Sie sind auf Seite 1von 27

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/328123543

Vertebral Comparative Anatomy and Morphological Differences in Anguine


Lizards with a Special Reference to Pseudopus apodus: Vertebral column and
ribs of Pseudopus apodus

Article  in  The Anatomical Record · January 2019


DOI: 10.1002/ar.23944

CITATION READS

1 335

6 authors, including:

Andrej Čerňanský Oleksandr Yaryhin


Comenius University in Bratislava I. I. Schmalhausen institute of zoology NAS of Ukraine
47 PUBLICATIONS   326 CITATIONS    19 PUBLICATIONS   32 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Jana Ciceková Ingmar Werneburg


Comenius University in Bratislava Senckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment an der Univers…
5 PUBLICATIONS   18 CITATIONS    78 PUBLICATIONS   798 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Miscellaneous View project

Mesozoic reptiles View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Andrej Čerňanský on 19 November 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


THE ANATOMICAL RECORD (2018)

Vertebral Comparative Anatomy and


Morphological Differences in Anguine
Lizards With a Special Reference to
Pseudopus apodus
ANDREJ CER  
NANSKÝ ,1 OLEKSANDR YARYHIN ,2,3,4 JANA CICEKOVA,  1
INGMAR WERNEBURG,2,5,6 MIROSLAV HAIN,7 AND JOZEF KLEMBARA1*
1
Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Ecology, Comenius University in Bratislava,
Bratislava, Slovakia
2
Senckenberg Center for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment (HEP) an der Eberhard
Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
3
I.I. Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv,
Ukraine
4
Faculty of Biology, Department of Zoology, Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National
University, Lutsk, Ukraine
5
Fachbereich Geowissenschaften der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen,
Tübingen, Germany
6
Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung an
der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
7
Institute of Measurement Science, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia

ABSTRACT
The article reports on the first detailed vertebral and rib morphology of
anguine taxon Pseudopus apodus using micro-computed tomography. A
comparison shows significant morphological differences of vertebrae of
Pseudopus relative to those of Anguis and Ophisaurus. Usually, there are
55 presacral vertebrae, two sacral, and 95–97 caudal vertebrae. Pseudopus
apodus can be defined by 23 diagnostic features concerning the vertebral
column. Although zygapophyseal articulation between atlas and axis is
well developed in limbed anguid gerrhonotine lizards like Abronia or Bari-
sia, it is absent in the extant representatives of the clade Anguinae, which
are limbless. Thus, our study brings further support to the hypothesis
about the complete reduction of this articulation in forms with reduced or
absent limbs. Comparison of adult and juvenile morphology of vertebrae of
P. apodus was also analyzed. Heterochrony in the evolution of this taxon
was previously confirmed by its skull morphology and it can be also docu-
mented on the basis of vertebrae. Our data suggest that a peramorphic het-
erochronic process played a role in the evolution of this largest extant
anguine species. Geometric morphometric analyses revealed a pattern of
high vertebral disparity among species. We found a clear separation of
limbless forms in morphospace. Pseudopus apodus always clusters within
Ophisaurus-species confirming molecular and some morphological phyloge-
nies. Only the first tail vertebra shows a distinct difference to those of

Grant sponsor: NSF; Grant number: EF-0334961; Grant spon- Jana Ciceková is currently affiliated with The Bridge Lan-
sor: DigiMorph.org; Grant sponsor: University of Texas at Aus- guage Centre, Baštová 344/7, 811 03 Bratislava 1.
tin; Grant sponsor: SNF; Grant number: P300PA_164720. Received 21 November 2017; Revised 22 March 2018; Accepted
*Correspondence to: Jozef Klembara, Faculty of Natural Sci- 6 April 2018.
ences, Department of Ecology, Comenius University in Bratislava, DOI: 10.1002/ar.23944
Ilkovicova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia. Tel: 02/602 96 257 Published online 00 Month 2018 in Wiley Online Library
Fax: (02) 654-29-064 E-mail: jozef.klembara@uniba.sk (wileyonlinelibrary.com).

© 2018 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC.


2 
CER 
NANSKÝ ET AL.

other anguids, which might be related to altered locomotion associated to


the larger body size in this species. Anat Rec, 2018. © 2018 Wiley
Periodicals, Inc.

Key words: squamata; legless lizards; postcranial skeleton; mor-


phology; ribs

This article represents a contribution to the knowledge predominant food (86.1%), with gastropods forming 8.3%
of the osteology of Pseudopus apodus and refers to the of the prey. The locomotory behavior of this legless large
previous papers of Klembara et al. (2014, 2017a) on the anguine lizard was described by Gans and Gasc (1990).
lower jaw and skull morphology. Nowadays, P. apodus The only source of knowledge of the anatomy of the ver-
(Pallas, 1775)—the glass lizard or sheltopusik—occurs in tebral column and ribs of Pseudopus apodus are the line
South-East Europe to Central Asia. It composes, together drawings of several vertebrae and ribs in the paper of
with Ophisaurus (North America, South-East Asia, and Fejérváry-Lángh (1923) used for comparative purposes
North Africa) and Anguis (Europe and West Asia), the for the description of the fossil species P. pannonicus.
Anguinae clade, which is nested inside Anguidae Hoffstetter and Gasc (1969) published line drawings of
(Conrad, 2008). All extant members of Anguinae are leg- sacral vertebrae of P. apodus and briefly described them
less having serpentiform morphology. The limb reduction in the context of the vertebral column anatomy of all liz-
is not restricted to Anguinae, but is frequently observed ards. In addition to P. apodus, in all other papers dealing
in other lizard clades such as Scincoidea, Gekkota, or with the anatomy of the postcranial skeleton of other spe-
Amphisbaenia (see e.g., Lande, 1978; Gans and Montero, cies of anguines, the authors mostly provide only short
 nanský, 2016). In addition to
2008; Lee et al., 2009; Cer descriptions or simple figures of the given vertebral ele-
Anguinae, three other clades belong to the Anguidae: Ger- ment in terms of the comparisons with the fossil forms
rhonotinae, Diploglossinae, and Glyptosaurinae (Conrad, (e.g., Hilgendorf, 1885; Meszoely, 1970; Bachmayer and
2008). The Gerrhonotinae and Diploglossinae are Młynarski, 1977; Klembara, 1981, 1985, 1986; Młynarski
restricted to the territories of the New World. The Glypto- et al., 1982, 1984; Rocek, 1984; Venczel and Sen, 1994;
saurinae consists of exclusively fossil members recorded Tempfer, 2009). Hence, our knowledge of the anatomy of
in North America and Eurasia in deposits dated from the
the vertebral column and ribs of the members of the
Late Cretaceous to the Late Oligocene (Sullivan, 1979;
Anguinae clade is very limited.
Estes, 1983; Böhme, 2007).
The phylogenetic position of P. apodus is contested.
In general, the fossil history of the clade Anguinae is
Some morphological analyses find an unresolved relation
well documented from the Cenozoic of Europe
to Anguis and Ophisaurus (Klembara et al., 2014). Molec-
(e.g., Fejérváry-Lángh, 1923; Rage and Augé, 1993; Klem-
 nanský et al., 2015; Klembara and Rum- ular and some morphological data suggest a position of
bara, 2012; Cer Anguis and P. apodus within Ophisaurus, although there
mel, 2018), however, most of the finds are represented is no consistency about the exact position within this
only by isolated elements like jaws, skull bones, verte- group (Conrad et al., 2011; Pyron et al., 2013; Zheng and
brae, and osteoderms. In such cases, it is very difficult to Wiens, 2016).
associate different types of skeletal elements to a single The present study has the following aims:
species. Besides this, there is a lack of comparative stud- 1. The detailed anatomical description of the vertebral
ies of the skeletons of the extant forms. The oldest known column and ribs of P. apodus and their comparisons with
representative of Pseudopus (P. ahnikoviensis Klembara, those of Ophisaurus (living in three continents—North
2012) comes from the early Miocene (MN 2) of Germany Africa, South-East Asia, and North America, including
 nanský et al., 2015), although its earlier appearance
(Cer very rare species, e.g., Ophisaurus sokolovi) and Anguis,
cannot be excluded (see Cer nanský et al., 2016). In addi- to determine the distinguished features of these three
tion to P. ahnikoviensis, four other species of Pseudopus extant anguine genera. This will serve as a reference for
are known in the Cenozoic of Eurasia: P. confertus (early other comparative anatomical studies of any other angui-
Miocene of Europe), Pseudopus laurillardi (early-middle morph, extant, or extinct (such a study is crucial for the
Miocene of Europe), P. pannonicus (late Miocene-middle determination of the abundant record of the fossil post-
Pleistocene of Central and Eastern Europe), and cranial elements).
P. apodus (late Pleistocene-Recent; Klembara et al., 2010; 2. To test the hypothesis regarding the loss of the
Klembara, 2012, 2015; Klembara and Rummel, 2018). zygapophyseal articulation between the atlas and axis
Extant P. apodus inhabits open to poorly vegetated envi- during the transition from limbed to serpentiform body
ronments of arid and sub-arid territories of the South-  nanský (2016) observed that in members of the
form. Cer
East Europe and West and Central Asia (Obst, 2004). clade Scincoidea such a loss is present during this tran-
Pseudopus apodus feeds on various invertebrates like sition. Our aim is to find out whether similar morpholog-
slugs with or without shells, insects, and small verte- ical changes occurred also within the members of the
brates, mostly young rodents and lizards. Rifai clade Anguidae. For such purposes, members of Gerrho-
et al. (2005) reported that the stomach of this species con- notinae (Abronia, Mesaspis and Barisia) and Diploglossi-
tained both arthropods (88.7%) and molluscs (5.3%), and nae (Celestus) will be compared with members of
Çiçek et al. (2014) reported that insects are the Anguinae.
VERTEBRAL COLUMN AND RIBS OF PSEUDOPUS APODUS 3
3. To study, whether the peramorphic heterochronic TABLE 2. Specimens of Pseudopus apodus observed
process, which was identified in the evolution of the
Skulls of dry specimens
P. apodus lower jaw and skull (Klembara et al., 2014, Specimen number skull length (snout-occipital condyle
2017a), can be recognized also in the vertebrae of this distance)
species. Heterochrony is a change in timing and rate of DE 10 (juvenile) 26 mm
the developmental events in descendant relative to tim- DE 58 (juvenile) 21.8 mm
ing and rate of the developmental events in the ancestor DE 4 (adult) 39.4 mm
(Alberch et al., 1979; McNamara, 1986). We evaluate the DE 6 (adult) 46 mm
ontogenetic, and/or growth stages of anguines in the con- DE 8 (adult) 36 mm
text of their phylogeny. The potential heterochronic pro- DE 52 (adult) 40 mm
cesses are identified on the basis of the comparison of DE 53 (adult) 36.5 mm
Disarticulated skulls of dry specimens
adult and juvenile morphology of the descendant with Specimen number
those of the adult and juvenile morphology of the ances- juveniles: BSPG 1982 X 2383, DE 9
tor. The aim is to detect the possible occurrence of the DE 11 (3 months old)
ancestral adult morphology in a descendant juvenile adults: DE 1, DE 3, DE 13, DE 22, DE 23, DE 29, DE 54, DE
stage of development as it was detected in the case of sev- 59
eral cranial features of P. apodus (Klembara et al., 2014, Specimens preserved in alcohol
2017a), Specimen number head length (snout-middle ear distance)
4. To compare the shape of selected vertebrae among DE 61a (juvenile) 18.8 mm
different anguid species using geometric morphometrics DE 62a (juvenile) 23.4 mm
DE 64a (subadult) 33.5 mm
in order to recognize phylogenetic or ecological patterns DE 55a (adult) 46 mm
in morphospace distribution. Specimen stained in toto for cartilage (Alcian blue) and bone
(alizarin red) and preserved in glycerine (g)
Specimen number head length
MATERIALS AND METHODS DE 104 g (adult) 34.5 mm
The terminology of the individual structures of the Specimens used for micro CT
given bones are primarily from Fejérváry-Lángh (1923), Specimen number head/skull length
DE 11 (juvenile)—disarticulated
Hoffstetter and Gasc (1969), Romer and Parsons (1977),
DE 61a (juvenile) 18.8 mm
Estes (1983), and Conrad (2006). For institutional abbre- DE 62a (juvenile) 23.4 mm
viations, see Table 1. In total, we examined nine anguine DE 64a (subadult) 33.5 mm
species, representing all described extant genera: Pseudo- DE 1 (adult)—disarticulated
pus (Table 2), Ophisaurus, and Anguis (Table 3). Addi- DE 4 (adult) 39.4 mm
tionally, several morphological characters from other DE 8 (adult) 36 mm
anguid taxa were examined, but not described in detail DE 13 (adult)—disarticulated
(Abronia, Barisia, Mesaspis, and Celestus—see Table 3). DE 27 g (adult) 32.5 mm
DE 52 (adult) 40 mm
DE 55a (adult) 46 mm
Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging Specimens photographed using SEM
Specimen number
A GE Phoenix nanotom VR 180 X-ray tomography DE 13 (adult), DE 22 (adult)—disarticulated
nano-CTVR system at the Slovak Academy of Sciences in Histological sections
Bratislava was used (Fairfield, CT) for micro-computed Specimen number head length
tomography imaging (μCT)-scanning of the specimens. DE 109 (3 months old juvenile) 16 mm
The X-ray tube was fitted with a tungsten target, microfo-
cusing mode M0 was used and no filtering was applied for
outgoing X-ray radiation. Accelerating voltage was typi-
cally set to U5120 kV and beam current to I,580 lA; these
parameters were optimized for each CT scan. In each
TABLE 3. Additional lizard taxa observed for
comparisons
TABLE 1. Institutional abbreviations Species specimen number(s)
Anguis fragilis DE 14-21, 24, 25, 45-48, 102a, 103a
Abbreviations Institution Location
Ophisaurus ventralis DE 34, 35, 38, 99a, 100a; AMNH
AMNH American Museum of Natural USA 73057; UF 52539; CM 1411; ZFMK 27411, 95,414
History New York O. attenuatus DE 32, 33, 43, 44
BSPG Bayerische Staatssammlung für Germany O. compressus DE 50; ZFMK 32194
Paläontologie Munich O. mimicus DE 49
CM Carnegie Museum of Natural USA O. koellikeri DE 30, 41; ZFMK 13118, 13,119
History Pittsburg O. harti DE 36, 37, 56, 57, 86; AMNH 34956; ZFMK 9472
DE Department of Ecology, Faculty of Slovakia O. sokolovi ZFMK 91063
Natural Sciences, O. gracilis DE 42
Comenius University in Bratislava Abronia graminea DE 67
FMNH The Field Museum Chicago USA Barisia rudicollis DE 68-70
UF University of Florida Gainesville, USA B. imbricata NHMUK 92.9.5.32
ZFMK Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Germany Mesaspis monticola DE 71, 72
Alexander Celestus enneagrammus FMNH 108860
Koenig Bonn Eumeces schneideri DE 60
4 
CER 
NANSKÝ ET AL.

Fig. 1. Pseudopus apodus (Pallas, 1,775): Anterior region of vertebral column of DE 55 in (A) lateral, (B) dorsal, and (C) ventral aspects. (D) Region
around sacral portion in lateral aspects.
VERTEBRAL COLUMN AND RIBS OF PSEUDOPUS APODUS 5

Fig. 2. Pseudopus apodus (Pallas, 1,775): Atlas of DE 55 in (A) dorsal, (B) ventral, (C) lateral (compared to the size of axis), (D) lateral, (E) anterior,
and (F) posterior aspects.
6 
CER 
NANSKÝ ET AL.

Fig. 3. Pseudopus apodus (Pallas, 1,775): Axis of DE 55 in (A) dorsal, (B) ventral, (C) lateral, (D) anterior, and (E) posterior aspects.

measurement, 1,800 projections were recorded. The CT data ZFMK 32194, O. gracilis DE 42, O. harti ZFMK 9472,
sets were analyzed using Avizo 8.1 and the outlines of the O. koellikeri ZFMK 13118, O. ludovici ZFMK 91690,
vertebrae and ribs were manually selected using the magic O. sokolovi ZFMK 91063, O. ventralis ZFMK 95414.
wand tool. Surface meshes were exported as ply format files For geometric morphometric analyses, we have chosen
for the geometric morphometric analyses. Celestus ennea- vertebra 2 (cervical 2, axis, CV2), vertebra 4 (second post-
grammus was scanned using University of Texas High- axis vertebra, CV4), vertebra 23 (trunk vertebra, TV),
Resolution X-ray CT facility (see Digimorph.org, 2002) . sacrals 1 and 2 (SV1, SV2), and caudal vertebral
1 (KV) for each specimen. For each vertebra, we defined
3D-Geometric Morphometrics of Vertebral 13 homologous landmarks, which were added to the sur-
face meshes of each vertebra using the software “land-
Shapes
mark” (Wiley et al., 2005). We did not include the atlas to
The following 10 specimens were used in the 3D the analysis, because it has great anatomical disparity
geometric morphometric analysis (the exact position of each and it is difficult to define homologous landmarks. The
vertebra is known due to scanning of complete specimens): landmark data were transferred to PAST version 3.15
Pseudopus apodus DE 55, DE 64, Anguis fragilis DE (Hammer et al., 2001) and Procrustes modified. The Pro-
102a, Abronia graminea DE 67, Ophisaurus compressus crustes procedure removed translation, size and rotation
VERTEBRAL COLUMN AND RIBS OF PSEUDOPUS APODUS 7

Fig. 4. Pseudopus apodus (Pallas, 1,775): The fourth (second postaxis) vertebra of DE 55 in (A) dorsal, (B) ventral, (C) lateral, (D) anterior, and (E)
posterior aspects.

effects. Classical cluster analyses were performed for all position varies, most commonly they are in the middle of
vertebrae. Afterwards, the same vertebrae of all species the ventral surface of the centrum but they can be located
were analyzed separately as covariance-matrices by prin- more or less anteriorly or posteriorly. The sutures
cipal component analyses (PCA) to see whether there are between centrum and intercentrum are absent. The inter-
regional patterns specific for the respective vertebrae. centra in the caudal region are present in the form of hae-
mal arches (haemapophyses) on the ventral surface of
RESULTS each vertebra. The zygosphenes and zygantra are absent.
The articular facets of both prezygapophyses and postzy-
Adult Morphology
gapophyses are oval, being more or less laterally
Here, we describe the morphology of vertebrae and ribs expanded. The prezygapophyses are laterodorsally ori-
of the adult specimens of P. apodus (Fig. 1) in detail. The ented and, anteriorly, they overreach the centrum of the
typical vertebra of the adult is procelous with the cen- vertebra. The postzygapophyses have a ventrolateral ori-
trum in shape of a conical frustrum. The cotyles and con- entation and posteriorly they do not reach the level of the
dyles are depressed—oval to kidney shape. The cotyles end of the condyle. In dorsal view, the prezygapophyses
have an anteroventral orientation. The condyles are pos- as well as postzygapophyses have approximately the
terodorsally oriented and they lack a precondylar con- same length. The anterolaterally located synapophyses
striction. The intercentra are present on the ventral face are dorsoventrally oriented and slightly inclined posteri-
of the centra in the first few presacral vertebrae. Their orly. They extend in slightly anteroposterior direction
8 
CER 
NANSKÝ ET AL.

Fig. 5. Pseudopus apodus (Pallas, 1,775): Dorsal vertebra of DE 23 (26th vertebra) in (A) dorsal, (B) ventral, (C) lateral, (D) anterior, and (E)
posterior aspects.

from the anterior edge of the ventral region of the cen- other lepidosaurs, it is composed of three parts—the two
trum to the base of the prezygapophyses. atlantal (neural) arches whose pedicles rest on each side
Since it is difficult to distinguish the cervical region of the ventrally located first intercentrum. The neural
from the trunk region in limbless forms (Romer, 1956; arch is formed from the lower part—above mentioned
Hoffstetter and Gasc, 1969), we have divided the verte- thick pedicles, which bears anterior and posterior articu-
bral column into three regions: presacral, sacral, and cau- lar facets (articular portion) and the upper part—lami-
dal region. The number of all vertebrae varies from nae, which frame the neural canal (neural portion). They
151 to 154. There are 54 (DE 23) to 55 (DE 13) vertebrae are wedge shaped, being anteriorly inclined. There is no
in the presacral region. There is one sacral vertebra; how- dorsal contact of the laminae, but a small gap is present.
ever, the first caudal vertebra may be considered as the In large specimens (e.g., DE 13 or DE 52), the dorsome-
second sacral (Hoffstetter and Gasc, 1969). The number of dial margins of the arches attach very closely to each
caudal vertebrae in our specimens varies from 95 to 97. other. These ones have a dorsal contact but are not fused.
As mentioned, the number of vertebrae in the presacral The transverse process is small, forming only a postero-
region is usually 55. The atlas, axis, and the third vertebra laterally expanded bulge on the base of each atlantal
are ribless. The fourth vertebra is the first one bearing a arch. It represents a vestige of the synapophyses. The
rib. Apart from the first three, the synapophyses of all the posterodorsal process is short, having no articular facet
presacral vertebrae are well-developed. The first few ante- on the ventral side. It reaches further posteriorly than
rior presacral vertebrae possess keeled intercentra. the transverse process. The first intercentrum bears a
well-developed robust ventral keel that is oriented poster-
oventrally. It is ovoid in lateral view, having a rounded
Atlas
margin and being thin in anterior view. In lateral view,
The atlas is present in a form of atlantal ring that is its maximum anteroposterior width is bigger than its dor-
attached to the anterior region of the axis (Fig. 2). Like in soventral height. The keel reaches a deeper level
VERTEBRAL COLUMN AND RIBS OF PSEUDOPUS APODUS 9

Fig. 6. Pseudopus apodus (Pallas, 1,775): The first sacral vertebra of DE 55 in (A) dorsal, (B) ventral, (C) lateral (compared to the size of the
second sacral vertebra), (D) lateral, (E) anterior, and (F) posterior aspects.
10 
CER 
NANSKÝ ET AL.

Fig. 7. Pseudopus apodus (Pallas, 1,775): The second sacral vertebra of DE 55 in (A) dorsal, (B) ventral, (C) lateral (compared to the size of the
first sacral vertebra), (D) lateral, (E) anterior, and (F) posterior aspects.
VERTEBRAL COLUMN AND RIBS OF PSEUDOPUS APODUS 11

Fig. 8. Pseudopus apodus (Pallas, 1,775): The first caudal vertebra of DE 55 in (A) dorsal, (B) ventral, (C) lateral, (D) anterior, and (E) posterior
aspects.

ventrally than the second intercentrum. The height of the level of the half of the atlantal ring. It ends bluntly. On
atlantal ventral crest is approximately the same as the the lateral wall of the centrum, approximatelly in the
height of the articular portion of the atlantal arch, and anterior third, a well developed although short synapo-
the maximum width of it is 1.5 of its height. The dorsal physis is present. It is expanded posterolaterally, being
surface of the intercentrum bears two articular facets, the slightly inclined ventrally in anterior view. Prezygapo-
anterior, and posterior, respectively. Together with the physeal articulations are completely missing and the sup-
articular facets of neural arches anteriorly, these articu- porting structures remain only as small vestiges. The
lar facets form two articular surfaces, which provide the postzygapophyses have large elliptical (or roughtly
articulation with the occipital condyle of the skull. In square; more elongated than in other presacral vertebrae)
anterior view, the maximum size of the anterior one is articulation surfaces, oriented more or less posteriorly.
larger than the size of lateral articulations on the pedi- The posterior end of the axis centrum forms a dorsally
cles. The posterior articular facets open more widely than depressed condyle, which is kidney shaped in posterior
the anterior ones and contact the odontoid process of view. This condyle is not so markedly developed as it is in
the axis. other vertebrae. Ventrally, there is a long, slightly poste-
riorly curved keel, formed by the robust second intercen-
trum. The anterior region of the second intercentrum
Axis
forms a large area for a contact with the first intercen-
The centrum of the axis is large and robustly built, trum. In lateral view, there is a small notch on the ante-
being extended anteroposteriorly (Fig. 3). In ventral view, rior margin of the second intercentrum. Its posteroventral
its lateral margins are almost straight, rendering the ver- region is fused to the third intercentrum. In the upper
tebral body rhomboidal in shape. Anteriorly, the odontoid region, a small oval fenestra is located between them (how-
process is fused to the centrum. The sutures between the ever, this can vary—they can be completely fused into a
centrum of the axis and the odontoid process (= the atlan- single crest). The third intercentrum is posteroventrally
tal pleurocentrum) are usually not visible, or only small oriented, having a straight course.
traces of the fusion are still present in some specimens. The neural canal is roughtly pentagonal in shape and
The anterior projection of the odontoid process is short, small. Its dorsal end reaches the level of postzygapo-
dorsally inclined, and protrudes approximately to the physes and the entire hight of canal forms only 23% of
12 
CER 
NANSKÝ ET AL.

Fig. 9. Pseudopus apodus (Pallas, 1,775): The fourth left rib of DE 55 in (A) medial, (B) lateral, (C) anterior, and (D) posterior aspects.

the entire axis hight. In lateral view, the neural spine is neck vertebrae. Ventrally, the centra of these vertebrae
ax shaped, having a rounded dorsal margin. It reaches its (including atlas and axis) are keeled (bearing hypapo-
highest level in its posterior section, whereas the height physes). Hypapophyses of the third and forth vertebra
decreases anteriorly. The anterior region protrudes far are well developed (Fig. 4). All consecutive ones gradually
more anteriorly relative to that of the posterior expansion become reduced up to a faint medial ridge on the last ver-
of posterior region. Although the anterior region runs tebra. The neural spine of the third vertebra differs from
close to the level of the end of the odontoid process, this the posteriorly located one by its more pronounced poste-
region never exceeds this level. The posterior region rior inclination, exceeding the level of posterior end of the
approximately reaches the level of the condyle. In dorsal condyle. Moreover, it has a narrower appearence in lat-
view, the width of the neural spine is constant in the first eral view than others. The dorsal region of the neural
half of its entire anteroposterior length. Then, it widens arch of typical mid-trunk vertebra slightly rises in height
gradually posteriorly having a small notch at its end. posteriorly. The neural spine is square in shape in lateral
Thus, the whole neural spine forms a structure of a view (Fig. 5). It starts to rise dorsally approximatelly at
reversed letter Y. the mid level of the entire length of the neural arch. Ante-
riorly, a low medial ridge runs to the end of the neural
arch, where it forms a small spike. In lateral view, the
Postaxis Presacral Vertebrae
dorsal margin of the neural spine is almost straight. It
In all postaxis presacral vertebrae, there is a strong does not exceed the condyle posteriorly. In dorsal view, it
tendency to uniform morphology, probably associated gradually widens only slightly in posterior direction. Its
with limb reduction and multipication of vertebral seg- height remains constant across the entire length of presa-
ments (Hoffstetter and Gasc, 1969). There are, however, cral region.
few characteristic features that can be attributed to verte- The neural canal is oval and small. Pre and postzygapo-
brae belonging to a certain part of the vertebral column. physes are well expanded laterally. They are dorsally
The relative size of vertebrae increases regularly from inclined in an angle of 39 degree. Articular surfaces are
anterior to posterior (especially seen in the first seven large, elliptical, and oblong laterally. Posteriorly, the postzy-
vertebrae—including atlas and axis; these vertebrae are gapophyses reach only the level of the base of the condyle,
smaller than the posteriorly located ones and their size but the condyle itself reaches further posteriorly. The inter-
gradually increases posteriorly in all dimensions). The zygapophyseal constriction is well developed and deep.
first few postaxis presacral vertebrae have relatively The synapophyses are well developed, especially from the
short centra compared with posterior presacrals—the fourth vertebra, where the first ribs appear. The synapo-
length of the centrum of the first postaxis vertebra is physes are slightly posterolaterally oriented and their length
approximatelly half of the length of the last presacral ver- remains approximately the same throughout the entire ver-
tebra. There is an abrupt presacral shortening of the cen- tebral column. As the length of the vertebrae increases in
trum of the last three presacral vertebrae, however, the posterior direction, the ratio of the two lengths decreases.
centra are never smaller than the centra of the first pre- Subcentral foramina of the last vertebrae are small and elon-
sacral vertebrae. Besides their relative smaller size, the gated, forming an incision on each side of the medial plane.
first presacrals have several morphological differences The subcentral ridges are straight and gradually
from other presacral vertebrae and could be considered as become closer from anterior to posterior region. The
VERTEBRAL COLUMN AND RIBS OF PSEUDOPUS APODUS 13

Fig. 10. Pseudopus apodus (Pallas, 1,775): Juvenile morphology, axis of DE 62a in (A) lateral aspect with separation of its parts. (B) In lateral
aspect in normal anatomical position of its parts. Dorsal vertebra of BSPG 1982 X 2383 in (C) dorsal, (D) ventral, (E) lateral, (F) anterior, and (G)
posterior aspects.
14 
CER 
NANSKÝ ET AL.

Fig. 12. Comparison of atlas in (A) dorsal, (B) ventral, (C) lateral, (D)
anterior, and (E) posterior aspects.

Fig. 11. Comparison of atlas in (A) dorsal, (B) ventral, (C) lateral, (D)
anterior, and (E) posterior aspects (continued in the following figure).

whole ventral region of the centrum is flat; only around


the cotyle, there is a small bulge. The pair of small sub-
central foramina is located in the anterior third of the
centrum.

Sacral Vertebrae
According to Hoffstetter and Gasc (1969) there is one
sacral vertebra, however the authors suggested that the
next posteriorly located caudal vertebra can be considered
as the second sacral. Unlike the first sacral vertebra
(Fig. 6), the second one usually bears chevron bones
which form haemal arches ventrally (DE 13). However,
the overall morphology of this vertebra is more similar to
that of the first sacral than the posteriorly located caudal
vertebrae. In addition, in DE 55, we have observed a total
absence of the haemal arch on the second sacral vertebra
(Fig. 7). Therefore, we follow the definition of Hoffstetter
and Gasc (1969) and we consider this vertebra as the sec-
ond sacral.
The first sacral vertebra lacks a haemal arch (Fig. 6).
The subcentral foramina on the ventral surface of the ver-
tebra run into the incisions, extending posteriorly along
both sides of the medial line of the centrum. The centrum
is significantly shorter than the centrum of the anteriorly
located vertebrae, and its length is approximately the
same as the length of the vertebrae in the middle part of
the presacral region. The condyle is oval rather than kid-
ney shaped. The cotyle is oval as well, although its ven-
tral margin is almost straight. This margin is V shaped Fig. 13. Comparison of axis in (A) dorsal, (B) ventral, (C) lateral, (D),
in ventral view. The height of neural spine is the same as anterior, and (E) posterior aspects (continued in the following figure).
VERTEBRAL COLUMN AND RIBS OF PSEUDOPUS APODUS 15
seem more robust than the pleurapophyses of the first
sacral. Distally, they are also forked and in the middle of
the bifurcation there is an opening of the transverse
canal. In comparison to the first sacral, they are not as
long. There is no contact of the pleurapophyses of the first
and second sacral vertebrae. The chevron bones are pre-
sent, forming a posteroventrally oriented haemapophysis.
The neural canal is thinner laterally relative to the neu-
ral canal of the first sacral.

Caudal Vertebrae
The length of the longest caudal centrum is not bigger
than the length of the centrum of any presacral vertebra.
Posteriorly, there is a strong tendency toward the elonga-
tion of the centra and a relative reduction of all processes.
In general, caudal centra are relatively slimmer than presa-
cral ones. Anteroposteriorly, the ventral face of the centrum
is slightly concave with a shallow groove on each side of the
medial plane. In posterior caudal vertebrae, the condyle is
separated from the centrum of the vertebra by a sharp inci-
sion that, however, cannot be interpreted as precondylar
constriction. From the posterolateral margins of the cen-
trum, the haemapophyses arise posteroventrally (they are
fused to the centrum). The tip overreaches the posterior
margin of the condyle. The angle between the ventral part
of the centrum and anterior margin of the haemapophyses
increases distally. The height of the haemapophysal canal
is the same as the length of the distal part of the haemapo-
physes. In anterior vertebrae, the haemapophyses have the
same length as the length of the vertebrae, however, poste-
riorly they shorten. The anterolateral corners of the cen-
trum bear dorsoventrally flattened pleurapophyses. The
Fig. 14. Comparison of axis in (A) dorsal, (B) ventral, (C) lateral, (D)
anterior, and (E) posterior aspects.

in all presacral vertebrae, but it is anteroposteriorly


short, having a rectangular appearance in lateral view.
The length of the dorsal margin of the spine is almost half
of the length of the spines of preceding vertebrae.
The typical feature of sacral vertebrae is the presence
of pleurapophyses. They are large, lateroventrally ori-
ented, and forming long processes. They are broad, espe-
cially on their bases, almost reaching the length of the
centrum without the condyle. They slightly widen ventro-
laterally, expanding from the centrum to the level where
they reach the half of their length. The anterior
section ends here, forming a small anterior spina. The
posterior section runs further and it is posteriorly
inclined in lateral view. It becomes thinner distally, being
bluntly ended. The anterior edge of the pleurapophysis
runs continuously into the ventral margin of the cotyle.
The total length of pleurapophyses does not extend the
dorsal length of the vertebra (measured from the ventral
margin of the centrum to the dorsal end of the neural
spine). On the ventral face, at the base of each pleurapo-
physis, there is an opening of the transverse canal that
connects the posterior lymphatic hearts and the median
perivascular lymphatic space (Hoffstetter and Gasc,
1969). The distal part of the pleurapophysis articulates
with the ilium, which has a ventrolateral orientation. The
connection is via a ligament. As mentioned above, the
morphology of the second sacral vertebra (Fig. 7) strongly Fig. 15. Comparison of the fourth (second postaxis) vertebra (A)
resembles that of the first sacral. The pleurapophyses dorsal, (B) ventral, (C) lateral, (D) anterior, and (E) posterior aspects
gradually slightly widen distally, and, therefore, they (continued in the following figure).
16 
CER 
NANSKÝ ET AL.

Fig. 17. Comparison of dorsal vertebra in (A) dorsal, (B) ventral, (C)
lateral, (D) anterior, and (E) posterior aspects (continued in the following
figure).

articular facet and several outgrowths. The dorsoventrally


Fig. 16. Comparison of the fourth (second post-axis) vertebra in (A) oriented articular facet is of oval shape, and it meets the syna-
dorsal, (B) ventral, (C) lateral, (D) anterior, and (E) posterior aspects. pophysis of the corresponding vertebra. Posterodorsally from
the base of the facet, a relatively robust posterodorsal process
anterior edges of the pleurapophyses are slightly concave, arises. In biggest ribs, it is almost as long as the horizontal
and they protrude straight from the centrum behind the
cotyle. The posterior edges of the pleurapophyses arise from
the middle of the centrum and they are anterolaterally ori-
ented. The pleurapophyses of the first two caudal vertebrae
are slightly wider (Fig. 8) than the pleurapophyses of the
rest of caudals. Anteriorly, the prezygapophyses overreach
the cotyles. There is a faint ridge connecting the prezygapo-
physes and pleurapophyses. The postzygapophyses do not
overreach the condyles posteriorly. The ratio between the
size of the zygapophyses and the length of the centrum
decreases distally. From the posterior part of the neural
arch, a neural spine arises. It is posterodorsally oriented.
The caudal spines are, contrary to the presacrals, slim and
tall, and in the distal part of the vertebral column, they
overreach the posterior margin of the condyle. Distally they
gradually shorten and slope down to the postzygapophyses.
No transverse autotomic split is present in any caudal ver-
tebrae. However, almost all caudals possess an autotomy
foramen at the base of each pleurapophyses.

Ribs
Atlas, axis, and the third vertebra possess no ribs, all other
presacral vertebrae bear ribs attached to the synapophyses
(Fig. 1A–C). A typical rib is holocephalous (Fig. 9). It has two
segments—a long proximal needle-like bony segment and a
small distal cartilaginous segment of triangular shape. All
ribs extend outward from the vertebrae and downward along
the flanks of the body. Ventrally, they come very close Fig. 18. Comparison of dorsal vertebra in (A) dorsal, (B) ventral, (C)
together but never meet. On the head of the rib, there is an lateral, (D) anterior, and (E) posterior aspects.
VERTEBRAL COLUMN AND RIBS OF PSEUDOPUS APODUS 17
diameter of the facet. On the anterior edge of the rib, there is
a tiny anteroventral pinching. The rib is anteroposteriorly
flattened and a strong ridge runs dorsally from the head to
the distal end of the rib. The ridge and the border of the ante-
roventral pinching meet distally and thus create a small pro-
longed area of triangular shape. As mentioned above, the ribs
are needle like but distally, they are slightly widened at the
very end. As it is impossible to distinguish cervical vertebrae
from thoracic vertebrae, it is also impossible to do so with the
ribs. However, the most anterior ribs are shorter and their
posterodorsal processes are more subtle than the processes in
more posterior ribs. Distally, the ribs regularly prolongate.
The last two pairs of presacral ribs are significantly shorter
than the preceding ribs (Fig. 1D).

Posthatchling Morphology of Vertebrae


Atlas. The atlas of juvenile specimen DE 54 is thinner
in lateral view when compared to that of the adult. The Fig. 19. Comparison of dorsal vertebrae of (A, D) Pseudopus apodus,
(B, E) Ophisaurus ventralis, and (C, F) Anguis fragilis. (A–C) ventral and
neural canal is large and, therefore, neural arches are lon-
(D–F) anterior aspects. The red dotted line indicates different courses of
ger relative to the ventral portion of the atlas. The laminae the subcentral ridges. Note that the ratio of the cotyle and neural canal
of the neural arch widen dorsally rather than narrow in height in Ophisaurus represents a different character state (blue color)
lateral view. They have a more or less dorsal course rather relative to that in Pseudopus and Anguis (red color).
than being anteriorly inclined. Transverse processes are
short and laterally oriented rather than posteriorly.
anteroposterior length of the hypapophysis is shorter
than the maximum length of the remaining portion of the
Axis. The axis of young Pseudopus apodus consists of
atlas.
four separated elements (Fig. 10A,B): vertebral body,
odontoid process or atlantal pleurocentrum and two inter-
centra. The morphology of the corpus resembles those of
Axis. 4. The neural canal reaches dorsally the level of
the following postaxis vertebrae.
the postzygapophysis. In Anguis and Ophisaurus, the dor-
sal portion of the neural canal reaches dorsally to the
Post-Axis Presacral Vertebrae. The vertebrae are deli- level of the postzygapophyses (for comparison see Figs. 13
cately built (Fig. 10C–G). The neural canal is large, having and 14).
almost the same height as the cotyle. The neural spine is 5. The odontoid process is inclined anterodorsally in an
low with a rounded (convex) dorsal margin. The subcentral angle of about 130 degree relative to the horizontal plane.
ridges are not as straight as they are in adults, but they In Anguis and Ophisaurus, the odontoid process is always
have a slightly concave appearance. The pre and postzyga- less inclined. The exception is the axis of O. koellikeri, in
pophyses are small, oriented more or less in anteroposter-
ior direction rather than being distinctly laterally
expanded. Moreover, they are less dorsally inclined rela-
tive to those in adults.

Diagnostic Characters
Our study shows morphological differences of the verte-
brae of Pseudopus relative to those of Anguis and Ophi-
saurus. The Recent P. apodus is distinguished from the
extant species of Ophisaurus and Anguis by the following
diagnostic characters:

Atlas. 1. Anterior margin of the hypapophysis reaches


anteriorly to the level of the anterior margin of the neural
arch. In Anguis and Ophisaurus, the anterior margin of
the hypapophysis lies posteriorly to the anterior level of
the neural arch (for comparison see Figs. 11 and 12).
2. In lateral view, the laminae of the neural arch are
distinctly narrowed anterodorsally and have a pointed
termination. In Anguis, the laminae are relatively antero-
posteriorly wider and their termination is oblique. In
Ophisaurus, the dorsal portions of laminae are distinctly
anteroposteriorly wide.
3. The anteroposterior length of the hypapophysis is Fig. 20. Comparison of the first sacral vertebra in (A) dorsal, (B)
bigger than the maximum length of the remaining portion ventral, (C) lateral, (D) anterior, and (E) posterior aspects (continued in
of the atlas. In Anguis and Ophisaurus, the the following figure).
18 
CER 
NANSKÝ ET AL.

prezygapophyses reach ventrally to the level of the roof of the


neural canal (for comparison see Figs. 15 and 16).
8. In the median plane, the height of the cotyle is
markedly bigger than the height of the neural canal. In
Anguis and Ophisaurus, the height of the cotyle is smal-
ler than the height of the neural canal.
9. The triangular hypapophysis, in lateral view, is
anteroposteriorly longer than high. In Anguis and Ophi-
saurus, the hypapophysis is distinctly elongated; the
exception is O. gracilis in which the hypapophysis is only
weakly developed.

Remaining presacral vertebrae. 10. The neural spine is


of square shape. It is only slightly inclined posteriorly. In
Anguis and Ophisaurus, the neural spine is trapezoidal
and the length of its basal portion is bigger than the height
of the neural spine (for comparison see Figs. 17 and 18).
11. The lateral margins of the centrum (subcentral
ridges) are straight (see Fig. 19A) rather than concave
(Ophisaurus) or parallel with their anterior-most sections
Fig. 21. Comparison of the first sacral vertebra in (A) dorsal, (B) being expanded laterally (Anguis).
ventral, (C) lateral, (D) anterior, and (E) posterior aspects. 12. The height of the neural canal is distinctly smaller
than the height of the cotyle (Fig. 19D). The same condi-
which the dorsal inclination of the odontoid process is still tion is similar to that of O. harti, however, the overall
bigger than that of P. apodus. morphology of the vertebra of this species is different to
6. In posterior view, the dorsal margin of the condyle is that of P. apodus.
more or less concave. In Anguis and Ophisaurus, the dor- 13. In ventral view, the centrum is wide, its mid-width
sal margin of the condyle is convex. forms 62% of the maximum anteroposterior length of the
centrum. In Anguis, the centrum is narrow with its mid-
width forming only 40% of the maximum anteroposterior
length of the centrum. In Ophisaurus, the centrum is mod-
Fourth presacral vertebra. 7. In anterior view, the lateral erately wide, its mid-width relative to the maximum ante-
margins of the prezygapophyses reach dorsally to the level of roposterior length ranges from 42% (in O. compressus) to
the roof of the neural canal. In Anguis and Ophisaurus, the 51% (in O. ventralis). One exception is only O. harti, where
the ratio is 59%.

Fig. 22. Comparison of the second sacral vertebra in (A) dorsal, (B)
ventral, (C) lateral, (D) anterior, and (E) posterior aspects (continued in Fig. 23. Comparison of the second sacral vertebra in (A) dorsal, (B)
the following figure). ventral, (C) lateral, (D) anterior, and (E) posterior aspects.
VERTEBRAL COLUMN AND RIBS OF PSEUDOPUS APODUS 19
Sacral vertebrae. 14. In anterior view, the pleurapo- mid-length portion of the neural arch. The exception is the
physes gradually narrow distally having a straight course vertebra of O. koellikeri, in which the conditions are similar
along their entire length. In Ophisaurus, the distal ends to those of Pseudopus (for comparison see Figs. 24 and 25).
of the pleurapophyses are more or less flexed ventrally. 20. The cotyle is rounded in shape and not markedly
In Anguis, the distal ends of the pleurapophyses are depressed. In Anguis and Ophisaurus, the cotyle is
widely bifurcated (for comparison see Figs. 20–23). depressed.
15. In dorsal view, there is no bifurcation of the pleura- 21. In lateral view, the neural spine gradually narrows
pophysis into the anterior and posterior branches and its dorsally. In Anguis and Ophisaurus, a more-or-less dis-
distal margin is only shallowly embayed. In Anguis and tinct constriction is present in about the mid-length of the
Ophisaurus, the bifurcation of the pleurapophysis is pre- neural spine.
sent. In O. ventralis, the space between the anterior and 22. The vertebra is short; the posteromedial margin of the
posterior branches is filled by a thin bony lamella. pleurapophysis partly overlap the anterior margin of the
16. Small neural canal; in anterior view, its height postzygapophysis in ventral view. In Anguis and Ophisaurus,
forms only 16% of the entire height of the vertebra (mea- the vertebra is more-or-less elongate; the pleurapophyses do
sured from the ventral margin of the cotyle to the dorsal not reach the articulation facets of postzygapophyses and
end of the neural spine). In Anguis, the height of the neu- there is a more-or-less gap between these structures.
ral canal forms 26% and in Ophisaurus, the ratio ranges
from 21% (only in O. harti) to 27%. The rest of caudal vertebrae. 23. The autotomic split in
17. The cotyle is rounded in shape and not markedly caudal vertebrae is absent, only autotomic foramina are
depressed. In Anguis and Ophisaurus, the depressed developed. In Anguis and Ophisaurus, the autotomic split
cotyle is present. is present, well visible (see Hoffstetter and Gasc, 1969).
18. In lateral view, the neural spine gradually narrows
dorsally. In Anguis and Ophisaurus, a more-or-less dis-
tinct constriction is present in about the mid-length of the Ophisaurus. The recent species of Ophisaurus are dis-
neural spine. tinguished from the extant species of Pseudopus apodus
and Anguis fragilis by the following diagnostic characters
(for comparison see Figs. 11–25):
First caudal vertebra. 19. In dorsal view, the medial
margin of the prezygapophysis lies at the level medially to 1. In the lateral aspect, the anteroposterior length of the
the lateral margin of the mid-length portion of the neural
arch. In Anguis and Ophisaurus, the medial margin of the dorsal portion of the lamina of the atlas neural arch is
prezygapophysis lies at the level of the lateral margin of the

Fig. 24. Comparison of the first caudal vertebra in (A) dorsal, (B)
ventral, (C) lateral, (D) anterior, and (E) posterior aspects (continued in Fig. 25. Comparison of the first caudal vertebra in (A) dorsal, (B)
the following figure). ventral, (C) lateral, (D) anterior, and (E) posterior aspects.
20 
CER 
NANSKÝ ET AL.

bigger than the anteroposterior length of its ventral 5. The height of the neural canal is slightly bigger than
portion. In Pseudopus and Anguis, the anteroposterior the height of the cotyle (Fig. 19E).
length of the ventral portion of the lamina of the atlas 6. The anterior branch of the pleurapophysis is more
neural arch is always bigger than the length of its dor- robustly developed than the posterior branch. In Pseu-
sal portion. dopus, there in only very indistinctly developed ante-
2. The maximum height of the intercentrum of the atlas rior branch; the posterior branch is well developed. In
is smaller than the half the height of the remaining Anguis, the posterior branch is more robustly devel-
portion of the atlas. In Pseudopus and Anguis, the oped than the anterior branch.
height of the intercentrum is bigger than the half of
the remaining portion of the atlas. Anguis. The recent species A. fragilis is distinguished
3. The condyle of the axis is depressed and of elliptical from the extant species of Ophisaurus and Pseudopus apo-
dus by the following diagnostic characters (for comparison
shape in posterior aspect. It is kidney shaped in Pseu- see Figs. 11–25):
dopus and rounded in Anguis.
4. The lateral margins (subcentral ridges) of the dorsal 1. In the axis, the second intercentrum is distinctly
vertebrae are concave (Fig. 19B). shorter and thinner than the third intercentrum. In

Fig. 26. Landmarks of vertebra used for morphometric analyses.


VERTEBRAL COLUMN AND RIBS OF PSEUDOPUS APODUS 21
Pseudopus and Ophisaurus, the second intercentrum 4. Except of a short anterior section, the entire dorsal
is equally or almost as large as the third margin of the neural spine of the axis is straight and
intercentrum. horizontally oriented in lateral aspect. In Pseudopus
2. The condyle of the axis is rounded in shape, whereas it and Ophisaurus, the dorsal margin is
is kidney shaped in Pseudopus and depressed in anteroventrally–posterodorsally inclined.
Ophisaurus. 5. The lateral margins of the centrum of dorsal vertebrae
3. In dorsal view, the posterior section of the third are almost parallel and their anterior-most sections
intercentrum is well visible and its length equals one are expanded laterally (Fig. 19C). There is a slight
third of the entire length of the neural spine. constriction immediately posterior to the subcentral

Fig. 27. Cluster analysis of all data illustrating similarity of vertebrae in all species (A) and of (B) the second vertebrae (CV2, axis); (C) the fourth
vertebrae (CV4); (D) the middle trunk vertebrae (TV); (E) the first sacral vertebrae; (F) the second sacral vertebrae (SV2); (G) the first caudal vertebrae
(KV1) illustrating similarity of vertebrae in all species. Abbreviations: CV, cervical vertebra; TV, trunk vertebra; KV, caudal vertebra; SV, sacral
vertebra; AF, Anguis fragilis; AG, Abronia graminea; OA, Ophisaurus attenuatus; OC, O. compressus; OG, O. gracilis; OH, O. harti; OK, O. koellikeri;
OL, O. ludovivi; OM, O. mimicus; OS, O. sololovi; OV, O. ventralis; PA, Pseudopus apodus.
22 
CER 
NANSKÝ ET AL.

foramina (Klembara, 1981: fig 3). As for the condi- Pseudopus and Ophisaurus, the pleurapophyses are
tions in Pseudopus and Ophisaurus, see Figure 19. distinctly ventrolaterally directed.
6. The haemal arches of the first sacral vertebra are 8. The bifurcation of the pleurapophyses of the first
long and ventrally fused one to another. In O. harti sacral vertebra is visible in anterior and posterior
and Ophisaurus mimicus, only the vestiges of the views, by which the posterior branch is more ven-
proximal portions of the haemal arches are present. trally located than the anterior one. In Pseudopus
7. The pleurapophyses of the first sacral vertebra are and Ophisaurus, both branches more or less overlap
laterally and only slightly ventrally directed. In one another in anterior and posterior views.

Fig. 28. Principal component analysis (PC1/PC2) of (A) the second vertebrae (CV2, axis) of all species, (B) fourth vertebrae (CV4) of all species,
(C) the middle trunk vertebrae (TV), (D) the first sacral vertebrae (SV1), (E) the second sacral vertebrae (SV2), (F) the first caudal vertebrae (KV1) of all
species. Abbreviations: CV, cervical vertebra; TV, thoracal vertebra; KV, caudal vertebra; SV, sacral vertebra; AF, Anguis fragilis; AG, Abronia
graminea; OA, Ophisaurus attenuatus; OC, Ophisaurus compressus; OG, Ophisaurus gracilis; OH, Ophisaurus harti; OK, Ophisaurus koellikeri; OL,
Ophisaurus ludovivi; OM, Ophisaurus mimicus; OS, Ophisaurus sololovi; OV, Ophisaurus ventralis; PA, Pseudopus apodus.
VERTEBRAL COLUMN AND RIBS OF PSEUDOPUS APODUS 23
9. In lateral view, the haemal arch of the first caudal
vertebra is markedly posteriorly directed, in an angle
of 40 degree (from the horizontal plane). In Pseudo-
pus and Ophisaurus, the angle is always bigger—
the haemal arch is more ventrally directed.
10. In anterior and posterior views, the dorsoventral
length of the mutual contact of the rami of the hae-
mal arch of the first caudal vertebra is short, always
shorter than that of Pseudopus and Ophisaurus.
11. The neural spine of the first caudal vertebra is short;
its height equals that of the neural canal in anterior
and posterior views. In Pseudopus and Ophisaurus,
the height of the neural spine is always bigger.

Geometric Morphometric Analyses


Cluster analyses. The cluster analysis of all vertebrae
(for landmarks see Fig. 26) shows a general separation in
neck vertebrae on the one side and in postcervical verte-
brae on the other side (Fig. 27). With few exceptions, a sep-
arate clustering of CV2 and CV4 exists, and most sacral
and caudal vertebrae cluster together. Within the postcer-
vical cluster of vertebrae, the trunk vertebrae are broadly
distributed in the similarity diagram. The most distin-
guished vertebrae are the caudal vertebra of P. apodus
and the second vertebra of Ophisaurus mimicus.
The clustering of all CV2s shows O. mimicus to be most
distinct from all other species of our sampling (Fig. 27B).
Abronia graminea and A. fragilis cluster together. All
other species form a diverse clustering with P. apodus Fig. 29. The atlas-axis complex of gerrhonotine lizard body form
inside. anguid (A–G) Abronia graminea (DE 67) and (H-N) Barisia rudicollis
The clustering of all CV4s shows O. ventralis to be (DE 69) in (A) lateral, (B) dorsal, (C) ventral, (D) anterior, and (E) posterior
most disctinct from all other species (Fig. 27C). The aspects. Axis in (F) lateral and (G) anterior aspects.
clustering of the Ab. graminea and An. fragilis resem-
bles the phylogenetic arrangement of those species
compared to the Ophisaurus/Pseudopus-group (Pyron
PC1/2 of CV4 shows Abronia graminea separated from
et al., 2013; Zheng and Wiens, 2016). In the latter,
all other species (Fig. 28B). Anguis fragilis and all other
P. apodus is clustering separately from Ophisaurus
species cluster together except for Ophisaurus ventralis,
species.
which, apparently, shows a very distinct anatomical
The clustering of all TVs shows the best representation
shape of CV4.
of molecular phylogenies (Pyron et al., 2013; Zheng and
Wiens, 2016) with Ab. graminea opposing all Anguinae.
For Anguinae, An. fragilis opposes all other anguines
(Fig. 27D). P. apodus clusters inside the Ophisaurus/
Pseudopus-group and three of the four North-American
species cluster together.
The clustering of all SV1s and all SV2s shows Ab. gra-
minea opposing all Anguinae and P. apodus deep inside
the cluster of the remaining species (Fig. 27E,F).
The clustering of all KVs shows P. apodus to be most
distinct from all other species in our sampling (Fig. 27G).
All other species form a diverse clustering with Ophi-
saurus and Abronia and Anguis cluster together inside a
larger cluster.

Principal component analyses. The PCA of all data pro-


vide a great overlap of species (now shown). The PCA of
CV2 (PC1/2) shows Abronia graminea and Anguis fragilis
distinct from all other species, possibly resembling a close
phylogenetic position of both species (Fig. 28A). All other Fig. 30. The atlas–axis complex of diploglossine anguid Celestus
species cluster together with the exception of Ophisaurus enneagrammus FMNH 108860 in (A) lateral, (B) dorsal, (C) ventral, (D)
mimicus, which apparently has a very distinct anatomy anterior, and (E) posterior aspects. Axis in (F) lateral and (G) anterior
of the axis. aspects.
24 
CER 
NANSKÝ ET AL.

PC1/2 of TV again shows Abronia graminea and Anguis Heterochrony in the evolution of Pseudopus apodus
fragilis separated from all other species (Fig. 28C). Pseu- was previously confirmed for the lower jaw and skull
dopus apodus is most similar to the three separate clus- characters (Klembara et al., 2014, 2017a). It was demon-
terings of the Ophisaurus-species as well as to the strated that several cranial features present in the juve-
outgroup representatives indicated by its central position niles of P. apodus are present (1) in the adults of
in the “web” of the minimal span tree. phylogenetically more basal species of Pseudopus like late
PC1/2 of SV1 shows Abronia graminea separated from Miocene and Pliocene species P. pannonicus (Fejérváry-
all other species (Fig. 28D). Anguis fragilis and Pseudo- Lángh, 1923; Tempfer, 2004) and early Miocene species
pus apodus cluster together with all remaining species. P. laurillardi (Klembara et al., 2010) and Pseudopus
PC1/2 of SV2 shows Ab. graminea and An. fragilis sepa- ahnikoviensis (Klembara, 2012; Klembara et al., 2014,
rated from all other species and P. apodus cluster 2017b); (2) in the adults of the other species of the sub-
together with all remaining species, which, however, family Anguinae (species of Ophisaurus and Anguis); and
show a broad disparity (Fig. 28E). (3) in the adults of the earliest potential anguines like
PC1/2 of KV1 shows a broad clustering of all species Ophisauriscus quadrupes from the middle Eocene of
except for Pseudopus apodus, which, apparently, has a Germany (Sullivan et al., 1999; Klembara et al., 2017b;
very distinct anatomy of the first caudal vertebra Klembara and Rummel, 2018), Early Cretaceous Odaxo-
(Fig. 28F). saurus piger (Meszoely, 1970; Klembara et al., 2017b) and
PC1/2 of all vertebrae always show more than 50% the adults of basal outgroup taxa (Klembara et al., 2017a,
shape variance. Other PC-axes do not show any obvious 2017b). It was also shown, that several lower jaw and
ecological or phylogenetic pattern. skull bones of the adults of the most basal species of Pseu-
dopus (early Miocene P. ahnikoviensis and P. laurillardi)
exhibit the morphology of the adults of Recent and fossil
DISCUSSION AND COMPARISON Ophisaurus and Anguis (Klembara, 2012). From this
The elongated, serpentiform body and leg reduction results that the ancestral adult morphology is that exhib-
have evolved convergently in numerous reptilian and ited by the adults of the most basal members of Pseudo-
amphibian lineages for adaption to different environ- pus and the adults of Ophisaurus and Anguis. In this
ments, and thus such a transformation represents an context, it was demonstrated that the peramorphosis (the
important biological phenomenon. As was previously occurrence of the ancestral adult morphology in a descen-
 nanský (2016), the transition from lizard dant juvenile stage of development; McNamara, 1986) is
observed by Cer
responsible for the morphology of certain cranial features
body form to serpentiform morphology shows some evolu-
present in adults of P. apodus (Klembara et al., 2014,
tionary patterns in the atlas–axis complex as well.
2017a).
Although zygapophyseal articulation between atlas and
We present here two cases in which the morphology of
axis is well developed in limbed gerrhonotine anguids, for
the juvenile vertebrae of Pseudopus apodus exhibit sev-
example, Abronia (Fig. 29A–G), Mesaspis, and Barisia
eral features very similar to those in the adults of Ophi-
(Fig. 29H–N), it is absent in the limbless Anguinae
saurus. These features are as follows:
representatives—Pseudopus, Anguis, and Ophisaurus. In
the diploglossine anguid Celestus, which shows some
degree of body elongation and limb reduction, vestiges of 1. In juveniles of Pseudopus apodus, the cotyle of the
zygapophyses are present, but without articular surfaces dorsal vertebra is large, but its height is almost the
(Fig. 30). Thus, our study brings further evidence of same as the height of the neural canal. This condition
 nanský (2016) about the loss of this
hypothesis of Cer is similar to that of adults of Recent Ophisaurus
articulation in forms with reduced or absent limbs. In ser- (cf. Figs. 10F and 19), adults of the middle Miocene
pentiform lizard Anniella pulchra, the connection through
Ophisaurus sp. (Cer nanský and Klembara, 2017),
zygapophyseal articulation is completely absent (although
it should be noted that Anniella is specialized, showing adults of the late Oligocene Anguinae indet. (Augé,
the reduction of postzygapophyses of the axis as well; see 2005), adults of the middle Eocene Ophisauriscus
Rieppel, 1980: Fig. 26f ). In contrast, well developed zyga- quadrupes (Sullivan et al., 1999) and also adults of
pophyseal articulation between atlas and axis is present the basal outgroup taxa like the anguimorph Xeno-
in for example, Shinisaurus crocodilurus, an anguimorph
which represents a lizard body form (see Conrad,
saurus grandis (Hecht and Costelli, 1969) and scincid
2006: Fig. 2). Eumeces schneideri.
The first intercentrum in Anguinae representatives is 2. In early juvenile specimens of Pseudopus apodus, the
oriented ventrally or more often inclined posteriorly. Only subcentral ridges (lateral margins of the centrum) of
in O. sokolovi is the first intercentrum slightly inclined dorsal vertebrae are not as straight as in adults, but
anteriorly. However, in Abronia, the robust atlantal inter-
centrum is markedly inclined anteriorly, reaching futher
they are slightly concave. Such morphology of the
anteriorly than all other atlas portions. The atlas–axis dorsal vertebrae of juveniles of P. apodus resembles
complex of other lizard clades was previously studied in that of the adults of recent Ophisaurus (cf. Figs. 10D
 nanský et al. (2014: Chamaeleonidae) and
detail by Cer and 19), as well as many other finds within the Ophi-
 nanský (2016: Scincoidea).
Cer saurus clade like Ophisaurus sp. from the late Eocene
of England (Meszoely and Ford, 1976; cf. Anguine
Heterochrony in the Evolution of Vertebrae of
Morphotype B, Klembara and Green, 2010), Ophi-
Pseudopus apodus saurus sp. from the middle Miocene of Slovakia
VERTEBRAL COLUMN AND RIBS OF PSEUDOPUS APODUS 25
 nanský and Klembara, 2017) and Asia (Vasilyan
(Cer manuscript. For CT data of Celestus enneagrammus, we
et al., 2016), O. canadensis from the late Miocene of thank J. Maisano.
Canada (Holman, 1970) and Ophisaurus (Dopasia)
sp. from the Pliocene of Italy (Delfino et al., 2011). LITERATURE CITED
This feature is very important for the evaluation of Alberch P, Gould SJ, Oster GF, Wake DB. 1979. Size and shape in
the fossil material in which the dorsal vertebrae of the ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 5:296–317.
juvenile Pseudopus may be interpreted as represent- Augé M. 2005. Évolution des lézards du Paléogène en Europe. Mém
Mus nat d’Hist natur 192:1–369.
ing those of the adult Ophisaurus or vice versa (see Bachmayer F, Młynarski M. 1977. Bemerkungen über die fossilen
also Klembara, 1981). The slightly concave lateral Ophisaurus-Reste (Reptilia, Anguinae) von Österreich und Polen.
margins of the centrum of the dorsal vertebrae exhibit Sitz-Ber Österr Akad Wiss Math-naturwiss Kl Abt I 186:285–299.
Böhme M. 2007. Herpetofauna (Anura, Squamata) and palaeocli-
also the middle Eocene Ophisauriscus quadrupes matic implications: Preliminary results. Ann Naturhist Mus Wien
(Kuhn, 1940; Klembara, 1981; Sullivan et al., 1999) 108:43–52.
and a scincid Eumeces schneideri.  nanský A. 2016. From lizard body form to serpentiform morphol-
Cer
ogy: The atlas–axis complex in African cordyliformes and their Rel-
Thus, the two above vertebral characters, together with atives. J Morphol 277:512–536.
six cranial characters (Klembara et al., 2014, 2017a), sup-  nanský A, Boistel R, Fernandez V, Tafforeau P, Le Noir N,
Cer
port the hypothesis that a peramorphic heterochronic pro- Herrel A. 2014. The atlas-axis complex in chamaeleonids
cess may have played role in the evolution of certain (Squamata: Chamaeleonidae), with description of a new anatomical
skeletal features of Pseudopus apodus, very likely reflect- structure of the skull. Anat Rec 297:369–396.
 nanský A, Klembara J. 2017. A skeleton of Ophisaurus
Cer
ing an increasing body size of this taxon during its
(Squamata: Anguidae) from the middle Miocene of Germany, with
evolution.
a revision of the partly articulated postcranial material from Slova-
kia using micro-computed tomography. J Vert Paleont 37:
Geometric Morphometric Analyses e1333515.
 nanský A, Klembara J, Müller J. 2016. The new rare record of
Cer
The geometric morphometric analyses revealed a gen-
the late Oligocene lizards and amphisbaenians from Germany and
eral separation of the limbed species Abronia graminea its impact on our knowledge of the European terminal Palaeogene.
from the remaining sampling. This could indicate that Palaeobiodivers Palaeoenviron 96:559–587.
the vertebral column largely differentiated in limbless  nanský A, Rage J-C, Klembara J. 2015. The early Miocene squa-
Cer
forms compared to limbed anguids. This is particularly mates of Amöneburg (Germany): The first stages of modern squa-
true for SV1 and SV2. mates in Europe. J Syst Palaeontol 13:97–128.
It is worth mentioning that Pseudopus apodus almost Çiçek K, Tok CV, Hayretda g S, Ayaz D. 2014. Data on the food com-
always clusters within Ophisaurus-species, which agrees position of European glass lizard, Pseudopus apodus (Pallas, 1775)
with the phylogenetic findings of molecular studies (Pyron (Squamata: Anguidae) from Çanakkale (Western Anatolia, Tur-
et al., 2013; Zheng and Wiens, 2016), which recovered Pseu- key). Acta Zool Bulg 66:433–436.
dopus always within that clade. The performed Procrustes Conrad J. 2006. Postcranial skeleton of Shinisaurus crocodilurus
(Squamata: Anguimorpha). J Morphol 267:759–775.
analysis reduced size parameters and made all species,
Conrad J. 2008. Phylogeny and systematic of Squamata (Reptilia)
including P. apodus, comparable for the geometric morpho- based on morphology. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 310:1–182.
metric analysis. The analyses revealed that the vertebrae of Conrad JL, Ast JC, Montanari S, Norell MA. 2011. A combined evi-
P. apodus do not drastically derivate in their anatomical dence phylogenetic analysis of Anguimorpha (Reptilia: Squamata).
shape (PC-scores) when compared to all other species. Only Cladistics 27:230–277.
the first caudal vertebra shows distinctly different shape Delfino M, Bailon S, Pitruzzella G. 2011. The Late Pliocene amphib-
parameters in P. apodus, which could be related to a special- ians and reptiles from “Capo Mannu D1 Local Fauna” (Mandriola,
ized locomotion related to the large body size of this species. Sardinia, Italy). Geodiversitas 33:357–382.
For the axis, we found a largely distinct pattern for the Digimorph.org. 2002–2012. Digital morphology: A national Science
small species Ophisaurus mimicus. This anatomy could foundation digital library at the University of Texas at Austin.
Austin: The High Resolution X-ray Computed Tomography Facility
indicate a special ecological adaptation, maybe in regard at the University of Texas at Austin http://www.digimorph.org/.
to fossoriality, feeding, and/or combat behavior, in which Estes R. 1983. Encyclopedia of paleoherpetology, Part 10 A-Sauria
head/neck mobility is of particular importance. We can terrestria, Amphisbaenia. New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag. p 248.
most likely exclude miniaturization as reason for this pat- Fejérváry-Lángh AM. 1923. Beiträge zu einer Monographie der fossi-
tern as also the geometric morphometry of other verte- len Ophisaurier. Palaeont Hung 1:123–220.
brae of this species would be expected to modify based on Gans C, Gasc JP. 1990. Tests on the locomotion of the elongate and
miniaturization processes. In O. ventralis, we found a limbless reptile Ophisaurus apodus (Sauria: Anguidae). J Zool 220:
derived pattern of neck vertebral anatomy, that is, CV4, 517–536.
which could be interpreted in a similar manner. Gans C, Montero R. 2008. An Atlas of Amphisbaenian Skull Anat-
omy. In: Gans C, Gaunt CS, Adler K, editors. Biology of the reptilia.
Vol 21: : Morphology I. Ithaca: Society for the Study of Amphibians
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS and Reptiles. p 621–738.
Hammer , Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. Past: Paleontological sta-
We are indebted to Prof. W. Böhme (Zoologisches For-
tistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeon-
schungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany) for tol Electronica 4:9.
the borrowing of specimens of Ophisaurus for the μCT Hecht MK, Costelli J. 1969. The postcranial osteology of the lizard
scannings. We thank M. Augé (Museum national d’His- Shinisaurus. 1 The vertebral column. Am Mus Novit 2378:1–21.
toire naturelle Paris), A. Bolet (University of Bristol), and Hilgendorf F. 1885. Die Steinheimer Gürtelechse Propseudopus fraa-
one anonymous reviewer for their critical reading of the sii. Z Dtsch Geol Ges 37:358–376.
26 
CER 
NANSKÝ ET AL.
Hoffstetter P, Gasc JP. 1969. Vertebrae and ribs of modern reptiles. Młynarski M, Szyndlar Z, Estes R, Sanchiz B. 1984. Amphibians and
In: Gans C, editor. Biology of the reptilia. Vol. 1: Morphology A. reptiles from the Pliocene locality of Weže II near Dzialoszyn
New York: Academic Press. p 201–210. (Polen). Acta Palaeontol Pol 29:209–226.
Holman AJ. 1970. Herpetofauna of the wood mountain formation Obst FJ. 2004. Pseudopus apodus (Pallas, 1775). In: Gasc JP,
(upper Miocene) Saskatchewan. Can J Earth Sci 7:1317–1325. Cabela A, Crnobrnja-Isailovic J, Dolmen D, Grossenbacher K,
Klembara J. 1981. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Subfamilie Anguinae. Haffner P, Lescure J, Martens H, Martínez J, Rica P, et al., editors.
Acta Univ Carol Geol 2:121–168. Atlas of amphibians and reptiles in Europe. Paris: Muséum
Klembara J. 1985. Über eine Panzerschleiche aus dem Frühmiozän national d’Histoire naturelle. p 198–199.
von Rott bei Bonn (Reptilia: Anguidae). Bon zool Beitr 36:99–103. Pallas PS. 1775. Lacerta apoda descripta. Novi Comment Acad Scient
Klembara J. 1986. New finds of the genus Ophisaurus (Reptilia, Imper Petrop 19:435–454.
Anguidae) from the Miocene of Western Slovakia (Czechoslovakia). Pyron RA, Burbrink FT, Wiens JJ. 2013. A phylogeny and revised
Acta Univ Carol Geol 2:187–203. classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and
Klembara J. 2012. A new species of Pseudopus (Squamata, Anguidae) snakes. BMC Evol Biol 13:93.
from the early Miocene of North-West Bohemia (Czech Republic). J
Rage JC, Augé ML. 1993. Squamates from the Cainozoic of the West-
Vert Paleontol 32:854–866.
ern part of Europe: A review. Rev Paléobiol 7:199–216.
Klembara J. 2015. New finds of anguines (Squamata, Anguidae) from
the Early Miocene of North-West Bohemia (Czech Republic). Rieppel O. 1980. The phylogeny of anguinimorph lizards. Basel: Nat-
Paläont Z 89:171–195. urforschenden. p 86.
Klembara J, Böhme M, Rummel M. 2010. Revision of the anguine liz- Rifai L, Baker MB, Shafei DA, Disi A, Mahasneh A, Amr Z. 2005.
ard Pseudopus laurillardi (Squamata, Anguidae) from the Miocene Pseudopus apodus (Pallas, 1775) from Jordan, with notes on its
of Europe, with comments on paleoecology. J Paleont 84:159–196. ecology (Sqamata: Sauria: Anguidae). Herpetozoa 18:133–140.
Klembara J, Green B. 2010. Anguimorph lizards (Squamata, Angui- Rocek Z. 1984. Lizards (Reptilia: Sauria) from the Lower Miocene
morpha) from the middle and upper eocene of the Hampshire Basin locality Dolnice (Bohemia, Czechoslovakia). Rozpravy
of Southern England. J Syst Palaeont 8:97–129. 
Ceskoslovenské Akademie vied; rada matematických a prírodních
Klembara J, Dobiašová K, Hain M, Yaryhin O. 2017a. Skull anatomy ved 94:1–69.
and ontogeny of legless lizard Pseudopus apodus (Pallas, 1775): Romer AS. 1956. Osteology of the reptiles. Chicago: The University of
Heterochronic influences on form. Anat Rec 300:460–502. Chicago Press. p 772.
 nanský A. 2017b. The first record of angu-
Klembara J, Hain M, Cer Romer AS, Parsons TS. 1977. The vertebrate body. 5th
ine lizards (anguimorpha, anguidae) from the early Miocene local- ed. Philadelphia: Saunders College Publishing. p 624.
ity Ulm—Westtangente in Germany. Hist Biol 1–12. https://doi. Sullivan R, Keller T, Habersetzer J. 1999. Middle Eocene (Geiseltalian)
org/10.1080/08912963.2017.1416469 anguid lizards from Geiseltal and Messel, Germany. I. Ophisauriscus
Klembara J, Hain M, Dobiašová K. 2014. Comparative anatomy of quadrupes Kuhn 1940. Cour Forsch-Inst Senckenberg 216:97–129.
the lower jaw and dentition of Pseudopus apodus and the interrela- Sullivan RM. 1979. Revision of the Paleogene genus Glyptosaurus
tionships of species of subfamily Anguinae (Anguimorpha, Angui- (Reptilia, Anguidae). Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 163:1–72.
dae). Anat Rec 297:516–544. Tempfer MP. 2004. The herpetofauna (Amphibia: Caudata, Anura;
Klembara J, Rummel M. 2018. New material of Ophisaurus, Anguis Reptilia: Scleroglossa) of the Upper Miocene locality Kohfidish,
and Pseudopus (Squamata, Anguidae, Anguinae) from the Miocene Burgerland, Austria. PhD thesis, Faculty of Natural Sciences and
of the Czech Republic and Germany and systematic revision and Mathematics, University of Vienna, 183 p.
palaeobiogeography of the Cenozoic Anguinae. Geol Mag 155:
Tempfer PM. 2009. The early Vallesian vertebrates of Atzelsdorf
20–44.
(Late Miocene, Austria). 3 Squamata, Scleroglossa. Ann Naturhist
Kuhn O. 1940. Die Plakosauriden und Anguiden aus dem mittleren
Mus Wien 111:489–498.
Eozän des Geiseltales. Nova Acta Leopoldina (nf ) 8:461–486.
Lande R. 1978. Evolutionary mechanisms of limb loss in tetrapods. Vasilyan D, Böhme M, Klembara J. 2016. First record of fossil Ophi-
Evolution 32:73–92. saurus (Anguimorpha, Anguidae, Anguinae) in Asia. J Vert Paleont
Lee MSY, Oliver PM, Hutchinson MN. 2009. Phylogenetic uncer- 36:e1219739.
tainty and molecular clock calibrations: A case study of legless liz- Venczel M, Sen S. 1994. Pleistocene amphibians and reptiles from
ards (Pygopodidae, Gekkota). Mol Phylogenet Evol 50:661–666. Emirkaya-2. Turkey Herpetol J 4:159–165.
McNamara KJ. 1986. A guide to the nomenclature of heterochrony. J Wiley DF, Amenta N, Alcantara DA, Ghosh D, Kil YJ, Delson E,
Paleont 60:4–13. Harcourt-Smith W, Rohlf FJ, St. John K, Hamann B, et al. 2005.
Meszoely C. 1970. North American fossil anguid lizards. Bull Mus Evolutionary morphing. In: Proceedings of IEEE Visualization,
Comp Zool 139:87–149. MN, USA.
Meszoely C, Ford R. 1976. Eocene glass-lizard Ophisaurus Zheng Y, Wiens JJ. 2016. Combining phylogenomic and supermatrix
(Anguidae) from the British Islands. Copeia 1976:407–408. approaches, and a time-calibrated phylogeny for squamate reptiles
Młynarski M, Szyndlar Z, Estes R, Sanchiz B. 1982. Lower vertebrate (lizards and snakes) based on 52 genes and 4162 species. Mol Phy-
fauna from the Miocene of Opole. Estud geol 38:103–119. logenet Evol 94:537–547.

View publication stats

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen