Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
not assumed that risk, and from this it follows that an insurer
seeking to defeat a claim because of an exception or limitation in
the policy has the burden of proving that the loss comes within the
VOL. 374, JANUARY 25, 2002 653 purview of the exception or limitation set up. If a proof is made of a
Country Bankers Insurance Corporation vs. Lianga Bay loss apparently within a contract of insurance, the burden is upon
and Community Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Inc. the insurer to prove that the loss arose from a cause of loss which is
excepted or for which it is not liable, or from a cause which limits its
* liability. Stated elsewise, since the petitioner in this case is
G.R. No. 136914. January 25, 2002.
defending on the ground of non-coverage and relying upon an
exemption or exception clause in the fire insurance policy, it has the
COUNTRY BANKERS INSURANCE CORPORATION, burden of proving the facts upon which such excepted risk is based,
petitioner, vs. LIANGA BAY AND COMMUNITY MULTI- by a preponderance of evidence. But petitioner failed to do so.
PURPOSE COOPERATIVE, INC., respondent.
Same; Hearsay Rule; A witness can testify only to those facts
which he knows of his personal knowledge, which means those facts
Evidence; Each party must prove his own affirmative which are derived from his perception·a witness may not testify as
allegations by the amount of evidence required by law which in civil to what he merely learned from others either because he was told or
cases, is preponderance of evidence, to obtain a favorable judgment. read or heard the same; The hearsay rule is based upon serious
·A party is bound by his own affirmative allegations. This is a concerns about the trustworthiness and reliability of hearsay
well-known postulate echoed in Section 1 of Rule 131 of the Revised evidence inasmuch as such evidence are not given under oath or
Rules of Court. Each party must prove his own affirmative solemn affirmation and, more importantly, have not been subjected
allegations by the amount of evidence required by law which in civil to cross-examination.·A witness can testify only to those facts
cases, as in this case, is preponderance of evidence, to obtain a which he knows of his personal knowledge, which means those facts
favorable judgment. which are derived from his perception. Consequently, a witness may
Same; Insurance; If a proof is made of a loss apparently within not testify as to what he merely learned from others either because
a contract of insurance, the burden is upon the insurer to prove that he was told or read or heard the same. Such testimony is considered
the loss arose from a cause of loss which is excepted or for which it is hearsay and may not be received as proof of the truth of what he
not liable, or from a cause which limits its liability.·Where a risk is has learned. Such is the hearsay rule which applies not only to oral
excepted by the terms of a policy which insures against other perils testimony or statements but also to written evidence as well. The
or hazards, loss from such a risk constitutes a defense which the hearsay rule is based upon serious concerns about the
insurer may urge, since it has trustworthiness and reliability of hearsay evidence inasmuch as
such evidence are not given under oath or solemn affirmation and,
more importantly, have not been subjected to cross-examination by
_______________
opposing counsel to test the perception, memory, veracity and
articulateness of the out-of-court declarant or actor upon whose
* SECOND DIVISION.
reliability on which the worth of the out-of-court statement
depends.
654 Same; Same; Exceptions; Entries in Official Records; Requisites.
·There are exceptions to the hearsay rule, among which are
entries in official records. To be admissible in evidence, however,
three (3) requisites must concur, to wit: (a) that the entry was made
654 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED by a public officer, or by another person specially enjoined by law to
do so; (b) that it was made by the public officer in the performance every time a party prevails in a suit because of the policy that no
of his duties, or by such other person in the performance of a duty premium should be placed on the right to litigate.·With respect to
specially enjoined by law; and (c) that the public officer or other the award of litigation expenses and attorneyÊs fees, Article 2208 of
person had sufficient knowledge of the facts by him the New Civil Code enumerates the instances where such may be
awarded and, in all cases, it must be reasonable, just and equitable
655 if the same were to be granted. AttorneyÊs fees as part of damages
are not meant to enrich the winning party at the expense of the
losing litigant. They are not awarded every time a party prevails in
a suit because of the policy that no premium should be placed on
VOL. 374, JANUARY 25, 2002 655
the right to litigate. The award of attorneyÊs fees is the exception
Country Bankers Insurance Corporation vs. Lianga Bay and rather than the general rule. As such, it is necessary for the court to
Community Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Inc. make findings of facts and law that would bring the case within the
exception and
_______________ _______________
5 Tai Tong Chuache & Co. v. Insurance Commission, 158 SCRA 366,
8 Section 36 of Rule 130 of the Revised Rules of Court.
372 (1988); Summit Guaranty & Insurance Co., Inc. v. Court of Appeals,
9 D.M. Consunji, Inc. v. Court of Appeals and Maria J. Juego, G.R. No.
110 SCRA 241, 249 (1981) citing 20 Am. Jur. 142; Paris-Manila Perfume 137873, April 20, 2001, pp. 3-4, 357 SCRA 249 citing 31A C.J.S. Evidence
Co. v. Phoenix Assurance Co., 49 Phil. 753 (1926). § 194 and Philippine Home Assurance Corp. v. Court of Appeals, 257
6 44 Am Jur 2d Insurance § 1938. SCRA 468, 479 (1996).
7 44 Am Jur 2d Insurance § 2021.
10 Section 216 [2], Gilbert, Law Summaries on Evidence, cited in
Remedial Law, Vol. V: Revised Rules on Evidence, Oscar M. Herrera,
661 1999 Edition, p. 565.
11 Section 44 of Rule 130 of the Revised Rules of Court provides:
VOL. 374, JANUARY 25, 2002 661 Entries in official records made in the performance of his duty by a public
Country Bankers Insurance Corporation vs. Lianga Bay officer of the Philippines, or by a person in the perfor
and Community Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Inc.
662
663
(a) that the entry was made by a public officer, or by
another person specially enjoined by law to do so;
(b) that it was made by the public officer in the VOL. 374, JANUARY 25, 2002 663
performance of his duties, or by such other person Country Bankers Insurance Corporation vs. Lianga Bay
in the performance of a duty specially enjoined by and Community Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Inc.
law; and
(c) that the public officer or other person had sufficient The petitionerÊs evidence to prove its defense is sadly
knowledge of the facts by him stated, which must wanting and thus, gives rise to its liability to the
have been acquired12 by him personally or through respondent under Fire Insurance Policy No. F-1397.
official information. Nonetheless, we do not sustain the trial courtÊs imposition
of twelve percent (12%) interest on the insurance claim as
The third requisite was not met in this case since no well as the monetary award for actual and exemplary
investigation, independent of the statements gathered from damages, litigation expenses and attorneyÊs fees for lack of
Jose Lomocso, was conducted by Pfc. Arturo V. Juarbal. In legal and valid basis.
fact, as the petitioner itself 13 pointed out, citing the Concerning the application of the proper interest rates,
testimony of Pfc. Arturo Juarbal, the latterÊs Spot Report the following guidelines were set in Eastern Shipping
„was based on the personal knowledge of the caretaker Jose Lines, Inc. v. Court of Appeals and Mercantile Insurance
15
Lomocso who witnessed every single incident surrounding Co., Inc.:
the facts and circumstances of the case.‰ This argument
undeniably weakens the petitionerÊs defense, for the Spot I. When an obligation, regardless of its source, i.e.,
Report of Pfc. Arturo Juarbal relative to the statement of law, contracts, quasi-contracts, delicts or quasi-
Jose Lomocso to the effect that NPA rebels allegedly set fire delicts, is breached, the contravenor can be held
to the respondentÊs building is inadmissible in evidence, for liable for damages. The provisions under Title
the purpose of proving the truth of the statements XVIII on „Damages‰ of the Civil Code govern in
contained in the said report, for being hearsay. determining the measure of recoverable damages.
The said Spot Report is admissible only insofar as it II. With regard particularly to an award of interest in
constitutes part of the testimony of Pfc. Arturo V. Juarbal the concept of actual and compensatory damages,
since he himself took the witness stand and was available the rate of interest, as well as the accrual thereof, is
for cross-examination. The portions of his Spot Report imposed, as follows:
which were of his personal knowledge or which consisted of
his perceptions and conclusions are not hearsay. The rest of 1. When the obligation is breached, and it consists in
the said report relative to the statement of Jose Lomocso the payment of a sum of money, i.e., a loan or
may be considered as independently relevant statements forbearance of money, the interest due should be
gathered in the course of JuarbalÊs investigation and may that which may have been stipulated in writing.
be admitted
14
as such but not necessarily to prove the truth Furthermore, the interest due shall itself earn legal
thereof. interest from the time it is judicially demanded. In
the absence of stipulation, the rate of interest shall
_______________ be 12% per annum to be computed from default, i.e.,
from judicial or extrajudicial demand under and
mance of a duty specially enjoined by law, are prima facie evidence of subject to the provisions of Article 1169 of the Civil
the facts therein stated. Code.
12 Africa v. Caltex (Phils.), Inc., 16 SCRA 448, 452 (1966).
2. When an obligation, not constituting a loan or
13 Rollo, pp. 16-17.
forbearance of money, is breached, an interest on Considering the foregoing, the insurance claim in this
the amount of damages awarded may be imposed at case is evidently not a forbearance of money, goods or
the discretion of the court at the rate of 6% per credit, and thus the interest rate should be as it is hereby
annum. No interest, however, shall be adjudged on fixed at six percent (6%) computed from the date of filing of
unliquidated claims or damages except when or the complaint.
until the demand can be established with We find no justification for the award of actual damages
reasonable certainty. Accordingly, where the of Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00). Well-entrenched is
demand is established with reasonable certainty, the doctrine that actual, compensatory and consequential
16
the interest shall begin to run from the time the damages must be proved, and cannot be presumed. That
claim is made judicially or extrajudicially (Art. part of the dispositive portion of the Decision of the trial
1169, Civil Code) but when such certainty cannot be court ordering the petitioner to pay actual damages of Fifty
so reasonably established at the time the demand is Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) has no basis at all. The
made, the interest shall begin to run only from the justification, if any, for such an award of actual damages
date the judgment of the court is made (at does not appear in the body of the decision of the trial
court. Neither is there any testimonial and documentary
evidence on the alleged actual damages of Fifty Thousand
_______________
Pesos (P50,000.00) to warrant such an award. Thus, the
15 234 SCRA 78, 95-97 (1994). same must be deleted.
Concerning the award of exemplary damages for Fifty
664 Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00), we likewise find no legal and
valid basis for granting the same. Article 2229 of the New
664 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED Civil Code provides that exemplary damages may be
imposed by way of example or
Country Bankers Insurance Corporation vs. Lianga Bay
and Community Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Inc.
_______________
which time the quantification of damages may be 16 Eduardo P. Lucas v. Spouses Maximo C. Royo and Corazon B. Royo,
deemed to have been reasonably ascertained). The G.R. No. 136185, October 30, 2000, p. 9, 344 SCRA 481; Integrated
actual base for the computation of legal interest Packaging Corporation v. Court of Appeals, 333 SCRA 170, 179 (2000);
shall, in any case, be on the amount finally Lucena v. Court of Appeals, 313 SCRA 47, 61-62 (1999).
adjudged.
665
3. When the judgment of the court awarding a sum of
money becomes final and executory, the rate of legal
interest, whether the case falls under paragraph 1 VOL. 374, JANUARY 25, 2002 665
or paragraph 2, above, shall be 12% per annum Country Bankers Insurance Corporation vs. Lianga Bay
from such finality until its satisfaction, this interim and Community Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Inc.
period being deemed to be by then an equivalent to
a forbearance of credit.
correction for the public good. Exemplary damages are
imposed not to enrich one party or impoverish another but
In the said case of Eastern Shipping, the Court further
to serve as a deterrent against or as a negative incentive to
observed that a „forbearance‰ in the context of the usury
curb socially deleterious actions. They are designed to
law is a „contractual obligation of lender or creditor to
permit the courts to mould behavior that has socially
refrain, during a given period of time, from requiring the
deleterious consequences, and its imposition is required by
borrower or debtor to repay a loan or debt then due and
public policy to suppress the wanton acts of an offender.
payable.‰
However, it cannot be recovered as a matter of right. It is
based entirely on the discretion of the court. We find no to enrich the winning party at the expense of the losing
cogent and valid reason to award the same in the case at litigant. They are not awarded every time a party prevails
bar. in a suit because of the policy that
18
no premium should be
With respect to the award of litigation expenses and 17
placed on the right to litigate. The award of attorneyÊs
attorneyÊs fees, Article 2208 of the New Civil Code fees is the exception rather than the general rule. As such,
enumerates the instances it is necessary for the court to make findings of facts and
law that would bring the case within the exception and
_______________ justify the grant of such award. We find none in this case to
warrant the award by the trial court of litigation expenses
17 Art. 2208. In the absence of stipulation, attorneyÊs fees and expenses and attorneyÊs fees in the amounts of Five Thousand Pesos
of litigation, other than judicial costs, cannot be recovered, except: (P5,000.00) and Ten Thousand Pesos (P10,000.00),
respectively, and therefore, the same must also be deleted.
1) When exemplary damages are awarded;
WHEREFORE, the appealed Decision is MODIFIED.
2) When the defendantÊs act or omission has compelled the plaintiff The rate of interest on the adjudged principal amount of
to litigate with third persons or to incur expenses to protect his Two Hundred Thousand Pesos (P200,000.00) shall be six
interest; percent (6%) per annum computed from the date of filing of
3) In criminal cases of malicious prosecution against the plaintiff; the Complaint in the trial court. The awards in the
4) In case of a clearly unfounded civil action or proceeding against amounts of Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) as actual
the plaintiff; damages, Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) as exemplary
5) Where the defendant acted in gross and evident bad faith in damages, Five Thousand Pesos (P5,000.00) as litigation
refusing to satisfy the plaintiffs plainly valid, just and expenses, and Ten Thousand Pesos (P10,000.00) as
demandable claim; attorneyÊs fees are hereby DELETED. Costs against the
6) In actions for legal support; petitioner.
SO ORDERED.
7) In actions for the recovery of wages of household helpers, laborers
and skilled workers; Bellosillo (Chairman), Mendoza, Quisumbing and
8) In actions for indemnity under workmenÊs compensation and Buena, JJ., concur.
employerÊs liability laws;
9) In a separate civil action to recover civil liability arising from a Judgment modified.
crime;
Notes.·Entries in official records are only prima facie
10) When at least double judicial costs are awarded;
evidence of the facts therein stated. They are not
11) In any other case where the court deems it just and equitable conclusive. (Ford vs. Court of Appeals, 186 SCRA 21 [1990])
that attorneyÊs fees and expenses of litigation should be
recovered.
_______________
666 In all cases, the attorneyÊs fees and expenses of litigation must be reasonable.
18 Ibaan Rural Bank, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 321 SCRA 88, 95 (1999).
666 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED
Country Bankers Insurance Corporation vs. Lianga Bay 667
and Community Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Inc.
VOL. 374, JANUARY 25, 2002 667
where such may be awarded and, in all cases, it must be People vs. Moreno
reasonable, just and equitable if the same were to be
granted. AttorneyÊs fees as part of damages are not meant
As a rule, insurance contracts are supposed to be
interpreted liberally in favor of the assured. (Sun
Insurance Office, Ltd. vs. Court of Appeals, 211 SCRA 554
[1992])
··o0o··