Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Megan Hoots
University of Florida
Introduction
Today, the greatest threat to life on Earth is, without a doubt, plastic
pollution. Although “marine plastic pollution has been a growing concern for decades”
(Xanthos & Walker, 2017, p. 17), the scientific community is only just comprehending
enter our ocean and estuaries at an alarming rate. In fact, “it is estimated that plastic
debris accounts for 60-80% of marine litter” (Xanthos & Walker, 2017, p. 17), with an
estimated 8 million metric tons of plastic entering our oceans annually. A 2014 study
“estimated that 5.25 trillion plastic particles (weighing 269,00 tons) are floating in the
sea” (Xanthos & Walker, 2017, p. 17) with no working solution to remove the debris. A
majority of the world’s plastic debris are from end use consumer items or single-use
plastics (SUPs), which include “plastic bags, microbeads, cutlery, straws, and
polystyrene” (Schnurr et al, 2018, p. 157). The essay will focus on the impact of SUP,
with a concentration on single-use shopping bags, along with the legislative and non-
legislative actions that can help to curb their production and consumption.
History of Plastics
toothbrushes, records and Tupperware, and by the 1950’s and 1960’s [turning plastic]
into bags, clothing and toys” (Dauvergne, 2017, p. 24). The following decades saw a
steady increase in plastic use, “by 1970, plastic production had risen to 35 million metric
tons, up from 2 million metric tons in 1950” (Dauvergne, 2017, p. 24). The twenty first
century saw a peak plastic production, with more than 300 million metric tons of plastic
produced by the year 2010 (Dauvergne, 2017). At this rate, total global plastic
production is expected to exceed 500 million metric tons by the year 2025 (Dauvergne,
2017). In total, “manufacturers have now produced over 9 billion metric tons of plastic,
roughly equal to 90 billion people weighing 220 pounds each” (Dauvergne, 2017, p.
24). Approximately 40% of this plastic production is packaging, which includes a variety
of SUPs. Single-use plastic bags make up a majority of SUP litter accounting for
“roughly... 5-6 grocery bags of plastic for each foot of seashore” (Dauvergne, 2017, p.
23) globally. In the United States, plastic bags constituted 33% of the litter found along
produce, and “ubiquitous throughout the world” (Wagner, 2017, p.4). Made from fossil
fuels, these utilitarian bags serve one primary purpose; to move materials from point of
purchase to a destination (Wager, 2017). Over the last three decades, consumers have
been habitualized into expecting, free single-use plastic shopping bags” (Wagner, 2017,
p. 4) with every purchase. The United States alone consumed 103 billion single-use
plastic bags in 2014 (Wagner 2017). Unfortunately, SUP shopping bags have an
average life span of 12 minutes before being discarded and only 12% of SUP shopping
bags are properly recycled (Wager, 2017). Due to their aerodynamic/ballooning nature,
plastic bags are “likely to inflate and then be disappeared by the wind, even at low wind
speeds and will travel considerable distances” (Wagner, 2017, p. 5). The ease of their
mobility “is the primary cause of them becoming land litter and eventually marine debris”
(Wagner, 2017, p. 5) as they are carried into our waterways where they wreak havoc on
fragile ecosystems.
Plastic bags pose a huge threat to marine life; entanglement can “cause
(Xanthos & Walker, 2017, p. 18). In addition, the “ingestion of plastics by birds and
turtles have been… widely reported” (Xanthos & Walker, 2017, p. 18), often becoming
fatal to the species. Research indicates that single use plastic bags are the most
destructive form of plastics to marine life (Xanthos & Walker, 2017). The lifespan of
cold, dark depths of the oceans” (Dauvergne, 2017, p. 23) and breaking apart into small
2017, p. 24) as primary plastics breakdown into every smaller particles. New studies are
finding evidence that microplastics are entering the “human food chain through the
ingestion of fish, shellfish and filter feeders causing potential human health impacts”
(Xanthos & Walker, 2017, p. 18). Microplastic have been found in not only seafood, but
in both tap and bottled water as well (Dauvergne, 2017). Cutting edge research
(Dauvergne, 2017, p. 24). The introduction of plastics into human tissue through
nanoplastics has created an impending global health crisis that must be curbed by a
Governing the production and distribution of single-use plastic bags has been
difficult because of the influence and power of the global plastics industry which profit
on the habitual use of plastic bags (Dauvergne, 2017). Legislation to curb the use of
plastic bags are implemented through bans, partial bans or fees for a single-use plastic
bag (Xanthos & Walker, 2017). Denmark became the world's first country to tax plastic
bag production in 1993, “a policy that helps explain why Danes now consume on
average 4 single-use plastic bags a year (compared to say, Poland, with an average of
around 400 bags per year)” (Dauvergne, 2017, p. 26). Since 2002, “countries in Africa,
Asia, and the rest of Europe have steadily introduced bans… or levies on plastic bag
consumption” (Xanthos & Walker, 2017, p. 19). England was the last country in the UK
to adopt a levy on plastic bags and “following the introduction of the five pence levy in
England, plastic bag use at seven major supermarkets dropped 85% (Xanthos &
Walker, 2017, p. 22). Global initiatives include the CleanSeas campaign, announced in
February of 2017 which aims to eliminate major sources of marine debris by 2022, and
the European Union is requiring all plastic packing to be reusable or recycled by the
year 2030. Regardless of the irrefutable evidence that global legislative efforts have
helped to greatly reduce plastic bag consumption, and the worldwide measures to
reduce waste, America’s promise to govern single-use plastic bags have been limited.
In the United States, “only four states have imposed bans or levies on plastic
bags, suggesting that North America’s policies for plastic bag interventions are lacking
compared to other countries” (Xanthos & Walker, 2017, p. 19). In 2016, the state of
California banned single-use plastic bags, becoming one of the most progressive states
in America and reducing the consumption of plastic bags by 15 billion. While federal and
state efforts to ban or levy plastic bags fail, many local governments have taken action.
There were “271 local governments in the USA with plastic bag ordinances covering
some local governments “continue to increase their actions on plastic bags, 11 states
have enacted laws to prohibit local governments from regulating single-use plastic
Legislation in Florida
The state of Florida preempts any local government from having the ability to
regulate SUPs, including plastic bags. In 2018, Florida Senate Bill 348 would allow
certain coastal communities to regulate or ban plastic bags, but the bill died in
committee before becoming law (Diaz, 2018). Recently, “the first plastic bag ban in the
state [of Florida] was… enacted in the City of Coral Gables” (Diaz, 2018, p. 102)
because of a loophole granted by the 1957 Home Rule Charter for Miami Dade County
which exempted the county from home rule restrictions. Until state legislators lift the
restrictions that prohibit municipalities from enacting their own laws, local legislation to
Non-Legislative Efforts
society’s dependence and over use of single-use plastic bags. As long as local
community must lead the fight for change. Beach cleanups must be ongoing to not only
remove litter off our shores but to highlight to the public the clear and present impact of
educate the public on the harmful effects of plastic pollutants and both microplastics and
dependence on SUPs must be made visible and accentuated to emphasize the need for
a meaningful and sustainable divorce from SUPs. I would like to propose a large scale,
Each year high school students across the United States participate in the age-
old tradition of prom. In an effort to address the SUP crisis, the local 501c3 non-profit
Plastic Free Florida can partner with the Indian River School District to implement a
Green Prom Program throughout the school district. Green Prom Program would
significantly reduce, if not totally eliminate, all SUP during the event with special
attention in avoiding any single-use utensils, cups, water bottles and other common
marine pollutants such as balloons. These efforts would instill in our youth the
are particularly imperative for this county because Indian River is a coastal community
located on the Indian River Lagoon which is very vulnerable to marine pollutants.
Protecting the lagoon and its fragile ecosystem, which is central to the quality of life on
of political power- disruptive, irreverent, and transformative” (Dittmar & Entin, 2014, p. 2)
when wielded properly. Throughout history “art proved a powerful tool for social
persuasion- the vehicle through which alternative values are broadcast” (Dittmar &
and social change around our dependency on SUPs. It is important for educators to
“expand our students’ understanding of the need for progressive social change and
encourage them to do something about” (Dittmar & Entin, 2014, p. 4) the ecological
crisis SUPs have created. I would like to propose a partnership between the Indian
River County School District and Plastic Free Florida to address SUP pollutants with a
cut boutonniere on the lapel of a jacket, while a floral corsage is affixed to the waist or
bodice of a dress. With the permission of the Indian River School District, Plastic Free
Florida can provide art educators in local high schools with the tools they need to create
boutonnieres and corsages out of recycled single-use plastic bags. Plastic Free Florida
can source recycled bags in mass quantities and distribute them as needed to the
classrooms. The Plastic Free Florida community outreach chair will be made available
to instruct teachers and students how to construct floral arrangements from single-use
plastic bags, mimicking the traditional boutonnieres and corsages. Art classrooms will
be tasked with collectively producing enough boutonnieres and corsages for the entire
student body. On the night of prom, students will attend, en masse, wearing their
recycled boutonnieres and corsages. The collective participation will “bring people
together in thought and action that go[es] beyond the individual experience” (Dittmar &
signaling for change in the display of their SUP boutonnieres and corsages.
Conclusion
With microplastics entering the global food chain and nanoplastics passing
uniform Federal legislation curbing plastic consumption and many local municipalities
are prevented from enacting their own solutions to reduce SUPs. Effective non-
legislative actions can be taken, such as volunteer outreach with non-profits groups to
educate the public on the harmful effects of SUPs. Art educators have the power to
raise awareness by partnering with non-profits and activists’ groups to raise awareness
in the classrooms with effective artmaking. With the support of local school districts art
educators can help be the vehicle for social and behavioral change through thoughtful
community-based curricula.
Figure 1. Single flower made from recycled single-use plastic bag
Figure 2. Bouquet of flowers made from single-use plastic bags
References
Dauvergne, P. (2017). Why is the global governance of plastic failing the oceans?
Diaz, H. (2018). Plastic: Breaking down the unbreakable. Florida Coastal Law Review,
85, 87-113.
Dittmar, L., Entin, J. (2014). Jamming the works: art, politics and activism. Radical
Schnurr, R., Albooiu, V., Chaudhary, M., Corbett, R., Quanz, M., Sankar, K.,… Walker,
Xanthos, D., & Walker, T. (2017). International policies to reduce plastic marine
Wagner, T. (2017). Reducing single-use plastic shopping bags in the USA. Waste