INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND R

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

P
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per
KRA
Outstanding
QET
(5)
Basic 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality Modeled effective
Education Knowledge and applications of content applications of content
knowledge within and
Services Pedagogy knowledge within and across across curriculum
curriculum teaching areas. teaching areas as
shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 8

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4

lessons as evidenced
by MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 of
the other MOV given

Timeliness

Basic 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, completed

Education colleagues in the conduct and and disseminated
action research with
Services application of research to colleagues
enrich knowledge of content
and pedagogy.

7.5%
Basic 2. Collaborated with
Education colleagues in the conduct and
Services application of research to
enrich knowledge of content P
Weight
MFOs KRAs and pedagogy.
Objectives Timeline Per
KRA
Outstanding
QET
(5)
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 of
the given MOV

Timeliness Presented the

research report within
the rating period

Basic 3. Developed and applied Quality Demonstrated

Education effective teaching strategies to effective teaching
strategies to promote
Services promote critical and creative critical and creative
thinking, as well as other thinking, as well as
higherorder thinking skills. other higherorder
thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 8

7.5%
Efficiency Submitted 4 or more
lessons as evidently
shown in MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 of
the other MOV given

Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Worked with colleagues to Quality Modeled and shared
Education Environment and model and share effective effective classroom
JOYCE S. management
BAULITA
Services Diversity of EMELEEN A. CON-UI
techniques in the strategies that engage
Learners management of classroom learners in activities/
structure to engage learners, tasks done in different
individually or in groups, in physical learning
meaningful exploration, environments as
shown in MOV 1 with
discovery and hands-on a rating of 8
activities within a range of 7.5%
physical learning
environments.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4
lessons supported by
MOV 1 and any 1 of
the other acceptable
MOV

Timeliness
 Environment and
Diversity of
Learners

P
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per
KRA
Outstanding
QET
(5)
Basic 5. Exhibited effective and Quality Exhibited effective
Education constructive behavior and constructive
behavior management
Services management skills by skills by applying
applying positive and non- positive and non-
violent discipline to ensure violent discipline to
learningfocused ensure
environments. learningfocused
environments shown
in MOV 1 with a rating
7.5% of 8

Efficiency Applied at least 7 of

the given strategies as
observed in at least 4
lessons

Timeliness
Basic 6. Worked with colleagues to Quality Worked with
Education share differentiated, colleagues at least in
the district/cluster
Services developmentally appropriate level to share lesson
opportunities to address
learners’ differences in
gender, needs, strengths,
Efficiency Submitted at least 1
interests and experiences. 7.5% lesson as evidently
shown in MOV 1 and
supported by any
acceptable MOV

Timeliness
 P
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per
KRA
Outstanding
QET
(5)
Basic 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and applied Quality Developed and
Education Planning effective strategies in the applied effective
strategies showing
Services planning and management of developmentally -
developmentally sequenced sequenced teaching
teaching and learning and learning process
processes to meet curriculum as shown in MOV 1
requirements and varied with a rating of 8
teaching contexts.
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4
lessons as evidenced
by MOV 1 and 2 and
supported by any 1 of
the other acceptable
MOV

Timeliness
Basic 8. Reviewed with colleagues, Quality Consistently led
Education teacher and learner feedback collaborative reviews
of teacher and learner
Services to plan, facilitate and enrich feedback as
teaching practice. evidenced by the
MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted 4
collaborative reviews
7.5% of teacher and learner
feedback as evidently
shown in MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 of
the acceptable MOV

Timeliness
 P
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per
KRA
Outstanding
QET
(5)
Basic 9. Advised and guided Quality Consistently advised
Education colleagues in the selection, colleagues in the
selection,
Services organization, development organization,
and use of appropriate development and
teaching and learning appropriate use of
resources, including ICT, to teaching and learning
address specific learning resources as shown in
the MOV submitted
goals.

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4

teaching and learning
resources as
evidenced by at least
1 of the acceptable
MOV

Timeliness
Basic 4. Assessment and 10. Worked collaboratively Quality Consistently reviewed
Education Reporting with colleagues to review the collaboratively
assessment tools with
Services design, selection, organization colleagues as shown
and use of a range of effective in the MOV submitted
diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment
strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements. 7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4
assessment tools as
evidently shown in
any of the acceptable
MOV

Timeliness
 4. Assessment and
Reporting

P
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per
KRA
Outstanding
QET
(5)
Basic 11. Interpreted collaboratively Quality Consistently
Education monitoring and evaluation collaborated with
colleagues in the
Services strategies of attainment data interpretation of
to support learner progress assessment data as
and achievement. shown in the MOV
submitted
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 2

different types of MOV

Timeliness
Basic 12. Applied skills in the Quality Consistently applied
Education effective communication of skills in the effective
communication of
Services learner needs, progress and learner needs and
achievement to key progress to parents/
stakeholders, including guardians as shown in
parents/guardians. the MOV submitted

7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 3 of

the acceptable MOV

Timeliness
 P
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Per
KRA
Outstanding
QET
(5)
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various related Quality Consistently
Education works/activities that contribute performed special
tasks and/or
Services to the teaching-learning assignments as
process shown in the MOV
submitted
10%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4
different kinds of
acceptable MOV

Timeliness

_____________________________ _______________
RATER RA
AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV
Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Rating

Actual Results Score
Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q E T Ave
(4) (3) (2) (1)
Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective No acceptable
applications of content applications of content applications of content evidence was shown
knowledge within and knowledge within and knowledge within and
across curriculum across curriculum across curriculum
teaching areas as teaching areas as teaching areas as
shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5

Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson as No acceptable 0

as evidenced by MOV as evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 evidence was shown
1 from colleagues and 1 from colleagues and from colleagues and
supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of
the other MOV given the other MOV given the other MOV given

Conducted and Conducted action Proposed action No acceptable

completed action research with research with evidence was shown
research with colleagues colleagues
colleagues

0
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Rating
Actual Results Score
Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q E T Ave
(4) (3) (2) (1)
0
Submitted any 3 of the Submitted any 2 MOV Submitted any 1 No acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV evidence was shown

Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable

research report within research report within research report within evidence was shown
the rating period the rating period the rating period

Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable

effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching evidence was shown
strategies to promote strategies to promote strategies to promote
critical and creative critical and creative critical and creative
thinking, as well as thinking, as well as thinking, as well as
other higherorder other higherorder other higherorder
thinking skills as thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5

0
Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson as No acceptable
as evidently shown in as evidently shown in evidently shown in evidence was shown
MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported
by any 1 of the other by any 1 of the other by any of the other
MOV given MOV given MOV given

Submitted
Modeled and shared Modeled and shared Modeled and shared No acceptable
effective classroom effective classroom effective classroom evidence was shown
management RHODA V. DINOY
management management
strategies that engage strategies that engage strategies that engage
learners in activities/ learners in activities/ learners in activities/
tasks done in different tasks done in different tasks done in different
physical learning physical learning physical learning
environments as environments as environments as
shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5
0

Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

supported by MOV 1 supported by MOV 1 supported by any of evidence was shown
and any 1 of the other and any 1 of the other the acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Rating
Actual Results Score
Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q E T Ave
(4) (3) (2) (1)
Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective No acceptable
and constructive and constructive and constructive evidence was shown
behavior management behavior management behavior management
skills by applying skills by applying skills by applying
positive and non- positive and non- positive and non-
violent discipline to violent discipline to violent discipline to
ensure ensure ensure
learningfocused learningfocused learningfocused
environments shown environments shown environments shown
in MOV 1 with a rating in MOV 1 with a rating in MOV 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 0

Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied any of the No acceptable

the given strategies as the given strategies as given strategies as evidence was shown
observed in 3 lessons observed in 2 lessons observed in only 1
lesson

Worked with Worked with Worked with No acceptable

colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues but no evidence shown
school level to share department or grade evidence of sharing
lesson level to share lesson with others

Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable

lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson, as evidenced evidence shown 0
shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and by either MOV 2 or 3
supported by any supported by any but no evidence of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV sharing with others
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Rating
Actual Results Score
Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q E T Ave
(4) (3) (2) (1)
Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable
applied effective applied effective applied effective evidence was shown
strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing
developmentally - developmentally - developmentally -
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
and learning process and learning process and learning process
as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

0
Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 lesson as Submitted 1 lesson as No acceptable
lessons as evidenced evidenced by shown evidenced by any 1 of evidence was shown
by MOV 1 and 2 and in MOV 1 and/or 2 the acceptable MOV
supported by any 1 of and supported by any
the other acceptable 1 of the other
MOV acceptable MOV

Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable

collaborative reviews collaborative reviews collaborative reviews evidence was shown
of teacher and learner of teacher and learner of teacher and learner
feedback as feedback as feedback as
evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

collaborative reviews collaborative reviews collaborative review of evidence was shown
of teacher and learner of teacher and learner teacher and learner 0
feedback as evidently feedback as evidently feedback as evidently
shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and shown in any of the
supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of acceptable MOV
the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Rating
Actual Results Score
Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q E T Ave
(4) (3) (2) (1)
Frequently advised Occasionally advised Rarely advised No acceptable
colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the evidence was shown
selection, selection, selection,
organization, organization, organization,
development and development and development and
appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of
teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning
resources as shown in resources as shown in resources as shown in
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted

0
Submitted 3 teaching Submitted 2 teaching Submitted 1 teaching No acceptable
and learning and learning and learning resource evidence was shown
resources as resources as as evidenced by any
evidenced by at least evidenced by at least of the acceptable
1 of the acceptable 1 of the acceptable MOV
MOV MOV

Frequently reviewed Occasionally reviewed Rarely reviewed No acceptable

collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively evidence was shown
assessment tools with assessment tools with assessment tools with
colleagues as shown colleagues as shown colleagues as shown
in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted

Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable 0

assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tool as evidence was shown
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
any of the acceptable any of the acceptable any of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Rating
Actual Results Score
Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q E T Ave
(4) (3) (2) (1)
Frequently Occasionally Rarely collaborated No acceptable
collaborated with collaborated with with colleagues in the evidence was shown
colleagues in the colleagues in the interpretation of
interpretation of interpretation of assessment data as
assessment data as assessment data as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted
0

Submitted at least 3 of Submitted at least 2 of Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable

the same kind of MOV the same kind of MOV MOV evidence was shown

Frequently applied Occasionally applied Rarely applied skills in No acceptable

skills in the effective skills in the effective the effective evidence was shown
communication of communication of communication of
learner needs and learner needs and learner needs and
progress to parents/ progress to parents/ progress to parents/
guardians as shown in guardians as shown in guardians as shown in
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted

Submitted any 3 MOV Submitted any 2 MOV Submitted any 1 MOV No acceptable
evidence was shown
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Rating
Actual Results Score
Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q E T Ave
(4) (3) (2) (1)
Frequently performed Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable
special tasks and/or performed special special tasks and/or evidence was shown
assignments as tasks and/or assignments as
shown in the MOV assignments as shown in the MOV
submitted shown in the MOV submitted
submitted
0
Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable
different kinds of different kinds of acceptable MOV evidence was shown
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

RATING FOR OVERALL

0.000
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

___________________________ ______________________________________
RATEE APPROVING AUTHORITY
   
 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating Adje

Rater - Ratee Agreement

The signature below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal and the performance rating.

Name of Employee Name of Superior

Signature Signature

Date Date

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan (Recommended

Strengths Development Needs Timeline
Developmental Intervention)

Rater Ratee
ATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Adjectival Rating

LOPMENT PLANS

Timeline Resource Needed

Approving Authority
 PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

STRENGTHS DEVELOPMENT NEEDS ACTION PLAN TIMELINE RESOURCES NEEDED

(Recommended Developmetal Intervention)

A. Functional Competencies

B. Core Behavioral Competencies

Feedback:
Ratee Rater Approving Authority
 MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
District/School: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

MID-YEAR REVIEW/RATING
WEIGHT PERFORMANCE
RATEE (Teacher) RATER (Principal) MID-YEAR REVIEW
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE MOV TARGET
PER KRA RESULTS
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

*Please see attached list of MOV

Ratee Ratee Approving Authority