Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1989-1995
Key Concepts
Security
According to A. Wolfers: objective sense: absence of threats aimed at core values
Subjective sense: absence of fear that such values would be
attacked
National Security
It represents the ability to preserve the nation’s integrity, territory and institutions
from external and internal disruptions while also controlling its borders.
According to Lipmann: a state’s security is reinforced when it does not have to
sacrifice its interests to avoid conflict while being able to maintain them when
challenged.
National Interest
It consists of the amalgam of a country’s agenda encompassing economic, political,
social, military or cultural goals.
International Security
The concept refers to the attempts of the international actors to ensure a safe global
environment where mutual survival is their core goal.
Security Strategy
It represents the attempts of a state in elaborating the main security goals and outline
the major security concerns while also deciding upon the necessary means in
accomplishing the state’s security agenda and dealing with security threats.
The Ministry of Internal Affairs of Romania is one of the fifteen ministries of the
Government of Romania. From 23 August 1944 to 18 March 1975 the minister held the
title of Minister of Internal Affairs, between 2004 and 2007, held the title of Minister
of Administration and Interior, and since April 2007, Minister of Interior and
Administrative Reform. In December 2008, the Boc government changed the name
back to Ministry of Administration and Interior.
The Ministry of Justice of Romania is one of the ministries of the Romanian
Government. It administers the judicial system.
The Supreme Council of National Defence (Consiliul Suprem de Apărare a Ţării;
acronym: CSAT) is the autonomous administrative authority in Romania, invested by
the Constitution with the task of organizing coordinating, in a unitary fashion, the
activities related to the defence of the country and national security.
Their major impact on strategic decision-making is to maintain the identity, continuity and
development of the Romanian State so that it becomes the factor of democratic stability inside
the country and on the entire continent. These national organs were activating in order to protect
and serve the security of Romania; they diminished any kind of negative impact, especially in
that period.
Crucially, the major factor which could be credited for creating instability was the process of
transition from the old to the new order of European and international security.
Nevertheless, despite all the risks and threats Romania was facing at that time, its future
predicted a lot of opportunities and advantages.
The creation of institutions such as SRI, SIE and SPP started to encourage the
maintenance of the Romanian security – national security (SRI), obtaining information from
outside the country for the national security (SIE) or the protection of the Romanian and
foreign officials (SPP).
After 1994, Romania was to become a factor of democratic stability, and therefore all
the states would become equal partners in the process of stability and integration of the whole
continent.
NATO played a very important role in the Romanian security – the “Partnership for
Peace” project being a major initiative and an important step that NATO took towards a
European security system.
Romania will actively cooperate with European organizations and institutions such as
the EU, the European Council, NATO or the UN, working towards the insurance of peace
and prosperity.
Romania will also develop collaboration reports and friendship with the states next to
it, the states belonging to the “Partnership for Peace, to speed up the process of creating an
European security system.
Another important opportunity that Romania was about to face was the participation
with its military personnel at the UN to maintain peace.
The intensification of the multilateral relations Romania has with the Republic of
Moldova, their process of economic, legislative and cultural integration are meant to
contribute towards the innate links between the two Romanian states – a wish that is to be
fulfilled even nowadays.
– In order to discuss the national interest of a country, we should firstly define it.
– National Interest: a fundamental concept in our foreign policy orientation,
representing the central stream in diplomacy. We are not talking only about a certain
interest, but an amount of interests contributing to the enforcement of security on the
one hand and welfare, on the other hand. Samuel Huntington: „national interest is a
public good that concerns all of us...combining security with material needs, moral
and ethical ones”.
– After 1989, Romania witnessed a great sense of relief as the country emerged from
under a communist rule. Still, the country was dominated by uncertainty, fear and
instability after events such as the Mineriades of 1990 and 1991. The citizens were
willing to return to the European family and reduce the gaps between our country and
the West.
– Fundamenal national interests: a long-term development of Romania, in conditions of
stabilty, as a pillar for consolidating a free society; our development as a national,
unitary, sovereign, indepedent and indivizible state, by consolidating the State of Law
and social stability; development of a dynamic and competitive market economy, as a
basis of attaining our general welfare; assuring the prosperity of Romanian society, in
order to allow a proper functioning of a social protection system; full exercise of the
basic rights and liberties, stipulated by our Constitution; the development of culture
and spiritual life in accordance with the traditional values; environment protection;
affirmation of the state as a regional factor of stabilty and its contribution to a
worldwide peace climate.
– In order to reach our national interests, there is a need for consolidating (from a
structural and functional point of view) of the constitutional framework of the state,
public institutions, central and local authorities, social and political pluralism. Also,
the efficiency of the economical and structural reform and the reduction of the
transition period are key-points. Strengthening our relationships with the Western
democratized states and their institutions would create a favorable framework for
promoting our national interests. Modernizing the military assets, necessary as
Romania maight face some situations of instability and conflict in the region;
transpose the Peace Partnership into practice.
– Main objectives: accession to NATO and the European Union, resulting in the
creation of an European security and collective defense system. Some progress made
in the political domain, still not enough in the economical one, law enforcement or
human rights. Accession delayed for 2004, respectively 2007. All in all, Romania
targeting the integration in the Euro-Atlantic structures, continue its Western road and
distance itself from Russia.
If we are to look at the act from 1994, it clearly makes reference to the instability of states
and borders as an external threatening factor for Romania. The act refers specifically to the
situation in Yugoslavia, a situation that might have proven threatening if it were to expand to
our country as part of a strategy to weaken the Balkan area. Its strategies also took into
consideration certain factors that had been caused by previous events, such as a potential
huge income of refugees and economic consequences due to interrupted relationships with
states we had previously partnered. Also, in drafting its strategies, Romania took into
consideration the activities and decisions of CFE, UEO, NATO, CSCE and ONU.
Brief description of the named organization;
Comparison between 1994’s act and the decree of NATO regarding the four security
dimensions;
The desire to be an integrated part of the European Union had a huge impact for our
country in which the leadership or the decision making power went from too few (one party)
to the many (numerous parties with clashing ideas) and as such they looked for guidance to
the European policies.
What other policy options can you identify for Romania during this period? Would they
have proven more profitable?
Events of different kinds shape the world that we live in and although they have
different degrees of predictability, it would be hard to foresee and adapt the security strategy
in order to have the desired outcome. Seeing as the number of factors that influence a state’s
trajectory is impossible to estimate it would also be impossible to tell if another choice would
have bettered Romania as a state.
Relevant statements that define Romania’s options; e.g. Alexey Makarin
(Center for Political Technologies in Moscow) : “in this situation, Russia has a
window of opportunity. Unlike the EU, with its antagonisms between member
states, Russia exerts a single political will, Russia provides lucrative and
concrete economic project to its neighbours, not mere hopes for integration in
a distant future” .