Sie sind auf Seite 1von 5

2010 Second International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation

3-D Numerical Simulation of Bending Fracture of Concrete Beam


Based on Meso-mechanics Damage

Chaohong Li1, 2 Hailong Wang1, 3


1 School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong 1 School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong
University University
Chengdu, China Chengdu, China
2 Shijiazhuang Railway Institute 3 Heibei Institute of Architecture and Civil Engineering
Shijiazhuang, China Zhangjiakou, China
li_zh@126.com wanghl@hebiace.edu.cn

Guangxing Xu2
2 Shijiazhuang Railway Institute
Shijiazhuang, China
xugx@sjzri.edu.cn

Abstract—A method for establishing 3-D random aggregate


and random mechancial parameters model on meso-level was model [3] and Random mechanics characteristic model [4].
proposed. Two numerical models of concrete beam specimens Using theses models, many achievements about uniaxial
with ANSYS were established. By the flexural numerical tensile, compressive strength and bending performance have
simulation of two models, the gradual damage process, the been obtained [5,6]. However, the current research mostly
arising and growth of crack were simulated in space. based on two-dimensional model, there were few
Influences of random distribution of aggregates and achievements based on 3-D model limited by the capacity of
heterogeneity of material parameters on crack expanding and computer, meanwhile, the utility structure analysis software
bearing capacity of specimen were researched. Results show were seldom used. In addition, the influence of
that the flexural strength of numerical test is basically heterogeneity of material parameters on 3-D model has not
corresponding with the result of physical experiment with the been reported.
same parameters. Characteristics of abnormity and Based on damage mechanics and computational
discontinuity in crack arising and growth are consistent with mechanics, a 3-D random aggregate and random mechanical
macroscopic experiment phenomenon. The numerical model parameters mesoscopic model is firstly put forward, with
proposed by this paper provided an effective method on the which the random distribution of aggregates location and
mechanism study of concrete damage and fracture. material characteristics can be simulated. Two concrete
flexural numerical models were simulated with this method,
Keywords-concrete; mesoscopic numerical model; numerical
experiment; random aggregate; random mechanical parameters; according to the experimental results, influences of random
damage and fracture distribution of aggregates location and material
characteristics to the capability of damage, crack and
bearing capacity of concrete beams have been researched,
I. INTRODUCTION the damage and fracture mechanism was further revealed.
Concrete is a kind of multiphase composite material with
heterogeneous and anisotropic, its mesoscopic structure is II. ESTABLISHING OF MESOCOPIC MODEL
mainly consist of aggregate particles, hardened mortar, In this paper, concrete is considered to be a composite
stomata and crevice, etc. Research results show that the material made up of three components: mortar, aggregates
macroscopic mechanical properties of concrete are and the bonding interface between them, based on this, a 3-
dominated by its mesoscopic structure, and the damage D random aggregate and random mechanical parameters
behavior on macro-scale is the result of accumulation and numerical model was established.
development of damage and fracture on meso-scale. With
the development of numerical analysis technology and high A. Element Meshing and Aggregates Generation
speed computing technology, mesoscopic numerical Aggregates are the important component of concrete
experiments on the meso-level has become an important which act as skeleton, they were frequently been simulated
method to reveal the damage and fracture mechanism of as sphere, ellipsoid and convex polyhedron, etc. In this
concrete. paper, aggregates were simplified as sphere. The number of
Many mesoscopic numerical models of concrete have aggregates was determined according to the sample size,
been proposed, in which several are widely used, such as aggregates gradation curve and aggregates percentage of
Lattice model [1], Random model [2], Random aggregate sample weight.

978-0-7695-3941-6/10 $26.00 © 2010 IEEE 285


289
DOI 10.1109/ICCMS.2010.47
Before generating aggregate particles, the sample was concrete. Fig.2 shows some local grids of the remeshed
divided into tetrahedron elements to generate finite element model, in which the white region represents mortar
mesh evenly with a size slightly less than the minimum elements, the gray region represents aggregate element and
radius of aggregates. Then the Monte Carlo method was the black region represents interface element.
used to generate random number based on sequence number
of elements. By searching the proper location of elements, a
set of virtual aggregates domain were randomly generated.
The spheres are allocated randomly starting with lager ones,
each new sphere is checked such that a minimum distance is
maintained between the spheres’ boundaries to assure space
for the matrix phase. In addition, in order to improve the
efficiency of aggregate generation, an algorithm called
occupying rejection was adopted to avoid repetition on
selecting, namely, eliminating the invalid elements who are
occupied by aggregates or do not meet the aggregates
generation conditions. Fig.1 shows the aggregates model of
this paper. Figure 2. Local grids of remeshed model

C. Random Mechanic Parameters Assigning for Material


Attribute of Elements
In order to consider the nonuniformity of material
parameters of each phase, their mesoccopic mechanics
parameters were assumed to according to two-parameter
Weibull random distribution. This distribution is mainly
used to describe the discreteness of strength parameters and
life parameters related to strength, it is a reference
distribution for strength and life parameters of brittle
material. The density function of two-parameter Weibull
distribution model is,
m⎛ x ⎞
m −1
⎡ ⎛ x ⎞m ⎤
f ( x) = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ exp ⎢− ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ⎥ ( x ≥ 0)
Figure 1. Random aggregate model of concrete μ ⎝μ⎠ ⎢⎣ ⎝ μ ⎠ ⎥⎦
When locating the spherical center of aggregates, the (1)
attribute of elements were been identified and the material
properties were then been assigned directly. If all the nodes Firstly, sequence of material parameters according to
of element are contained by certain sphere, this element will Weibull distribution was generated, and then be assigned to
be identified as aggregate element. If nodes are partially the elements by Monte Carlo method. In this way, the
contained, the element will be identified as interface random mechanics material parameters of elements in each
element. No nodes are contained for mortar element. phase become reality.

B. Remeshing for Interface Elements III. CONSTITUTIVE RELATION AND DAMAGE EVOLUTION
MODEL OF EACH PHASE
The element size used to mesh above is close to the
minimum aggregates radius, it is too large relatives to the The key problem of numerical experiment on concrete
interface layer, and will cause distortion in simulating the failure lies on the damage constitutive relation model of
key part of concrete mesoscopic structure due to thick mesoscopic elements. Researches show that the nonlinear
interface layer. In order to simulate cracks better, SOLID45 stress-strain curve of concrete presented on macro does not
element type in ANSYS was used to remesh the interface due to its plastic deformation, but the generation and
element for three times. After each remeshing, the attribute development of micro cracks. Base on this, an isotropy
elastic damage constitutive relation was adopted to describe
of interface elements should be identified over again, and the
the mechanics characters of concrete mesoscopic elements.
principle for identifying is same to the above. In this way,
According to strain-equivalente principle by Lemaitre,
the elements need to remesh next time are restricted to those constitutive relation of damaged material can be gain
who still be interface elements after last remeshing, and the through the nominal stress of nondestructive materials,
number of remeshed non-interface elements is consumedly namely,
reduced. After remeshing three times, the grid of aggregates
become dense in surface and sparse inside to form an idea
ε = σ / E = σ /(1 − D) E 0 ,
gradient mesh, which reduced the number of elements yet σ = E 0 (1 − D)ε (0 ≤ D ≤ 1) (2)
can reflect the mesoscopic structure characteristics of

290
286
Where E0 and E are the initial and damaged elastic model MX2. The random mechanical parameters of each
modulus, and D is damage variables, in which D=0 phase were assigned following the method mentioned in
corresponding to none damage state, D=1 corresponding to II.C, only the heterogeneity of elastic modulus and strength
completely damage state (fracture or destroy) and 0<D<1 among all parameters were considered in model MX2. The
corresponding to partly damage state. mechanical parameters of model MX2 are shown in Tab.I,
According to the strain-equivalent principle, uniaxial and the eigenvalue in Tab.I were adopted as the parameters
tension damage evolution equation can be build by of model MX1. The loading scheme was shown in Fig.4,
equivalent Principal tensile strain. This paper takes two ends of samples were simply-supported, and loads
maximum tensile strain criterion as damage criterion, Fig.3 which controlled by vertical displacement were applied in
shows the double broken line damage constitutive model, the middle of the beam, there were 24 load step with each
the damage evolution equation is as follow, step 0.002mm.
TABLE I. WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION PARAMETERS USED TO
⎧0 ε < εt0 SIMULATE THE MATERIAL PARAMETERS OF CONCRETE PHASES

⎪1 − η − λ ε t 0 + 1 − λ ε t 0 ≤ ε < ε tr Compon-
Elastic Modulus Poiss Tensile Strength /Gpa
on's Eigenvalue Homogeneity
Density
⎪ η −1 ε η −1 ents Eigenvalue Homogeneity kN·m-3
D=⎨ μ/Gpa m ratio μ/Gpa m

⎪1 − λ ε t 0 ε tr ≤ ε < ε tu
Mortar 35 9 0.20 4 9 21
⎪ ε Interface 31 6 0.20 3.75 6 24
⎪ Aggregate 50 12 0.20 6 12 27
⎩1 ε ≥ ε tu (3) P

150
50 150 150 150 50
550

Figure 4. Loading scheme of concrete meso-model

ε ε ε ε The numerical experiments were simulated in ANSYS


workstation of ShiJiaZhuang railway institute. There are 48
Figure 3. Damage constitutive model of double broken line CPU with Dual Core at 3.0GHz, the memory of each node is
8G and storage space is 3T.
Where f tr is residual tensile strength,
Fig.5 shows the 3-D numerical experiment model of
f tr = λf t = λE 0 ε t 0 , λ is residual strength coefficient MX1, in which interface elements were selected. Fig.6
shows the assigned material attribute of model MX2, in
(0.1 in this paper). ε t0 is strain corresponded to the peak which different colors present the random material
strength (0.0012 in this paper), and ε tr is residual strain, parameters according to Weibull distribution.

ε tr = ηε t 0 , η is residual strain coefficient (5 for aggregate, B. Describing of Failure Process


There appears several damage elements in model MX1
4 for mortar and 3 for interface in this paper). ε tu is just at the beginning of the load law, when the load applied
ultimate tensile strain (0.012 in this paper), ε tu = ξε t 0 , ξ at 3rd load step, the tensile strain of one interface element,
3.5mm to the bottom of sample and 26mm to one side,
is ultimate strain coefficient (10 in this paper) and ξ > η . reaches to 0.012mm, concrete near it crazed at first. With the
IV. NUMERICAL EXPERIMENT

A. Numerical Experiment Servey


Two secondary grading wet screened sample models
with a height of 550mm,length of 150mm,thickness of
150mm were built to simulate concrete beams, the
proportion of middle and small size aggregates is 0.45:0.55
and their diameter are 30mm and 15mm, separately. Only
the influence of random distribution of aggregate was
considered in model MX1, furthermore, the influence of
heterogeneity of material parameters was also considered in Figure 5 3-D numerical model of model MX1

291
287
Figure 6 Distribution of material parameter for model MX2

increasing of applied load, the damage and failure elements


near bottom grow rapidly, and the number of failure
Figure 8 damage cracking process of model MX2
interface elements increase dramatically from bottom to the
top of the beam. There are a few failure mortar elements and
almost no damage aggregate. When applied at 17th load
step, there are a lot of interface and mortar elements
damaged near the midspan. Cracks grow and their width
increase notability, due to some elements broke and
converged together. An obviouse macroscopical crack came
into being, it penetrated the whole sample bottom, and the
sample reached its ultimate bending strength, 4.01MPa. The
bearing capacity decreased and a lot of interface elements,
part of mortar elements and a few aggregate elements broke
with the load increasing furthermore. Model MX1 Model MX2
Also, there appear several damage elements in model MX2
at the beginning of the load law. When the load applied at 2nd Figure 9 failure element distribution of concrete beam reaching
ultimate strength
load step, the tensile strain of one interface element, 5.4mm to
the bottom of sample and 73mm to one side, reaches to The failure process related above indicates that the
0.014mm, this element broke at first. With the increasing of damage and fracture process is very complicated. Because of
applied load, the damage developed more quickly then model the random distribution of aggregate, the arising and growth
MX1. When applied at 19th load step, Model MX2 reached its of concrete crack shows remarkable abnormity and
ultimate bending strength, 3.74MPa. The crack growth was
discontinuity.
lower than model MX1, and the numbers of failure elements
were larger more than model MX1. C. Influence of the Heterogeneity of Material Parameters
Fig.7 and Fig.8 show the process of damage and failure
Assumed the material parameters of phases of model
of model MX1 and MX2 respectively. The distribution
situation of failure elements when the samples reached their MX2 according to the distribution of Weibull, the
ultimate bearing is shown in Fig.9. homogeneity of aggregates was the highest, the second was
mortars, and interfaces had lowest homogeneity. Results
show the deformation of model MX2 grows quickly than
model MX1. The bearing capability of model MX2 is lower,
while its deformation is larger than model MX1. This is
probably because there forms an initial weak plane due to
the heterogeneity of material, the existing of weak plane
may lead to stress concentration, element that has a lower
strength broke first. Meanwhile, the randomness of arising
and growth of crack are also increased, and expand the
distribution region of crack. The load-displacement of two
models is shown in Fig.10. The stress-strain curve of model
MX2 is closer with [11] because of the considering of
heterogeneity of material.
Figure 7 damage cracking process of model MX1

292
288
4.0 The meso-mechanics damage and fracture process is
3.5 MX1 very complicated, and the arising and growth of concrete
MX2 crack shows remarkable abnormity and discontinuity. Under
3.0
the load of bend and tension, usually the first failure element
2.5 is the interface element near the underside of midspan. With
Stress

2.0 the increasing of the load, the number of damaged element


increased, cracks extend zigzag to the top of the beam.
1.5 Considered the heterogeneity of material parameters, the
1.0 bearing capability of sample decreased and deformation
0.5 increased, this can reflect the characteristic of concrete more
actually.
0 1 2 3 4 5 Based on the platform of utility FEM software ANSYS,
-4
Displacement / (10 v/h) the method proposed by this paper is convenient and
efficient.
Figure 10 Load-displacement curve of the model MX1 and MX2
REFERENCES
V. CONCLUSIONS [1] J.G.M. van Mier, M.R.A. van Vliet, “Experimentation, numerical
simulation and the role of engineering judgement in the fracture
In this paper, a method for establishing 3-D random mechanics of concrete and concrete structures,” Construction and
aggregate and random mechanical parameters concrete Building Materials, vol. 13, 1999, pp. 3-14.
model based on meso-level was proposed. Some preferable [2] Bazant Z P, Tabbara MR, Kazemi M T, “Pijaudier-Cabot G. Random
methods for generating 3-D random aggregate were particle model for fracture of aggregate or fiber composites,” Journal
of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 116, 1990, pp. l686-1705.
researched, and by which the efficiency in generating
[3] MA Huai-fa, CHEN Hou qun, L I Bao-kun, “Meso-structure
random aggregate was improved. Methods for interface numerical simulation of concrete specimens,” Journal of Hydraulic
element remeshing and random mechanical parameters Engineering, vol 35, 2004, pp.27-35.
assigning were also presented. Based on the 3-D numerical [4] TANG Chun-an, ZHU Wan-cheng. Damage and Fracture of
model of concrete, numerical models test were carried out. Concrete Numerical Test [M]. Beijing:SciencePress, 2003.
Result shows that the load-displacement curve of the [5] Eric N. Landis, Edwin N. Nagy, Denis T. Keane, “Microstructure
numerical model is basically corresponding with physical and fracture in three dimensions,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics,
vol.70, 2003, pp.911-925.M. Young, The Technical Writer’s
experiment with the same parameters. So the numerical Handbook. Mill Valley, CA: University Science, 1989.
model proposed by this paper could be taken as an effective [6] Ying Zongquan, Du Chengbin, Liu Bing, “Meso-scopic analysis of
method on the mechanism study of concrete damage and fracture process of concrete beam under bending,” Journal of
fracture. Southeast University, vol.37, 2007, pp.213-21.

293
289

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen