Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Guangxing Xu2
2 Shijiazhuang Railway Institute
Shijiazhuang, China
xugx@sjzri.edu.cn
B. Remeshing for Interface Elements III. CONSTITUTIVE RELATION AND DAMAGE EVOLUTION
MODEL OF EACH PHASE
The element size used to mesh above is close to the
minimum aggregates radius, it is too large relatives to the The key problem of numerical experiment on concrete
interface layer, and will cause distortion in simulating the failure lies on the damage constitutive relation model of
key part of concrete mesoscopic structure due to thick mesoscopic elements. Researches show that the nonlinear
interface layer. In order to simulate cracks better, SOLID45 stress-strain curve of concrete presented on macro does not
element type in ANSYS was used to remesh the interface due to its plastic deformation, but the generation and
element for three times. After each remeshing, the attribute development of micro cracks. Base on this, an isotropy
elastic damage constitutive relation was adopted to describe
of interface elements should be identified over again, and the
the mechanics characters of concrete mesoscopic elements.
principle for identifying is same to the above. In this way,
According to strain-equivalente principle by Lemaitre,
the elements need to remesh next time are restricted to those constitutive relation of damaged material can be gain
who still be interface elements after last remeshing, and the through the nominal stress of nondestructive materials,
number of remeshed non-interface elements is consumedly namely,
reduced. After remeshing three times, the grid of aggregates
become dense in surface and sparse inside to form an idea
ε = σ / E = σ /(1 − D) E 0 ,
gradient mesh, which reduced the number of elements yet σ = E 0 (1 − D)ε (0 ≤ D ≤ 1) (2)
can reflect the mesoscopic structure characteristics of
290
286
Where E0 and E are the initial and damaged elastic model MX2. The random mechanical parameters of each
modulus, and D is damage variables, in which D=0 phase were assigned following the method mentioned in
corresponding to none damage state, D=1 corresponding to II.C, only the heterogeneity of elastic modulus and strength
completely damage state (fracture or destroy) and 0<D<1 among all parameters were considered in model MX2. The
corresponding to partly damage state. mechanical parameters of model MX2 are shown in Tab.I,
According to the strain-equivalent principle, uniaxial and the eigenvalue in Tab.I were adopted as the parameters
tension damage evolution equation can be build by of model MX1. The loading scheme was shown in Fig.4,
equivalent Principal tensile strain. This paper takes two ends of samples were simply-supported, and loads
maximum tensile strain criterion as damage criterion, Fig.3 which controlled by vertical displacement were applied in
shows the double broken line damage constitutive model, the middle of the beam, there were 24 load step with each
the damage evolution equation is as follow, step 0.002mm.
TABLE I. WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION PARAMETERS USED TO
⎧0 ε < εt0 SIMULATE THE MATERIAL PARAMETERS OF CONCRETE PHASES
⎪
⎪1 − η − λ ε t 0 + 1 − λ ε t 0 ≤ ε < ε tr Compon-
Elastic Modulus Poiss Tensile Strength /Gpa
on's Eigenvalue Homogeneity
Density
⎪ η −1 ε η −1 ents Eigenvalue Homogeneity kN·m-3
D=⎨ μ/Gpa m ratio μ/Gpa m
⎪1 − λ ε t 0 ε tr ≤ ε < ε tu
Mortar 35 9 0.20 4 9 21
⎪ ε Interface 31 6 0.20 3.75 6 24
⎪ Aggregate 50 12 0.20 6 12 27
⎩1 ε ≥ ε tu (3) P
150
50 150 150 150 50
550
291
287
Figure 6 Distribution of material parameter for model MX2
292
288
4.0 The meso-mechanics damage and fracture process is
3.5 MX1 very complicated, and the arising and growth of concrete
MX2 crack shows remarkable abnormity and discontinuity. Under
3.0
the load of bend and tension, usually the first failure element
2.5 is the interface element near the underside of midspan. With
Stress
293
289