Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Introduction
my second placement, I was put into a 2nd grade classroom at Camelot Elementary in
following Virginia History SOL 2.8: The student will distinguish between the use of barter and
the use of money in the exchange for goods and services. I ended up designing a 5 question pre-
You will find the pre-assessment attached at the end of the paper.
In Mrs. Castro’s class, the demographics are found through a minority majority. Below,
These results show that a majority of students do not know the material already. There is
definitely a lot of room for growth with these students based on this subject material. There were
two students not present during the day of the pre-assessment, but they were there the day after.
During small group time in the morning, they took the pre-assessment, still not skewing the data
Nine days after the assessment the students retook the assessment. Before this, students
were taught 9 different lessons that satisfied auditory, kinesthetic, and visual needs. The class
demographic, nor did the reading levels of students changed between two weeks of teaching.
When looking at the data, it shows a huge jump in growth for the students in regards to
the class average. Compared to the pre-assessment, more than half the class passed the
assessment with a 60% and up. When looking at the averages of the questions missed, question
number 4 and 5 were still the hardest questions for the class as a collective whole.
Looking at the data, the teacher should see that many students need to learn about the
importance of bartering, money, differences between consumers and producers, and examples for
all four of those topics. When looking at the needs of the class, some of the accommodations
would be kinesthetic/interactive learning for students. Many of the students show signs of
ADHD, however it can’t be defined due to their personalities still being developed; we also have
to take into our ESL students, two Spanish-speaking and one Vietnamese-speaking. With both of
these types of students in mind, allowing pictures to be accompanying the definitions will assist
Lesson Preparation
For the lowest group, pulling them as a small group and reviewing over definitions and
scenarios would be the best. These would be like a sort or a small quiz to work together as a
group with the teacher. For whole group instruction, having the students complete a Venn-
diagram that allows students to visualize definitions and examples for bartering and money
would be good. Verbal repetition of words and the definitions would work with this class, as
many are verbal learners. Ultimately, checking for understanding will be a huge portion of lesson
teaching as what the students know will help pace the lesson.
Because of the pre-assessment, and being the sole designer of it, my cooperating teacher
allowed me to teach the lessons that followed it all the way to the post-assessment. It was so
much fun! Students worked through 8 different lessons that consisted of sorts, putting notes
inside the interactive notebook, reading from the textbook, and an interactive activity on scarcity.
Because of these lessons, students were able to double the class average in their score, however,
based off of some of the scores, some of the questions were still a little advanced for some of the
students; specifically the open response and writing questions. All of the preparation and
teaching led to the students learning and satisfying the requirements for the state standards.
When designing the lessons, students met the standards of performance “to designate the level of
the knowledge or skill that’s considered acceptable within a particular grade level” (Powell,
2012). These standards help build the lesson, not only set the bare minimum, but where the
PLANNING PREPARATION INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT Riffle 5
teacher shouldn’t go over. A lot of times when creating these lessons, teachers know more than
what’s required to teach, and need to be pulled back to not confuse the students.
One thing that I noticed with second grade, is the transition in processing information.
(Bergin, 2015). This development is heightened when students are able to constructively choose
answers, even if they don’t know the correct answers. They learn process of elimination at this
age, and giving them the tools of knowing what is not correct, makes it even better for students
to learn and test better. When teaching the classes for this specific content, many students began
making connections for “if this is a consumer, that means this is a producer,” or something that
followed along the lines. This lining up of thoughts with course material, showed them preparing
for the upcoming assessment, based off of memorization and interactive learning.
One of the perks of assessing information that students know before learning a topic, is
the opportunity to connect to other experiences. C.S. Lewis wrote in Mere Christianity “as you
advance to more real and more complicated levels, you do not leave behind you the things you
found on the simpler levels: you still have them, but combined in new ways – in new ways you
could not imagine if you knew only the simpler levels” (Lewis, 2009). All education builds upon
previous things students know and do, and slowly gets more and more complex; teaching the
show not only staff growth, but to also show students their own growth. Showing students their
own growth boosts confidence, and shows them they can succeed.
PLANNING PREPARATION INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT Riffle 6
References
Bergin, D. A., & Bergin, C. A. (2015). Child and adolescent development in your classroom.
Australia: Wadsworth.
Lewis, C. S. (2009). Mere Christianity: A revised and amplified edition, with a new introduction, of
the three books, Broadcast talks, Christian behaviour, and Beyond personality. New York:
HarperOne.
Powell, S. D. (2012). Your introduction to education: Explorations in teaching. Upper Saddle River,
J: Pearson Education.