Revised RPMS SY 2018 19 Template AutoCOMP For T1 3 MTs

Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XI
Division of Davao City
Daniel R. Aguinaldo National High School

Matina, Davao City
TEACHER 1-3
Applied Knowledge of content within and

KRA 1- OBJECTIVE 1-
across curriculum teaching areas
Criteria(MOV):
1. COT rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about knowledge of content within
and across curriculum teaching areas
*
* 2. LPs/DLLs developed highlighting integration of content konwledge within and across subject area
3.Instructional materials highlighting mastery of content & its integration in other subject area
4. Performance Tasks/Test material(s) highlighting integration of content knowledge within and across
subject areas
5. Others(please specify and provide annotations)
QUALITY
MAPPING OF COT RATING & RPMS 5- POINT ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
SCALE
COT RATING (PROFICIENT RPMS- 5 POINT SCALE RANGE RPMS 5- POINT
TEACHERS) SCALE
7 5(Outstanding) 4.500- 5.00 5(Outstanding)
6 4(Very Satisfactory) 3.500- 4.499 4(Very Satisfactory)
5 3(Satisfactory) 2.500- 3.499 3(Satisfactory)
4 2(Unsatisfactory) 1.500- 2.499 2(Unsatisfactory)
3 1(Poor) below 1.499 1(Poor)
AVERAGE OF THE MAPPED COT RATING TO THE RPMS 5- POINT SCALE
COT RATING RPMS 5- Points
COT RATING SHEET
(Proficient Teachers) Scale
COT RATING SHEET 1
COT RATING SHEET 2
COT RATING SHEET 3
COT RATING SHEET 4
Total 0
Average 0
EFFICIENCY
5 4 3 2 1
At least 4 2 lessons using

lessons using 3 lessons MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and using MOV 1 and supported by Any 1 of given MOV no evidence
supported by supported by any 1 of any 1 of other
any 1 of other other given MOV given MOV
given MOV
Weight per
Q E T Total Average Objective Score
3 5 3 11 3.67 7.50% 0.2750

Prepared & submitted by: Checked & Reviewed by
Teacher _____ Head Teacher ____

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
TEACHER 1-3
KRA 1- OBJECTIVE 2- Used a range of teaching strategies that

enhance learner achievement in literacy and
numeracy
Criteria(MOV):
1. COT rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement from about teaching strategies that
* enhance learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skills
2. LPs/DLLs used in teaching highlighting learner- centered strategies that promote literacy
* and/or numeracy skills
3. Instructional materials highlighting learner- centered strategies that promote literacy
and/or numeracy skills
4.Performance tasks/tests materials used in teaching
5. Results of assessment used in teaching
6. Others(please specify and provide annotation
QUALITY
SCALE
COT RATING (PROFICIENT RANGE RPMS 5- POINT

TEACHERS) RPMS- 5 POINT SCALE SCALE
COT RATING SHEET
COT RATING SHEET 1
COT RATING SHEET 2
COT RATING SHEET 3
COT RATING SHEET 4
Total 0
Average 0
EFFICIENCY
5 4 3 2 1
At least 4 2 learner-
learner- 3 learner-centered centered
centered lessons evident in lessons evident 1 learner-centered
lessons evident MOV 1 and 1 in MOV 1 and 1 lessons evident in no evidence
in MOV 1 and 1 supported by any 1 supported by any of given MOV
supported by other MOV any 1 other
any 1 other MOV
MOV
Weight per
4 5 9 4.5 7.50% 0.3375

________________________________
Region XI

Matina, Davao City
TEACHER 1-3
KRA 1- OBJECTIVE 3- Applied a range of teaching strategies to

develop critical and creative thinking as well as
other Higher- Order Thinking Skills
Criteria(MOV):
1. COT rating sheet and/or Inter- observer agreement form about teaching strategies to develop
* critical and creative thinking, as well as other Higher- Order Thinking skills
2. LPs/DLLs used in teaching highlighting differentiated teaching strategies that developed creative
* thinking and/or other HOTS
3. Instructional materials highlighting differentiated strategies that develop critical and creative
thinking and/or other HOTS
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used in teaching
6. Others(Please specify and provide annotation)
QUALITY
SCALE
COT RATING SHEET
COT RATING SHEET 1
COT RATING SHEET 2
COT RATING SHEET 3
COT RATING SHEET 4
Total 0
Average 0
EFFICIENCY
5 4 3 2 1
At least 4 2 lessons
lessons 3 lessons evidenced by evidenced by
evidenced by MOV 1 and supported 1 lessons as
MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and evidenced by any 1 no evidence
supported by by any 1 of other given supported by of given MOV
MOV any 1 of other
any 1 of other given MOV
given MOV
Weight per
4 5 9 4.5 7.50% 0.3375

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
TEACHER 1-3
KRA 2- OBJECTIVE 4- Managed classroom structure to engage

learners, individually or in groups in meaningful
exploration, discovery and hands-on activities
within a range of physical learning environment
Criteria(MOV):
1. COT rating sheet and/or Inter-observer agreement form about managing classroom structure that
* engage learners in various activities
2. LPs/DLLs highlighting various classroom management strategies that engage learners in
* activities/tasks in different physical learning environments
3. Others(Please specify and provide annotations)
QUALITY
SCALE
COT RATING SHEET
COT RATING SHEET 1
COT RATING SHEET 2
COT RATING SHEET 3
COT RATING SHEET 4
Total 0
Average 0
EFFICIENCY
5 4 3 2 1
2 lessons
At least 4 supported by 1 lesson supported
supported by 3 lessons supported by MOV 1 and any
MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any 1 of other given by anyMOV
acceptable no evidence
1 of other given other acceptable MOV 1 of
acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV
Weight per
4 5 9 4.5 7.50% 0.3375


Region XI

Matina, Davao City
TEACHER 1-3
KRA 2- OBJECTIVE 5 Managed learner behavior constructively by

applying positive and non- violent discipline to
ensure learning- focused environments
Criteria(MOV):
COT rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about teachers management of learner
behavior using the following strategies:
* 1. Providing motivation
* 2. Praising the learners/giving positive feedback
3. setting house rules/guidelinhes
* 4. Ensuring learners active participation
5. Allowing learners to express their ideas/opinion
6. Giving equal opportunities to learners
* 7. Encouraging learners to ask questions
QUALITY
SCALE
COT RATING SHEET
COT RATING SHEET 1
COT RATING SHEET 2
COT RATING SHEET 3
COT RATING SHEET 4
Total 0
Average 0
EFFICIENCY
5 4 3 2 1
At least 4 given At least 4 of given At least 4 given Any 1 of given

strategies strategies
observed in at strategies as observed observed in 2 strategies observed no evidence
in 3 lessons only in 1 lesson
least 4 lessons lessons
Weight per
4 5 9 4.5 7.50% 0.3375

______________________________
Region XI

Matina, Davao City
TEACHER 1-3
KRA 2- OBJECTIVE 6- Used differentiated, developmentally

appropriate learning experiences to address
learners gender, needs, strengths, interests
and experiences
Criteria(MOV):
1. COT rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about using differentiated,
developmentally appropriate learning experiences
*
2. LPs/DLLs developed highlighting differentiation in content, product, process, learning
environment/ others according to learners gender, needs, strengths, interests &
experiences
*
3. Instructional materials developed highlighting differentiation in content, product,
process, learning environment or others according to learners gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
QUALITY
SCALE
COT RATING SHEET
COT RATING SHEET 1
COT RATING SHEET 2
COT RATING SHEET 3
COT RATING SHEET 4
Total 0
Average 0
EFFICIENCY
5 4 3 2 1
At least 4 2 differentiated
differentiated 3 differentiated teaching
teaching teaching strategies in strategies in at Any 1 differentiated
strategies in at at least 2 lessons as least 2 lessons as teaching strategy in
least 2 lessons as only 1 lesson
evidenced by evidenced by MOV 1 evidenced by evidently shown in no evidence
MOV 1 and and supported by any MOV 1 and any 1 of acceptable
1 of other acceptable supported by any
supported by any MOV
MOV 1 of other
1 of other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV
Weight per
5 5 10 5 7.50% 0.375
Region XI

Matina, Davao City
TEACHER 1-3
______________________________
KRA 3- OBJECTIVE 7- Planned, managed and implemented

developmentally sequenced teaching and
learning processes to meet curriculum
requirements and varied teaching contests
Criteria(MOV):
1. COT rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement from about using developmentally
sequenced teaching and learning process
2. LPs/DLLs highlighting developmentally sequenced instruction that meet curriculum
goals and varied teaching contents
3. Instructional Materials used to implement developmentally sequenced teaching and
learning process to meet curriculum requirements & varied teaching contexts
4. Others(Please specify and provide annotations0
QUALITY
SCALE
COT RATING SHEET
COT RATING SHEET 1
COT RATING SHEET 2
COT RATING SHEET 3
COT RATING SHEET 4
Total 0
Average 0
EFFICIENCY
5 4 3 2 1
At least 4 3 developmentally 2 developmentally 1 developmentally

developmentally sequenced teaching & sequenced teaching sequenced
sequenced teaching & learning process
learning process teaching learning
learning process evidently evidently shown evidently shown in no evidence
in MOV 1 and process evidently
shown in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported supported by any 1 shown in any 1 of
supported by any 1 of by any 1 of given MOV of other given MOV other given MOV
given MOV
Weight per
5 5 10 5 7.50% 0.375
Region XI

Matina, Davao City
TEACHER 1-3
______________________________
KRA 3- OBJECTIVE 8- Participated in collegial discussions that use

teacher and learner feedback to enrich
teaching practice
Criteria(MOV):
* 1. Personal notes of teachers on LACs/FGDs/Meetings with proof of attendance
2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of teacher and learner feedback to enrich teaching
* practice with prrof of attendance
Rating Quality Efficiency

Consistently participated in LACs/FGDs
meetings to discuss teacher/learner Participated in at least 4 LACS/FGDs meetings evidently
5 feedback to enrich instruction as shown shown in any 1 of given MOV
in MOV
Frequently participated in LACs/FGDs

meetings to discuss teacher/learner Participated in 3 LACS/FGDs meetings evidently shown in
4 feedback to enrich instruction as shown any 1 of given MOV
in MOV
Occasionally participated in LACs/FGDs

meetings to discuss teacher/learner Participated in 2 LACS/FGDs meetings evidently shown in
3 feedback to enrich instruction as shown any 1 of given MOV
in MOV
Rarely participated in LACs/FGDs

meetings to discuss teacher/learner Participated in 1 LAC/FGD meeting evidently shown in any
2 feedback to enrich instruction as shown 1 of given MOV
in MOV
1 no evidence no evidence
Weight per
5 5 10 5 7.50% 0.375
______________________________
Region XI

Matina, Davao City
TEACHER 1-3
KRA 3- OBJECTIVE 9- Selected, developed, organized and used

appropriate teaching and learning resources,
including ICT, to address learning goals
Criteria(MOV):
1. COT rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about using appropriate teaching
* and learning resources, including ICT
Examples:
*Activity sheets/task sheet/work sheet
*Video clips
*Module
*SIMs- Strategic Intervention Materials
*Others
* 2. LPs/DLLs with appropriate Instructional materials appended
QUALITY
SCALE
COT RATING SHEET
COT RATING SHEET 1
COT RATING SHEET 2
COT RATING SHEET 3
COT RATING SHEET 4
Total 0
Average 0
EFFICIENCY
5 4 3 2 1
2 varied teaching
learning
At least 4 varied teaching 3 varied teaching resources, any teaching learning
learning resources, learning resources, including ICT resources, including
including ICT evidently including ICT evidently
shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and evidently shown ICT evidently shown no evidence
in MOV 1 and in any acceptable
supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of supported by any MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV 1 of acceptable
MOV
Weight per
5 4 9 4.5 7.50% 0.3375

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
TEACHER 1-3
______________________________
KRA 4- OBJECTIVE 10- Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic., formative and
summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum
requirements
Criteria(MOV):
1. Classroom observation tool(COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about
* using diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies
2. Prepared lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting appropriiate use of formative assessment
* strategies
3. Developed diagnostic tests: (a)with TOS reviewed by superior; (b)with sample accomplished
questionnaire/anser sheets
4. Developed summative tests: (a)with TOS reviewed by superior; (b)with sample accomplished
* questionnaire/answer sheets
5. Developed performance tasks: (a)with rubricsreviewed by superior; (b)with sample
accomplished rubrics
Designed, selected, organized & used

diagnostic, formative and summative At least 4 varied assessment tools as
5 assessment strategies consistent with
evidently shown in any 1 of acceptable MOV
curriculum requirements as shown in MOV
with a rating of 7

diagnostic, formative and summative 3 varied assessment tools as evidently
shown in any 1 of acceptable MOV
with a rating of 6

diagnostic, formative and summative 2 varied assessment tools as evidently
shown in any 1 of acceptable MOV
with a rating of 5

diagnostic, formative and summative 1 assessment tool as evidently shown in
acceptable MOV
with a rating of 4
Weight per
4 2 6 3 7.50% 0.2250

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
TEACHER 1-3
Teacher ______ Head Teacher ____- _____
KRA 4 - OBJECTIVE 11- Monitored and evaluated learner progress and

achievement using learner attainment
Criteria(MOV):
1. Compilation of a learners written work with summary of results and with signature of parents
2. Formative/summative assessment tools with TOS and frequency of errors with identified
least mastered skills
3. Class records/grading sheets
4. Lesson plans/modified DDLLs showing index of mastery
Rating Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Consistently monitored & evaluated Submitted MOV were
learner progress & achievement using Combination of at least 4 of
5 learner attainment data as shown in acceptable MOV distributed across 4
quarters
MOV submitted
Frequently monitored & evaluated Submitted MOV were

learner progress & achievement using
4 learner attainment data as shown in Combination of 3 of acceptable MOV distributed across 3
quarters
MOV submitted
Occasionally monitored & evaluated Submitted MOV were

learner progress & achievement using
3 learner attainment data as shown in Combination of 2 of acceptable MOV distributed across 2
quarters
MOV submitted
Rarely monitored & evaluated learner Submitted MOV were

progress & achievement using learner
2 attainment data as shown in MOV Any 1 of the given MOV distributed across 1
quarters
submitted
1 no evidence no evidence no evidence
Weight per
4 3 3 10 3 7.50% 0.25

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
TEACHER 1-3
KRA 4- OBJECTIVE 12- Communicated promptly and clearly the learners needs,
progress and achievement to key stakeholders, including
parents/guardians
Criteria(MOV):
1. At least 3 samples of corrected test papers of the same 3 learners in the same learning area
with parents or guardians signature and date of receipt
2. Minutes of PTA meetings or Parent- Teacher conferences in all quarters with proof of
parents/guardians attendance
3. Report cards with parents or guardians signature in all quarters supported by minutes of
meeting
4. Communication with parents/guardians using various modalities
5. Anecdotal record showing entries per quarter
6. Other documents showing learners needs, progress and achievement submitted to to the
stakeholders
Rating Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Consistently showed prompt & clear Submitted MOV were
communications of learners needs, progress Combination of at least 4 of
5 & achievement to key stakeholders, including acceptable MOV distributed across 4
parents/guardians quarters
Frequently showed prompt & clear Submitted MOV were

communications of learners needs, progress
4 & achievement to key stakeholders, including Combination of 3 of acceptable MOV distributed across 3
Occasionally showed prompt & clear Submitted MOV were

3 & achievement to key stakeholders, including Combination of 2 of acceptable MOV distributed across 2
Rarely showed prompt & clear Submitted MOV were

2 & achievement to key stakeholders, including Any 1 of the given MOV distributed across 1
1 no evidence no evidence no evidence
Weight per
3 5 3 11 4 7.50% 0.275

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
TEACHER 1-3
KRA 5- OBJECTIVE 13- Performed various related works/activities that contribute to

the teaching- learning process
Criteria(MOV):
1. Certificate of Recognition or Participation
2. Certificate of Training
3. Certificate of Speakership
4. Committee involvement
5. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities
6. Book of Journal Authorship/Co-authorship/Contributorship
7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship
8. Coaching and mentoring learners in competitions
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-service teachers
10. Others(Please specify and provide annotations

Consistently performed various related
work/activities that contribute to the
5 teaching learning process as shown in MOV At least 4 different kinds of acceptable MOV
submitted
Frequently performed various related

4 teaching learning process as shown in MOV 3 different kinds of acceptable MOV
submitted
Occasionally performed various related

3 teaching learning process as shown in MOV 2 different kinds of acceptable MOV
submitted
Rarely performed various related

2 teaching learning process as shown in MOV 1 of acceptable MOV
submitted
Weight per
5 5 10 5 10.00% 0.5

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
Tel. Fax No.: 297-3322 Tel. No.: 298-3318
TEACHERS I- 3
Figure 3.21- COMPUTATION TABLE WITH FINAL RATING

Weight Numerical Ratings
Weight
KRA Objectives per Score
per KRA Q E T Ave
Objective
Objective 1 7.50% 3 5 3 3.7 0.2750
1 22.50% Objective 2 7.50% 4 5 0 4.50 0.3375
Objective 3 7.50% 4 5 0 4.50 0.3375
Objective 4 7.50% 4 5 0 4.50 0.3375
2 22.50% Objective 5 7.50% 4 5 0 4.50 0.3375
Objective 6 7.50% 5 5 0 5.00 0.3750
Objective 7 7.50% 5 5 0 5.00 0.3750
3 22.50% Objective 8 7.50% 5 5 0 5.00 0.3750
Objective 9 7.50% 5 4 0 4.50 0.3375
Objective 10 7.50% 4 2 0 3.00 0.2250
4 22.50% Objective 11 7.50% 4 3 3 3.33 0.2500
Objective 12 7.50% 3 5 3 3.67 0.2750
5 10% Objective 13 10% 5 5 0 5.00 0.5000
Final Rating 4.3375
Adjectival Rating VS
Figure 3.22- Adjectival Rating Equivalences

Range RPMS- 5 Point Rating Scale
4.500- 5.00 5( Outstanding)
3.500- 4.499 4(Very Satisfactory)
2.500- 3.499 3(Satisfactory)
1.500- 2.499 2(Unsatisfactory)
below 1.499 1(Poor)
Prepared & submitted by: Checked
Teacher ______ Head Teacher ____- _______

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
Master Teacher I- II
KRA 1- OBJECTIVE 1- Modelled effective applications of content knowledge within and

Criteria(MOV):
1. COT rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about knowledge of content within and
2. LPs/DLLs developed highlighting integration of content knowledge within and across subject
areas
3. Instructional materials highlighting mastery of content and its integration in other subject areas
4. Performance Tasks/Test material(s) highlighting integration of content knowledge within and across
subject areas
5. Results of assessment used in demonstration teaching highlighting mastery of lessons learned
6. Others(Please specify and provide annotations0
QUALITY
MAPPING OF COT RATING & RPMS 5- POINT SCALE ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
COT RATING RPMS 5- POINT

RPMS- 5 POINT SCALE RANGE
(HIGHLY PROFICIENT SCALE
TEACHERS)

COT RATING
COT RATING SHEET RPMS 5- Points Scale
(Proficient Teachers)
COT RATING SHEET 1
COT RATING SHEET 2
COT RATING SHEET 3
COT RATING SHEET 4
Total 0
Average 0
EFFICIENCY
5 4 3 2 1
2 lessons
4 3 evidenced by
lessons 1 lesson as evidences by
lessons evidenced by MOV 1 MOV ! From
evidenced by MOV 1 MOV 1 from colleagues and
and supported by from colleagues and colleagues and supported by any 1 of given no evidence
supported by any of other supported by
any of other given MOV
given MOV any 1 of given
MOV
MOV
Q E T Total Average Weight per Objective Score
0 0 0 0 7.50% 0
Prepared & submitted by: Checked and Reviewed:
Teacher ______ Head Teacher ____ - __________

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
KRA 1- OBJECTIVE 2-
Collaborated with colleagues in the conduct and application of
research to enrich knowledge of content and pedagogy
Criteria(MOV):
1. Copy of the research proposal focused on enriching knowledge of content & pedagogy
2. Proof of participation and/or contribution to a collaborative research(e.g. e-mail, actual output
submitted, terms of reference, etc)
3. Certified completed collaborative research focused on enriching knowledge of content and
pedagogy
4. Proof of dessimination of research findings with colleagues
5. Proof of utilization of research findings
6. Others(please specify and provide anotation

Conducted/completed & dessiminated
5 action research with colleagues
Submitted at least 4 given MOV
4 Conducted & completed action research Submitted any 3 of acceptable MOV

with colleagues
3 Conducted action research with colleagues Submitted any 2 MOV
Proposed action research with action

2 research Submitted any 1 MOV
1 no evidenced no evidenced
0 0 0 0 0 7.50% 0
Prepared & submitted by: Checked and Reviewed
Master Teacher ____ Head Teacher ____- _________

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
KRA 1- OBJECTIVE 3- Developed and applied effective teaching strategies to promote

critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher- order
thinking skills
Criteria(MOV):
1. COT rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about teaching strategies to develop
critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher- order thinking skills
2. LPs/DLLs used in teaching highlighting different teaching strategies that developed creative
3. Instructional materials highliughting different strategies that develop critical and creative
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used in the demonstration teaching
QUALITY
COT RATING (HIGHLY RPMS- 5 POINT SCALE RANGE RPMS 5- POINT

PROFICIENT TEACHERS) SCALE

COT RATING
COT RATING SHEET 1
COT RATING SHEET 2
COT RATING SHEET 3
COT RATING SHEET 4
Total 0
Average 0
EFFICIENCY
5 4 3 2 1
4 or 2 lessons
more lessons as 3 evidently shown 1
evidently shown in lessons as evidently shown in in MOV 1 and lesson as evidently shown in
MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of supported by MOV 1 and supported by no evidence
by any 1 of other given other given MOV any of goiven any other given MOV
MOV MOV

0 0 0 0 7.50% 0

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
KRA 2- OBJECTIVE 4- Worked with colleagues to model and share effective techniques in the
management of classroom structure to engage learners, individually or
in groups, in meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on activities
within a range of physical learning environments
Criteria(MOV):
1. COT rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about sharing effective techniques in
the management of classroom structure
2. LPs/DLLs used in demonstration teaching highlighting effective classroom management
strategies that engage learners in activities/tasks in different physical learning environments
3. Minutes of the LAC highlighting the sharing on effective classroom management technique
4. Instructional materials used in demonstration teaching
QUALITY
COT RATING (HIGHLY RPMS- 5 POINT SCALE RANGE RPMS 5- POINT

PROFICIENT TEACHERS) SCALE

COT RATING
COT RATING SHEET 1
COT RATING SHEET 2
COT RATING SHEET 3
COT RATING SHEET 4
Total 0
Average 0
EFFICIENCY
5 4 3 2 1
2 lessons
At least 4 lessons supported by
supported by MOV 1 3 lessons supported by MOV 1
and any 1 of acceptable and any 1 of acceptable MOV MOV 1 and any 1 any 1 of acceptable MOV no evidence
MOV of acceptable
MOV
0 0
0 0 7.50% 0

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
KRA 2- OBJECTIVE 5- Exhibited effective and constructive behavior management skills by applying
positive and non- violent discipline to ensure learning- focused environments
Criteria(MOV):
COT rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about effective teacher management of
learner behavior using the following strategies:
1. Providing motivation
2. Praising the learners/giving positive feedback
3. setting house rules/guidelinhes
4. Ensuring learners active participation
5. Allowing learners to express their ideas/opinion
6. Giving equal opportunities to learners
7. Encouraging learners to ask questions
QUALITY
COT RATING RPMS 5- POINT
(HIGHLY PROFICIENT RPMS- 5 POINT SCALE RANGE
TEACHERS) SCALE

COT RATING
COT RATING SHEET 1
COT RATING SHEET 2
COT RATING SHEET 3
COT RATING SHEET 4
Total 0
Average 0
EFFICIENCY
5 4 3 2 1
applied 7 of given applied 7 of given applied 7 of given applied any of the given
strategies observed strategies observed in at strategies observed strategies observed in only 1 no evidence
in at least 4 lessons least 3 lessons in at least 2 lessons lesson
0 0 0 0 7.50% 0

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
KRA 2- OBJECTIVE 6- Worked with colleagues to share differentiated, developmentally

appropriate opportunities to address learners differences in gender, needs,
strengths, interest and experiences
Criteria(MOV):
1. Minutes of LAC session/s, highlightings one's sharing of strategies on differentiated and
developmentally- appropriate opportunities to address learneers" differences
2. LPs/DLLs highlightings strategies on differentiated and developmentally- appropriate
opportunities to address learners differences
3. Corresponding instructional materials showing differentiated and developmentally appropriate
opportunities to address learners differences
4. Others(e.g. testimonial, write-up from colleagues of the lessons/insights gained from the Master
Teacher's sharing
Worked w/ colleagues at least in the at least 1 lesson evidently shown in MOV 1 and
5 District/Cluster level supported by any acceptable MOV
at least 1 lesson evidently shown in MOV 1 and

4 Worked w/ colleagues in the school level supported by any acceptable MOV
Worked w/ colleagues in the at least 1 lesson evidently shown in MOV 1 and
3 department/grade level supported by any acceptable MOV
Worked w/ colleagues in the
department/grade level but no evidenced of at least 1 lesson evidently shown in MOV 1 and
2 supported by any acceptable MOV
sharing

0 0 0 0 7.50% 0
Master Teacher ____ Head Teacher ____- ___________

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
KRA 3- OBJECTIVE 7- Developed and applied effective strategies in the planning and
management of developmentally curriculum requirements and
varied teaching contents quenced teaching and learning
processes to meet
Criteria(MOV):
1. COT rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreeemtn form about using effective strategies in implementing
developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process
2. Results of learners assessment during the actual teaching
3. LPs/DLLs used in demonstration teaching highlighting developmentally sequenced teaching- learning
process
4. Instructional Materials showing effective strategies in developmentally sequenced teaching and learning
process
5. Performance tasks/tests material(s) used in demonstration teaching
QUALITY
COT RATING (HIGHLY RPMS- 5 POINT SCALE RANGE RPMS 5- POINT SCALE
PROFICIENT TEACHERS)


COT RATING
COT RATING SHEET 1
COT RATING SHEET 2
COT RATING SHEET 3
COT RATING SHEET 4
Total 0
Average 0
EFFICIENCY
5 4 3 2 1
at least 4 lessons 2-3 lessons 1 lesson

evidenced by MOV 1 evidenced by MOV 1 and 2 evidenced 1 lesson
and 2 supported by by MOV 1 and/or 2 as evidenced by any 1 of no evidence
any I of acceptable supported by any I of supported by any I acceptable MOV
MOV acceptable MOV of acceptable MOV

0 0 0 0 7.50% 0

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
KRA 3- OBJECTIVE 8- Reviewed with colleagues, teacher and learner

feedback to plan, facilitate and enrich teaching
practice
Criteria(MOV):
1. Implemented LAC/FGD Plan
2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of teacher and leaarner feedback to enrich teaching practice
with proof of attendance
3. Others(Please specify and provide annotation)

4 collaborative reviews of teacher & learner
Consistently documented collaborative
5 review and feedback feedback evident in MOV 1 and supported by
any 1 of acceptable MOV
Frequently documented collaborative review 3 collaborative reviews of teacher & learner

4 w/ feedback feedback evident in MOV 1 and supported by
2 collaborative reviews of teacher & learner

Occasionally documented collaborative
3 review and feedback feedback evident in MOV 1 and supported by
2 Rarely documented collaborative review and 1 collaborative reviews of teacher & learner
feedback feedback evident inany of acceptable MOV
1 no evidenced no evidenced
Weight per
Q E T Total Average Score
Objective
0 0 0 0 7.50% 0
Master Teacher ____ Head Teacher ____- _______________

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
KRA 3- OBJECTIVE 9- Advised and guided colleagues in the selection,

organization, development and use of appropriate
teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to
address specific learning goals
Criteria(MOV):
1. Teaching and learning resources developed by colleagues and critiques on their alignment to
learning goals
2. Lesson plans by colleagues critiqued in terms of the alignment of the teaching and learning
resources to the indicated learning goals and appropriateness to the target learners.
Consistently advised colleagues in selection,

organization, development & appropriate At least 4 teaching & learning resources
5 use of teaching & learning resources as evidenced by at least 1 accpetable MOV
shown in MOV
Frequently advised colleagues in selection,

organization, development & appropriate 3 teaching & learning resources evidenced by at
4 use of teaching & learning resources as least 1 accpetable MOV
shown in MOV
Occasionally advised colleagues in selection,

shown in MOV
Rarely advised colleagues in selection,

shown in MOV
Weight per
Objective
0 0 0 0 7.50% 0
Master Teacher ____ Head Teacher ____- ______________

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
KRA 4- OBJECTIVE 10- Work collaboratively with colleagues to review and

desig, selection, organization and use of a range of
effective diagnostic, formative & summative
assessment strategies consistent with curriculum
requirement
Criteria(MOV):
1. Any proof of ollaborative review if the test is designed based on its purpose(e.g. diagnostic,
formative
2. andofsummative)
Any proof collaborative review of the alignment of the test with the curriculum
2.1 formative test attached to a lesson plan
2.2 summative assessment with TOS
2.3 diagnostic test with its TOS

Consistently reviewed collaboratively
5 assessment tools with colleagues as shown At least 4 Assessment Tools evident as MOV
in MOV
Frequently reviewed collaboratively

4 assessment tools with colleagues as shown 3 Assessment Tools evident as MOV
in MOV
Occasionally reviewed collaboratively

3 assessment tools with colleagues as shown 2 Assessment Tools evident as MOV
in MOV
Rarely reviewed collaboratively assessment

2 tools with colleagues as shown in MOV 1 Assessment Tools evident as MOV
Weight per
Objective
0 0 0 0 7.50% 0
Master Teacher ____ Head Teacher ____- _______________

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
KRA 4- OBJECTIVE 11- Interpreted collaboratively monitoring and

evaluation strategies of attainment data to support
learner progress and achievement
Criteria(MOV):
1. Collaborative interpretation of the index of mastery obtained from 1 class
2. Collaborative interpretation of item analysis of quarterly examinations
3. Collaborative interpretation of results performnce assessment
4. Others(please specify with annotation)
Consistently collaborated with colleagues in

5 interpretation of assessment data as shown At least 2 different types of MOV
in MOV submitted
Frequently collaborated with colleagues in

4 interpretation of assessment data as shown At least 3 of the same kind of MOV
in MOV submitted
Occasionally collaborated with colleagues in

3 interpretation of assessment data as shown At least 2 of the same kind of MOV
in MOV submitted
Rarely collaborated with colleagues in

2 interpretation of assessment data as shown Any 1 of the MOV
in MOV submitted
Weight per
Objective
0 0 0 0 7.50% 0
Master Teacher ____ Head Teacher ____- _____________

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
KRA 4- OBJECTIVE 12- Applies skills in the effective communication of

learner needs, progress and achievement to key
stakeholders including parents/guardians
Criteria(MOV):
1. Sample agreement for learners at risks signed by parents and corresponding evidence of
improvement
2. Record of dialogue and/or parent- teacher conference and corresponding evidence of
improvement
3. Anecdotal record communicated to and signed by the learners and/or parents with
corresponding evidence of improvement
4. Sample of learners test results signed by parents and corresponding evidence of improvement
5. Sample of accomplished rubrics given for performance task and corresponding evidence of
improvement
6. Attendance sheet/minutes of parent- teacher conference
7. Signed report cards of students at risk with corresponding evidence of improvement
8. Correspondence notebook/letters/proof of communication using other modaalities(e.g. e-mail,
SMS, etc) and corresponding evidence of improvement
9. Learners performance record
10.Others(Please specify and provide annotations)

Consistently applied skills in effective
communication of learner needs and
5 progress to parents/guardians as shown in at least 3 acceptable MOV
MOV
Frequently applied skills in effective

4 progress to parents/guardians as shown in any 3 MOV
MOV
Occasionally applied skills in effective

MOV
Rarely applied skills in effective

MOV
Weight per
Objective
0 0 0 0 7.50% 0

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
Master Teacher ____ Head Teacher ____- ________________
KRA 5- OBJECTIVE 13- Performed various related works/activities that

contribute to the teaching- learning process
Criteria(MOV):
1. Served as reliever of classes in the absence of teachers
2. Served as OIC in the absence of the principal
3. Represented the principal in meetings and conferences
4. Observed classes of teachers 1-111
5. Assisted the school selection committee in the evaluation of credentials when hiring or promoting
teachers
6. Certificate of Recognition or Participation
7. Certificate of Training
8. Certificate of speakeership
9. Committee involvement
10. Advisorship of Co- curricular activities
11. Book of Journal Authorship/Co- authorship/Contributorship
12. Coordinatorship/Chairmanship
13.Coaching and mentoring learners in competition
14. Mentoring pre- service/in-service teachers

Consistently performed special tasks and/or At least 4 different kinds of acceptable MOV
5 assignments as shown in MOV
Frequently performed special tasks and/or
4 assignments as shown in MOV Only 3 different kinds of acceptable MOV
Occasionally performed special tasks and/or 2 different kinds of acceptable MOV

3 assignments as shown in MOV
Rarely performed special tasks and/or
2 assignments as shown in MOV Any 1 of acceptable MOV
Weight per
Objective
0 0 0 0 10.00% 0
Master Teacher ____ Head Teacher ____- _____________

Region XI

Matina, Davao City
Tel. Fax No.: 297-3322 Tel. No.: 298-3318
MASTER TEACHERS I- II
Figure 3.21- COMPUTATION TABLE WITH FINAL RATING
Weight Weight per Numerical Ratings

KRA Objectives Score
per KRA Objective Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.50% 0 0 0 0.00 0.000
1 22.50% Objective 2 7.50% 0 0 0 0.00 0.000
Objective 3 7.50% 0 0 0 0.00 0.000
Objective 4 7.50% 0 0 0 0.00 0.000
2 22.50% Objective 5 7.50% 0 0 0 0.00 0.000
Objective 6 7.50% 0 0 0 0.00 0.000
Objective 7 7.50% 0 0 0 0.00 0.000
3 22.50% Objective 8 7.50% 0 0 0 0.00 0.000
Objective 9 7.50% 0 0 0 0.00 0.000
Objective 10 7.50% 0 0 0 0.00 0.000
4 22.50% Objective 11 7.50% 0 0 0 0.00 0.000
Objective 12 7.50% 0 0 0 0.00 0.000
5 10% Objective 13 10% 0 0 0 0.00 0.000
Final Rating 0.000
Adjectival Rating
Figure 3.22- Adjectival Rating Equivalences

Range RPMS- 5 Point Rating Scale
4.500- 5.00 5( Outstanding)
3.500- 4.499 4(Very Satisfactory)
2.500- 3.499 3(Satisfactory)
1.500- 2.499 2(Unsatisfactory)
below 1.499 1(Poor)
Prepared & submitted by: Checked
Master Teacher ______ Head Teacher ____- _______

Revised RPMS SY 2018 19 Template AutoCOMP For T1 3 MTs

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Revised RPMS SY 2018 19 Template AutoCOMP For T1 3 MTs

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Republic of the Philippines

Daniel R. Aguinaldo National High School

Applied Knowledge of content within and

At least 4 2 lessons using

3 5 3 11 3.67 7.50% 0.2750

Teacher _____ Head Teacher ____

Daniel R. Aguinaldo National High School

KRA 1- OBJECTIVE 2- Used a range of teaching strategies that

COT RATING (PROFICIENT RANGE RPMS 5- POINT

4 5 9 4.5 7.50% 0.3375

Daniel R. Aguinaldo National High School

KRA 1- OBJECTIVE 3- Applied a range of teaching strategies to

4 5 9 4.5 7.50% 0.3375

Prepared & submitted by: Checked & Reviewed by

Teacher _____ Head Teacher ____

Daniel R. Aguinaldo National High School

KRA 2- OBJECTIVE 4- Managed classroom structure to engage

4 5 9 4.5 7.50% 0.3375

Teacher _____ Head Teacher ____

Daniel R. Aguinaldo National High School

KRA 2- OBJECTIVE 5 Managed learner behavior constructively by

At least 4 given At least 4 of given At least 4 given Any 1 of given

4 5 9 4.5 7.50% 0.3375

Daniel R. Aguinaldo National High School

KRA 2- OBJECTIVE 6- Used differentiated, developmentally

Daniel R. Aguinaldo National High School

KRA 3- OBJECTIVE 7- Planned, managed and implemented

At least 4 3 developmentally 2 developmentally 1 developmentally

Daniel R. Aguinaldo National High School

KRA 3- OBJECTIVE 8- Participated in collegial discussions that use

Rating Quality Efficiency

Frequently participated in LACs/FGDs

Occasionally participated in LACs/FGDs

Rarely participated in LACs/FGDs

Prepared & submitted by: Checked & Reviewed by

Daniel R. Aguinaldo National High School

KRA 3- OBJECTIVE 9- Selected, developed, organized and used

5 4 9 4.5 7.50% 0.3375

Daniel R. Aguinaldo National High School

Rating Quality Efficiency

Designed, selected, organized & used

Designed, selected, organized & used

Designed, selected, organized & used

Designed, selected, organized & used

Prepared & submitted by: Checked & Reviewed by

Daniel R. Aguinaldo National High School

KRA 4 - OBJECTIVE 11- Monitored and evaluated learner progress and

Rating Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Frequently monitored & evaluated Submitted MOV were

Occasionally monitored & evaluated Submitted MOV were

Rarely monitored & evaluated learner Submitted MOV were

1 no evidence no evidence no evidence

Prepared & submitted by: Checked & Reviewed by

Teacher ______ Head Teacher ____- _____

Daniel R. Aguinaldo National High School

Rating Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Frequently showed prompt & clear Submitted MOV were

Occasionally showed prompt & clear Submitted MOV were

Rarely showed prompt & clear Submitted MOV were

1 no evidence no evidence no evidence

Prepared & submitted by: Checked & Reviewed by

Teacher ______ Head Teacher ____- _____

Teacher _ Head Teacher

Teacher _ Head Teacher

Teacher _ Head Teacher

Teacher __ Head Teacher - _

Teacher __ Head Teacher - _

Teacher __ Head Teacher - _

Teacher Head Teacher - _

Teacher Head Teacher - ____

Master Teacher Head Teacher - _____

Teacher Head Teacher - ____

Teacher Head Teacher - ____

Teacher Head Teacher - ____

Master Teacher Head Teacher - _______

Teacher Head Teacher - ____

Master Teacher Head Teacher - ___________