Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ASSIGMENT 1
TITLE
1. INTRODUCTION ………….2
3. THEORY …………………..3
5. RESULTS ……………….5
6. CONCLUSION ………………………………7
7. REFERENCES ……………………………...8
8. APPENDICES ……………………………...9
This assignment analyses the theoretical concept of needs analysis, its actual
implementation in the classroom and the overall evaluation of its results in relation to the
aims set and the objectives accomplished.
The teacher of english in a TEE should always consider the orientation of the
educational system’s curriculum in order to direct the lesson towards the accomplishment
of specific aims and objectives. For this reason, the teacher has to approach students and
get a clear idea of what is in their minds and what their attitude towards English is. In
practice this can be realised through various techniques, one of them being ‘Needs
Analysis’, where students express theis needs and wants, their deficiencies and lacks in
relation to foreign language learning.
1. Theory
Needs analysis offers many advantages as it helps teachers get to know their
audience, identify the actual situation in the classroom, measure up students’ skills and
abilities and spot their differences. Having such data in hand the teacher can evaluate the
whole procedure of the lesson and make the necessary amendments. One could say that
needs analysis becomes a kind of negotiation between teacher and learner on the matter
of lesson methodology and can affect the entire teaching – learning process.
The questionnaire (see App. I) was divided into three sections with different
headings according to the topic handled in each of them. In section A students were asked
to give facts about their learning experience in relation to English. They had to answer
questions such as when they first started learning English, whether they are currently
having English lessons outside school and what is their present situation of knowledge. In
order to see their exact level of acquisition they were asked to evaluate themselves and
give marks from 1 to 10 for specific skills such as speaking, reading, writing, listening,
grammar, vocabulary and pronunciation. They were also asked to state their favourite
skill of all and thus reveal their preference.
Moving on to the third section, students coped with one practical and one
hypothetical question. The first question dealt with the english coursebook and whether
its content is approved by the students. They had to express their thoughts by stating what
they like and dislike about the coursebook’s outlay, presentation features and content.
Then learners were given the chance to “design” the ideal coursebook by choosing the
most popular topics among ten given. In this way it becomes obvious which subjects
trigger students’ interest and which are of less importance to them. With that essential
question the questionnaire was concluded.
3. The results
The idea of a Needs Analysis through the form of a questionnaire was met with
great enthusiasm by students. They liked giving their opinion about the content of english
lessons and they felt that their contribution was valuable. Indeed it was.
The results of the questionnaire (see App. II) were more or less expected. Most
students of the class have started learning english more than four years ago in private
language schools but there are cases that only had English lessons in high school as part
of the secondary education curriculum.
The relatively low level of knowledge in English language is also proven by the
fact that most students marked themselves around basis in relation to performance in
basic skills of English (Q. 3). The problem seems to be in the productive skills (speaking
and writing) while there is a better attitude towards reading as well as vocabulary. Since
there is no linguistic input in their everyday context it goes without saying that listening
and pronunciation are the weak points in students’ performance. Their favourite skill
tends to be reading (Q. 4) as they consider it quite easy.
When asked about the reasons of importance for learning English (Q. 5) the
majority of students voted for work, thus proving the vocational orientation of their
studies. This also became obvious by their preference in learning specific vocational
vocabulary rather than general English (Q. 6). In relation to the way of working in the
classroom (Q. 7) students were divided between pair work and group work and only two
liked working individually. Maybe this is due to the fact that they feel insecure about
their competence, they are afraid to try alone and thus welcome collaboration.
Students are against frequent revision tests because they see them as a continuous
control method with an impact on their semester grade (Q. 10). As far as correction is
When asked whether they would like to change the way of the lesson, most
students said there shouldn’t be any change (Q. 12 -13). That can be translated into a vote
of trust towards the teacher or maybe incapability from the part of students to detect what
they would rather change. Those who favoured change asked for authentic materials,
teaching aids and more fun in the classroom!
Finally, in the last two questions (Q. 14-15) students expressed their disapproval
of the coursebook as they consider it rather difficult for their level, without many
interesting topics and without a reader-friendly layout. The only positive thing they
aknowledged is that they don’t have to pay for it. The ideal coursebook, according to
them, would have many pictures, easy tasks and topics related to teenage problems,
sports, hobbies, holidays, employment, human relations and generally a modern teaching
approach. It seems that the content of the book plays a vital role in the way students
handle the whole english lesson; it can either attract them or drive them away.
4. Conclusion
By designing such a questionnaire about english as a foreign language one can get
valuable information about the target group, the students, and their objective and
subjective needs. Their opinion counts and it is of vast importance that they get involved
in decision - making processes regarding the way the lesson is carried out. Needs
analysis provides space for learner autonomy and self – expression while simultaneously
evaluating the teaching system. It is the first step of control which gives feedback about
educational aims and whether they are achieved. If not there is always the possibility of
change for the better.
Words count: ~1650
Brindley, G. (1986). The role of needs analysis in adult ESL programme design. In R. K.
Johnson (ed) The Second Language Curriculum. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Section A – Facts
7. Which way of working in the classroom do you like? Put a tick (√).
- Individually/alone ________
- Pair work ________
- Group work ________
8. Teaching aids. What do you think would help the lesson? Put a tick (√).
cassette/listening ________
internet/PC ________
TV/Video/ DVD ________
13. Write a suggestion about what you would like to change in the lesson.
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
Section C – Coursebook
14. What is your opinion of the English coursebook that we are doing now?
Write something that you like and something that you don’t like about it.
_____________________________________________________________________
15. The most popular topics for the ideal coursebook are (grade from 1 to 10)
Teenage problems ___________
Human relations ___________
Sports/hobbies ___________
Entertainment/holidays ___________
Environment ___________
Knowledge of the world ___________
Health ___________
Employment/ Job ___________
Family life ___________
Art/Culture ___________ Thank you!!
Answers
Questions Number of Percentage of
students students
12. When did you start learning English?
d) 1 – 2 years ago None None
e) 3 – 4 years ago 5 20%
f) more than 4 years ago 20 80%
and where? (inside or outside school) 5 inside school 20% inside school
20 outside school 80% outside school
13. Are you having English lessons outside
school at the moment? Yes 60%
Yes 15
YES / NO No 40%
No 10
If YES what is the level you attend? Basic 8 Basic 32%
Intermediate 7 Intermediate 28%
If NOT did you get any certificate?
No certificate 10 No certificate 40%