Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1
J.Pavithra , 2K.P.Thooyamani, 3Kermiki Dkhar
1
Assistant Professor, 2Associate Professor, 3Student
Department of Management Studies, BIST, BIHER, Bharath University, Chennai.
1
pavithra.mba@bharathuniv.ac.in
189
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
CEMENTS PVT LTD. liabilities is made. From the above table analysis, we
o
To analyze the consumption of numerous assets can identify that the year 2011-12 only have the current
during the period. ratio above the standard norms i.e 2.09%. The
o
To know the overall profitability position of remaining all the years the current ratio is below 2:1
JEPPIAAR CEMENTS PVT LTD.
o 4.2 Quick Ratio
To compare the balance sheet and income
statements of the company. Quick ratio can be defined as the relationship between
o
To find out the trend of financial analysis of past quick/liquid assets and current or liquid liabilities. If
five year using trend analysis. the asset can be converted into cash with a short period
o
To offer the suggestions to improve the without a loss of value it is said to be liquid. It
company’s performance. calculates the firm’s capacity to payoff the current
duties immediately.Quick Ratio = Liquid Assets/
3. Scope Of The Study
Currentliabilities
The study entitled “A study on the financial
Interpretation
performance of JEPPIAAR CEMENTS PVT LTD” is
to analyze the financial performance of JEPPIAAR The ratio 1:1 is measured ideal ratio for a concern
CEMENTS PVT LTD for the last 5 years. because it is good to keep the liquid assets at least equal
The study is based on the financial position of the firm to the liquid liabilities at all items. Here from 2009-
by using Ratio analysis, Trend analysis and 13every year the ratios are satisfying the standard
Comparative statements. Financial statements help the norms of quick ratio I.e around 1. And it is good for
management to analyze profit, solvency, liquidity and company.
efficiency etc. this analysis will give the exact picture 4.3 Absolute Liquid Ratio
of the company. These studies will also help the
management to take managerial decisions. These Even though receivables are generally more liquid than
studies help the management to understand the new inventories, there may be debts having doubt
possibilities. concerning their real stability in time. This ratio is also
The study helps us to conduct researches in financial called as super quick ratio. This ratio reflects only the
areas and it also helps us for taking financial Decisions absolute liquidity obtainable with the firm. If the super
In Personal Life. liquid assets are too much relative to the current
liabilities then it may affect the profitability of the firm.
4. Limitation Of The Study
Absolute Liquidity Ratio = Absolute Liquidity Asset
The study based on historical data, so it cannot be / Current Liabilities
reliable.
The study has been carried out for the period of Interpretation
five years and it is not sufficient enough to analyze the The desirable norm for the ratio is the1:2 i.e., Re 1
entire aspect of the company.
The result of the study cannot be generalized for value of absolute liquid assets are adequate for Rs. 2
other organization and we cannot predict future value of current liabilities. Even though the ratio gives
financial position of the company based on the study a more meaningful measure of liquidity, it is not much
Change in the book keeping procedures by a firm use because the idea of keeping large cash balance or
may often mislead the financial analysis. near cash items has long since been disproved. Cash
The changes in the price level is not considered. balance yields no return and such is barren.
4.1 Data Analysis And InterpretationRatio Analysis Gross Profit Ratio= Gross Profit/Net Sales X 100
Current Ratio Interpretation
This ratio can be defined as “the relationship between There is no average norm for gross profit ratio and that
current assets and current liabilities”. This is the most may vary from business to business. It reflects the
widely used ratio. It shows the firm’s capability to effectiveness with which a firm produces its products.
cover its current liabilities with its current assets. It is better when the ratio is higher. A lower ratio
Interpretation indicates unfavorable trend in the form of deduction in
selling prices not accompanied by balanced decrease in
Generally the ratio of 2:1 is considered for a concern, cost of goods sold or increase in cost of production.
i.e., the current assets must be twice of the current Here in the last year i.e. 2012-13 it increased and
liabilities. If these current assets are the two times of become positive. The ratio is 63.46. It is very good for
the current liabilities, there will be no opposing effect the company.
on business operation when the payment of the current
190
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
Increase /
Particulars 2012 2013 % of change
Decrease
Cost of
goods
40664 49608 8944 21.99
Sold
Gross profit 70056 82540 12484 17.8
Interpretation
Here the sale is increased by 19.35%. The gross profit here is increased by 17.8% and the price of goods sold are
large related to last year so the company facing difficulty. Finally, Over all it is a profitable situation.
191
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
192
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
193
194