Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Assigned: SERGEANT SOREM Date Assigned: 3/11/2015 Days Case Due In: Date Due:
Current Case Disposition: Pending Date Completed: 11/13/2015 How Complaint Was Reported: PHONE
Complainant Satisfaction: Satisfaction Comments:
Summary: called to complain that Officer Umbright was biased in his investigation of a squeaky cage housing a squirrel resulting in a noise dispute between two
1 - Right to Privacy
adjacent apartments. Sgt. Sorem looked into the situation and found that no bias was present, and that Umbright handled the situation remarkably well. No action
taken.
Type Of Complaint Description Complaint Disposition
Complaint #: 1 CHAPTER 7 (2.31) MEMBER MISCONDUCT bias and incomplete investigations UNFOUNDED
Chris
Regarding case number 15-P02093. 1 - Right to Privacy called to complain that Greg seemed “unhelpful” and minimized the other person’s role
in the problem, and made him feel like Greg did not take him seriously. He said he thought that Greg knew the other person and was
showing favoritism, and did not even go talk to 1 - Rig... . This is the guy who has a squeaky pet cage that kept 1 - Right to Privacy up and 1 - Rig... told
him to keep it quiet or he’d beat his ass. Greg offered to contact 1 - Rig... , and 1 - Right... did not want him to. Greg offered suggestions on how
1 - Righ... might reduce the noise the squeaky cage made, and explained that1 - Righ... had a right to call in a noise complaint on his squeaky cage.
Greg explained that he could get an anti-harassment order (which 1 - Righ... did get). After I spoke with Greg I called 1 - Rig... back and asked him
if Greg had offered to contact 1 - Rig... , and he said he did. I asked him if he had told Greg that he did not want him to contact 1 - Rig... , and he
said he did. I told him that Greg is not friends with 1 - Rig... , but knew him from other police cases. I asked 1 - Righ... if there was anything else
we could do for him. He said no.
By Exemption:
By Page: