0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
76 Ansichten2 Seiten
Letter from me to the Crown Solicitors office dated 4 July 2006. This copy was received under FOI. Christa Ludlow was apparently now the Assistant Crown Solicitor fr the Employment Law Firm so the matter was referred to Anina Johnson who was going to discuss whether the website was defamatory with Bruce Cantrill of the Crown Solicitors Office.
Originaltitel
My response to Letter of Defamation Dated 4 July 2006
Letter from me to the Crown Solicitors office dated 4 July 2006. This copy was received under FOI. Christa Ludlow was apparently now the Assistant Crown Solicitor fr the Employment Law Firm so the matter was referred to Anina Johnson who was going to discuss whether the website was defamatory with Bruce Cantrill of the Crown Solicitors Office.
Letter from me to the Crown Solicitors office dated 4 July 2006. This copy was received under FOI. Christa Ludlow was apparently now the Assistant Crown Solicitor fr the Employment Law Firm so the matter was referred to Anina Johnson who was going to discuss whether the website was defamatory with Bruce Cantrill of the Crown Solicitors Office.
FILE No.905 05.07.06 15:54 — ID:CROWM*S0LS 2245222 PRGE 4,
1na/07/2026...02:48 95253019 4 Raine ciel Ovsppce al
A 95253019
Jolanda & Peter Challita
FAX: 9224 501]
dated 30 June 2006 and advise that I believe 100% that what I am
ct I believe that Magda Pollak has not only targeted, defamed,
ved, vilified, discriminated against and caused serious harm to my
Wcamed and discredited me by misrepresenting matters, manipulating
Renting me as an angry, hostile parent who is doing damage to her
k vexatious. All of these comments by Magda Pollak are defamatory
dle worked ta ensure that my children and family have been denied
Hand natural justice and cemained targeted.
adlbeen defaming and victimising my children and family for many years
Hpent of Education when she is well aware that her comments are untrue
plaints were made end December 2002 in relation to Danny”s 2000
Class (OC) placement, Katie's 2001 Year $ OC placement and
ho2 Year 7 Scloctive High School (SHS) placement and appeal and
Il) SHS placement and appeal
2003 ~ (Th A)
2. Copy lettd! forwarded by me to the then Minister for Education Mr Refshauge
dated 17 Sknuary 2004. ~ (Tab B)
Drese/iy74 1ST
ipueatyo24 24FILE No.905 05.07.°06 15:55 — ID:CROWN*SOLS. Fax:geeaseee PAGE
2a/a7/22B6 82:48 = 9825219 ‘ PAGE 82
F804 in relation tf
elective High Sch
Wingrave
2. Copy em
‘onduct and that
Fre Department
Of epartmental sta
fi jbuse of children
Tin”
fyplanda Challita
reached Policy al
| 95253019
hile from Magda Pollak to Upaporn Blunden dated 4 March 2004. ~
Hel file note produced under FOI from Mr. John Mum of the
of Education dated 22 June 2004. — (Tab D)
dLizgestions, Complaints and Allegations form was lodged on 17 June
the marking of Katie’s writing Ella test in 2004 and Danny’s Year 8
cl placement for 2004 and appouls.
\n { provide herewith the following:
from Mr. John Murn to Magda Pollak, David Wasson and Bob
ied 24 June 2004. — (Tab E)
from Mr. Chris Ballantine, Audit Directorate and John Mumm in early
4. - (Tab F)
bic from Mr. John Murn dated 13 August 2004, - (Tab G)
from Mr. Bill Middleton of the Audit Directorate dated 19 August
H).
lamount of evidence, in addition to the above, thet shows that Magda
‘and shown bias against my family and has breached her Code of
1c Department of Education has also foiled in its duty of eare and
Procedure,
copy of my letter to you dated February 2006 for which I have not
areply.
Education is trying to cover up serious allegations made against
despite the fact that it involves educational neglect and psychological
their care,
re that until my family is afforded procedural faimess and these
10 proper and fair investigation, as per policy and procedure require,
1d I will continue to expose what is happening, defend our family’s
Jing and do everything in our power to get protection and justice for
Bt