59

Table 4.0 Distribution of user’s assessment of the Asset Management

System in terms of Functionality.

SUB-CHARACTERISCTICS MEAN DESCRIPTIVE

RATING
The software is performing the 4.5 Highly Functional
assigned task.
The software is producing 4.63 Highly Functional
expected results
The software can interact with 4.25 Highly Functional
other software systems.
The software is equipped with 4.5 Highly Functional
acceptable security measure.
The software is complying the user 4.63 Highly Functional
requirements.
Total 4.5 Highly Functional

Table 4.0 presents the user’s assessment of the St. Michael’s

College in terms of Functionality as reflected from the table. The first line

of the table shows the software is performing the assigned task of the

system which was interpreted highly functional with a mean of 4.5, it

implies that the system can perform the task required. In terms of The

software is producing expected results the user rated the system highly

functional with a mean of 4.63, it means that the system is accurate to

perform the given functions of the system. The software can interact with

other software system was also rated highly functional with a mean of

4.25, it indicates that the system can interact with another system. The

software is equipped with acceptable security of the system was rated

highly functional with a high of 4.5, it signifies that the system can
 60

prevent unauthorized access of the system. The software is complying

the user requirements of the system which was interpreted highly

functional with a mean of 4.63, it indicates that the system has achieved

maturity in terms of the development of the system. The overall

functionality of the system software was rated highly functional with a

mean of 4.5, it implies that the system software is functioning as

specified and delivered the functionality characteristics.

Table 4.1 Distribution of User’s assessment of the St. Michael’s College

Asset Management System in terms of Reliability.

SUB-CHARACTERISCTICS MEAN INTERPRETATION

The software can handle errors. 4.13 Reliable

The software can resume and 4.25 Highly Reliable
restore data.
The software is complying user- 4.38 Highly Reliable
reliability requirements.
Total 4.25 Highly Reliable

Table 4.1 shows the user’s assessment of the St. Michael’s College

Asset Management System in terms of Reliability, as reflected from the

table. The first line of the table shows the software can handle errors of

the system was rated reliable with a mean of 4.13, it implies that the

system is capable of handling errors. The software can resume and

restore data of the system was also rated highly reliable with a mean of

4.25, it signifies that the system can restore lost data after failure occur.
 61

As gleaned, The software is complying user-reliability requirements of the

system highly reliable with a mean of 4.38, it implies that the system

software is functioning as specified and delivered the reliability

characteristics.

Table 4.2 Distribution of users’ assessment of the St. Michael’s College

Asset Management System in terms of Usability.

SUB-CHARACTERISTICS MEAN DESCRIPTIVE

RATING
The software is easy to 4.5 Highly Usable
understand.
The software is easy to learn. 4.63 Highly Usable
The software can operate in 4.5 Highly Usable
minimal effort.
The software’s interface 4.5 Highly Usable
appealing.
The software is complying 4.13 Usable
user-usability requirements.
The software provide buttons 4.63 Highly Usable
and commands are labelled
appropriately.
The users can use the 4 Usable
system without much effort
and more training.
Total 4.41 Highly Usable

Table 4.2 presents the users’ assessment of the St. Michael’s

College Asset Management System in terms of Usability, as reflected from

the table. The first line of the table shows the software is easy to

understand of the system which was interpreted highly usable with a

mean of 4.5, it indicates that the system software is easy to perceive. The

software is easy to learn of the system was rated highly usable with the
 62

mean of 4.63, it means that the system is easy to navigate without much

effort. The software can operate in minimal effort which was interpreted

highly usable with a mean of 4.5, it indicates that the system software is

easy to operate. The software’s interface appealing was also rated highly

usable with a mean of 4.5, it implies that the interface of the system

software is user friendly. The software is complying user-usability

requirements was also rated usable with a mean of 4.13, it implies that

the interface of the system software is user friendly. The software provide

buttons and commands are labelled appropriately was also rated highly

usable with a mean of 4.63, it implies that the interface of the system

software is user friendly. The users can use the system without much

effort and more training was also rated usable with a mean of 4. As

gleaned, the Usability of the system was rated 4.41 which is interpreted

as highly usable. It implies that the users of the designed system have

the ease of use for a given function addresses the usability of the

functions is easy for them to use the system.

Table 4.3 Distribution of the user’s assessment of the St. Michael’s

College Asset Management System in terms of Efficiency.
 63

SUB-CHARACTERISTICS MEAN DESCRIPTIVE

RATING
The software is behaving in a 4.13 Efficient
timely manner.
The software is complying user- 4 Efficient
efficiency requirements.
The system automatically 4.25 Highly Efficient
captures data which can be
retrieved in speedy manner
The system supports minimum 4.13 Efficient
requirements.
Overall, the software is valuable 4.38 Highly Efficient
as a business solution of St.
Michael’s College, Iligan City.
Total 4.17 Efficient

Table 4.3 shows the user’s assessment of the St. Michael’s College

Asset Management System in terms of Efficiency, as reflected from the

table. The first line of the table shows the software is behaving in a

timely manner of the system was rated efficient with a mean 4.13, it

means that the system utilizes resources efficiently. The software is

complying user-efficiency requirements of the system was efficient with a

mean 4. The system automatically captures data which can be retrieved

in speedy manner of the system which was rated highly efficient with a

mean of 4.25, it indicates that the system can easily diagnose errors. The

system supports minimum requirements was rated efficient with a mean

of 4.13, it means that the system can be easily modified. Lastly, for the

the software is valuable as a business solution of St. Michael’s College,

Iligan City of system was rated highly efficient with a mean of 4.38, it

means that the system can be tested easily. As gleaned, the users rated
 64

the Efficiency of the system software efficient with a mean of 2.17. It

implies that the performance of the system confirms the functionality of

the system.

Table 4.4 Summary Table of users’ assessment on the St. Michael’s

College Asset Management System.

CHARACTERISTICS MEAN INTERPRETATION

Functionality 4.5 Highly Functional

Reliability 4.25 Highly Reliable

Usability 4.41 Highly Usable

Efficiency 4.17 Efficient

Total 4.33 Highly Functional

Table 4.4 presents the summary of the users’ assessment of the St.

Michael’s College Asset Management System. The overall functionality of

the system software was rated as highly functional with a mean of 4.5, it

implies that the system software is functioning as specified and delivered

the functionality characteristics. The Reliability of the system was also

interpreted highly reliable with a mean of 4.25, it implies that the system

software is functioning as specified and delivered the reliability

characteristics. In terms of Usability of the system it was also interpreted

highly usable with a mean of 4.41, it indicates that the users of the

designed system have the ease of use for a given function addresses the

usability of the functions is easy for them to use the system. The
 65

Efficiency of the system software was interpreted as efficient with a mean

of 4.13. It implies that the performance of the system confirms the

functionality of the system, It discloses that the designed system of the

researchers can adopt to changes in its environment or with its

requirements. The table describes quality of the software based on the

ISO 9126 standard. On the other hand, the researchers have seen that

the system can still be improve in terms of its functionality, reliability

and efficiency with intention to have better Asset Management System.

 66

CHAPTER 5

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

The reason of this chapter is to abridge the research and suggest

recommendations for further analysis. The objective of this study is to

provide efficient transaction for the requisition of assets, It’ll be easy and

fast in requesting assets for the office head administrators and for the

property custodian in accessing the records to manage the asset by

having a computerize system. To develop an organize list for tracking of

the assets in monitoring. Every office has a administrators to do the

inventory of the office they are assigned, It’ll be easy to the property

custodian to track the assets of the school.

5.1 Summary of Findings

Based on the result and interpretation of the data, the researchers

were able to come up with the following findings.

1. The design system makes it more easier for the office heads to

request asset from the property custodian.

2. The software system can store all the asset information in a

secure database.

3. The system makes it possible to keep track of the all the assets.

5.2 Conclusion
 67

Based on the testing, the functionality of the system was rated

highly functional with the mean of 4.5. It implies that the system

function in its essential purpose. In terms of reliability, the users rated

the system highly reliable with a mean of 4.25. It implies that the system

software delivered the reliability characteristics. For the usability of the

system the user rated the system highly usable with a mean of 4.41. It

implies that the system software delivered the reliability characteristics.

For the efficiency of the system the user rated the system efficient with a

mean of 4.17. It indicates that the performance of the system confirms

the capability of the system.

The proponents conclude that the St. Michael’s College Asset

Management System is a new innovation to provide much better way in

managing the assets. Through this system, it is accessible and hassle-

free for the property custodian to monitor which the asset can be

tracked, to manage the asset from different offices and it is efficient in

recording each of every asset. The transaction in requisition of asset is

easier and efficient for the personnel.

5.2 Recommendations

Based on the findings and conclusions of the study. These are the

following recommendations made for the future researchers:

 The proponents recommend to should have a notification for the

latest updates of the assets.

 68

 The proponents recommend to have a picture in recording of each

asset for easy recognition.

 The proponents recommend to widen the feature of the Asset

Management System, the addition of bar code scan system in

managing the assets.

 69

REFERENCE LISTS

AASHTO. (2002). American Association of State Highway and

Transportation ... Retrieved from http://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/
txdot-
info/gsd/pdf/aashto_award02.pdf

Harrison, A. (2006). SNA/M1.06/14 Fourth meeting of the Advisory

Expert Group ... Retrieved from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/
nationalaccount/AEG/papers/m4EconAssets.pdf

Watts, G. (2009). US20120304248A1 - Method and system for

information ... Retrieved from
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20120304248A1/en

Bloom, M. (2001). Retrieved from http://assetmanagement.

transportation.org/tam/aashto.nsf/docs/
8ABE00AC0977B5AC85256B1A007445F9?opendocument
&Group=TAMT78HSBZ&tab=REFERENCE

Watts, G., & Clément, S. (2009). Method and system for information
technology asset management. Retrieved from
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20120304248A1/en

Jomaquio, Joanna Marie B.;Vallespin, Maricel A.;Jomapao, Alhera L.

(2012). “Asset Management System of the Hotel and Restaurant
Management of University of Cebu Lapu-Lapu and Mandaue”

KAMARUDIN, A. (2005). Information Technology Asset Management

System Web-Based Application. Retrieved from
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/5863/1/FSKTM_2005_13(1-
24).pdf

Oliveira, L., & Martins, P. (2015). Software Asset Management in an

Organization. Retrieved from https://repositorio.iscte-
iul.pt/handle/10071/11184

Baez, M. (2004). New fixed assets management process design for

Pontifica ... Retrieved from http://scholarworks.rit.edu/cgi/
viewcontent.cgi?article=1540&context=theses

Nemmers, C. (2006). Asset Management. Retrieved from

https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pubrds/july97/tam.html
 70

Shamsudin, N. (2012). SCHOOL ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEM -

umpir.ump.edu.my. Retrieved from http://umpir.ump.edu.my
/id/eprint/4462/1/CD6526_NOOR_HARTINI_SHAMSUDIN.pdf

Esther, O. (2015). THE EFFECT OF INVENTORY MANAGEMENT

PRACTICES ON SERVICE DELIVERY AT ST. MARTIN’S HOSPITAL,
AGROYESUM,AMANSIE-WEST. Retrieved from
http://ir.knust.edu.gh/xmlui/handle/123456789/8573

Davis, R. (2016). An Introduction to Asset Management - hvds.co.nz.

Retrieved from http://www.hvds.co.nz/files/docs/
10695_iam_beginners_guide_low_9.pdf

U.S. Department of Transportation.(2007).“Asset Management Overview”

Brubaker, S. (n.d.). Asset Management 101: Basics for Small Water and
Wastewater System. Retrieved from
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-
10/documents/assetmgt101.pdf

St. Michael's College of Iligan City.(2009)“http://mail.smciligan.edu.ph”

Suen Man Lee. (2004). “A Software Engine for the Rapid Development of
Mobile Asset Management Systems”

Yaotai Lu. (2011). “Public Asset Management: Empirical Evidence from the
State Governments in the United States”
 71

APPENDIX A

Gantt Chart

Activities Responsible April April May May May June Aug Oct Oct Nov No
Person(s) 9-22 23- 1-3 4-18 21 1-2 6-28 2- 22- 1-4 v5
30 20 28
Come up with Cartagena
a research and Rojo
proposal
Chapter 1 Cartagena
Documentation and Rojo
Chapter 2 Cartagena
Documentation and Rojo
Chapter 3 Cartagena
Documentation and Rojo
Proposal Cartagena
Hearing and Rojo
Database Cartagena
Design and Rojo
Graphic User Cartagena
Interface (GUI) and Rojo
Coding Cartagena
Functions and Rojo
Chapter 3 Cartagena
Documentation and Rojo
System Testing Cartagena
and Rojo
Chapter 4 Cartagena
Documentation and Rojo
Chapter 5 Cartagena
Documentation and Rojo
 72

APPENDIX B

Questionnaire

ISO 9126 QUALITY SYSTEM ASSESSMENT TOOL

Name: __________________________________

Position:__________________________________ Designation: _____________________________

Instructions: Please rate the level of your agreement to the statement that describes the quality of the
system.Encircle the number that best represent your honest answer using the scale below.

5 – Extremely Agree (means 76 - 100% in agreement to the statement)

4 – Moderately Agree (means 56 - 75% in agreement to the statement)

3 - Somewhat Agree (means 26 - 55% in agreement to the statement)

2 – Slightly Agree (means 1 - 25% in agreement to the statement )

1 – Disagree (means no agreement on the statement)

Software Quality Statements Level of Agreement

1. The software is performing the assigned task. 1 2 3 4 5
2. The software is producing expected results. 1 2 3 4 5
3. The software can interact with other software systems. 1 2 3 4 5
4. The software is equipped with acceptable security measure. 1 2 3 4 5
5. The software is complying the user requirements. 1 2 3 4 5
6. The software can handle errors. 1 2 3 4 5
7. The software can resume and restore data. 1 2 3 4 5
8. The software is complying user-reliability requirements. 1 2 3 4 5
9. The software is easy to understand. 1 2 3 4 5
10. The software is easy to learn. 1 2 3 4 5
11. The software can operate in minimal effort. 1 2 3 4 5
12. The software’s interface appealing. 1 2 3 4 5
13. The software is complying user-usability requirements. 1 2 3 4 5
14. The software provide buttons and commands are labeled appropriately. 1 2 3 4 5
15. The users can use the system without much effort and more training. 1 2 3 4 5
16. The software is behaving in a timely manner. 1 2 3 4 5
17. The software is complying user-efficiency requirements. 1 2 3 4 5
18. The system automatically captures data which can be retrieved in 1 2 3 4 5
speedy manner.
19. The system supports minimum hardware requirements. 1 2 3 4 5
20. Overall, the software is valuable as a business solution of St. Michael’s 1 2 3 4 5
College, Iligan City.