Structural Audit Report - Building No. 26 PDF

Structural Audit Report for
Building No.26
Vartak Nagar, Thane (W)
203 Chamber, Near Sakinaka Tel Exchange

Kurla Andheri Road, Andheri (E), Mumbai – 400 072
Phone: +91-22-28526926 /27
capstone@capstone.co.in
www.capstone.co.in
DATE REV. NO PREPARED BY
18th September, 2017 R0 Rahul Agarwal (BMC Reg No: STR/A/49)

1. Introduction
The G+3 building was constructed 55 years earlier.
Due to the age of the structure, there are many areas in the building where deterioration in the
structure is observed. Some members of the society have carried out repair works as and
when required in their respective flats.
However no comprehensive structural repair work has been carried out for the complete
building in the recent past.
The current structural audit work is being carried out to get a better understanding of the
current condition of the building, required rectification measures and to further estimate the
residual life of the building.
The purpose of this survey was to:
a) Carry out visual assessment in each of the flats and in the common areas of the building
to identify the type of distress in the structural members.
b) Ascertain the non-destructive tests that are required to be carried out to get a quantitative
idea about the condition of the building.
Page 2 of 21
w: www.capstone.co.in
2. Observations
a) Observations for each flat have been presented in the form of drawings, where different
types of defects as identified during visual assessment have been marked.
b) Observations for common area and terrace level have also been shown on drawings.
c) Indicative photographs showing different types of defects are presented below.
Page 3 of 21
3. Photographs
Observation 1 - Cracks in Structural RCC Members (Beam / Columns / Slab) :-
Page 4 of 21
Page 5 of 21
Page 6 of 21
Observation 2 – Cracks in masonry wall:-
Page 7 of 21
Page 8 of 21
Observation 3 – Spalling of concrete & Reinforcement Exposed :-
Page 9 of 21
Page 10 of 21
Page 11 of 21
Observation 4 - Leakage / Dampness in Masonry Walls / Concrete Members:
Page 12 of 21
Page 13 of 21
Observation 5 - Vegetation Growth :-
Page 14 of 21
Observation 7 – Plumbing Line Leakage :-
Page 15 of 21
Observation 7 – Peeling of Paint
Page 16 of 21
Page 17 of 21
4. Analysis of Test Results & Overall Conclusion :-
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Tests:

Out of the 20 points tested, all points fall under the ‘Doubtful’ category. A doubtful quality
of concrete indicates presence of cracks, voids and other imperfections in concrete.
Since all of the readings fall under the ‘Doubtful’ category, the quality of concrete can be
considered to be poor in general.
It was seen during visual inspection that the surface concrete has severely deteriorated at
many locations due to corrosion of reinforcement, hence the low reading values for the
UPV test are again an indication of the deteriorated nature of surface concrete.
Half Cell Potential Tests:

Half-cell potential results show that all values fall under the category “UNCERTAINITY
OF CORROSION”.
Hence it is evident that corrosion is present in almost all concrete members which have
been tested.
Carbonation & Rebar Cover Meter Tests:

Carbonation test was carried out at 10 locations in the building. The average depth of
carbonation was obtained as 40 mm.
Cover Meter test was carried out at 3 locations. In most cases the cover has been found to
be between 30 to 35mm range.
This shows that carbonation has occurred to a depth higher than the cover of most
reinforcement bars which indicates that the cover concrete is no longer able to provide
protection to reinforcement bars against corrosion.
Page 18 of 21
Rebound Hammer Tests:
The rebound hammer test result show a very low strength of concrete. Many readings give
the concrete strength as below 9 MPa which is significantly low compared to an acceptable
concrete strength. This indicates the surface concrete is weak. This is due to the distress in
surface concrete because of corrosion in reinforcement.
To assess that the strength of internal concrete, core cutting tests should be carried out.
Chemical Tests:
The results of pH, chloride and sulphate tests show that these parameters are within the
permissible limits of indian standards.
Page 19 of 21
Overall Conclusion :-
From the test results & visual observations following conclusions can be arrived at:
a) Corrosion in reinforcement is present in most of the tested members, Hence retrofitting of

members with addition of new reinforcement will be required in some cases and rust
removal treatment of existing reinforcement may suffice for other cases.
Members where addition of new reinforcement is required can be decided during repair
works, once the corroded reinforcement is completely visible.
b) Due to presence of corrosion, the surface concrete has deteriorated and hence the strength
of surface concrete has become lower. Surface concrete will have to be repaired at all
locations where distress has been observed.
In particular distressed slabs should be attended on priority to prevent any mishap.
c) Leakages from terrace slab and toilets must be arrested to prevent further decay of RCC
members.
After carrying out the required structural and non-structural repairs, the life of the
building can be extended by 3 years.
Page 20 of 21
DRAWINGS FOR
OBSERVATION
Page 21 of 21
NDT Test Report
for
Puranik Builders Pvt. Ltd
Building No. 26 / Vartak Nagar CHSL
Vartak Nagar, Near Shastri Nagar, Ticket Counter,

Thane (W), Thane- 400606
Capstone Project # 17-PR-4459/ C
Capstone Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

203, Elecon Chamber
Near Sakinaka, Telephone
Exchange
Kurla-Andheri Road
Andheri (E), Mumbai 400 072
Phone- 2852 6926/27

ndt@capstone.co. in
www.capstone.co.in
Name of Person Signature Date
Supervisor Vivek Mishra 13-09-17
Report prepared Santosh Yadav 20-09-17
Report checked Likhil Raut 20-09-17
Rahul Agarwal
Approved 20-09-17
(M.Tech IIT Bombay)
PROJECT INFORMATION PAGE
Building No. 26 / Vartak Nagar

Customer Puranik Builders Pvt. Ltd Building Name
CHSL
Vartak Nagar, Near Shastri Nagar, Ticket

Site Address Report Date 20-09-17
Counter, Thane (W), Thane- 400606
CCPL Project no. 17-PR-4459/ C Structure Age
Structure Type RCC No. of Floors G+3
Building Usage Residential
Number of Tests Conducted at Site
UPV 20 HCP 10
Rebound Hammer 20 Carbonation 9
Core cutting 0 Rebar Mapping 2
Pile Integrity 0 Pile Dynamic 0
Weld Test (MPI) 0 Weld Test (LPI) 0

Ultrasonic
0 Chemical Test 2
Thickness Gauge
Symbols used on Drawings
UPV HCP
Rebound Hammer Carbonation
Core cutting Rebar Mapping
Naming Conventions used in Report
- Element number as per client's drawing

- These can be based on grid numbers if no element numbers are available
Member ID
- Element numbers are provided by us if no element or grid numbers are present on client's
drawing
- Floor at which element is present. For columns, the start and end floor levels are indicated.
Level
- In case of industrial buildings, this can be the approximate height from ground level
Columns: whether the test has been done near the Top, Middle or Bottom of the column height
Test Location on Beams: whether the test has been done near the mid-span(MID) or near the supports (END)
Member Slabs: whether the test has been done near any of the slab edges (EDGE) or away from
the
edge (CENTER)
Capstone
CONSULTANTS
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Tests

Application:
These tests are primarily done to establish:
• the homogeneity of concrete
• presence of cracks, voids and other imperfections
• changes in quality of concrete over time
• this test does not establish compressive strength
of tested concrete
UPV Tests are done in accordance with Indian standards
IS: 13311 (Part 1)
UPV Test on a beam
Procedure:
• The concrete surface where probes are to be applied is cleaned properly.
• Grease is applied on the test surfaces
• The probes are pressed on the surface of the structural element to remove air gaps.
• Distance between the two probes is noted.
• Read time taken for the ultrasonic pulse from the instrument.
• Calculate Velocity = distance / time
Sr. No Pulse velocity by cross probing Concrete Quality Grading

1 Above 4.5 km/s Excellent
2 3.5 km/s to 4.5 km/s Good
3 3.0 km/s to 3.5 km/s Medium
4 Below 3.0 km/s Doubtful
Rebound Hammer Tests

Application:
These tests are primarily done to assess:
• the likely compressive strength of concrete
• the uniformity of concrete
Rebound Hammer tests are done in accordance with Indian standards IS: 13311 (Part 2)
Procedure:
• The concrete surface is cleaned properly
• The hammer is pressed against the concrete
surface and released
• Six readings are taken and an average is taken.
• Correlate the average with the compressive
strength
Rebound Hammer Test

203, Elecon Chamber, Near Sakinaka Tel. Exchange, Kurla - Andheri Road, Andheri (E), Mumbai - 400 072
T :+91 - 22 – 28526926, F :+91 - 22 – 28526927, www.capstone.co.in, capstone@capstone.co.in
Capstone
CONSULTANTS
Half Cell Potential & Carbonation Tests
Application:
These tests are used to assess the probability of corrosion in reinforcement.
HCP Tests are done in accordance with ASTM C876 standard.
Procedure for Half Cell Potential Tests:

• Identify test location & drill a hole in the concrete to reach the reinforcement.
• Establish electric contact with the reinforcement.
• Place the half cell at various locations on the concrete surface & measure voltage in
the voltmeter.
• Correlate the obtained voltages to probability of corrosion as per ASTM standard.
Procedure for Carbonation Tests:

• Identify test location & drill a hole in the concrete to reach the reinforcement.
• Inject chemical & insert steel rod
• The color change determines till what depth carbonation has taken place
Carbonation tests can also be done on extracted cores by applying the chemical on the
core and measuring the depth till which the carbonation has taken place.
Half Cell Potential Test Carbonation Test

Reinforcement Mapping Tests
Application:
Rebar mapping is a mechanism to obtain information related to reinforcement in existing
concrete buildings where drawings are missing or reinforcing data needs to be verified.
These tests are carried out to:
• check the size and numbers of reinforcing bars present in concrete members
• determine the concrete cover provided to reinforcement
• prepare structural drawings for RCC structures where original drawings are not
available
Procedure:
• Identify the test locations on each member so that all required reinforcement data
can be captured.
• Clean the surface of the structural member.
• Locate main reinforcement bars and determine number/spacing of the bars.
• Determine diameter of main bars.
• Locate secondary bars (or stirrups) and determine number/spacing of the bars.
• Determine diameter of secondary bars.
• Data obtained for similar members must be correlated to obtain more meaningful
results in terms of rebar diameter.
• This test does not determine grade of reinforcement.
Rebar Mapping of column Rebar Mapping of Footing

Chemical Tests
Application:
These tests are used to assess the pH level, Chloride (Cl) content and SO3 content of
concrete.
A higher pH value or a higher content of chloride or SO3 than permitted by Indian standard
codes shows the presence of an environment where corrosion of reinforcement has much
higher probability than normal.
Procedure:
• The chemical tests are conducted on powdered concrete sample collected from the
site.
• The powdered samples are tested in the lab using test kits from reputed
manufacturers.
• The obtained results are correlated with the permissible limits given by IS 456: 2000
code and reported.
Permissible Limits:
Ph Not less than 8
3
For PCC, maximum 3.0 kg of Chloride per m3 of concrete.
Cl (kg/m )
For RCC, maximum 0.6 kg of Chloride per m3 of concrete.
SO3 (%) Less than 4% by mass of cement in the concrete mix.
pH Test Chemical Test

NDT TEST RESULTS (UPV / Rebound Hammer / HCP / Carbonation)
Customer Puranik Builders Pvt. Ltd Building Name Building No. 26

Project no. 17-PR-4459/ C Buildiing Age
HCP Carbonation
Test Location UPV Results Rebound Hammer Results
Results Results
Test Hammer
Performe Equiv. cube
Serial Member Location UPV Concrete Potential Depth Reading Hammer
Unit Level Element Type d on strength
No. ID on (km/s) Quality (mV) (mm) (Rebound Direction
Core? (MPa)
Member Number)
1 C1 G-1 Column Bot 1.74 Doubtful -324 40 20 HOR Below 9
2 C2 G-1 Column Bot 2.16 Doubtful 26 HOR 10
3 C3 G-1 Column Bot 1.95 Doubtful -325 60 27 HOR 12
5 C5 G-1 Column Bot 1.88 Doubtful 23 HOR 9
7 C7 G-1 Column Bot 1.95 Doubtful -279 30 22 HOR Below 9
8 C8 2-3 Column Bot 2.02 Doubtful -284 26 HOR 10
9 C9 2-3 Column Bot 1.83 Doubtful -268 40 22 HOR Below 9
10 C10 2-3 Column Bot 1.68 Doubtful 26 HOR 10
11 B1 3 Beam Mid 1.94 Doubtful 27 HOR 12
12 S1 3 Slab Center 1.99 Doubtful 22 VUP Below 9
13 C11 3-4 Column Bot 1.63 Doubtful 22 HOR Below 9
14 C12 3-4 Column Bot 1.76 Doubtful -321 50 14 HOR Below 9
15 S2 4 Slab Center 1.87 Doubtful 25 VUP Below 9
16 S3 4 Slab Center 1.99 Doubtful -340 30 27 VUP Below 9
17 S4 4 Slab Edge 1.77 Doubtful 18 VUP Below 9
18 S5 4 Slab Edge 1.74 Doubtful 27 VUP Below 9
19 C13 4-5 Column Bot 1.65 Doubtful -284 50 24 HOR 9
20 C14 4-5 Column Bot 1.64 Doubtful 23 HOR 9
UPV Results Summary Average 40.0 23.5

Concrete
Criteria No. of readings HCP Results Summary
Quality
Probability of No. of
Above 4.5 km/s Excellent 0 Criteria
corrosion readings
3.5 to 4.5 km/s Good 0 More than -200 mV 10% 0
3.0 to 3.5 km/s Medium 0 -200 mV to -350 mV 50% 10
Below 3.0 km/s Doubtful 20 Less than -350 mV 90% 0
Notes
Name of Person Signature Date a) For calculating cube strength from rebound hammer
Supervisor Vivek Mishra 13-09-17 values, appropriate reduction factors for surface
carbonation of concrete has been considered.
Rahul Agarwal
20-09-17
Approved (M.Tech IIT Bombay)
NDT TEST RESULTS (Rebar Cover Meter Test)
Customer Puranik Builders Pvt. Ltd Building Name Building No. 26

Project no. 17-PR-4459/ A Building Age
NDT RESULTS
Test Location For Beam / Column For Slabs / Wall Only
Secondary Remarks
Serial Member Dimensions of Concrete Concrete
Unit Level Element Type Main Bars Nos bar spacing
No. ID Member mm Cover mm Cover mm
mm
1 C1 G-1 Column 30
2 C4 G-1 Column 35
Name of Person Signature Date

13-09-17
Test Engineer Vivek Mishra
20-09-17
Report prepared Santosh Yadav
20-09-17
Report checked Likhil Raut
Rahul Agarwal 20-09-17
TEST RESULTS FOR CHEMICAL TEST
Customer Puranik Builders Pvt. Ltd
Building Name Building No. 26
Vartak Nagar, Near Shastri Nagar, Ticket Counter,

Project no. 17-PR-4459/ C Site Address
Thane (W), Thane- 400606
Report Date 20-09-17 Building Age
Test Location Chemical Test Results
Serial Member CL SO3

Unit Level Element Type pH
No. ID (kg/m3) (%)
1 C1 G-1 Column 8 0.240 <0.5%
2 C4 G-1 Column 9 0.360 <0.5%
Notes: Permissible limits as per IS 456:2000
Ph Not less than 8
3
For PCC, maximum 3.0 kg of Chloride per m3 of concrete.
CL (kg/m )
For RCC, maximum 0.6 kg of Chloride per m3 of concrete.
SO3 (%) Less than 4% by mass of cement in the concrete mix.
Name of Person Date

Supervisor Vivek Mishra 13-09-17
Rahul Agarwal 20-09-17

REPAIR METHODOLOGY
Repair methodologies for different type of defects observed in this building are presented below in sub-sections.
It shall be noted that suggested methodologies are based on the fact that the building shall be used for only 1 to 2 years after repairs . Hence repairs are
suggested for critical deficiencies only and the BOQ has also been prepared accordingly.
NOTE: ALL STRUCTURAL REPAIRS TO BE CARRIED WITH PROPER TEMPORARY SUPPORTS TO TRANSFER THE LOAD FROM DISTRESSED MEMBER UNDER
REPAIR.
Repair type 1:
Treatment for Exposed Reinforcement and Spalling of Concrete / Cracks in concrete members due to corroded reinforcement
(When new reinforcement is not required to be added).
When corrosion of reinforcement occurs, it exerts pressure on the concrete leading it to cracks in concrete. When the corrosion is severe, concrete
portions break apart from the main member which is called spalling of concrete. Spalling of concrete will lead to complete exposure of reinforcement,
which becomes susceptible to further corrosion. This makes the reinforcement ineffective and reduces the life of the concrete member.
When the loss in cross sectional area of reinforcement is not considerable, then the repair methodology suggested in this annexure can be adopted.
However if after removal of surface concrete and removal of rust from corroded reinforcement, it is seen that the bar diameter has reduced by more than
20% for beams and slabs, and 25% for columns, then additional rebar will have to be provided. In this case refer Repair Type 2 for repair methodology.
Recommendation:
• Use light chipping hammers to remove concrete from the affected area. Clean the surface thoroughly and remove all dirt & loose dust and
aggregate.
• Clean the exposed steel reinforcement with mechanical wire-brushing.
• The reinforcement should then be protected against corrosion by applying Feovert chemical of Krishna Conchem.
• Apply a bonding agent to the existing concrete surface so that proper bonding of the existing concrete to the repair material can take place. The
bonding agent has to be applied as per the manufacturer’s instructions.
• Apply Polymer modified mortar (PMM) to repair the concrete member and bring it to its original shape and size. The PMM should be applied while
the bonding agent is still tacky.
• Cure the repaired concrete member adequately.
Note:
1) Speed and time for application of any chemical or PMM should be as per manufacturer’s instructions.
2) It is not advisable to place PMM above 30 deg Celsius. Newly prepared surface should be protected from rainfall and other source of water. However
it should be moist cured for 1 to 3 days under ambient temperature or as per manufacturer’s instructions.
Repair Type 2:
Treatment for Exposed Reinforcement and Spalling of Concrete / Cracks in concrete members due to corroded reinforcement
(When new reinforcement is required to be added).
When the reinforcement has corroded considerably and the rebar diameter has reduced by more than 20% for beam & slab, and 25% for columns, the repair
methodology suggested in this annexure shall be adopted.
Recommendation for Repair of Columns:
aggregate.
• Clean the exposed steel reinforcement with mechanical wire-brushing and by using a Feovelt.
• Add new reinforcement bars, as per the sketches provided in this annexure.
• The new reinforcement should then be protected against corrosion by applying Krishna Conchenis Feovelt Chemical.
• Apply an bonding agent to the existing concrete surface so that proper bonding of the existing concrete to the repair material can take place. The
bonding agent has to be applied as per the manufacturer’s instructions.
• Apply Polymer modified mortar (PMM) to repair the concrete member and bring it to its original shape and size. The PMM should be applied while
the bonding agent is still tacky.
• Cure the repaired concrete member adequately.
Note:
• Speed and time for application of any chemical or PMM should be as per manufacturer’s instructions.
• It is not advisable to place PMM above 30 deg Celsius. Newly prepared surface should be protected from rainfall and other source of water.
However it should be moist cured for 1 to 3 days under ambient temperature or as per manufacturer’s instructions.
Recommendation for Repair of Beams & Slabs:
For repair of beams and slabs, following methodology should be adopted:
aggregate.
• Clean the exposed steel reinforcement with mechanical wire-brushing and by using a Feovelt.
• Add new reinforcement bars, as per the sketches provided in this annexure.
• The new reinforcement should then be protected against corrosion by Krishna Conchenis Feovelt Chemical.
• MICROCONCRETE : micro-concreting to be done after erection of shuttering around the existing beam/slab. Micro concrete has to be poured
from the top after creation of sufficient number of holes in the existing slab. Since vibration will not be possible after pouring micro-concrete, a
super plasticizer admixture will have to be used.
• Cure the shotcreted surface adequately at least for seven days minimum. Curing can be done using wet burlap and hose pipes.
Retrofitting Details for Slabs:
Retrofitting Details for Beams:
Repair Type 3:
Leakage from External Plumbing Lines
It was observed that water seepage is occurring from external plumbing pipes at certain locations. This may be due to:
• damage in plumbing pipes
• poor workmanship leading to gaps at pipe junctions
• choking of pipes restricting free movement of water
This water seepage is going into the masonry walls and concrete members. Where the seepage is occurring in the concrete members, it will lead to
corrosion of reinforcement which will lead to reduction in strength of the rebar as well as development of cracks in concrete.
Recommendation: All such locations where external plumbing lines are leaking should be identified and the plumbing lines should be checked for damage,
blockages or gaps in connections.
Based on the findings, plumbing lines to be repaired or replaced.
Repair Type 4:
Leakage from Terrace Slab due to Damage in Waterproofing
At some places it was observed that leakage is occurring in the slabs through the terrace slab. This is happening due to deterioration in waterproofing.
Recommendation:
1. Chemical waterproofing membrane should be overlaid on the current surface. Products such as Dr. Fixit’s new coat or other similar products can
be used.
Repair Type 5:
Vegetation Growth in Building

Vegetation growth or moss growth that we see in the building is generally due to the dampness in particular area of building. Mostly it occurs near pipes or in
groves of chajja, where water is generally present. This trees root infiltrate in concrete and reaches up to reinforcement, because of this seepage of water
occurs in concrete and reaches reinforcement and causes corrosion of steel. Due to corrosion, steel exerts tension in concrete, while concrete is weak in
tension so cracks tends to appear in concrete which in turn leads to spalling of concrete.
Recommendation:
1. Removing live plants from the structure can cause additional damage because it may also tear off surrounding building materials that have been
weakened. To kill the roots, a “cut-and-paint” technique – where the plant is cut and the cut surface is then painted with an herbicide – is usually
recommended.
2. Moss and lower order plants can be effectively removed with an appropriate biocide and a soft bristle brush, being sure to wet the surface prior to
cleaning and to work from the bottom up to minimize streaking.
3. “Glyphosate” which is marketed as a weed killer and seems to be less toxic yet effective can also be used. Initially A 1:1 solution of Glyphosate, in
water can be sprayed over the affected areas.
BILL OF QUANTITY FOR REPAIR
BUILDING NO - 26 , VARTAKNAGAR ,THANE, MUMBAI G+3
I. ENABLING SYSTEM :-
Sr. No. Work Description Quantity Unit Rate Amount

1 M.S. PROPS: 150.00 Nos. 200.00 30,000.00
2 SCAFFOLDING:
Providing & Fixing Single or Double Bamboo scaffolding to the
1900.00 sqmt 60.00 114,000.00
external fa ç ade of the building and as per the direction of
Engineer In Charge
3 BREAKING OF CONCRETE/PLASTER:-
Breaking of old concrete/plaster of any thickness and at all levels,
855.00 sqmt 180.00 153,900.00
including cleaning of exposed surface. complete as per the
direction of Engineer In Charge
4 SHUTTERING WORKS:-
Providing and laying waterproof shuttering ply material or steel
plates for all type of shuttering works required for jacketing, micro 598.50 sqmt 800.00 478,800.00
concrete, recasting, etc. complete as per the direction of Engineer
In Charge
TOTAL 776,700.00
II. STRUCTURAL REPAIR:-
Sr. No. Work Description. Quantity Unit Rate Amount

1 STRUCTURAL REPAIR (P.M.M.):
1) Application of Feovert
Brushing with wire brush and removing all rust scales from rebars
& washing with water as required and providing and applying
Feovert on existing exposed reinforcement bars.
2) Bond coat (1:1)
Providing and applying Polymer Bond Coat / system to all 650.00 sqmt 1500.00 975,000.00
exposed concrete surface and rebars prior to polymer treatment
complete.
3) P.M.M.
Providing and applying Polymer modified mortar in ratio 1:5:15 (1
part by weight of polymer: 5 parts by weight of cement: 15 parts
by weight of River sand) up to all thickness complete. Etc.
2 MICRO-CONCRETE:
Providing and laying Super Fluid Micro concrete which
shall be single component, non-shrink, free flow, self-compacting,
ready to use after mixing water in specified proportion to the beam 9500.00 Kg 70.00 665,000.00
bottoms, columns, slabs, etc. Including mixing with 05mm to
10mm size aggregates, pouring, temping, Consolidating, curing
etc.
3 PRO & FIX STEEL:
Providing and fabricating, fixing steel as required for column and 5000.00 Kg 80.00 400,000.00
beams. complete as per the direction of Engineer In Charge
4 Anchoring of Rebars & Shear Connector: Providing
and supplying Medium duty injection adhesive
Re - 500 or equivalent for rebar fixing for Rebar dia from 8
mm upto 16mm. Drilling hole into rock or concrete to the
required depth by rotary hammer drill, cleaning with brush and jet
2500.00 Nos. 150.00 375,000.00
of clean air, filling resin and hardener with standard
dispenser in hole and then fixing the re-bar, The system
should be made of two foils consisting of resin and Hardener foil
pack.The installation and the setting instructions should be strictly
followed as per the manufacturers recommendations.
TOTAL 2,415,000.00
III. CIVIL REPAIR WORKS:-
Sr. No. Work Description Quantity Unit Rate Amount

1 PLASTERING WORK :
Providing 20mm thick External Plastering in two coats, under
layer 12mm thick with C.M. 1:4 finished with a top layer 8mm
thick in C.M. 1:5 including admixtured with approved Water
proofing admixture @ 2% by weight of cement used or as per 855.00 sqmt 700.00 598,500.00
manufacturer's specifications,
sieving of sand to required fineness, finishing, curing, etc.
complete as per specifications, drawings and complete as per the
direction of Engineer In Charge
2 TERRACE WATERPROOFING: Providing and applying
chemical base waterproofing, cleaning the surface with Air-
blower and water. Then laying Chemical base waterproofing on 320.00 sqmt 600.00 192,000.00
terrace surface areas as per the manufacturer specification etc.
complete.
3 EXTERNAL PLUMBING REPAIR LS LS 100,000.0 100,000.00
TOTAL 890,500.00
BOQ SUMMARY
ENEABLING SYSTEM 776,700.00
STRUCTURAL REPAIR 2,415,000.00
CIVIL REPAIR WORK 890,500.00
Total 4,082,200.00
The above amount is excluding taxes

Structural Audit Report - Building No. 26 PDF

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Structural Audit Report - Building No. 26 PDF

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Structural Audit Report for

203 Chamber, Near Sakinaka Tel Exchange

DATE REV. NO PREPARED BY

18th September, 2017 R0 Rahul Agarwal (BMC Reg No: STR/A/49)

The G+3 building was constructed 55 years earlier.

The purpose of this survey was to:

c) Indicative photographs showing different types of defects are presented below.

Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Tests:

Half Cell Potential Tests:

Carbonation & Rebar Cover Meter Tests:

a) Corrosion in reinforcement is present in most of the tested members, Hence retrofitting of

In particular distressed slabs should be attended on priority to prevent any mishap.

Puranik Builders Pvt. Ltd

Building No. 26 / Vartak Nagar CHSL

Vartak Nagar, Near Shastri Nagar, Ticket Counter,

Capstone Project # 17-PR-4459/ C

Capstone Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Phone- 2852 6926/27

Name of Person Signature Date

Supervisor Vivek Mishra 13-09-17

Report prepared Santosh Yadav 20-09-17

Report checked Likhil Raut 20-09-17

Building No. 26 / Vartak Nagar

Vartak Nagar, Near Shastri Nagar, Ticket

CCPL Project no. 17-PR-4459/ C Structure Age

Structure Type RCC No. of Floors G+3

Building Usage Residential

Number of Tests Conducted at Site

Rebound Hammer 20 Carbonation 9

Core cutting 0 Rebar Mapping 2

Pile Integrity 0 Pile Dynamic 0

Weld Test (MPI) 0 Weld Test (LPI) 0

Symbols used on Drawings

Rebound Hammer Carbonation

Core cutting Rebar Mapping

Naming Conventions used in Report

- Element number as per client's drawing

Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Tests

Sr. No Pulse velocity by cross probing Concrete Quality Grading

Rebound Hammer Tests

Capstone Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Half Cell Potential & Carbonation Tests

Procedure for Half Cell Potential Tests:

Procedure for Carbonation Tests:

Half Cell Potential Test Carbonation Test

Capstone Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Rebar Mapping of column Rebar Mapping of Footing

Capstone Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Ph Not less than 8

SO3 (%) Less than 4% by mass of cement in the concrete mix.

pH Test Chemical Test

Capstone Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Customer Puranik Builders Pvt. Ltd Building Name Building No. 26

Vartak Nagar, Near Shastri Nagar, Ticket

Project no. 17-PR-4459/ C Buildiing Age

1 C1 G-1 Column Bot 1.74 Doubtful -324 40 20 HOR Below 9

2 C2 G-1 Column Bot 2.16 Doubtful 26 HOR 10

3 C3 G-1 Column Bot 1.95 Doubtful -325 60 27 HOR 12

4 C4 G-1 Column Bot 2.43 Doubtful -250 20 25 HOR 9

5 C5 G-1 Column Bot 1.88 Doubtful 23 HOR 9

6 C6 G-1 Column Bot 1.97 Doubtful -283 40 24 HOR 9

7 C7 G-1 Column Bot 1.95 Doubtful -279 30 22 HOR Below 9

8 C8 2-3 Column Bot 2.02 Doubtful -284 26 HOR 10