Kim Jong-un sets conditions after Trump

suggests third summit

 US needs to ‘stop its current way of calculation’
 Trump repeats demand to relinquish nuclear weapons

Reuters

Sat 13 Apr 2019 13.37 BSTFirst published on Sat 13 Apr 2019 02.39 BST





Shares
357

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un said the failed Hanoi summit make him wonder if the US
was genuine about improving ties. Photograph: 朝鮮通信社/AP

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un is interested in meeting Donald Trump again only
if the US comes to talks with the right attitude, state media said on Saturday, after
the US president floated the idea.

The art of no deal: how Trump and Kim misread

each other
Read more

In return, Trump offered familiar praise of the North Korean dictator and said his
country could expect “extraordinary growth, economic success and riches” under his
leadership… if it relinquished its nuclear weapons.

Trump and Kim have met twice, in Hanoi in February and Singapore last June,
building goodwill but failing to agree on a deal to lift sanctions in exchange for North
Korea abandoning its nuclear and missile programs.
Trump said on Thursday he was open to meeting Kim again, but in a speech on
Friday the North Korean leader said the outcome in Hanoi had forced him to
question the strategy he embraced last year, of international engagement and
economic development.

Kim said the breakdown in talks with the US had raised the risks of returning to past
tensions, and that he would wait “until the end of this year” for the US to decide,
according to state news agency KCNA.

“What is needed is for the US to stop its current way of calculation, and come to us
with a new calculation,” Kim said in a speech to the Supreme People’s Assembly on
Friday, KCNA said.

“The second DPRK-US summit in Hanoi in February raised strong questions about
whether the steps we took under our strategic decision were right, and gave us a
sense of caution about whether the US is even really trying to improve the DPRK-US
relationship,” Kim said, using the initials of North Korea’s full name, the Democratic
People’s Republic of Korea.

In Hanoi, the US came with “completely unrealisable plans” and was “not really
ready to sit with us face-to-face and solve the problem”, Kim said. “By that sort of
thinking, the US will not be able to move us one iota even if they sat with us a
hundred, thousand times, and will not be able to get what it wants at all.”

The latest major Trump resignations and firings

Read more

Kim said his personal relationship with Trump is still good, but that he had no
interest in a third summit if it is a repeat of Hanoi.

“The US said recently that it is thinking again of a third DPRK-US summit and have
been strongly implying problem-solving through dialogue,” he continued. “But they
continue to ignore the basic way of the new DPRK-US relations, including
withdrawing hostile policies, and mistakenly believe that if they pressure us to the
maximum, they can subdue us.”

At a summit with South Korean president Moon in Washington on Thursday, Trump

said Washington would leave sanctions in place on Pyongyang. Last month, a senior
North Korean official warned that Kim might rethink a moratorium on missile
launches and nuclear tests in place since 2017 unless Washington makes concessions
such as easing sanctions.

On Saturday morning, Trump tweeted his thoughts.

“I agree with Kim Jong-un of North Korea that our personal relationship remains
very good, perhaps the term excellent would be even more accurate,” the president
wrote, adding that a third summit “would be good in that we fully understand where
we each stand.”

Trump added that North Korea could achieve “extraordinary growth, economic
success and riches under the leadership of Chairman Kim” but indicated the main
sticking point in talks when he said he looked forward to the day “which could be
soon, when nuclear weapons and sanctions can be removed”.

Since you’re here…

… we have a small favour to ask. More people around the world are reading The
Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism than ever before. We’ve now been
funded by over one million readers. And unlike many news organisations, we have
chosen an approach that allows us to keep our journalism open to all. We believe that
each one of us deserves access to accurate information with integrity at its heart.

The Guardian is editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our
journalism is free from commercial bias and not influenced by billionaire owners,
politicians or shareholders. No one edits our editor. No one steers our opinion. This
is important as it enables us to give a voice to those less heard, challenge the
powerful and hold them to account. It’s what makes us different to so many others in
the media, at a time when factual, honest reporting is critical.

Every contribution we receive from readers like you, big or small, goes directly into
funding our journalism. This support enables us to keep working as we do – but we
must maintain and build on it for every year to come. Support The Guardian
from as little as $1 – and it only