.rrun b s =-x xs =-x300x200=1OOmm
fy 240 '
240 241
CONTROL OF DEFLECTIPNS
3.1 Introduction
The Egyptian Code is based on the limit states design method. The limit states
(states at which the stru'.":ture becomes unfit for its intended function) are
divided into two main groups: those related to collapse and those that disrupt
the use of the structures but do not cause collapse. These are referred to as
ultimate limit states and serviceability 'limit states, respectively. The major
242
serviceability limit states are excessive deflections, undesirable vibrations and
excessive cracking. Deflection control will be thoroughly presented in this yielding of reinforcement D
chapter. Control of cracking will be discussed in chapter four.
The adoption of the limit states design method in recent years, accompanied by to the ultimate load
the use of higher strength concrete and high-grade steel, has permitted the use -g service load
of relatively shallower members. As a result, deflection calculations gained .3
more importance than they were few decades ago. Excessive deflections of
beams and slabs may cause excessive vibrations, damage to the appearance of
the structure, poor roof drainage, and uncomfortable feelings for the occupants.
cracking Load - - - - - I
Also, such deflections may damage partitions and cause poor fitting of doors
and windows. Therefore, it is very important to maintain control of deflections. uncracked
The Egyptian code presents the following two approaches for controlling stage Cracking stage
deflection:
• Control of deflection by limiting the span/thickness ratio of the member.
o
• Control of deflection by calculating the deflection and set limitations to Midspan Deflection 11
its value.
The first approach indirectly controls the deflection by setting an upper limit for
span-to-thickness ratio. It is simple to follow without the need for deflection
calculations. However, if smaller members are required, the second approach
should be followed by calculating the deflections and comparing the computed
values with specific limitations imposed by the code.
243 244
Maximum
tension
cracking Loa
cracking stage
19>1. >ler '
tension
uncracked stage
a- Negative bending moment b-Positive bending moment
Ie=Ig
Midspan Deflection 11 Fig. 3.3 Determination of the distance Yt in simple and cantilever T -beams
1\
Fig. 3.2 Moment of inertia in concrete beams
3.3.2 Cracked Transformed Moment of Inertia
For design purposes, the calculation of the gross uncracked moment of inertia, , When the applied moment exceeds Mer. the developed tensile stress exceeds the
I g, can be carried out by neglecting the cross-sectional area of steel tensile strength of concrete producing cracks as shown in Fig. 3.4. The
reinforcement (e.g. Ig for rectangular sections = b e/12). For normal developed cracks will cause the moment of inertia to drop to a value less than
reinforcement ratios, the error in calculating Ig does not exceed 10%. the gross moment of inertia I g• Since concrete is weak in tension, it will crack
below the neutral axis and its contribution to the rigidity and strength will be
The ECP 203 gives the following formula for calculating the cracking moment:
neglected. On the other hand, the concrete in the compression zone acts
effectively and contribute to the section rigidity. The actual cracked section is
fetr· I g
Mer = - - ................................................ (3.1) non-homogeneous and consists of the compressed concrete above the neutral
Yt axis and the reinforcing steel bars below the neutral axis. The non-
where !clr is the concrete tensile strength (N/mm2), Ig is the gross moment of homogeneous section can be replaced by an imaginary homogenous section
inertia neglecting the effect of reinforcement (mm4), and Yt is the distance from called the transformed section.
the neutral axis to the extreme fiber in tension for the uncracked section (mm).
To obtain the transformed section of a reinforced concrete beam, the area of the
"In the ECP 203, the concrete tensile strength!c,r is given by:
reinforcing steel bars As is replaced by an equivalent area of concrete equals
nAs, in which n= E/Ee is the modular ratio (the modulus of elasticity of steel I
fetr =0.6.,JJ:: ...........................................:... (3.2) modulus of elasticity of concrete). The moment of inertia of this transformed
For rectangular sections, YI equals to half the section thickness. For T -sections section is called the cracked transformed moment of inertia Ier.
the reader should pay attention to the direction of the bending moment. Thus,
for T -section in cantilever beams the distance YI is measured from the top fibers
Fig.3.3.a and for T-sections in simple beams it is measured from the bottom
fibers as shown in Fig.3.3.b.
245 246
bx Z2 /2-n A., (d - z) =0 .............................. (3.3)
Having determined the neutral axis distance z, the cracked moment of inertia Ier
can be computed as
cracked bxz
3
2
zone Ier =-3-+ n As (d - z) ............................. (3.6)
• • • As
Using the previous set of equations, design chart was prepared to facilitate the
Uncracked section Cracked section determination of the Ier for singly reinforced section (refer to the Appendix).
Fig. 3.4 Cracking of concrete section under applied loads For doubly reinforced section, the compression steel displaces the stressed
concrete and has a transformed area of (n-1)As Referring to Fig. 3.5 and taking
The neutral axis is located at distance z from the compression face. The location the first moment of area about the top fibers gives:
of the neutral axis can be easily determined by taking the first moment of area
about the center of gravity of the section (c.g.). It should be noted that the bxz 2 /2+(n-1) A; (z-d')-n As (d _Z)2 =0 ............. (3.7)
center of gravity coincides with neutral axis (no normal force). The previous equation is a quadratic equation in z and can be solved directly.
b b Te value of z can be directly obtained from Eq. 3.8.
-I 1• -I (n-l)A's
.'Jz I
I
I
wh<1re
al =bl2
. bf- aJcJ ................................... (3.8)
-bJ+.J
z = 4
2 aJ
I
bl =n As + (n-1) A's
•••• As
._.~~"\~
• I
nAs Cl =-[(n-1) As d' + n As d]
1._._._._ . .:
The cracked moment of inertia equals
Cracked section
linear stress
distribution Transformed section bxz··
3'
2 " 2 .
'.
Icr=-3-+nAs (d-z) +(n-1)As (z-d) ...................... (3.9)
Fig. 3.5 Determination of the neutral axis and cracked transformed Design aids for calculating the cracked moment of inertia for rectangular
moment of inertia calculations sections with tension steel only are given in Appendix.
247 248
ill T-sections, the neutral axis could be located inside or outside the flange as 3.3.3 The Effective moment of inertia Ie
shown in Fig. 3.6. Therefore, hand calculations should be carried out as Sections located at tension cracks have their moment of inertia approximately
explained in the illustrative examples. equal to the transformed cracked moment of inertia Ier. However, between
cracks the moment of inertia could be approximately taken equals to I g •
B
Referring to Fig. 3.4, it is clear that a cracked reinforced concrete beam behaves
as a beam with variable moment of inertia. To simplify deflection calculations,
..... J7-'-'-
neutral
the cracked RC beam is assumed to have a constant moment of inertia (called
the effective moment of inertia Ie).
The effective moment of inertia has a value less than Ig but is greater than Icr•
n As --- •••
axis The most widely accepted formula for estimating the effective moment of
inertia was developed by Branson and IS adopted in the Egyptian code. This
empirical equation, presented graphically in Fig. 3.7, was based on statistical
Neutral axis inside the flange z<ts Neutral axis outside the flange z>ts analysis of deflections measured from test data, and is given by:
Ie
Figure 3.6 shows variation of the effective moment of inertia With the applied
moment Ma. In this figure, the horizontal axis refers to the applied bending
moment and the vertical axis refers to the moment of inertia that should be used
in deflection calculations. It is clear that if the applied moment is less than
cracking moment of the beam; deflection is calculated using the gross moment
Photo 3.2 Reinforced concrete building
249 250
of inertia Ig. On the other hand, if the applied moment is greater than the 3.4 Code Provisions for Control of Deflections
cracking moment, deflection is calculated using the effective moment of inerr
Ie. It is interesting to note that the value of the effective moment of inert::
approaches the cracked moment of inertia as the applied moment increases. II The Egyptian code presents two approaches for controlling deflection. The first
is indirect by setting an upper limit for span-to-thickness ratio. In the second
approach, the computed member deflections are compared with specific
I limitations imposed by the code.
~
I
The values listed in Table (3.1) are valid when using high grade steel 400(600.
In the case of using other types of reinforcing steel, the values mentioned in
Table 3.1 should be divided by factor~, given by:
f=0.40+
iy .................................... (3.14)
650
Where h is the yield strength 'of reinforcing steel in N/mm2•
251 252
T-sections
The limiting values listed in Table 3.1 are also valid for T-sections by
multiplying the values by the reduction factor 0 determined from the either Eq. Also the slab thickness should be greater than troin
3.15 or Fig 3.8. a
for simply supported slabs
35
8 = 0.71 +0.29 (:);::: 0.8 ..................................... (3.15) a
tmin = for slab continuous frorp. one side ............... (3.17)
40
a
for slab continuous from two sides
1.00 B 45
V
~-- where a is the short direction.
c.o 0.95
, .., V
.-.~
~
....
0
~
0.90 3.4.2 Control of Deflection by Limiting its Value
.s 0.85 /
:=
.~
0.80
..,,-100"" Calculations of deflections are carried out in the following cases:
~
:= • Values of span-to-thickness ratios given in Table 3-1 are not satisfied.
't:I
0.75
~ • Span of the beam is more than 10 ms or length of the cantilever is
0.70 greater than 2 ms.
o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
• The member is subjected to heavy or uneven loads or located in
(bIB) ratio abnormal type of building.
Fig. 3.8 Modification of LIt ratio for T -sections 3.4.2.1 Calculation of Immediate Deflection
Deflection of reinforced concrete members can be calculated using the simple
3.4.1.2 Two-way slabs Resting on Rigid Beams structural analysis expressions. Examples of these expressions are given in Eq.
3.18, the rest is given in appendix A. It interesting to note that the deflection of
For two-way slabs resting on rigid beams, having spans of less than 10 meters, a uniformly loaded simple beam is five times the deflection of a uniformly
subjected to uniform loads that are not heavy and attached to non-structural loaded beam with fixed ends.
elements not likely to be damaged by large deflections, the deflection
calculations can be waived if the slab thickness is grater than t calculated using w L4
for fixed end beam with uniform load (w )
the following equation: 384EJe
5w L4
. a(0.85+~)
for simple beam with uniform load (w )
384EJe
. 1600
t = 20 > 100 mm ................... (3.16) P L3
...... (3.18)
/).= for simple beam with point load at midspan
15+-+IOPp 48EJe
bla
W L4
for cantilever beam with uniform load (w )
Where 8EJe
a is the smaller dimension of the slab, b is longer dimension of the slab., /3 p is
P L3
the ratio between the length of all continuous ed~es to the total perimeter, andh for cantilever beam with point load at edg (P)
is the yield strength of reinforcin,g steel in N/mm 3EJe
253
254
Where Ie and L are the effective moment of inertia and the beam span,
"·r·'
""'<',."
.• :,,
!
;:s•. ~.'.
,~
where ~DL is the deflection due to dead loads including the own weight of the - E
member and the weight of the finishes and ~LL is the deflection due live loads.
0
CI) /' A's=O.5Jl is
Due to the combined effect of creep and shrinkage, the deflection increases with 100
~
time. The factors affecting long-term deflection include humidity, temperature, 0 80 IL:::::. long-ter In deflection
curing conditions, ratio of stress to strength, the age of concrete at the time of ....s::
Cii
60 ///
., A's=As
loading and compression steel content. If the concrete is loaded at an early age, CI)
E 40 Immeat te aenectlOn
its long-term deflection will be increased. The creep deflection after about five .;:
years can range two-three times the initial deflection. It should be noted that
CI)
a. 20
more than 90% of the long-term deflection occurs at the first five years after the >< 0
w
initial loading. o 100 200 500 600
300 400
cr"""~f
concrete Fig. 3.10 Effect of compression reinforcement on long-term deflection
beam ' stram a ter
curvature creep
after creep Based on experimental results, the ECP 203 specifies that additional long-term
deflection due to creep ~reep is calculated by multiplying the dead load
deflection ~DL by the factor a. For a singly reinforced section this factor is
equal to 2. The reduction factor a for sections with compression steel can be
computed from the following relation: (A' ) .
a = 2-1.2 A: ;: : 0.6 ............................. (3.~1)
Fig. 3.9 Effect of creep on deflections, curvature and strains. ~Iotal =~creep +~DL +~u ......................... (3.23)
255
256
ri
i • The ECP 203 requires that the immediate deflections due to live loads
=(1+a)I1 DL +l1u ................. :........ (3.24)
1110lal
i
I
only for beams and slabs supporting or attached to non-structural
elements not likely to be damaged by large deflections, to be limited to:
3.4.2.3 Permissible Deflections
i 11 <~ .................•................................ (3.26)
As mentioned before, deflections of roofs and floors may cause cracking of ! LL -360
brick walls and malfunction of doors and windows. Moreover, deflection due to
accumulated water on the roof may cause additional deflections allowing it to
I
! • The ECP-203 requires that for beams and slabs carrying non-structural
hold more water. The ECP 203 imposes the following deflection limits: elements that are likely to be affected by deflection such as curtain
walls, the part of the total deflection that occurs after the execution of
• The total deflection of members in ordinary buildings under the effect of the floor finishes and partitions and that results from all loads including
all loads including the effect of temperature, shrinkage and creep, the effect of temperature, shrinkage and creep to be limited to:
measured from the support level should be limited as follows:
L
1- For beams, one-way labs and two-at-slabs: I1p = I1LL + a 11,,,,, ~ 480 ................................ (3.27)
Jk\I
Simple beam One end continuous beam
-I
£
L=O.76Lb
Continuous beam
Cantilever beam
Fig. 3.11 Definition of L in deflection calculations Photo 3.3 Beam deflection during testing
257 258
Table 3.2 Maximum permissible deflections \ Deflection Calculations \
I
Type of member Deflection to be considered Deflection
Calculate the total deflection under the
limit effect of all loads including the long-term
effect !:ito/al and check the following limits:
Beams and slabs in ordinary Total deflection (measUred from the L 1250 for
~ L/250 for beams and slabs
buildings level of the support) under the beams & slabs
~ LI450 for cantilevers
effect of all loads including the I.
L 1450 for
Calculate other types of
effect of temperature, shrinkage and
deflections and check the
cantilevers
creep satisfaction of code limits
I
Beams and slabs supporting Immediate deflection due to live LI360
I
i
!
260
259
For a beam with concentrated negative moment MI at beam end the deflection
3.4.2.4 Deflection of Continuous Beams
equals
3xL2
For continuous spans, the ECP 203 calls for a simple average value for the Ll = MI ....................... ··················· (3.31)
effective moment of inertia obtained from Eq. 3.10 as follows: I 48 Ec I;
I; = 0.50 Iem + 0.25x (lei + I e2 ) ........................ (3.28) Referring to Fig. 3.13 and by using the principle -of super-p~sition, one can
concluded that the mid span deflection Ll for a continuous beam IS
where I~ is the average effective moment of inertia, Iem is the effective moment 2
of inertia at mid-span and leI and Ie2 are the values of the effective moment of Ll = 5xL [M -O.lx(MI +M 2 )] •••••••••••••••••• (3.32)
inertia calculated at the negative moment sections. Figure 3.13 shows the 48xEc I; m
application of Eq. 3.28 for the calculation of the average effective moment of
inertia for an interior span of a continuous beam. The value of the effective where MI M and M2 are the bending moments at end 1, midspan, and end 2
moment inertia at mid-span Iem is calculated form Eq. 3.10 using the maximum respectiv~ly. To calculate the dead load deflection for example, one should use
moment Mam. On the other hand, the values of leI and Ie2 are calculated from the dead load moment Mm,DL at midspan and at the two ends (MI,DL and M2,DL)'
Eq. 3.10 suing the maximum negative moments Mal and Ma2.
Fig. 3.13 Calculation of the effective moment of inertia for continuous beams
For continuous beams in which the exterior support does not prevent any
rotation (brick wall), the effective moment of inertia can be approximated by
5xL2
Ll= ,Mo ......................................... (3.30)
48 Ec Ie
Photo 3.4 Deflection of a simply supported beam during testing
261 262
Example 3.1 Step 2: Calculate the cracking moment and the applied moment
The cantilever beam shown in the figure below carries an unfactored dead load 7:-
/.clr = 0 •6"leu = 0.6..j35 = 3.55 N I mm
2
of 11.5 kN/m' and an un factored live load of 6 kN/m'. The beam is located at a
typical floor and supports walls that are not likely to be damaged by deflection. 9
. = fetr.lg =3.55x6.4x10 x-1-=56.79kN.m
It is required to calculate the immediate and the long-term deflections. Does Mer 400 106
the beam meet ECP 203 requirements for deflections? Y t
From the appendix, the maximum deflection for a cantilever beam carrying
Solution uniform load equals to:
6x(2.2x1000)4 = 0.11 mm
8 x 26030 x 6.4 x 109
Uncracked section
263 264
"
-
Step 3.2: Calculate the long-term deflection Example 3.2
The total deflection due to all loads including the effect of creep equals The simple beam shown in the figure below is located at a roof f a building
and it does not support any partitions. The unfactored dead load is (including
!::"total =(I+a)!::..DL +!::..u own weight) 15.0 kN/m', and the unfactored live load is 9.0 kN/m' . Check
whether the beam meets the ECP 203 requirements for deflections.
Since A's=O then a=2 feu =25 N/mm2 •
• Since the beam is located at a floor and support walls that are not likely to
be damaged by deflection, then
6.0m
!::.. < L < 2200 _ 6 11
LL(allowable) - 360 - 360 - . mm
Since !::..LL (0.11 mm) < !::..LL(allowable) (6.11 mm), the code limit is satisfied.
250mm
I• •I
o
o
\0
4<l>16
••••
Beam Section
./
,
.. -~
.\
.,.1'
,/f(/" ";
.~:(--
' ..
!
-IIi
Uncracked section
Original section
Transformed section
Taking the first moment of area for the transformed section about the N.A.,
gives:
Step 2: Calculate the cracking moment and the applied moment
250x z x~ = 8040 (550 - z)
2
fetr = 0.6.J7: = 0.6.[i5 = 3 N I mm 2 125 Z2 + 8040 z - 4422000 = 0
_ W total L2 __ 24x6 2 I
3
= 250x158.68 +lOx804x(550-158.68)2 =1.56x10 9 mm
4
Ma 8 8 = 108 kN .m ... > Mer (cracked section analysis)
cr 3
Since Ma > Mer then calculate Ie
Step 4: Calculate the effective moment of inertia
2
Step 3: Calculate the cracked section properties if
E c = 4400V J cu = 4400.[i5 = 22000 N I mm
267 268
Step 5: Calculate the deflection Example 3.3
Step 5.1: Calculate the immediate deflection The T -beam shown in figure is subjected to an unfactored dead load of 20
kN/m' and an unfactored live load of 8 kN/m'. The beam supports partitions
W DL = 15 kN/m' =15 N/mm' that are sensitive to deflection. Calculate the immediate deflection and check
WLL =9 kN/m' =9 N/mm' ECP 203 requirements, knowing that 30% of the liveJoads are permanent loads.
The concrete strength is 20 N/mm2 •
The maximum dead load deflection for simple beam at mid span equals
The total deflection due to all loads including the effect of creep equals:
I I! I
!:1total = (1 + a) !:1VL +!:1 u '
Y=250.2 mm
o
o00
Al
y,=400mm
Y2=60mm
Uncracked section
269 270
Al = 200 x 800 =160000 mm 2 Step 3: Calculate the cracked section properties
~ = (1250 - 200)x120 =126000 mm 2 As = 3<I> 22 = 1140.4 mm2
Assume that the neutral axis is located at a distance z from the compression
- = 160000x400 + 126000x60 =250.2mm force. Transforming the steel reinforcement into equivalent area of concrete
Y 160000 + 126000
gives:
3 3 nAs=1O x 1140.4 = 11404 mm2
Ig = 200 X 800 +160000x(400-250.2)2 + (1250-200)x120
12 12 Assuming concrete cover of 50 mm, d=800-50 =750 mm
+ 126000 x (250.2 - 60)2
12_5_0_ _
1 -_ _ _ -11_1_ I
--L 1250
----=..:;...:....::...----1
1-1
1250
Exact calculation for the c.g. Quick estimate for the c.g.
120
)
Yc=250.2mm
o
o
00
T To quickly determine whether or not the c.g. is inside the flange, calculate the
YF549.8mm first moment of area at the end of the slab.
120
!clr 1250x120x- > 11404 x (750 -120)
2
Hence, assume the c.g. inside the flange. Taking the first moment of area for the
transformed section about the c.g.
9
M =fetr.lg = 2.683xI6.83x10 x_1_· =82.15kN.m
er Yt 549.8 106 1250xzx~ =11404 (750- z)
2
W total = 20 + 8 = 28 k!'f I m' 625 Z2 + 11404 Z - 8553000 =0
M = W total L2 = 28x7.22 z =108.21 mm < 120 mm (inside the flange as assumed)
181.44kN.m
a 8 8
Calculating cracked moment of inertia Ier
Since Ma> Mer then calculate Ie
271 272
_ B Z3
Ier --3-+nAs(d-z)
2
1 Step 5: Check the code requirements
•.. Tile .code maximum limit for simple beams = 720012S0 = 28.8 mm.
I
3
Ier = 12S0x108.2 +1l404x(7S0-108.2)2 =S.22x109 mm 4 Since dtotal (19.19 rom) < dallowable (28.8 mm), the code limit is satisfied.
3
• Since the beam is attached to partitions that are likely to be damaged by
Step 4: Calculate the effective moment of inertia large deflections, the code also requires that:
2
Ec = 4400K = 4400m = 19677 N I mm L 7200
r
d LL +a d :::=:;-:::=:;--:::=:;IS mm
• sus 480 480 .
273 274
Example 3.4 Step 2: Calculate the effective moment of inertia
2
The floor beam shown in figure is subjected to an unfactored concentrated dead Ee = 4400fJ: = 4400.J4(j = 27828N I mm
load of 80 kN, and an unfactored concentrated live load of 55 kN (the own
weight of the beam may be neglected). The beam supports glass partitions that
are likely to be damaged by large deflections. Check the satisfaction of ECP Ie = Ier +(Ig -IJ(: : ) 3
203 limits for deflection. The concrete compressive strength is!cu=40 N/mm2
I = 2.72 X109 + (8.8X109 -2.72XI09).( 88.94)3
250 e 202.50
I.. .. I
9 4
• PDL=80kN Ie = 3234016475 = 3.23x10 mm
Pu=55kN
Step 3: Calculate the deflection
• • •• 4<1>16
A
I ~
Step 3.1: Calculate the immediate deflection
P L3 ,.
The deflection for a simple beam carrying a concentrated load equals - - -
-L3
. 48 Ee Ie
!J.. =!J.. X
PLL =4x 55 =2.75 mm
LL DL P 80
DL
~otal = 80 + 55 = 135 kN The total deflection due to all loads including the effect of creep equals:
!J../otal = (l+a) !J.. DL +!J.. u
Ma = ~olal L = 135x6 = 202.5 kN.m
4 4 !J..
lolal = (1 + 1.4) 4.0 + 2.75 = 12.35 mm
Since Ma >Mcr , then calculate Ie
275 276
Step 4: Check the code requirements Example 3.5
• The code maximum limit for simple beams = 6000/250 = 24.0 mm. The T -beam shown in figure is a part of a roof and it supports a triangular ~oad.
Since Lltota1 (12.35 mm) < Llallowable (24.0 mm), the code limit is satisfied. The beam supports partitions that are not likely to be damagedby deflectIOns.
• Since the beam is attached to partitions that are likely to be damaged by Does the beam shown in the figure below satisfy the ECP 203 requirements for
2
large deflections, the code also requires that: deflections? The concrete strength is 25 N/mm • Assume of n=lD. All the
given loads are unfactored
L 6000
Llu + a Llsus ::; - : : ; --::; 12.5 mm
480 480
1400
.. ,
100
Llsus =4.0 mm
2.75+1.4x4.0=8.3Smm <12.5 mm ..... .o.k
I\ 0
0
'D
T
A's=3<\>16
1-1
250
WDL=24 kN/m'
WLL=lO kN/m'
3.60m
277 278
Solution
1400 !etr
Step 1: Ca~culat~ the uncracked section properties ~~------------
)
100
Y=191.51 mm
o
o
\0
Al
. ~ , .,: .t\
9
"
Uncracked section Mer = fetr.lg = 3.Ox8.66x10 x_l_ = 135.73 kN.m
. '';'
Yt 191.51 10 6
280
279
Assume that the neutral axis at a distance z from the compression force. The 250x 190.433
reader should notice that the compression part for cantilever is at the bottom of Ier == + 5428x(190.43-50)2 + 14726x(550-190.43)2
3
the section.
= 2.58x109 mm 4
Transforming the steel reinforcement into an equivalent area of concrete, gives:
nAs=lO x 1472.6 = 14726 rom2 Step 4: Calculate the effective moment of 'inertia
The steel in the compression is transformed by multiplying with (n-l) to
Ec = 4400JI: = 4400.J25 = 22000 N / mm 2
r
account for the concrete area.
(n-1) A's=(lO-l)x 603.2 = 5428.8 rom2
Ie = leT +(Ig -Ier )( : :
Assuming concrete cover of 50 rom, d = 800-50 =750 rom
It-~-I
100 Step 5: Calculations of the deflections
o _neglect the cracked zone
N
T >rl
>rl Step 5.1: Immediate deflection
The deflection for this cantilever beam is the sum of the deflection due to the
concentrated load and that due to the uniform load. These deflections are given
by ~?e following equations:
Calculate cracked moment of inertia I er. f1 = W DL L4 + PDL L3 24x(3.6xlOOO)4 (14x 1000) x (3.6 X 1000)3
---..:..---~- +-'-----'-~---'---
DL 30 E c I e 3 E c I e 30x22000x6.86x109 3x22000x6.86x109
b Z3 " 2 2
=2.33 mm
Ier =-+(n-l) As(z-d) +n A/d -z) f1DL
3 .
281 282
The live l?ad deflection equals: Example 3.6
.& _ w ii.:L,4::'f,:r:LL :L3 = lOx (3.6 X 1000)4 + (8x 1000) x (3.6x 1000)3 The reinforced concrete one-way slab shown in the figure below supports an
; .', J,L . . 30 is I
c e
+'~3 E'1
c 'e
'. 30x 22000 x 6.86 X 109 3x 22000 x 6.86x109 unfactored dead load of 6 kN/m 2 and an unfactored live load of 3 kN/m •
2
!J.. LL = 1.20 mm Calculate the immediate and long-term deflections at point (B). !CU equals 30
2
N/mm •
\.
,a.=:'.2-1.2...(A:)
_' =2-1.2 (-603
-) =1.512::0. 6 · .. o.k.
~ \~11lm' I
.1
~,," A. ' .' 1472 3.6m 3.6m
. :.::'~,'~:r5'{,~ :,~';;:J;::~ . .'ii .
11/0/01 = (1 + 1.51)2:33 +'1:20 = 7.05 mm
Since I1LL (1.2 mm) < I1 LL(allowable) (10 rom), the code limit is satisfied.
ii
/ 3.6 3.6
1'
1
Floor plan
283 284
Solution
Step 1: Calculate the uncracked section properties'
Taking a 1m slab width of the (b=1000 mm)
Yt=70mm
3 3
I = bxt = 1000x140 = 228x10 6 mm 4
g 12 12
1000 . ,. Cracked section at B
I I
~.~~ . Step 3.2: Sections A and C
.•
Uncracked section The positive reinforcement is not developed at supports, hence it will not be
considered as compression steel for sections subjected to negative moment at
Step 2: Calculate the cracking moment the supports (i.e. A~ =0).
285 286
Step 4: Calculate the effective moment of inertia
T
W lo/ al = 6+3 = 9 kN 1m 2
Thus, for a 1m width of the slab, Wtotal =9 kNlm' I
Since the slab is continuous with equal spans and loading, the code coefficients 2
C 8 14.58 10.74 80.3 x 10° cracked 139.56 x 106 (ld** D.DL = 1.93 mm
Since the relation between deflection and load is linear, we can determine the
Note the values of the effective moment of inertia (given in the table) for deflection due to live load as a ratio of that due to dead load as follows:
section Band C are calculated as follows:
W 3
D.u = D.DL x--1£. =1.93x- = 0.96 mm
WDL 6
•I
e,
B =I
em
= 63.1x10 6 + (228.6 X106 -63.lx106 )(10.74) 3
11.66
=192.2 X106 mm 4
The immediate deflection D.i equals:
3
6 4
D.i =D.DL +D.u =1.93+0.96=2.89mm
"I c =1 2 = 80.3 x 106 + (228.6X10 6 _80.3X106 )(10.74) = 139.56xI0 mm
<. e 14.58
The total deflection due to all loads including the effect of creep equals:
Since the slab is continuous, the average value of I~ should be calculated. D./o/ai = (1 + a) D. DL + D. u
Since A's=O, then a=2
287 288
4
Step 5: Check the code requirements
• The code maximum limit for one-way slabs =U250, where L is the length
between the inflection points. Since the slab is continuous from one end the
length L equals 0.87 (3600) =3132 mm.
Since ~total (6.75 mm) < ~allowable (12.53 mm), the code limit is satisfied. CONTROL OF CRACKING
4.1 Introduction
In Chapter (1) of volume (1), the concept of limit states design was discussed.
The limit states (the states at which the structure becomes unfit for its intended
function) are divided into two groups: those leading to collapse and those that
disrupt the use of structures but do not cause collapse. These are referred to as
the ultimate limit states and the serviceability limit states, respectively. The
major serviceability limit states for reinforced concrete structures are,:
excessive deflections, and excessive cracking. This chapter presents the ,,,
serviceability limit state of cracking.
290
289
4.2 Reasons for Controlling Crack Widths
Crack widths should be limited for the following reasons:
1. Wide cracks lead to concern by owners and occupants. Previous studies
suggested that cracks wider than 0.25 to 0.33 mm leads to public concerns.
2. Preventing the corrosion of reinforcement. Corrosion of steel OCcurs if
T
~
---
T
wetting and drying cycles occur such that the concrete at the level of the (a) Direct tension cracks
steel is alternatively wet and dry. It does not occur in permanently saturated
concrete members because water prevents oxygen flow to the steel.
3. Preventing leakage in liquid-retaining structures.
-----~ --
c _________ _
Photo 4.2 Cracks in a bridge member due to rusting of the reinforcement Fig. 4.1 Types of cracks
291 292
·1····
j
4.4 Development of Cracks due to Loads I
4.5 Crack Control in the Egyptian Code
Figure 4.2a shows an axially loaded prism. Cracking starts when the tensile
stress in the concrete reaches the tensile strength of concrete at some point in 4.5.1 Categories of structures
the member. When this occurs, the prism cracks. Figures 4.2b and 4.2c show
the variation in the steel and concrete stresses along the axially loaded prism.
At the cracks, the steel stress and strain are at a maximum value. At the The Egyptian Code categorizes reinforce~ co~crete structures according to
location of the cracks, the stresses in the concrete are equal to zero, while their exposure to environmental effects as glven ill Jable 4.l.
between the cracks, stresses start to develop in the concrete. This reaches a
maximum value mid-way between two cracks. Table (4.1) Categories of structures according to the exposure of concrete
The width of the crack, w, is the difference in the elongation of the steel and tension surface to environmental effects
the concrete over a length A~B equal to the crack spacing:
Category Degree of exposure to environmental conditions
B
W = f (cs-cc) d:x .•......••....•.•...••....•.••••....••..... (4.1) Structure with protected tension sides such as:
A
One
where Cs and Cc are the strains in the steel and concrete, respectively, at a given i- All protected internal members of ordinary buil~ngs.
location between A and B and x is measured along the axis of the prism. ii- Permanently submerged members in water (wlthout
harmful materials) or members permanently dry.
The crack spacing and the strains in the steel and concrete are difficult to iii- Well insulated roofs against humidity and rains.
determine in practice and empirical equations are usually used to compute the Structures with unprotected tension sides, such as:
crack width.
Two i- Structures in open air, e.g. bridges and roofs without
-;: .;;/:::- :~: ' .JJ _{} J. ..J/ good insulation.
-
moisture.
iii- Water tanks.
v- Structures SUbjected to vapour, gases or weak
(b) Variation of steel stress along bar chemical attack.
Members with tension sides very severely exposed to
Four corrosive influences of strong chemical attack that ,cause
rusting of steel
i- Members subjected to conditions resulting in rust of
(c) Variation of concrete stress along prism . steel such as gases; vapour including chemicals.
ii- Other tanks, sewerage and structures subjected to sea
water.
Fig 4.2 Stresses in concrete and steel in a cracked element
293
294
The Egyptian Code requires a minimum suitable cover for protecting the steel
reinforcement. The cover should not be less than the larger value determined
from Table (4.2) or the largest bar diameter.
1 where
13= Coefficient that relates the average crack width to the design crack
width. It shall be taken as follows:
1.7 For cracks induced due to loading
1.3 For cracks induced due to restraining the deformation in a section
Tab~e (4.2) Minimum concrete cover** (mm)
having a width or depth (whichever smaller) less than 300 mm.
1.7 For cracks induced due to restraining the deformation in a section
Category of All element except walls Walls and Solid slabs having a width or depth (whichever smaller) more than 800 mm.
structure - Table and slabs For cross sections having a width or depth (whichever smaller) between
(4.1) feu :525 value 300 mm and 800 mm, the coefficient 13 shall be proportionally
feu )25 feu :525 feu )25
calculated.
N/mm2 2 N/mm2 N/mm2
N/mm
One 25 20
<I> = Bar diameter in mm. In case of using more than one diameter, the
20 20 average diameter shall be used.
Two 30 25 25 20 131 = A coefficient that retlects the bond properties of the reinforcing steel. It
shall be taken equal to 0.8 for deformed bars and 0.5 for smooth bars.
Three 35 30 30 25
132 = Coefficient that takes into account the duration of loading. It shall be
taken equal to 1.0 for short term loading and 0.50 for long term loading
Four 45 40 40 35 or cyclic loading.
Coefficient that retlects the effect of bond between steel and concrete
** The concrete cover should not be less than the largest bar diameter between cracks. It shall be taken equal to 0.8 for deformed bars and 1.6
for smooth bars.
In case of members subjected to imposed deformation, the values of kl
4.5.2 Satisfaction of Cracking Limit State
shall be modified to kkl where the value of k is taken as follows:
In order to satisfy the limit state of cracking, the Egyptian Code requires the
fulfillment of the following relation: k= 0.80 for the case in which the tensile stresses are induced due to
restraining the deformation. For rectangular cross section, the value of k
Wk =/3.Srm· esm :$ W kmax •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• (4.2) is taken as follows:
k= 0.8 for rectangular section having a thickness ?: 300 mm.
k= 0.50 for rectangular sections having a thickness :::; 800 mm.
For rectangular cross sections having thickness ranging between 300-
800 mm, the value of k can be calculated using linear interpolation.
295 296
Table (4.3) Values of Wkmax (mm)
k2 = 81 +82 ............................................ (4.5)
281 Category of One Two Three Four
structure-
Where 81 and 82 are the maximum and minimum strain values, respectively, Table (4.1)
to which the section is subjected. They shall be calculated based on the analysis Wk 0.3 0.2 0.15 0.1
of a cracked section as shown in Fig. 4.3.
•
+ •
•
•
d
t Steel c.g •
a- Strain distribution b- Strain distribution due to c- Strain distribution due to
•
due to axial tension B.M. or eccentric forces
with big eccentricity
eccentric tension with small
eccentricity.
• tcef is the minimum of
- 2.5(Cc +<P/2)
- (t/2)
Fig. 4.3 Values of the factor k2
tcef = 2.5(t-d)
is = stress in longitudinal steel at the tension zone, calculated based on the Beams Element in tension
analysis of cracked section under permanent loads.
isr = Stress in longitudinal steel at the tension zone, calculated based on the
analysis of cracked section due to loads causing first cracking (Mer).
In case of intrinsic imposed deformation, fs may be taken equal to fsr.
Pr = Ratio of effective tension reinforcement.
Slabs
Pr = ::1 ............................................. (4.6)
298
297
4.5.3 Code Related Provisions Table (4.4) Control of cracking for smooth bars by limiting steel stress
under service loads or reduction QJdesign yield stress in steel to (Per Iy)
. . ." "" ."' ·f .". j . ; " , ,
... ' .f:··,::'~'f.;~ .;\-:~.; ., ,... ~ '~I . ~:.'. :~·.tI~.J'~;.~;; ~i~ ~: . ... '" '.
The Egyptian Code permits nit carrying out the calculations of the limit state of
cracking in accordance with Eq. (4.2) if one of the following conditions is met:
conditions.
. . . ';,'< . ... .....f.i
,>~ ~;
Table (4.5) Control of cracking for {Ieformed'bars by limiting steel stress
3- For elements in which tensile steel stress Is under service loads under service loads or reduction or'designyield stress in steel to (Per I y)
are equal to or less than the values given in Tables (4.4) and
(4.5).
fs (N/mm:.!) Reduction factor Category Category Category
4- In case of using limit states design method, it can be considered W.S.D Per (U.L.D) " .
one
. " . , two three &
that the limit state of cracking regarding the stresses in the
four
reinforcing steel is satisfied by mUltiplying the yield strength h
by the factor Perin Tables (4.4) and (4.5). 36/52 40/60 Largest Bar diameter (cj)max) in mm
299 300
4.6 Liquid Containing Structures 4.7 Design Aids for Calculating w k
Liquid containing structures should be designed as non-cracked sections. In The calculation of the factor Wk is complicated and time consuming. Therefore,
these structures the tensile stresses induced by loading should be less than the design curves may be used to reduce the computation time.
value given by the following equation:
The curves were prepared for rectangular sections reinforc~. with deformed
bars and subjected to long term loading that result in, pure bending moment.
fet = [fet(N) +fet(M)] ::; f etr ............................... (4.7)
17 Hence, the factors appeared in Eqs. 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 are evaluated as follows:
where
k t =0.80 --7 deformed bars
fetr= the cracking strength of concrete and is given by:
k2 =0.50 --7 section subjected to simple bending moment
f etr =O.6~ feu .................................................. (4.8) fit =0.80 --7 deformed bars
fi2 =0.50 --7 long term loading
fet(N) = the tensile stresses due to unfactored axial tension force (negative fi = 1.70 --7 cracking due to loads
sign is used for compressive stresses).
The crack width equation can then be expressed as:
fct(M) = tensile stresses due to unfactored bending moment.
'W
k
'=fi S nnsm
B = 1.7 S B
nnsm
.................... (4.10)
The coefficient (17) is determined in accordance with Table (4.6) and it
depends on the "virtual" thickness tv calculated from Eq. 4.9. In which
200
1.00
1.30
s ~ ~(50 +0.25xO.8x0.5x ;, ) ~(50 + 0.25 x ~ (0: -I») ....... (4.11)
The previous equation is a function of tid, the bar diamet~r <I> , and the
400 1.60 reinforcement ratio I!. The values of Sm are given in the Appendix.
Greater than or equal to 600 1.70 An example of such design aids is given in Fig. 4.6.
301 302
, ..
2 2
2 e= nX M /b d X(1-.:i)( '(Mer/bd2 )2]
2 1-0.80xO.5 ••••••••••• (4.23)
b xc /2-n As (d -c) = 0 ..................... (4.13) sm 2x106 xl cr /b d M /bd
Subsisting with c=Ad and !-i =A/b d gives: The previous equation is a function of MId b2, tid, and the reinforcement ratio
1-1-. For each value of the concrete strength !cu, design curves are plotted and
b (.:id)2
nAs (d -.:id) =0 ..................... (4.14) given in the Appendix.
2
2
An example of such curves is given in Fig. 4.6 and the rest are in the
Dividing by bd , substituting with f.ln= (n 1-1-), and solving for A gives: Appendix
.:i=~2!-in +!-in 2 -!-in ................................ (4.15) Take kr =1.7 esm X 104 • Knowing MId b2, tid, and the reinforcement ratiQ 1-1-,
the value of kr is obtained using the design aids. The value of Wk can be
Having determined the neutral axis distance c, the cracked moment of inertia obtained using the following equation:
Ier can be computed as W k =Sm xkr X 10-4 .................................. (4.24)
303 304
Wk factor for sections subjected to bending only
fcu=50 N/mm 2 , t1d=1.05, ribbed bars, n=10 Example 4.1
~'-.
70
Vl'--Q Po2 ~ ~.003 It is required to design the cross-section of a wall comprising a part of an
65 elevated reinforced concrete water tank. The section is subjected to an
. 4• / / /
;o:oQ4
unfactored bending moment of 85 kN.m/m' and an unfactored tension force of
•••••
60
55
/ )7 /
V 110 kN/m'. The material properties are.fcu=30 N/mm~ and/y =360 N/mm2
V
50 / V /
/ Cl={).oos
45
/ / /
/'
/
/' Solution
40 I V
/ / /" ./
0.006
In water containing structures, the Egyptian code requires the satisfaction of
~ 35 II / / ./ . / V ./
0.007
two conditions:
30 I ·V / V /" V ./"
0.008 1- The concrete dimensions of the cross-section must be chosen such that the
tensile stresses developed due to the unfactored straining actions are less
I / V ;7 / /./"'" ~ ~ I~:~~~
/ /' than the tensile strength of concrete.
25
15 v/
/ v/ /:::: ~ ~ :8 ~ ~ ~ ~ .... 0.015 2- The steel reinforcement should be designed to resist the tensile forces
developed at ultimate stage. The stresses developed in the steel
10
/~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --- reinforcement at this stage should not exceed Pcr fy where Per is a factor
o
0.0 0.2 0.4
",
0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0
less than one and depends on the bar diameter.
Bar Diameter
Assuming, t = 550mm
.).1 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 25 28 32
0.001 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 363 400 450 The tensile stresses in the section are' calculated according to the following
0.002 113 125 138 150 163 175 188 206 225 250
0.003 92 100 108 117 125 133 142 154 167 183 equation:
0.004 81 88 94 100 106 113 119 128 138 150
0.005 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 113 120 130
0.006
0.007
71
68
75
71
79
75
83
79
88
82
92
86
96
89
102
95
108
100
117
107
fet = fet(N) + fct(M)~fetrl1J
0.008 66 69 72 75 78 81 84 89 94 100
0.009 84 67 69 72 75 78 81 85 89 94 N
0.010 63 65 68 70 73 75 78 81 85 90 fct(N)=A
0.011 61 84 66 68 70 73 75 78 82 86 c
0.012 60 63 65 67 69 71 73 76 79 83
0.013 60 62 63 65 67 69 71 74 77 81
3
0.014 59 61 63 84 66 68 70 72 75 79
0.015 58 60 62 63 65 67 68 71 73 77 f.ct (N) -- 1000x550
11Ox10 0.20N Imm 2
6M
fet(M) =-2
bt
Fig. 4.6 Example of design curves for calculating the factor Wk
305 306
6 eS =e -t 12 + cover
f. (M)= 6x85x10 =1.69Nlmm 2
et 1000 X550 2 es = 770-550/2+ (25 + 16/2)
2
fct = 0.2 + 1.69 = 1.89 N 1mm es = 528mm
fetr = 0.6~ feu MilS =Nu xes = 154xO.528 = 81.3kN mlm
fctr =0.6.J3Q=3.28Nlmm
2 For h =360 N/mm2, Table 4.5 is used. The value of Pcr for 16 mm diameter bar
can be taken as the average between <jl=12 mm and <jl=18mm.
11 =; factor that is determined from Table (4.6) according to the following
equation: R = 0.85 +0.75 = 080
P cr
1
2
t =tX{1+ fet(N)}
v fct{M)
f,(N/mm") Reduction factor Category Category Category
tv = 550X{1+ 0.20}=615mm
1.69
-17';::1.7 - W.S.D I3cr(u.LD) one two (
'- four
three &
)
36/52 40/60 Largest Bar diameter (CPmax) In mm
2
fetr = 3.28 =1.93N Imm 2 > fet = 1.89N Imm ;: ................Ok. 220 1.00 0.92 18 12
1] 1.7 ' .:_ :" T · · · • -
200 0.93 0.83 22 16 1
......-----.... ....-'-.
Step 2: Cracked section analysis 180 ( 0.85 \ 0.75 25 20 ( 12
)
According to ECP 203, the load factor for liquid containing structures is 1.4 160 '-Q2Y 0.67 32 22 '-.!V
Mu = 1.4x85= 119 kN.mlm Nu =1.4xUO=154kN.mlm 140 0.65 0.58 -- 25 22
d =t-(clearcover+¢12)
120 0.56 0.50 -- -- 28
According to Table 4.1 the structure is classified as class 3. For such a class,
Table 4.2 gives a minimum concrete cover of 25 mm.
bXfcu
517=c j
81.3x10 6
1000 x 30
119
e=- = O.77m = 770mm
CI =9.93 c
-<
d
- (c)
d min
c
take - = 0.125
d
and j =0.826
154
81.3x10 6 154x103
Since e > tl2, the section is subjected to normal force with big eccentricity and
As = + = 1276mm 2 ....... .use7¢16Im
0.80x360xO.826x517 0.80x360/1.15
Mus approach can be used.
307 308
Example 4.2 lOS0x10 6
. 8j4=Cl Cl=4.S1 & j=0.817
A reinforced concrete raft (categorized as category one) of a thickness 900 mm / 1000x30
and is subjected to an un factored bending moment of 700 kN.m/m. The
material properties are!cu=30 N/mm2 and/y =360 N/mm2. . Mu
A, = - - - " - - - -
It is required to design the steel reinforcement to resist the applied moment and . Pcrxfyxjxd
to check the satisfaction of cracking limit state in the Egyptian Code.
For category one structures and deformed bars of diameter 32 mm (decided by
Solution " the designer), the value of Per can be obtained from Table 4-S as 0.7S.
In order to design the steel reinforcement satisfying the limit states of cracking, 6
the Egyptian Code gives two options to the designer: A = lOS0xlO = S640mm 2 Use 7<1>32
s 0.7Sx360xO.817x844
1- Design the steel reinforcement such that the stress developed at the
ultimate stage is Per /y. The reduction in the stresses developed in the steel
is intended to guarantee a limited crack width at service loads. This is a Approach 2
simple straightforward approach that usually leads to uneconomic design This approach is based on designing the steel reinforcement to develop the full
yield strength at ultimate stage and to check cracking status using Eq. 4.2.
2- Design the steel reinforcement such that the stress developed at the
ultimate stage is /y. However, the designer should check the satisfaction of
the Egyptian Code (Eq. 4.2) in order to guarantee a limited crack width at Step 1: Cracked section analysis
service loads. This approach needs an extensive amount of calculations but -Minimum clear cover = 40 mm
usually results in an economic design.
~Ultimate Moment = Ultimate Factor x Bending Moment
Ultimate Moment = 1.Sx700=10S0kN.m
Approach 1
_ The effective depth (d) = total thickness - clear cover - <1>12
As mentioned above, this approach is based on designing the steel
reinforcement based on usable stresses of = Per X fy at the ultimate stage. Assume the use of reinforcing bar of diameter of 32 mm.
-Minimum clear cover =40 mm d =900-40-32/2=844 mm
-Ultimate Moment = Ultimate Factor x Bending Moment
Assuming the factor = 1.S
Ultimate Moment = 1.S x 700 = lOS0 kN .m
- The effective depth (d) = total thickness - clear cover - <1>12
d=C1 - - u
b xfeu Jk
6
Assume the use of reinforcing bars of diameter of 32 mm. From Table (4-S) for 844=Cl lOS0x10 Cl = 4.S1 & j =0.817
1000x30
Category II and assuming ¢= 32 ---7 Pcr = 0.7S
A = __M--'u"---_
d = 900 -40 -32/2 = 844.0mm S fyxjxd
d=C1 Mus 6
bxfcu A = lOS0xlO = 4230mm 2 Use 6<1>32
s 360xO.817x844
309 310
Step 2: Calculation of the value of Wk Step 2.3: Calculation of steel stresses, fs
M
Step 2.1: Calculation of the depth of the neutral axis, c Is =nx-x(d -c)
Ier
The first moment of area of the cross-section about the neutral axis must be 6
c2
1000 x - = lOx (6x804)x (844 -c)
2
Solving quadratic equation for c, c = 241.17 mm.
. N.A.
1000
I..
] fs
• • • • •
As
•
§ N.A.
I· 1000mm
o
o Cracked cross section
0\
As
• • • • • • 6<1> 32 Step 2.4: Calculation of cracking moment, Mer
I dr =0.60xJi:
Step 2.2: Calculation of Icr =0.60x.j30 = 3.286N 1mm 2
I =~Xb xt 3
g 12
311 312
Step 2.5: Calculation of steel stress fsr Step 2.7: Check the value of Wk
For n=1O, c= 241.17 mm, Icr = 22.21 X 109 mm4 Wk =/3.s rm'C sm
M
isr =nx-E-x(d -c)
Ier
Snn =(50+0.25k) k2 : )
=lOX443.7XlO: x(844.0-241.17)= 120.44N /mm 2
22.21xlO
Srm =(50+0.25XO.80XO.50X~)
0.0345
S,m = 142.75
Step 2.6: Calculation of P r
As
Pr=~
eef
313 314
Example 4.3
Wk factor for sections subiected to bending only
It is required to calculate the factor Wk for the raft given in example 4.2 fcu=30 N/mm2, tld=1.05, ribbed bars, n=10
(Approach 2) using the design aids given in the Appendix. 70
I~o.oo
Solution 65 V' '.003
11=( 1.004
60 ~ / -/ /
Step1: Calculate curve parameters -tf:',,-,~,:
55
J / /'
/
d = 900-40- 32 = 844 mm !..- = 900 = 1.066 50
/ / ./ ,/
~ 0.005
2 d 844
45 / / / /'
The computed reinforcement from example 4.2 (Approach 2) is 6<1>32
40
/ / / ./ ./
lO.006
~
6
M 700 x 10 = 0.983 5
b xd 2 = 1000 x 844
0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 L6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0
Since no chart is available for (t1d=1.066), interpolation should be made
2
Mlbd
between the charts available (t1d=1.05 and t1d=1.15), (refer to Fig. EX 4.3
given below). Using charts with t1d=1.05 gives kr = 13.7, and t1d=1.15 gives kr
Values ofS m
= 12.6. Interpolating, one gets kr = 13.5.
,.,
--
Bar Diameter
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 25 28 ( 32 J
Step 2.2: Determine Sm u
0.001 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 363 400
0.002 113 125 138 150 163 175 188 206 225 210
Using the previous design charts. 0.003 92 100 108 117 125 133 142 154 167 113
...... 04 81 88 94 100 106 113 119 128 138 120
For t1d=1.05 ~ Sm = 120, and for t1d=1.15 ~ Sm = 260. ( 0.005 '.75 RO R5 90 95 100 05 13 12 r 130
)-+,
0.006 ./ 71 75 79 83 88 92 96 102 loll"\" 117
Interpolating, one gets Sm =142, (refer to Fig. EX 4.3). . 7 68 71 75 79 82 86 89
84
95
89
100
94
1UT
100
0.008 66 69 72 75 78 .81
0.009 64 67 69 72 75 78 81 85 89 94
Step 2.3: Calculate the factor Wk 0.Q10
0.011
63
61
65
64
68
66
70
68
73
70
75
73
78
75
81
78
85
82
90
86
0.012 60 63 65 67 69 71 73 76 79 83
W k = kr xS m xlO-4 0.Q13 60 62 63 65 67 69 71 74 77 81
0.014 59 61 63 64 66 68 70 72 75 79
0.Q15 58 60 62 63 65 67 68 71 73 77
W k = 13.5x142x10-4 = 0.192 rom -
The systematic application of Eq. (4.2) results in w,FO.193 IDIll. Such a close W k =Sm xkr xlO- 4
agreement with the value obtained from the use of the design aids confirms their
accuracy. . Fig. EX 4.3 Using design curves for Wk factor
315 316
Example 4.4 t
es ! =--e-cover
2
The critical cross section of a reinforced concrete member that is a part of a
Assuming the cover = 40 mm
structure with unprotected tension side (categorized as category II) is subjected
to an unfactored bending moment of 100 kN.m and an unfactored tension force ~s! =450-250-40 = 160mm
of 400 kN. The concrete dimensions of the member (b x t) are (350 mm x 900
mm). It is required to design the steel reinforcement of the section satisfying t
e.\·2 =2"+e-cover
the requirements of the limit states of cracking in of the Egyptian Code. The
material properties are!cu=25 N/mm2 and/y =360 N/mm2. .
es2 =450+250-40 = 660mm
Solution Nu xe s2 l(fJ I I s)
As! = d-d' cr y Y
In order to design the steel reinforcement satisfying the limit states of cracking,
the Egyptian Code gives two options to the designer:
From Table (4-5), for Category II and assuming ¢J= 22 --7 Pcr = 0.75
1- Design the steel reinforcement such that the stress developed at the
ultimate stage are Pcr /y. The reduction in the stresses developed in the 3
steel is intended to guarantee a limited crack width at service loads. This A = 600x10 x660 1(0.75x360/1.15)=2057mm 2 ••••••••••• Use 6<1l22
is a simple straightforward approach that usually leads to uneconomic sl 860-40 .
design.
2- Design the steel reinforcement such that the stress developed at the A.v2 = Nu xes! l(fJ
d _ d' cr x I y I Ys )
ultimate stage is h . However, the designer should check the satisfaction
of Eq. 4.2 in order to guarantee a limited crack width at service loads. From Table (4-5), for Category II and assuming ¢J= 12 --7 Per = 1.00
This approach needs an extensive amount of calculations but usually 600x103 x 1 6 0 · 2
results in economic design. A = 1(1.0x360/1.15)=374mm ......... Use 4<1l12
s2 860-40
Approach 2
Approach 1
This approach is based on designing the steel reinforcement to develop the
As mentioned above, this approach is based on designing the steel yield strength at ultimate stage and to check cracking status using Eq. 4.2.
reinforcement based on usable stresses of Pcrl y at the ultimate stage.
Step 1: Cracked section analysis
Cross-section of beam = 350 mm x 900 mm
N u = 1.5 x 400 = 600 kN Cross-section of beam = 350 x 900 mm
Mu
e= __
M u = 1.5 x 100 = 150 kN.m
Nu
150 t . . c
e = - - = 0.25m =250mm < - = 450mm .................eccentrIc tenslOn lorce
600 2
e = 150 = 0.25m =250mm < ~ = 450mm ......... small eccentric tension force
600 2
317 318
r'
Step 2: Calculation of Wk
• • • • 4<1> 12
Step 2.1 Calc~lation of the steel stress f s
~
Nxe s2
fs! d -d' 1 As!
o
o
0'1 3
400.0 X 10 x 660 11520 = 211.8N 1 mm 2
As 860-40
• • • • 4<1>22
-- . . .. fs2
S
t S
es! = --e-cover 0
0
2 0\
t . 1350 mml
es 2 =-+e-cover
2
es2 =450+250-40 = 660mm
Step 2.2: Calculation of steel stress f sr
A = N U xeS2/ (f 1 )
In order to find the steel stress I str ' one has to calculate the combination Mer
s! d -d' Y Ys
and Ncr that result in first cracking of the section. It should be clear that one
600.0 X 103 x660 2
has to assume that the eccentricity of the tension force will be unchanged
ASl = 860-40 1(360/1.15) = 1543mm ........... Use 4¢22
during the history of loading.
A xes! I(f 1
$2 = Nu
d -d' Y Y.,,)
fetr =0.60x~feu 11]
3
As2 = 600.0x10 x160.0 1(360/1.15) = 374mm 2 ••••••••. Use 4¢12
860-40 fetr = 0.60x.J25/1.7 = 1.76N Imm 2
1 6xe
fdr =Ncr(-b- + - b
2)
xt xt
319 320
1.76 = Ncr X10 3 ( 1 + 6x250 ) "I = -660
x 0.00156 = 0.00643
160
350x900 350x900 2
Ncr = 207.9kN
k2 0.00643 +0.00156 = 0.621
2xO.00643
Ncr xe s2 1A
d -d' .sl
3 --
f sr = 207.90 x 10 x660 11520.0 = 1l0.lN 1mm 2 • • • • £2
860-40
£1
-'--
•••• \
= 2.5x(clearcover+¢12)
tee]
I?50 II1D11
tee] = 2.5 X(30 + 22/2) = 102.5 mm
1520.0 = 0.042
Pejf 350x102.5 Step 2.5: Check the value of Wk
Assuming
321 322
(l-P,A(;: n
E,. {
Note;
It can be noted that the calculations needed in Approach 2 are lengthy and
cumbersome. However, it results in economic design when compared to
Approach 1 as noted in the amount of steel reinforcement resulted from each
design.
5.1 Introduction
The main purpose of footings and other foundation systems is to transfer
column loads safely to the soil. Since, the soil bearing capacity is much lower
than the concrete columns; the loads need to be transferred safely to the soil by
using larger areas usually called shallow foundations. If the soil has low
bearing capacity, or the applied loads are very large, it may be necessary to
transfer the load to a deeper soil through the use of piles or caissons usually
called deep foundations.
324
323
Foundation design requires both a soil investigation; to detennine the most
suitable type of foundation, and a structural design; to establish the depth and
reinforcement of the different foundation elements. It is customary for the
geotechnical engineers to carry out the soil investigation, and propose the best
foundation system that fits a particular location. It is the responsibility of the column
structural engineer to establish the size and amount of reinforcement for each
component of the proposed foundation system.
This chapter addresses the structural design of shallow foundations and piled
RC footin
foundations. Traditional analysis and design procedures are explained. The
chapter also explains the use of the finite element method for the analysis and PC footing
design of complicated foundation systems such as shallow rafts and rafts on
piles. (a) Wall footing (b)Isoiated footing
5.2 Types of Foundations
The choice of a particular type of foundation depends on a number of factors,
such as the soil beating capacity, the water table, the magnitude of the loads exterior interior
column column
:lJ:~:=n=S~=tra{'; :.~,:?eam_~7==C=Ol~
that needs to be transferred to the soil, and site constraints such as the existence
of a property line.
....
Generally, foundations may be classified as follows: RC footin o
325 326
Applied
load 5.3 Soil Pressure under concentrically Loaded
Footings
The actual bearing soil pressure differs significantly according to the type of
soil, stiffness of the footing and loading conditions. In general, the distribution
under the base of the footing is non-uniform. Assuming the loading is
:. :.:.:.:;:.:;:.:;:.:;:.:;:.:;:.:;:.:;:.:(:; I'~:~))'~:~'))~:?~ concentric and the footing is rigid, the soil pressure distribution under sandy
:: :::
:.:/.:.: Pile cap
soil (cohesionless soil) may take the parabolic shape shown in Fig. 5.2a. The
part of the soil under the column is likely to be pressured more than the part at
B?':::':::' ~:~:~:
:.:.:. the edges. The soil particles near the edges escapes from under the footing
:' ~:~:~':':':':':' providing less support and producing less pressure. In contrast, in a clayey soil
(cohesive soil), the stresses near the edges are larger than those at the middle as
shown in Fig. 5.2b. This is attributed to the shear stresses developed near the
unloaded portion (surrounding the footing) of the soil near the edges. This
additional support results in producing high stresses near the edge than those
developed at the center of the footing.
r
:.: In addition to the variation of soil distribution under different types of soils, the
stiffness of the footing itself adds more complexity to the problem. For design
purposes, the bearing soil distribution is assumed uniform regardless of the
type of soil or the stiffness of the footing as shown in Fig. 5.2c. The
assumption of uniform pressure simplifies the calculation of the acting forces
and speeds up the design process. Experimental tests and the performance of
the existing buildings indicate that this assumption results in conservative
Section designs.
:--,
..... ......
:- .....
.... ......
:- Piles
0 :-",
..... Pile cap
"
column
....
• 0
....
:-", ....
:-". ....
:-",
Plan
(0 Pile foundation
I I Where P and M are the unfactored axial load and moment, respectively, and y
is the distance from the c.g ofthefooting.
RC footing
For rectangular footings (Lxb) in which A = b xL, I =b X L3 112
and y = Ll2, the previous equation may be written in the following form
RCfooting
II valid when no tensile stresses are developed. This is because tensile stresses
cannot be transmitted between the soil and the concrete, and redistribution of
stresses should occur. For a rectangular footing of length L, if the eccentricity
e exceeds U6, a triangular stress distribution will develop over part of the base
as shown in Fig. 5.3c. For equilibrium to occur, the centroid of the soil pres~ure
must coincide with the applied load Pu• If we denote the distance from the
applied load Pu to the footing edge a, then the length of the base on which the
triangular stress distribution developed is 3a. Applying the equilibrium
equation gives:
c- Assumed uniform pressure
I
-lmaxxbx(3a)=Pu ...................................... (5.4)
Fig. 5.2 Soil pressure distribution under footings. 2
329 330
p
L L
Where-+e +a = L or a =--e
2 2
PC footin_W:i;;;;:;:~;;;;;;:;:~==""':.:.:w;.a Elevation
The maximum developed pressure fmax should not exceed the soil bearing
capacity. The assumed pressure distribution is expected to deviate from the
reality because of the non linear stress-strain relationship of the soil. The
bI ,. -..-..-_.------'-----'
amount of deviation increases as the amount of eccentricity increases.
However, experience over the years showed that this simplified analysis gives
a safe design. -i.. -··-··-··- '-"-"-
Footings subjected to high moments tend to tilt and undesirable differential ----.--------_ Plan
settlement develops. Therefore, it is recommended to minimize the eccentricity L
of the applied load as much as possible.
In some other cases the footing may be subjected to eccentricities in both
directions. This produces biaxial moments on the footing. Only one comer
point is subjected to the maximum stress. The soil stresses may be obtained
using the stress equation as follows: ,./////////////.//./////h.
'l////////////////////'
"//////////.///////////,
'/////////////////////~
_ P Mx My
fmax - - ± - y+-x ............................... (5.6)
min A Ix Iy
Hand calculations of such problems are difficult, and computer programs are
usually used to determine soil distribution and the acting forces.
a)small eccentricity e ::;; Ll6
Solution 2080kN
I
For a concentrically applied load (e=O), the soil pressure simply equals the load I
over the area of the footing.
I,:
f =~= 2080 =203.92 kN 1m 2
A 3.4X3.0 95.96 kN/m2 L !
Since the applied r,ressure (203.92 kN/m2) is less than the allowable soil
pressure (320 kN/m ), the footing is considered safe.
- 11. 88 kN/nl
P=2080kN
f=203.92 kN/m 2
333 334
5.5 Gross and Net Soil Pressures
Case c
The soil pressure may be expressed in terms of gross or net pressure at the
Si?ce e = 0.8 ~ > U6 = 0.567m, the soil bearing pressure can be obtained foundation level. The gross soil pressure is the total soil pressure produced by
usmg the followmg equation: ail loads above the foundation level. These loads consist of (a) the service
L 3.4 column load at the ground surface, (b) the weight of the plain and reinforced
a="2-e = 2 - 0 .8 =0.9 m concrete footings, and (c) the weight of the soil from the foundation level to the
ground level. On the other hand, the net soil pressure does not include either
f 2Pu 2x2080 2 the weight of the soil above the base of the footing or the weight of the footing.
max =-3-x-a"--Xb- = 3xO.9x3 = 513.58 kN/m It can be simply obtained by subtracting from the gross soil pressure the weight
of I-m square of soil with a height from the foundation level to the ground
Since the m~imum applied pres~ure (fmax=513.58 kN/m 2 ) is larger than the
allowable sod pressure (320 kN/m ), the footing is considered unsafe. level.
If a concrete footing is located at the foundation level without any column load
as shown in Fig. 5.4a, the total downward pressure from the footing and the
20S0kN soil above is 51 kN/m 2 . This is balanced by an equal and opposite (upward)
soil pressure of 51 kN/m 2 • Therefore, the net effect on the footing is zero and
O.S 0.9
neither moments nor shear develops in the footing.
When the column load column is applied, the pressure under the footing is
- r-
increased by 120 kN/m 2 as illustrated in Fig. 5.4b. Thus the total pressure on
the soil becomes 171 kN/m2 • This is the gross soil pressure and must not
exceed the· allowable soil pressure qallowable. When the bending moments and
~ shear forces are computed, the upward pressure and downward pressure of2 51
I
kN/m 2 cancel each other leaving only the net soil pressure of 120 kN/m to
produce the internal straining actions on the footing as shown in Fig. 5.4c.
~'- In design, the area of the footing is chosen such that the applied gross 'pressure
does not exceed the allowable soil pressure. The net soil pressure is used to
~
' -............ 513.58 kN/m2
calculate the reinforcement and to check the shear strength of the footing. The
3a =2.7m I area of the plain concrete footing is calculated as follows:
1
Area = Pgross(column 1000+ jooting+soil) ............................... (5 .7)
qallowable
The pervious equation can be further simplified by assuming the weight of the
footing and the soil above is about 5%-10% of the column load. Assuming this
ratio to be 10% the area of the footing can be obtained using Eq. 5.8 as follows:
336
335
load=O t Example 5.2
soil wei ht
For the footing shown in the figure below, calculate the gross and the net soil
pressures at the base of the footing. The densities of the plain concrete, the
reinforced concrete and the soil may be taken as 22 leN/m3 , 25 kN/m 3 , and
o s?il= 18 kN/m 3 , respectively.
\0
d
PDL= 820 kN
51 kN/m2 P LL= 350 kN
a) Self weight and soil weight
load=1080 kN G.L=zero -
"" '"
.." A 3x3
llll!illll~l:~l'jl:il!illl! I ;mm;:;'im"~~~::~i
! ---RC (2.1 x2.1 x 0.4)
F.L -2.0 _ _ PC (2.6 x2.6 x 0.3)
~~~ ><~ I j15+120=135 kN/m
2 I I I I I I I I I I
I
qgro",,= 36+15+120=171 kN/m2
Solution
The total loads above the foundation level are calculated as follows:
1. Column load 820 + 350 = 1170 kN
b) Gross soil pressure
2. weight of the PC footing 22 x 2.6 x 2.6 x 0.3 = 44.6 kN
load=1080 kN 3. weight of the RC footing 25 x 2.1x 2.1 x 0.4 = 44.1 kN
4. weight of the Soil 18x2.1x2.1x1.3=103.19 kN
P 1080
q =-=--=120 kNlm 2
..,' A 3x3
..........
..........
......... ..
.......... ~Olal =1170+44.6+44.1+103.19=1361.91 kN
......... ......
.........
..........
..........
.........
The gross soil pressure equals:
1/1111111111111111111
o
\0
f gross = p = 1361.91 = 201.46 kN 1m2
d A 2.6 x 2.6
The added (net) soil pressure (due to adding the footing and column load)
2
qnel=120 kN/m 2
f""1 = fgross -weight of 2m of soil = 201.466 -18x 2 = 165.466 kN 1m
c) Net soil pressure
Fig. 5.4 Gross and net soil bearing pressureS.
337 338
5.6 Design of Isolated Footings 5.6.2 Design Steps
5.6.1 Introduction . Step 1: Dimensioning of the Plain Concrete Footing
The design of the isolated footings must consider bending, development of the The plain concrete footing size is computed suing the allowable soil
reinforcement, one-way shear and punching shear. Since shear reinforcement is pressure. It is customary to assume that the weight of the soil and the
not permitted by the ECP 203 for one-way shear and two-way shear. footing equal to 5-10% of the column lo~d. The loads used in the
Accordingly, shear rather the bending moment normally controls the depth of calculations are the working loads (unfactored). Thus, the area of the
the footing. plain concrete footing (A) equals:
One-way shear reinforcement is not allowed in the footings because (1)
determining of the effective pattern of shear reinforcement is difficult to A = 1.1x(PDL +FLL ) •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• (5.9a)
establish when the footing is bending in two directions, and (2) the depth of the Qo1lowable
compression zone may be not sufficient to anchor the shear reinforcement that The dimensions of the footing are chosen such that an equal amount is
is intended to reach the yielding stress at failure. projecting all around the column. Referring to Fig. 5.5, the dimensions
Punching shear reinforcement (two-way shear) is permitted by some of the footing are taken as
international codes. Because of the difficulty of placing such reinforcement, the LxB = LX[L+(bc -aJ]= A .............................. (5.9b)
Egyptian Code insists in depending on concrete only in resisting two-way
shear. Dimensioning the footing in such a way will ensure producing the same
bending moment in all· four sides. Thus, the reinforcement in the
The soil pressure causes the footing to deflect upward, producing tension in
reinforced concrete footing will approximately be equal in both
two directions at its bottom fibers. Therefore the reinforcement is placed at its
directions.
bottom of the footing in two perpendicular directions without the need of top
reinforcement. The thickness of the plain concrete footing is usually assumed from
250-500 mm depending on the soil type and the magnitude of the
It is common in Egypt to construct a plain concrete footing above which a
applied loads.
reinforced concrete footing of smaller dimensions is resting. Such an
arrangement proves to be more economical than using a reinforced concrete
footing resting directly on soil.
E: a" RC footing
--;:;
.
':I
..t:>" - :--
-II- PC footing
I
'--
+
...:J .D
II
l:q
- l-
m m
J l
I I
E:
6(Pa x /2)
2 (X)2
30.0 1.47 1.31 1.20 . 1.11 1.04 0.98 0.93 0.85
:::;0.6 JJ:: 11]
6M
J CI =JCI(M) =--2-= 2=3.0 Pa -
bt 1xt t
The thickness of the reinforced concrete footing should not be less than 300
Where Pa is the allowable soil pressure and 11 is a coefficient that depends mm or the smallest column dimension which ever is greater.
on the thickness (can be assumed=1.7) and t is the thickness of the plain
concrete footing obtained from step 1.
The previous equation can be solved to obtain the distance x. A factor of
Step 3: Design for Punching Shear
safety of 3 applied to the allowable tensile strength of concrete is assumed The factored pressure qsu at the bottom of the reinforced concrete
- to obtain the values listed in Table 5.1. Knowing!cu and the allowable soil footing is obtained using the factored load as follows:
pressure, one can get the value of xlt from table 5.1 and hence x is known.
q = Pu = 1.4PDL + 1.6 PLL ••••••••••••••••••••••• (5.10)
su ArxB r ArxB r
Punching shear failure is referred as two-way shear. In the ECP 203, the
Critical section for critical perimeter for punching shear is at a distance d/2 from the face
plain concrete footing
of the column as shown in Fig 5.7. The critical shear perimeter is given
x by
341 342
r
Step 4: Design for One-Way Shear
·1
According to the ECP 203, the critical section for one-way shear is at
I; dl2 from the face of the column as shown in Fig. 5.8. The shear stress
developed in the footing is obtained from the factored soil pressure.
Referring to Fig. 5.8, the total shear force at sec 1-1 equals:
I
I a
Qu =qsu ·(A r -2)'B r ............................... (5.15)
!
1 The corresponding shear stress is calculated as follows:
Q .
qu = _u_ .. ~ ........................................... (5.16)
Brxd
dJ2
Since punching shear reinforcement is not allowed by the ECP 203, the
developed shear qup should be less than concrete strength qcu given by
the least of the following three values:
Critical section
for shear
1. qcuP =0.316 !,cu ::;1.6N Imm 2 .......................... (S.14a)
rc .
2. qcuP = 0.316 (O.SO+~) !,cu ............................ (S.14b) Critical sectiot).
b rc for shear
343 344
Step 5: Design for Flexure Column reinforcement should be well anchored in the footing using column
dowels. The length of these dowels inside the column should not be less than
The ultimate soil pressure induces moment into two perpendicular 40 the largest bar diameter as shown in Fig. 5.10.
directions. Frequently, the minimum reinforcement requirement
controls the design.
The critical section for moment is taken at the face of the column. A 1m Long direction rft
Short direction rft.
strip is usually used to calculate the reinforcement per meter. Referring
to Fig. 5.9, the moment per meter equals
Plain concrete
/fOOting
-
s::
4fi
j. (Ar-ac)/2 • I~c'I' (Ar-ac)/2 .j critical section ~
I
bJl
--,---- bending s::
.£
s::
...... Reinforced concrete
¢:l
~
footing
I~ ,. L
"·1
Area considered Fig. 5.10 Typical reinforcement and dimensions of isolated footings
for moment
1796 == 274 kN 1m 2
llc=0.25 qsu = A xB 2.3x2.85
m r r
ti
t::!
"
I
-00 f--
-i l- Assuming that the thickness of the RC footing is 0.55 m, the chosen
dimensions are (2.3 x 2.85 x 0.55 ms).
I
...\:)
'-
~
+ c:i
II
II ~
I:Q - I-
m m
m
II
I I
Reinforced concrete
footing
Plain concrete
footing
L
.j
347 348
rI
Step 3: Design for punching shear 1
\
q
cup
=0.316 (0.50+ aC )
be
~fcuY =0.316 (0.50+ 0.25)
0.8
{30 =1.15 N
VLs Imm
2
c
a = ac + d = 250 + 480 = 730mm qcup= 1.15 N/mm2
Since the applied shear stress (0.798) is less than concrete shear strength (1.15)
b =bc +d =800+480 = 1280mm
, the footing is considered safe
U = 2 (a+b) = 2 (730+1280) =4020 mm Step 4: Design for one-way shear
The critical section for one-way shear. is taken at dl2 from the face of the
column as shown in figure.
a = 0.25+d 12+d 12 = 0.25+d = 0.25+0.48 = 0.73 m .
250
Punching area
H f = Ar -a = 2.3-0.73 = 0.785 m
2 2
~I 0
~
00
N
......
d/2=0.24 column
* - - - - 250x800 mm
td=0.48
730
I· ·1
critical section
for shear
The punching load =column load - the load acting on the punching area
Qup =Pu -qsu (axb) =1796-274 (0.73 x 1.28) =1540 kN
quP
=~= 1540xIOOO =0.798 N
U xd 4020 x 480
Imm 2
The concrete strength for punching is the least of the three values I
qcup=0.316~fcu =0.316~30 =1.41Nlmm 2
Yc 1.5
2.3
I- ·1
349 350
T
Qu = qsu . l.B r = 274 x 0.785 x 2.85 = 613 kN
Step 5.3: Check the development of the reinforcement
=~= 613xlO00 =0.45 N Imm 2 For simplicity, the values listed in the Egyptian code to determine the
qu b xd 2850x480 development length is used. For high grade steel without hooks the
M u 1m' =qsu (Ar _a~)2 x 1.0= 274 (2.3- °.25)2 = 143.93 kN.m 1m'
8
6
R = Mu = 143.93 X 10 = 0.021
leu xb xd 2 30x 1000 x 480 2 .
I, t=5;r
From the chart with R=0.021, the reinforcement index m=O.0245
I 30
II t=38=
As =(J)x~xbxd =0.0245x-x1000x480=980mm 2
Iy 360 Plam
. concrete
) Vfooting
0.60 0.60
As woo =--xbxd =--x1000x480=800 mm <As
2 -
. Iy 0 360 .
As=980 mm2 ~
I
2 o .....
\0
Use 5cI>16/m' (1000 mm ) I(")
00 eo
I(")
M
Step 5.2: Reinforcement in the long direction Reinforced
concrete footin g
The critical section is at the face of the column, and taking a strip of 1m
3000
351 352
5.7 Combined Footings
IF-----~---m-II IF-----~---m11
Combined footings are used when either one of the columns falls on a property
line or when the two columns are close to each other such that the footings
overlaps. The geometry of the footing is chosen such that the resultant of the
two columns coincides with the centroid of the footing. This can be achieved
by using trapezoidal footing (Fig. 5.l1a) or by adjusting the center of the c)Rectangular combined footing d)Rectangular combined footing
footing at the resultant as shown in Fig. 5.l1b. The resulting pressure is with PC base with PC base and T-beam
uniform under the footings and help to prevent differential settlement. It is
common to place the reinforced concrete footing above a plain concrete footing
to reduce cost as shown in Fig. 5.11c. In some cases the resulting moments
between the columns may become large and it may be economical to use an
inverted T-beam to increase the effective depth and reduce the reinforcement
as shown in Fig. 5.Ud. Fig. 5.11 Type of combined footings (cont.)
The basic assumption for the design of a combined footing is to assume that the
In combined footings, soil pressure is resisted by a series of strips running in
footing is rigid and is subjected to a linear soil pressure. In actual practice, it
the longitudinal direction as shown in Fig 5.12. The load is then transmitted to
requires very big thickness to make rigid footing. However, the assumption of
the cross beams AB and CD, which transmit the pressure to the columns. The
rigid footing has been used successfully over the years. The combined footing
cross (hidden) beams are assumed to extend dl2 from the face of the column.
can be designed as beam on elastic foundation that usually leads to more
The main top longitudinal reinforcement is placed between the two columns,
economic solutions. However, this method is time consuming and is not
while the main bottom longitudinal reinforcement is placed under the columns.
suitable for design office calculations.
Main transverse reinforcement is placed at the bottom at locations of the cross
beams.
.-.-.-.-.-.~.~.-. dI2
Property line
Resultant
Low load High load
cracks
353 354
It is customary in Egypt to construct reinforced concrete footings on top of
plain concrete footings mainly for economical reasons as shown in Fig. 5.13a.
Example 5.4: Combined footing with PC
However, it is also popular around the world to use reinforced concrete Design a combined footing to support the two columns shown in Fig. EX 5.4.
footings directly resting on soil after providing a thin layer of plain concrete Column C} has a cross section of (0.3 m x 0.4 m) and supports a working load
(100 mm) for leveling as shown in Fig. 5.13b. Such a design approach is also of 1320 kN. Column C2 has a cross section of (0.3 m x 0.7 m) and supports a
adopted in Egypt in some few projects. working load of 1960 kN. Assume that the allowable soil pressure2 is 175
kN/m2, and the material properties arefcu=25 N/mm2, andfy=400 N/mm .
The analysis is carried out in a similar manner to that to that explained before
with the exception of ignoring any contribution of the plain concrete.
Therefore, the dimensions of the reinforced concrete footing should be chosen
OAm
~
lo.7m
4 •
I
I I
to distribute the applied loads safely to the soil. 0.3 mI • .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.•. To.3 m
l C1 i C2
/( pilnf'...·rPfl concrete footing
- - - - - - - S=3.6 m - - - - - - -
Solution
1---- L
Step 1: Dimensions of the plain concrete footing
Plain conCrete The location of the resultant force is determined by taking moments of all
forces about any point. Taking moment about the c.g. of column Cl, one gets:
(300-600 mm) (100 mm-J50 mm)
3280kN
Fig. 5.13 Reinforced concrete combined footings with or I-t---- xr=2.15 ---1---- 1.45
without plain concrete footings
3.0 3.0 ·1
355 356
PC2 xS = 1960x(3.6) = 2.1S m
r
PCI +PC2 (1320+1960) I Step 2: Dimensions of the reinforced concrete footing
To ensure that a unifonn pressure is acting under the reinforced concrete
To ensure unifonn pressure throughout the footing, the centroid of the footing j footing, the centroid of the footing must coincide with the resultant. Assume
, that the distance x = thickness of the plain concrete = 0.4 m.
must coincide with the resultant. Assume that the length of the footing is L.
I LI =L-2x =6-2x0.4=5.2m
L = 2x r + thickness of C1I2 + thickness of C2/2 + (1- 2m) "" 6.0m
The width of the footing is determined from the allowable soil pressure. Bl =B -2x =3.4S-2x0.4 = 2.65 m
Assuming that the weight of the footing is about 10% of the total applied loads, I Assume the thickness of the RC footing is 0.8 m. Hence, the dimensions of the
the width of the footing equals:
RC footing are (5.2 m x 2.65 m x 0.8 m).
B = 1.1 (PCI + PC2 ) 1.1 x (1320 + 1960) = 3.44 m The ultimate pressure is used to calculate the moments and shear forces.
ami xL 17Sx6 Assuming that the live loads are less than 75% of the dead loads (the usual
case), the ultimate loads equal:
Rounding B to the nearest 50 mm B=3.45 m.
PU(CI) = 1.5xP = l.Sx1320 = 1980 kN
The plain concrete footing dimensions are (6.0 m X 3.45m) and its thickness is
assumed 400 mm.
Pu (C2) = 1.5xP =1.5x1960 = 2940 kN
1.1 (1320 + 1960) 2
The pressure (aact)= =174.3kN 1m <175 ...... .o.k
6.0 x 3.45
~~-.----------------~- ~om------------------~I
Pcl=1320 Resultant
=3280kN Pc2=1960 f.4 I 5.2
0
1 .4
U2=3.0m 3.0m
""l-
I! .-~ e:)
--
~----------,------.----~
Dr I
O.4
l :!'
: iI : ~!
J
i!
!.
2.15m
.
!
-
.
i
i
i
3·f5m
i
,
,,
O.4m
1--:--1
_.- .~.---.-.-.-.-.---.-.-.-.-.---.---
10.7m I
-• , •
,,
•.
--- -
;,-- - - - - - - S = 3 . 6 m - - - - - - - ,
! 0.85! 36 - 1.55 m 1
, :
I.' -:-
:
~:'om -I J :
I
357 358
1980kN 2940kN
Step 3: Design the footing for flexure : - - - - - - - 3.6m --------'1
1
( -)
Bending
Moment
-£i~
xo=2.09
--1------.-,.
1-1_ .
,Q)
8
,N
I'+-<
,0
', .....
,~ .....
,0 Critical
,0..
,, 1851.9
1
·425.8
Shear
Force
359 360
The calculation of the shear and moment may become tedious; therefore a
computer program was used to generate the straining actions at different points Design the section of maximum negative bending moment
as shown in the table below. Plots of the shear and moment are also given in the The section of maximum negative bending moment requires top reinforcement.
following figure. Since the maximum moment is calculated for the full width of the footing, its
value shall be divided by the footing width to get the moment per meter.
Program Foundation: output file: combined
M 1m' = M max = 1180.8 == 446 kN.m 1m'
max Bl 2.65
Location Shear Moment Notes
(x)(m) kN kN.m Assume the effective depth d =t -.70mm =800-70=730 mm
0.00 0 0 6
446 X 10 = 0.0335
0.25 236.5 29.6 face of left column 25 x 1000 x 7~02 .
0.45 425.8 95.8 C.L. of left column
From the chart with R=0.0335, the reinforcement index 0)::0.040
0.45 -1554.2 95.8 C.L. of left column
0.65 -1365.0 -196.1 face of left column As = OJxfcu xb xd = 0.040 x 25 x1000x730= 1825 mm 2 1m'
fy 400
1.00 -1033.8 -615.9
Asmin = 0.6 xb xd = 0.6 x1000x730 = 1095 mm 2 1m'
1.50 -560.8 -1014.6 fy 400 .
2.09 0.0 -1180.8 point of zero shear, Mmax 2
Asmin =1095 rnrn
2.50 385.4 -1102.3 Use 6<P20/m' (1885 mm2/m')
3.00 858.5 -791.3 Secondary bottom reinforcement in the transversal direction should be provided
3.70 1520.8 41.4 face of right column with an area of at least 20% of the main reinforcement. Therefore, provide
5<P12/m' .
4.05 1851.9 631.6 C.L. of right column
Design the section of the maximum positive bending moment
4.05 -1088.1 631.6 C.L. of right column
The section of maximum positive bending moment requires bottom
4.40 -756.9 302.6 face of right column reinforcement. The critical section for the maximum positive bending is at the
5.20 0.0 0 face of the right support.
08 2
M = 946.15x-·- = 302.8kN.m (Refer also to the output table)
To determine the maximum moment, the point of zero shear force is calculated 2
as follows:
M 1m' = M = 302.8 = 114.25 kN.m 1m'
946.15x 0 -1980 = 0 Bl 2.65
6
xo=2.093 m 114.25 X 10 =0.0086
Thus, the value of the maximum moment equals: 25xl000x7302
Since the intersection point is below the chart, the factor ro can be
M max = 946.15 X 2.0932 12-1980x(2.093-0.45) = 1180.8 kN.m
approximately evaluated as OJ == 1.2 R = 0.0103.
361 362
The calculations of the reinforcement are summarized in the following table
_feu b X d = 001
A s -wx-x 25 .
. 03x-xI000x730=471 tnm 2 1m'
fy 400 C2
Item Cl
0.60 b 0.60
A smin =--x xd =--xI000x730=1095mm 2 Im' LoadPu, kN 1980 2940
fy 400
pressure f ' = Pu 12.65 747.17 -1109.43
Use 6cI>16/m' (1206 ~/m')
M=f'x;/2 515.8 765.856
Step 3.2: Design of the footing for flexure (transversal)
d(mm) 710 710
!o ?~tain the pressure if) under each cross-beam (hidden beam), column load
IS dlVlded by the footing width (2.65 m). The breadth of the cross beam (be) is be(mm) 0.71 = 0.7 + 0.71 + 0.71 = 1.41
= 0.25 + 0.4 + - = 1.005 2
~ss~medat d/2 ~r?m the column face (in the perpendicular direction) as shown 2 2
m fIgure. The cntlcal section for moment is at the face of the support.
T~e transverse bottom reinforcement is placed on the top of the longitudinal Mu 0.043
R= 2
0.041
remforcement, thus the effective depth is=730-20=710 mm feu be d
1980 kN 2940 kN 0.0522
OJ 0.0492
I. 2.65m
,I I. 2.65m
,I Step 4: Design for shear
The critical section for shear is at dl2 from the face of the column. Referring to
Cl Transversal section C2
the shear force diagram and the computer output table, the maximum shear at
the face of column C2 is (1520.8 kN). Hence, at a distance of dl2 from the left
O.4m a---0.7m face of the support Qu equals:
:,
,
,:
,(~) = 1520.8 -946.15 (0;3) = 1176kN
............
, " j : "" :: Qu =Q -f
AsI
• • • • -i •
'i
•
l'i- • •As2• • -i-
'1
This shearing force is resisted by the full width of the footing (B=2650 mm),
be= 1.005 Provide secondary rft of 5<1> 121m'
be=1.41 hence the nominal shear stress is given by:
Effective width of cross beams Qu 1176 x 1000 2
=0.61N Imm
qu = B xd = 2650x730
363 364
=0.316~/cuY
This shear stress must be resisted by the shear resistance of concrete, which is
given by the following equation: 1. q
cup·
=0.316 [25 =1.29N Imm
1J1.5
2
qcu =0.16~/cu
1.5
=0.16 [25 =0.65N Imm
1J~
2
a Il: 0.3 [25 2
2. qcUP =0.316 (0.50+-;;\rt =0.316 (0.50+ 0.7!1J1.5 =1.20N Imm
Since qu is less than qcu, the design for one-way shear is considered adequate.
The critical perimeter is at d/2 from the face of the column. For the interior U
column, the critical perimeter equals:
a=c 1 +d =300+730=1030mm qcup= 1.20 N/mm2
Since the applied punching shear stress (0.67) is less than concrete shear
b =c 2 +d =700+730=1430 mm
strength (1.2), the footing is considered safe.
U = 2 (a +b) = 2 (1030 + 1430) = 4920mm The exterior column should also be checked for punching. The ultimate
punching shear stress equals 0.54 N/mm2 which is less than the concrete
I. c2=700 .1 strength (calculation not shown).
r---------
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
L ________ 2
I· b=1430 ·1
The pressure acting on the footing is given by:
The concrete strength for punching is the least of the following three values: Photo 5.6 Portal bridge spanning 146 m (pont du bonhomme, France)
365 366
Example 5.5: RC combined footing resting directly on soil
Design a combined footing to support an exterior column C 1 (0.3 m x 0,4 m)
carrying a total service load of 1100 kN and an interior column C2 (0.3 m x 0.6
m) carrying a total service load of 1600 kN. The plain concrete is used only for
leveling the reinforced concrete footing.
2
Assume that the allowable soil pressure is 185 kN/m , icu=30 N/mm2 and
/y=400 N/mm2
I ~.
Itr- [I ;-
C] ~ 0040 0.60 ~ C2
6<I>20/m'
7<I>12/m' p
line r1-+-o p e r t y / i i_i
!i-_
• ________________ ---I
l ) 1
I I
I I
r 6<I>16/m' )
i
I I
I
11_ . _ - - - - 4.2 m - - - - - -1
Longitudinal reinforcement
Solution
Step 1: Estimate the dimensions of the RC footing
7<1> 121m' 5<1> 121m' The location of the resultant force is determined by taking moment about point
1 • • • •
1 A (see the figure below):
Transverse reinforcement x = 1100xO.2+1600x(4.2+0.2) = 2.69 m
(Sec A-A) r (1100 + 1600)
To ensure uniform pressure throughout the footing, the centroid of the footing
6<1> 161m' 1 ., 9<1>22
must coincide with the resultant of the loads @ 2.69 m. Thus the length of the
footing will be 5.38 m, say L=5,40 m.
Assume that the weight of the footing is about 10% of the total applied loads.
The width of the footing is determined from the allowable soil pressure as
follows:
6<1>20/m' 5<1> 121m'
1 -. .. J B = 1.05 x (1100 + 1600) =2.84m
185x5,4
-7 Take B =2.9m
Transverse reinforcement
(SecB-B) The pressure (o-act) = 1.05 x (1100 + 1600) =181 kN 1m 2 <185 kN 1m 2 ..... ilk
5,4X2.9
6<1>16/m' 1 1 6<1>22
Assume the thickness of the RC footing is 700 mm.
367 368
Program Combined Foundation: output file: combined
P2=1600
Resultant Location (m) Shear force Bending moment
x r =2.7m 2.7m (kN) (kN.m)
0.00 0 0
II
---------1r----~i 0.20 150 15
0.20 -1500 15
Q7it
~ L.._ _ _ ~d-----------------;-~
il
0.40
1.00
-1350
-900
-270
-945
Ii 4 2m 2.20 0 -1485
o.2o--!It-·_------.- - - - - - - I - _ - - i
3.00 600 -1245
~ L=5.4m 4.10 1425 -131
4.40 1650 375
Step 2: Calculate the bending moments and the shear forces
4.40 -750 375
The ultimate pressure is now used to calculate the moment and shear force.
Assuming that the live loads are less than 75% of the dead loads (the usual 4.70 -525 184
case), the ultimate loads equal: 5.40 0 0
Pul =1.5xP = 1.5 x 1100 = 1650 leN
To determine the maximum moment, the point of zero shear is calculated as
Pu2 = 1.5xP = 1.5 x 1600 = 2400 leN follows:
The load for the full 2.9 meters equals: 750y-1650=0
u2 = 1650+2400 = 750 kN 1m.
f = P +P y=2.2m
U1 I
L 5.4 .
The value of the maximum moment is given as:
The computation of shear and moment may be carried out in a normal fashion.
For example, for the location at 3.0 m, the forces equal: M max = 750x2.2 2 /2-1650x(2.2-0.2) =-1485 kN.m
The calculation of the shear and moment may become tedious; therefore a
computer program was used to generate the straining actions at different
locations as shown in the table below. Plots of the values of the shear forces and
bending moments are also given in the following figure.
369 370
2.7 2.7 Step 3: Design the footing for flexure
371 372
0.60 0.60 The calculations of reinforcement are shown in the following table
A smin =--xbxd =--xI000x630=945 mm 2 1m'
fy 400
Item Interior column Exterior column
Since As< Asmin , use Asmil!
LoadPu, kN 1650 2400
Use 5<I> 161m' (1000 mm 2) pressure F=P,/2.9 568.97 827.59
M=f'x;12 480.8 699.310
Step 4.2: Design the footing for flexure (hidden beams)
Transverse strip under each column will be assumed to transmit the load from b(mm) 705 1210
the longitudinal direction to the column. The load under each column is divided d(mm) 610 610
by the footing width (2.9 m) t get the load per meter for the hidden beam. The Mu
breadth of the beam is assumed at d/2 from the column face. The critical section R= 2 0.06 0.05
for moment is at the face of the support. feu be d
(J) 0.0759 0.0635
The reinforcement of the hidden beam is place on top of that of the footing.
Hence, the effective depth is=700 -70 -20=610 mm As = (J) feu I fy b d 2447 3513
As,min 645 1107
As,required(mm:.!) 2447 3513
As,chosen (mmL) AsJ=7<I>22 (2661 mm2) A s2=10<I>22 (3810 mm2 )
l.3m xe=1.3 m l.3m xe=1.3 m
11 2.90m
-I I. ·2.90m
-I Q =Q-f (~+~)=1650-750(0.6+0.63)=1188.75kN
u 2 2 2 2
I Exterior column
I Interior column
This shearing force is resisted by the full width of the footing (B=2900 mm).
.......
by the following equation:
~" As2 ,,~
• • I•••••••• e€.· • •
I--l qeu =0.16~fcu =0.16~30 =0.72Nlmm2
be=O.705 5tP121m' 1.5 1.5
be=1.210
Since qu is less than qcu, the design for one-way shear is considered adequate.
373 374
Step 5: Design for punching shear
qcup= 1.41 N/mm 2
The critical perimeter is at dJ2 from the face of the column. For the interior
Since the applied shear stress is less than concrete shear strength, the footing is
column, the critical perimeter equals:
considered safe.
d 630
a=c1 +-=300+-=615 mm The exterior column should also be checked for punching because its perimeter
2 . 2
is only from three sides. The ultimate punching shear stress equals 1.08 N/mm2
d 630 which is less than the concrete strength (calculations are not shown).
b = c 2 +- = 600+- = 915 mm
2 2
U = 2 (a+b) = 2 (615+915) = 3060mm 7<1>221m'
--------""1
I I
I I
I I
I I
IL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _I
5<1> 161m'
I· b=915 ·1 7<1>22/m· I
,
7<1> 121m'
)
The acting pressure underneath the footing is given by: l
12 =L = 750 = 258.62 kN/m 2
r 5<1> 16/m' )
B 2.9
The punching load equals column load minus the load inside the punching area. Section
qcup=0.316~/cu =0.316~30=1.41Nlmm2 ~ ~
N N
09 09
1. 0
r-- .....
N N
...... 0
......
Y c 1.5 09
tn
09
tn
~ .~
~
2. qCUP =0.316 (0.50+5..) ~/cu =0.316 (0.50+ 0.3) {30 =lA1N Imm 2
c2 Yc 0.6 Vi5 7<1>22/m'
7<1> 121m'
I~ ,
~
3. qcup=0.8(0.20+
a
U
d)~/cu
Yc
=0.8 (0.20+ 4XO.63)~30 =3.66Nlmm 2
3.06 1.5 .-
I5<1> 161m'
'--
Plan
- - 1
,375
376
.~',
The dimensions of the footing are chosen such that the bearing pressures are
uniform and equal under both bases. Therefore, the centroid of the combined
j P ILL=305 kN
j P2LL=450kN
I I
area of the two footings must coincide with the resultant of the two loads. The - -j._-
strap beam joining the footings should not bear against the soil. 0.90
It is common to neglect the strap weight in the design. The strap should be
adequately attached to the both the column and the footing by the use of dowels
such that the footing and the strap act as one unit. The footing is subjected to
one-way bending. The strap beam is reinforced with main reinforcement at the
top between the columns and at bottom under the interior footing.
I.. 4.9m
..I
beam
Solution
Exterior
footing
Step 1: Estimate the dimensions of the plain concrete footing
The working loads are calculated as:
PI = 380 + 305 = 685 kN
I. L .I P2 = 820+450 = 1270 kN
section
~ The location of the resultant of the loads may be determined by taking moment
~ about point o.
~ I
~~ I
I Strap beam I
I ~
y 685xO.25+1270x5.15 =3.433 m
~ 685+1270
~ I
~ The length of the exterior and interior footings should be assumed such that the
~/ plan pressures under the two footings are almost the same. This is achieved by
having the resultant of the loads coincided with the c.g. of the footing.
Fig. 5.14 Strap footing
377 378
The final chosen dimensions of the plain concrete footings are
Item L(m) B (m) Area (m~)
Exterior footing 2.2 2.8 6.16
Interior footing 3.35 2.6 8.71
Total 14.87> 14.34
O.50m O.90m
The c.g. of the footings can be obtained by taking moment of area about point
o.
6.16xl.1 +8.71x5.15
y = =3.47 m
14.87
0 I
m
RJ 4.05m I
Note that the center of gravity of the footings (3.47 m) is very close to the
R2 location of the resultant of the loads (3.43m).
3.433 m R
02j~.
.. I
2.20m ~ 335m Step 2: Dimensions of the reinforced concrete footings
.. I 1-- .. I The dimensions of the reinforced concrete footing can be determined as shown
4.9m
-I in the following table.
Area = ~Ola/ 2150.5 = 14.34 m 2 To ensure the uniform stress distribution, the c.g. of the reinforced concrete
q allowable 150 footings should also coincide with the resultant as much as possible (usually
within 10% is acceptable) .. The distance measured from the c.g. to point 0
The thickness of the plain concrete is assumed to be 400 mm. Assume that the equals:
length of the exterior footing is 2.2 m and the length of the interior footing is
3.35 m. 3.6x1.8/2 + 4.59x5.15
y= =3.28 m
8.19
To reasonably determine the width of the footings, the reactions Rl and R2 are
calculated by taking moments about R 2. The location of the c.g. is close enough (to the location of the resultant.
"379
380
2
15
Step 3: Calculate the ultimate pressure M = 681.5x-·--1064x(1.5-0.25) = -563.3 kN.m
2
To ensure that the strap beam will distribute the pressure uniformly, the
concrete dimensions are taken 0.4 m xl.3 m. The own weight of the strap beam . 1064
Pomt of zero shear = - - = 1.56 m
is usually neglected; however, it can be approximately added to the dead load of 681.5
each column as follows: A computer program was prepared to generate the straining actions at different
locations as shown in the table below. Plots of the shear and moment is also in
W bean = Yc xb Xt xL = 25x0.4x1.3x4.9 == 63 kN the following figure
PIDL=380+6312=411.5 kN P2DL=820+6312= 851.5 kN
Program Foundation: output file: strap
The ultimate loads for the columns are calculated in order to calculate the
ultimate moment and shear. Location Shear force Bending. Notes
(kN) moment (kN.m)
Pul =1.4xPIDL +1.6x~LL =1.4x41l.5+1.6x305:::::1064kN 0.00 0.0 0.0
Pu2 =1.4xP2DL + 1.6 X P2LL =1.4x851.5+1.6x450:::::19P kN 0.25 170.4 21.3 C.L. of left column
To determine the magnitude of Rul ,take the moment about R u2. 0.25 -893.6 21.3 C.L. of left column
381 382
Pu2=1912kN Step 4.2: Design for flexure
Design of section 1
0.50m O.90m Assuming that the distance from the c.g. of the reinforcing steel to the concrete
surface is 70 mm, the effective depth equals
d =t -70mm =1300-70=1230 mm
The maximum moment equals 564.6 kN.m
686kNlm'
,. I
~ 2.55 m -,
RuJ=1749.3
I
I
R= Mu = 564.6 x 10
feu xb xd 2 25 x 400 x 12302
6
= 0.037
1-------- 4.9 m ----_.~I From the chart with R=0.037, the reinforcement index OJ=0.045
~o Design of section 2
893.6 ~ Shear force diagram 874.7 The critical section is at the face of the column, from the output table the
t) maximum moment equals = 233.3 kN.m
s::::
o.
0.g I 6
.gj R = Mu = 233.3 X 10 . = 0.0154
...lj feu xb xd 2 25x 400 x 12302
From the chart with R=0.0154, the reinforcement index OJ=0.019
0. 225 .JJ:
b d = 0.225../2s x400x 1230 = 1536 mm 2'
As min = smaller of fy 360
{
1.3As =1.3x649=844mm 2 .J>As ... useAs,min
383 384
As=844mm2 Exterior footing Interior footing
Item
Use 4<P18/m' (1017 mm2)
pressure (J' (kN/m') 681.5 686
Step 4.3: Design the strap beam for Shear Footing width B' (m) 2.00 1.80
The critical section for shear is at the free span of the strap beam.
Pressure if) = (J'I B' (kN/m.l) 340.8 381.1
Qu=162.7 kN
Moment = f x (B ' - bstrap )2 18 (kN.m) 109.06 93.37
=~= 162.7 X 1000 =0.33 N Imm 2
qu b xd 400x1230 d(mm) 430 430
0.8 0.80 I
Step 5.2 Design the footings for shear
Step 5.1: Design for flexure critical section
Fl F2
A strip of 1m width is taken to determine the for shear
area of steel for the footings. t t t t f f
, &~II~
B=l.BO B=2.25
QI=340.75 kN/m' I- -I I- -I
ql = O'i = 681.5 =340.75 kN 1m 2
BI 2 I. 2.00m
·1
The moment is taken at the face of the strap beam as follows: d/2=0.215
~~ J=~ II
Assume that the depth of the footings is 500. the calculations may summarized
in the following table
Critical section for shear
385 386
The critical section for shear is at dl2 from the face of the strap beam. Noting
that the depth d=0.430 m, the distance x equals to:
8<p 16
B -bs/rop
X =---'- !!:.. = 1.8 - 0.4 0.43 == 0.485 m
-2 2 2 2
5~8/m'lt±=_k_d_=_±_=_k_~
__~,~r+~1-+-~,*,~-r--~-r--~-=-F-~--~-1--~-~~1
~---4~~
Noting that the pressure under footing F2 equals 381.1
Qu equals
kN/m 2 , the shear force .
I
I
I 4 <P 18 IL -________________ ~
4 <P 18
q
cu
=0.16~fcu
1.5
=0.16 (25 =0.65Nlmm
ViS
2
I· 1.80
"I I- 2.55
·1
-r-
Since qu is less than qcu, the footing is considered safe for shear -,.- 1-------.
The design of Fl for shear is summarized in the following table
Item Fl
pressure kN/m" 340.8
b(m) 1.8
x(m) 0.585 5<pI21m' 5<p12/m'
Qu (kN) 358.90
qu(N/mm.l) 0.46
-I-
-'-1-------- -'--
-'--
It should be noted that the presence of the strap beam eliminates the need for
calculating punching shear stresses for the footings.
1-1;,,-...=.:2.=20..=;m'----t-I._
n
n ___ nl- l ·--...::::.3.::::::35!!!.m----J"1
column..$" ~
~ 4<p16
0
IF'lFl 4 <p 16
00
0 c:i 5<b 81m' 2 <p 12
C'] 2<p 12
..... - I-
Il
0
II"l
c:i
J
~ ~m~j~j~~:j !:~~j~fljjj~j1j~ ~j~j~~~ 1jlTIjj~ljljjj~j· Section A-A
-'- ~ 5 <p 121m' ~ 5 <p 161m'
387 388
'r
I 5.9.2 Conventional Rigid Method
5.9 Raft Foundations
The raft foundation shown in Fig. 5.16 has dimensions (B x .L) .. Columns'
5.9.1 Introduction working loads are indicated as PI, P 2, P 3, ••• etc. The apphcatlOn of the
When the bearing capacity of the soil is low, isolated footings are replaced by a conventional method can be summarized as follows:
raft foundation. In such a case, a solid reinforced concrete rigid slab is
Step 1: Check soil pressure
constructed under the entire building as shown in Fig. 5.15. Structurally, raft
foundations resting directly on soil act as a flat slab or a flat plate, upside down, The resultant of columns working loads equals:
i.e., loaded upward by the bearing pressure and downward by the concentrated i=1l
column reactions. The raft foundation develops the maximum available bearing ~otal == ~ +P
2
+ P 3 + ..... == L~ .......................... (5.20)
i=1
area under the building. If the bearing capacity of the soil is so low that even
this large bearing capacity is insufficient, deep foundations such as piles must Assuming that the raft foundation is rigid, the soil pressure at any point can be
be used. Apart from developing large bearing areas, another adyantage of raft obtained using the classical stress equation as follows:
foundations is that their continuity and rigidity that helps in reducing
differential settlement of individual columns relative to each other, which might q == ~otal + M x y + My x -:;;'qallowable ••••...•.••..•••••.••.•• (5.21)
be caused by local variations in the quality of subsoil, or other causes. A Ix Iy
The design of raft foundations may be carried out by one of two methods: Where
A = area of the raft (B x L)
• The conventional rigid method and;
It = moment of inertia of the raft about x-axis == B L3 /12
• The finite element method utilizing computer programs.
Iy = moment of inertia of the raft about y-axis == L B3 /12
The conventional method is easy to apply and the computations can be carried
Mx = moment of the applied loads about the x-axis '''' ~otal e y + Mx(lateralload)
out using hand calculations. However, the application of the conventional
method is limited to rafts with relatively regular arrangement of columns. M
y
= moment of the applied loads about the y-axis = ~otal ex +M y (lateral load)
In contrast, the finite element method can be used for the analysis of raft Where ex and eyare the eccentricities of the resultant from the c.g. of the raft.
regardless of the column arrangements, loading conditions, and existence of
cores and shear walls. Commercially available computer programs can be used. The coordinates of the eccentricities are given by:
The user should, however, have sufficient background and experience.
X' == ~ X1 + P2 X2 + P3 X3 + ............................... (5.22)
~otal
Where Xl, X2, X3 are the X-coordinates of PI, P2, P 3, Pi, ...... , P n .
e ==X'
x
_Ii.2 ................................... (5.23)
Compare the maximum soil pressures value with net allowable soil pressure.
Fig. 5.15 Raft foundation
390
389
Step 2: Draw the shear force and bending moment diagrams
Divide the raft into several strips in the X-direction(Bj, B2, B3) and in the y-
Y' Y direction (B4, B 5, B6, B 7) as shown in Fig. 5.16. Referring to Fig. 5.16, the
interior strip GBIHEJ is used as an example for illustrating the procedure for
c drawing the shear force and the bending moment diagrams for the strips. The
I---! -
A B
procedure may be summarized in the following steps: .
P5
1. The soil pressure at the center-line of the strip is assumed constant along
the width of the strip. Referring to Fig. 5.17, the distribution of the soil
I
I
P6
o
Ptotal qE = ~otaJ _ Mx £
A Ix 2
....................................... (5.27)
ex E9
I
1---~ ---.- ~ t---~~-+----t+=--
I
x
The average pressure equals:
Ii P1 ! I
j---t---r---t--- I
Ip_4_ _ _ 1__ P8 I
------
P 12
I
H~------------------------------------~
G
E J F
X'
Pg P7 P6 Ps
Bl B2 B3 21 E .-.-.-.-.-.-~-.-.-.-.-.-.m-.-.-.-.-.-.- B
B
J 1-1~_____________-ll I
Fig. 5.16 Eccentricity of the raft L
392
391
2. The total soil reaction (RB-E) for the strip B-E is equal to:
RB- e =qavg xB 2 xL ............................................. (5.29) 6. The shear and bending moment can be computed using regular
structural analysis.
Where B2 is the width of strip B-E.
The same process should be carried out for all the strips in the raft
The total applied load acting on this strip equals:
foundation.
PB- e = P5 + P6 + P7 + Ps ....................................... (5.30)
Step 3: Design for flexure
3. To achieve equilibrium, columns' loads and soil reaction must be For each strip the maximum positive and negative moments can be obtained. It
modified such that the sum of the forces is equal to zero. This is should be clear that negative moments need top reinforcement and positive
achieved by obtaining the average load on the strip Pavg . moment needs bottom reinforcement.
Pavg =RB-e+PB-e
2 .............................................. (5.31) The moment per meter is obtained by diving the moment by the strip width:
1M
M = - ............................................................... (5.34)
4. The modified soil pressure equals: B2
Pavg
The ultimate moment is obtained by multiplying the working moment by a load
qmod =T····················································........ (5.32)
factor of 1.5.
5. The modified columns' loads are obtained by multiplying each of the Mu =1.5 M I ....................................................... (5.35)
applied loads by the factor a. given by:
The 'design of different sections can be carried using design curves such as R-O).
Pavg
a =- - .............................................................. (5.33)
PB - e Step 4: Design for punching shear
Thus the modified columns' loads are a. Ps, a. P6. a. P7• and a. P8• This modified The punching load for each column is calculated by mUltiplying the applied
loading is shown in Fig. 5.1S. working load with the load factor.
Pu = 1.5 Pi ................................................ (5.36)
aPs aP5
The critical perimeter is at dl2 from the face of the column. The critical shear
perimeter U is calculated as shown in Fig. 5.19, and the applied punching load
Qu is obtained after subtracting the load of the punching area (a x b) by the
ultimate pressure at this point qsu . Thus:
qmod:
The applied punching shear stress qup equals:
1
1
1
1
1
Cl
the locations of the columns in a raft foundation the bending moment is positive
and requires bottom reinforcement shown in Fig. 5.20. (compare tont.f:Jtive
bending moment and top reinforcement in flat slabs). Moreover,.at a location
1
L ______ I between columns in a raft foundation the bending moment is negf.~ive and
requires top reinforcement as (compare to positive bendi'lg moment arA bottom
1 b ·1 Critical perimeter (U) reinforcement inflat slabs). .
It is customaI"j to reinforce the raft with a bottom bask reinforcing mesh and a
Fig. 5.19 Critical punching shear perimeter basic top reinforcing mesh. Additional reinforcement is provided at locations
where the capacity is exceeded.
The concrete strength for punching is the least of the following three values:
1. lZ:~1.6N Imm 2
qcuP =0.316
Vr: ••••••••••••••••••••• (5.39a)
- -
Bottom steel
395 396
5.9.3 Analysis of the Raft Using Computer Programs
1
Calculation of spring stiffness
Raft foundations can be analyzed using commercially available computer
programs. Such programs are based on the finite element method. The spring stiffness =Coefficient of sub grade reaction (ks) x area served.
5.9.3.1 Modeling of the Raft The coefficient of subgrade reaction is a relationshjp between the soil pressure
and its settement. If a foundation of width B is subjected to a load per unit area
The raft is divided into finite plate bending elements or shell element as shown
q, it will undergo a settlement D. Then, the coefficient of sub grade reaction ks
in Fig. 5.21. The practical dimensions of each element range from O.S m to 1 m.
It is recommended that the aspect ratio of each element not to exceed 3. can be defined as: .
ks = ~ ................................................. (5.40)
node 3
The unit of the coefficient of the subgrade reaction is kN/m . The value of the
coefficient of subgrade reaction differs according to the type of soil. In general,
the higher the bearing capacity, the higher the coefficient is. Its value depends
on several factors, such as the type of soil, the length L, the width B of the
, \
foundation, and the foundation level of raft.
element B
H
\ .. ·I
x
Fig. 5.21 Finite element model for the raft foundation
t t t t t -t t t t t t t t- t
5.9.3.2 Modeling of the soil
The soil is represented by elastic springs located at the nodes as shown in Fig.
S.22. The elastic constant of these springs is named the spring stiffness (Kj , K 2 ,
.... )(kN/m).
To determine the value of the coefficient of subgrade reaction, a field test may
be performed. In such a test, the load is applied to a square plate of dimensions
(0.3 m x 0.3 m) and the corresponding settlement is recorded. The value of
t - -....- -....- -....- -.....- -....- -....--'-:..-... as shell elements coefficient for a large foundation of dimensions (B x B) can be obtained in the
light of the value obtained for the small plate ko.3 as follows:
Soil modeled
as spring ks = kO.3 (B ~~.3)2 for sandy soil ........................ (S.41a)
ks =k Bx8 (1 + B I L)
............................................. (5.42) A B I
1.5 ~ IS: ~
Where KBxB is the coefficient of subgrade reaction for a square foundation with Os: ~
~ :sJ
dimensions (BxB)
Typical values for the coefficient of subgrade reaction leo.3 for sandy and clayey
soils are given in Table (5.3)
K A = k s x y = 0.0625 k s
4
K8 =ks x y =0.125 ks
2
Kc =ks x Y =0.25 ks Photo 5.7 A raft on piles during construction
399 400
5.9.3.3 Analysis of the Computer Output When designing the bottom reinforcement of the raft one should use the value
of the bending moment at the face of the column (Sec. 1-1 and Sec. 2-2) as
The computer output of the raft foundation consists of bending moments acting shown in Fig. 5.26. In other words, the contour line located inside the columns
in the two directions MIl and M22. Most of the available commercial should be ignored.
programs represent the output in graphical forms. The graphical representation
is usually in the form of contour lines, in which each contour line represents a 2
certain bending moment value. It should be mentioned that closely spaced
contour lines indicate concentration of stresses. This usually occurs at the
locations of the columns.
1
Typical output for MJ J is shown in Fig (5-25). This bending moment requires
reinforcement in the direction 1 of the shell. Basic top and bottom
reinforcement meshes are usually provided throughout the raft and additional
bottom reinforcement is usually provided under the columns.
The reaction at each joint spring can be determined from the computer output.
However, it is important to note that the soil capacity should be checked using
the classical stress equation (Eq. 5.21) and not using the spring reactions. This
is attributed to the concentration of forces at the location of the columns.
t-l
Fig. 5.25 Computer output
Solution
-~ --j"" kN I
G B
~f--K r-
I
Where N, 1 1 1 I
1360 ~ ~
J
bl,,1360 kN I I 2880 kN I
A = area of the raft =15.4xI2.4 = 190.96 m 2
I =B L3
3
12.4xI5.4 =3774m4 ~-+-.--lfHf.ll~ M I . :~082 NI
f--,L --+' --- - rIi iIx--1,I--
x 12 12
3 3
L B· = 15.4xI2.4 =2446.8m 4 ~S
P P'otal R
I =J:"2
Y 12
I
1«0 1
- 1
X = - - [0.2 (440+ 1360 x 2 +370)+6.2 (1150x 2+2280x 2)
15330 :f-- 1-- , 1
---L - -
1
- 1--- - --L - -
1
- t~
I
%=6.282 m
e =x _~=6.282_12.4 =0.082 m
_
ID
! H E J FI
X
2 2
x
! 3.0 m 3.0 3.0 3.0)
Similarly, in the y-direction, one can get: 1~ ________~1~2.~00~m~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~
- L
e =Y--
y 2
Fig. EX. 5.8 Layout of the raft
403 404
- 1 Step 2: Calculation of the shear forces and bending moments
Y = 15330 [0.2 (370+1150+440)+5.2 (1360+2880+1440)
+ 10.2x (1360 x 2 + 2880) + 15.2(440+ 1150+ 500)] Step 2.1: Strip ADHG (width= 3.2 m)
Y- =7.751 m The average soil pressure for the strip can be obtained by taking the average
values of the pressures at points A and D.
15
e y =7.751_ .4 =0.051m
2 78.69+75.50 =77.09 kN 1m 2
2
The resultant applied moments are given by:
The total soil reaction RADHG = qavg Bl L = 77.09x3.2xI5.4 =3799 kN
M x = ~otal ey = 15330x 0.051 = 781.83 kN.m
On the other hand the total vertical on this strip equals:
My = ~otal ex = 15330x 0.082 = 1257.06 kN.m PADHG = 440 + 1360 + 1360 + 370 = 3530 kN
The soil bearing pressure can be obtained by applying the following equation: Now, we shall use the average value 0 of the total reaction and PADHG
P +Mx My 15330 781.83 1257.06
Average load =P = R ADHG + PADHG = 3799 + 3530 = 3664.5 kN
q= A "I:Y+I;x =190.96+ 3774 y+ 2446 x avg 2 2
The results are summarized in the following table The modified soil pressure (per the strip) =Pave = 3664.5 = 237.95 kN Im I
, L 15.4
The column loads are modified in the same manner by multiplying the load of
Point x (m) y(m) q(kN/ml)
each column by the ratio (PavIPADHG)'
A -6.2 7.7 78.69
a = Pavg = 3664.5 = 1.0381
B 0 7.7 81.87 PADHG 3530
405 406
The maximum negative moment equals:
1922 Step 2.2: Strip GHJI (width =6.0 m)
= 237.95x-·--456.77(1.92-0.20) =-347.1 kN.m
2 The average soil pressure for the strip can be obtained by taking the average
456.77 1141.82 1141.82 384.1 value of pressures at points Band E.
!
qavg = 81.87 + 78.68 = 80.28 kN / m 2
2
) I JI . I 11 237.95 kN/m'
The total soil reaction RGHJI=qavg Bl L = 80.28x6.0x15.4 = 7417.74 kN
780.6 Now, we shall use the average value of the total reaction and PADHG •
558.5
336.4 Averageload=P = RGHJI +PGHli = 7417.74+8060 =7738.87 kN
avg 2 2 ..
Shear The modified soil. pressure (per the strip) = Pavg = 7738.87 = 502.52 kN / m I
(kN)
L 15.4
The column loads are modified in the same manner by mUltiplying each column
load by the ratio (PavglPGHJI)
The shear force and bending moment diagrams are shown in figure. Three
points of zero shears exist. They are calculated as follows:
~op stee; 1 .
502.52 ' 502.52
. I. .1 1 2
407
408
1104.2 2765.3 2765.3 1104.2 Step 2.3: Strip ACKL (width = 2.70 m)
I ! ! !
The average soil pressure for the strip can be obtained by taking the average
value of the pressures at points A and C.
The modified soil pressure (per the strip) = PlNg = 2415.5 = 194.8 kN / m'
B 12.4 .
1003.6
1256.2 The column loads are modified in the same manner by multiplying each column
1509 load by the ratio (PavglPGHJ[)
1 440 508.54
2 1150 1329.14
Moment
(kN.m) 3 500 577.89
The shear force and bending moment diagrams are shown in figure. Two points
of zero shears exist. They are calculated as follows:
409 410
Step 2.4: Strip KLPR (width =5.0 m)
508.5 1329.1 577.9 The average soil pressure for the strip can be obtained by taking the average
value of the pressures at points M and N.
1
f f ·f
1
f f f
I 1 194.8 kN/m'
qal'g
= 77.61 +2 83.98 = 8080
.
kN
A verage Ioad = Pal'g = RACKL 2+ PACKL = 5009.4+
2
5600 53047
=.
Shear
(kN)
. pressure (per the stnp)
The modified sOlI Pavg =5304.7
. =-- - - - = 427 .80 k N I m '
B 12.4
The column loads are modified in the same manner by multiplying each column
629.9
load by the ratio (PavIPGUJI)
412
411
Step 3: Design for flexure
1288.3 2728.1 1288.3 Step 3.1: Reinforcement for strip ADHG
f
! I I I
!
I I
!
I t 427.8 kN/m'
The maximum positive moment is equal to 933.2 kN.m. This positive bending
moment needs bottom reinforcement.
To obtain the reinforcement per meter divide the above value by the width of
strip (B=3.2 m) ~ M ' = 933.2 = 291.63 kN .m I m I
0.20 -11 . 6.0 ·1· 6.0 ·11-°·20
3.20
To design this critical section, calculate the ultimate moment by multiplying M'
1364.1 by the load factor 1.5.
1202.7
M u = 1.5 M' = 1.5 x 291.63 = 437.45 kN.m
Assuming that the distance from the c.g. ofthe reinforcing steel to the concrete
surface is 70 mID and the total thickness is 750 mID. The effective depth equals:
Shear
(kN) d =t -70mm =750-70=680 mm
6
437.45 X 10 = 0.0378
1202.7 250 x 1000 X 680 2
1364.1
From the chart with R=0.0378, the reinforcement index UFO.046
f ~.?
A = OJx...E!..xb xd = 0.046x-xl000x680 =.2172 mm-
s ~ 360
Moment
(kN.m)
0.6b d = 0.6 xl000x680=1133 mm 2
Asmin -- sm aller OJ,{" fy 360· .
{
1.3As = l.3x2172 = 2823 mm 2
Use 7<l>20/m' (2199 mm2) (Bottom)
492.6
Similarly, the maximum negative moment is equal to 778.7 kN.m.
413 414
365.02xl06 =0.0315 Step 3.2: Reinforcement for strips GHJI, ACKL and KLPR
250 x 1000 X 680 2
To avoid lengthy calculations, the following table illustrates the required steps
From the chart with R=0.0315, the reinforcement index ar=0.038 to obtain the reinforcement.
A = OJ x feu xbxd =0.038x~xl000x680=1794mm2 Strip Strip GHJI Strip ACKL Strip KLPR
s ~ 360
Reinforcement Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top
0.6 b d = 0.6 xl000x 680 = 1133 mm 2
Asmill = smaller of fy 360 M(kN.m) 1273.2 992.3 692.9 562.1 492.6 1682.1
{
. 1.3As = 1.3 x 1794 = 2332 mm 2
B(m) 6.0 6.0 '2.7 2.7 5.0 5.0
Use 7<1>18/m' (1781 mm2) with additional (3.5 <1> 161m') (Top)
Thus in this direction use a bottom mesh 7<1>20/m' and a top mesh 7<1>18 1m' M' (kN.mlm) 212.2 165.4 256.6 208.2 98.5 336.4
** A bottom mesh of7 <1> 201m' (2199 mm2) and a top mesh of7 <1> 181m'
(1718 mm2) are provided(Refer to Fig. EX. 5.8.2). Additional reinforcement
may be placed at the location ofthe larger capacity.
415
416
Step 4: Design for punching shear The concrete strength for punching the least of the three values:
The maximum vertical load occurs at the column that carries 2880 kN. Thus,
the ultimate load is obtained by multiplying this load by the load factor of 1.5.
1. qellp =0.316 !Jeu =0.316 {25 =1.29 N Imm 2 <L6 ..... .o.k
Pu =1.5 Pmax = 1.5 x 2880 = 4320 kN re Vu
The critical perimeter is at d/2 from the face of the column. For the interior
column, the critical perimeter equals: 2. qcuP =0.316 (0.50+~)lell =0.316 (0.50+ 0.4) {25 =1.94N Imm 2
b rc 0.4 Vu
d =680 mm
b =c 2 +d =400+680=1080mm
a d -
3. qCIIP =0.8 (0.20+--)
U
fill.
rc
(.
=0.8 0.20+ 4xO.68 )H.f5
4.32
- =2.71 N Imm 2
1.5
U =2 (a+b)=2 (1080+1080)=4320mm
Since the applied punching shear is larger than concrete punching shear
strength, the raft is considered unsafe against punching failure. The designer
may use one of two solutions:
j" - - - - --.
I I
o 1- Increase raft thickness to 800 mm to decrease the punching stress to 1.26
00
o • 2
N/mro • The reinforcement may be redesigned for more economic solution.
i •
•
•
L _____ _
• 2- Increase the concrete compressive strength to 31 N/mm 2 to increase qCIIP to
1.42 N/mro 2 •
I· b=1080 ·1
The pressure at point O· (refer to the table) is equal to 80.8 kN/m 2
Thus the ultimate soil pressure qsu = 1.5x 80.8 = 121.19 kN 1m 2
The punching load equals:
Q• =Pu -q ru (axb)=4320-121.19 (1.08 x 1.08) =4178.6
. kN
417 418
Y' Y
Example 5.9: Raft design using computer analysis
Figure EX. 5.9 shows the axes and columns of a twelve-story building. The
bearing capacity of the soil equals 200 kN/m 2 at F.L. The material properties
are feu =35 N/mm2 and h = 360 N/mm2. Based on the recommendations of the
geotechnical report, it is decided to use a rigid raft as a foundation system.
- _--1- _____ 1 The building is provided with relatively rigid shear walls in the two orthogonal
,- :3.5~81-J..1P..18/m directions to resist the lateral loads. Consequently, analysis of the building
- """ Top rft under lateral loads could be carried out in each direction independent of the
71/J20/m other. The following data are available from the analysis of the building in the
X-direction:
1- The total unfactored moment (My) due to earthquake =16000.0 kN.m (reversible).
VI
C'i ..§ The resultant of the un factored gravity load at the foundation level = 68000.0 kN and
~ is located as shown in Fig. EX S.9a. !
a ~=§:
0
-q-
-t t- 2- Structural analysis of the building under the case of the emthquake acting in the X-
~ x direction and under the critical load combination has resulted in the following straining
I actions at the foundation level:
VI
C'i 1 I(
Column Ultimate My (kN.m) Ultimater load (kN)
(U
IIEI..§I
I I (A-I)
(WI)
0
8000
9S0
4200
I~~I
~I~I (A-4) 0 13S0
(B-1) 0 18S0
<'if- (B-2) 0 40S0
(B-3) 0 49S0
I I (B-4) 0 27S0
l I (C-l) 0 21S0
(W3) 0 6500
I (W4) 0 8900
(C-4) 0 3200
3.0m 3.0 (D-l) 0 21S0
12.40m (D-4) 0 3200
(E-l) 0 2150
(E-2) 0 47S0
(E-3) 0 5800
column (E-4) 0 3200
40x40 (F-l) 0 1300
(W2) 12000 7000
(F-4) 0 1900
71/J20/m
sec. 1-1
3.51e 18/m 3.51e 18/m
'7ye18/m Analysis for the building for the case of the earthquake acting in the in Y-direction
71/J18/m ~. provides straining actions that are not given since the example will be worked out only
I, , 71e 2O/m" I for the case of the earthquake acting in the in X-direction.
7¢p20/m t , t 7ye20/m I
420
419
2 3 4 Solution
i4.75m Step 1: Dimensions of the raft
3.875 5.00 5.875
Wherever possible, it is recommended to extend the raft beyond the edge
columns by a distance that ranges from 0.5 m to 1.0 m. In this building, it is
W2 decided to extend the raft by 0.75 m from all the edge columns, except those
F
located near the property line as shown in Fig. Ex .5.9b.
to
As a role of thumb, it is a common practice to assume the thickness of the raft
.....
C? for multistory buildings to be equal to the number of stories multiplied by (80
u)
450 x 800 (Typ.) mm to 100 mm). Accordingly, the thick;ness of the raft is assumed 1100 mm.
E
to
.....
~10 R
1.
3
= 15.75x25.5 = 21763 m 4 &
3
I = 25.5x15.75 = 8302.3m4
~
C?
M 0 3: ., 12 y 12
C\I to
u)
The resultant of the gravity loads does not coincide with the center of gravity of
the raft. It can be easily proved that the eccentricities ex and ey, as shown in Fig.
EX 5.9b, are given by:
ex =0.3 m e y =0.5m
Since the moment due to the earthquake is reversible, one should consider the
II
direction in which the moment due to the earthquake and that due to the
eccentricity of the resultant of the gravity loads have the same sign.
(My)total = Moment due to earthquake + Moment due to eccentricity of the
resultant of the gravity loads
Wi
My)total = My+ (ex x N)
422
421
y - N- .+ M
_ x (Ialal)
Y +M y(IOlal)
x
1 2 3 4 f
A Ix Iy
15.75m The coordinates of points A and Bare (7.875,12.75) and (-7.875,-12.75),
0.87! 3.875 5.001 5.875 respecti veJy.
It) I()
r-. r-.
<Xl
1 W2 <Xl
f = 68000 + 34000 12.75 + 36400 7 .875 = 223.76 KN 1m 2 < (1.3 X 200)
I® ci
--:- I
- •
,..;
-® A 401.6 21763 8302
.:e I()
r-.
f = 68000 + 34000 (-12.75) + 36400 (-7.875) = 114.87 KN 1m 2 < (1.3 x 200)
C? <':!
.,; I()
B 401.6 21763 8302
r- - .,. 1
.,.
I®
0
I()
.j-
t 1
- •
~
0
I()
.j-
-® According to the Egyptian Code for Foundations, the allowable bearing
capacity of the soil can be increased to 1.3 of its recommended value whenever
the earthquake load is considered. Hence, the stresses on soil are safe.
I@ 100
1"'-
1 - •• @ y
-1~
E x
~- -
0
I()
.,;
C\I
0
I()
.,; ~
C.G
~
0
It)
.,;
E
0
.1()
.,;
1--
_-r--_ My =16000
C\I
-------+------~ A
.. -
r
I
I© I- -
·
• -©
MX(lOtal) Mx =0
0 0
I() I()
.j-
I I 1 I I .j-
.. t 0.5 x
I I
® 100.
- - •• -®
I() I()
r-. 1 r-.
.
<Xl <Xl
ci ci 0.3
I@ ~
<Xl
ci
- -
I
W1 -
~
<Xl
0
-@
B
0.875 3.875 5.00 5.875
15.75m
~
1 2 3 4
424
423
Step 3: Computer analysis of the raft Distribution of loads on (W 1)
The wall is subjected to a normal force (-4200 kN) and a bending moment
Step 3.1: Modeling the raft and the soil (8000 kN.m). The force at each node is evaluated by the superposition principle
as follows:
The raft was modeled using shell elements and the soil was modeled using
spring elements. Many commercial computer programs are well documented A-Normal force
and can be used. In this example, the well-known structural analysis program
This wall is modeled using 22 nodes. Hence, the share of each node is equal to:
SAP-2000 was used in the analysis. Figure 5.9d shows the finite element mesh
used in the analysis. No = N = -4200 = -190.1 kN .t
I No. of Nodes 22
The majority of the elements had dimensions 0.5m x 0.5m. At some locations,
however, smaller element dimensions were used. B-Bending moment
An approximate estimate of the coefficient of subgrade reaction is obtained as 3 3
B: Shear walls Where Pi is the force at node i and Xi is the distance from node i to the center
of gravity of the wall.
In order to model the forces and moments acting on the shear walls, it was
assumed· that the gravity load could be divided among all the points
representing o:he wall, whereas the moment could be represented by
L> i = 2.5 + 2.0 + 1.5 + 1.0 + 0.5 = 7.5 ms
425 426
2.0
P2 =-x-1200=-320 kN -v
I
P3 =~X-1200 =-240 kN' "- Distribution of loads on (W 2)
7.5 7.5
The wall is subjected to a normal force (-7000 kN) and a bending moment
0.5 I
(12000 kN.m). the force at each node is evaluated by the superposition
P4 = .!:Q.x-1200 = -160 kN "- P5 =-x-1200=-80 kN -v
7.5 7.5 principle as follows:
C- Total force A-Normal' force
The total force at each node is given in Table EX 1. This wall is modeled using 26 nodes. Hence, the share of each node equals:
I : : : : : : : : ': I
I No. of Nodes' 26
Nodes numbering
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
B-Bending moment
3 3
1= b xt = 0.30x6 = 5.4 m 4
12 12
~ M 0- =~x = 12000 3 .0 = 6666.7 kN 1m 2
;r//////////////////////////////////h I 5.4
Wall WI
5.0m
PI =P =.!..x6666.7xO.3x3.0=±3000 kN
Pt c 2
Since we have two rows of nodes (2 x13), the share of each row is given by
(refer to the figure):
Stresses diagram and
the resultant forces
p' Pc = -3000 = -1500 kN
C No.of raws 2
To distribute the forces along the nodes, it shall be assumed that the loads at the
nodes are proportion to their distance from point of zero stress.
P6 P5 P4 P3 P2 PI
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Transformation of
moment into nodal
forces
ttttt ~
P11 PIO P9 P8 P7 I l.5m
0 0 0
I>i = 3.0+2.5 +2.0+1.5+1.0+0.~ =10.5ms
P2 = 2.5 x-1500 = -357.1 kN "-
PI = 3.0 x -1500 = -428.6 kN "-
2m 10.5 10.5
2.5m
P3 = 2.0 x-1500 = -285.7 kN "- P4 =~x-1500=-214.3kN "-
10.5 10.5
Transformation of moment into nodal forces for wall WI
427
428
1~ I 0.50 Table EXl Total force for the shear walls at each node
P5 = 10.5 x-1500 = -142.9 kN -v P6 = 1O.5x-1500=-71.4kN J,
Wl W2
c-Total force Force Force Resulting Force Force Resulting
The total force at each node is given in Table EX 1. resulting resulting force at resulting resulting force at
(]) form form each form form each node
"0
26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 0 Normal bending node Normal bending
Z force moment force moment
Nodes numbering
I :::::::::::I
13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
1
2
-190.9
-190.9
--400.0
-320.0
-590.9
-510.9
-269.2
-269.2
-428.6
-357.1
-697.8
-626.4
3 -190.9 -240.0 -430.9 -269.2 -285.7 -554.9
4 -190.9 -160.0 -350.9 -269.2 -214.3 --483.5
5 -190.9 -80.0 -270.9 -269.2 -142.9 -412.1
V/b'/////////////////#/#/##///#/##/fi
6 -190.9 0.0 -190.9 -269.2 -71.4 -340.7
Wall W2
6.0m 7 -190.9 80.0 -110.9 -269.2 0.0 -269.2
8 -190.9 160.0 -30.9 -269.2 71.4 -197.8
Pt 9 -190.9 240.0 49.1 -269.2 142.9 -126.4
10 -190.9 320.0 129.1 -269.2 214.3 -54.9
11 -190.9 400.0 209.1 -269.2 285.7 16.5
Stresses diagram and 12 -190.9 -400.0 -590.9 -269.2 357.1 87.9
the resultant forces 13 -190.9 -320.0 -510.9 -269.2 428.6 159.3
14 -190.9 -240.0 -430.9 -269.2 -428.6 -697.8
15 -190.9 -160.0 -350.9 -269.2 -357.1 -626.4
16 -190.9 -80.0 -270.9 -269.2 -285.7 -554.9
17 -190.9 0.0 -190.9 -269.2 -214.3 --483.5
P7 P6 P5 P4 P3 P2 PI 18 -190.9 80.0 -110.9 -269.2 -142.9 -412.1
Transformation of o 0 0! !!!!!!
0 0 0
19
20
21
-190.9
-190.9
-190.9
160.0
240.0
320.0
-30.9
49.1
129.1
-269.2
-269.2
-269.2
-71.4
0.0
71.4
-340.7
-269.2
-197.8
JJ,tLt t. ttl I I I
moment into nodal
forces 22 -190.9 400.0 209.1 -269.2 142.9 -126.4
23 -269.2 214.3 -54.9
2m I 24 -269.2 285.7 16.5
205m 25 -269.2 357.1 87.9
3m
26 -269.2 428.6 159.3
Total -4200.0 -4200.0 -7000.0 -7000.0
Transformation of moment into nodal forces for wall W2
429 430
The concrete punching strength is the least of the three values:
In the computer model, the forces and moments acting on the columns were
assigned to the joints. For shear walls, however, the resulting forces given in 1. q
cup
= 0.316 ~fcu
Y
= 0.316
V{35
1.5 = 1.52N Imm
2
< 1.6. N Imm 2 ..... iJ.k
Table EX 1 that represents the applied. moments and normal force were c
assigned to the nodes of the shear walls. The output of the program is shown in
Fig. EX9.5d
2. q
cup
=0.316 (0.50+~)~fclI
b Y
=0.316 (0.50+ 0.45)
0.80
(35 =1.62N Imm
VLs
2
a=c 1 +d =450+1030=1480mm
ok
b =c2 +d =800+1030=1830 mm
3
Step 4.2.1: Critical sections
= 5800x10 = 0.85N Imm 2
quP 6620x1030 The computer output of the raft foundation consists of bending moments acting
in the two directions Mu (x-direction in this case) and M22 (y-direction in this
case). The graphical representation is in the form of contour lines, in which
Critical punching each contour line represents a certain bending moment value as shown in Fig.
c2=800 perimeter
EX. 9.5d . It should be mentioned that closely spaced contour lines indicate
r--j'----J---V-- concentration of stresses. This usually occurs at the locations of the columns.
When designing the bottom reinforcement of the raft one should use the value
I I
o
00
"<t
] :
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
0
I(")
It
0
of the bending moment at the face of the column.
I I
I I
I I
/. -/
b=1830
432
431
Step 4.2.2: Design of sections
The design for flexure for a critical section of 1.0 m width is carried out as
follows:
Mil
1030=C\
35 x 1000
Mu ~A.
360xJ x 1030 SlTUn
0.6 0.60 2 I
A'min =-b d =-xlOOOx1030 = 1716 mm (5iP22Im)
. fy 360
It is decided to use a mesh 5 cP 221m / top and bottom, and use addtioal
reinforcement where needed.
It should be mentioned that the above procedure should be repeated for the case
in which the earthquake load acting in the X-direction but in the reversed
direction. In such a case, the moments acting on the shear walls will be reversed
and the procedure described for transforming the moments and the normal
forces acting on the shear walls into nodal forces will be followed.
Moreover, the raft should be analyzed for the case in which the earthquake load
is actin in the Y-direction (straining actions are not given for that case).
The final reinfocement of the raft should cover all the cases.
433 434
Additional top rft. ------
Additional bottom rft.
1 2 3 4
15.75m
0.87 3.875 5.0 5.875
,...
ll)
,§l!;i.
,...
ll)
~ ~ ~
'® ~
~-
~
~j3 .... -®
~~
~
N ~
EIE 5~25/m
E
...,.
m
iF~
~I ,...
ll)
,...
ll)
NI';l ll)
(')
u;
~I..J
tq
l
3m . L=9m '@ol
~13m
(')
u;
~NI 2.5 22m 2.5l 22 m I
~~ L;=~_EE E
~ P"1
L=~EE
~~
I® ~~
1=
M I~j
-E
(') T~.!l
ci ~ ~
-®
<& - ll)
.- ~ 2m
- am tq
N
_
5~221m
am N
ll)
0
-.i Basic Mesh -.i
E Top&Bottom
~
1 E
® ~- - ~ f.J"
~., -@
~N ~ 2.5 22
L= ~m
m 2.5 22. In
L 3m ~ ~
E N E
ll)
u; I E
~ I ll)
u;
~~@
ll) E tq N
N
u; E E co
i~
co '@oj co j
ll)
ll) ll)
©
~ !- '1fT
C\i
- ::lIT
C\i
~~r:
EE
'@o .:i" -©
~~ ~2rT
ll) ll)
-.i
-.i
b I
2.5 22 11 2.5~221l
I I
® ~
~
1- ~
1= L=~ ~E
(')
"'""~ !.\
arT tq
~ -E
(')
L=~ ~E
arT
"''''c...
'@o !.\
.
§
~ ~r
.~ 2rT
E
-®
,...
ll) N
N N
~
N ,...
ll)
co co
M E 5~221m M
~ ~ L=9m ~t? E
~ ~£"
E
~~ (') ~ II
@ ,...co ,...<0 @
ci
~ bn;-i 4m ll) ~ --' ci
C\i,m
0.87!i 3.875 5.0 5.875
15~75m
1 2 3 4
435
5.10 Design of Pile Caps
5.10.1 Introduction
Piles are structural members used to transmit surface loads to lower levels in
the soil mass. This transfer could be made by a vertical distribution of the load
along the pile shaft or by a direct application of load to a lower stratum through
the pile base. A direct load application is made by an end-bearing pile as shown
in Fig. 5.27a and a vertical distribution of the load is made using a friction pile
as shown in Fig. 5.27b. In general, most piles carry loads as a combination of
side resistance and point bearing except when the pile penetrates an extremely
soft soil to a solid base.
Pile Cap
t t t
Rock or hard layer
t
compressible stratum.
a) End-bearing Pile
Pile Cap
I
1I~
1 I If\ produces
skin resistance
major
1I~ part oflt
1I~ 1 ~
b) Friction Pile
Fig. 5.27 Friction and end b~aring piles Photo 5.11 Construction of pile caps
437
438
5.10.2 Configurations of Pile Caps 5.10.3 Design of Pile Caps
Unless a single pile is used, a cap is necessary to spread the vertical and Pile caps may be designed using one of the following methods:
horizontal loads and any overturning moments to all the piles in the group. Pile 1. Conventional design method.
caps take different shapes according to the number of piles used as shown in 2. Finite element method.
Fig. 5.28. The pile cap has a reaction that is a series of concentrated loads at the 3. Strut and Tie method
locations of the piles.
The acting loads on the pile cap includes the column loads and moments, any 5.10.3.1 Design using the conventional Method
soil overlying the cap (if it is below the ground surface), and the weight of the
cap. Step 1: Determine the load of each pile
For a concentrically loaded pile cap, the load per pile is given by:
1.05xN
---~Pallowable •.......•••••........•.....••...•••..•.• (5.43)
n
in which
P = Pile working load
1.05 = factor taking into account the pile cap self weight (5% ofthe load)
n = Number of piles
,l '4\
, ,
\
,
I
.--. ji-'
"
\
\,
.
I
N =
Pallowable
Working load ofthe column
= Allowable pile load
, / , /
.... _"'" .... _<11'
For eccentrically loaded pile caps, the load per pile is given by:
a) 4 Piles b) 3 Piles _N My Mx
P pile --+" . 2 X + ". 2 Y ~Pallowable ............•....•.•.• (5.44)
n L,.X L,.Y
where
Mx,My = moments about x and y axes, respectively
x,y = distances from y and x axes to any pile
439 440
• The reaction of the pile is neglected if the pile center is located at <P12 or Step 3: Two-way (Punching) shear strength of pile caps
more inside the critical section, case (b).
The calculation of the punching load for a pile cap is minimally addressed in
• For intermediate positions of pile center, the portion of the pile reaction to the literature. TheECP 203 does not give explicit procedure for calculating the
be considered as producing shear on the section shall be based on straight- punching load for pile caps. In this text, an approximate procedure is proposed.
line interpolation between full value at <P12 outside the section and zero It should be emphasized, however, that such an approximate procedure does not
value at <P12 inside the section, case (c). reflect the actual complicated behavior.
Consider the pile cap shown in Fig. 5.30. The critical section for punching is
I-draw the critical section at d/2 located at d/2 from the face of the column. It will be assumed that parts of the
from the column. piles located inside the punching perimeter shall participate in reducing the
Column 2-draw the boundaries @ fPl2 punching load. Referring to Fig. 5.30, the punching load can be calculated as
dI2
from each side of the critical sec. follows: .
4>12 4>12
3-draw the exact location of the
pile and calculate (a) hatched area of the pile
4-calculate the Preduced at the pile it = .......................... (5.45)
gross area of the pile
location
'"
t;; Fig. 5.30 Critical section for punching
o
'.p
'1::
U
Q up =(Column ultimate load + o. w. of pile cap within the punching perimeter) - 2 XA. x pileload
Case (a) 100% Case (b) 0% Case (c) interpolate 0-+ 100 The punching stress q
up
=~
U xd
............................................................... (5.46)
441 442
The concrete punching strength is given as the least ofthe following values: 5.10.3.2 Finite Element Analysis of Pile Caps
1. qcUP =0.316,jf :::;1.6 N Imm 2 •••••••••••.••••• ~ ••••• (S.47a) The number of piles can be determined using the procedure mentioned in step 1
of the conventional method. Pile cap bending moments can be obtained using
the FEM. Such a procedure can be carried out using commercially available
2. qcuP = 0.316 (o.so+~)lCU
b Y
............................ (S.47b) computer programs. It should be mentioned, however, that one-way shear and
punching shear can not be obtained from such an analysis. One-way shear
c
punching shear calculations should be made according to the procedures
mentioned in the conventional method.
3. qcup= 0.8 (0.20+ a d )lCU ............................(S.47c)
u Yc .
The pile cap is modeled using shell elements while the piles are modeled using
where qcup is the punching shear strength provided by concrete; (a/ b) is the spring elements as shown in Fig. 5.32. Due to the fact that pile caps are usually
ratio of long side to short side of column, a= 4, 3, and 2 for interior, edge, and thick, the use of shell elements that do not consider the effect of shear
comer columns, respectively, d is the effective shear depth of the pile cap deformation is not advisable. Past experience, however, proved that the use of
(average flexural depth in the two directions), U is the perimeter of the critical ordinary (thin) shell elements is adequate for design purposes. Deign moments
section, and feu is the concrete compressive strength. Check of punching should should be calculated at the face of the column.
be performed around the individual pile. It is a common practice to calculate the spring constant of piles based on the
permissible settlement of the pile during the pile load test. In other words, the
Step 4: Design for Flexure
pile spring constant Kpile is calculated as follows:
The ECP 203 requires the critical section for flexure to be taken at the face of
the column as shown in Fig. S.31. Pile caps must be reinforced in two
Pile working load
perpendicular directions. In most cases, an isolated centrally-loaded pile cap K pile - - - - = - - - - ...................... (5.48)
supporting a single column needs only bottom reinforcement. However, Permissible settlement
eccentrically loaded pile caps and pile caps supporting more than one column
might need top reinforcement as well.
Loads
The minimum cover for the reinforcement is 70 mm (concrete cast against soil).
Column
Cap modeled
as shell elementS
Nodes
"+t-' ~'
/ , I '
I \ I \
--I 1
' I
"
"'-"
\
,/
.... _"'
I
443 444
5.10.3.3 Design using The Strut and Tie Method
Example 5.10
The Egyptian Code ECP 203 allows the use of the Strut-and-Tie method for
designing pile caps. The structural action of a four-pile group is shown in Fig. Design and give complete reinforcement detailing for a pile cap that constitutes
5.33. The pile cap is a special case of a deep beam and can be idealized as a a part of a deep foundations system of a high-rise building. The design data are
space truss with four compression struts transferring load from the column to as follows:
the piles, and four tension ties equilibrating the outward components of the
compression struts. The tension ties have constant force in them and must be Column dimensions = 900 mm x 900 mm
anchored for the full horizontal tie force outside the intersection of the pile and Unfactored column load =5000 kN
the compression strut. Hence, bars must either extend a distance equal to the Factored column load = 7500 kN
anchorage length past the centeriines of the piles, or they must be hooked Pile diameter =800mm
outside this point. For the pile cap shown in Fig. 5.33, the total tie force in one Pile working load = 1400 kN 2
direction can be calculated from the force triangular shown. feu =40N/mm
/y = 360 N/mm2
Column load
Solution
Step 1: Dimensions of the· pile cap
In order to determine the dimensions of the pile cap, one has to determine the
A A number of piles.
(b) internal forces in pile cap (a) Pile cap Choose 4 piles. It should be noted that the multiplier 1.05 takes into
consideration the own-weight of the pile cap.
Pu
The spacing between the piles is usually taken (2.5 <I> - 3 <1». In this example,
the spacing between piles is taken = 2.2m. The distance from the centerline of
the pile to the edge is taken (0.8 <I> -1 <1».
The dimensions of the pile cap are shown in the following figure. The thickness
of the pile cap shall be assumed equal to 1.0 m.
Pul4
unfactored column load + own weight of pile
Exact pile load = ____________ ~_~
cap
_ ___o..
Pul4
L number of piles
(C) Force in tie A-B
=5000+361 = 1340.25kN < 1400kN ... fJk
4
Fig. 5.33 Strut and Tie method for a pile cap
445 446
00
c::5
-
......
.....<
-
......
S
<=>
OC!
<')
/17\ ~
\
.....
'....
-- ...
;-/
I
.I
o.o~
I
I
:=tt/
\
.\
' ... /
I
...... I
-
00
c::5
%100
0.585
SEC(1-1)
Step 2: Design for shear
According to the ECP-203, the pile load that should be considered when
Step 2.1: One-way shear checking the shear strength of pile caps can be reduced depending on the
location of the center of the pile with respect to the critical section.
Ultimate load of pile = factored load of column + factored O.W. of piIecap
4 Preduced =reduced pile load for checking shear strength
Ulti rnate Ioa pI e = 7500+ 1.4x361
d '0 f'l 2001.35 kN.m Preduced =reduction factor x ultimate load of pile
4
d = 1000-70 = 930mm
= 585 x2001.35 =1463.487 kN
The critical section for one-way shear is at d/2 from the face of the column as 800
shown in the following figure.
447 448
Qu =2xreduced pile load - O.W. of pile cap outside of the critical section (hatched Referring to figure, it can be noted that very small area of each pile is located
area) inside the critical punching area (3.5%). According to the previous procedure,
the punching load could be calculated as follows:
Qu =2xI463,487 -1.4x25x3.8xO.985xl.O =.2796 kN
/L = hatched area of the pile = 0.035
gross area of the pile
Critical section
,-,
I \
I I
\ I
'-'
s
o00
c<i
,-,
I \
I I
\ I
'-'
1·°·985. I
I
I ow
Qu 2796 X 103
~;!d~~ 1
2
q" = bxd = 3800 x930 0.79 N Imm
punching surface
~
o
qcu =0.16
fi
Yc
= 0.16 - = 0.826 N I mm 2
--E.!!-
1.5 .
Since qu < qcu , the thickness of the pile cap is considered adequate for one-way
Qup = (Column load + O.W ;of pile cap within the punching perimeter)- 4 x Ax pile load
449 450
The concrete strength for punching is. the least of the three values: Step 3: Design for flexure
The critical section for flexure is at the face of the column.
1. qcuP = 0.316 ~cuY = 0.316 {40 = 1.63N/rom
'11.5
2
> 1.6 N/rom 2
-7= 1.6 N/rom 2
Critical
Since quP <qcuP' the thickness of the pile cap is adequate for punching shear. E
o00
C<)
Note: The reader might notice that the reduction of the punching load due to the
existence of the parts of the areas of the piles within the perimeter of punching
complicates the calculations. Accordingly, the designer could conservatively
neglect such a reduction in cases where it has trivial effect on the results.
451 452
Example 5.11
Design and give complete reinforcement detailing for a pile cap that constitutes
a part of a deep foundations system of a factory. The design data are as follows:
12@250mm t-
~ •
•
Factored column load = 6750 kN
Pile diameter =800mm
•
t-
~- ......... .. . . . . . .. . . • Pile working load
feu
= 1750kN
=35 N/mm2
= 400 N/mm2
I I
h
Plain concretel
y
5 f/25/m
Solution
Step 1: Dimensions of the pile cap
Reinforcement Details In order to determine the dimensions of the pile cap, one has to determine the
required number of piles.
Choose 3 piles. The multiplier 1.05 takes into consideration the own weight of
the pile cap.
The spacing between the piles is usually taken (2.5 $ - 3 $). In this example,
the spacing between piles is taken = 2.2 m. The distance from the centerline of
the pile to the edge is taken (0.8 $ -1 $).
The plan dimensions of the pile cap are shown in the following figure. The
thiclmess of the pile cap shall be assumed equal to 1.3 m.
Unfactored own weight of the pile cap = 5.0 x 4.33/2 x 1.3 x 25 = 351.8 kN
454
453
Critical section 1
The critical section for one-way shear is at dl2 from the face of the column as
shown in the figure below.
co
co
'"
According to the ECP-203, the pile load considered when checking the shear
strength of pile caps can be reduced depending on the location of the center of
the pile with respect to the critical section.
From the figure, the distance (x) from the center of gravity of the column to the
Pile cap arrangement center of gravity of the pile equals = 1.1Icos 30° =1.27 m.
Preduced = reduction factor x ultimate load of pile
There are two possible sections for one-way shear as follows: O.W. of the pile cap = O.W. of the hatched part in the following figure
=1.4 x 2.11 x 1.8312 x 1.3 x 25 = 87.8 leN
455 456
'.
1\
I ,
I \
I \
Qu =1901.2 - 87.8=1813.4 kN
=~=
3
1813.4 X 10 =0.70 N I mm 2
qu b xd . 2110 x1230
Qup = (Column load + O. W.of pile cap within the punching perimeter)- 3x Ax pile load
457 458
Step 3: Design for flexure
The concrete strength for punching is the least of the three values
The critical section for flexure is at the face of the column
3. q
cup
a )
= 0.8 (0.20 + -
U
d Ii (
...E!!..
Yc
= 0.8 0.20 + 4x1.23
6.535
)Jg5
- = 3.68 N I mm
1.5
2
Mu = 2414.2xO.845-1.4x25x1.3x . 2 X --=1910.6 N.m
3
ci
qcup= 1.53 N/mm2 g.
U
II.l
=a
I
I===k---·J:'ue load=
Since q up <q cup , the thickness of the pile cap is adequate for punching shear. y=o.845 2414.3
-- - ' - ' - ' - ' - ' -
Check of punching for individual piles ~
Mu=19 10.6
Pile load = 2414.3 kN
460
Example 5.12
Design and give complete reinforcement detailing for a pile cap that constitute a
part of a deep foundations system of an office building. Design data:
I I Solution
Step 1: Dimensions of the pile cap
Reinforcement details for the pile cap
In order to determine the dimensions of the pile cap, one has to determine the
number of piles.
' 7000xl.0S
N urnberof pI les = Un factored load of column x 1.0S S.44
Pile working load 13S0
Choose 6 piles. The multiplier LOS takes into consideration the won weight of
the pile cap.
The spacing between the piles is usually taken (2.5 <I> - 3 <1». In this example,
the spacing between piles is taken = 2.0m. The distance from the centerline of
the pile to the edge is taken 0.80 m. The plan dimensions of the pile cap are
shown in the following figure. The thickness of the pile cap shall be assumed
equal to 1.4 m.
Unfactored own weight ofthe pile cap = 2SxS.6 x 3.6 x1.4 = 70S.6 kN
461 462
Critical section 1-1
The distance between the e.G. of piles and the critical section for one-way
shear is more than d/2 (0.665). Hence, no reduction in pile loads.
-, I
-, ,
I I
,_ .... ,_ ....
I O.8m I 2.0m 2.0m I O.8m I
I,
....
,_....
, -
I
....
,_ ....I
,
I .. 1 ·1
0.665 1.535
3
Qu 3559 X 10 2
qu = b xd = 3600 x1330 0.74 N Imm
Qu =3 x reduced pile load - O.w. of pile cap outside of the critical section(hatched area)
d =1400 - 70 =1330 mm
The critical section for one-way shear is at df2 from the face of the column as Qu =3xl041.1-1.4x25x5.6xO.835x 1.4=2894.1 kN
shown in the following figure.
463 464
Step 2.2: Punching shear
; -... , ; - ... , ; - ... , The critical section for punching shear is at d/2 from the column face as shown
in the figure below.
I
,_ .... I I
,_ .... I I
,_ .... I ~ =c I +d = 600+1330= 1930mm =1.93m
Critical section bi =c 2 +d =1200+1330= 2530mm =2.53m
U =2x(a1 +b 1 )=2 (1930+ 2530)= 8920mm
O.665
I· . 1
f 0.835
Referring to figure, it can be noted that the areas the piles that are located inside
the critical punching area (A=45%) of two piles. According to the previous
procedure, the punching load could be calculated as follows:
5.6
Qu 2894.1 X 103
qu = b xd = 5600x1330 0.39 N / mm 2
Since qu<qcu, the thickness of the pile cap is adequate for one-way shear
o
00
1.40 o
2.0
Qup = (Co\umn load + O.W. of pile cap within the punching perimeter)- 2. A. pile load
466
465
The concrete strength for punching is the least of the three values: Section 1
Mu = 2· factored load of pile· x I - moment developed due to the O. W. of the
1. qcuP = 0.316 ~fcu = 0.316 {35 = 1.53N I mm 2 < 1.6 N I mm 2 hatched pile cap (=1.4x Yc xB xt xXw 2 12)
Yc VLs 1.2
xI =2.0- =1.40m
2. qc.up =0.316 (0.50+~)~fcu =0.316 (0.50+ 0.60) {35 =2.23N Imm 2 T
Yc 1.20 VLs XW =2.8-
1.2
=2.2 m
T
222
M u = 2xI914.6x1.4-1.4x25x3.6x1.4x-·- == 4934 kN.m
3. qcuP = 0.8 (0.20 + a d )/Jcu = 0.8 (0.20 + 4X1.33) {35 = 3.08 N I mm 2 2
VLs
U Yc 8.92
Since quP (qeup, the thickness of the pile cap is adequate for punching shear.
d=C 1
e
C 1 =6.72 ~
--
feu B
u
Take c/d=0.125 ~
1330=C
1
4934x10
35x3600
J = 0.825
6
A Mu 4934X106:::::12476 mm 2
Step 3: Design for flexure S fy.J.d 360xO.825x1330
The critical section for flexure is at the face of the column. There are two A /m = 9032.6 = 3465 mm 2 1m
critical sections: S 3.6
\ I \ I
" ./
.... _-' "_"
./
.....
'-
'--"
./ o
00
d
2.0 2.0
467 468
-r- -r-
Section 2
#12@250mm
Mu = 3· factored load of pile· x f - moment developed due to the O. W. ofthe
hatched pile cap ( =1.4 x Yc x B x t x x w 2 I 2 )
, 4
-
x =1.0- 0.6 =0.70m •
f
2 0
~
.-
Xw =1.8- 0.60 =1.5 m
•
2
1.5
. . . . 1-
Mu =3x1914.6x O.70-1.4x25x5.6x1.4x1.5x-=3877 kN.m V
2
~ 6 # 201m
1 6 #281m
3877x106
1330=C1 35x5600
Section A-A
C 1 =9.46 ~ Take cjd=0.125 ~ J = 0.825
6
A Mu 3877x10 =9802 mm 2
s fy.J.d 360xO.825x 1330
A~s jm = 9802
5.6
= 1750
mm
2 I
m <As min
2
Use As=As.min=2217 mm
!!
0
N
Choose 6 <l> 20 1m'
e
-
A \0
- A
;
...... \ ;
...... \ ; ...... ,
I I I I I
,_ .... I 6 <l> 281m'
Critical section 2-2
'-'" '-'"
Plan
I- 5.6
.I
470
469
STRUT· AND -TIE MODEL
6.1 Introduction
In a structure, forces tend to follow the shortest possible path to transfer loads.
In a beam subjected to concentrated loads, the shortest paths to transfer load are
the straight lines connecting the points of loading and the supports.
471
For deep beams, those shortest paths are possible paths, see Fig. 6.1a. The load 6.2 Principle of Band D Regions
is directly transferred to the supports through compression struts with
reasonable inclination. B-region
A portion of a member in which the Bernoulli hypothesis of plane strain
For slender beams, however, those shortest paths are not possible paths as . distribution is assumed to be valid.
shown in Fig. 6.1b. In such beams, the compression struts would be very flat. In
order to develop a vertical component that is large enough to equilibrate the Discontinuity
applied force, the actual force in the strut will be too large to cause concrete A discontinuity of the stress distribution occurs at a change in the geometry of a
crushing. Vertical web reinforcement (ties) provides possible paths, as shown structural element or at a concentrated load or reaction. St. Venant's principle
in Fig. 6.1d, since it increases the inclination of the struts. indicates that the stresses due to axial load· and bending moment approach a
linear distribution at a distance approximately equal to the overall height of the
CO!llparison between Fig. 6.1c and Fig. 6.1d indicates that the strut-a~d-tie rriember away from the discontinuity (See Fig. 6.2). For this reason,
model is a special case of the truss model in which no vertical ties are statIcally discontinuities are assumed to extend a distance h from the section where the
needed. load or change in geometry occurs.
D-region
It is the portion of a member within a distance equal to the member height h
Possible
path from the face of discontinuity. The plane section assumption is not valid in such
/
regions. Those disturbed portions are designated D-regions, where n denotes
/
/
/
, discontinuity or disturbance. Typical structures in which D-region behavior
dominates are brackets and deep beams.
Impossible
path
a)The shortest path in deep beam b)The shortest path in slender beam Figure 6.2 shows some typical D-regions. The regions between D-regions can
be treated as B-regions. At disturbed or discontinuous regions of a structure
such as comers, openings or concentrated loads and supports,plane sections do
not remain plane, and the behavior is very different from that in B-regions. In
such members the load carrying mechanism may be idealized as a truss made
A up of concrete compression struts and steel ties. Crushing of the concrete struts
/ ....
/ "- is one of the major failure modes for D-regions ~nd the ultimate load is very
/ "-
" , dependent on the compressive strength of concrete. Because. of transverse
tension and cracking in the region of the strut, an effective concrete strength
generally less than the cube strength, must be used in the design of the concrete
crStrut and tie model for deep beam d) Truss model for slender beam
strut.
472 473
D-Region D-Region D-Region
1 B- Near openings
E- Beam column joint
D-Region
D-Region
D-Region D-Region
F- Deep beam
D- Tapered beam
G- Short cantilever
474 475
6.3 Components of the Strut- and -Tie Model The strut-and-tie shown in Fig. 6.3 can fail in one of three ways:
• The tension tie could yield.
The Strut-and-Tie model consists of: • One of the struts could crush when the stress in the strut exceeds the
effective compressive strength of concrete. .
• Major diagonal compression diagonals (struts) • A truss node could fail by being stressed .greater than the effectIVe
• Tension ties (or Ties) compressive strength of concrete.
• Truss nodes.
Since a tension failure of the steel will be more ductile than either a strut failure
p or a node failure, a deep beam should be proportioned so that the strength of the
Truss node steel governs.
According to the Strut-and-Tie Model shown in Fig. 6.3, the shear strength can
be calculated as:
Q =Astrut f.ce sinB ................................. ·········(6.1)
Compression
strut where A strut is the cross sectional area of the strut, f~e is the effective
compressive strength of concrete and B is the angle of inclination of the strut.
force, T
In Fig. 6.3, the concentrated load, P, is resisted by two major inclined diagonal
struts, shown by the light shaded areas. The horizontal component of the force
in the strut is' equilibrated by a tension tie force, T. The three darker shaded
areas represent truss nodes. These are wedges of concrete loaded on all sides
except the side surfaces of the beam with equal compressive stress. The loads,
reactions, struts, and ties in Fig. 6.3 are all laid out such that the centroid of
each truss member and the line of action of all externally applied loads coincide
at each joint.
Photo 6.2 A Cable-stayed bridge during construction
477
476
The validity of a Strut-and-Tie model for a given member depends on whether 6.4 Design of the Struts
the model represents the true situation. Concrete beams can undergo a limited
In the design using Strut-and-Tie models, it is necessary to check that crushing
amount of redistribution of internal forces. If the chosen Strut-and-Tie model
requires excessive deformation to reach the fully plastic state, it may fail of the compressive struts does not occur. The cross-sectional area of the
prematurely. compressive struts is highly dependent on the details at their ends.
An example of an unsuitable model is given in Fig. 6.4 that shows a deep beam 6.4.1 Idealization of the Strut
with two layers of longitudinal reinforcement. One layer is located at the The most common types of struts utilized in design are:
bottom and the other at' mid-depth. A possible Strut-and-Tie model for this
beam consists of two trusses, one utilizing the lower reinforcing steel as its PRISMATIC STRUT
tension tie, the other using the upper reinforcing steel. For an ideally plastic
Struts could be idealized as prismatic compression members
material, the capacity would be the sum of the shears transmitted by the two
(prismatic struts) as shown by the straight line outlines of the
trusses Q1 + Q2. It is clear, however, that the upper layer of reinforcing steel struts in Fig. 6.3. it.
has little effect on strength. When this beam is loaded, the bottom tie yields
first. Large deformations are required before the upper tie can yield. Before TAPERED STRUT
these can fully develop, the lower truss will normally fail. If the effective compression strength at the two ends of the strut
differs due to different bearing lengths (See Fig. 6.5), the strut is
idealized as a uniformly tapered compression member (tapered
strut).
~ p
"', ,
Truss node
///
/
" ,
'/
// /
- -, .......
/
"" ,
Tapered
/
1/
II
~ -- "
Fig. 6.5 Tapered strut.
Fig. 6.4 Invalid Strut-and-Tie model
478 479
BO'ITLE-SHAPED STRUT
p
Is a strut located in a part of a member where the width of the
compressed concrete at mid-length of the strut can spread
laterally. The curved solid outlines in Fig. 6. 6 approximate the
boundaries of the bottle-shaped struts. A split cylinder test is an
example of a bottle-shaped strut. The spread of the applied ~ Idealized
(a)
Bottle-shaped
strut \
Crack
Local strut
Fig. 6.6 Bottle shaped strut:(a) bottle-shaped strut in a deep beam, ~b)cracking of
a bottle~shaped strut; (c) strut-and-tie model of a bottle-shaped strut
Photo 6.3 Double short cantilevers supporting a composite bridge
481
480
6.4.2 Strength of Un-reinforced Struts
The compressive strength of an un-reinforced strut (Fe) shall be taken as the
smaller value of the compressive strength at the two ends, given as:
Fe = fed' Ae ................................................... (6.2) Strut
where
Ae =cross-sectional area of the strut at the strut end under consideration
fed =the smaller of (a) and (b):
(a) The effective compressive strength of the concrete in the strut;
I
(b) The effecti ve compressive strength of concrete in the nodal zone.
482 483
If the value of f3. =0.70 specified in Table 6.1 is used, the axis of the strut shall 6.4.3 Strength of Reinforced Struts
be crossed by reinforcement proportioned to resist the transverse tensile force In order to increase the strength of the strut, it is permitted to reinforce it with
resulting from the compression force spreading in the strut as shown in Fig. 6.8. compression reinforcement that satisfies the following requirements:
Otherwise, one has to use f3. =0.60.
•. The compression reinforcement should be placed within .the strut and
The designer may use a local strut-and-tie model to compute the amount of parallel to its a x i s . ' .
transverse reinforcement needed in a given strut. In the American Concrete • The reinforcement should be properly anchored.
Institute Code (ACI 318) , for concrete strengths not exceeding 40 N/mm2, the satisfying the
requirement is considered to be satisfied if the axis of the strut being crossed by
• The reinforcement should be enclosed in ties or spirals
conditions applied to columns.
layers of reinforcement satisfies the following equation:
An example of a deep beam with reinforced struts is given in Fig. 6.9. The
I Asi sin Yi ~ 0.003 ................................. (6.4)
strength of a reinforced strut is given by: .
b Si
Fc =Ac f cd +As f Y lys ................................ ··(6.5)
where Asi is the total area of reinforcement at spacing Si in a layer of 0.67feu R
reinforcement with bars at an angle Yi to the ax.is of the strut. Where fed = p,
Ye
Y. = 1.3 , Ye = 1.6, f3s is obtained from table 6.1, As is the area of the
reinforcing steel parallel to the direction of the strut and/yis the yield strength.
p
I
~ Strut
~
/
/
Stirrups
S2 Reinforced
strut
ain reinforcement
/
/
S1
.. I :fie force, T
485
484
6.5 Design of Ties 6.6 Design of Nodal Zones
strut
)-----C (---- T
I I
I I
I IC
C
~~
(b) C-C-T Node
(a) C-C-C Node
--r---/.,.------------..
/ e
-Tie
T
I· T
487
486
6.6.2 Strength .of the Nodal Zones In order to determine the dimensions of nodes subjected to tension and
.compression (CCT or CIT), the height U of the tension tie can be calculated as
The compressive strength of a the nodal zone is given by follows:
• In case of using one row of bars without providing sufficient
~n =Aen . fJn (0.67/eu lYe) ...................................... (6.6) development length beyond the nodal zones (Fig. 6.13a):
in which
U =0 ............. :.................................. (6.7a)
Acn = the area of the face of the nodal zone taken perpendicular to the direction • In case of using one row of bars and providing sufficient development
of the strut. length beyond the nodal zones for a distance not less than 2c, where c is
'Yc = material strength reduction factor for concrete = 1.6. the concrete cover (Fig. 6.13b):
fJn = factor that takes into account the stress conditions at the nodal zone U = ffJ+ 2c ........................................... (6.7b)
Where tj> is the bar diameter.
Table 6.2 Values of fJn
• In case of using more than one row of bars (Fig. 6.13c) and providing
Type of Node fJn sufficient development length beyond the nodal zones for a distance not
C-C-C 1.0 less than 2c, where c is the concrete cover:
U :;::rp+2c+(n-l)s .................................. (6.7c)
C-C-T* 0.80
Where n is number of bars and s the center line distance between bars.
C-T-T orT-T-T 0.60
strut strut
* In C-C-T nodes, the value f3n = 1.0 can be utilized if the tie is extended
through the node and is mechanically anchored as shown in Fig. 6.12
Tie
s
I /
Tie u
¢ /
c t /
Figure 6.14-a shows a simply supported deep beam that supports two planted []\
.. ...
~
columns and contains two web openings. The locations of the openings do not
interfere with shortest load path between the loads and the supports. Hence, a
simple Strut-and -Tie model, similar to that developed in a solid deep beam,
can be proposed. It should be noted that the existence of the openings might
limit the width of the strut.
Figure 6.14-b shows a simply supported deep beam that supports two planted
a) Deep beam with symmetrical openings
columns and contains two web openings. The locations of the openings
interfere with shortest load path between the loads and the supports. Hence, the
vertical load of each column has to travel around the opening. Accordingly, a
tie has to be located above the openings, together with the traditional one
located at the bottom part of the beam.
Figure 6.14-c shows a deep beam having an opening near the left-hand side
"-
support. The beam supports a planted column. The Strut-and-Tie model for
such a beam is developed based on engineering judgment about how the force /
I
/
.. ... "\
\
0
paths might flow around the opening. The model demonstrates that the main
reinforcement of the beam shall follow the directions of the ties. The designer
should provide light reinf9rcement mesh on both sides of the beam to control
cracking and to enhance the performance of the struts.
/
/
0.. ... ,
\
Figure 6. 14-d shows a deep beam that is bottom loaded through two hangers. A
simplified Shut-and-Tie model that is suitable fur design is also shown. It is
assumed that the bottom load is transferred to the beam by bond stresses
f I)
between the vertical stirrups, that hang-up the load, and the concrete.
b) Deep beam with openings interfering with the shor~est load path.
Figures 6.14-e-f-g show Strut-and-Tie models for cantilever and continuous
beams subjected to different loading conditions ..
Fig. 6.14 Typical Strut-and-Tie applications.
491
490
.... _--- "..."\
"... \
/ \ "... \
\
//0 0\\ \
. ... \
\
f II
a) Deep beam with symmetrical openings c) Deep beam with an eccentric opening
-----
/ "- /1-1'\
I
L. ... ... ~
\ / I I \
I
I
0.. 0
...
\
\ /
/ I I \
\
t
f 11 --'-
hanger hanger
Fig. 6.14 Typical Strut-and-Tie applications. Fig. 6.14 Typica~ Strut-and-Tie applications (cont.)
L -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- - - - - - .
492 493
Example 6.1
A transfer girder supports two planted columns, each having a factored load of
1500 kN as shown in the figure given below. The material properties are
I leu =30N Imm 2 and Iy = 400N Imm 2 • Design the beam using the Strut-and-
/ Tie method presented in the ECP 203.
/
/ 1500kN 1500 kN
./ - I-r- -r-
/ \ / H
450
/ \ /
/ \ /
/
.. . \ / . Step 1: Check bearing capacity at loading points and at supports
fI If The area of the cross section of the column is (450 mm x 500 mm). The bearing
stresses at points loading and at supports are:
I = Pu = 1500xlOOO = 6.66 N I mm 2
b Ae 450 x 500
1) Deep beam having a cantilever with two concentrated loads
The nodal zones beneath the loading locations are (C-C-C) Nodes. The
effective compressive strength of such type of nodes (~n=1.0) is limited to:
Fig. 6.14 Typical Strut-and-Tie applications (cont.) /eu =0.67xl.Ox 30 =12.56 N Imm 2
led =0.67xfJn X
Ye 1.6
494 495
The nodal zone over the support location is a compression-tension (C-C-T) To minimize ws, strut force BC, Fu •BC must equal its capacity as follows:
Node. The effective compressive strength of this node (Pn=0.80) is limited to:
I cd = 0.67 x Pnx lcu = 0.67 x 0.80 x 30 = lO.05 N I mm 2 ~ .Be = 0.67 x fJ. x lcu bw s where Ps=1.0 for prismatic struts
Yc
Yc . 1.6
Since the applied bearing stresses (6.66 N/mm2) are less than the limiting To minimize WI. the force in the tie ~.AD must reach the node capacity to
values at the loading locations and at the supports, the area of contact is anchor the tie as follows:
considered adequate
Fu AD = 0.67xps xlcu bw I' where Ps=0.80 for (C-C-T) node
Step 2: Establish the Strut-and-Tie model . Yc -
To fully utilize the beam, the positions of these nodes have to be as close to the Pu xLx = ~.BC xjd
top of the beam. In other words, the lever arm (jd) of the force couple must be
set to the maximum and this means that the width of strut BC, wS , and the width Pu xLx = 0.67 x fJ. x lcu bw s (t-1.125w.)
of the tie AD, WI, must be minimum. Yc
1500kN 1500 30
1500 (1000) x1900 = 0.67x1.0x- 500w s (2200-1.125 W s)
1.6
I I
The previous equation is quadratic in Ws. Solving for Ws gives:
i 1900 2200 1900 i
I I
W s = 234.3mm
!
I ..~~- - F:S: -- -~, , !
I WI = 1.25 W s =1:25 x 234.3 = 292.9mm
.. ..
..
I
I ,, I
I Choose W s = 250 mm and w, = 300 mm
,,
.. .
I /. I
I , I The depth of the deep beam equals:
~;J
I
. Fu,AD
(e''''~
W 300
d =t - - I = 2200--= 2050mm
2 2
The distance jd equals:
.
1500
t
6000mm I 1500 . wsw I 250 300
Jd =t ----=2200----=1925mm
2 2 2 ' 2
496 497
Step 4: Design the nodal zones and check the anchorages
I The 90° standard hook is used to anchor tie AD. The required anchorage is
i Lx=1900 given by:
L _af37]/ y l rs
d - 4/ rp
bu
Ld can also be directly obtained from the tables provided in the ECP 203.
FU,AD
The Egyptian code requires measuring the development length from the point
where the centroid of the tie reinforcement leaves the nodal zone and enters the
1500 I span. However, for simplicity, it can be measured from the end of the column.
The distance from the column to the end of the beam is about 400 mm as shown
in figure below and the bent part is about 850 mm.
~I
The angle of the strut AB equals:
4 cP25
0= tan-I (jd) = tan-I (1925) = 45.37°
Lx 1900
F
u,AB
=~= 1500x1000 =2107.6 kN
sinO sin45.37
r;; 5 cP25
498 499
1500kN 1500
450
1900 2200 1900
B
1500 1500
6000mm
c=450 The minimum vertical web reinforcement required by the code is given by:
A,'V = 0.0025 b s
The minimum horizontal shear reinforcement required by the code is given by:
The width at the bottom of the strut is given by: AVh = 0.0015 b s
W sb = c sin 8 +W t cos 8 Choose s =200 mm
W sb = 450sin 45.37 + 300 cos 45.37 = 531.01 mm Asv = 0.0025 500 (300) = 250 mm 2
Ws is taken as the smaller of Wsb and Wst For one leg, Asv = 125 mm 2 ----+ A,./or <I> 14 = 154 mm 2
The Strut AB is expected to be a bottle-shaped strut. By assuming that
Choose <l> 14 @ 200 mm
sufficient crack control reinforcement is used to resist the bursting force in the
2
strut (l3s=0.7), the capacity of strut AB is limited to: ASh =0.0015b (300)=mm
fcu
F" ,AB = 0.67 x fJs x b Ws For one leg, ASh = 150mm 2 ----+ As for <I> 10 = 78.5 mm 2
Yc
30 Choose <l> 10 @ 200 mm
FU,AB =O.67xO.7x- 500x495.89 = 2180.36 kN
1.6
The arrangement of the reinforcement is shown in the following figure.
Because this is higher than the required force, strut AB (or CD) is considered
adequate.
500 501
r WWOOG@V~¢P Example 6.2
Give a complete design for the bracket shown in figure using the Strut-and-Tie
. wwooc:c: 'I
~ method presented in the ECP 203 according to the following data:
~~IIJ!
~
'§, cl
C') <U
2
00 feu =30N Imm 2 andfy =400N Imm
E
E
EV
E
tlllO
I:'! I:'!
~
0
0
I:'!
0
0
I:'!
"<tLO Factored vertical load Qu =240 leN
@J @J
"<t 0 Factored horizontal load Nu = 56 leN
~ :i
E I~ ~
E
o Pu=1450 leN
~
@J < <
o
Qu=240 leN 200 200 Qu=240 leN
I
..,
!:5
==
....= Nu =56 leN
<U 1..-==--. --01.....- Nu =56 leN
l"r "Q
....
I
=
<U
e o
:8 -'-
E
E
LO
I:'!
LO
I:'! ,..
<U
CJ
o
0
0
'§, '§, oS o«)
"<t 10
0
<0 ,S<U
10
I:'! ~
I:'!
'§, I:'! .-I
en '§, I.C
f-
~
C')
I
f;;r;l
....ei>
~
E
I- -I- -I- ~I
-E
o 400 500mm· 400
o
0) < <
-'--
I I I I
1~
Colurim cross-section
502 503
Step 1: Determine the bearing plate dimensions F",BC =fed b W s
The nodal zone underneath the bearing plate is a compression-tension (C-C-T) 1450
node (130=0.80). The effective compressive strength of this node is limited to: F",BC = 240 + -2- = 965 kN
f 30 . The nodal zone B is an all compression (C-C-C) node and strut CB is of
fed =0.67xfJn x--E!...=0.67xO.8x-=1O.05N Imm 2
Ye 1.6 prismatic type, the effective compressive strength/cdis given by:
A = S1... = 240 x 1000 = 23880 mm 2 fed = 0.67 x fJn x feu =0.67xl.Ox 30 = 12.56N Imm 2
e fed 10.05 Ye 1.6
Choose a (300 mm x 150mm) bearing plate (Ac=45000 mm 2). 965x1000 = 12.56 x450xw s
Ws =170.7 mm
725 725
400 Bearing plate
(300 mm x 150 mm) Resultant line ,
125-1 I 1150 I 125 ,,
" D D'
,
,, 240
200
,
xz=11.67-1 '_,--0-1
a ,
:B -f-
56 ,,
a
a«) a-- 56
Or)
... , A'
I
I
I
I
I
t
...t'I
I
I
I
Step 2: Establish the Strut-and-Tie model I
I
The figure below shows the geometry of the Strut-and-Tie model. The location
of the tie AA' is assumed to be 50 rom from the top of the corbel.
d = 650 - 50 = 600 mm
As shown in the figure, 'the column axial load, Pu is resolved into two equal
loads acting in line with strut CB. The location of the centerline of strut CB can
be found by calculating its width, ws. This width can be obtained from:
504 505
The corbel is subjected to a vertical force of a value 240 kN and a horizontal
force of a value 56 kN. The resultant of these forces shall be used in Step 4: Select the tie reinforcement
establishing the Strut-and-Tie model. The direction of the resultant can be
F",AA' =As xfy Iys
obtained from the triangle of forces.
F",AA' = 174.8 kN
82 = tan-1 ( 56 ) = 13.130 174.8 X 1000 = As x400/1.15
240
I
I
I 0 Asmin = 0.03 fc.u bd = 0.03 X 30 x450x600 = 607.5mm
2
I ~ fy 400.
This fixes the geometry ofthe Strut-and-Tie model. Tb satisfy the stress limit of nodal zone A, the tie reinforcement must engage an
effective depth of concrete WI that can be obtained from:
Step 3: Determine the required truss forces fcu
FuAA ' =0.67xPn x bW t ---+---+Pn =0.80
, Yc
8 = tan-1( 600 ) = 63.66 0
30
200+ 11.67 + 170.7/2 174.8 x 1000 = 0.67xO.8x- 450 W t ---7 WI = 38.65 mm
1.6
FAB =~
. 8 = . -240
6 66 -- - 267.8 kN .......................................... (compressIOn)
. As shown in figure, this limit is easily satisfied because the nodal zone
sm sm 3. available is 2x50=100 mm.
FAA' = FAB cos8+ N u = 267.8 cos63.66 +56 = 174.82 kN ................. (tension)
Step 6: Check the struts
FBB , = FAB sin 8 = 267.8cos 63.66 = -118.8 kN ......................... (compression) Step 6.1: Strut AS
The following table summarizes the forces in all members. Note that positive Strut AB shall be checked based on the sizes determined by nodal zones A and
sign indicates tension and negative sign indicates compression. B. Other struts shall be checked by computing the strut widths and verifying
whether they will fit within the space available
Member AA' AB BB' CB BD fcu
F;,s =- 0.67 x Ps x b W sl
Force (kN) 174.8 -267.8 -118.8 -965.0 -725.0 Yc
Wst is taken as the smaller width at the two ends of the strut as shown in figure.
The width at the bottom of the strut can be accurately computed using
AutoCAD program as shown in figure below or approximately as follows:
506 507
W SI =ws sinO W = 170 sin 63.33 ~ = 152.98mm
sl W sl Step 6.2: Strut BD
fcu
Strut AB is expected to be a bottle-shaped strut. By assuming that sufficient Fu BD = 0.67 x fJ" x b W,. BD
. Yc '
crack control reinforcement is used to resist bursting force in the strut (138=0.7),
the capacity of strut AB is limited to ' 13s=1.0 (inside the column zone)
C C'
508 509
Step 7.2: Horizontal reinforcement Example 6.3
Design and give complete reinforcement detailing for a pile cap that constitutes
Ah = (As -An) a part of a deep foundations system using the Strut-and-Tie method. Design
data:
N 56x103
An =__ u_= =161.0 mm 2
=750 mrnX 750 mrn
i y Irs 400/1.15 Column dimensions
Unfactored dead column load = 2200 kN
Ah =0.50(A,. -An) =0.50(502-161) = 170.5 mm 2 Unfactored dead column load = 1100kN
Choose 4 closed stirrups with diameter = 10 mm (two branches) @ 200mm Pile diameter =500mm
Pile working load =750 kN
Ail =78.5x2x4 =628 mm > 170.5 mm (O.K.)
2 2
2
!cu =30N/mm
. d 600 = 360 N/mm2
A v g .spacmg = - - = - - = 200 mm -7o.k
n -1 4-1
h
Solution
6 12
Step 1: Arrangement of piles
The total loads acing on the pile cap are given by:
p . = 4840 =968 kN
UlpIle 5
Reinforcement details of the corbel
510 . 511
Step 2: Establish the Strut-and-Tie model
H~PU=4840kN The column load is divided into 5 equal loads of 968 kN each. Each of these
,.....-- loads is connected to the center of one pile through an inclined strut as shown in
the figure.
968 968
//
// F2'
,I,.
, I
I \
\
""
"" Fl
""
!
I I I / , I , ""
I I I Fl / , I , ""
I
/ 1 \ "
I I /
I I I /
/ I
/ I
I I I /
/
/ c 968t
625 i 1250 I 1250 i 625 , /
/
.:~~ / 968
3750 a /
968
The figure given below shows the cross-section of the column divided into 5
areas, each of them is connected to one strut. The area Al of the vertical strut
(Bottle -shaped strut) at the top node can be found from:
3
968 X 10
= ------;--- 110078 mm 2::::: (332 mm x 332 mm)
! ! ! 0.67xO.7x30j1.6
512 513
Step 3: Calculate the forces
Assume a clear concrete cover of 70 mm, and that the distance from the center-
line of the bottom tie to the bottom concrete fibers is 150 mm.
Assume that the thickness of the top horizontal s!ruts is 300 mm. Hence, the
distance between the bottom tie and top horizontal strut equals:
ec =1200-150-30012=900 mm
ab =ad = 1250-428.24/2 = 1035.88 mm
2
ac = .J1035.882 + 1035.88 = 1465mm
I· /
750
·1 e = tan -\ (ec 900)
- ) =tan -\ ( -
ac
- = 31 .56°
1465
The center of gravity (C.G.) of the area A2 can be easily obtained as shown in The force in the strut FJ 968 = 1849 kN
figure (calculations not shown). sin 31.56
c = 160.88mm The force in the tie is obtained as follows:
Xc =700-2xI60.88=428.24mm F(1C = 1<; cose = 1849xcos31.56 =1575.6 kN
It is assumed that the center-line of the inclined strut connects the C.G. of the F,ie = F(1C cos45 = 1575.6 cos 45= 1114kN
area A2 and the C.G. of the pile.
Similarly, F2=1114 kN (compressi on)
..
oc
The tie reinforcement can be obtained from the following equation:
1114x1000=As x360/1.15
o
Irl As = 3559 mm
2
Choose 8 <I> 25 mm in 2 layers -+ As = 3927 mm 2
{'-
750 A . = 0.6 x 1000 x 1100 = 1833 mm 2 1m' --t Use 8 <I> 181m'
S,mm 360
514 515
Step 5: Check the struts At top node
Required area of the strut at the top node
Step 5.1: Strut F1
At bottom node F;, = 0.67 x f3s xfeu AcsT
Ye
w, =2c +r/J
30
Since it has been assumed earlier that the distance from C.G. of the tie to 1849.2xlOOO =0.67xO.60x- AcsT
1.6
bottom outermost concrete fibers is 150 mm -+ Wt = 300 mm.
2
ACST = 245337.9 mm
W sb =c sine +W, cose
Assume that the diagonal struts are square in shape. The side dimensions of the
W sb = 500sin31.56 +300 cos31.56 = 517.3 mm
struts ( h2) can be obtained as follows:
The capacity of the inclined strut is given by:
h2 = .J245337.9 = 495.32mm
feu
Fes = 0.67 x /3,. x W sb xb . (b is the pile diameter)
Ye Step 5.2: Strut F2
A = 0.60 for bottle-shaped strut inclined with the cracks without special The top node is the node where the inclined struts, the horizontal top struts and
reinforcement the top load meet. At this node, the horizontal area A2 and the inclined area of
30 the inclined strut form parts of the nodes.
Fcs = 0.67xO.60x- x500x517.3 = 1949.6 kN
1.6 To calculate the thickness hI, an average width (h3) for the area A2 is used.
Because this is higher than the required force (1849 kN), strut Fl is considered Thus,
adequate.
h = A2 = 113069 = 228.2 mm
1849 3 h2 495.32
h2 = h3 sin e + hi cos e
495.3 = 228.2 sin 31.56 + hi cos 31.56
hi = 441mm
w,=300mm = F;, cos e = 1849xlOOOxcos 31.56 =7.2N Imm 2
fe hi xh 2 441x495.32
A
feu 2
f en =0.67x PRn x Y =0.67x1.0x 1.6
30 =12.56 N Imm
pile e
(1311 =1.0 for (C-C-C) node) .
516 517
r
j
- r-'-----,.---
#12 @ 250 mm : : ~I
I [~~.~.~=..;:::;
.~..:=
..~~
·;:··~3~:7~...:;: .. . ...;=..=~
, ]
Plain concrett~ I I I- V I
dX
I 8iY'25I I
I I I
F,COS e _
I
'--~ __ _
I
~L-_ __ _
I
_ L - '---
8# 181m
I {\ j1 r'\ 8# 181 m
I
8# 25
J
8# 181 m
J
Step 6: Reinforcement arrangement
Section 6-7-1-4 of the ECP 203 states that when the Strut-and-Tie model is
used for designing pile caps, the tie reinforcement must be distributed in a
distance greater than three times the pile diameter if the distance between the
centerlines of the piles is more than 3D where D is the pile diameter.
In this example, the distance between the centerlines of the piles is less than 3D.
The reinforcement of the tie is arranged such that the distance between the bars
is 100 mm (the minimum accepted distance).
Reinforcement Details
Other locations should .be reinforced with the minimum reinforcement
calculated in Step 5.
518 519
7
INTRODUCTION TO
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
7.1 Introduction
The idea of 'prestressing was introduced to overcome the main disadvantage of
concrete which is the low tensile strength. Introducing compressive longitudinal
force, called prestressing, prevents the cracks from developing by reducing or
even eliminating the tensile stresses at critical sections. Thus, prestressing is a
technique of introducing compressive stresses of a pre-determined magnitude
520
into a structural member to improve its behavior. Therefore, all sections can
reach the full capacity of concrete in compression.
Although prestressed concrete has many benefits, it requires more attention to
specific design considerations that are not usually considered in construction of
ordinary reinforced concrete. .
Prestressed concrete is used in buildings, towers, tanks, underground structures,
and bridges. The wide spread use of prestressing is mainly due to the new
technology of developing high strength steel or fiber reinforced plastics (FRP)
and the accumulated knowledge of computing the short and long-tenn losses.
Prestressing significantly reduce the dead weight of flexural members. The
small span-to-depth ratio accompanied by short construction time makes
prestressed concrete very attractive solution as a construction material.
The idea of prestressed concrete can be traced back to 1872, when P.H Jackson,
an engineer from California, USA, developed a prestressing system that used a
tie rod to build beams and arches from individual blocks. Early attempts of
prestressing were not successful because of prestressing losses over time. In
1920s, the concept of circular prestressing was introduced but with a little
progress because of the unavailability of high strength material that can
compensate the long-tenn losses.
Linear prestressing continued to develop in Europe especially in France through
the work of Eugene Freyssinet. In 1928 he proposed the use of high strength
steel to overcome the losses. P.W. Abeles of England introduced the concept of
partial prestressing. The work of T. Y. Lin of developing the load-balancing
technique simplifies the design process particularly in indeterminate structures.
Since 1950s, the number of buildings and bridges constructed of prestressed
concrete has grown enonnously.
x;; ... ~
girders.
Concrete is poured
(a) Concrete cast and cured .
Fig. 7.1 A Pre-tensioned beam during manufacturing Fig. 7.2 A post-tensioned beam
523 524
7.3 General Design Principle 7.4 Materials
Flexural stresses in prestressed members are the result of internal prestress'
forc e P, th e l~
. t i d
erna moment ' cable configuration (P. e), and mg
ue to eccentnc the
7.4.1 Concrete
extern.al apphed mome~ts (M). The prestressing force results in stresses that are The Egyptian Code ECP 203 presents an idealization for the stress-strain curve
OPP.oslte to those resu~tmg from the e~ternal loads. The entire section is mainly of concrete in compression. The initial part of the curve is a parabolic curve up
s~bJ~cte? to compresslOn stresses and IS free from cracks. Fig. 7.3 illustrates the to a strain of 0.002 and the second part is a straight horizontal line up to a strain
dIstributIOn of the stresses at mid-span. It is clear that the tensile stresses that of 0.003, as shown in Fig. 7.4. Referring to Fig. 7.4, the equation of the
result fr~m the applied loads are eliminated by the compressive stresses due to concrete stress (fc) in terms of the concrete strain (Ec) can be expressed as:
prestressmg
_.-._._.-.-._.-.-.-._.-._._._._._.-._.-._._._.-.
* 0.67 feu
P-~~=========================t~p~
e h
were 1.e=
Ye
To take the full advantages of prestressed concrete, concrete with high
I· L
·1 compressive strength is usually used. The ECP 203 specifies the concrete grade
a- Loading that should be used in prestressed concrete as shown in Table 7.1
Table 7.1 Concrete compressive strength used in prestressed concrete
pxe (N/mm 2)
_E +-- M
A Zwp
Z/oP I Concrete grade I 30 135 145 150 155 160
_E _pxe
+-
M resultant
A Zim/ Zbo/
Beam prestressing eccentricity external loads resultant
b -Stresses
o 0.001 0.002 0.003
525 526
The advantages of using high-strength concrete in prestressed concrete 7.4.3 Prestressing Reinforcement
construction can be summarized in the following points: Prestressing reinforcement is available in different forms such as cold drawn
1. Due to its speed in gaining strength, the shattering can be removed wires, cables, and alloyed steel bars. The most common type of prestressing
faster reducing time and cost. reinforcement is the seven wire strands cable as shown in Fig. 7.6. The ultimate
tensile stnmgth of these cables is several times that of non-prestressing
2. It minimizes losses in prestressing force by reducing creep, elastic
reinforcement. For example, the ultimate strength· bf wires and cables ranges
shortening and shrinkage.
from 1700-1900 N/mm2 (about 4-5 times that of high grade steel). This high
3. It reduces the size and weight of the member. strength is attributed to adding alloying elements (manganese and carbon), and
4. It reduces the required area for shear reinforcement. by the use of heat treating and tempering. The favorable high tensile strength is
accompanied by a loss of ductility and toughness. Therefore steel reinforcement
5. It produces the high bond strength required to anchor the strands used with yield point above 1900 N/mm2 is not commonly used because of their
in pre-tensioned construction. extremely brittle nature. . .
7.4.2 Non-prestressing Reinforcement A typical stress-strain relation for prestressing reinforcement is shown in Fig.
7.6. It is clear that the prestressing steels lack a sharply defined yield point.
The behavior of the non-prestressing steel reinforcement is idealized by the Therefore, most codes including the ECP 203, specifies the yielding point as the
Egyptian code as an elasto-plastic material as shown in Fig 7.5. The reinforcing stress associated with a 1% strain. For high strength bars, the yield strength is
steel stress can be calculated using Eq. 7.2. frequently specified as the stress associated with the intersection of the curve
and a line parallel to the initial slope starting at strain of 0.002. The yield stress
Is = Es xEs when Es <EylYs
................................... (7.2) Ipy for stress relieved steel equals to approximately 85% of/pu and equals to 90%
Is = Iy Iys when Es ? Ey I Ys of/Pll for low relaxation steel.
The modulus of elasticity Eps can be taken as 200 GPa (200,000 N/mm2) for
bars and wires and 180 GPa (180,000 N/mm2) for strands.
Iylys --
Strand or wires
I: I
I
tension
<,.!?, I
I
en
~
CI)
t/ys
t:Il
Ii I
I
I
I
Es=200,OOO N/mm2
~
en
til
~
J-~ ____-/Pll
High-strength bars
I
CI)
I
I ty/ys Strain, ts
I
I
I
I
compression
U
I
t-- -/ylrs
~
7.5.1 "Introduction
tendon The applied prestressing force after jacking undergoes a number of reductions.
Some of these reductions occur immediately and others occur over a period of
time. Therefore it is important to establish the level of prestressing at each
loading stage as shown in the diagram below. Following the transfer of force
from the jack to the member, a loss in tendon stress ranging from 10-15% of the
initial force occurs.
(a) 7-wire monostrand tendon (b) Multi-strand tendon tendon Prestressed losses can be categorized in two groups.
Immediate losses: These are the losses "that occur during fabrication, including
elastic shorteningLlfpe' anchorage loss LlfpA and frictional losses Llfpj.
Time-deponent losses: These are the losses that increase over time, including
creep Llfper' shrinkage Llfpsh ' and steel relaxation LlfpR .
Immediate Time-dependent
losses losses
--------------~) Pi --------------~) Pe
Jacking Prestressing Final or effective
force force immediately prestressing force
(c) single bar tender (d) Multi-wire tendon after transfer
sheath
Pretensioned members
LlfpT = Llfpe + Llfpsh + Npcr + LlfpR .......................•...... (7.3)
wed'ge
ancborhead
Post-tensioned members
529 530
where 7.5.2 Anchorage Slip Losses (A)
NpA = anchorage slip losses At transfer in post-tension construction, when the jack is released, a small
amount of tendon shortening occurs because of the anchorage fitting and
J1fpe = Elastic shortening losses
movement of the wedges. The magnitude of this slip is function of the
Npw = wobble friction losses anchorage systeni and specified by the manufacturer. It usually varies from 2-6
N = curvature friction losses mm. From Hook's law, the loss of stress in the cable AhA due to slippage is
Pf
given by:
J1fpsh = shrinkage losses
J1fpcr = creep losses J1fpA =~Ep ................................................ (7.5)
L
NpR = steel relaxation losses
In the following sections, each type of losses is briefly discussed, and step by where
step examples for losses calculations are given. J1A = magnitude of slip
L = tendon length (the horizontal distance can be used)
Ep = modulus of elasticity of the prestressing steel
The loss in prestressing steel stress due anchorage slip is inversely proportional
to the length of the cable. Hence, the loss of stress due to slippage decreases as
the length of the cable increases. At, transfer, if the tendon can be stressed by
additional increment of length equal to the predicted anchorage slip without
overstressing the cable, the loss in stress due to slippage can be eliminated.
531 532
For post-tensioned members, the calculations of the elastic shortening losses is
7.5.3 Elastic Shortening Losses(e)
more complicated because the losses vary with the greatest losses occurring in
When the prestressing force is transferred to the concrete, the concrete shorten the first strand stressed and the least losses occurring in the last strand stressed.
and part of ,the prestressing is lost. To establish the loss of tendon stress due to For this reason the ECP 203 requires that for post-tensioned members to use
elastic shortening, we shall consider the defonnations of pre-tensioned member only half the value calculated for pre-tensioned members as follows:
stressed by a tendon at the centroid of the beam (Fig, 7.8). Since the concrete
1 Ep
and the tendon are fully bonded, the strain experienced by concrete must equal 111'pe
!l
=--f.
2E.
(forpost-tensionedmembers) .......... (7.1O)
PCI
to that in the prestressing steel. This compatibility of strain can be expressed as: CI
after shortening
L
-I Furthermore, the code permits combining the wobble and the curvature losses
in one formula by approximating the logarithmic relation by straight line given
by:
Fig. 7.9 Wobble friction losses
P, =~ (1 +X+ ~;,X}} ................................ (7.16)
7 .5.5 Curv~ture Friction Losses (F)
This type of losses is also limited to post-tensioned members. The resulting loss With the condition that the looses is less than 20%:
is due to the friction between the cables and the duct. These friction losses are a
function of the curvature of the tendon axis and the roughness of the X
k ·x+ fl' ):=::;0.20 ........................................... (7.17)
surrounding material. As a result, the force in the tendon decreases with the ( rps
distance from the jack. If a certain force is required at any desired section, the
friction force between that section and the jack must be estimated and added to
Thus the total frictional losses in this case equal:
the required force to establish the jacking force. It should be noted that the
maximum frictional losses occur at the far end of the beam. Although, friction
losses vary along the beam span, such calculation is not usually performed and fl'X) ....................................... (7.18)
I1fp(w+J)=Po k·x+--
(
the maximum value is used. rps
or
The ECP 203 gives the following formula to estimate the force at distance x
produced by jacking force Po as follows: I1fp(w+J) = Po -Px ............................................... (7.19)
Px
-P.x) ........................................................ (7.13)
= Po·e(-;;:
535 536
Differentiating the previous equation gives the angle ex. at any point.
P Assuming the curvature of the tendon is based on that of circular arc, then
P L"" rps ·8
x L L2
rps <"'- = - - ........................................... (7.26)
8 811m
y = a( x - ~r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7.20)
Approximately 80% of the shrinkage takes place in the first year. The code
specifies an average value of the ultimate shrinkage in Code Table 2.8.A
according to the size of the member and the relative humidity. In cases where
the environmental factors are not known, the following table (7.2) is used
where a is a constant to be evaluated by applying the boundary conditions
atx=O ~ y=l1m Table 7.2 Values of the shrinkage strain &11
L2 Prestressing system Shrinkage strain
11m = a
4 ................................................. (7.21) Pre-tensioned members (3-5 days after 300 x lO-o
casting)
4 11m Post-tensioned members (7-14 days after 200 x lO-o
a=U············ .. ··· .... ··· .... ·...................... (7.22)
casting)
y=4~m(x~.~r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7.23)
In case of stage construction, the code permits assuming that half the amount of
shrinkage occurs in the first month and 75% during the first six months. The
shrinkage losses are given by the following·equation:
537 538
Alpsh = Esh X Ep .••.....•...•...••.....•••••••..•.•.•.•....•.•.• (7.27)
7.5.7 Creep Loss (CR)
For post-tension members, the loss in prestressing force due to shrinkage is less Experimental research over the years indicates that deformations continue to
tha? that for pre-tensioned members. The code states that the only amount of increase over time. This deformation under constant longitudinal force is
shnnkage that needs to be considered is that occurred after transferring the termed creep. The amount of creep depends on the applied load, duration,
force to the member. properties of concrete, curing conditions, the age of element at first loading, and
environmental conditions. It should be emphasized that losses due to creep
result only from sustained loads during the loading history of the structural
element.
I '
Since the relationship due to creep is linear, it is possible to relate the creep
strain Ecr to the elastic strain Eel such that a creep coefficient $ can be defined as
The creep strain Ecr can be taken from Table 2-8-b in the code or from Table 7.3
in the absence of environmental factors. The value of the creep coefficient $
ranges from 1.5 to 3. The Egyptian code permits the use of $=2.0 for pre-
tensioned members and $=1.6 for post-tensioned members.
Photo 7.5 Prestressed concrete bridge during construction If the working concrete stresses at service loads is greater than 113 the concrete
strength !cu, the creep strain should be increased by the factor a determined
from Fig. 7.11. This increased strain value (E*cr) is given by the following
formula:
E*cr = Ecr·a •••..•••.••••••••••••••••••.•..•••••••.•••••.•... (7.29)
539 540
1.50 ,
7.5.8 Steel Relaxation Losses (R)
i
t$
4-<
1.25
1.00
----1J33 --r-l---+---
i
I
Relaxation is defined as the loss of stress under constant strain, while creep is
defined as the change in strain under constant stress. This type of losses occurs
under constant loading due to the elongation of the tendons with time. A typical
relaxation curve showing relaxation losses as a function of time for a specimen
0
Il)
that is initially loaded to 70% of its ultimate strength and held at a constant
::l strain, is shown in Fig. 7.12. The loss in stresses due to relaxation depends on
";
> the duration and the ratio of initial prestressed/pi to the yield strength/py.
0.75
100
0.50
'"
0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 !5'"
'"
~
:-2 10
!clfcu ~
L------
----
.8
4-<
0
Fig. 7.11 Values of a with respect to concrete stress ~
'"
.s'" 1.0
Another formula for determining creep losses for bonded prestressed members '"'"
t1)
0.1
llfpcr = ¢:p fes ............................................... (7.30)
e
10 100 1000 10000
where Ep = the prestressing steel modulus of elasticity. Time (hours)
Ec = the concrete modulus of elasticity.
!cs = the stress in concrete at the level of centroid of the prestressing Fig. 7.12 Typical stress relaxation losses .
tendons.
In general, this loss is a function of the stress in the concrete at the section
being analyzed. The ECP 203 expression forfcs is; The ECP 203 gives the following equation to estimate the relaxation losses:
541 542
This relationship is applicable only when the ratio /Pi/fpy is greater than 0.55. If a Example 7.1: Calculations of losses for a pre-tensioned beam
step-by-step loss analysis is necessary, the loss increment at any particular
loading stage can be determined from: The prestressed beam shown in the figure below is pre-tensioned. Calculate
the prestressing losses knowing that the beam is prestressed with normal
!Pi x (logt 2-10gt1) (!Pi ) . relaxation stress relieved tendons.
I1!PR = --0.55 ................. (7.34) (Note: calculate relaxation losses after 200 days) ,
kl !py
Data
where t1 is the time at the beginning, and t2 is the time at the end of interval
iF = 1360 N/mm2
from jacking to the time being considered.
Aps = 2097 mm22
feu = 40 N/mm
Examples 7.1 and 7.2 illustrate the procedure for calculating the losses in feui = 30 N/mm2
pretensioned and post-tensioned beams respectively.
Ep = 190000 N/mm2
Cover =100 mm
Un factored super-imposed load =4 kN/m'
1 1
L =22m
L 1- 700 -1
TT8
200 I
150-
,I
I-
T §
00
1l l e 200 I
T 1- 700 -1
Beam cross section
543 544
The initial prestressing stress JPi equals to the prestressing stress after the
Solution
occurrence of immediate losses.
Step 1: Calculation of elastic shortening losses 2
f pI. = f p -I:1F
~ pe
= 1360-98.06 =1261.94 N Imm
The cross sectional area (A) equals:
= xA = 1261.9 x 2097 =2646.4 K.N
A = 2x700x200+800x150 =400000 mm 2 P; fpi ps 1000
Since the section is symmetrical; Ytop = Ybottom= 600 mm 2646.4 x 1000 2646.4x1000x500x500 605xl0 x500
6
545 546
The total losses can be summarized in the following table
Example 7.2: Step by step computation of losses in post-
Type of loss Stress (N/mm2 ) Percent of total losses tensioned beam
A simply supported post-tensioned beam is shown in the figure below.
2
The area
Elastic shortening losses 98.08 27.22% 2
of the prestressing tendons is 1200 mm and .t;,u=1900 N/mm • Compute the
prestressing losses at the critical section of the peam' at 100, days knowing that
Shrinkage losses 132.46 36.76% normal stress relieved strands are used inside steel ducts. ' .
._.-.-.-._._.-.-._._._._.
22m
I- ·1
2
Aps=1200 mm
80mm
400mm
547 548
Solution Step 4: Curvature friction losses
The radius of curvature rps can be approximated by:
Step 1: Calculate section properties
r ="'--=
e
222
=116.35 m
A = 400 x 1200 = 480000 mm 2 ps 8xe 8x(520/l000)
3 3
- b xt _ 400 x 1200 _ 576 1010 The stress after frictional losses equals:
I ---- -. x mm 4
12 12
px ) ( Oo3x22)
I = 5.76xlOlO = 96xl06 mm 3 P = P .e ( - r", = 1292e - 116.35 = 1220.75 N I mm 2
Zbo/ = Z/oP = -- 600 x2 0
Ybo/
Losses = 1292-1220.75 =71.25 N/mm2
e = 600-80 = 520 mm 2
Total frictional losses = iJ./pj= 90.47+71.25 =161.73 N/mm
= xA = 25x 480000 = 12kNlm'
woow Yc 1000000 Net force = Px= 1292-161.73 =1095.18 N/mm2
For normal relaxation stress relieved stands, the ECP 203 specifies the yield Alternative method
stress as:
fpy =0.85xfpu =0.85xI900=1615 N/mm2 . (
The quantlty a = k·x + - - = 0.0033x22+ 0.30X22)_ jl'X) (
- 0.1293
rps 116.35
The initial prestressing force at the time of jacking equals: Since this quantity a is less than 0.2, the net force after the frictional losses is
0.70 fpu =0.7xI900 = 1330 N/mm 2 px = P0 (1- a) = 1292(1- 0.1293) = 1124.9 N/mro
2
f = smaller of
0
EoCI = 4400Vi~
2
Step 2: Anchorage slip Losses cui
= 4400 .J26.25 = 22543.3N Imm
The strain due to anchorage slip iSEA = LlA = 4 =1.818xlO-4 At transfer, the beam self weight is the only acting moment that equals:
L 22 x 1000
2
The loss in stresses due to anchorage slip is given by: M = wow xl! = 12x22 = 726 kN.m
ow 8 8
LlfpA = EA X Eps = 1.818xlO-4 x 193000 = 35.09 N I mm 2
The tTotallosses including (anchorage + Wobble + friction losses) equals:
Step 3: Wobble friction losses 2
=35.09+ 161.73=196.82 N/mm
The code specifies k=0.0033 for normal conditions, thus the stress at the end of Net prestressing stress =1292-196.82 =1095.18 N/mm2
the beam equals:
_ = 1095.18x1200 =1314.22 kN
P"1 = p" . e-kx = 1292.e(-M033X22) = 1201.5 N I mm 2 P; - f pi xAps 1000
Losses = 1292-1201.525 = 90.47 N/mm2 The concrete stress at the level of the prestressing tendons is given by:
550
549
.=_p;_p;XeXe+MowXe Step 7: Calculation of shrinkage losses
f pel A I I
For post-tensioned beams, the shrinkage strain &sh is 200xW-6.
f .= 1314.22xWOO 1314.22xWOOx520x520 + 726 x 106 x 520
pel 480000 5.76 xl 010 ; 5.76xWlO Il.fpsh = csh xEp = 200xW-6 x 193000 = 38.6 N/mm 2
f pci = -2.35 N/mm 2 Step 4: Calculation of steel relaxation losses
K1=W for normal stress relieved tendons & t= 100 day = 100 x 24 =2400 hours.
The loss of prestressing force due to elastic shortening is given by:
The code requires calculating the relaxation losses at a time not exceeding 1000
Ep 193000 2 hours. Thus, t = 1000 hour.
Il.fpe = - f pci = 2.35=20.15 N Imm
Ed 22543.29
551 552
7.6 Anchorage Zones 7 .6.2 Stress Distribution
7.6.1 Introduction In post-tensioned concrete structures, failure of the anchorage zone is perhaps
the most common cause of problems arising during construction. Such failures
In prestressed concrete structural members, the prestressing force is usually are difficult and expensive to repair and might necessitate replacement of the
transferred from the prestressing steel to the concrete in one of two different entire member.
ways. In post-tensioned construction, relatively small anchorage plates transfer Anchorage zones may fail due to. uncontrolled cracking or splitting of the
the force from the tendon to the concrete immediately behind the anchorage by concrete from insufficient transverse reinforcement. Bearing failures
bearing. In pre-tensioned members, the force is transferred by bond between the immediately behind the anchorage plates are also common and may be caused
steel and the concrete. In either case, the transfer of the prestressing force OCcurs because of the inadequate dimensions of the bearing plates or poor quality of
at the end of the member and involves high local pressures and forces. concrete.
The length of the member over which the concentrated prestressing force Consider the case shown in Fig. 7.13 of a single square plate centrally
changes into a uniformly distributed over the cross section is called the transfer positioned at the end of a member of depth t and width b. In the region of length
length (in the case of pre-tensioned members) and the anchorage length (for La immediately behind the anchorage plate (i.e. the anchorage zone), plane
post-tensioned members). The stress concentrations within the anchorage zone sections do not remain plane and beam theory does not apply. High bearing
in a pre-tensioned member are not usually as sever as in a post-tensioned stresses at the anchorage plate disappear throughout the anchorage zone,
anchorage zone. In pre-tensioned beams, there is a more gradual transfer of creating high transverse stresses. The spreading of stress that occurs within the
prestressing. The prestressing force is transmitted by bond over a significant anchorage zone is illustrated in Fig. 7.13. The stress trajectories are closely
length of the tendon and there are usually a number of tendons that are well spaced directly behind the bearing plate where the compressive stresses are
distributed throughout the anchorage zone. In addition, the high concrete high, and become more widely spaced as the distance from the anchorage plate
bearing stresses behind the anchorage plates in post-tensioned members do not increases. In order to enhance the compressive strength of concrete, spiral
occur in pre-tensioned construction. Only post-tensioned concrete anchorage reinforcement is usually provided as shown in Fig. 7.14. The confinement of
zone are given attention in design and will be treated in details in this text. concrete due to the spiral reinforcement enhances its strength and ductility.
Stress trajectories
Prestressing -1-----
force - .If----_
I· ·1
Photo 7.6 Anchorage zone of a prestressed concrete beam Fig. 7.13 Idealized stress paths in end block with single load
553 554
grouting tube
spiralreinforcernent St Venant's principle suggests the length of the disturbed region for the single
centrally located anchorage is approximately equal to the thickness of the
member t. The high compressive stresses vanish after a short distance and
tensile stresses form as shown in Fig. 7.15. The transverse tensile forces (often
called bursting or splitting forces) need to be estimated accurately so that
transverse reinforcement within the anchorage zone _can be designed to resist
them.
Splitting
p :Tt
~ress __ ..J
1
...~~-Il1
Distance from
Compression loaded face
On the other hand, the stress trajectories for an eccentrically loaded member are
not equally spaced as shown in Fig. 7.16. The length of the disturbed zone La is
approximately equal to twice the distance of the prestressing force to the edge.
High bursting tensile stresses developed along the axis of the plate. Moreover,
end tensile stresses develop at the edge above the bearing plate. These tensile
stresses called the spalling stresses and are usually exist in eccentrically loaded
end zone.
Stress
trajectories Tension (spalling)
Compression
La
Photo 7.7 Anchorage zone in a bridge deck before and after .:ai>iing the concrete Fig. 7.16 Stress contours for an eccentric loading
555
556
7.6.3 Methods of Analysis
The design of the anchorage zone for a post-tensioned member involves both 7.6.3.2 Beam Analogy
the arrangement of the anchorage plates, to minimize transverse stresses, and An alternative model for estimating the internal tensile forces in the anchorage
the determination of the amount and distribution of reinforcement to carry the zone is to consider it as a deep beam loaded from one side by the bearing
transverse tension after cracking of the concrete. The ECP 203 states that the stresses immediately under the anchorage plate and resisted on the other side by
anchorage zone should be designed to withstand a force equals to 1.2 the the statically equivalent, linearly distributed stresses in the beam. The depth of
jacking force. the deep beam is taken as the anchorage length La.
The spreading of the prestressing forces occurs through both the depth and the The beam analogy model is illustrated in Fig. 7.18 for a single central
width of the anchorage zone and therefore transverse reinforcement must be anchorage, together with the bending moment diagram for the idealiz~d beam.
provided within the end zone in two orthogonal directions. The reinforcement Since the maximum moment tends to cause bursting along the axiS of the
quantities required in each direction are obtained from separate two- anchorage, it is usually denoted by Mb and called the bursting moment. .
dimensional analyses, i.e., the vertical transverse tension is calculated by By considering the free-body diagram of one-half of the end block, the burst.mg
considering the vertical spreading of forces and the horizontal tension is moment Mb required for the rotational equilibrium is obtained from statl~s.
obtained by considering the horizontal spreading of forces. The methods of Referring to Fig. 7.18 and taking moment about any point on the member axiS,
analysis are: one gets:
1. Strut-and-Tie method
2. Beam analogy
3. Finite element method
Mb =~ (~-~)= ~ (t-h) ....................................... (7.35)
7.6.3.1 Strut-and-Tie Method The lever arm between Cband Tb is approximately equal to tl2. Hence,
The internal flow of forces in each direction can be visualized in several ways.
A simple model is to consider truss action within the anchorage zone. For the
anchorage zone of the rectangular beam shown in Fig. 7.17, the truss analogy
Tb ~ ;~ =:(1-7). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7.36)
shows that transverse compression exists directly behind the bearing plate, with
bursting crack
transverse tension, often called the bursting force at some distance along the
member. The truss analogy can be used in T -beams for calculating both the
vertical tension in the web and the horizontal tension across the flange.
..£.
:. 112 • I h
114
wl
• P/2
~IT~
Side elevation Idealized Beam Bursting Moment
PI2_
hl2 112
h/4 - PI2-
~. .. P/2
114
Fig. 7.17 Strut and Tie model for an anchorage zone Fig. 7.18 Bursting moment at the end zone
558
Expressions for the bursting moment and the horizontal transverse tension
Example 7.3
resulting from the lateral dispersion of the bearing stresses across the width b
are obtained by replacing the thickness tin Eqs. 7.35 and 7.36 with the width b. The figure given below shows the anchorage zone of a flexural member. The
square bearing plate is 315 mm x 315 mm with a duct diameter of 106 mm. It is
to design such an anchorage zone according to the beam theory
Data
Pj= 3000kN
= 60 N/mm2 2
feu
h = 280N/mm
480
• 1
r-.--------.., _.-.
I·
342.5
Photo 7.8 Increasing beam width at the anchorage zone area 315 --
3000KN
9.52KN/rnrn 6.25KN/rnrn
Mb=61.9 kN.rn
480
J
Bursting in the horizontal plane
Bursting in the vertical plane
561 562
The amount of horizontal transverse reinforcement equals: Example 7.4
J
A = Tb = 258.0xlO 1611 mm 2 The figure given below shows the anchorage zone of a T-beam. The jacking
2
sb Is 160 force equals 2000kN,/y=280 N/mm2, and the concrete strength is 60 N/mm .
Design the anchorage zone using:
Such an amount is required within the length of the beam located between 96 • Beam analogy
mm (0.2 t) and 480 mm (1.0 t) from the loaded face. Try 2-12 mm stirrups.
• Strut-and-Tie method
Asb =4x112=448 mm 2
1000
. 1611
The number of stirrups n = - - = 3.59
448 1- 1-
The spacing between stirrups s = 0.8 x 480 = 106 mm --7 use 100 mm
3.59
150
I 139.2
2ls
T
Use Two 12 mm @ 100 mm
-1----1-- --9-- - 1 - - - - - -
Four pairs of closed 12 mm stirrups (i.e. four horizontal legs per pair of stirrups)
at 100 mm centers (Asb =1760mm 2 ) are provided. To satisfy horizontal
550 428.3
265 --t
11
I" .. I 295.8
bursting requirements, this size and spacing of stirrups should be provided from
the loaded face for a length of at least 480 mm.
1
11-12mm dim. stirrups at a-3S0~
at 100mm centres
12mm stirrups
40 I closed III open
~r----s~tirr-u-p~s-'~--~st~irr-u~ps--~
(fJ atl00m~es
Solution
Step 1: Check of bearing
~A2
350
= /122500 = 1.32 < 2.0 --7 ok
AI 70225
563 564
Ibeu =0.67 leu
1.5
E = 0.67 1.5
VA: 60 x1.32 =35.4 N Imm 2 < 34.17 .... .ok j j
~
Step 2: Design of transverse reinforcement (using beam method)
"¢
00
.,;
~
~
N
2000
11 =--=7547 kN Imm ;::l
265 0
.~
~--,
A = 1000 x 150 + 350x550 = 342500 mm 2 to
II
"
t-l
1 -
~
~
¢.:.
I
avg
I avg'
= Pj = 2000 = 0.005839 kN 1mm 2
A 342500
I flange =Iavg xB = 0.005839x1000 = 5.84kN Imm (Refer to Fig. EX. 7.4. lb.) I..S'S6'l -I
~ ~
Iweb =Iavg xb =0.005839x350=2.044kN Imm ~
:<t
~ "¢
to to
r-: r-:
The distributed region distance Le equals twice the distance of the prestressing
j ~
zone to the top edge. L. = 2 x 271. 7 = 543 mm
~ ~
.
Referring to Fig. EX 7.4.1d, the maximum moment occurs at point of zero shear
(x). Such a point is obtained as follows: 00
-I
~T'~
0\ f-- \0 ~
~ N N
2.044x = 7.547 (x -295.8) ~ x =405.7 mm
r-I
Taking moment about point (0) gives the maximum moment Mb : I 1
M b = (2.044X405.7 2 /2-7.547X(405.7 -295.8)212)/1000 = 122.6 kN.m i § 1
l'~ 1
~I
! ~ 1 1
§
.-.
T = Mb =122.6XI000=451.7kN o
§ <p
0-
to~ l(')--J-0
N to-j-N
I() Po.
;--,
·
«>"0 0
l~~
«> «> '"
b L./2 543/2 '-'
1
The allowable stress for h =280 N/mm2 is 160 N/mm2. The amount of vertical
·I ""-/ 1
transverse teinforcement in the web equals:
t-
I-~
N
·
J
«>
~-I
"¢
1
L--
A b = Tb = 451.7x1000 = 2823 mm 2 -I ~ I - - : g - l
s Is 160
565 566
This area of steel must be distributed within the length of the beam between 0.2 This area of steel must be distributed within the length of the beam between
(Le =109 mm) and (Le =453 rom) from the loaded surface. Use stirrups with (0.2 B=200 mm) and (B=1000 rom) from the loaded surface.
diameter of 16 mm over the full depth of the web and 12 mm stirrups
immediately behind the anchorage as shown in Fig. EX. 7.4.3. . d spacmg
The reqUire . =1000 - 200 = 139 mm ~
130mm
5.75
Asb,provided =2x201+2x113=628mm
Use <I> 16 mm @ 130 rom
. 2821
The number of stIrrups equals-- = 4.5 Step 3: Design of transverse reinforcement (using strut-and-tie)
628
Step 3.1: Distribution of forces
453-109 .
The required spacing =96 mm ~ use 90mm spaczng Another approach for solving the same previous problem is the strut-and-tie
4.5
approach. In this approach, the prestressing force is distributed to the flange and
Use <I> 12 mm +<1> 16 mm @90 mm to the web through a series of struts and ties as shown in Fig. EX. 7.4.2.
The area of the cross section equals
Step 2.1: Horizontal plane
A = 1000 x 150 + 350 x 550 = 342500 mm 2
Referring to Fig. EX. 7.4.1c, the stresses in the flanges equal:
The average stress equals
12 =Iavg xts =0.00584x150=0.876kN Imm
Due to symmetry, the point of zero shear is located at the middle. Thus the Fflange =1avg xAj/ange = 0.005839 x 1000 x 150 = 876kN
bursting moment in the horizontal direction equals;
The force in the flange is located at the c.g of the flange (75 mm from the top)
2
M b = ( 4.088;l75 +0.876x325x(175 +325/2) -7.547x (265;2)2 )11000 Fweb = P - 0/ange = 2000 - 876 =1126 kN
The force in the web is divided into two forces, each equals 563 kN.
Mb = 92.4kN .m Each force is located at quarter points of the web depth tweJ4 = 550/4=137.5
rom
The bursting moment is resisted by horizontal tension and compression in the The truss extends from the bearing plate into the beam for a length about the
flange. distance of the prestressing zone to the edge=271.7';::;272 mm
The forces at the bearing plate must equal those in the flange and the web but
T = M b = 92.4 x 1000 185kN with different spacing as shown in figure.
b BI2 500
I I = 2000 =7.547 kN Imm 876
The area of the horizontal reinforcement required in the flange equals: 265
S
563 S
A = Tb = 185 x 1000 =1156 mm 2 = Fflange = 876 = 116.1mm lt1
...,f
lt1
\0
sb Jlange Is 160 YI II 7.547 r-- N
lt1 563
...,f
= Fweb = 563 = 74.5 mm r--
Using top bars of 16 mm, the total number required is:
Y2 II 7.547
n = 1156 = 5.75 The distance between the force in the flange and the web=(Yl+Yz)/2=95.3 rom
201
567 568
Step 3.2: Vertical direction
The inclination of the bottom strut equals
T
+
197.2
867KN
A
-961
KN
+'~~ .
T
212.5
(J,
.1
= tan- I 333 -137.5 = 35.706"
272
~t
95'=-t- S63KN_ So.- -563 D 563KN The force in the strut equals= 563 = 693 kN
cos 35.706
"I'~rn
F. KN
~
~'693 405KN 275
The tension in the tie equals=693xsin35.7 = 405kN
The area of steel required to carry the force in the tie
333.0
KN ""'l.!.-- 876 KN
I
I
L I-- 272--l
137.5
--..L
A
sb
= Tb = 405 x 1000 = 2531 mm 2
Is 160
This area of steel must be distributed within the length of the beam between 0.2
Le =109 mm and Le =453 mm from the loaded surface. Use stirrups with
diameter of 16 mm over the full depth of the web and 12 mm stirrups
(a)Vertical dispersion of prestress (elevation)
immediately behind the anchorage as shown in Fig. EX. 7.4.3
Asb,provided =2x201+2xl13=628mm
. . 2531
-r
250
The number of sturups equals-- = 4.03
628
. d spacmg
The reqUIre . 453 -109 =.107 mm ~ use 9O '
mm spacmg
--od~-"-~l- ""'--r
4.03
±; l--
1- ----467
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _KN_______
j161KN ~~ 500
~
The horizontal spreading of the forces into the flange is shown in Fig EX. 7.4.2.
The total force is applied at the quarter point of the flange (250 mm for the
edge). The location of the horizontal force is at 272 mm from the edge. The
distance at which the truss is formed equals B/2=500 mm.
At the bearing plate the force is located at the quarter points =(265/4=66.25
. _438KN
K mm)
250 The inclination of the strut equals
569 570
The area of steel required to carry the force in the tie
A
sb
= Tb = 161x1000 = 1006mm2
Is 160
Ir 11
I-- 12mm @ 90 mm
9-16mm bars
atl30mm centr~e:Ls-+I--I--I--l--I-..J--I-I-l
- '--1- ._-1- .-----C--
1.-11
Photo 8.1 Prestressed box -girder bridge during construction
-.- 1-.- =----
8.1 Introduction
8x130=1040 Regular shear rft. The basic principles used in the flexural design and analysis o~ presn:essed
Plan concrete beams are presented in this chapter. Two steps are consldered m the
analysis and design of prestressed beams in flexure namely;
Fig. EX. 7.4.3 Reinforcement details for the anchorage zone • The analysis under service loads.
• The analysis at the ultimate state.-
571 572
wkNlm l
The fundamental relationships used in the service load analysis are based upon
the basic assumptions of elastic design. However, at the ultimate stage, stresses
and strains are not proportional and the ultimate limit analysis should be carried
out. Deflections under service loads together with the prestressing forces should e
be calculated to confirm the compliance with the applicable design criteria. P-~-t========================~r-pp~
B.2 Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Members
under Service Loads I· L
·1
8.2.1 General a- Loading
Flexural stresses in prestressed members are the result of the prestressing force B
P, the internal moment due to eccentric cable configuration, and the external
Ytop
applied moments (M). Calculations of stresses are based on the properties of the
Tts
1
gross concrete section. The resulting stresses at any point in the beam caused by '1j"-
P PXe _Mxy
i=--±--y+-- ............................... (8.1)
A I I I---l
b
where y is the distance from the C.G. of the section to a certain point; A is the
cross sectional area, I is the gross moment of inertia of the section, P is the b- Cross-section
prestressing force and M is the external applied moment. pxe M P PXe M
+-- J. = - - + - - -
The resulting stresses should be checked against the allowable values specified ZtoP top A Ztop Ztop
by the code and given in Tables 8.1 and 8.2. For calculation of stresses at the
extreme fibers, it is usually more convenient to express the quantity IIy as the
section modulus (Z). For non-symmetrical members such as T-sections, the bearnC.G.
section modulus at the top Ztop is different from the section modulus at the
bottom Zbot. For a simply supported beam, as the one shown in Fig. 8.1, the
stresses. at the top and bottom fibers of the beam can be calculated from:
P PXe M
ibot = - - - - - + - ............................................. (8.2)
A Zbot Zbot
_ pxe M P PXe M
+-- fbot = -----+--
P PXe M Zbot A Zbot Zbot
hop = - - + - - - - ............................................. (8.3) Zbol
A Ztop Ztop prestressing eccentricity external loads resultant
In which,
c- Stresses
I I
Zbot =-- ZIOP =--
Ybot YllJP
Fig. 8.1 Stress distributions in a concrete section due to
It should be clear that the stresses induced due to (P.e) are opposite to those The prestressing and the applied loads
induced due to the external applied moment M.
573 574
8.2.2 Allowable Concrete and Steel Stresses 8.2.2.2 Allowable Concrete Stresses
Concrete with high compressive strength is normally used in prestressed
8.2.2.1 Allowable Steel Stresses members. This is because of its high modulus of elasticity (less creep and
Prestressing steel is most commonly used in the form of wires or strands. The elastic shortening losses). In addition, its high bearing capacity permits the use
code specifies the ratio of the yield strength /py of the prestressing steel to its of small anchorage zone. The allowable stresses in concrete are dependent on
ultimate strength/pu as follows: the stage of loading. The ECP 203 gives these stresses in two stages namely; at
transfer and at service loads. The allowable stresses at transfer are given in
/P//pu = 0.80 for deformed bars. Table 8.2.
/P//pu =0.85 for normal relaxation stress-relieved strands, wires and bars. At the service load stage, the ECP-203 classifies prestressed concrete elements
/P//pu =0.90 for low relaxation stress-relieved strands and wires. into 4 cases depending on the tensile stresses developed in the section. These
cases are as follows: '
The strength reduction factor IPs for prestressing steel is taken the same as non- Case A: (Full prestressing)
prestressed steel. Hence, the strength reduction factor for flexure IPs is taken as
1.15. These are elements in which there is no tensile stresses are allowed
(developed tensile stress equals to zero). These elements are:
The tensile stresses allowed by the ECP 203 for prestressing wires, prestressing • Structural elements subjected to cyclic or dynamic loads.
'strands, or prestressing bars are dependent upon the stage of loading. At • Structures with tension side severely exposed to corrosive
environment of strong chemical attack which cause rusting of steel
jacking, the maximum allowable stress is the lesser of 0.75 /pu or 0.90/py .
(category four according to ECP 203).
When the jacking force is first applied, a stress of 0.70 /pu is allowed.
Case B: Uncracked sections
Immediately after transfer of the prestressed force to the concrete, the
permissible stress is 0.70/pu or 0.80/py whichever is smaller. The previous These are elements in which the tensile stresses due to all loads are less
than:
values are applied also in case of post-tensioned members. The ECP 203
allowable stresses in prestressing steel are summarized in Table 8.1 0.44 .JJ:: ............................................ (S.4a)
Examples of structural elements deigned according to case Bare:
Table 8.1 Allowable tensile stresses for prestressing steel
• Solid slabs and flat slabs.
Maximum stress produced by jacking (before transfer)"
0.90/py or 0.75/pu • Prestressed concrete elements with unbonded tendons.
• Structures with severely exposed tension side (category three
Maximum tendon stress at tensioning process 0.70/pu according to ECP 203).
Case C: An intermediate case between full and partial prestressing
Maximum tendon stress immediately after transfer not to 0.80/py or 0.70/pu
Structural elements are subjected to tensile stresses larger than case B
exceed the smaller of but less than the cracking strength of concrete given by:
Maximum stress in post-tensioned tendons at anchorages 0.80/py or 0.70/pu far = 0.6.JJ:: ~ 4.0 N Imm 2 ............................. (SAb)
and couplers immediately after anchorage of the tendons
Case D:Cracked sections (Partial prestressing)
not to exceed the smaller of
These are elements in which the tensile stresses due to all loads (using
• Not to exceed the stress recommended by the manufacturer of the prestressing system uncracked sections properties, I g ), are less than O.SS.JJ:: .
575 576
In addition, the tensile stresses developed in the section due to
permanent loads, which might include permanent live loads, should be
less than 0.6..JJ: . Table 8.2 Allowable concrete stresses (N/mm 2 )
At the time of initial tensioning before time dependent losses produced by
For cases C and D, ordinary reinforcing steel or non-prestressed
creep, shrinkage, or relaxation have occurred (At Transfer)
strands are provided to resist the tension force developed in the section
at the working stage. 1. Maximum compressive stress 0.45 !cUi
2. Maximum tensile stress except as permitted in
0.22/1::
item 3
Case A CaseB CaseC CaseD ·1
3. Maximum tensile stress at the ends of simply
O.44~fcUi
supported members
( -) ( -) (-) (-)
Service load flexural stresses, assuming all prestressed losses
have occurred (At Service Loads)
1. Maximum compressive stress due to prestressed
0.35 feu
plus sustained loads
Maximum Zero 0.44Ji: 0.60Ji: 0.85Ji: 2. Maximum compressive stress due to prestressed
tension 0.40!cu
plus total loads
3. Maximum tensile stress in pre-compressed zone Case A- zero
tensile zone CaseB- 0.44.JI:
577 578
8.2.3 Calculations of Stresses at Transfer 8.2.4 Calculations of Stresses at Full Service Loads
After applying the prestressing force to the beam, the beam deflects upward After the application of the superimposed dead loads and the live loads, the
(camber) and the only external applied moment is due to the self-weight of the prestressed member shall be subjected to the total service moment Mtotat. The
beam Mow as shown in Fig. 8.3. The bottom fibers are subjected to high full intensity of such loads usually occurs after the building is completed and
compression stresses while, the top fibers are subjected to tension stresses. The some time-dependent losses have taken place. Therefore, the prestressing force
concrete strength !cui used in the calculation of the permissible stresses should used in the computation of stresses is the effective prestressing force (Pe) as
be at the time of transfening the force to the concrete. Furthermore, the shown in Fig. 8.4. The total unfactored load on the beam is given as:
prestressing force (Pi) used in stress expressions is the initial prestressing force
before losses. W totaL = wow + W OL + Wu •.......•.•••........•...•.••.•.......••...... (8.7a)
~ ~ Xe Mow 0.45 Jcui Pe = Pi xli-losses (%)] ............................................ (8.7b)
F
Jbot = -----+--~ F
••••••••••••••••••••••••• (8.5)
A Zbot Zbot
The maximum bending at mid span for simple beam equals:
XL2
~ ~xe Mow 0 ~ =
Wtotat
F
Jt()P = --+-----~ .22 VfCUi ..•••.•.••.•....•.•.•• (8.6) M totat 8
A Ztop Ztop
~ --:::.::.::::::::umum-Tu_:-::::-~-~-?~ ,
-
~----------------
------- - ~
-- ------------
Pi
1
\ Initial camber
J
I. L
./
Loads at the service load stage
~--~------------~~
/rop< 0.22~ fCUi
~I~ Mtotal
/rop
fbot
v
Fig. 8.3 Stress distribution and allowable stresses at transfer Stresses at mid section
Fig. 8.4 Stress distribution and allowable stresses at full service loads
579 580
The stresses are calculated using Eq. 8.8 and Eq. 8.9. The stresses at mid-span
section should not exceed the limits allowed by the code and given in Table 8.2. 8.2.5 Summary
Equations for stress computation are used to determine the concrete stress at the
f lOp
- P. P. Xe M
- - - + - - - -loloJ- ............................................. (8.8) extreme fibers for positive and negative bending moments as summarized in
A ZIOP ZIOP Table 8.3. It is important to verify that the stresses for both load cases (at
transfer and at full service load) are within the allowably limits.
fboll om = - p. _ p. Xe + M loloJ ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• (8.9) Table 8.3 Stress calculations at top and bottom of sections subjected to
A Zbol Zbol either negative or positive bending moments
Item At transfer At full service load
!top P; p;xe Mow .[1;;;' _ Pe + Pe xe _ ~ DAD feu
".±,
;> --+-----~0.22 M 'Olal
[-Jr
A ZUJP .Z,op . em A Z,OP Z,OP
bO
:a"
"" !hot _ p. _ p. Xe + M lOU; ~seeTable8,2
.0
P; - -p;-X+
-- - - S0.45 f cui
e Mow ,',
"
;>
';:J
A
A ZOOI Zoot
.§ ZOOI Zbot . 4"
0.
"
~
~
;>
iii
.0
"
;>
.~
[J: !top
fbot
-Pi
---
A
. Pi
- -+
p; -Xe+ Mow
Ztop Ztop
P -Xe- - Mow
j
. f ei
- - S045
- - 5022
U
. .Jj::;
cui
_ Pe _ P. Xe
A
_Fe +
Z,op
P. xe
+ MlOlOl ~seeTable8,2
Z,OP
581
582
rr
1 1
obtained using the compressive strength of concrete at the time of pre-stressing
!cui as follows:
, !ci = 0.45 xfcui = 0.45 x 30 = -13.5 Nlmm2
L 1- 700 -1 L 1- 700 -1
I I\
T
200
200 I I
t f ---rt--rt- 150 - ~
o
o
\0
0
0
00
150- - 0
0
N
o
o
£
...... 00 ._.-. ' - 1-,-,-,-..,.--1--
lL I
1 lL
0
o
l£)
0
0
II \0
200
• I 200 1 • .
CI.l
I -- :!
II
"'
583 584
Step 2: Calculate the initial prestressing force at transfer
_EL
A
At transfer, the self-weight of the beam is the only applied load, thus:
2
M = wOW L2 = 1Ox22 = 605 kN.m
ow 8 8
The eccentricity of the cable from the C.G. of the section equals:
e = Y bot - cover = 600 -100 = 500 mm
The initial prestressing force should stratify the allowable stresses at transfer at _Pi xe +Mow f = - Pi _ Pi xe + Mow
A ZhO. . hoi A Zhol Zhol
the bottom and top fibers. Zoo.
prestressing eccentricity external resultant
/' P; P; Xe Mow load
Jbottom = - " A - Z + Z
bot bot The chosen initial prestressing force is the smaller of the two values, because it
Assuming that Pi is in kN, and applying in the previous equation gives PiI will give stress at the opposite fiber that is less than the allowable. In this case,
the critical load is 2852 kN giving -13.5 N/mm2 at the bottom fiber. Applying
-13.5 = P;l x 1000 x 500 605x10 6
P;l x 1000 ---'-'-----+----
8 8 this load at transfer will give stress at the top fiber of -7.6 N/mm2 (calculation
400000 1.289x10 1.289 x 10
is not shown), which is less than the allowable stress at transfer.
PiI= 2852 kN
Final design Pi =Pi1=2852 kN
A second value Pa is obtained from the analysis of the top fibers as follows:
Step 3: Calculate the required prestressing steel
The allowable prestressing stress at time of transfer is given by:
f top
=- Pi + Pi Xe _ Mow
A Z Z 0.70 f pu = 0.7 x 2000 = 1400N Imm 2
top top
f pi = smaller of { 2
+1.2= P;2xlOOO + P;2x1000x500 605x10 6 . 0.8fpy =0.8x1700=1360N Imm
400000 1.289xl08 1.289x10 8 [Pi= 1360 N/mm2
P i 2= 4281 kN
A =!L= 2852x1000 =2097 mm 2
ps f.pI 1360
_._._._._._-_.__ __._---_._------
~
. ~ Step 4: Calculate the stresses at the serviCe load stage
~
.---"
---- --- ------ - - ----.
----- ~
The total load is the summation of dead and live loads.
585 586
r
The total moment at the mid-span equals:
= - Pe + Pe Xe _ M total
I bottom A Z Z
top top
,......-----..-. ........-..................................._............-----,
.-
587
I:' 588
Example 8.2 Solution
Figure EX 8.2 shows the cross-section of a simply supported post-tensioned Step 1: Calculate Section Properties
beam. Determine the maximum span of the beam based on the stresses at the
transfer. Assume that the beam is made of normal strength concrete withfcu=40 The cross sectional area (A) equals:
N/mm2, and the concrete strength at transfer (!cui) is 75% of the cube strength. A = 350 x 1300 = 455000 mm 2
Assume also that the time dependent losses are 12% of the initial prestressing
and that the yield strength and the ultimate strength of the tendons are 1700 and Since the section is symmetrical; Ytop = Ybottom= 650 mm
2000 N/mm2, receptively. 3
1= 350x1300 = 6.41xlO lO mm 4
Knowing that the beam is categorized as case D, check stresses at full service 12
stage if the beam is SUbjected to an unfactored live load of 12.5 kN/m' and
lO
unfactored superimposed dead load of 4 kN/m'. Calculate the required non Zbol := _1_ = 6.41xlO = 98.583x10 6 ",nm 3
prestressed steel (fY=4~0 N/mm 2 ). YbOllom 650
The allowable compression stress!ci and the allowable tension stress fti can be
obtained using the compressive strength of concrete at the time of pre-stressing
!cUi as follows:
2
feui = 0.75 x feu =0.75x30=22.5 Nlmm
2
!ci = 0.45 X!cui = 0.45 x 22.5 = -10.125 Nlmm
350mm
fli = 0.22~ feui = 0.22.j22.5 = 1.04 N I mm
2
-,...-
0
tr)
\0
II
B'
;>-
0
~
0
,. I ....
~
I- 0
tr)
\0
110
>:
Fig. EX 8.2 Beam elevation and cross section
590
Step 2: Calculate the prestressing force Analysis of the stresses at the top fiber, which is tension, gives:
~
~~------------------ ~ ~~5 ~~~~'
- f!11.8~
2448 -- -------------.:::: 2448
fhottom=-IO.125
I· L
·1
591 592
1
l
Step 4: Calculate stresses at the service load stage Step 5: Calculation of non-prestressed steel (As)
Since the stresses at the bottom (+5.09 N/mm2) exceeds the tensile strength of
The total load is the summation of dead and live loads. concrete (0.6.J40 =3.79N Imm 2 ), the beam must be reinforced with non-
prestressed steel. The depth of the tension zone Yten equals:
WIOIa! =wow +W DL +w LL =11.375+4+12.5 = 27.875kN 1m'
5.09 6
Y ten = x 1300 = 33 .8 rom
The total moment at the midspan equals: 5.09+14.56
2
fee =0.40feu =0.40x40=-16N Imm
-----------
flOP =
2154.24xlOOO
----------+----------~--
455000
2154.24xlOOox550
98.583x106
2153.2x106
98.583x106
\_.0--_____ 24.858 m --------1/
Loads at the service load stage
ftop =-14.56N Imm 2 ••• <-16 (safe)
ftop=-I4.56
f bOl/om
=- Pe _ P. Xe + Mlata!
A Z Z
bot bot
6
f = _ 2154.24xlOOO 2154.24 x 1000 x 550 + 2153.2x10
bOl/om 455000 98.583x106 98.583x106
fbottom=+5.09
The beam is considered safe because both extreme fiber stresses (at top and
bottom) are less than the allowable stress.
Stresses at mid section
594
593
11
Example 8.3 Solution
Calculate the required prestressing forte at the service load stage if the
Step 1: Calculate Section Properties
beam shown in the figure is subjected to dead loads of 8 kN/m'(not
including own weight) and live loads of 20 kN/m'. The beam is prestressed The cross sectional area (A) equals:
with unbonded tendons and the losses may be assumed 16 %. It is also
A= 1200x150+250x750 =367500 mm 2
required to check the stresses at transfer.
Assume that/cu=45 N/mm2,/cui= 34 N/mm2 Since the section is not symmetrical, calculate the location of the center of
gravity. ~ = 1200x150x75 + 250x750x525 =304.6 mm
Y 367500
3 3
1= 1200x150 +1200xlS0x(304.6-7SY + 250x750 + 250x750x(525-304.6Y
12 12
I =2.77 x 10 10 mm4
L=ISm
I- -\ Ytop= Y = 304.6 mm
1 I"
1200mm
--I Ybot 595.4
t 1200mm
0
~ 100 11- •I
--
tr)
t""-
l Aps
150
I I Ytop=304.6
• n -
t I ..2S0-I 0
tr)
t""-
l00~ Aps
-£~.:- Ybot=59S.4
Beam cross-section
•
i.- '--
t
tzsoJ
595 596
Since the beam is prestressed with unbonded tendons, the beam is categorized The second value for the prestressing force is obtained from the critical
as case B. The allowable compression stressfce and the allowable tension stress condition at the top fibers, which is given by:
fte at full service load (case B) can be obtained using the compressive strength
of concrete!cu as follows:
f. == - Pe + P. Xe _ Mtotal
top A Z Z
Ice =0.40 x!cu =0.40 x 45 =-18.0 N/mm2 top top
1--......-------15 m-------l.!
1738x1000 1738x1000x495.4 258.4x106
Stresses at mid section fbottom = ------'---
6
+-----:-
6
367500 46.6x10 46.6x10
at serviceload
2
fbottom fbotlom ==1-17.671 N/mm >1-15.31 N/mm2 (unsafe)
597 598
P. P. Xe Mow Example 8.4
f =--' +-'- - - -
top A Ztop Ztop
The cantilever beam shown in figure supports a balcony in a stadium. It is
6 required to determine the cross sectional area for low relaxation stress relieved
1738x1000 1738xl000x495.4 258.4 X 10 strands based on the allowable stresses at transfer. Assume that /pu= 1900
-------+------~--- 2
367500 91.02 X 106 91.02xl06 N/mm ,!cu=50 N/mm2, !cui= 38 N/mm2. -
Calculate the service load stress if the unfactored superimposed dead load is 8.0
2
f lop =+1.89 N/mm > +1.283 N/mm2 (unsafe) k N/m' and the unfactored live load is 14 kN/m'.Assume losses of 15% and that
the beam is considered as case B.
The beam is considered unsafe because both the extreme fiber stresses exceed
the allowable stresses.
100
L 1- 900 -1--1-1---,-
I • IT
1738 ,j------- ------ ---.:::
~ -----------~1738
---,.---;-15_0
0
o
f f
200- t-
0
\0 0
0\
I· 15
LL
-----....;..----,-_._.................._...........
·1
150
T
I I
1- -1400
1
Beam cross section
Prestressed steel
.....•..........•.............••..••....._ .._ ...................................... L-_ _~
/
[-- ---- -- -- ---=--- -- -I
hOllom==--17 .67
Stresses at transfer
I~ 6m -I
Beam elevation
59.9 600
The .allowable compression stress!ci and the allowable tension stress !Ii can be
Solution obtamed using the compressive strength of concrete at the time of pre-stressing
Step 1: Calculate section properties !cui as follows:
A = 900x150+600x200+400x150 = 315000 mm
2 !ci = 0.45 X !cui =0.45 x 38 =-17.1 N/mm2
fa = 0.22~fcui = 0.22.,[38 =1.365 N / mm
2
Sirce the section is not symmetrical, one should calculate the CO.
= ~oox 150x 75 + 600 x 200x450 + 400x150x 825 = 360.7 mm
Step 2: Calculate the initial prestressing force at transfer
y 315000
3 3
At transfer, the self-weight is the. only load that acts on the beam at transfer.
I = 900x150 +900XI50X(360.7 _75)2 + 200 x 600 + 200x600x(450-360.7)2
12 12 2
3 M = wOW L2 = 7.875x6 =141'75kN'
+ 400 X150 +400XI50x(825-360.7)2 = 2.887 X lOiO mm
4 ow 2 2 ..m
12
The eccentricity of the cable from the C.G, of the section equals:
Ytop= )I =360.7 mm
e = Y top -cover = 360.7 -100 = 260.7 mm
y bot =t~ - Y = (150 + 600 + 150) - 360.7 = 539.3 mm
The first prestressing force is obtained from the critical condition at the bottom
I 2.887 X 1010 6 fibers, which is tension as shown in figure and is given by:
Z top = -- = 80.053 X 10 mm 3
Ytop 360.7
J; - P; p;xe Mow
1o bottom - -A" + --z--- Z
Zbot =_1_ = 2.887x1e = 53.546x106 mm 3 bot bot
Yo~t 539.3 Assuming that Pi is in leN, and applying in the previous equation, one gets:
= xA= 25 ", 315000 7.875kNlm' +1.365 = p;) x 1000 +[;) x 1000 x 260.7 141.75 X 10
6
wo,w Yc 1,000000
315000 53.546 X 106 53.546 X 106
100 Pi1=2367.7 leN
L !- -I_...l...-,-_
900
_Pi xe Mow
___ : __ Jt
150 _!!.L +--
o
o
1.0
150
- Pi p'xe
T !- -l
400
_!!.L
A
prestressin
+Pi Xe
Z,op
eccentricit
_Mow
Z,~p
external
load
- - -Mow
f bo, - -A- +Zrop
resultant
--
Z,op
601 602
The second prestressing force is obtained from the critical condition at the top Step 3: Calculate the required prestressing steel
fibers, which is compression as show~ in figure and is given by:
For low relaxation stress relieved strands, the code specify the yield stress as:
f = - P; _ p.. Xe + Mow fpy = 0.9xfpu = 0.9x1900 = 1710 N/mml
lop A ZIOP ZIOP
The allowable prestressing stress at time of transfer is given by:
6
-17.1 = P;l X 1000 _ P;l X 1000 X 260.7 + 141.75x10 0.70 fpu = 0.7 X 1900 = 1330 N Imm 2
6 6
315000 80.053x10 80.053 X 10 fP = smaller of {
0.8 fpy = 0.8x1710 = l368 N I mm 2
bi=l330 N/mm2
The allowable stresses at the bottom and top fibers of the section are -17.1
N/mm2 and + 1.356 N/mm2, respectively. The calculation of the prestressing A =.!J.... = 2367.7 X 1000 = 1780 mm 2
ps f. l330 .
force should be based on the smaller of the two values obtained from the pI
analyses of stresses at the bottom and top fibers (Pil=2367.7 kN.m). This is
Step 4: Calcl,llate stresses at the service load stage
attributed to the fact that at the case of transfer the self-weight moment
produces stresses that are of opposite sign compared to the allowable stresses. The total load is the summation of dead and live loads:
Final design Pi=Pi1=2367. 7 kN w lotal =wow +WDL +W LL =7.875+8+14= 29.875kN 1m'
The total moment at the support equals:
A summary of the calculations is given in the following table.
2 2
M =w101 L = 29.875x6 =537.8 kN.m
Item bottom condition Top condition 101 2 2
Allowable stress N/mm£ +1.36 -17.1 The effective prestressing force at the time of applying all service loads is:
. f
(",_=+1.36·
ftop=-13.46
unsafe
("'_=-2.~
ftop=-17.1
f7
. flOP =
2012.5 x1000
315000
2012.5 x 1000 X 260.7 537.8x106
80.053 X 106 + 80.053 X 106
flOP = 1-6.231N I mm 2 •• , < 1-201 (sofe)
603 604
P. P. Xe M total Example 8.5
fbol/om =~A+-Z---Z-
bot bot
Assuming that the cantilever beam shown in Example 8.4 may be categorized
2012.5 x 1000 + 2012.5 xlOOOx260.7 537.8x10
6 as case D and based on the service load stage, calculate the maximum value of
the live load that can be added to the beam.
315000 53.546x106 53.546 X 106
fbol/om = -6.63 N I mm 2 ••• < -20(safe) Data:
/pu =19 N/mro 2
2
The beam is considered safe because non of the extreme fiber stresses exceed feu =50 N/mro
feu j= 38 N/mm 2
the allowable stresses.
Losses 15%
L=6.0m .. 100
1- ---1
900
l
---l_~_
150
I • I,
f f
T
8 200- I-
\ \0
o
o
0\
I
I
I
I
150
T
II
1- 400 -1
1
I
Beam cross section
I
I
I
605 606
Solution !, =_ p. _ p. Xe + Mlotat
top A -ZIOP ZIOP
Mlolat
2
fee =0.40fcu =0.40x50=-20N Imm 2 ,
WIOI = 69.6 kN 1m
The first critical moment is obtained from the critical stress at the bottom fibers.
WIOI =69.6= 29.875+wadd
wtot=29.875+waddl Thus the load that can be added to the beam equals:
A tlllllll~
------
1~20
Wadd= 39.8 kNlm/
. - - . - - - - - - Pr 2012.5
Item bottom condition Top condition
1------6 m----t Actual stress N/mmz -20.00 6.01
w tot (KN/m') 69.64 84.3
=- p. + Pe Xe _ M lotal
f bOllom A Z Z Wadd (KN/m') 39.76 54.4
bot bot
Stress at opposite fiber* 2.72 -26.45
6
-20= 2012.5 X 1000 + 2012.5 X 1000 X 260.7 Mtolall x10 N/mm2
315000 53.546x106 53.546x106
Condition safe unsafe
Mtotal,1=1253.5 kN.m
fro p=6.01
-~
frop=+2.72
~he second ~ritical moment is obtained from the critical stress at the top fibers.
1..=6.01
A
f------~ wtop29.875+Wadd2
I IIIII
'h W
fbottom=-26.45-
O
- , _ - -- - - - Pe=2012.5 - fboltom=-20
608
607
Load
8.3 Flexural Strength of Prestressed Beams
The main objective of the prestressing procedure is to produce a member that is Ultimate
almost free of cracks at service loads. However, the satisfaction of concrete and las tic range: load
steel stress limits at service loads does not necessarily ensure adequate strength changes are resisted
Yielding --- --- ----- -- - --------- ---- by stress changes
and does not provide a reliable indication of either the actual strength or the
safety of a structural member. It is important to consider the non-linear behavior J
Transition range: load
of the member in the ultimate stage to ensure that it has an adequate structural changes are resisted by
capacity. stress changes+ shift of
the pressure line
If external dead and live loads are applied to the prestressed concrete member
shown in Fig. 8.5, various loading stages are noted. A typical loading history
along with stress distribution is given in Fig. 8.5 and Fig 8.6. The following is a
summary of loading stages:
!c,r
1. The initial prestressing force Pi is applied to the beam and is
-Iecompre~sion
2.
transmitted to the concrete together with the beam self-weight.
This is usually called the transfer stage.
At the serVice load stage, the full superimposed dead load is
applied. In most cases, this will produce compression stresses all
Bru.ored 1_ _ --
f=1~
Elastic range: load
changes are resisted by
shift of the pressure line
over the cross section as shown in Fig. 8.6. Most of the long-term
losses including creep and shrinkage have occurred leading to net
prestressing force of Pe •
-----------f full d=llood
610
609
wkNlm'
T
8.3.2 Calculations of the Ultimate Moment Capacity
The ECP 203 requires that the moment due to all factored loads not to exceed
P- the ultimate capacity of the section. The ultimate moment capacity Mu is
calculated in a manner similar to that adopted for ordinary non-prestressed
I
beams. If a prestressed beam is loaded up to failure, the distribution of the
I· L
·1 I stresses becomes nonlinear and the strain in the steel'continues to increase with
noticeable large deformations.
tension compression compression compression The code assumes that the final failure occurs when the concrete strain reaches
-II- I
-II- I-J H f 0.003. Since the stress-strain curve of the prestressing steel does not contain a
I well defined yield plateau, the stress in the tendons continues to increase
beyond the yield point at a reduced slope. The final steel stress at ultimate iPs
1 must be predicted in order to compute the ultimate capacity of the beam.
Referring to Fig. 8.7, eqUilibrium of the internal forces gives
At transfer Full dead loads At full Ultimate 0.67 feu b a + A; xly = Aps X fps + As X fy ...................... (8.11)
service load 1.5 1.15 1.15 1.15
in which
Fig. 8.6 Stress distributions at various stages
Ce is the compression force in the concrete.
Cs is the compression force in the non-prestressing steel
Tp is the tension force in the prestressing cables
During the loading of a prestressed concrete beam, the neutral axis starts to rise
T is the tension force in the non-prestressing steel
at a relatively uniform rate as the external loads increase. This behavior
continues until the beam cracks. After the cracking load has been exceeded the
n~u~~ axi~ rate of ~ovement decreases as additional loads are applied, a~d a 0.67 feu 11.5
slg?lflcant m~reas~ m the s.tress in the prestressing tendon begins to take place. 0.003 r----:-:I
This change m actlOn contmues until the applied loads are entirely resisted by
I--~c----Cs
proportional changes in the internal forces, just as the ordinary reinforced
,-,---Ce
~oncrete .. At the ulti~ate stage, additional moment capacity is created by an
mc~ease m ~he magmtude of the components of the internal couple rather than
by mcrease m the arm of the internal couple as shown in Fig. 8.5. .
The fact that the load is carried at the ultimate by different actions that are
significantly different than those in the elastic range makes the ultimate strength
(
._-------- .-- ..
ca~culations essential for all prestressed members to ensure that adequate safety
__ _---- .-.
..__._.. ..
T=As//1.15
eXists.
I· b
611 612
8.3.3 Calculation of Prestressing Steel Stress at
The depth of the compression stress block (a) is determined from Eq. 8.11. For Ultimate fps
rectangular sections with prestressing steel in the tension side only, the ultimate The calculation of/ps depends on whether the tendons are bonded or unbonded.
moment is given by:
8.3.3.1 Calculation of fps in Bonded Tendons
The ECP 203 provides two different methods for calculating the steel stress at
Mu . Ap~.::ps (d p-~) ............................. (8.12) ultimate for bonded tendons. These two methods &re:
• The strain compatibility method.
• The simplified method.
where dp is the distance from the prestressed reinforcement to the compression
fiber. A: Calculation of fps Using the Strain Compatibility
For sections reinforced ·with both non-prestressing steel (tension and At transfer, tendon stress is equal to the initial prestressing stress /Pi and the
compression) and prestressing steel as the one shown in Fig. 8.7, the ultimate external moment equals the self weight moment. As creep and shrinkage occur,
moment Mu is given by: . the concrete shortens and the stress in the tendon drops to a value less than/pi as
shown in Fig. 8.8b. When service loads are applied, the beam deflects
xiy(d
M= Aps1.15ips (d _E..)2 + As1.15
X
y
_~)+ A; xi (~-dl) .... (8.13)
downward and the cable elongate. Since the developed bending strains are
small compared to the strains in the prestressing steel, only a slight increase in
u p 2 1.15 2
the tendon force occurs. The increased internal moment (from Mow to Ms )
required to resist the moment produced by the live loads, is created by an
Total amount of prestressing steel and non-prestressing steel reinforcement increase in the arm of the internal couple (the neutral axis moves upwards)
shall be adequate to develop at least 1.2 the cracking moment Mer given by the without any significant increase in tendon stress. When the tensile stress in the
ECP 203 (explained in details in Chapter 9). Exception is made for ~exural concrete equals the tensile strength (occurs at Mer), cracking occurs and the
members with shear and flexuraL strength that exceed twice the ultimate design tendon stress increases by the amount equal to the tension formerly carried by
moment and for unbonded post-tensioned slabs. the concrete. If the load is further increased, the strain in the prestressing steel
increases at an accelerated rate and the beam undergoes large deflections and
In all of the above equations, prestressing steel stress at ultimate /ps is unknown reaches /ps at the ultimate condition (Mu). For under-reinforced beams, the final
because the stress-strain curve is non-linear as shown in Fig. 8.8a; failure occurs when the maximum compressive strain in the concrete reaches a
value of 0.003.
Increase in tendon stress
Losses due creep,
after cracking /ps
shrinkage, rela,::Ition \
/Pi .-----.J /pe
1
1
1
til •
1
til 1
(\) 1
!3
CI)
1
1
1
s:: 1
0 1
"t::I 1
s:: 1
~
1
·1
Strain, Eps
• .. Moment
Mow Ms Mer Mu
Fig. 8.8a Stress-Strain curve for prestressing reinforcement Fig. 8.8b Tendon stress as a function of the applied. load
613 614
T
I
The ECP 203 states that the strain in the prestressing steel at ultimate Cps can be Calculation of ~e
computed as the sum of three components as follows (refer to Fig. 8.9).
At transfer, the bottom fibers are subjected to compressive stresses due to the
Cps == c pe +cce +c pe •••••••••.••••••••.••••••••••••• (8.14) existence of the prestressing steel. After applying the service load, the stresses
at the bottom fibers decrease gradually until reaching zero. The strain required
Where for the concrete stress to reach zero at the level of prestressing steel is called the
Eps= the strain in the prestressing steel due to prestressing after computing all decompression strain Cce as shown in Fig. 8.10. From compatibility of the
losses. strains, the strain in the concrete must be equal that of the prestressing steel.
!,
l
Ece = the strain in concrete at the level of the prestressing steel due to 1
C;. ==
Epc
prestressing after computing all losses (decompression strain).
= the strain in the prestressing steel determined using equilibrium of forces.
iI where
fee ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Ee
(8.16)
Ec is the concrete modulus of elasticity at full strength and fce is the stress in the
Calculation of ~
concrete due to prestressing force after considering all losses and is given by
Eq.8.17.
The first compone~t Epe is the strain due to prestressing, and can be computed
simply by applying Hook's law as follows:
fee == P" + p" XeXe ......................................... (8.17)
A I . .
C
. p.
=E =p. E
fpc lAps ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• (8.15)
p p
where Ep is the steel modulus of elasticity, Pe is the effective prestressing tension compression
forceand Aps is the cross sectional area of the prestressing steel.
......--1.-................._ ...._ .............
"0 ..j"
( 5
••
Aps
A.
T==As//1.15 prestressing.force only decompression stage
b strain due to '. Fig. 8.10 Stresses in concrete due to prestressing and at decompression stage
decompression
Fig. 8.9 Strain and stress distributions at ultimate for a prestressed beam
615 616
,Calculation of lh
After the decompression stage the behavior of the prestressed beam becomes B: Calculation of fps Using Empirical Equations
similar to that of an ordinary reinforced concrete beam as shown in Fig. 8.9. The previous procedure for calculating the prestressing steel stress at failure is
From the decompression stage to the ultimate stage, additional strain .!:pc starts to reasonably accurate but it is time consuming. The ECP 203 states that the stress
develop in the prestressed steel reinforcement. Since the maximum concrete in the bonded prestressing steel at failure can be predicted by the following
strain at failure stated in the ECP 203 is 0.003, the corresponding strain in the empirical formula only ifhe>0.5 hu as follows:
steel above the decompression stage can be calculated from:
,
c pc = 0.003x-P-
d -c
c
............................... (8.18) Ips = Ipu [l-17 (J.1p ~+~(
p
0.8/<u d p
OJ-OJ,))l······················ (8.21)
where dp i& the depth of the prestressing steel, c is the depth of the neutral axis
obtained froD! the equilibrium of all forces acting on the section including non- where
prestressed steel using Eq. 8.11.
The material strength reduction factor for the prestressing steel (Yps) is taken as OJ' - J.1' ( Iy )
1.15. The corresponding stress at ultimat~ Ips can be obtained from the idealized 0.801cu
stress-strain curve suggested by the code as given by Eq. 8.20 and Fig. 8.11.
As
J.1=--
bxd
I·,;
','
,
2. d' ~0.15 dp ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
When the term [(J.1 p Ipu /0.8/cu )+d /d p (OJ-OJ')J in Eq. 8.21 is small, the
(8.23)
.!:pu Strain
compression reinforcement does not develop its yield strength and Eq. 8.21
Fig. 8.11 Idealized stress~strain curve for prestressing steel becomes un-conservative. This 1S the reason why the term
617
618
[(,up fpu 10.8feu )+d Id p (to-a/)] in Eq. 8.21 may not be taken less than In order to ensure a good serviceability behavior for members with unbonded
tendons, a reasonable amount of non-prestressing steel has to be used. This steel
0.17, if the compression reinforcement is taken into account when computing COI1trols the flexural cracks and contributes to the ultimate moment capacity.
hs.
The minimum area of non-prestressing steel As for a prestressed beam with un-
If the conditions given by Eq. 8.22 and Eq. 8.23 are not met, the compression bonded steel equals.
reinforcement contribution is assumed to be zero (ro'=O) and in this case the
term [(,upfpuI0.8feu)+dldp(tO-tO')] may be less than 0.17 and an As = 0.004 A ............................................ (8.25)
increased value ofhs is obtained. However, the contribution of the compression
steel in calculations ofthe ultimate moment (Eq. 8.13) should be considered. where A is the area of the part of the section between the tension face and the
e.G. of the beam as shown in the figure below.
8.3.3.2 Calculation of IPs for Unbonded Tendons
The grouting of the prestressing ducts is always a recommended practice.
C.G
However, in some situations such as in two-way slab systems or in voided
slabs, it is difficult to perform grouting operation in the ducts because the
thickness of the concrete section is small.
Members with unbonded strands lack the bond between the concrete and the
prestressing steel and accordingly strain compatibility method cannot be used.
Therefore, it is clear that the expressions presented for stress in prestressed
bonded steel is not applicable for unbonded steel. However, Eq. 8.12 and Eq
8.13 for the calculation of the ultimate moment Mu are still valid since they are
derived from the satisfaction ofthe equilibrium conditions.
The ECP 203 presents the following set of expressions to estimate hs in
unbonded prestressing steel.
• For members with unbonded tendons having a span-to-depth ratio of 35
or less (applies to most beams):
·f -f
ps - pe
+70+( 125feu,up ) (N/mm 2 ) •••••••••••••••••••••••••• (8.24a)
but not greater thanhy and not greater than ((pe+420 N/mm2)
• FOr members with unbonded tendons having a span-to-depth ratio
greater than 35 or less (applies to most slabs):
619 620
Subsisting with code limit on CVr of 0.28 gives:
8.3.4 Maximum Limits for the Areas of Prestressing
and non-prestressing Reinforcing Steel ~ S 0.55 ....................................... (8.32)
dp .
The amount of steel in prestressed members should be limited to ensure ductile
failure (similar to c/d limitation for ordinary concrete memt>ers). The limitation
For T- sections (refer to Fig. 8.12), if the neutral axis lies inside the flange, the
rarely presents a problem for me!Uber;; with reasonable am::mnt of prestressing
flange width (B) is used instead of the web width b as follows:
steel. The reinforcement index for prestressing and non-prestressing steel shah
be limited to:
()) - Aps X fps ())- As ( fy ) ()), - A: ( fy )
p - B xd p 0.80feu' - B xd 0.80feu' - B xd 0.80feu
m, = ( OJ, + :, (OJ- OJ'))" 0.28 ..........................•..... (2.26)
However, if the neutral axis lies in the web, the reinforcement is given by:
Equations 8.26 can be presented in form of cldp, where c is the neutral axis in which the ordinary reinforcement indices (ffiw,ffiw') should be based on the
depth obtained using the equilibrium of forces and dp is the depth of the web width (b) as follows: .
prestressing steel. For example, for rectangular sections the substitution with
the values of CUp, (0 and (0' in Eq. 8.26 gives:
ill
I
=_1 (~xfps +~(~(fL)
0.80 b xd p feu
d b xd feu
~(fL)11
t xd feu ))
p
__ .. (8.27)
---j
1-1._ _ _B_~_---l·1 a 0.67 x feu L I· 900
1.5
Cs=A~!11.15 Mu
1T
0
0
\0
150
200 - - - -
1 ~
0
0
LL
0\
------------------------l-4t-f..-!:.:~~--=::.--I----
100
T=As/y .15
150
• 1
Fig. 8.12 Forces in T- prestressed beam I T t-- --I 400
623 624
Solution
L200-
\0
o
00
Step 2: Calculate the ultimate moment
Aps =1780
Since the section does not contain any non-prestressed reinforcement, the
effective stress [ps equals:
' - -_ _ _...J ---------------------"---~--
I (1710)
For......!!L- - - ~0.90~~1Jp =0.350
I pu 1900 .
2
Ips = 1900 [1-0.35 (0.00247 1900 )] = 1821.91 N Imm
0.80x50
Applying equilibrium equation, and assuming that the neutral axis within the
flange
0.67 xicu xB xa _ Aps xj ps 0.67x50x900xa 1780x1821.91
=-----
1.5 1.15 1.5 1.15
a =140.3 mm as assumed <150 mm
625
626
Example 8.7: Mu using the approximate equation (T -section) Solution
Compute the ultimate moment capacity for the T -beam shown in the figure Step 1: Check the applicability of the approximate equation
below. The beam is pre-tensioned with bonded normal stress relieved tendons.
Data To apply the approximate method, fpe > fpu must be satisfied.
2 2
Aps=1500mm
1800 . .
feu = 40 N/mm2 --7 980> -2- , the approxImate equatIOn can be used to calculate hs.
2
fpu =1800 N/mm
Step 2: Compute fps
fpe = 980 N/mm2
Check that the area of the prestressing steel is less than the maximum allowed Since no ordinary steel is provided, (0=00'=0
by the code.
For normal stress relieved strands, the ratio h!hu = 0.85, thus:
I'"
1000mm
... , f
- For 2L :2: 0.85 --7--7'1] = 0.50
I I fpu p
§
0
T
80
Assuming that the neutral axis is within the flange, the prestressed
reinforcement ratio shall be based on the flange width of 1000 mm.
0
'0
"- Aps 1500
f..l = - - = =0.0025
Aps p B xd p 1000 x 600
- - -e.
,
"-
80
---------------·---------f-...--f-------....L._---1_ _
627 628
Step 3: Check the neutral axis position Step 5: Compute ultimate moment capacity Mu
ApplicatiQn of the equilibrium equation gives:
Applying the equilibrium equation, the compressed area Ac equals:
0.67 x leu X Ac Asp X Ips 0.67x40xA c 1500x1293.75
0.67 X feu xAe _ Asp xfps 0.67x40xAe _ 1500x1694.5 1.5 1.15 1.5 1.15
1.5 1.15 1.5 1.15 Ac = 94450mm 2
Ae =122169 mm 2 The area ofthe hatched flange Al equals:
Since the compressed area Ae is greater than the flange area, the neutral axis is. AI = (1000 - 250) x 80 = 60000 mm 2
located outside the flange (a>ts). Hence, our assumption is not correct and hs I
should be recalculated. I a = 94450 - 60000 = 34450 = 137.8 mm .
250 250 >ts
I
Step 4: Recalculate 'Ips I
j Summing the moments about the prestressing steel:
I
Since the neutral axis is outside the flange, the reinforcement index should be
based on the web thickness of 250 mm. M=Cf(d -~)+.
u 2 C (d -~)
p2 w p
ApI x1293.75 3
--'-'.---- = 1072 x 10 -+ A pi = 952.89 mm 2
1.15
629 630
2
Apw =Aps -A pf =1500-952.89=547.11 mm
Example 8.8: Mu using the approximate equation
OJpw
=~x ips = 547.11 x 1293.75 =0.147 Determine the ultimate moment capacity for the bonded low-relaxation stress
b xd p 0.80icu 250x600 0.80x40 relieved strands for the rectangular cross-section shown in the figure below.
The material properties are
Note that the applications of the above two procedures lead to the conclusion 50 250
that the girder contains reinforcement of 52% of the maximum area of steel.
, !. -\
•
•
The first procedure ---?---?
A ps=580mm2
5;~·-·- .... ·-
50 " ..
.....
._.- - As =1220mm2
Beam cross-section
631 632
Solution For low relaxation strands h//Pu=0.9,the coefficient 1] p = 0.35.
A 1220
f.1 = b:d = 250x700 = 0.007
.15
Aps=580mm2
'=~= 640 =0.0037 L-_--IAs =1220 mm2
f.1 bxd 250x700 ./ T=Asf11.15
Aps 580 0.0036 Strain and stress distributions for th~ beam
f.1 p = bxd p = 250x650
Compute the reinforcement indices 00 and 00' 0.67 feu b a A; fy As fy . Aps fps .
-----"-=--- + - - =- - + -..::.::~=-
f 400 1.5 1.15 1.15 1.15
0; = f.1x-y- = 0.007 x = 0.077
feu 0.8x45
640 x 400
fy
0;'= f.1'X- - = 0.0037 x
400
=0.041 0.67x45x250a
------ + = 1220x400 +580x1747
----
feu 0.8x45 1.5 1.15 1.15 1.15
a=215.5 mm and c=269.36 mm
Step 3: Determine prestressing steel stress at ultimate f ps
Check yielding of the compression reinforcement
To account the compression steel in hs calculations, two conditions must be
, c -d' 269.36-50 400.
satisfied: fs = 600 - - = 600 = 488 N I mm 2 > - CompresslOn steel yields
c 269.36 1.15
1. M
u
= Aps fps (d
1.15 p
_!!:.)+
2
As fy (d _!!:.)+ A; fy (!!:.-d')
1.15 2 1.15 2
R =(0.0036X1900 + 700(0.077-0.041))=0.228>0.17"'0.k M = 580 x 1747 (650- 215.5)+ 1220x400 (700- 215.5)+ 640 x 400(215.5 -50)
p 0.8x45 650
"1.15 2 1.15 2 1.15 2
2. 50 < 0.15x650 = 9.75···.o.k Mu= 741.96 kN.m
633 634
Step 5: Check the maximum reinforcement ratio Example 8.9: Mu using the strain compatibility method
According to the ECP 203 the maximum reinforcement index rot should be less Use strain compatibility method to calculateJ;,s for the beam given in example
than 0.28.
8.8. The ultimate strain for the prestressing steel is equal to 0.04.
OJ. = (0.0036X1747 + 700 (0.077 -0.041)) = 0.213 < 0.28 ...o.k /pu=1900 N/mm2
t 0.8x45 650 2
/y =400 N/mm
-c =-
269.36
- = 0.414 < 0.55 ... .o.k
dp 650
50 250
-.--l~.",t--I"---i~I A~=640mm2
T-'~'-'"
5~ ._._.... _ Aps=580mm2
- .-.-e-.- As =1220mm2
- ' - - - - . , . - ' - -_ _--.1
50 t
635 636
This increase in the concrete strain (from compression to tension) is balanced
Solution by an increase in the steel strain of the same amount (0.000306).
_ 648000 + 648000 x 275x 275 =9.03 N Imm 2 The increase in' strain from overload to ultimate equals:
fee - 250x750 8.79x109 .
=0.003 d p -c =0.003 650-269.80 =0.0042
&pe C 269.80
= fee = 9.03 = 0.000306
eee Ee 29516
638
637
Step 4: Calculate total strain at ultimate (Bps) Step 5: Recalculate the total strain at ultimate
Assume that hs= 1725N/mm2
Bps =cpe+cce+cpc
0.67x45x250a 640 x 400 1220x400 580xl725
C ps =00058+0.0003+0.0042=0.0103 ------+--- ----+----
. 1.5 1.15 1.15 1.15
The stress corresponding to this strain can be obtained using the idealized a=213.3 mm
stress-strain curve specified by the ECP 203. Referring to the figure below and
recalling that the ultimate prestressing steel strain is given as 0.04, hs can be c =~= 213.3 =266.6 mm
obtained as follows: 0.8 0.8
h .11.15
= 0.003 d p -c = 0.003 650 - 266.6 = 0.0043
h /1.15 i--------:::=---r--- cpc c 266.6
hyl1.l5
The calculated hs is very close to the assumed value (usually from 1-2% is
close enough), the prestressing steel stress at ultimate and equals=I725 N/mm2
2
f py =0.9xfpu =0.9xI900=1710 Nlmm Note: Comparing the value ofhs obtained using the simplified method (1747
N/mm2) to that obtained using the strain compatibility method, one can notice
Bpy _ fpy __1_7_10_ _ = 0.0077 that the simplified method overestimateshs.
Ys 1.15xEp 1.15 x 193000
2
=1710+ (0.0103-0.0077) x(1900-1710) hs=I725.3 N/mm
ips (0.040-0.0077)
2
Since it has been assumed thaths=1750 N/mm ,another trial is required.
639 640
8.4 Combined Flexure and Axial Loads. Noting that the force Tc is tension, the equilibrium of the forces gives:
Prestressed members subjected to eccentric loading may be encountered in p = 0.67 feu b a A;s f;s Aps fps
prestressed concrete construction. The analyses of. such sections at the service --'--'- ...................... (S.3S)
u 1.5 1.15 1.15
load level and the ultimate stage are outlined in the next two sections.
Having detennined c, cpc and i pc are computed using compatibility of stains as
8.4.1 Stresses at Service Loads follows:
The stresses at service loads for sections subjected to combined flexure and
d -c
axial loads can be determined according to the following equation: cpe =0.003 - - ..................................................... (S.39a)
c
f = -(~+~)± P Xe y +M xy ......................... (S.37) , c- d ' ,
A A I. I cpe = 0.003 - - .................................................... (S.39b)
c .
Where N is the applied axial load (positive sign indicates a compression force)
To simplify the calculations of Cce and c~e, it will be assumed that the
8.4.2 Capacity at Ultimate Loads prestressing forces resulting from Aps and A ~s are such that the effective
prestressing is at the C.G. of the section, producing unifonn compressive strains
Prestressed concrete members subjected to combined flexure and axial load are as shown in Fig. S.13.
. designed using the strain compatibility as outlined in the previous section. The
strains in prestressing steel located at the compression and the tension zones are
calculated. The stress-strain curve for the prestressing reinforcement is used to Cee =c:e = A:E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
e e
(S.39c)
determine the stresses. A trial-and-adjustment procedure is carried out to
compute the resulting forces and moments. The neutral axis distance c is The total prestressing strains ips and c~s are calculated as follows:
assumed, and the corresponding forces are calculated. Adjusting c in Eq. S.3S
is repeated u~til equilibrium is achieved. C;s =c;e -(c;e -cee) ..................................... (S.40a)
liPs
Fig. 8.13 Strain and stress distributions for the beam subject to P", Mu
641 642
Example 8.10: Strain compatibility method for combined flexure Solution
and axial load .
The approximate code equation can not be used to calculate iPs when
If the cross-section shown in figure is subjected to P u=360 kN, compute the prestressing steel is located in the compression zone. In such a case, the strain
ultimate flexural capacity. The losses may be assumed as 12%, and the ultimate compatibility procedure must be used.
strain for low relaxation prestressing strands is 0.045.
Data Step 1: Calculate the initial prestressing strain (epe)
feu =45 N/mm2
For low relaxation strands, fr,y= 0.9 fr,u= 0.9 x 1860 =1674 N/mm2
/p = 1860 N/mm2
0.70 fpu = 0.7xI860= 1302 N I mm 2
Ep = 196000 N/mm2 f . = smaller of
pI { 0.8 fpy = 0.8x1674 = 1339 N I mm 2
/pi=1302 N/mm
2
300
50
...
~ fpe = (I-losses) f pi =(1-0.12) 1302=1145.76 Nlmm 2
50 -r -
Step 2: Calculate the decompression strain (ece)
643 644
A- Compression force in the concrete
A ~s=150 0.67 feu 11.5 C == 0.67 fcu b x (0.8 c) == 0.67x45x300xO.80 c x_ 1_ == 4.824 c kN
'--_.--._-h--Lr-_ _-I-~I-__.I 1"" ==~s xf;.,11.15 c 1.5 1.5 1000
B- Strain for the prestressing steel in the, tension zone
o
o
Irl
c
pc
= 0.003 d p -c = 0.003 500-c
u c c
• Aps==150 500-c
• Cps ==cpe+cce+cpc cps == 0.0058 + 0.00007 + 0.003 - -
c
,. 300
C py _ f py == 1674 == 0.00742
0.0058
Y.,. 1.15xE p 1.15 x 196000
The previous equation is a non-linear equation with one unknown "c". To solve
the equation, a trial and adjustment procedure is followed through assuming c , c-~)
cps == 0.0058 + 0,00007 - 0.003 - c- (
and calculating the corresponding strains and stresses in the prestressing steel in
the tension and compression zones as follows: .
, (cps -0.00742) ( ) ,
f ps = 1674 + x 1860 -1674 ..... __ .................. C > c py 11.15
(0.045 - 0.00742) ps
645
646
Step 4: Calculate the flexural strength.
From the previous table it can be determined that Cc = 685 kN, Tc = 102.3 kN,
and Tp= 222.3 kN. The moment strength can be calculated by taking moments
about Pu, located at the centroid of the section as follows:
/pil.15
Mu (.!...-~)-Tc2
(.!...-d')+TP2
(.!...-cover)
---r
= C
c22
/P/1.15 I--------=..-r"~
J"J1.l5 Mu = 685 (0.~5 0.8X~.142) -102.3 (0.~5 -0.05) + 222.3 (0;5 -0.05)
Mu =176.4 kN.m
I
I
It is clear from the table that the neutral axis distance c =142 mm gives very Photo 8.6 Prestressed concrete .beams in 15th May bridge befor ~
close value (360.5 kN) when compared with the applied force (360 kN). the construction of the concrete deck
647 648
T-sections and wide flange I-sections are appropriate if large eccentricity is
8.5 Proper Beam Shape Selection required as shown in Fig. 8.14. In such a case, the end ·section of the be~ is
usually solid to avoid large eccentricity, and to increase the shear capaclty.
Some of the prestressed concrete beams are fabricated in precast plants that Double T -sections· are also used because of their stability and ease of handling.
frequently publish tables containing the properties of the cross-section and the They are widely used in floor systems in buildings because they eliminate the
uniform load that can support. However, in most cases the designer may have to need for slabs. Long-span parking garages may 'require I-sections with
establish the shape of the cross-section to be used in a special project. This is composite slab topping. '
typically the case in bridge construction. For a simply supported beam, the
eccentricity is inversely proportional to the required prestressing force. The If the self-weight is small compared to the superimposed dead and live loads, a
larger the eccentricity at mid-span, the smaller the required prestressing force. larger lower flange is needed to carry the heavy compressive strength produced
by the prestressing force. For long-span bridges, hollow box sections are ofte~
A rectangular section is the easiest in· fabrication, alignment and the least in more economical. These sections have large torsional capacity. Also, thelr
form cost. It is frequently used in buildings and parking garages. Bearing in flexural strength to weight ratio is ·telatively high compared to other
mind that the dead loads may represent a large portion of the total loads on the prestressing systems.
structure, flanged sections are structurally more efficient because of their high
moment of inertia with respect to their self weight. 8.6 Limiting Eccentricity Envelopes
The tensile stress in the extreme fiber under service load conditions should not
exceed the limit specified by the code. Thus, it is important to establish the
limiting zone in the concrete section. For example, for a simply supported beam
at transfer if no tension is allowed for the top fiber, then:
Solving Eq. (8,42) for the eccentricity gives the lower kern point kb as:
fbOI/Om
k =-
I
=0=- ~
Zbol
A
P Pexe
-Z- .............................. (8.44)
bOI
T-section Box section Box section With 'If the eccentricity exceeds the upper kern kt, it will cause teI\sion at the final
with bottom enlargement cantilever slabs stage.
Similarly, kern point can be established for the right and left parts about the line
2
of symmetry of the section. For rectangular sections, Ztop=ZboFb t /6, giving the
Fig. 8.14 Different types of prestressed concrete sections kern points as shown in Fig 8;15.
650
649
t AB can be seen from the previous section, any force falling in the kern area will
kb = kl =6" (for rectangular sections only) .......... (8.46) never cause tension at the section. However, many codes, including the ECP
203, allow tension stress at bottom and top fibers (Cases B, C and D). Thus, it is
important to establish the limiting envelope at the maximum allowable tension
because it is desirable that the designed eccentricities of the tendon along the
span fall within these limits.
At transfer, the top fiber is subjected to tension while the bottom fibers are
subjected to compression. Thus, the eccentricity eL at transfer (as shown in Fig.
8.16) at which the top fibers are subjected to the maximum allowable tension is
given by:
1--~-1
Fig. 8.15 Central kern area for a rectangular section
~nsionwnel
I U4 ... U4 -'---"-+1-'-- U4 - _.. -+/---- U4-1
Fig. 8.16 Envelope permitting tension in concrete extreme fibers.
At full service load, the bottom fibers are subjected to tension while top fibers
are subjected to compression. The allowable concrete tensile stress should be
obtained from Table 8.2. For example, for case B the eccentricity eu (as shown
in Fig. 8.16) at which the bottom fibers are subjected to the maximum
allowable tension is given by:
651 652
Example 8.11: Upper and lower envelopes Solution
The cross-section of a simply supported beam is shown in the figure. The beam
is post-tensioned and the prestressing cable is parabolic. Determine the limiting Step 1: Calculate section properties
envelopes such that the limiting concrete tensile stress is in accordance with the
ECP 203 Case B. Consider the mid-span, the quarter span, and at the support as A = 400 x 200 + 150x700 + 400x300 = 305000 mm 2
the controlling points. Assume that:
Since the section is not symmetrical, calculate the location of the center of
gravity.
Pi = 2400 kN
Pe = 2050kN = 400 x 200 x 100 +150x700x550+ 400 x 300x 1050 =628.7 mm
Y 305000
2
!cu =40N/mm
3 3
2
!cui =30N/mm 1= 400 x 200 + 400 x 200 x (628.7 -lOOY + 150x700 + 150x700x(628.7 -550?
12 12
WOL =5kN/m 3
+ 400x300 +400x300x(1050-628.7?
Wu = 18 kN/m' 12
I =4.98 x 10 10 mm4
1 1
ytop= Y =628.7 mm
I 4.98xlOlO = 79.16x106 mm 3
~ L=21m
-I Z/oP = - = 628.7
Y/oP
Tfr"50
§
o
It o
o
t- _.- _. ._._--l--
300
·T r- 400
-J
II
Beam cross-section
653 654
Step 3: Upper and lower envelops at quarter point
. The moment at the quarter point for a uniformly loaded beam is given by:
Wtot =Wow +W DL +W LL = 7.625 +5+18 =30.625 kN 1m'
, wxL L W (L)2 3 (WXL2) 3
M=--x---x - =-x - - =-M
The llllowable tensile stresses at transfer fti and at full service load fie for case B 2 4 2 4 4' 8 4 atmid:,pan
are given by:
r~s7
~ ....... '
658
B- At Transfer (bottom fibers) (compression controls) D- At Full service load (top fibers) (compression controls)
The stresses at bottom fibers at transfer should be less than the allowable
compressive stress at transfer recommended by the code ifcj) as follows: hop = - Pe + Pe Xe _ Mtolal 'C. fee (because fee is negative) ............. (8.63)
A Ztop Ztop
JI'"bot -_ _ l';_p;xe + Mow>!.
- ci (becauseJc,Is
1'".' .)
negatIve ............ (854)
.
. A Zbot Zbot !. ::;_;xP;+;XP;Xe_Mtotal .:........................... (8.64)
ee A ZIOP Ztop
Thus,
fe' ::; - p; _ p; X e + Mow .......................................... (8.55) e'C. ;:~[ZI(JP fce+M'(J,al]+ Z; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (8.65)
I A Zbot Zbot
The eccentricity that gives the acceptable stress at top should be greater than:
The eccentricity that gives the acceptable stress at bottom should be less than:
e 'C. ; : p; [ZI(JP fee + Mlolal]+ Kb ........................~ ....... (8.66)
e::; ~ [- Zbot fei + M oJ- Z;t ................................. (8.56)
I
~ ::; [_ Zbot ;:+K;'total]I ; ........................ (8.62) Photo 8.8 Cable placement in a box girder
659 660
The four governing equations can be summarized in the following table. Example 8.12: Determination of P and e combinations
The cross-section of a simply supported beam with unbonded tendons is shown
~>e-Kb
in figure. It is required to:
1>; - [Zt(}P hi + Mow] (1) A. Determine the acceptable combinations of Pi and e at mid-span according to
~> e+Kt the ECP 203 allowable stresses for case B.
1>; - [- Zbot fei + M owl (2) B. Check the combinations of the following prestressing force and eccentricity:
~< e+Kt
1>; - [- Zbot /'e + M ta/al ]/ ~ (3)
Case Pi (leN) e(mm)
~< e-Kb
1>; - [Zwp fee + M total J/ ~ (4)
1 2700 400.00
2 2000 250.00
All the terms appearing in the previous equations are known and can be 3 3000 250.00
determined except P j and e. there are a number of combinations of these terms
satisfy all the equations. The right combination can be determined by plotting 4 3000 450.00
each equation as shown in Fig. 8.17. In this graph, the horizontal axis represents
the eccentricity, while the vertical axis represents the inverse of the initial
prestressing force. The hatched area in the figure indicates the acceptable Data
combinations of (lip; and e) that satisfy all code requirements of allowable Losses =15%
stress in transfer and full service load stages. It should be noted that some of feu =45 N/mm2
the possible eccentricities may not be attainable because they might lie outside fcui =31.5 N/mm2
the limits of the section. Therefore, these points should be excluded from the Wu =21 leN/m'
acceptable zone as shown in Fig. 8.17. span =20.0m
~ 1- -1
500
physical limit
150 L -.J
Transfer
-------Service
Combinations
outside the
section
TT
o
o
200- -
r-
final
(bottom)
ft.
e
1- -1 800
Beam cross-section
Fig. 8.17 Graphical representation for the four governing equations
662
661
Solution 415000
wow =Yc xA =25x =1O.375kNlm'
. 1000000
Step 1: Calculate .section properties
WIOI = wow + Wu =10.375 + 21 =31.375 kN I m'
2
A = 500x150+ 200 x 700 + 250 x 800 = 415000 mm
10 5 2'
M ow = .37 8x20
. =51875kN
..m
Since the section is not symmetrical, calculate the location of the center of
gravity.
31.375x20 2
. = 500xI50x75+200x700x500+250x800x975 =652.1 mm M lo,al = 8 = 1568.8 kN.m
Y 415000
I =5.6 x 10 10 mm4
Step 2: Governing equations
Ytop= Y =652.1 mm
Ybol = t- Y = (150+700+ 250)-652.1 = 447.9 mm Step 2.1: Equation at transfer (top fibers-tension controls)
10
The allowable tension stress at transfer fli is given by:
ZIOP =_1_= 5.6x10 = 85.83x106 mm 3
YIOp 652.1 fli = 0.22~ feui = 0.22·J31.5 = 1.235 N I mm 2
K = Ztop
6
85.83x10 = 206.81 mm ~> e-Kb
b A 415000 P; - [Z/oP fli +MoJ
10
I -
- - _ 5.6 X10 -125 106 mm 3 1 > e-206.8
Zb - X
[85.8x10 6 x 1.235 I 1000 + 518.75x1000]
-
01 Ybo/ 447.9 P;
6
K = = 125x10 = 301.2 mm
ZbOI ~ ~ 1.6 X10-6 (e - 206.8)
I A 415000 P;
±r1=------,I
0\
r-:
~
~
IL0 ~> e+Kt
• ;:.
-'--
P; - [-Zbol fei +MoJ
1> e+301.1
1-- 800 -1 P; [-125X10 6 X-14.175/1000+518.75X1000]
beam cross section
~~0.436xlO-6 (e +301.1) .
Pi
663 664
e -301.1 700
Step 3: Acceptable Pi-eo diagram
I l/Pi
I 0
I 4.37 X 10-4
I 1"1.
From the points calculated iti~:Step 2, the acceptable combinations diagram can
Step 2.3: Equation at full service load (bottom fibers-tension be plotted as shown in figure. Assuming concrete cover of 70 mm, the
controls) maximum acceptable eccentricity emaxequals:
Since the beam has un-bonded tendons, it is classified as case B (refer to Table emax = Ybol - cover = 414.3 -70 = 344.3 mm
8.2). Thus, the allowable tension is given by:
Locating the points inside the diagram and realizing that any point falling inside
he = 0.44.fi: = 0.44.J4s = 2.95 N 1mm 2 the hatched area is considered safe and vice versa, the following table can be
established.
.; = I-losses = 1- 0.15 = 0.85
1 e+KI
-< e(mm) lIP (x 10-4 )
F: - [- Zb(}1 he + M lnlal ]/'; Case P(kN) Status Reason
inside the acceptable
1 e +301.1
6 1 2700 400.0 3.70 Unsafe area but outside the
F: <{-125XI0 X 2.9511000 + 1568.8XlOOO]/0.85
section
outside the acceptable
~ ~0.708xlO-6 (e + 301.1) 2 2000 250.0 5 Unsafe
area
Pi
e -301.1 700 inside the acceptable
3 3000 250.0 3.33 Safe
4
area
0 7.09 X 10
I l/Pi
I I I 4 3000 450.0 3.33 Unsafe
outside the acceptable
area
Step 2.4 Equation at full service load (top fibers -compression
controls)
2
fei = -0040 feu = -0040 X45.0 = -18 N 1mm
1
_< e-Kb
F: - [ZIOP fee + M IOlal ]1 .;
1 e-206.8
F: < [85.8X10 6 x-18/1000 + 1568.8 X1000]1 0.85
..!...~34.8xlO-6 (e-206.8)
F:
e 206.8 225
0 604 X 104
I l/Pi
I I I
665
666
c3 Example 8.13: Determination of P and e combinations
c.5
E
C'<I e llla , ', The cross-section of a simply supported beam is shown in the figure below. The
~ +-------------~., beam is a part of the structural system of a chemical factory. It is required to:
A. Determine the acceptable combinations of Pi and e at mid-span according to
the ECP 203 allowable stresses for case B. Adjust the cross-section
,,, dimensions if necessary.
,
,----+ :
Data
. .-~------.-: _.._-_ ...
Losses =20%
I 2 =50N/mm
2
feu
2
feui = 35N/mm
WDL = 5 kN/m'
4- = lOkN/m'
Wu
span = 12m
I. _ _------,~Il
3
1000
-~I~ I 200
H200
Section A-A
I~
667 668
Solution
Ytop=185.6
Step 1: Calculate section properties
670
1 > e+59.27 -.!:..:=; -2.322 X10-6 (e -132.2)
P; [-16.6X10 6 X-15.75/1000+126X1000] P;
-.!:..~2.58xlO-6 (e+59.27)
P;
I~32.2
t
600 200
1 -10.8 x 10
4 1-7.7 X 10-4
e -59.27 600 ..;.!,
4
17.01 X 10
j
-.!:..< e+ K t
P; - [- Zbot /'e + Mtotal]/;
1 < e+59.2
P; [-16.6X10 6 X3.1l/1000+396x1000]/0.80
e -59.2 600
I/pi o 15.3 X 104
2
fei = -0.40 feu = -D.40 X 50.0 = -20 N 1 mm
Assuming a concrete cover of 70 mm, the maximum acceptable eccentricity
emax equals:
1
_< e-Kb
e max =Ybot -cover =414.3-70=344.3 mm
P; - [Ztop fee + M total ]1 ;
1 < e-132.2 It is clear from the diagram that the acceptable zone does not exist. For example
P; [37.02X10 6 X-20/1000+396X1000]/0.80 an initial prestressing force of 200 kN (1IPi=5) and an eccentricity of 150 mm
give the following stresses:
672
671
At Transfer YIOP= Y =250 mm
The reason for the unsatisfactory performance of this section is attributed to the K '_
-Zbot
-- _ 29.57xlO -- 92 .4 mm
I A 2320000
fact that its size is not sufficient to resist the applied loads. One of the solutions
is to increase the size of the section. Increasing the section dimension by 200 320000 I
M ow =l44kN.m
W =Y xA=25x =8.0kNlm
mm gives the following section properties: a.1V c 1000000
-,-
~ ________1_00_0____ ~ ~·1~ __
Step 4.1 Governing equations
o
o00
._._CG:._._ ._
T J+,
It
=0 • 22 -V~
Jcui =0.22$s = 1.302 N Imm
2
~> e-Kb
I~O?I
1 e-203.3
p; > [65.06 x 10 6 x 1.302/1000 + 144 x 1000]
~;:::4.37XI0-6 (e-203.3)
A= 1000 x 200 + 200x600 = 320000 mm 2 p;
Since the section is not symmetrical, calculate the location of the center of
gravity.
e 203.3 600
= 1000 x 200 x 100 + 200 x 600 x 500 = 250 mm o 17.35 X 10-4
Y 320000
I =1.63 x 10 10 mm4
673 674
Step 4.1.2 At transfer (bottom fibers-compression controls) Step 4.2 Acceptable Pi-e diagram
1 e+92.42 From the points calculated in step 4.1 ,the following diagram can be plotted:
~ > [-29.57X10 6 X-15.75/1Ooo+144X1000]
J..~1.64XlO-6 (e+92.42) 18
~
16
Acceptable
e -92.42 600 14 combination of Pi, e
11.35 X 104
I lIPi
I 0
I I ,-...
~;::..
12 I
·1
I
10
Step 4.1.3 Equation at full service load (bottom fibers-tension b....
x 8
controls) r::;
1 . e+92.42
....-- 6
~
200 300 400 500 600
-200 -100 o 100
e -92.42 600 e(mm)
4
I lIPi
I 0
I 17.2 X 10-
I
Step 4.1.4 Equation at full service load (top fibers-compression
controls)
1 < e-203.3
~. 6
l65.07X10 X-20/1Ooo+414X1000]/0.80
J..S-9.015xlO-6 (e-203.3)
~
I lIPi
I 0
I -3.58 X 104
I 3.64 x 104
I
675 676
8.8 Reduction of Prestressing Force near Supports 8.9 Deflection of Prestressed Beams
Sections with straight tendons at supports are subjected to zero moment and
8.9.1 'Introduction
may suffer from h.igh tensile stresses resulting from the prestressing force. Deflection of prestressed concrete beams is of a great importance because they
There are two practIcal methods of reducing the high stresses near the supports: are more slender than ordinary reinforced concrete beams.
1. Reducing the eccentricity of some cables as the reach the support At transfer, prestressed concrete beams are subjected mainly to an eccentric
zone as shown in Fig. 8.18.a. compression force that produces reverse deflection (camber). The amount of
camber should be controlled for proper drainage of roofs in buildings.
2. Sheathing .som.e ?f the cables by plastic ~bing as shown in Fig. Moreover, in projects involving prestressed beams and precast slabs, excessive
8.18.b. ThIS elImmates the transfer of the prestressing force to the
camber may prohibit proper alignment of the precast members.
,". concrete at this area.
At the final stage where all the working loads are applied, the upward
deflection of the beam (camber) becomes downward deflection. Excessive
CL deflections of beams may cause excessive vibrations, damage to the
appearance of the structure, poor roof drainage, and uncomfortable feelings for
raised tendons I
I
the occupants. Also, such deflections may damage partitions and cause poor
-------------------------t--------~.~- ----------------- fitting of doors and windows.
(a)
CL
I
i
j;:~~-~~~--~~-~~---------------;----------------------------;
I
___________ ~
i I
c:::=::::::
'
1 - 1_ _ _ -1
tendons ,
tendons
sheathed (b) sheathed
677 678
T
!
8.9.2 Calculations of Deflections - ECP 203 A-Calculation of the effeCtive moment of inertia (Ie)
The procedures for calculating the deflections of prestressed concrete beams The ECP 203 gives the following expression for calculating the effective
are summarized as follows:
+-(~:) ']
moment of inertia:
1- The calculation of the expected camber of prestressed beams at transfer
should be carried out using the gross moment of inertia of the cross- f, =(~:)' f, f,: sf, ..................... (8.70)
r
section Ig • Such a camber should be limited to the values that do not
cause problems to the project under consideration. It is the task of the
designer to judge the allowable value of the camber.
i.e(~: ~1
2- When calculating the immediate (short-term) deflection, the gross
moment of inertia of the cross-section Ig is used for cases A, B, and C. The previous equation can be simplified as follows:
For case D, the effective moment of inertia of the cross-section Ie is
used. Limits of the short-term deflection for prestressed concrete beams
are the same as those for reinforced concrete beams.
I =1 +(1 -I
e cr g cr
)(MM )3 ........................................ (8.71)
cr
a
b b
B
I _I z B
'-'7'-' -----]~
1- • 1 I- •I ts
t1
T
'"0 Po
'"0
_J ~_l
I
"0
n As --- •
•••
N.A
Aps
"0
•
n As--- •••
Aps
neutral
I
1---1 axis
cracked zone b
: ~ nAps
• •• Aps
As
• I
_._._. _.fu\~'\\~~';??;;'i"'~1iA.\. Neutral axis inside the flange z<ts Neutral axis outside the flange z>ts
Cracked section Transformed section Fig. 8.21 Determination of the neutral axis for T -sections
682
681
Example 8.14 Solution
The figure shows a simply supported full prestressed beam with straight Step 1: Calculation of immediate deflection
tendons at an eccentricity of 100 mm. The initial tendon force is 1200 kN and Step 1.1: Deflection due to self weight
the effective prestressing force is 950 kN. Compute the initial camber at mid-
2
span due to prestressing and self weight of the beam. If the beam is left without 1f:=4400.J4Q = 27828N Imm 2 = 27.828kN Imm
Ec =4400 "'leu
being subjected to any additional loads for a long period of time, calculate the
long term camber. w = {250x550)x 25 =3.44kNlm'
ow 1000 X 1000
feu =40 N/mm2
2
M - WOW XL2 = 3.44x9 = 34.83 kN.m
ow 8 8
Since the beam is fully prestressed (case A), the gross moment of inertia is
o.w
used in deflection calculations.
o 3 3
o..... I =b t = 250x550 =3.47x109 mm 4
12 12
I g
-----'----'---;:- . mm i(camb)
120000 x (9000)2 = 126 er
• 8x27.828x3.47x10 9
Beam Section
683 684
Step 1.3: Immediate camber/deflection Example 8.15
The immediate camber equals: Compute the immediate camber at midspan for the beam shown in figure. The
initial prestressing force in the broken tendon is 1500 kN and in the straight
!:low +p =!:lp -!:low = 12.6 i -3.043 J..= 9.55 mm i cable is 300 kN. The beam maybe classified as zone B.icu =45 N/mm2
For long term calculations, the effective prestressing force (Pe)is used. Thus,
the moment at the supports Me equals: 750
Me = P. Xe = 950x 100 = 95000 kN .mm l I
100
1• .I
I
1 2 95000 x (9000)2
!:l -(1
p(long-tenn) -
)Me L2
+ a 8E I
c g
( + ) 8x27.828x3.47x109
29.88mm i
0
T
0
00
Step 2.3: Long-term camber/deflection
The long-term camber equals:
•
!:ld+p =!:lp -!:ld = 29.88-9.13 = 20.75mm i (camber) • Asp
1---1
200
Beam Section
685 686
Solution
w = {75000 + 140000) x 25 =5.375 kN I m '
Step 1: Calculate uncracked section properties ow . 1000 x 1000
Since the beam is categorized in zone B, the gross moment of inertia is used in
the calculations. Since the section is not symmetrical, calculate the C.G.
The deflection of simply supported beam subjected to uniform load equals:
y = 310.46 mm
o
o
00
ow-5.375 kN/m'
Ybot=489.53 mm
uncracked section
Step 3: Camber due to prestressing
Al = 200 x 700 = 140000 mm 2 Yt=450mm The camber due to prestressing is the sum of two components:
• End moment (due to eccentricity of the two cables at support)
~ = 750 x 100 = 75000 mm 2
• Due to the concentrated load developed from the tendon slope change
- = 140000 x 450 + 75000x50 =310.465 mm
y 140000 + 75000 !1 p =!1 pm + !1 pw
Y bOI = 800 - 310.46 = 489.53 mm
Deflection due to end moments Llpm
3
3
The moment at the supports due to the broken cable Mil equals
I = 200x700 + 140000X(450-31O.46)2 + 750x100 + 75000 x (310.46-50)2 MiI=Pilxe I
g 12 12
e l =85 mm t
Mil = 1500x85 = 127500 kN .mm (positive moment) .
Step 2: Deflection due to self weight The moment at the supports due to the straight cable Mi2 equals:
Mi2 =P;2 xe 2
The concrete modulus of elasticity equals:
e 2 =y bOI -cover = 489.53-100 =389.53 mm t
Ec = 4400 K = 4400.J45 = 29516N Imm 2 = 29.516kN Imm 2
M i2 = 300X389.53 = 116859kN .mm (negative moment)
687
688
The immediate deflection at mid span due to the positive end moments equals: Alternatively, the equivalent force at midspan may be calculated as follows:
V = P; (tan81 + tan ( 2 ) = P; (81 + ( 2 ) (true for small angles)
/).
pm
=Mre
8E c I g
t
8
1
= 82 = (85 + 350) / 1000 = 0.0791
5.5
10641 X (11 X 1000)2
/).pm = 9 =0.401mm t (Downward deflection) V = 1500x(0.0791 +0.0791) = 237.3 kN
8x29.516xI3.6xlO S
S
8 0\ .....
~ ~ 8
.....
;Q ~ ~ ~~;Q 85
C'l...... \0
.......
Ii'
a
~
0
....... -c
....... C'l
.....
-.L
:( (: l .
I!. II . . II I).. II
I. 11.0 m .1 5.5m
/ .. -I- 5.5m
.I
Deflection due to concentrated load
The immediate camber at midspan due to the equivalent concentrated load V
The camber due to the broken cable can be calculated using an equivalent equals:
concentrated load usually called the balanced load. The calculations of such V L3 .
/). pv = 48E I i
_ ~~~7f£~:
load are as follows:
c
VxL
--=p;xe t
4
Vx11 = 1500x0.435
4
V =237.3 kN
689 690
Example 8.16 Solution
Step 1: Calculate uncracked section properties
The figure given below shows a simply supported partially prestressed beam
(zone D). The beam is sUbjected to an initial prestressing force of 900 kN and The calculation of the gross moment of inertia shall be carried out by
an effective prestressing force of 740 kN. Calculate the immediate deflection, considering the concrete section and neglecting the prestressing steel as well as
the long-term deflection and check code limits for deflection. The beam is the non-prestressingd steel. Since the section is not symmetrical, the center of
located on a typical floor and support walls that are not likely to be damaged gravity is calculated as follows:
by deflection. wu=1O kN/m', wsv=3 kN/m' (superimposed load),icu=35 N/mm2
, and n=1O. Y2
650
T T
15.0m 1-1
I· •1 180
uncracked section
~ = 650x120 = 78000 mm
2
Y2=60mm
120 I
L...-_ _.., I
A=A +~ = 213000mm2
oV) 135000x495+78000x60 335.7 mm
r-- Y 213000
1
3
180 7503 650x120 2
I = x + 135000x (495-335.7)2 + + 78000 x (335.7 -60)
100 •
1--_ _-'" Non- prestressing steel
g 12 12
T 1-1
180 Ig=15.77 x10 mm
9 4
691 692
Step 2: Calculate immediate deflection / camber 11 = M i L2 = 31500x(15000)2 = 2.15mm t (u ward)
Step 2.1: Deflection due to self-weight pm 8Ee I g 8x26.03x15.77x109 P
Since at transfer only the self weight is applied, the gross moment of inertia
may be used for deflection calculations
Camber due to curved tendon
Ec = 4400..JJ: = 4400.J35 = 26030N Imm 2 = 26.03kN Imm 2
The self weight of the beam equals 11 =11 +11
25 . Mi=(31500kNom w,.=l1.04kN/m' _-------~--- ,. . ,. ","3)1500
= 213000 x
j;-n-flITf , If t~t ,-{nus,
Wow =5.325kNlm'
1000 x 1000
The deflection of simply supported beam subjected to uniform load equals:
4
11 = 5wowxL 5x(5.325/1000)x(15000)4 =8.55mm t (downward)
384x26~03xI5.77x109 15.0m
ow 384xEe xl g
I· ·1
The effective eccentricity of the curved tendon at midspan (et) equals:
wow=5.325 kN,m'
et =380 - 35 =345 mm
The camber due to the curvature of the cable can be calculated using an
equivalent uniform load usually called the balanced load. The calculations of
15.0m
such load are as follows:
I· . 1
693 694
W,q =11.04 kN 1m' 1 W DL =Wow +W SD = 5.325+3 = 8.325 kN 1m'
4 2
5W,q xL 5x(I1.0411000)x(15000)4 = 17.72mm 1 M DL = W DL L2 = 8.325x15 = 234.14 kN .m
!:l. =---"'-- 8 8
pw 384xEc xl g 384x26.03xI5.77x109
leT calculations
~ :r=- -----------------------~-- --:-------------~~<!~-------------
I It is customary to neglect the area of the non-prestressing steel in deflection
I calculations. The transformed area of prestressing steel equals:
tendon proflle n Aps=lO x 450 = 4500 mm2
d p = Y +e =335.7 +380 = 115.70 mm
J40XlOOO _' 75m
.
.1.
x380 =-12.99 Nlmm'"
7.5m ~I
Assume that the c.g. is located inside the flange. Taking the first moment of
fpc, - 213000 29.53 X106 area for the transformed section about the C.G. gives,
695 696
Step 3.5: Camber due to effective prestressing
The service load deflection at mid-span due to the negative end moments only
equals:
650x zx~ = 4500 (715.70- z)
·2
f1 = Me L2 i
325 z 2 + 4500 z - 3220650 = 0 Pm 8Ec Ie
Solving for z z =92.87 mm < 120 rom (inside the flange as assumed) The moment at the supports equals:
Me = Pe Xe = 740x35 = 25900 kN.m
Cracked moment of inertia Icr = B Z3 + nAps (d p - Z)2
3
3 D. pm Me L2 25900x(15xlOOOf =8.96mm i
I = 650x92.87 + 4500x(715.7-92.87)2 =1.92x10 9 mrr? 8EcIe 8x26.03x3.122x109
cr 3
Step 3.3: Calculate effective moment of inertia
f1
5w DL XL4
=---='---- 5x(8.325/1000)x(15xlOOO)4 = 67.5mm J,. The eccentricity (et)at midspan equals,et :::: 380-35 = 345mm
DL 384xE xl c e 384x26.03x3.122xl09
2
Weq xL
W 10 I --'-- = Pe X e
f1u =~xf1DL =--x67.5 =81.09 mm..v 8
t
W DL 8.325 2
W x15
eq = 740 x 0.345
8
WDL=8.325 knlm' & wu=lO knlm' Weq = 9.08 kN 1m' i
4
f1
_ 5 Weq xL _ 5x (9.08 11000) x (15x 1000)4
- -
= 7361
. mm
i
pw 384xEc xle 384x26.03x3.122x109
15.0m
I· ·1 f1p = f1pm + f1pw = 8.96 i +73.61 i = 82.57 mm i
697 698
~ r-----------------------------------------------~
c.g. et=34~ mm
~ ::-_'':: '':: :::::-~:-~:::::-___ '_-=:'-:::-::-~:-.: t_'.::'_-=:.,,: :.::::-'::-': ::,::._-= ::: ::::..:-.::-..: ::._ 9
SHEAR AND TORSION IN PRESTRESSED
I.. I5.0m
• 1
CONCRETE BEAMS
The beam satisfies the limits of the total deflection. However, the live load
deflection should be checked as follows Photo 9.1 Milwaukee art museum, USA
• The beam is in a floor that supports walls that are not likely to be
damaged by large deflections. Hence, the limiting live load deflection is 9.1 Introduction
given by: This chapter presents procedures for the design of prestressed concrete sections
to resist shear and torsion resulting from externally applied loads. Since the
!l ~~~ lSxlOOO 41.67 m strength of concrete in tension is considerably lower than its strength in
LL 360 360 m compression, design for shear and torsion becomes of major importance in all
types of concrete structures.
Since !lLL (81.09 mm)< !lallowable (41.67 mm) the beam does not meet code
requirements for deflections. The behavior of prestressed concrete beams in shear or combined shear and
torsion is different from their behavior in flexure: they may fail abruptly
699 700
without sufficient advance warning, and the diagonal cracks that develop are
·9.2.2 Effect of Prestressing.
considerably wider than the flexural cracks. Both shear and torsion forces result
in shear stress. Such a stress can result in principal tensile stresses at the critical The shear. web cracks in prestressed beams are attributed to the developing of
section which can exceed the tensile strength of concrete. diagonal tension stresses as shown in Fig 9.2. The maximmll web shear qew
occurs at the C.G. of the section where the actual diagonal tension cracks
9.2 Shear in prestressed Beams develops. Referring to Mohr's circle shown in Fig. 9.2, the principle tensile
stress in concrete due to both compression stress/pee and shear stress qewequals:
9.2.1 Inclined Cracking
Cracking in prestressed concrete beams depends on the magnitude of moment
and shear as shown in Fig. 9.1. At locations where the moment is large and
shear is small, vertical flexural cracks form when the normal tensile strength is
J; = J
(/;cc +q~w _(/;c ). .................................. (9.1)
exceeded.
tan2B
Two types of inclined cracking occur in prestressed concrete beams; web shear ifpccqcw·12) ........................................... (9.2)
cracking andflexure~shear cracking. These two types of inclined cracking are
where /pee is the concrete compressive stress due to effective prestressing at the
illustrated in Fig. 9.1.
C.G. leveL However, if the neutral axis falls inside the flange for flanged
Web-shear cracking begins at the centroidal axis of the cross section when the sections, the $tress is calculated at the intersection of the flange and the web.
principal tensile stresses due to shear exceeds the tensile strength of concrete.
It is clear from Mohr's circle that the normal compressive stress /pee reduces the
Web shear cracking occurs in the regions where moment is small and shear is
large. maximum principle tensionj; and the angle e. Therefore if cracking occurs, the
inclined crack is flatter and the effectiveness of the stirrups increases.
Flexure-shear cracking is essentially an extension of a vertical flexural
cracking. The flexure-shear crack develops when the principal tensile stress due
to combined shear and flexural tensile stresses exceed the tensile strength of
concrete. It should be mentioned that web-shear .cracks usually occur in thin-
walled I-beams near the C.G. where the shear stresses in the web are high while
the flexural stresses are low.
/pee 12
applied loads
Maximum shear stress
I
I
I
I
I
Normal stress
I
I
Web- Flexural and Web- end I
qu =~ ..................................................... (9.4a)
bxd p
Grouted tendons
~~~--------~.
with diameter <\> . Non-prestressed beams
703 704
9.2.3.2 Shear Strength Provided by Concrete qcu B: Concrete Shear Strength Using Detailed Procedure
The ECP 203 gives two procedures for calculating concrete shear strength qcu of Although the use of the simplified method for calcul~ting concrete ~he~
prestressed beams as follows: strength is quite easy, it may produce very. conservatlve ~esults. ThI~ IS
especially true for I-sections. The shear strength calculated usmg the. det~I~ed
• Simplified procedure
procedure can be as high as 150% of that calcul,ated using the sImphfied
• Detailed procedure procedure. Therefore, when the tendon stress is below 0.4 jpu, or when the full
concrete shear strength need to be utilized, the shear strength can be evaluated
A: Concrete Shear Strength Using the Simplified Procedure using the detailed procedure.
Several empirical expressions that predict shear strength of concrete have been For a thin-walled section (I-beam), with small shear spans, the shear stresses in
developeq from experimental studies of prestressed beams. For prestressed the web are high while the flexural stresses are low. The principal stresses at the
members in which the tendons are stressed to at least 40% of their ultimate neutral axis may exceed those at the bottom flange causing cracking to start. at
tensile strength jpu, the nominal concrete shear strength can be conservatively the web. This is called web-cracking shear. On the other hand, for beams WIth
estimated by the following ECP 203 expression: relatively large shear span, vertical flexural cracks occur first and ~xtend
diagonally due stress redistribution. This is called the flexural-shear cracking.
q cu
o
Itc
= 0.045 ....E!...
Y
+
3.6xQ xd
Mup>
u
r.
- 0. 24v)fF{":":"/
cu I fc
~ 0.375.Jfcu / Yc
............... (9.6)
According to the ECP 203, the concrete shear strength qcu is the smaller value
of the flexural shear strength qci and the web-cracking shear strength qcw'
qci
qcu = smaller of
with the following condition (Qu;udp ) ~ 1.0 {
qcw
where Qu ;md Mu are the values of shear and bending moment, respectively,
produced by the ultimate loads at the section under consideration. dp is the
distance from the prestressing reinfoI;cement to the outermost compression
fibers.
The term dp used in the previous equation is the actual cable depth. The
previous equation does not give a valid result when either Qu or Mu is small.
For simply supported beams subject to uniform loads, the term Qu dpiMucan be
expressed as:
d p (L-2x)
- - ' - - - .................................... (9.7)
x (L-x)
where L is the span length and x is the distance from the support to the critical
section.
706
705
Flexural-Shear Strength f!ci
The flexural-shear strength is the shear strength of the beam at the time of
l' L3
developing the first flexure-shear crack. Flexure-shear cracking occurs when
flexural cracks, which are initially vertical, become inclined under the influence i
IIIIJJ{IIIJJ Ultimate loads
of shear. Because the flexural-shear strength cannot be predicted by calculating itiC ( factored)
al ,«tin. L
the principal stresses in an uncracked beam, equations for estimating flexural
shear strength are based on experimental tests. This is attributed to the
redistribution of stresses that OCcur at the tip of the flexural crack.
I . Qu
I
The code specifies the following formula to predict the concrete flexural shear
strength qei:
Ultimate shear
(factored)
eu
qci =0.045Jf +0.8 (qd +qi
Yc
X Mer
M max
)~0.24.Jfcu Iyc ............ (9.8)
Where
Ultimate moment
Qi =Qu -Qd ( factored)
Mmax =Mu -Md
Q.
qj = bX'd
Q
q d =d-
bxd Wd
qd is the unfactored shear stress due to dead load only at the critical
section. 1 I iI I
I
J I I I II I I I I I 11 Dead loads
(unfactored)
~--
1. The shear stress required to transform a vertical flexural crack into
inclined crack 0.045.J feu I Yc Moment
(unfactored)
2. The un-factored shear stress 0.8 qd, and
3. The portion of the remaining factored shear stress that will cause a
flexural crack to initially Occur 0.8xql xMer 1M max
Fig. 9.5 Shear and bending moments for calculating qei
707
708
Cracking Moment Mer
T
I Because most of the prestressed beams are designed to remain uncracked during
the lifetime of the structure, the cracking moment is normally higher than the
Concrete beams are assumed to behave elastically as long as the maximum applied moment at full service loads. Furthermore, the ECP 203 requires that
tensile strength of the concrete is not exceeded. A simply supported prestressed prestressed should be designed to withstand at least 1.2 Mer.
beam will crack at the bottom when the tensile strength is exceeded. Thus the
tensile stress at the bottom fibers for simply supported beam equals:
(
PeXeXY t +MerYt ............................... (9.9)
I I
where
Yt . is the distance from the neutral axis to the tension surface
Mer is thecracking.moment
Pe is the effective prestressing force
!ctr is the maximum allowable tension Fig. 9.6 Cracking moment calculations
The term letr = O.4S.JJ: is the tensile strength of concrete for web-shear
Web Shear Strength qew
cracking. Subsisting with this value in the previous equation gives:
In the Egyptian code, the value of the web concrete shear strength is given by:
=.~(0.45.JJ: + P. + Pe Xe XYt) ................. (9.10)
M er
Yt A I q~ =0.24 (!;. +f ~ )+q~ ................................. (9.13)
The code specifies that the value of the unfactored dead load moment at the where
critical section should be subtracted from the cracking moment. Hence, /pee is the concrete stress at the C.G. of the section due to effective prestressing
after considering all losses.
r;:- +-+
Mer =I- ( O.4S..jleu Pe p.xeXYt) -Md ........... (9.11) p"
Yt A I I pee =A
e
qpv is un-factored shear stress due to the vertical component of prestressing Qpv.
The code rewrites the previous equation in terms of stress as follows:
Q pv Iyps _ (p. xsinB)/yps (Ipe Iyps xAps )xsinB
Mer =~(O.4S.JJ: +Ipee -led) .......................... (9.12) qpv = b Xd p' b xd p b xd p
Yt
! where
I. /pee is the compression stress in concrete due to prestressing force after Where yps = LIS. Referring to Fig. 9.7, the vertical component of the
considering all losses calculated at the extreme tension fibers as follows:
prestressing force Qpv at the critical section for straight tendons equals:
= Pe + p"xexYt
I pee A I' Q pv = Pe sin(B) == Pe tan(B) ........................................ (9.14)
!cd is the concrete stress due to dead loads and any sustained live loads
The approximation of using (tan) instead of (sin) is justified because the
calculated at the extreme tension fibers.
eccentricity is very small compared to the span. For beams with straight cables,
the vertical prestressed component equals:
709 710
An alternate method for determining the web shear strength qcw is to limit the
_p em-e.
Qpv - e •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• (9.15) principal tensile stresses at the e.G. of the rectangular sections or at the
x intersection of the web and the flange for flanged sections if the neutral axis
where em is the eccentricity inside the beam and ee is the eccentricity at the end. falls inside the flange. The code states that this limit may be taken as
If the tendon eccentricity is located above the C.G., a negative value of ee 0.25 .JJ: . Substituting with this value for the diagonal tension stress It given
should be used. by Eq. 9.3, the web shear strength qcw can be obtained by solving the resulting
equation as follows:
critical
section
I
I . "
qcw =0.25.JJ: ( f
0.25 ifeu
k J+1 .............................
"~
(9.16)
III Pc ~~~t::t:--:-:-:-~--=-~-~-~--~-~-E-~--=-~j~--~-~--=-=-=-=
.3'
--~-~-=-:--:-:-:--:-:-:-:--:-:-:-:--:-:-~~---Pe
II i
I 9.2.4 Shear Reinforcement Calculations
I If the applied shear stress qu exceeds concrete shear strengthqcu, web
~
;!
I- x . I. L-x
·1 reinforcement must be used according to the following equation:
Fig. 9.7 Vertical prestressing component Qpv for case of straight tendons qsu = qu - qeu ......................................... (9.17)
2 ·
Shear reinforcement is obtained in a similar fashion like ordinary reinforced
In case of using a parabolic tendon, the .angle e may be obtained by
concrete beam. The required vertical stirrups spacing (s) is given by:
differentiating the equation of the parabola as follows:
y = ax 2 , taking the first derivative gives Ast xfy 1.1.15
y' = tan () = sin () = 2ax s= ...................................... (9.18)
bxqsu
Where a is the parabola constant and x is the location of the section measured
Where Ast is the area of the stirrups according to the number of branches as
from the center of the parabola as shown in Fig. 9.8. It can be easily shown for
shown in Fig. 9.9. The area of the provided stirrups should not be less than:
the parabola in Fig. 9.8 that the following expressions are valid:
critical
y
Asb = area of
..
, I, ection one branch
A" =4A,b
.. • •
I."t--I--
x
1-.- - - ' - - - - - UL --------f------ U2
·1 I· b
·1 I· b ·1
Fig. 9.8 Vertical prestressing component Qpv for case of parabolic tendons Fig. 9.9 Stirrups for shear
711 712
Summary of the De~ign for Shear Where
Step 1: Calculate the ultimate shear stresses due to Qu
Qu
qu=b'd
p
Mmax =Mu -Md
Where Qu is calculated at tl2 from the support as follows:
= Md y/
. (t column2 Width)
Q =Shear at column aXlS -w x "2 +
u u
J.cd I
P. Fexexy/
Step 2: Check that section size is adequate I pee - A +~-....::....:...
I
The developed shear stresses due tot shear should stratify the following
equation:
Step 4: Design the web reinforcement
If qu ~
qeu ' then provide minimum stirrups.
~ 0.75 ~I cu
If qu > qeu ' then design shear reinforcement to resists qsu given by:
Ye °qsu = qu -0.5qcu
~4.5 N Imm
2
The spacing of stirrups needed for shear is obtained from:
If qu < qumax' the concrete dimensions ofthe section are adequate. As/ xl y 11.15
s=
If the above condition is not satisfied, one has to increase the dimensions. b xqsu
Step 3: Determine the shear stress carried by concrete Check minimum shear reinforcement
Calculate the concrete contribution to the shear resistance, qcu using: 004
=J;
°
As/,min b S
• . The detailed procedure, qcu is taken as the smaller of the two values:
W
=Yc xA = 25x 258~00 = 6.45kN 1m'
OJV
10 .
o
o
\0
The critical section is at t12 from· the face of the support. Since the column
Aps=1280 mm
2 width (c) is 500 mm, the critical s~ction is at distance Xc from the centerline of
the support. Xc equals:
t c 900 500
X =_+_=_+_=700mm=0.70m
2 2 2 2
T t-
c
500
--i The reaction at the support equals:
R = wu xL = 47.03 x 18 =423.27 kN
u 2 2
8 I
«')
The shear at the critical section equals:
I -~-~- -=-=-=-~~-:bl=-_=_=_b=_~=_=_:::.:g_:__:_:_:_-:-:-:::--:-:-:--:-:-:--=-]- -l
-1=--:-:--:-:-:::--:::-:-:--:-:-:- -:-:-:- Qu =Ru -wu ·xx =423.27-47.03(0.70)=390.35 kN
r---------------------18m-----------------------·~1 M =R .x _
u U c
Wu .xc
2
2
Fig. Ex. 9.1 Tendon profile for Example 9.1 M u = 423.27xO.7 47.03xO.70 = 284.8 kN.m
2
715 716
wu=47.03 kNlm /
Step 4: Check the maximum shear stress qumax
J I
J J
'1
The maximum shear strength is given by:
Ru=wU2
=423.27
p, =O j70
qu,max
= 0.75 .Jf~cu = 0.75 ~~
= 3.62 N I mm 2
[35 = 3.62 N I mTl1,2
.
~ 4.5 N I mm 2
Since qu is less than qu,mllX the concrete dimensions of the section are acceptable.
I Mu=284.80 kN.m
CritiCW=tiotJm= I ~
Step 5: Calculate concrete shear strength qcu
Moment
.Jfcu 3.6xQu xd p · ~
qcu = 0.045 - + M ~O.24~fcu I yc
yc u
• I
I
I
~ 0.375~fcu I yc
423.27
I Qu=390.35 kN
I
Qu xd p = 390.35x(757.811000) = 1.03 > 1.0
Mu 284.77
Shear
Qu xd p _ d p (L-2x) = (757.8/1000)(18.0-2xO.70) =1.03
or ........ M u - x (L-x) 0.70(18-0.7)
Quxd p
Use =1.0
Mu
717 718
Example 9.2: Shear design using the detailed procedure
Step 6: Calculate shear reinforcement
The cross-section of a simply supported beam is shown in Figure Ex 9.2. Using
Since qu (2.86) > qcu (1.81), shear reinforcement is required. the code-detailed .method, determine the required stirrup spacing ({YsF360
The shear stress that needs to be carried by web reinforcement equals: N/mm2) at the critical section. Assume column width of 500 mm. Given that
hu=2000 N/mm2 for normal stress relived strands,fp'= 1080 N/mm2 andfcu=35
qsu _-qu qcu _ 2 86 1.81
-2-' -2=1.955 N Imm
2 N/mm2. Assume that the applied live load is 22 kNlm' and the superimposed
dead load is 2 kN/m'.
For 10 mm stirrups, the total shear reinforcement area for two branches equals:
2
=2x78.5=157 mm
l
ASI
0.4 0.4 2
As1,min =f-
y
b xs =-xI80xI25
360 = 25 mm <Asl (157) • •.0
••
k
T t- 500
-\
o
o
«)
i beamc.g
et>1O @125mm
I- t===~===~---=---=::---==----:::---::----=---=---=----==1--- -l
II ~14--------------------18m---------------------·~1
Shear reinforcement details
Fig. EX.9.2
719 720
Solution e = 300 + (400 - 300) x ~ = 307.8 mm
(18/2)
In the detailed procedure, the concrete shear strength is taken as the smaller of
two vales qci (flexural-shear strength) and qcw (web-cracking shear strength). d = 750+ 0.70 x(400-300) = 757.8mm
p 9
Step 1: Calculate qci
P. =i pe xAps = 1080x 12801 1000 = 1382.4 kN
qci = 0.045Ji
cu
+ 0.8 (qd +qi x M cr ) ~ 0.24~icu 1Yc
Yc M max
Step 1.1: Calculate Mer o !
3
1 = 2X[500X150 +500X150X(450-75 ]+ 180x600 Y
3 o
g -h·r·---------------------------- -l g
I-- --,;- r-----------------~J--{
II"
12 12 4)
O.65~
Since the section is symmetrical, Ytop= Ybot= 450 mm
6
9m ----~I·-----9m----~·1
- _1_ -- 2.46x10
Z bol- _
-
54 •7 X 10 6 mm 3
Ybo/ 450
i = 1382.4xI000 1382.4xI000x307.8 =-13.14N Imm 2
pce 258000 54.7 x 106
It should be clear that the absolute value offpce is used. Hence, it is given by:
2
/pce=13.14 Nlmm
o
o BeamC.G. !cd is the unfactored concrete stress under dead load moment only.
\0
Wd =6.45+2=8.45 kNlm'
2
Aps=1280 mm
Rd=Wd V2=76.05 kN
150 The dead load moment at the critical section equals:
T /-500-1
Md = Rd ·x c - d _·X-,C,-2.=
W_.::..
2 2
2
76.05xO.70- 8.45xO.70 = 51.2 kN.m
6
Mcr =!':"'(0.45.JJ: +ipce-icd) f. = Md = 51.2x10 = 0.93N Imm 2
Yb cd Zbol 54.7 x 106
wherefpce is the compressive stresses at the extreme fibers (bottom in this case)
due to the prestressing steel only. Noting that ZboFl/Yh thus
=~= 70.135xlOOO =0.514 Nlmm 2 /pee represents the stress at the C.G. of the section after losses. At the C.G. only
qd bxd p 180x757.8 normal stress exists as shown the in figure. -
R = wu xL = 47.03x18 =423.27 kN
u 2 2
The factored shear Qu at the critical section equals:
Qu =Ru -wu 'xx =423.27-47.03(0.70)=390.35 kN
The factored moment Mu at the critical section equals:
2 2
M =R .X - Wu ,xe = 423.7xO.7- 47.03xO.70 =284.8 kN.m
u u e 2 2
Mmax =Mu -Md =284.8-51.2=233.6 kN.m Since 8 is small we can assume that sin 8= tan 8.
723 724
r - - - -_ _ _ _ ·li;?":~:'.f
~ 0.25 fleu
I The required spacing is given by:
2
Sincehcc=5.36 N/mm and 0.25Ji: =1.48, the previous equation gives:
s = As, xl y 11.15 = 157x360/1.15 = 172 mm Use <1>10 @166 mm (6<I>1O/m')
b xqsu 180x1.59
5.36)
qcw =1.48 ( - - +1
1.48
A . =0.4bxs=0.4x180X166=33.3mm2<Asi(157) ... .o.k
There is about 25% difference in the value of the web-cracking shear strength sl.nun Iy 360
determined from both methods. We shall take the conservative value of qcw = It is clear form the previous two examples that the simplified method is very
2.54N/mm2.
conservative. The shear strength calculated using the detailed method (2.54
Step 3: Calculate qcu N/mm2) is about 40 percent more than the simplified procedure (1.81 N/mm\ '\
=~ = 390.35 = 2.86 N I mm 2
qu b dp 180x757.8
"
725 726
9.3 Torsion in Prestressed Concrete
9.3.2 The Design for TCZ-5iui1 in the Egyptian Code
9.3.1 General
When subjected to torsion, a cracked prestressed concrete beam as the one
9.3.2.1 Introduction
shown in Fig. (9.lOa) can be idealized as shown in Fig. (9.10b). The cracked The ECP 203 torsion design procedure for prestressed beams is based on the
beam resists the applied torsional moment through acting as a space-truss as space truss model with some simplifications. The assumptions are the same as
shown in Fig. 9.10. The space truss consists of: those for ordinary reinforced concrete with minor modifications and can be
• Longitudinal reinforcement concentrated at the comers. summarized in the following:
• Closed stirrups • The angle of inclination of the compression diagonals (which is the
• Diagonal concrete compression members between the cracks which angle of inclination of the cracks) is set equal to:
spiral around the beam. 45° for cases in which f pe S 40% of f pu
The angle of the inclination of the compression diagonals with respect to the
37.5° for cases in which fpc > 40% of f
beam axis, e, depends on the ratio of the force carried by the longitudinal
pu
reinforcement to that carried by the stirrups and also on the value of the • The thickness of the walls of the truss model, te , and the area
prestressing force. enclosed by the shear flow, Ao, are calculated using the expressions
given in the ECP 203.
• A limiting value for the allowed shear stresses developed due to
torsion is given to ensure prevention of crushing failure of concrete
in the struts.
In the ECP 203 torsion design procedure, the following three strength criteria
are considered:
• First, a limitation on the shear stress developed due torsion is
established such that the stirrups and the longitudinal
reinforcement will yield before the crushing of the concrete
struts.
• Second, closed stirrups are provided to resist the applied
torsional moment.
• Third, the longitudinal steel distributed around the perimeter of
the stirrups should be adequate to resist the longitudinal force
due to torsion.
..
728
727
9.3.2.2 Calculation of the Shear Stress due to Torsion 9.3.2~3 Consideration of Torsion
The ECP 203 adopts a thin-walled section analysis, to predict the shear stress According to the Egyptian code ECP 203, torsional moments should be
due to torsion in hollow as well as in solid sections. considered in design if the factored torsional stresses calculated from Eq. 9.20
The ultimate shear stress developed due to the ultimate torque M tu is given by: exceed qlumin' given by:
=
M,u . ................................................ (9.20)
q/u
. =0.06/,CU 1+ (9.23)
2Ao t. q fpcc .............................
tu mm Yc 0.25 .J.J::
For simplicity, the following expressions are suggested by the code to compute
the area enclosed by the shear flow path, Ao, and the equivalent thickness of the
Wherehcc is the average normal stress at the e.G.. of the sectIOn ifpcc
. =A
p. ).
shear flow zone, te:
The previous equation is similar to that of ordinary reinforced concrete except
Ao =0.85Aoh .............................................. (9.21)
for the magnification fa~tor ~1 +f pee /0.25.J.J:: that presents the added
te = Aoh/ Ph ............................................. (9.22)
concrete strength due to prestressing as shown in Fig. 9.12.
where
Aoh is the gross area bounded by the centerline of the outer closed stirrups. 4.5 -------_ ...
Ph is the perimeter of the stirrups.
4.0
The area Aoh is shown in Fig. 9.11 for cross-sections of various shapes.
2
For hollow sections, the actual thickness of the walls of the section should be 3.5
used if it is less than te . b;
trl
C"J 3.0
0
~
'-.,'" 2.5
+
.-<
2.0 !
1.5
1.0
0.0 -1-------1-----+----1-----+---------1
o 5 10 15 20 25
2
hcc(N/mm )
Fig. 9.11 Definition of AOh Fig. 9.12 Magnification factor according to the applied
. prestressing stress and concrete strength
729 730
9.3.2.4 Check the Adequacy of the Concrete Section
The concrete compression diagonals carry the diagonal forces necessary for the
equilibrium of the space-truss model. Preventing crushing failure of the
compression diagonals can be achieved either by limiting the compressive
1
1
!i
B-Longitudinal Reinforcement
The area of longitudinal reinforcement required for torsion Asl is given by:
stresses in the concrete struts or by limiting the maximum shear stress. The·ECP !
203 limits the shear stress calcutated by Eq. 9.20 to the value given by: AsI = M tu IPh cot. 2 () ............. .<............................. (9 .27)
2A ..L
o Y
qlumax = 0.75 f,cu ::; 4.5 N Imm 2 ..................... (9.24) s
Yc Substituting the value of M/u from Eq. 9.25, the ar«a of the longitudinal
reinforcement can be expressed in temis of A str as follows:
If qu > qtu,l1l11X, the concrete dimensions of the cross-section must be increased.
A Mlu's 0.40jf-Acp
sir = 2 Ao (fYSI ) cot e ................................... (9.25)
AsImill = r..c - (Aslr) Ph (IYSI) ................... (9.29)
Ys ,." Iy / Ys . S Iy
where Acp is the area enclosed by outside perimeter of the section including
In case of rectangular sections, Eq. 9.25 takes the form:
area of openings.
where Xl and Yl are the shorter and the longer center-to-center dimensions of
closed stirrups. The angle e is taken as The Egyptian Code sets the following requirements with respect to the
arrangements and the detailing of reinforcement for torsion as follows:
for cases in which f pe
::; 40% 01 f pu
1- Stirrups must be closely spaced with maximum spacing (s) such
• 37.5° for cases in which f pe
> 40% 01 f pu that:
731
..
732
'2- Only the outer two legs are utilized for torsion plus shear, and
the interior legs are utilized for vertical shear only.
"" ..
' ,"' ". 7- The spacing of the longitudinal bars should not exceed 300 mm
and they should be uniformly distributed along the perimeter as
shown in Fig. 9.13. At least one bar must be placed in each
corner of the section (Le. in each corner of stirrup). The
- - - - - - - - - - I-- minimum bar diameter shall be 12 mm or 1115 of the spacing
between stirrups whichever is larger.
~ ~ 4.5 N / mm
. qtumax = 0.75
VY: 2
Step 6: Design longitudinal reinforcement 9.4.2 Design for Shear and Torsion in ECP 203
P
Where! pcc =_e
A
In the previous equation ASIr should not be less than __b_
s 6xlyst
736
735
9.4.2.2 Adequacy of the Concrete Cross-Section 9.4.2.3 Design of Transverse Reinforcement
The shear stresses qu due to direct shear and shear stress qtu due to torsional For prestressed members under combined she~r and torsion, the Egyptian Code
moment are given by: requires adding the transverse steel due to torslOn to that due to shear. Concrete
is assumed to contribute to the shear strength of the beal1J.. It does not, however,
M tu contribute to the torsional strength of the beam. The transverse reinforcement
qtu = 2A t
v e for combined shear and torsion is obtained according to Table 9.1 ..
The Egyptian Code concentrates on the side of the hollow section where the Table 9.1: Transverse reinforcement requirements according to ECP 203
shear and torsional stresses are additive. On that side:
In Table (9.1), qcu is the concrete contribution to the shear strength and is
obtained from either
Ii
3.6xQu xd p
q = 0.045 ~ + > 0.24'\f} cu t Yc
cu Yc Mu
'5, 0.375~fcu / Yc
i
11 (IC
2. qcw =0.24 ..jfcu +fpcc +qpv )
The total amount of stirrups needed for shear and torsion should satisfy the
following equation:
Photo 9.5 Beam failure due to combined shear and torsion
738
737
0.40 b S
2A str +Asl) nUll. ~
f
YS1
..................................... (9.33) Design Summary for Combined Shear and Torsion
Step 1: Determine cross-sectional parameters
9.4.2.4 Design of Longitudinal Reinforcement. The cross-sectional parameters for combined shear and torsion design are b, dp ,
The longitudinal steel is not required for shear H . . Aoh and, Ph'
torsion should be obt . . d . E . . owever, 10ngItudmai steel for
aIne usmg q. 9.34.
Step 2: Calculate the ultimate shear stresses due to Qu and Mt
Asl = Astr (:h )(ff
.
y
yst
) coe e ;....................................... (9.34)
.
Qu
qu=-;;-;J
p
Note: If the actual thickness of the wall of the hollow section is less than
Aohl Ph ' then the actual wall thickness should be used. dp is should not be less
0.8 t.
Step 3: Check the need for considering torsion
Calculate the minimum shear stress below which torsion can be neglected.
O
qtu min =.
.
06 ~f- ~
Yc
1
+
fpcc
~
0.25 ..Jfcu
If qtu ) qtu min' one has to consider the shear stresses due to torsion
Yc
For solid sections
• The detailed procedure, where qcu is taken as the smaller of the flexural
I.
• • • •
shear strength and the web shear strength.
A . = 0.40 fr:-
fl: -
Acp ( A slr ) Ph (I J2!!...
A = qsu b S s/mm 1 Iys
y
s 1Y
sl fysi/Ys
The area of one branch of stirrups needed for torsion is obtained from:
In the previous equation Astr should not be less than b
A= M IU S
s 6x Iyst
sir 1. 7Aoh ifYSI / y) cot e
The area of one branch of stirrups needed for resisting shear and torsion =
A"I
Aslr+-
n
where n is the number of branches determined from shear calculations as shown
in Fig. 9.16.
741 742
Example 9.3: Combined shear and torsion design (1) Solution
Step 1: Calculate section properties
The cross section of a simply supported prestressed beam is shown in Fig. Ex
. 9 . 3. The beam is subjected to a factored shear force of 510 kN, a factored To design a T-section for torsion, one has two options:
bending moment of 80 kN.m, and a factored torsional moment of 34kN.m at 1- Consider the slab in the calculations and reinforce both the slab and the .
the critical section. Design the required reinforcement to resist the applied shear beam for torsion.
--=
and torsion. The material properties are hu=1860 N/mm2 for normal stress
2- Do not consider the slab contribution in torsion design, and provide stirrups
relieved strands, he = 960 N/mm2, h =360 N/mm2, hst =360 N/mm2 and fcu=40
2 and longitudinal reinforcement in the web only (easier and more practical
N/mm •
for thin slabs).
In this example, the contribution of the slab is considered in the calculations.
1000mm
1 1 -.
1 0-------1.
.
Note that the flanges must be less than 3 ts as shown in the figure below.
(,=250mm I
T
250mm
g
00
<3ts
350 350
50mm2
• 100 Assume concrete cover of 40 mm to the centerline of the stirrup.
920
L I .. .I
Beam cross section 170
§
Critical
section
1 0
C'l
r-
AOh definition
Qu=51OkN
Ph = 2x (720 + 920) = 3280 mm
M u=80kN.m
M/u=34 kN.m AOh =220x550+170x920 = 277400mm 2
Ao =0.85Aoh =0.85 x 277400 =235790 mm2
Straining actions at the critical section
t = AOh = 277400 84.6 mm
e Ph 3280
Fig. Ex. 9.3
A = 1000x250+300x550 = 415000 mm 2
744
743
Step 2: Calculate the ultimate shear stresses due to Qu and Mt
1. Shear stress:
The depth of the prestressing steel at the critical section equals
The maximum shear strength qumllX is given by:
d p =800-100 = 700mm
qumax :::; 0.75 Jfcu =0.75 {40 =3.87 Nlmm 2 :::;4.5N Imm 2
dp =700 mm > 0.8 t ... o.k Yc Vu -
Only the web width is effective in resisting shear force, thus b is taken as 300 qu.max = 3.87 N I mm 2
mm.
Qu 51Ox1000
q =--= =2.429 N Imm 2
u b dp 300x700
2. Torsional stresses
6
Since . ~(qu)2 + (q/u)2 ~ qumax' the concrete dimensions of th~ section are
_M/u 34x10 _ 2
q/u - 2xAo xte = 2x235700x84.6 -0.852N Imm adequate as shown in the graphical representation below.
2.429
- Pe _ 816000 2
\qu,max == 0.75 .J40/1.5 = 3.87
f pee - A- 415000 = 1.97 N I mm
Step 4: Check that section size is adequate Step 5.1: Verify the use of the simplified method
Since the effective prestressing stress he is greater than 40% of the ultimate
For solid sections, the developed shear stresses due to combined shear and tendon strength hu (960 > 0.40 x 1860=744 N/mm2 ), the code simplified
torsion should stratify the following equation: expression can be used. To use the simplified equation for evaluating concrete
shear strength, the term Qu dlMu equals:
745 746
1
.!.'
:1
1':
~1!
~li Q xd
u p 51Ox(7001l000) step 6.3: Stirrups for combined shear and torsion
---'- = = 4046 > 1.0
i! Mu SO A: Web
I
:'1
I
I
use
Quxd
Mu
p = 1.0
Area of' one branch for combined shear and torsion
= Astr + Asr/2= 23.03 + 69.97 = 93 mm2
Choose $ 12 mm (113 mm2)
1. qcu,min = 0.24Jlcu = 0.24 {40 = 1.24 N Imm 2
Yc V'LS Ast,null
. =. 0040
Iy bxs = 0040
360
300xlOO=33.3mm2
.
2. qcu,max = 0.375 Jlcu = 0.375 (40 = 1.94 N I mm 2 Tota/area chosen = 2 x 113 > As/,mill .......o.k
Yc V'LS Final design use <I> 12/100 mm
B: Flanges
qcu =0.045Jlcu +3.6X(Qu Xd p ) The flanges only resists torsion thus the area of one branch=Astr
Yc Mu
Astr = 23.03 mm2
qcu = 0.045~+3.6X1.0 = 3.S3 N Imm 2
> qcu,min(l.24) .... o.k use <I> 811 00 mm
6
A = . M IU Xs 34x10 x 100 = 23.03mm2
sir 2XAo xl ysl I Ys cot 8 2x235790x360/1.15 cot 45°
747 748
-
Example 9.4: Combined shear and torsion design (Box-
0.40 (40 x415000 section)
As/,min = 'V360/1.15
1.5 23.03X3280(360)
100 360 = 1983 mm 2
Figure Ex. 9.4 shows a box section that conl'ltitutes the cross-section of the
girder of a road-way bridge. Structural analysis of the bridge revealed that the
critical section of the girder near the support is l'lubject to the following
Since Asl < As1,min ... use Asl,min straining actions:
I[ ] At this section the girder has been post-tensioned with 32 tendons arranged
2
ducts 60 mm diameter. The total prestressing steel Aps = 17120 mm . The low-
2
in 8
relaxation strand1'i have fpu = 1860 N/mm2 and/pe =1080 N/mm • It is required to
, ~ 1401>14
carry out a design for the combined shear and torsion for that section. The
material properties are as follows:
V feu= 40 N/mm2 and h = 400 N/mm2
\.
14000mm
.\
Torsional reinforcement details
-f------.. _----1-----..
••
------.. .
350
<D 8/100 mm
('----J ..
Torsion only stirrup ! 700 350
700
<D 12/100 mm
I I- 7000 ·1
Shear + torsion l'ltirrup
.. Fig. EX. 9.4 Cross section of the road-way bridge
Stirrup detail
749 750
Solution 2. Torsional Stresses
Step 1: Calculate section properties The torsional stresses in the webs equal:
Assume a clear concrete cover of 40. mm and the diameter of the bars used is 22 M tu 6
320.0.0. x 10. = 0..94 N I mm 2
mm as illustrated in the figure shown below qtu(web) = 2xA xt 2 x (0..85 X 2861290.4) X 70.0.
o e
AOh = [4250.- 2x(4o.+ 11) ]X[7o.o.o.- 2x(4o.+ 11)]
The top flange is more critical because its thickness is smaller than the bottom
=4148x6898= 2861290.4 mm 2
one. Thus the torsion stress in the slab (flange) equals:
Ph =2X(4148+6898}=22o.92mm 6
M tu 320.0.0. x 10. =2.23N Imm 2
te = AOh = 2861290.4 = 1295.1mm
qtu(flange) = 2xA() xte 2x(o..85x 286129o.4)x35o.
Ph 220.92
Since the effective thickness (te ) is less than both the web thickness (70.0. mm) Step 3: Check the need for considering torsion
and the flange thickness (350. mm), use the actual thickness.
The value of qtu,m;1I equals:
Use te=tactual=35o. mm for flanges
Use te=tactual=7o.o. mm for webs q . = 0..0.6
tu IDm
Jfyc cu 1+ [pee
0..25 .JJ:
The prestressing force Pe is obtained by multiplying the effective prestressing
stress after considering all losses he by the area of prestressing steel Aps.
Pe =f pe xAps =108o.x1712o./lOo.o. = 18489.6 kN
. • 2
It can be computed that the total concrete cross sectIOnal area Ac= 13 A m
~
6898 o. 1.38 2
qtumin =0..0.6 - 1+ r;;: =o.AN Imm
1.5 0..25....,40.
Step 2: Calculate the ultimate shear stresses due to Qu and Mt
Since qtu > qtumin' we have to consider the shear stresses due to torsion.
1. Shear Stress:
The applied vertical shear force is resisted by the internal shear stresses
developed in each web. From the figure one gets:
751 752
TI
Step 4: Check that section size is adequate Step 5: Calculate concrete shear strength qcu
The maximum shear strength qU1lUJX is given by: 1 To simplify the calculation of qcu, the simplified method is used. However,
j verification needs to be made as shown in step 5.1. I
q ::::: 0.75 Jf cu =0.75 [40 =3.87 N Imm 2 :::::4.5 N Imm 2 i1 -
. umax yc V15 i Step 5.1: Verify the use of the simplified method
;1
Since the effective prestressing stress he is greater than 40% of the ultimate r,
For the flanges (top or bottom flanges) tendon strength hu (1080 > 0.40 x 1860=744 N/mm2 ), the code simplified
Since qtu(f1ange) = 2.23 N I mm 2 < qu,lnax, the flange thickness is adequate. expression can be used To use the simplified equation for evaluating concrete
shear strength, the term Qu dlMu equals:
For the webs Qu xd p = 13000 x (3600/1000) = 0.77 < 1.0 .... .ok
For hollow sections, the developed shear stresses due to combined shear and Mu 60200
torsion should stratify the following equation:
• qcu.min = 0.24Jfcu = 0.24 [40 = 1.24 N I mm 2
yc V15
2
qu + qtu ::; qumax qu + qtu =0.94+2.23=3.17 N Imm
• qcu,max =0.375~fcu =0.375 (40 =1.94N Imm 2
Since , the concrete dimensions of the section are adequate as shown in the yc V15
graphical representation below.
p
qcu =0.045Jf;: + 3.6 x (Q:ud )
qtu,max=3.87 . [40 .. 2
qcu = 0.045 +3.6xO.77 = 3.51 N Imm > qcu,min(l.24) .... o.k
V15
Since qcu > qcu,max use qcu = qcu,max
0.75 ../40/1.5 = 3.87 Step 6: Design of stirrups for shear and torsion
753 754
Step 6.2: Area of stirrups for torsion
Since/pe (1080 N/mm2) is greater than 0.40/pu, use 8=45. Step 7 Design of longitudinal reinforcement for torsion
Using s of 100 mm, the area of one branch Astr , one gets:
A
sl
= A slr XPh (/ys,
sly
Jcoe B = 18if.1x10022092 (400)coe
400_
45 = 41784.mm 2
6
A == M,uxs 32000 x 10 x 100 ==189.1mm 2
sIr 2xAo xi ySI / Ys cot B 2x(0.85x28612904)x400/1.15 cot 45° Calculate the minimum area for longitudinal reinforcement As1,min
For box sections, the code permits the use of reinforcement along the interior
and exterior sides of each web if the wall thickness tw is less or equal to the
section width/6 .
.: t (700) < ~ < 7000
W 6 6 . A b
There is a condition on this equation that ~ ~ - - -
The area of the stirrups for torsion can be divided on the two sides S 6xlysl
Area of one branch A str =189.112 =94.55 mm2
189 7000 b
- < thus use - - -
Step 6.3: Stirrups for combined shear and torsion 100 6x400 6xlys,
A: Web
2
Area of one branch for combined shear and torsion Acp =7x4.25 =29.75 m
2
= Astr + Astf2= 94.55 + 162 = 256.6 mm
Choose <I> 20 mm (314 mm2)
~
o
A str = 94.55 mm2 0.4 -x29.75x106
use <I> 12/100 mm A . = 1.5 _( 7000 )X22092X(400)=112237mm2
sl.nun 400/1.15 6x400 400
2A, +A,) . = 0.40 bxs = 0.40 (350)x100=35mm 2
sr S nun Iy 400
Since Asl < As1,min ... use As1,min
2
As,,chosen = 2x1l3 = 226 mm > 35.2 ..... .ok Choose 184 <I> 28 such that the maximum spacing between longitudinal steel is
less than 300 mm
Final design two stirrups +20/100 mm (two branches) in the webs and two
stirrups +121100 mm (two branches) in the flanges
756
755
r-
'- ~
"iii
~
£
'0
c
0
tU
~
"iii
0
c
"e
£
10
:
z tU
'?'
~
~
E
0C\I CONTINUOUS PRESTRESSED BEAMS
'§:
0
~
-
~ I
~ I W/OZ~O~
E
N
~ <0
0
~
C\I
'§: '§:
0 '<t
<0
~ ~
V
E
~ N
~
E ~
'§: '§:
N
~ 0 0
'§: ~ ... ;:;.
0
V ~
~ lL-_ _ _ _ _ _ +;-,
.- - I
J
W/OZ~O~
~
C\I
'§:
0
~
~ tU
"-
'EO C
o Photo 10.1 Sohag bridge over the River Nile
"iii
c "e
0 £
"e tU
10.1 Introduction
£ '0
tU z
'- '0 Continuity is frequently used because of the several benefits that can be
z
achieved. Continuity reduces the bending moments resulting in more
economic designs. It also permits tensioning of the tendons over several
supports with a great reduction in the number of anchorage and labor cost in
the prestressing operation. Finally, the deflection of continuous members is
'greatly reduced when compared to that of the simple span.
757
758
Continuous prestressed concrete beams are widely used in Egypt in the anchorage
construction of bridges particularly those constructed using post-tensioning
technique.
The disadvantages of continuity can be summarized in the following:
• Higher frictional losses due to the larger number of bends and longer
path. (a) Beam with constant depth
• The sections over the interior supports are subjected to combined effect Post-tensioned cable
~q
of high bending moments and high shear forces whereas the section at
mid-span of a simple beam is subjected to zero shear.
• Development of horizontal forces and moments in the supporting
columns. These forces are produced by elastic shortening of the beams.
(b) Beam with variable depth and straight
• Formation of secondary stresses due to shrinkage, creep and
temperature.
• Moment reversal may occur due to alternate loading of spans.
• Formation of secondary moment due to induced reactions at the middle
supports caused by prestressing force (to be discussed later).
759 760
10.3 Elastic Analysis of Continuous Beams
10.3.1 Effects of the Prestress
The deformation caused by prestressing in a statically determinate member is
m free to take place without any restraint from supports. In statically
-"'-- indeterminate members, however, this is not the' case. The intermediate
N.~-~~~4----;~-
supports impose additional geometric constraint which is zero deflection at the
(/) !!2 m intermediate supports. During the stressing operation, the geometric constrains
X
«)-,
x~ me:' of zero deflection at the intermediate supports cause additional reactive forces
--+4--~--~~ 0
13 to develop at the locations of the intermediate supports, which in tum change
CD
(f) the distribution and magnitude of the moments and shears in the members.
In continuous prestressed concrete beams, the moment induced by prestressing
on a particular cross-section in a statically indeterminate structure may be
considered to be made of two components:
a- The first component is the product of the prestressing force (P) and its
eccentricity from the centroidal axis (e). This is the moment that acts on
the cross-section when the geometric constraints imposed by the
intermediate supports are removed. The moment (P.e) is called the
primary moment.
e:
o
1a b- The second component is the moment caused by the reactions
a; developed at the intermediate supports. As mentioned before, such
iTI
-§ -------. reactions are required in order to achieve zero deflection at the
intermediate supports due to prestressing. This moment is called
«
-"'-- __'«" 13CD
(f) secondary moment.
Elastic analysis of continuous beams can be carried out using one of two
methods:
• Support displacement method.
• Equivalent load method.
le:
o
UCD 10.3.2 Support Displacement Method
(f)
10.3.2.1 Background
Let us consider a cantilevered beam with a roller support at the end as shown in
". Fig. lOA. If this support is removed, the beam becomes determinate and it will
deflect downward. To maintain its previous position, a force R is required. This
,....)------..JIYoI.~4_------_;.
force causes the secondary· moment. The original (primary) moment due to
~!~
prestressing equals MJO=P.e (negative in this case). The final moment any point
- w equals:
oa: -0.
761
,-
I
Mjillal =Mprimary + Msecolldary •••••••••••••••••••••..••••• (10.1)
762
BeamC.G.
To detennine the unknown reaction R, the method of consistent defonnation is
used. The unknown reaction is replaced by a unit load and the structure
becomes detenninate. The deflection ~1 due to this unit load (P =1) can be
_. __. . . . . . _.. . . . . . _. . . . . . ._. . . . _._. . . . . . . . ._. . _._. _. . __._. . . . . . _.,l
obtained by integrating the moment Mll over the span as follows: ~--r_--------------------,.-r~--p
Cable profile t
£\1 =:1 JM 11 xM 11 d x •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• (10.2) L
1-
Furthennore, for simple structures, the deflection Oll can be obtained using the
expressions given in Appendix A. For example, the deflection of a cantilever
beam with concentrated load at the end equals:
r
~.
~-,
Deflected shape
P L3 L3
---------- ------
£\1 = - - = - - ........................................ (10.3) ~--r_~------------------,.-T----p
3E I 3E I
~
~I--------~-----------,l
Removing
.Since, the deflection at the actual support should equal to zero, the unit load kN t T the support
deflection ~ 1 should be equal and opposite to the deflection caused by the
primary moment ~o. Hence, compatibility of defonnations gives:
L
= -010 ............................................... (10.5)
ROil
It should be clear that the secondary moment is added to the primary moment to
produce the final moment. Also, the value of the secondary moment is Fig. 10.4 Application of support displacement method to
dependent on the prestressing force and the tendon profile. continuous prestressed beam
763 764
Applying of the method of consistent deformation to the beam shown in Fig. P.e BeamC.G. P.e
~
10.5, results in the following expressions:
P--+---..4...._..........•....•.....•- ..•............•..•._.___............................................ ........-t----=-p )
Cable profile
1 J 1 L -P·e· L2 I
8. = - M M d =-(-P·e)·Lx-=---w
L
\0 EI II 10 x EI 2 2EI
P.e
P.e
To facilitate the calculations of the above integrals, the integrations of some
typical shapes are given in Table 10.1. Thus, R equals: Primary moment, MJO
8. -P·e·L2 /2EI
R =-....JQ. = 3
011 L /3EI
L~
Moment due to
unit force (MIl)
p·Mws==:::==-;;:/
The secondary moment at the fixed support equals:
Secondary moment, Msec
_3P·e L_ 3P . e
M sec --R X M 11-2L""X 3
--2-
2 2L
The final moment at the fixed support = Mprimary + Msecolldary
3 P·e P·e
=-P·e+--=+--
2 2
The effective eccentricity at the fixed end =+e/2 (above C.G.)
The Moment at the free end =Mprimary + Msecondary 2
=-P·e+O=-P·e BeamC.G.
e/2
The effective eccentricity at the free end =-e (below C.G.)
1
Figure 10.5 shows the primary, the secondary and the final moments for the 1 /}--,--i-----+----:...;;::..:..::...........~p
beam. The final moment can be represented by an effective cable profile or line
of pressure or C-line. The profile is obtained by dividing the final moment by
the prestressing force. I,
" L
II
Fig. 10.5 C-Iine, or pressure line, or effective cable profile
765 766
Example 10.1
The figure given below shows a post-tensioned continuous beam. The tendon
The stress distribution in a statically determinate beam is given by considering the profile is shown in figure. the effective prestressing force after losses is 1500
actual cable profile, whereas in a continuous beam, the stress distribution is obtained leN. Compute the primary, the secondary and the final moments using the
by using the effective cable profile which gives the effective eccentricity e * or the final support displacement method. Calculate the stresses at section F due to
moment due to prestressing (P e*). Hence, the stresses at the top and bottom fibers of a prestressing and self-weight knowing that thecross:.section of the beam is
section in a continuous beam can be obtained using the following equation: rectangular with dimensions 300 rom x1200 mm.
P P xe* M
f =--;(+-z-±z······························(lO.8)
where M is the applied moment at the critical section. 160 Cable profile
f
Table 10.1 Values of product integral M 11 M 10 dx
1
~M'
L
1
M,
c:t
1 L
1
2
1
~
M,
L
1
~
1 L
M,
1
M
I I.
13 L
-M, M3
2
2L (M, +M 2) M3 2L M , M3 2L M M
3 ' 3
I .I
~M3 L
L (i (M, +2M 2) M3 L L
L 3 M , M3 "4 M ,M3 -M, M3
3
1 I
M3~ L L L L
(iM, M3 (i (2M, +M 2)M 3 "4MJ M3 -M J M 3
L 3
L
(iM, (2M 3+M.)+
M3~Mt L
L
-::1M, (M, +M.)
3L M ,(M,+M 4)
M3
L L L 5L M M
"4MJ M 3 -::I M, (M, +M 2 ) -M,M3
12 '
3 3
1<'1
1----1
300
767 768
Solution 1 Cable profile
11 EI 11 11 3EL 11 11 3 EI EI A "l(iJY~
240
b- Primary moment
1 630+240/2=759. 750
l
48m
~ 240
c- Simplified primary moment
. + iiii i ii i
The displacement due to the original prestressing force can be obtained by 510
applying the method of consistent deformation. Referring to Table 10.1, the 375 d- Secondary moment 375
deflection at intermediate support equals:
769 770
R =- <\0 = -97920/ EI = 42.5-1-
Step 3: Concrete stress due to prestressing and self-weight at
<\1 2304/ EI
section f
Thus, the secondary moment at the intennediate support equals:
The effective eccentricity e* at section F equals:
Msee = RxM II = 42.5x12 = 51OkN.m e* = eab = 250 mm
A=300xI200=360000 mm 2
Step 2: Calculate final moment and effective eccentricity
The final moment (due to prestressing) at the intennediate support is given by: = 25 x 360000 = 9 kN / m'
wow 10 6
Mb +Msec = 240+51O=}50kN .m The maximum positive bending for a continuous beam with two equal spans
The effective eccentricity at the intennediate support equals: and equal loading can be obtained as follows:
2 2
_ w ow xL =9X24 =471kN.m
eb -- 750x1000 -_ 500 mm i Mow - 11 11
1500
2 2
The midspan final moment =primary moment _ M sec Zbot
=
Ztop
= bxt = 300x1200 = 72xl0 6 mm 3
6 6
2
The stresses at bottom and top fibers due to prestressing and self-weight equal:
= -630+ 510 = -375 kN.m
2 P P xe* Mow
The effective eccentricity at mid-span equals: J; =-~---+-
bot A Zbot Zbot
- -375x1000 _ 250 I 6
e ab - - mm-¥ 1500x1000 1500x1000x250 + 471.27x10 = -2.83 N / mm 2
1500 6
360000 I 72x10 72xl06
P Pxe* _ Mow
flOp =--A + Z Z
500 top bot
C-Iine (pressure line)
6
1500 x 1000 + 1500 x 1000 x 250 471.27x10 = -5.5 N / mm 2
hop = 360000 72xl0 6 72xl0 6
771
772
Example 10.2 Solution
A continuous pretensioned beam'with two equal spans of 16.0m each is shown
in the figure below. It is required to compute the primary, the secondary and
Step 1: Calculate section properties
2
the final moments using the support displacement method. The effective A= 2x600xlS0+600x200 = 300000 mm
prestressing force after losses can be estimated as 1800 kN. Calculate the
stresses at the section F due to additional live loads of 32 kN/m'. Since the section is symmetrical; Ytop = Ybottom= 4S0 mm
3 3
4
1= 2X(600XlS0 + 600XlS0X(4S0-7S)2)+ 200x600 = 2.92S X1010 mm
,12 12
IF 200 rom Cable profile
I 2.92S X 1010 6S X 106 mm 3
Zbol =-- ----=
Y bottom 4S0
6 3
Ztop= Zbot= 6Sx10 mm
a c Wo,w = r xA = 2Sx 300000 = 7.SkN 1m'
8m 8m 8m c 1000000
L 1-,L'600 ---i M
11
= PxL
4
lx(16+16) =8 kN.m
4
I I
T
ISO The displacement at the middle support ~h 1 due to the unit force equals:
1T L..-., 1 L 32
011 =-fMllMlId =--M 11 xM lI =--x8x8=
EI x 3EI 3 EI
682.667
E I
J,.
8 200- I- o
\0 o
0\
1 kN
II I
T
ISO •
!- 600 ---i
I 1 A-
I-
1
32m
A
~ I
Beam cross section
~~
Mll=8 kN.m
Bending Moment due to a unit force
773 774
280 200 Cable profile The displacement due to the primary moment (prestressing force) equals:
I 8m I 8m 1
8m
1
8m
I
The condition at the support is given by R 8 11 + 810 =0
a- Cable profile -61441 EI = 9 J..
682.6671 EI
Thus, the secondary moment at the intermediate support equals:
Msec = RxM ll =9x8 = 72kN.m
360
b- Primary moment Step 3: Calculate final moment and effective eccentricity
684 468 The final moment (due to prestressing) at the intermediate support is given by:
~~A
M b + M sec = 360 + 72 = 432 kN ,m
The effective eccentricity at intermediate support equals:
360 - 432xlOOO _ 240 t
c- Simplified primary moment eb - 1800 - mm
e = -468xlOOO = 260 mm J,
ab 1800
~ ~A
~
2
The effective eccentricity at the midspan of the right span equals:
A _-252XlOOO_ J,
ebc - 1800 - 140 mm
432 /
e- Final moment
775 776
C-line (pressure line) 10.3.3 Equivalent Load Method
240
The equivalent load method is another approach for computing the secondary
and the final moments. In this method, the prestressing force is replaced by an
equivalent load produced by the primary moments. Solving the continuous
beam under the effect of the equivalent loads gives the final moments directly.
The secondary moments are obtained by subtracting'the final moment from the
primary moments as follows:
I·
8m
,I· 8m
·1·
8m
·1 ~
8m
·1 M Secondary = M final - M Primtvy ............................ (10.9)
Effective cable profile (C-line) The method of moment distribution is usually used to calculate the
indeterminate moments at the supports. The equivalent loads can be computed
for both linear and curved tendons. The equivalent loads for straight tendon
Step 3: Concrete stress due to service loads at section F profiles are concentrated forces while those for parabolic tendon profile are
,
uniform loads.
The effective eccentricity e* at section F equals:
e * = eab = 260 mm A-Straight Tendon Profile
The total weight Wtot equals: The horizontal and the vertical components of the tendon forces shown in Fig.
10.6 can be expressed as functions of the cable slope angle as follows:
Wtot =wow +(W DL +w LL )=7.5+32=39.5kN 1m'
H =P cos 8 V =P sin 8
The maximum positive bending for a continuous beam with two equal spans For small angles, it can be assumed that cos 9=1 and sin 9 =9. Thus,
and equal loading is given as:
ftop =-12.94 Nlmm2 H =P V =P 8
2
W XL2
M = --!!to"-.t-- 39.5x16 = 919.27 kN.m At points D and D' where the tendon changes direction, a summation of forces
11 11 indicates the existence of an upward force in the vertical direction. The changes
in tendon slope at points D and D "equal:
P P xe* M
t =-----+-
bot A Zbot Zbol
ihottom=+O.94
6
1800 x 1000 1800 x 1000 x 260
floP = - - - - - + - - - - - :6- - - 919.27x10
6
= -12.94 N Imm 2
300000 65 x 10 65xl0
~----------------.-----------------------------~ "'.
777 778
The equivalent concentrated loads VPJ and Vn are given by:
-l -
Vpi = p ·/10 = p (e +e?
-+e z-
+e-
3 j
...................... (10.11)
. ~ L-~
,
Vpz =p·/1o:=P (e +e.
-3 _ 4
+-, - s)
e 4 -e ..................... (10.12)
Xz L -Xz
The equivalent concentrated loads can also be obtained by equating the moment
X2 L'-X2
due to prestressing force to the moment caused by the equivalent concentrated
·1
loads as follows:
H01 V
P
2 xz(L'-xz):=Pe 2
L' C
............................ (10.13b)
Fig. 10.6 Calculation of the equivalent loads for straight cable profile
Photo 10.2 Prestressed concrete box section
780
779
B-Curved Tendon Profile It should be noted that for eccentric cables, the eccentricity em is measured at
mid-span from the cable to the line connecting the two ends as shown in Fig.
The equivalent load caused by a curved tendon configuration can be established
10.8.
by considering a simple beam with parabolic tendon profile. The bending
moment at any point due to this prestressing force is given by (MJ=P.e). If we
e'i-~::::tL~~'
assume an equivalent uniform upward load Weq acting on the beam as shown in
Fig. 10.7, the maximum moment at mid-span equals:
~e3~
Weq XL2
M2 = ............................................. (10.14)
8
Since the equation of the bending moment for uniformly loaded simply
supported beam is also parabolic, the moments must be equal in the two beams
I· L ------I-
Weq xL
2
,l2 t ttl I-I t f f tit I I 1ft t t f tll
p·e m = ......................-.................... (10.16)
8
Fig. 10.8 Determination of em for cable with eccentricity el and e2
8 P·e
Weq = 2 m •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• (10.17)
L
where em is the mid-span deflection.
I· L .\
12 II I I I I I I I I I t II II tit t t;!1.
Weq
Fig. 10.7 Calculation of the equivalent load for curved tendons Photo 10.3 Continuous prestressed box-girder bridge
781 782
Example 10.3 Solution
A continuous prestressed beam having a rectangular cross-section (250 nun
xllOO mm) is shown in the figure below. Also .shown is the cable profile. The Step 1: Calculate the secondary moment at b
span a-b has linear cables while span B-C has a parabolic curve. Locate the line
of pressure. Calculate the final stresses at support b due to the prestressing as The equivalent concentrated load acting on the beam equals:
well as a uniformly distributed load of 15 kN/m' . (Pe=1200 kN)
V p --P X «() + () )-1200 x (0.4-0.12
1 2 - 12 8 -118 leN t
+ 0.4+0.2):....
+l~---- ----~i0z;=;:--r~-~
Using Eq. 10.13: P L -P eml
H 250
*
0.12 -=----------A----------- er
~c-~--e-; ,; ,; ;,I- ; ; . ;. - e-~,~;-f-Tlt>(1!---,e,..;T--,.......;::.......:·:c:::::::::::~-~---~.....;---;.;.:.---;;.-;.;.--,;;,,;;,;;---~
0.4 tT 0.45
Beam cross section I. 12 ., ' 8 .,. 20 ~ ,
", 784
783
em] 400 200 Cable profile em2 The beam is once statically indetenninate. We shall use the three-moment
___;:z0-
_ _ --+-1%0-1---
equation to calculate the moment at.the middle support.
, 12m /. 8m .,. 10m ./. 10m .1 The elastic reaction Rbc due to unifonn load is given by:
a- Cable profile __ Weq X L3 -13.2x203 2
540 R -----'-- = = -4400 kN.m
be 24 24
480 ~
1~·~ The elastic reaction Rab due to concentrated load not in the middle is given by
R _ Pxaxb (L+a)
'<QJY
240
ab - 6L
-118x8xI2x(20+12) =-3020.8 kN.m 2
6x20
b- Primary moment The reader should be aware that the negative sign is due to upward force
direction.
Ma=l44
weq=13.2 kNlm' P=-118kN
£"'" t, 11111111 t II t 11 t
c- Equivalent loading
a=12 . I 8 Al - Rab
268.46 363.72
Il-t-:===~.:~-L=_-=20=·~·'==:=::
144~rr:"";',,-'----:--]I'1A ~
-144x20+ 2M b(20+20)+0 = -6 (-4400-3020.8)
Mb= +592.56 kN.m (positive bending)
592.56
d- Final moment Step 2: Calculate the C-line
The secondary moment at the support (b) equals:
iii I
+ + Msecondary = Mfinal -Mprimary=592.56-240 =352.56 kN.m
11111111
352.56 Thus, the eccentricity of C-line at the support (b) equals:
e-Secondary moment
e = M b = 592.56 = 0.494 m
b
t
p. 1200
Primary, secondary and final moments The negative bending at the cable broken point of beam a-b equals:
",
785 786
12 Step 3: Concrete stress due to prestressing at support (b)
Mab,final =Mab,primary + Mab,secondary = - 480 + 352.56 x 20 == -268.46 kN .m
The effective eccentricity e* equals:
Thus, the eccentricity of C-line at the cable broken point of beam a-b equals: e * = eb = 0.494 m
. _ M ab _ - 268 .64 - 0 224 ,l- A = 250xllOO = 275000 mm 2
e ab - -P- - 1200 -. m
Thus, the eccel:1tricity of C-line at mid-span of span b-c equals: wow =25xO.25xl.l=6.875kN 1m'
P Pxe* M
fbollom =- A +-Z---Z-
bOI lop
Effective cable.profile or C-line
1200 x~OOO + 1200 xlOOOx494 1093.8x106 =-14.30 N Imm2
fbOltOm = 275000 50.416 X 106 50.41 X 106
787 788
P=1200kN \
10.4 Linear Transformation and Concordant Profiles
Cable profile (2) Cable profile (1)
If the original cable profile was selected as the effective cable profile, the
secondary moment will be equal to zero and the final moment will be equal to
the primary moment. This is called a concordant profile.
The concordant profile induces no reactions due to the prestressing at the
intermediate supports (secondary moment =
0). The choice of a concordant
profile or a non-concordant profile is governed by the concrete cover. In
addition, any tendon profile can be linearly transformed without affecting the
12m 8m 10m 10m
C-line position.
When the position of a cable is moved over the interior supports without
\. .\. .\ \. .\
changing the curvature and the shape of the cable within each individual span, a- Cable profiles (1),(2)
the line is said to be linearly transformed. It is possible to linearly transform any
pressure line by rising or lowering the eccentricity at the interior support
without altering the exterior eccentricity. The resulting effective cable profile is Moment diagram 1
the same in both cases. However, the amount of the secondary moment and the
induced reactions at the middle support is different for each profile, but the sum
of the primary and the secondary moment is the same. For example the beam
shown in Fig. 10.9 has two tendon profiles, each produce different primary
, + //
moment. However, the equivalent loads and hence the final moments in both , /
cases are the same. . '/240
Moment dIagram 2 / " y /
em1 = (400 -120) + (120+ 200)x12/20 = 472 mm b- Primary moment due to prestressing
. 0.2
e m2 = 0.45 + - = 0.55 m
2
For the cable profile 2 Ma=144 Vp=llS
w eq=13.2 kN/m'
e~l = (2S0-120) + (120 + 400)x12/20 = 472 mm
(~~______~t____~*~I~"~II~I~lI~II~I~11~11~1~11~11~1L
<2 = 0.35 + 0.42 = 0.55 m
For both profiles c- Equivalenfloading for both moment diagrams
789 790
APPENDIX A
II> Weight Cross sectional area (cm') II> Weight Cross sectional area (mm')
mm kg/m' 1 2 mm kg/m' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 • 8 9 10 11 12
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
6 0.222 0.28 0.57 0.85 1.13 1.41 1.70 1.98 2.26 6 0.222 28.3 56.5 84.8 113 141 170 198 226 254 283 311 339
2.54 2.83 3.11 3.39
8 0.395 0.50 1.01 1.51 2.01 2.51 3.02 3.52 4.02 8 0.395 50.3 101 151 201 251 302 352 402 452 503 553 603
4.52 5.03 5.53 6.03
10 0.617 0.79 1.57 2.36 3.14 3.93 4.71 5.50 6.28 ·7.07 7.85 8.64 9.42 10 0.617 78.5 157 236 314 393 471 550 628 707 785 864 .Jl42
1018 1131. _1244 1357
12
14
0.888
1.208
1.13
1.54
2.26
3.08
3.39
4.62
4.52
6.16
5.65
7.70
6.79 7.92 9.05 10.18 11.31 12.44 13.57
9.24 10.78 12.32 13.85 15.39 16.93 18.47.
12
14
0.888
1.208
113
154
226
308
339
462
452
616
565
770'
679
924
792 905
1078 1232 .1385 1539 1693 1847
-.
---
16 1.578 2.01 4.02 6.03 8.04 10.05 12.06 14.07 16.08 18.10 20.11 22.12 24.13 16 1.578 201 402 603 804 1005 1206 1407 1608 .1810 2011 -2212 "2413
18 1.998 2.54 5.09 7.63 10.18 12.72 15.27 17.81 20.36 22.90 25.45 27.99 30.54 18 1.998 254 509 763 1018 1272 1527 1781 2036 2290 2545 2799 3054
20 2.466 3.14 6.28 9.42 12.57 15.71 18.85 21.99 25.13 28.27 31.42 34.56 37.70 20 2.466 314 628 942 1257 1571 1885 2199 2513 2827 3142 3456 3770
22 2.984 3.80 7.60 11.40 15.21 19.01 22.81 26.61 30.41 34.21 38.01 41.81 45.62 22 2.984 380 760 1140 1521 1901 2281 2661 3041 3421 3801 4181 4562
25 3.853 4.91 9.82 14.73 19.63 24.54 29.45 34.36 39.27 44.18 49.09 54.00 58.90 25 3.853 491 982 1473 1963 2454 2945 3436 3927 4418 4909 5400 5890
28 4.834 6.16 12.32 18.47 24.63 30.79 36.95 43.10 49.26 55.42 61.58 67.73 73.89 28 4.834 616 1232 1847 2463 3079 3695 4310 4926 5542 6158 6773 7389
32 6.313 8.04 16.08 24.13 32.17 40.21 48.25 56.30 64.34 72.38 80.42 88.47 96.51 32 6.313 804 1608 2413 3217 4021 4825 5630 6434 7238 8042 8847 9651
38 8.903 11.34 22.68 34.02 45.36 56.71 68.05 79.39 90.73 102.1 113.4 124.8 136.1 38 8.903 1134 2268 3402 4536 5671 6805 7939 9073 10207 11341 12475 13609
II> Weight Cross sectional area (cm') II> Weight Cross sectional area (mm')
mm kg/m' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 mm kg/m' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
6 0.222 0.28 0.57 0.85 1.13 1.41 1.70 1.98 2.26 2.54 2.83 3.11 3.39 6 0.222 28.3 56.5 84.8 113.1 141.4 170 198 226 254 283 311 339
8 0.395 0.50 1.01 1.51 2.01 2.51 3.02 3.52 4.02 4.52 5.03 5.53 6.03 8 0.395 50.3 100.5 151 201 251 302 352 402 452 503 553 603
10 0.617 0.79 1.57 2.36 3.14 3.93 4.71 5.50 6.28 7.07 7.85 8.64 9.42 10 0.617 79 157 236 314 393 471 550 628 707 785 864 942
13 1.042 1.33 2.65 3.98 5.31 6.64 7.96 9.29 10.62 11.95 13.27 14.60 15.93 13 1.042 133 265 398 531 664 796 929 1062 1195 1327 1460 1593
16 1.578 2.01 4.02 6.03 8.04 10.05 12.06 14.07 16.08 18.10 20.11 22.12 24.13 16 1.578 201 402 603 804 1005 1206 1407 1608 1810 2011 2212 2413
19 2.226 2.84 5.67 8.51 11.34 14.18 17.01 19.85 22.68 25.52 28.35 31.19 34.02 19 2.226 284 567 851 1134 1418 1701 1985 2268 2552 2835 3119 3402
22 2.984 3.80 7.60 11.40 15.21 19.01 22.81 26.61 30.41 34.21 38.01 41.81 45.62 22 2.984 380 760 1140 1521 1901 2281 2661 3041 3421 3801 4181 4562
25 3.853 4.91 9.82 14.73 19.63 24.54 29.45 34.36 39.27 44.18 49.09 54.00 58.90 25 3.853 491 982 1473 1963 2454 2945 3436 3927 4418 4909 5400 5890
28 4.834 6.16 12.32 18.47 24.63 30.79 36.95 43.10 49.26 55.42 61.58 67.73 73.89 28 4.834 616 1232 1847 2463 3q79 3695 4310 4926 5542 6158 6773 7389
32 6.313 8.04 16.08 24.13 32.17 40.21 48.25 56.30 64.34 72.38 80.42 88.47 96.5
-
..
4825 5630 6434 7238 8042 8847 9651
32 6.313 804 1608 2413 3217 ~1)21
38 8.903 11.34 22.68 34.02 45.36 56.71 68.05 79.39 90.73 102.1 113.4 124.8 136.1 38 8.903 1134 2268 3402 4536 5671 6805 ni39 9073 10207 11341 12475 13609
791 792
G>
DESIGN CHART FOR SECTIONS SUBJECTED TO SIMPLE BENDING :T
o
::J
(Table 4-1)
§.
!lO
!!l
R1 co ;l::
0.D15 0.D18 2:
0.020 0.024 0.15 ...........13 ~f9 !Y:"~~q!'l['!~:2" •... '" .•...•..•.•...••••.•..•.. .. ~ -1 ... L.. ~
0.025
0.030
0.030
0.036
~.~: "'''''' .. : ... ~ ~~~ m;' ................. '" ........... ;pT
0.035 0.042
. • .. .. •• ... '" fy:--4QP t~ult1liL ... ••• ........ ... ... ... :;2~
0.040
0.045
0.048
0.055 0.12 V .
0.050 0.061 0.11 V-
0.055 0.068
-...l r
0.060
0.065
0.074
0.081
0.10 V '. ./
..
. .
10
w L 0.070 0.088
....
0.09
L
V"
('II
1
E •
z:
I N ~
~
('II
E
~
0.075
0.080
0.095
0.102 a: 0.08 V ~ :~ gj ~
V
-. J
~t . . .., ";.
II '" U
0.085 0.109 0.07 I
o • ,
0.090 0.117 I
o
~
./
0.095 0.124 0.06 J. .: 3l
' . / II S • cO'
0.100 0.132 0.05 ,/" M ::J
0.105 0.140 RI--_u 2 a
0.110 0.148 0.04 V - feu bd ~
0.115 0.156 §-
0.03 f. P
0.120
, 0.125
0.164 R1max
0.173 Jy=400 Q~
/V A =OJ-E...bd±--"-
, ~ ~/~ i
(')
0.129 0.180 '!y"=360 0.01 g
~
0.139 0.198 fy=280
0.143 0.206 ~
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22
CJ)
f
~
o o
g1
? p .P p p !=' !=' !=' 0 000 o o o !=' g
~ o
co
~
0 M ~ en c;; ~ ks ~ ~ S5 ~ ~ ~ ~ !;l ~ §.
0.08
5'
C'l
~
<l>
'0'
"II
p
>:.
II
>:i
~
<::r'
~
.?>-
II
"~
<::r'
I:l..
.;-.; 1;-..
0.10
0.12
0.14
"" ~
38
~
•
38
1:
8' 8' 8' 8' I
0 •
_8 38
~ ~
:-""1
~.
Q::s::
..,
nlm. 0
-
a
z
'<
;§;
~
0.16
>:. ~I~ I; ............
'<~ ,<I-+) ,,<""" C')
«""1-)
:z:
~I
0.18
II
>:i -. .'1::1 .\L
o 0\~ 00
~ .;:..
~ ):00 (I) :J>
X ~ 0.20 000 0 = ; ~
.?>- 0.22 ~~ z z z Z .t m "1'1
J!
~~ ~ a- ~'"
-.§", --§", 3", 0
m ~ ::a
0 " C.
0.24
Ili Il ~ ~
0 2. 0 0
0.26 ~ ... 0
~
~
0 C
-...l
10
.;:..
8
0.28
0.30
Q
P ~~
CD
..... en
!l
- r-
S' iii: -<
=
0.32
\i! ~ ~ £CD "r- m ::a
~~
0
,..---..... s:
0.34
0.36
t.>
-
Q ~
.....
r
-=
" m 01
m
=
-Z
"1'
r:I: 'Z::a
~.
0
<l>
::J
a
I. a " ,I P , ~"\ i:i:oC') :0
~
0.38
'\
~ g i m
•• \..
-'-+I I<-
b ao(I)
~IIC JI ~::~
Q
III. £
0.
) m c.
~ C') (')
0.44 ... g
:J> J>:.
0.46
tn
~ oZ
- C'l
CD
m-
0.48
~ ~ en ~
a, .....
$l.
0.50 0:::
rn
G)
e .., g
-"
p p p
.
p p
~
0 p
~ R; 0 0 0
~
0 0
m
b
OJ 0 N ~ en OJ
'"
0 ~ m OJ ~ to
'" ... to
m
to
OJ
~
§.
0.08 ~
po
5'
0
~
.?':.
~
II
.?>-
II
e::
0.10
0.12
"-
"'I
~ o • ~I...
<:::-lS::
1:).."
0
m
en
!!!
i:
5'
(1) <:::- I'll.. S 3'
"tJ
c:
~
<:::- I:>..
0.14 f~8~8~8 Z '<
II
5=> I:>.. .;....Iii'" 0.16 8' 8' 8' 8' (")
.;....Iii'" 1+
""1 ""1 .., "'1
en :z:
.?':. 0.18 ,<""'" ,<1"'+,1 ,<""" ,<""'"'
~ C :I>
II ';""1
....."I:l .\l.. &~ ~ til ~
~
x
~
0.20
0.22
8 g
Z Z
~ ~
~ ~
f
CD
~ "'/I
(") 0
.?>- III
m
1 {( ~., ~., :::a
0.24
0.26
~I IS
~
~ ..a. oo c
III
CD
-I
0
0
-..J
\0
Ul
S
0.28
0.30
Ilf '\ ~
1:-'
I\)
~~
-.. enma: _
!e.
AI
CI'
- r-
0(
." :::a
i' r-
til
0.32
0.34
~
~
~~
~
..- mra m
to
Z
"'/I
£1 ~ a. Z 0 ~
=-m
~::
0.36
0
ifII o :::a cO'
::J
'\ ~ (") g,
. I. c. c: ,I 0.38 ~
:.. Z
? 0 ~
)t = en
{Ie
:i'
lf~::: m 0-
~'\ (") aCD
-I c.
0.44
I
~ ~ 0 o
J>
IV'
"'If\. Z g
l: 0.46 en CD
if'\ it
0.48
0.50
~ ~ I
~
--_ .. - --.-.-.--~
C1 J c/d C",.,/O G)
jI 2.65 0.696 0.500 fv=240 DESIGN CHART FOR SECTIONS SUBJECTED TO =s-
O
2.69 0.703 0.480 fv=280 ::J
CD
".
Ghoneim & EI-Mihilmy Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures
Ghoneim & EI-Mihilmy Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures
Cracked Section Moment of Inertia I cr for Rectangular Cracking Moment M cr for rectangular
Sections with 'Tension Reinforcement only 1.4
\.
0.15 I
II I II II~ 1.3
0.14 I
~11
I'!. /J
r;,
h
0.13 I I I 1.2
j
n:EJEe
n 1 '.... [,-
~
Uf 1.1
0.12
I I ~r
12y V
V
Il}
I I 1.0
1+--->1
b VI rl
0.11
II ! ~ 1/
~ "I1( ~j...oo ~II
1
II t 0.9
j VJ 'j
V/v
/~
0.10
0.09 l 1.1
~ ~V ~
~
18 1 , I; V 0.8
fcu=35
~ ~,
I )/ ~ ..... ~ V
~ ~ ~ I;
.j 0.08 J 0.7
~ t ~ i-'"
I~ ~ V
1/ /V .....
II ~I 1/ ~
~ fcu=20
0.07 I ~
V 0.6
I)
V v~ I ~
~
~
..... ..... 1
j ~/
0.06 ~ '~
V 0.5
VII11IIV ~ II-
~~
~
0.05 I I..... V
V
V /I I; 0.4
lilt V' ~
~
I II I) Ii ~ I .~
V
0.04
V
II~ [I i/ \.I~ 0.3
0.03 ~
~~
~~
/ 0.2
l/ V
rd
0.02 '~
~ '/ I 0.1
0.01 ~
0.002 0.006 0.010 0.014 0.018 0.022 0.026 0.030 0.0
~
200 300 400 5,)0 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500
1.1.
h(mm)
". 798
797
I:
i
I!
Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures Ghoneim & EI-Mihilmy Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures
Ghoneim & EI-Mihilmy
1
I factor for sections subjected to bending only
Wk factor for sections subjected to bending only Wk
. 2
f cu=25 N/mm 2
, t/d=1.15, smooth bars, n=10
I 70
f cu =25 N/mm , t/d=1.05, smooth bars, n=10
70
J
•J1=O.OO
/""" 1.003
I I
._.
l7
. ..
t.•••••
65 l -
65
60
f.--
. 1. •
-.e ••
I
II
/
/
/
/ =0.004
II 60
I
V
/
7
/
/
-_."
55
55
50
-. V / / ~
[0.005
50
/ / V ./
...
45
/ V V ./
V
45 I // 7 ./
V
- ---
/ 7 V / V
0.006
40
V V V / /'
40
I / ' /" /'" /
/ / 0.007
I / ' . /V / ' - ---
/ / /'
:.t 35 :.t 35
/ / V / ' /' / ' . /V ./'" 0.006
./'" ./'" - ---
/ / / ./ / ' ../V'
/
30 '0.009 30
25
/ / / V ./ . /V -"V V ~ ~1!~:~12 0.010
25 / / V V / V V V l.,....---" ~ _.- ./
20
II V V V V V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 20
II V V V V V V V t::-: [::::::: ----
~ - _.-
j/V. ~ ? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~§:::~ 0.015
15 I 1/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t:::---::
~
~
15
10
/1 ~ ~ 0 ::;,:::
~~~~ ~ 10 VI ~~~ ~~ ~~
~I-::::
~
~
~
5 1---
o
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0
5
o
0.0 0.2
Iff
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0
Mlbd2 Mlbd2
799 800
Ghoneim & EI-Mihilmy Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures Ghoneim & EI-Mihilmy Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures
Wk factor for sections subjected to bending only Wk factor for sections subjected to bending only
. 2
f cu =25 N/mm2, t/d=1.15, ribbed bars, n=10 f cu =25 N/mm , t/d=1.05, ribbed bars, n=10
70 70 .. . ..
I V ----
65 I
'1"
i/ 65 J / ----
60
+
J V / ./
/'
45 / V '/ /"
V
45 - ---
40
/ / / /v /'"
---
40 V / V V /'
"""~
V
/ / / /'
V ./
..-
::.t 35 I / V v
./" /
/ /'
- ---
V / ' ,.v V
35 ----
30 I /
/
/ ./ /' /'"
----
30 / y
/ / v
/'
V / ' /" / V
25
V V / ' [.../ ~ ~
V / /'
V
./
'"
25 / V . / . /V [.../V ./"'"~ --__.- ./
./' ..
15 15
10 LV~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 10 I. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-
Pr~
~
o
0.0 0.2
fM
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0
5
o
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0
Mlbd
2 Mlbd2
801 802
Ghoneim & EI-Mihilmy Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures
Ghoneim & EI-Mihilmy Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures
60
55
I- -
.~
._!. V
I
/
V
/
/
/
65
60 .
~ I- - _. •-
)
II
/
/
/
/
50 I v /
... - 55
IL /
/
/
_.-
V 1/ / V 50
V V
45
v
./ j / /'
40 I L / L ./
--- 45
II lL 1/ / V
---
1/ V 40
L / V ./
---
J / V . / ---1/ V L
V L . .V .,/ V . /
/ V --- ~ 35
30
I / V /' / 'V V v L V / _.-
v
25 II / / /'"V ...-V .,./"~ ~ ~ _.-_.- 30
I / V ./ .....-' / V ~ ~ ~
20 J / / .// ~ ~ ~ ~ ::::::: ~ 25
L / iVV V V V ~ ~ ~ !:-::::: ~
f V/ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !-- ~~~
~ 20
w _._
10
i/.t ~~ ~~ ~~~
15
/ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
r-
~~
10
5
5 ~~
o
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0
o
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0
Mlbd2
Mlbd2
Values ofSm
Values of Sm
Bar Diameter
11 10 12 14 16 Bar Diameter
18 20 22 25 28 32
0.001 425 500 575 650 725 800 u 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 25 28 32
875 987 1100 1250
0.002 238 275 313 350 388 425 0.001 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 363 400 450
463 519 575 650
0.003 175 200 225 250 275 300 0.002 113 125 138 150 163 175 188 206 225 250
325 363 400 450
0.004 144 163 181 200 219 0.003 92 100 108 117 125 133 142 154 167 183
238 256 284 313 350
.0.005 125 140 155 170 185 200 0.004 81 88 94 100 106 113 119 128 138 150
215 238 260 290
0.006 113 125 138 150 163 0.005 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 113 120 130
175 188 206 225 250
0.007 104 114 125 136 146 0.006 71 75 79 83 88 92 96 102 108 117
157 168 184 200 221
0.008 97 106 116 125 134 0.007 68 71 75 79 82 86 89 95 100 107
144 153 167 181 200
0.009 92 100 108 117 125 133 0.008 66 69 72 75 78 81 84 89 94 100
142 154 167 183
0.010 88 95 103 110 118 0.009 64 (;7· 69 72 75 78 81 85 803 94
125 133 144 155 170
0.011 84 91 98 105 111 0.010 63 65 68 70 73 75 78 81 85 90
118 125 135 145 159
0.012 81 88 94 100 Hi6 0.011 61 64 66 68 70 73 75 78 82 86
113 119 128 138 150
0.013 79 85 90 96 102 0.012 60 63 65 67 69 71 73 76 79 83
108 113 122 131 142
0.014 77 82 88 93 98 0.Q13 60 62 63 65 67 69 71 74 77 81
104 109 117 125 136
0.015 75 80 85 90 95 0.014 59 61 63 64 66 68 70 72 75 79
100 105 113 120 130 0.015 58 60 62 63 65 67 68 71 73 77
803
804
Ghoneim & EI-Mihilmy Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures
Ghoneim & EI-Mihilmy Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures
Wk factor for sections subjected to bending only Wk factor for sections subjected to bending only
2
fcu=50 N/mm
2
, t/d=1.15, ribbed bars, n=10 fcu=50 N/mm , t/d=1.05, ribbed bars, n=10
70 .- - _0-
70
I _L "" ..
/
- --
65
.
I V . 7
65
. V V . ...
I. • / / /
60 I- • / ~ 60
I- • ••
II V V
55
I- • ••
/ V /V 55
[7
/ /
...
II
1/ ./
V ---
50 I /v
50
/ / V V 45
V / / /v
45
V V V '" V ---- I / / /
V
./
-.--
40
.:.!; 35 / /
.I
",V'" /" V
/
vV' ./
- ---
:.< 35
40
II /
V
/ V V L
- .--
30 II / /V 1/ /" V V 17
./
---
30 J V / 'VV V . / ---
V /
J J
\I
~ ~V V VV ./
~
25
j / L / V V V ./'" V" ~ -_ .. ./
_ .. v
/ / L v/ ~ ~ t:::: t::::: t:;:: ~
25 - .. -
/ II V V . . . ~ ~ l-:::: ~ ~ ~ 20
20
"/~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - _.-
15 I 1//v/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
15
f V~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
10
1/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
10
~
5 5
o o
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0
2 Mlbd 2
Mlbd
Bar Diameter
Bar Diameter
12 14 16 20 22 25 28 32 u 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 25 28 32
u 10 18
0.001 425 500 575 650 800 875 987 1100 1250 0.001 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 363 400 450
725
0.002 238 275 313 350 388 425 463 519 575 650 0.002 113 125 138 150 163 175 188 206 225 250
0.003 175 200 225 250 300 363 400 450 0.003 92 100 108 117 125 133 142 154 167 183
275 325
0.004 144 163 181 200 219 238 256 284 313 350 0.004 81 88 94 100 106 113 119 128 138 150
0.005 125 140 155 170 185 200 215 238 260 290 0.005 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 113 120 130
0.006 113 125 138 150 175 188 206 225 250 0.006 71 75 79 83 88 92 96 102 108 117.
163
0.007 104 114 125 136 146 157 168 184 200 221 0.007 68 71 75 79 82 86 89 95 100 107
0.008 97 106 116 125 134 144 153 167 181 200 0.008 66 69 72 75 78 81 84 89 94 100
0.009 92 100 108 117 133 142 154 167 183 0.009 64 67 69 72 75 78 81 85 89 94
125
0.010 \ 95 103 110 125 144 155 170 0.010 63 65 68 70 73 75 78 81 85 90
88 118 133
91 159 0.011 61 64 66 68 70 73 75 78 82 86
0.011 84 98 105 111 118 125 135 145
0.012 81 88 94 100 106 113 128 138 150 0.012 60 63 65 67 69 71 73 76 79 83
119
0.Q13 79 90 96 102 108 113 122 131 142 0.013 60 62 63 65 67 69 71 74 n 81
" 85 0.014 59 61 63 64 66 68 70 72 75 79
0.014 n 82 88 93 98 104 109 117 125 136
0_015 58 60 62 63 65 67 68 71 73 n
0.Q15 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 113 120 130
4
w . =S xk Xl0- 4
W k =Sm xkr xl0-
k m r 'l,
805 806
APPENDIX C
APPENDIXC w
12 EI
~ !""
t- a _ol-I-
'!
b----l wa 2 b wabL
!:1A =--(3L+a) B=--
12EI A 2EI
Deflections and B =~(iJ-a3)
B 6EI
Slopes of Beams
. P x2 '
y=-(3L-x)
6 EI
P L2
B =-
A-DEFLECTION AND SLOPES OF CANTILEVER BEAMS B 2EI
r
!:1=deflection at certain point
y=--(3a-x) O~x~a
6= slope at certain point 6EI
EI =constant P a2
y=--(3x-a) a~x~L
6El
~ t- a b----l A
Pa 3
!:1 = - -
3 El A
Pa 2
B =--
2EI
w W X
2
2 2) Pa 2 Pa 2
y=--(6L -4Lx+x !:1 =--(3L-a) B =--
24EI B 6 El B 2El
. wL4 3
!:1 = - - B = wL
B 8 El B 6 El
M x2
y = 2°El
WX
2
y=--(6a -4ax+x 2 2)
O~x~a
~ M.~ B
M L2
!:1 = - " -
2El
B =Mo L
D El
24EI
w wa 3
~
y=--(4x-a)
I I I II 24El
a~x~L
wa 4 B = wa
3
I---a 01 b-l 11 = - -
A 8 EI A 6El
wa 3 B = wa
3
!:1 =--(4L-a) !:1 = w" L4
D 24EI B 6EI
B 30EI
807 ".
808
y= Pbx (iJ_b2_X2)
6L£1
Pi 8 =Pab(L+b)
A 6LEI .e
B
Pab(L+a)
6LEI
d = 11 WO L4 () = Wo IJ
8 120£1 8 8£1 £#,_---...:'1\:....-1A""" P b (3iJ -4b 2)
j--a b--j ifa~b, de = 48£ I
P X
y=--(3aL-3a 2 -X 2)
W Pi Pi 6EI
P a
!1i
2 2
y=--(3Lx-3x -a)
I I
A"--J~--"'L-IA-"
4 3
wL
d =d
c . max
= 5 wL
384 £ 1
e A
=8 = - -
8 24EI 6E 1 P a (L-a)
. I-a a-j 8 A =8B = 2EI
Pa
d =d . =--(3L 2
-4a 2)
c max 24 E 1
wx
y=--(9i! -24Lx2 + 16x3 )
384 £ 1
,,, 'I
w M x 2
y=_0_(2L -3Lx+x 2)'
Mo 6LEI
l-:-U2 _.
IA
U2-j 5wL4 3w L3 7w L3
~
\J\------"""
A ;(;$., 8 _MoL
A - 3EI
8 __
ML
0_
n- 6EI c
ML2
d =_0_
16EI
d=-- 8=-- 8=--
c 768 EI A 128 El B 384 EI
Xl =L(1- ~) and d max = /jj~1
PX 2 2 Mo M X
y=-O-(L 2 -4x 2)
y=--(3L -4x)
48£ 1 Ci) 24LE 1
,A i I IA d =d
e max
P L3
=--
48 E 1
8 =8 = P L2
A 8 16 El
A I
l-:-U2-f-- U2 - j
IA 8 _MoL
A - 24EI
8 =_MoL
B 24EI
l-:- U2-f-U2-j
".
809 810
y=M o x(L_x)
2EI W L2 -2 2
A W B 11 =--(5L -12a )
e
A
=(J =MoL
B 2EI
11 =11
c max
M L2
=_0_
SEI
,J;!!!!II,Z}!lo c 384 EI
11 =~{a2 (4L+3a)-I}}
l-L I a~ o 24 EI
-PL
e = 7 Wo .I} (J =_0_
W L3 MA =Mn =-S-
A 360 EI B 45 EI
PL
5 L4 L4 M =-
WO .8
11 =~,Xl =0.5193L and 11m.. =0.00652--
c
c 76SEI EI pI}
11 = - -
c 192 E I
2 L2
11=~
c IS.,fj EI
wa3
110 =--(4L+3a)
24EI
811
".
812
REFERE·NCES
10. .
CSA Committee A23.3, "Design of Concrete Structures for Buildings," CAN3-
A23.3-M94 Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Canada, 1994, 199 pp.
References
ECP Committee 203, "The Egyptian Code for Design and Construction of
ACI Commit~~e318,. "Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete Concrete Structures", Housing and Building Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
(AC! 318-02) ,Amencan Concrete Institute, Detroit, 2002. .
EI-Mihilmy, M., "Tendon Stress at Ultimate For Partially-Prestressed
ACI-ASCE Committee 423.3R, "Recommendations for Concrete Members Concrete Flexure Members" Engineering Research Journal, University of
Prestressed with Unbonded Tendons", ACI Journal Proceedings, Vol. 86 Helwan, Vol.96 , pp. C63-C82, 2005.
No.3, 1989, pp. 301-318. '
EI-Mihilmy, M., Tedesco, J., "Deflection Of Reinforced Concrete Beams
ACI Committee 224, "Control of Cracking in Concrete Structures", Strengthened With FRP Plates", ACI, Structural Journal, Vol. 97, No.5,
Concrete International: Design and Construction, Vol. No. 10, October September-October 2000, pp. 679-688
1980, pp. 35-76.
Eurocode 2, "Design of Concrete Structures-Part 1: General Rules and Rules
ACI-ASCE Committee 445, "Recent Approaches to Shear Design of for Buildings (EC-2)" European Prestandard ENV 1992-1-1:1991, Comte
Structural Concrete", State-of-the -Art - Report by ACI-ASCE Committee European de Normalisation, Brussels, 253 pp.
445 on Shear and Torsion. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering V. 124,
No. 12, 1998, pp. 1375-1417. Ghali, A and Favre, R., "Concrete Structures: Stresses and Deformations",
Chapman & Hall, New York, 1986,348 pp.
Am~rican Concrete Institute, Special publication 208, "Examples for the
Deslgn of Structural Concrete with Strut-and- Tie Models" Farmington Ghali; A. and Tadros; M.K., "Partially Prestressed Concrete Structures",
Hills, 2002, 242 pp. ' ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering V. 111, No.8, 1995, pp. 1846-1865.
814
813
Hsu, T. T. C., "ACI Torsion Provisions for Prestressed Hollow Gi~ders", ACI
Structural Journal, V. 94, No.6, Nov.-Dec. 1997, pp. 787-799. Naaman, A. E., "Partially Prestressed Concrete: Review and
Recommendations", Journal of the Prestressed Concrete Institute 30 (1985): 30-
71.
Hsu, T. T. c., "Unified Theory of Reinforced Concrete", CRC Press, Boca
Raton, 1993, pp 193-255.
Park, R. and Paulay T., " Reinforced Concrete Structures''; A Wiley-Inter-
science Publication, Wiley, New York, 1975,769 pp.
Jaco~, S. Gross~~n, "Siml!lified Computations for Effective Moment of
Inertza Ie and ~mlmum Thlckness to Avoid Deflection Computations", ACI PCA, "Notes on ACI 318-95: Building Code Requirements For Structural
Journal Proceedings, Vol. 78, No.6, Nov.- Dec. 1981, pp. 423-440.
Concrete With Design Applications", Skokie, lllinois, 1996,818 pp.
Leet, K. and Bernal, D., "Reinforced Concrete Design", McGraw Hill, New PCI Committee on Prestress Losses, "Recommendations for Estimating
York, 1997,544 pp. Prestress Losses", Journal, Prestressed Concrete Institute, V. 20 No.4, July-
Aug. 1975, pp. 43-75.
Libby, J.R., "Modern Prestressed Concrete", 4th ed., Van Nostrand
Reinhold,'New York, 1990,859 pp. Rogowsky, D. M. And MacGregor, J. G., " Design of Reinforced Concrete
Deep Beams", Concrete International: Design and Construction, V.8, No.8,
M~ttock, Alan H., Chen K. and Soongswang, K. " The Behavior of Aug. 1986, pp. 46-58.
Remforced Concrete Corbels," Journal, Prestressed Concrete Institute, V.
21 No.2, Mar. Apr. 1976, pp. 52-77. Schlaich, 1., Schafer, K. and Jennewein, M., "Toward a Consistent Design of
Structural Concrete", Journal of the Prestressed Concrete Institute, V. 32, No.
MacGregor, J. G. and Ghoneim, M. G. "Design for Torsion", ACI Structural 3, May-June 1987, pp 74-150.
Journal, V. 92, No.2, March-April 1995, pp. 211-218.
Siao, W.B., "Strut-and-Tie Model for Shear Behavior in Deep Beams and Pile
MacGregor, J. G. "Reinforced Concrete - Mechanics & Design", Prentice Hall, Caps Failing in Diagonal Tension", ACI Structural Journal, V. 90, No.4, 1993,
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Second edition, 1992. pp. 356-363.
MacGregor, J.G., "Derivation of Strut-and-Tie Models for the 2002 ACI Code- Zia, Paul; Preston, H. Kent; Scott, Norman L.; and Workman, Edwin B.,
Examples for the Design of Structural Concrete with Strut-and-Tie Models" "Estimating Prestress Losses", Concrete International: Design and
Special publication 208 of ACI, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills: Construction, V.1, No.6, June 1979, pp. 32-38.
2002, pp. 7-40.
Vecchio, F. J. and Collins, M. P., "The Modified Compression Field Theory for
Mattock, A., Kirz, B. and Hognestad, E. "Rectangular Stress Distribution in Reinforced Concrete Elements Subjected to Shear", ACI Journal, V. 83, No.2,
Ultimate Strength Design", ACI Journal, V. 57, No.1, July 1960, pp.I-28. March-April 1986, pp. 219-231.
Marti, P. "Basic Tools of Reinforced Concrete Beam Design" ACI Journal, Vecchio, F. J. and Collins, M. P., "The Response of Reinforced Concrete to
Proceedings, V. 82, No.1, Jan.-Feb. 1985, pp. 46-56. ' In-plane Shear and Normal Stresses", Puhlication No. 82-03, Department'of
Civil Engineering, ~niversity of Toronto, 1982.
Mit~hell, D. and Collins M. P. "Diagonal Compression Field Theory _ A
Ratzonal Model for Structural Concrete in Pure Torsion", ACI Journal, V. 71,
August 1974, pp. 396-408. .
Il,
815 816
Units Conversion Table
"'. .
817
" • • "\/, 0.. "\ "\/\ :~~I y:iS.l1 )~ tl~'il ~j
u:aA y'-,Jl14 ~ b..)1.cl ..,l W±lJi ..,l U"1..p91 ~ .~yJl U:.~ "'..,hll ~
~ .<~II ~I " "I~I tiJ..b 4...u "till 4..k.L......J.l1.....l5.J . _II
~j~IJ y!..:lIJ ~L:k1l t~1 ;is'? t:b
•4..;....)-""'" ~ <..EJ -""'" ~ y " ..r-
..,l J.-j..i..,l ~ b..)L..cJ ..,l t4-.Jiu.'X1 ~~ yt6.l1 b..)t... ulfol ..,l ~ j~ 'X
~I ..,l y'~1 s:-I~ G......jts ~-' t.j4 yt6.l1 s:-1J;>.1 <.y> s:-J;>. t.j14Y
.~yJl <.y> ~bS u~l U-,..) ~-,ys.l)'1 ~I ..,l t.jy'y.dlll
". • "\ ~ :~-,'iI~1
" •• V ~ :~~I ~l
~yJl ~ ~j~ .} F
s:-4- t... ~ ~~-' ~6.lfl4 b~~ ~J ~t6.l1 u-lJ s:-lyJl uUlyJl .JC~
:~t:J1 ~-,ys.l~1 ~y,ll Jc 4.1...lyJl L~ <.y> ,~.m-, yt6.l4
Rconcrete@ link.net
Features
• Reflec1s the very latest Egyptian Code provisions (ECP 203- 2007)
and includes all major changes and additions.
• Numerous illustrations and figures for each topic.
• Good theoretical background for each topic with code provisions.
• Extensive examples in each chapter utilizing SI units.
• All examples are worked out step-by-step ranging from
simple to advanced.
• Full reinforcement details for every example.
• Numerous design charts.