Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1
THE NATURE OF ACCOUNTING THEORY
APPROACH
2
theory defined as:-
“a set of inter-related constructs (concept), definitions and
propositions (suggestions) that present a systematic view of
phenomena by specifying relations among variables with the
purpose of explaining and predicting phenomena”.
3
The General Acceptance of Accounting Principles
(GAAP) guide the acctg profession to choose acctg
techniques and prepare FS considered to be good
acctg practice.
4
Changes in principles may occur as a result of providing
solutions to emerging accounting problem and
formulating a theoretical framework.
5
Machlup (1955) defined the process:…
6
Therefore, acctg theory should result from both
process of theory construction and verification.
7
APPROACH IN ACCOUNTING THEORY
8
Traditional approaches to accounting
theory
1. Non-theoretical, practical or pragmatic (informal)
2. Theoretical:
a. Deductive approach
b. Inductive approach
c. Ethical approach
d. Sociological approach
e. Economic approach
9
1. Non-theoretical approaches (P&A)
The pragmatic approach:
consists of the construction of a theory that conforms to real-
world practices and suggests practical solutions
10
The authoritarian approach:
The formulation of AT, which is employ primarily by
professional organization, consists of issuing
pronouncements for the regulation of accounting practices
11
Both approach assume AT (pragmatic & authoritarian) & the
resulting technique must be predicted on the basis ultimate
use of financial reports, if accounting is to have useful
function.
12
However;
The approaches have been largely unsuccessful in reaching
satisfactory conclusions in their attempt to construct an AT.
13
2. The Deductive Approach
Constructions of AT theory begins with basic propositions &
proceeds to derive logical conclusions about the subject
under considerations.
14
Steps used to derive the deductive approach
1. Specifying the objectives of financial statements
2. Selecting the ‘postulates’ of accounting
3. Deriving the ‘principles’ of accounting
4. Developing the ‘techniques’ of accounting
15
3. The Inductive Approach
The construction of theory begins with observations &
measurements & moves toward generalized conclusions.
16
Involved four stages, i.e. :-
1. Recording all observations
2. Analysing and classifying these observations to
detect recurring relationships
3. Inductive derivation of generalisations and
principles of accounting from observations that
depict recurring relationships
4. Testing the generalisations
17
Comparing deductive and inductive
approaches
In the inductive approach, the truth or falsity of the propositions does not
depend on other propositions, but must be empirically verified
19
4. The Ethical Approach
The basic core consists of the concepts of fairness, justice,
equity and truth
In general, the concept of fairness implies that accounting
statements have not been subject to undue influence or bias
Justice; equitable treatment of all interested parties
Truth; with true & accurate accounting without
misreprsentation
20
For example:
The committee on auditing procedures refers to concept of
‘fairness of presentation’ as:
1. conformity with GAAP
2. disclosure
3. consistency
4. comparability
21
5. The Sociological Approach
22
Evolution to new accounting sub discipline, socioeconomic
accounting
The main obj encourage business to account their impact on
business activities on social environment through
measurement, internalization, & disclosure in their FS.
Probably play a major role in future formulation of AT.
23
6. The Economic Approach
Emphasizes controlling the behavior of
macroeconomic indicators that result from the
adoption of various accounting techniques
The choice of different accounting techniques
depends on their impact on the national economic
good
Accounting policies and techniques should reflect
‘economic reality’, and the choice of accounting
techniques should depend on ‘economic
consequences’
e.g. LIFO method during continuing inflation
period
24
The Eclectic (combination) Approach to the Formulation of
Accounting Theory
25
Continue to second approach……..
26
The Regulatory Approach
27
Acctg standards dominate accountant’s work.
They provide practical & handy rules for the conduct of the
accountant’s work.
28
Accounting standards usually consist of three parts:
1. a description of the problem to be tackled
2. a reasoned discussion on ways of solving the problem, then,
3. in line with the decision or theory, the prescribed solution
29
Why Examine Theories of Regulation
Better placed to understand why some accounting
prescriptions become part of legislation while others do not
30
Theories to Explain Regulation
Public interest theory
Capture theory
31
To be continue……………………
32
1.Public Interest Theory
Regulation put in place to benefit society as a whole rather
than vested interests
33
Criticisms of Public Interest Theory
Critics question assumptions that economic markets operate
inefficiently if unregulated
34
The regulated seeks to take charge (capture) the regulator
seek to ensure rules subsequently released are advantageous
to the parties subject to regulation
although regulating initially in the public interest, difficult for
regulator to remain independent
35
2. Capture of Accounting Standard-
Setting
Walker (1987) analysed capture of Australian standard-setting
through the ASRB. Argued that:
the accounting profession lobbied before the board
established to ensure no independent research capability,
no academic as chair, to receive admin officer not a
research director
priorities only set after consultation with AARF
ASRB fast-tracked AARF submissions but not others
majority of board membership were members of the
accounting profession
36
Criticisms of Capture Theory
No reason to suggest that regulated industry the only
interest group able to influence the regulator
No reason why regulated industries only able to
capture existing agencies rather than procure the
creation of an agency
No reason why regulated couldn’t prevent creation of
the regulatory agency
37
3. Economic Interest Group Theory
Assumes groups will form to protect particular
economic interests
groups are often in conflict with each other and will
lobby government to put in place legislation which will
benefit them at the expense of others
no notion of public interest inherent in the theory
regulators (and all other individuals) deemed to be
motivated by self interest
38
Economic Interest Group Theory –
cont….
The regulator is not a neutral arbiter but is seen as
an interest group itself
regulator motivated to ensure re-election or
maintenance of its position of power
regulation serves the private interests of politically
effective groups
those groups with insufficient power will not be able to
effectively lobby for regulation to protect its own
interests
39
Examples - Application to Accounting Standard-
setting
Industry groups may lobby to accept or reject a particular
accounting standard
eg. insurance oil & gas industry
large politically sensitive firms found to lobby in favour of
general price level accounting in US (led to reduced profits)
accounting firms lobbying to protect their own interests
40
Accounting Regulation as an output
of a Political Process
The view that financial accounting should be objective,
neutral and apolitical can be challenged
will inevitably be political as it affects wealth distribution
within society
standard-setters encourage affected parties to make
submissions on drafts of proposed standards
41
If standard-setters give consideration to views in submissions,
accounting standards and therefore financial reports are the
result of various social and environmental considerations
tied to the values, norms and expectations of the society in
which standards are developed
questionable whether financial accounting can claim to be
neutral and objective
42
Compliance with accounting standards usually seen to
indicate financial statements are ‘true and fair’ ???
can accounts based upon standards determined from various
economic and social consequences be deemed to be ‘true’?
Users may not be aware that financial reports are the
outcome of various political pressures
should regulators consider preparers’ views given that
standards are designed to limit what preparers do?
43
Influence of the Accounting Profession on
Standards
Standards that do not have support from accountants and/or the
business community could result in:
1. lobbying by particular interest groups
2. non-compliance
3. refusal of companies to contribute to or participate in the standard-setting
process
4. threat of governmental regulatory intervention
44
Private-sector Regulation of Accounting
Standards
Advantages
The AASB is responsive to various constituents
The AASB attracts as members people who possess the
necessary technical knowledge to develop and implement
alternative measurement and disclosure systems
The AASB is successful in generating a reasonable amount of
response from its constituency base and in responding to this
input
45
Disadvantages
The AASB lacks statutory authority and faces the challenge of
being overridden by government
The AASB has been accused of lacking independence from
dominating interests, such as the accounting profession
The AASB has often been accused of responding too slowly to
major issues that are of crucial importance to some of its
constituents
46
Arguments in favour:
The ASIC acts as ‘creative irritant’ and as a catalyst for change,
since the private sector and market forces do not provide the
leadership necessary to effect such change
The structure of securities regulation established by the 1991
Corporations Law serves to protect investors against perceived
abuses
47
The ASIC is motivated by the desire to create a level of public
disclosure deemed necessary and adequate for decision
making
Unlike the AASB, the ASIC is secured greater legitimacy
through its statutory authority
Private-sector objectives may sometimes contradict the public
interest.
48
Arguments against:
There is a high corporate cost for compliance with
government regulation of information
Bureaucrats have a tendency to maximise the total budget of
their bureau
There is the danger that standard setting may become
increasingly politicised
Government regulation backed by police power may hinder
the conduct of research and experimentation of accounting
policy and is not essential to achieving standardisation of
measurement
49
Accounting Standards Overload
Too many standards
Too detailed standards
No rigid standards, making selective application difficult
General-purpose standards fail to provide for differences in preparers’,
users’ and CPA’s needs
General-purpose standards fail to provide for differences between:
public and non-public entities
annual and interim financial statements
large and small enterprises
credited and non-audited financial statements
Excessive disclosures and/or complex measurements
50
Effects of Accounting Standards
Overload
Accountants may lose sight of their real jobs because of the
excessive data required to comply with standards
Audit failures may result because the accountant may forget to
perform basic audit procedures
The proliferation of complex accounting regulations may lead to
non-compliance
51
Solutions to the Standards Overload
Problem
52
• a change in CPAs’ standards for reporting on financial statements
• an alternative to the GAAP as an optional basis for presenting
financial statements
53
The Positive Approach
54
The subject matter of positive approach is:
existing accounting practices
management’s attitudes towards those practices
Proponents of the positive approach argue that the techniques can
be derived from and justified on the basis of their tested use, or
that management plays a central role in determining the techniques
to be implemented
55
• Basic subject matter:
– information is an economic commodity
– acquisition of information amounts to a problem of economic
choice
• Accounting information is evaluated in terms of its
ability to improve the quality of the optimal choice in a
basic-choice problem that must be resolved by an
individual
• The information system with the highest expected
utility is preferred
56
Positive theory of accounting
The positive theory of accounting is based on the
propositions that managers, shareholders and
regulators/politicians are rational and attempt to maximize
their utility
Their choice of accounting policy rests on comparing the
relative costs and benefits of alternative accounting
procedures so as to maximize their utility
57
We move to third approach……..PAT
58
The central ideal of the positive
approach
1. To enhance the reliability of prediction, based on the
observed smoothed series of accounting numbers
along a trend considered best or normal by
management
2. To reduce the uncertainty resulting from the
fluctuations of income numbers in general and the
reduction of systematic risk in particular by
reducing the covariance of the firm’s returns with
market returns
59
The central problem in positive
theories
• The central problem is to determine how accounting
procedures affect cash flows, and therefore management’s
utility
• Theoretical assumptions guiding resolution of the problem
are:
– the agency theory evolves to a view of the firm as a ‘nexus of
contracts’
– given this ‘nexus of contracts’ perspective, the role of accounting
information is to monitor and enforce these contracts to reduce the
agency costs of certain conflicts of interest
60
The agency problem (dominant theory in positive
approach)
61
4. the description of the feasible set of actions from which
the agent chooses
5. the description of the labour and capital markets
6. the description of the feasible set of information
systems
7. the description of the legal system that specifies the
type of behavior that can be legally enforced, and what
is admissible evidence
8. the description of the feasible set of payment systems
62
9. the description of the solution to the basic agency
model
10. the role of self-interest
11. the solution concept and the nature of optimality
63
Income smoothing
Propositions on income smoothing
1. The criterion a corporate management uses to select
among accounting principles is the maximisation of its
utility or welfare
2. The utility (effectiveness) of management increases with:
job security
the level and rate of growth in management’s
income
the level and rate of growth in the corporation’s size
64
3. The achievement of the management goals stated in
proposition to depends in part on the stockholders’
satisfaction with the corporation’s performance
4. Stockholders’ satisfaction increases with the average rate of
growth in the corporation’s income
65
Gordon’s Theorem
66
Motivations for smoothing
According to Heyworth, motivations for smoothing
include improvements of relations with creditors,
investors and workers, as well as dampening of business
cycles through psychological processes
Beidelman’s two motivating reasons:
1. a stable earnings stream is capable of supporting a higher
level of dividends, having a favourable effect on the value of
the firm’s shares
2. smoothing counters the cyclical nature of reported earnings
and reduces the correlation of a firm’s expected returns with
returns on the market portfolio
67
Constraints leading to smoothing
Three constraints are presumed to lead managers to
smooth:
1. the competitive market mechanisms, which reduce options
available to management
2. the management compensation scheme, which is linked
directly to the firm’s performance
3. the threat of management displacement
68
Dimensions of smoothing
Barnea and others distinguished between three
dimensions:
1. smoothing through events’ occurrence and/or recognition
2. smoothing through allocation over time
3. smoothing through classification
69
The accounting choice
70
The accounting choice (cont’d)
71
We have finished
1. Non theoretical approach
2. Regulatory Approach
3. Positive Accounting Theory
4. ………………………………
72
The Behavioural Approach
73
Most traditional approaches accounting theory construction
have failed to consider user behavior in particular and
behavioral assumptions in general
74
A new multidisciplinary area in the field of accounting
has been conveniently labeled ‘behavioral accounting’
75
Behavioural effects of accounting
information
A more recent and exhaustive attempt by Dyckman, Gibbins
and Swieringa illustrates the nature of studies of the
behavioral effects of accounting information
76
(1) Adequacy of disclosure
Three approaches were used to examine the adequacy of
disclosure:
1. the first examined the patterns of use of data from the
viewpoint of resolving controversial issues concerning the
inclusion of certain information
2. the second examined the perceptions and attitudes of different
interest groups
3. the third examined the extent to which different information
items were disclosed in annual reports and the determinants of
any significant differences in the adequacy of financial
disclosure among companies
77
The research on disclosure adequacy and use showed:
general acceptance of the adequacy among financial statements
recognition that the differences in disclosure adequacy among
financial statements are due to such variables as company size,
profitability, and size and listing status of the auditing firm
78
(2) The usefulness of financial statement data
Two approaches were used to examine the usefulness of
financial statement data:
1. the first examined the relative importance of the investment
analysis of different information items to both users and
preparers of financial information
2. the second examined the relevance of financial statements to
decision-making, based on laboratory communication of
financial statement data in terms of readability and meaning to
users in general
79
The overall conclusions of these studies were
that:
some consensus (agreement) exists between users and
preparers regarding the relative importance of the
information items disclosed in financial statements
users do not rely solely on financial statements when
making their decisions
80
(3) Attitudes about corporate reporting
practices
Two approaches were used to examine attitudes about corporate
reporting practices:
1. the first examined preferences for alternative accounting
techniques
2. the second examined attitudes about general reporting issues,
such as how much information should be available, how much
information is available, and the importance of certain items
81
These research items showed the extent to which some
accounting techniques proposed by the authoritative bodies
are accepted, and also brought to light some attitude (stance)
differences among professional groups concerning reporting
issues
82
(4) Materiality judgments
Two approaches were used to examine materiality
judgments
1. the first examined the main factors determining the
collection, classification and summarisation of accounting
data
2. the second focused on what items people consider to be
material, and sought to determine the degree of
difference in accounting data that is required before the
difference is perceived as material
These studies indicated that several factors appear to
affect materiality judgements, and that these
judgements differ among individuals
83
(5) Linguistic effects of accounting data
and techniques
Linguistics and accounting have many similarities
Belkaoui argues that accounting is a language and that
according to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis its lexical
(relating to words) characteristics and grammatical rules will
affect both the linguistic and the non-linguistic
behavior of users
84
Linguistic effects of accounting data and techniques
(cont’d)
85
Linguistic effects of accounting data and techniques (cont’d)
86
Reasons for cross-cultural research
Cross-cultural research is needed in
accounting for the following five reasons:
1. it would establish the boundary conditions for
accounting models and theories
2. it would enable evaluation of the impact of
cultural and ecological factors on behaviour in
accounting
87
Reasons for cross-cultural research (cont’d)
88
Last…….combined any 1 to 4……
89
Accounting Paradigms
A paradigm is a fundamental image of the subject matter of
science.
101
As a conclusion;
No single governing theory of acctg is rich enough to
encompass the full range of user-environment specifications
effectively;
102
To test the theory, according to Propper;
1. Internal consistency
2. Logical form (empirical or scientific theory)
3. Survive of various test
4. Demands from practice
103
END OF CHAPTER ONE
104