Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2
Design Life
The EUROCODE knows “structural classes”,
reflecting the importance and usage of structures
The usual design life is 50 years, however the
highest structural class assumes 100 years
Infrastructure buildings, like tunnels, fall in this
category
The design life is then one of the inputs for the
durability considerations
3
Durability - Concrete
IS456 defines the Environmental Exposure
Conditions
EC2 defines the Exposure Classes
All codes recognize that Concrete is exposed to
chemical attacks (chloride, sulphate), and that the
deterioration of the concrete may lead to unsafe
conditions and reduced design life.
The requirements on the mix design, components
and concrete cover derive from durability
considerations
4
Attack and consequences – e.g. carbonisation
6
Historical Image – Tunnelling / Masonry Lining
7
Lining - New Austrian Tunnelling Method
Rabcewicz 1944 (Patent 1948):
First flexible, thin support to allow the rock mass the possibility
of deformation to reduce rock pressure
After reduction of rock pressure installation of final support
Optimisation of this process by means of observation and
monitoring
Waterproofing may be installed before installation of final lining
1. Excavation
2. Primary lining
3. Invert in final thickness
4. Final Lining
5. Abutments for final lining
6. Waterproofing
8
Typical lining of a Road Tunnel
10
Issues to be tackled
Tunnel linings are always in contact with the
ground
Tunnel linings are exposed to groundwater
The “air side” of tunnel linings may be exposed to
other agents, i.e. freezing / thawing in cold
climates, sea salt, heat, and the residuals of
seepage water that evaporated (!)
Different lining types have different requirements
11
Segmental Lining (single shell)
Is usually reinforced
Is precast (means lesser variation in cover)
Highly controlled environment for production (lesser
variation in cover)
Must withstand directly all exposures, including
water pressure
Durability criteria ensured inter alia through
prescribed maximum RCPT value
Cover is in line with codal provisions (like EN206)
12
Exposure – Single Shell
13
Cast insitu lining
Invert is usually reinforced
In the overt reinforcement is avoided if possible
Due to site casting, more cover requirement
especially on the ground face
However waterproofing membranes are reducing
the exposure, and drainage systems reduce
exposure to water pressure
Cover is in line with codal provisions (like EN206)
14
Cast-insiut lining - exposures
16
Exposure to Fire
Apart from chemical attack, a tunnel may
experience during the 100 year lifetime tunnel fires
The impact on the lining depends on the fire load
(metro tunnel – highway tunnel with petroleum
tanker incident)
Spalling of the concrete leads to loss in cross
section and eventually complete loss of lining
Can be tackled through prescribed cover (IS) or by
mixing fibres into the concrete
Fire resistance checks are part of the design
17
Destroyed Lining after fire in Road Tunnel
18
THANKS
FOR YOUR
ATTENTION !
19