Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Megan Antill
Professor Calhoun
ENG 1201.519
23 March 2019
As time goes on, evidence continues to pile up that it will benefit students to get
more sleep each night. The question of whether or not the start time of school should be
pushed back has been debated for years. Will an extra hour of sleep really make that
big of a difference? Is it worth the money and resources schools will have to provide to
make this new schedule work? The answer to these questions is yes. The overall
health, motivation, focus, and behavior of students improves with just an extra hour of
sleep. By pushing back the start time of school, students will benefit academically and
personally.
While more can be done to improve the start times of schools, some changes
have already been made. So far, schools in 45 states have pushed back the start time.
These schools report less stress for the students, as well as the teachers. Teachers
also inform that students are doing just as well, or better, in their classes with the start
time change. The main difference is that there is less stress for everyone involved.
While implementing this policy of later start times is said to cost the U.S. economy $83
billion over the next ten years, Marco Hafner, lead author of research published by the
RAND Corporation and RAND Europe, says that the hassle will be worth it. By enforcing
the later start time policy, there is a significant decrease in health concerns, such as
Antill 2
rates of obesity and car crashes, due to sleeplessness. Along with this, there is also a
An essential question on this topic is, would pushing back the start time help
students with their academics? Multiple studies and trials have been conducted to prove
that it will. In an article called, “19 Should Start School Later in The Morning Pros and
Cons,” a list of pros and cons is provided. The author mentions that in 1998, Dr. Amy
Professor of Psychiatry and Human Behavior at the Warren Alpert Medical School of
Brown University, found that students with grade averages of a C or under were getting
25 minutes less sleep than those with higher grade averages (Ayres). While 25 minutes
may not seem like a long amount of time to catch up on some sleep, for the students, it
also found that lack of sleep has the ability to, “Limit your ability to learn, listen,
concentrate and solve problems. You may even forget important information like names,
numbers, your homework…” (Sleep for Teenagers). If the ability to learn, listen,
concentrate, and solve problems is limited with less sleep, attending school would not
be same as it would be with a full ten hours of sleep the night before.
An additional study reported in the article, “Teens get more sleep, show improved
grades and attendance with later school start time researchers find,” written by James
Urton, tells of a study conducted in which two separate groups of sophomores were
examined on their sleeping patterns in correlation with their grades, before and after the
start time of school was pushed back. These 92 students were all enrolled in a biology
Antill 3
class, in which the final grades were 4.5% higher for the students who took the class
The Journal of Human Resources also released a passage concerning this topic
that shared similar results. The two authors stated, “... we find that moving start times
one hour later relative to sunrise increases test scores by .08 and .06 standard
deviations for adolescents in math and reading, respectively,” (Heissel and Norris). By
moving the start time back, students are able to focus more in the earlier classes, where
they used to drift off and become confused on the subject at hand. Kyla L. Wahlstrom
and her team found, through research on a school in Minnesota, that the later the start
Connecticut State University, and her colleague, Linda Clark found that the attendance
and graduation rates had both gone up significantly. The study was conducted within 29
schools, all of which pushed back the start times of school. The befores and afters of
graduation and attendance rates were compared and contrasted. The results being that
with the original start times average attendance rate was approximately 90%. After the
change in start time, the average attendance rate was approximately 94%. The results
also showed that the average graduation rate had also risen, from 79% to 88%
(Malatesta). While this information was crucial to the study, the question of whether or
not these results were due to student’s increase in sleep was still under investigation.
The conductors of the study relied on background information from another study, which
Antill 4
involved the use of wrist monitors in order to establish that the students were still going
to bed at the same time and waking up at the later start time. In a year-long study Kyla
L. Wahlstrom examined student data by school and by grade level. After collecting all of
the necessary data she states, “We found significant decreases in absences and
tardiness in all grades 9-12 in the school districts that had instituted the latest school
start times of 8:35 and 8:55 a.m. — in one district, there was a 66% drop in tardiness.”
Overall, with the start time being pushed back attendance and graduation rates
improved.
Researchers have found that 73% of students across 30 states within the U.S.
are not getting enough sleep (eight to ten hours). This number has increased since the
same study was conducted in 2009. With lack of sleep comes behavioral changes. Dr.
Medical Center, found that for students who do not obtain enough sleep there could be,
“...problems regulating the ups and downs in their moods, leading to wider and more
rapid reactions to relatively minor events. Children who don’t get enough sleep also
don’t pay attention as well, are less likely to think before they act, and don’t seem able
to solve problems as well,” (Sleep problems may affect children’s behavior). Within this
same article, Dr. Jodie Mindell, Associate Director at the Sleep Center at the Children’s
Hospital of Philadelphia, tells the reader that children who do not get a sufficient night of
sleep are more prone to be overactive, noncompliant, anxious, and more withdrawn.
These issues do not just make the lives of the children more challenging, but also the
Antill 5
lives of their parents. The unpredictable moods, constant changes in attitude, and
inability to comply to simple instruction make the job of a parent that much more difficult.
An article written in The Daily Universe delivered the message of another article
published in the Journal of Nature and Science of Sleep. In this article Dr. Ronald D.
Chervin and Dr. Shelley D. Hershner explain that the, “...consequences of sleep
deprivation and daytime sleepiness ... can result in lower grade point averages,
(Meredith). The majority of schools across the United States begin school before 8:30
a.m. Because the start of student’s days begins so early, they are more likely to have
With sleep deprivation comes a long list of side effects. An organization that
explains this thoroughly is the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. An article on
their online site states that teenagers aged 13-18 who are not getting enough sleep are
more prone to be overweight, neglect daily physical activity, suffer from symptoms of
depression, engage in unhealthy risk behaviors, and perform poorly in school (Schools
Start Too Early). All of these factors could play negatively into the rest of student’s lives.
Furthermore, one of these factors, engaging in unhealthy risk behaviors was reported
by multiple sources. Elizabeth Malatesta, writer for NeaToday, also points out that
insufficient sleep in teens leads to, “an increase in car accidents, substance abuse,
suicide attempts, depression, even criminal activity.” So not only would changing the
start time of school to a later time affect the sleep schedule of the students, it could also
help prevent something dangerous from occurring in and out of the mind.
Antill 6
A common argument to pushing the school start time back is, will the students
take advantage of the extra time by sleeping or will they choose to stay up later playing
video games and watching Netflix? While this is not a completely unreasonable
assumption, further studies show that teenagers may deserve more credit than this. A
paper, published in the journal Science Advances, records results researchers at the
University of Washington and the Salk Institute for Biological Studies found. Instead of
relying on the self-reported sleeping patterns from students, wrist monitors were used to
track the amount of sleep the students were getting before and after the change in start
time. Before the change in start time had been implemented, the median amount of
sleep the students were getting each night was about six hours and fifty minutes. After
the start time had been pushed back an hour, the median amount of sleep the students
were getting was about seven hours and twenty-four minutes each night (Urton). Other
than the fact that the wrist monitors showed that the students were sleeping for this
extra hour, they also showed something researchers were not expecting. The study
revealed that the students were not going to bed later, just waking up later. It also
revealed that the wake up time on weekdays and weekends began moving closer
Another great obstacle when it comes to pushing back the start time of school is
the issue of transportation. The high cost to change the school start time stems from the
bussing. Busses have a carefully mapped out schedule, that for most school districts
has been lined up for a long time. The cost to hire new bus drivers and redesign routes
for the busses to take is a high one. However, the National Sleep Foundation found a
Antill 7
solution to this problem that includes, “ ... flipping start times, most commonly
elementary with high school. This solution requires no extra buses or drivers, just a
change in the order of pickups. This schedule also seems to be more appropriate to
elementary school students’ sleep schedules, because young children tend to wake up
earlier in the morning,” (Delaying School Start Times). By finding solutions to problems
like this, steps can be taken to make pushing the start time of school work for everyone.
overall mood and behavior on students at a school who had decided to move the start
time of school from 7:20 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. She, herself had been a school official for
some time and was skeptical about moving the start time, since she had never heard of
the effects that lack of sleep could have on the adolescent brain. She and a group of
District. Early on she states that evidence quickly began piling up. The principal of the
school commented that, “Students were now awake the first hour of class… fewer
disciplinary incidents in the halls and lunchroom, and students reported less depression
and feelings of greater efficacy. Over 92% of the parents said their kids were ‘easier to
live with,’”(Wahlstrom). With students feeling happier to be at school, this in turn made
explaining the school start times affect students outside of the United States, specifically
limited to six and a half hours of sleep each night for five nights. These students were
Antill 8
then asked to perform in a classroom setting in the same manner they typically would.
When compared with the students who received ten hours of sleep each night for five
nights, the results showed that the students were significantly less attentive. More
specifically, the students with six and a half hours of sleep experienced reduced
attentive behavior, diminished learning, and lowered arousal within the simulated
classroom (Vedaa). Therefore, there is a direct correlation with the amount of time spent
asleep and how much students participate and pay attention in class. When students
are able to get a better nights sleep, they are able to focus on what is being taught in
class. With less issues in the classroom and with the students, there is more time for
learning.
Wahlstrom also reports that due to the results of the national Youth Risk
Behavior Survey she concludes that when teenagers get more than eight hours of
sleep, they are significantly less likely to engage in at-risk behaviors. Through this data
she was also able to come to the conclusion that, “Cigarette, alcohol, and marijuana use
declined by 8% to 14% when teens slept eight or more hours each night, with
depression and sexual activity also declining by 9% to 11%.” The Sleep Foundation
reinforced this fact by stating a consequence of lack of sleep is that it could, “Lead to
with your teachers or family members,” and it has the ability to, “Heighten the effects of
alcohol and possibly increase use of caffeine and nicotine,” (Sleep for Teenagers).
Therefore, when the start time of school is pushed back to accommodate for this eight
Antill 9
hours of sleep it reduces the likeliness that students will engage in risky or unprovoked
behavior.
Adolescent sleep cycles are also an issue with the early start time of school.
Melatonin, a hormone linked to sleep cycles, does not start to produce in adolescents
until about 11:00 at night. This leaves adolescent students with a limited amount of time
to get any efficient sleep (Malatesta). The National Sleep Foundation found out through
a survey that only 15% of students reported sleeping eight and a half hours of sleep or
more each night. The author of the article also included that, “Many teens suffer from
sleep apnea,” (Sleep for Teenagers). Many of these sleep disorders come from issues
with the sleep cycle of an adolescent. Furthermore, these sleep disorders will lead to
further complications.
Another subject when it comes to this topic that one might not think to examine
further is the statistic of teenage car crashes. Throughout research it was found that on
multiple platforms this was a main issue. 2,700 teenagers die in car crashes each year.
Kyla L. Wahlstrom collected car crash data in five districts from September to May
before and after the start time of school was pushed back. She found once the start
time had been moved to later in the morning, car crashes had decreased by 13%. This
information conveys that sleep-deprived teenagers are not only a danger to themselves,
but anyone else who happens to be driving on that same road. This statistic was so
jurastic that The Sleep Foundation listed as one of the consequences for lack of sleep
that it can, “Contribute to illness, not using equipment safely or driving drowsy,” (Sleep
Antill 10
for Teenagers). By allowing students to get more sleep and have a brighter morning,
these number of car crashes in the morning caused by teenagers was able to decrease.
The issue is that when there is a group of people whose one goal is to go to a
volunteering, team sports, and clubs, this is what their priority becomes. Whether or not
they were able to get a full eight to ten hours of sleep is not what is most important to
them, colleges, are not going to notice. The amount of pressure put on modern students
is one that they do not fail to live up to. If this means waking up for school in the
morning at 6:30 and not getting home from sports or their job until 8:00 p.m., to have
hours of homework ahead, then that is what they will do. With everything that goes on in
their everyday lives, getting a good night's sleep would make all of the difference for
tomorrow when they have to start all over again. By pushing back the start time of
school, they would have additional time to recharge in order to be focussed and
The last question here is why has the start time of school not been pushed back
already? The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Academy of
Pediatrics, and The American Medical Association have all issued policy statements
which say that school should not start any earlier than 8:30 a.m. The results of school
starting before this time are all issues that could impact the entirety of students lives. By
pushing back the start time of school, school districts would be decreasing the amount
the number of students who pay attention and participate in class, increasing overall
Antill 11
chances of sleep deprivation, and increasing grade averages. The simplest way to put it
is, pushing back the start time of school will benefit students greatly. The pros here
Works Cited
Ayres, Crystal. “19 Should School Start Later in the Morning Pros and Cons.”
Vittana.org,
vittana.org/19-should-school-start-later-in-the-morning-pros-and-cons.
Heissel, Jennifer A., and Samuel Norris. “Rise and Shine: The Effect of School Start
doi:10.3368/jhr.53.4.0815-7346R1.
Malatesta, Elizabeth. “Let Them Sleep? Later School Start Times Improve Graduation
2017,neatoday.org/2017/04/13/later-school-start-times/.
Meredith, Karenna. “Health Officials Say Lack of Sleep Can Negatively Affect Students'
universe.byu.edu/2016/09/06/health-officials-say-lack-of-sleep-can-negatively-af
ect-students-grades/.
“Schools Start Too Early | Features | CDC.” Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention,
www.cdc.gov/features/school-start-times/index.html.
www.sleepfoundation.org/articles/teens-and-sleep.
sleepeducation.org/news/2012/10/29/sleep-problems-may-affect-children's-beh
vior.
Urton, James. “Teens Get More Sleep, Show Improved Grades and Attendance with
www.washington.edu/news/2018/12/12/high-school-start-times-study/.
Vedaa, Oystein, et al. “School Start Time, Sleepiness and Functioning in Norwegian
sinclair.ohionet.org:80/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct
true&b=eric&AN=EJ953895&site=eds-live.
Wahlstrom, Kyla L. “Later Start Time for Teens Improves Grades, Mood, and Safety.” \
Weller, Chris. “Schools around the US Are Finally Pushing Back Their Start Times - and
www.businessinsider.com/school-start-times-are-finally-getting-pushed-back-20
7-8.
Antill 14