Sie sind auf Seite 1von 32

DB questions:

What does UNION do? What is the difference


between UNION and UNION ALL ?
Hide answer

UNION merges the contents of two structurally-compatible tables into a single combined table. The
difference between UNION and UNION ALL is that UNION will omit duplicate records whereas UNION
ALL will include duplicate records.
It is important to note that the performance of UNION ALL will typically be better than UNION ,
since UNION requires the server to do the additional work of removing any duplicates. So, in cases where is
is certain that there will not be any duplicates, or where having duplicates is not a problem, use of UNION
ALL would be recommended for performance reasons.

List and explain the different types of JOIN clauses supported in ANSI-
standard SQL.
Hide answer

ANSI-standard SQL specifies five types of JOIN clauses as follows:


 INNER JOIN (a.k.a. “simple join”): Returns all rows for which there is at least one match in BOTH
tables. This is the default type of join if no specific JOIN type is specified.
 LEFT JOIN (or LEFT OUTER JOIN ): Returns all rows from the left table, and the matched rows from

the right table; i.e., the results will contain all records from the left table, even if
the JOIN condition doesn’t find any matching records in the right table. This means that if
the ON clause doesn’t match any records in the right table, the JOIN will still return a row in the
result for that record in the left table, but with NULL in each column from the right table.
 RIGHT JOIN (or RIGHT OUTER JOIN ): Returns all rows from the right table, and the matched rows
from the left table. This is the exact opposite of a LEFT JOIN ; i.e., the results will
contain all records from the right table, even if the JOIN condition doesn’t find any matching
records in the left table. This means that if the ON clause doesn’t match any records in the left table,
the JOIN will still return a row in the result for that record in the right table, but with NULL in each
column from the left table.
 FULL JOIN (or FULL OUTER JOIN ): Returns all rows for which there is a match in EITHER of the
tables. Conceptually, a FULL JOIN combines the effect of applying both a LEFT JOIN and
a RIGHT JOIN ; i.e., its result set is equivalent to performing a UNION of the results of left and right
outer queries.
 CROSS JOIN : Returns all records where each row from the first table is combined with each row

from the second table (i.e., returns the Cartesian product of the sets of rows from the joined tables).
Note that a CROSS JOIN can either be specified using the CROSS JOIN syntax (“explicit join
notation”) or (b) listing the tables in the FROM clause separated by commas without using
a WHERE clause to supply join criteria (“implicit join notation”).

For a table orders having a column defined simply as customer_id


VARCHAR(100) , consider the following two query results:
SELECT count(*) AS total FROM orders;
+-------+
| total |
+-------+
| 100 |
+-------+
SELECT count(*) AS cust_123_total FROM orders WHERE customer_id = '123';
+----------------+
| cust_123_total |
+----------------+
| 15 |
+----------------+

Given the above query results, what will be the result of the query
below?
SELECT count(*) AS cust_not_123_total FROM orders WHERE customer_id <> '123';
Hide answer
The obvious answer is 85 (i.e, 100 - 15). However, that is not necessarily correct. Specifically, any records
with a customer_id of NULL will not be included in either count (i.e., they won’t be included
in cust_123_total , nor will they be included in cust_not_123_total ). For example, if exactly one of the
100 customers has a NULL customer_id , the result of the last query will be:
+--------- ----------+
| cust_not_123_total |
+--------------------+
| 84 |
+--------------------+

Find top SQL developers today. Toptal can match you with the best
engineers to finish your project.
HIRE TOPTAL’S SQL DEVELOPERS

What will be the result of the query below? Explain your answer and
provide a version that behaves correctly.
select case when null = null then 'Yup' else 'Nope' end as Result;
View the answer →

Given the following tables:


sql> SELECT * FROM runners;
+----+--------------+
| id | name |
+----+--------------+
| 1 | John Doe |
| 2 | Jane Doe |
| 3 | Alice Jones |
| 4 | Bobby Louis |
| 5 | Lisa Romero |
+----+--------------+

sql> SELECT * FROM races;


+----+----------------+-----------+
| id | event | winner_id |
+----+----------------+-----------+
| 1 | 100 meter dash | 2 |
| 2 | 500 meter dash | 3 |
| 3 | cross-country | 2 |
| 4 | triathalon | NULL |
+----+----------------+-----------+

What will be the result of the query below?


SELECT * FROM runners WHERE id NOT IN (SELECT winner_id FROM races)

Explain your answer and also provide an alternative version of this


query that will avoid the issue that it exposes.
Hide answer

Surprisingly, given the sample data provided, the result of this query will be an empty set. The reason for
this is as follows: If the set being evaluated by the SQL NOT IN condition contains any values that are null,
then the outer query here will return an empty set, even if there are many runner ids that match winner_ids
in the races table.
Knowing this, a query that avoids this issue would be as follows:

SELECT * FROM runners WHERE id NOT IN (SELECT winner_id FROM races WHERE winner_id IS
NOT null)

Note, this is assuming the standard SQL behavior that you get without modifying the
default ANSI_NULLS setting.
Given two tables created and populated as follows:
CREATE TABLE dbo.envelope(id int, user_id int);
CREATE TABLE dbo.docs(idnum int, pageseq int, doctext varchar(100));

INSERT INTO dbo.envelope VALUES

(1,1),
(2,2),
(3,3);

INSERT INTO dbo.docs(idnum,pageseq) VALUES

(1,5),
(2,6),
(null,0);
What will the result be from the following query:
UPDATE docs SET doctext=pageseq FROM docs INNER JOIN envelope ON
envelope.id=docs.idnum
WHERE EXISTS (

SELECT 1 FROM dbo.docs


WHERE id=envelope.id
);

Explain your answer.


Hide answer

The result of the query will be as follows:

idnum pageseq doctext


1 5 5
2 6 6
NULL 0 NULL
The EXISTS clause in the above query is a red herring. It will always be true since ID is not a member
of dbo.docs . As such, it will refer to the envelope table comparing itself to itself!
The idnum value of NULL will not be set since the join of NULL will not return a result when attempting a
match with any value of envelope .

What is wrong with this SQL query? Correct it so it executes properly.


SELECT Id, YEAR(BillingDate) AS BillingYear
FROM Invoices
WHERE BillingYear >= 2010;
Hide answer

The expression BillingYear in the WHERE clause is invalid. Even though it is defined as an alias in the
SELECT phrase, which appears before the WHERE phrase, the logical processing order of the phrases of
the statement is different from the written order. Most programmers are accustomed to code statements
being processed generally top-to-bottom or left-to-right, but T-SQL processes phrases in a different order.

The correct query should be:

SELECT Id, YEAR(BillingDate) AS BillingYear


FROM Invoices
WHERE YEAR(BillingDate) >= 2010;

Given these contents of the Customers table:


Id Name ReferredBy
1 John Doe NULL
2 Jane Smith NULL
3 Anne Jenkins 2
4 Eric Branford NULL
5 Pat Richards 1
6 Alice Barnes 2

Here is a query written to return the list of customers not referred by


Jane Smith:
SELECT Name FROM Customers WHERE ReferredBy <> 2;

What will be the result of the query? Why? What would be a better way
to write it?
Hide answer

Although there are 4 customers not referred by Jane Smith (including Jane Smith herself), the query will
only return one: Pat Richards. All the customers who were referred by nobody at all (and therefore have
NULL in their ReferredBy column) don’t show up. But certainly those customers weren’t referred by Jane
Smith, and certainly NULL is not equal to 2, so why didn’t they show up?

SQL Server uses three-valued logic, which can be troublesome for programmers accustomed to the more
satisfying two-valued logic (TRUE or FALSE) most programming languages use. In most languages, if you
were presented with two predicates: ReferredBy = 2 and ReferredBy <> 2, you would expect one of them to
be true and one of them to be false, given the same value of ReferredBy. In SQL Server, however, if
ReferredBy is NULL, neither of them are true and neither of them are false. Anything compared to NULL
evaluates to the third value in three-valued logic: UNKNOWN.

The query should be written in one of two ways:

SELECT Name FROM Customers WHERE ReferredBy IS NULL OR ReferredBy <> 2

…or:

SELECT Name FROM Customers WHERE ISNULL(ReferredBy, 0) <> 2; -- (Or COALESCE() )

Watch out for the following, though!

SELECT Name FROM Customers WHERE ReferredBy = NULL OR ReferredBy <> 2

This will return the same faulty set as the original. Why? We already covered that: Anything compared to
NULL evaluates to the third value in the three-valued logic: UNKNOWN. That “anything” includes NULL
itself! That’s why SQL Server provides the IS NULL and IS NOT NULL operators to specifically check for
NULL. Those particular operators will always evaluate to true or false.

Even if a candidate doesn’t have a great amount of experience with SQL Server, diving into the intricacies
of three-valued logic in general can give a good indication of whether they have the ability learn it quickly
or whether they will struggle with it.
Considering the database schema displayed in the SQLServer-style
diagram below, write a SQL query to return a list of all the invoices. For
each invoice, show the Invoice ID, the billing date, the customer’s
name, and the name of the customer who referred that customer (if any).
The list should be ordered by billing date.

Hide answer

SELECT i.Id, i.BillingDate, c.Name, r.Name AS ReferredByName


FROM Invoices i

JOIN Customers c ON i.CustomerId = c.Id


LEFT JOIN Customers r ON c.ReferredBy = r.Id
ORDER BY i.BillingDate;

This question simply tests the candidate’s ability take a plain-English requirement and write a corresponding
SQL query. There is nothing tricky in this one, it just covers the basics:
 Did the candidate remember to use a LEFT JOIN instead of an inner JOIN when joining the
customer table for the referring customer name? If not, any invoices by customers not referred by
somebody will be left out altogether.
 Did the candidate alias the tables in the JOIN? Most experienced T-SQL programmers always do
this, because repeating the full table name each time it needs to be referenced gets tedious quickly.
In this case, the query would actually break if at least the Customer table wasn’t aliased, because it
is referenced twice in different contexts (once as the table which contains the name of the invoiced
customer, and once as the table which contains the name of the referring customer).
 Did the candidate disambiguate the Id and Name columns in the SELECT? Again, this is something
most experienced programmers do automatically, whether or not there would be a conflict. And
again, in this case there would be a conflict, so the query would break if the candidate neglected to
do so.
Note that this query will not return Invoices that do not have an associated Customer. This may be the
correct behavior for most cases (e.g., it is guaranteed that every Invoice is associated with a Customer, or
unmatched Invoices are not of interest). However, in order to guarantee that all Invoices are returned no
matter what, the Invoices table should be joined with Customers using LEFT JOIN:

SELECT i.Id, i.BillingDate, c.Name, r.Name AS ReferredByName


FROM Invoices i

LEFT JOIN Customers c ON i.CustomerId = c.Id


LEFT JOIN Customers r ON c.ReferredBy = r.Id
ORDER BY i.BillingDate;

Assume a schema of Emp ( Id, Name, DeptId ) , Dept ( Id,


Name) .
If there are 10 records in the Emp table and 5 records in the Dept table,
how many rows will be displayed in the result of the following SQL
query:
Select * From Emp, Dept

Explain your answer.


Hide answer
The query will result in 50 rows as a “cartesian product” or “cross join”, which is the default whenever the
‘where’ clause is omitted.

Given a table SALARIES, such as the one below, that has m =


male and f = female values. Swap all f and m values (i.e., change
all f values to m and vice versa) with a single update query and no
intermediate temp table.
Id Name Sex Salary
1 A m 2500
2 B f 1500
3 C m 5500
4 D f 500
Hide answer

UPDATE SALARIES SET sex = CASE sex WHEN 'm' THEN 'f' ELSE 'm' END

Given two tables created as follows


create table test_a(id numeric);

create table test_b(id numeric);

insert into test_a(id) values

(10),
(20),
(30),
(40),
(50);

insert into test_b(id) values

(10),
(30),
(50);

Write a query to fetch values in table test_a that are and not
in test_b without using the NOT keyword.
Note, Oracle does not support the above INSERT syntax, so you would
need this instead:
insert into test_a(id) values (10);
insert into test_a(id) values (20);
insert into test_a(id) values (30);
insert into test_a(id) values (40);
insert into test_a(id) values (50);
insert into test_b(id) values (10);
insert into test_b(id) values (30);
insert into test_b(id) values (50);
Hide answer

In SQL Server, PostgreSQL, and SQLite, this can be done using the except keyword as follows:
select * from test_a
except
select * from test_b;
In Oracle, the minus keyword is used instead. Note that if there are multiple columns, say ID and Name, the
column should be explicitly stated in Oracle queries: Select ID from test_a minus select ID from
test_b
MySQL does not support the except function. However, there is a standard SQL solution that works in all
of the above engines, including MySQL:
select a.id
from test_a a
left join test_b b on a.id = b.id
where b.id is null;
Given a table TBL with a field Nmbr that has rows with the following
values:
1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1
Write a query to add 2 where Nmbr is 0 and add 3 where Nmbr is 1.
Hide answer

This can be done as follows:

update TBL set Nmbr = case when Nmbr = 0 then Nmbr+2 else Nmbr+3 end;

Write a SQL query to find the 10th highest employee salary from
an Employee table. Explain your answer.
(Note: You may assume that there are at least 10 records in
the Employee table.)
Hide answer

This can be done as follows:

SELECT TOP (1) Salary FROM


(

SELECT DISTINCT TOP (10) Salary FROM Employee ORDER BY Salary DESC
) AS Emp ORDER BY Salary
This works as follows:

First, the SELECT DISTINCT TOP (10) Salary FROM Employee ORDER BY Salary DESC query will select
the top 10 salaried employees in the table. However, those salaries will be listed in descending order. That
was necessary for the first query to work, but now picking the top 1 from that list will give you
the highest salary not the the 10th highest salary.
Therefore, the second query reorders the 10 records in ascending order (which the default sort order)
and then selects the top record (which will now be the lowest of those 10 salaries).
Not all databases support the TOP keyword. For example, MySQL and PostreSQL use the LIMIT keyword,
as follows:
SELECT Salary FROM
(

SELECT DISTINCT Salary FROM Employee ORDER BY Salary DESC LIMIT 10


) AS Emp ORDER BY Salary LIMIT 1;

Or even more concisely, in MySQL this can be:

SELECT DISTINCT Salary FROM Employee ORDER BY Salary DESC LIMIT 9,1;

And in PostgreSQL this can be:

SELECT DISTINCT Salary FROM Employee ORDER BY Salary DESC LIMIT 1 OFFSET 9;

Write a SQL query using UNION ALL (not UNION ) that uses
the WHERE clause to eliminate duplicates. Why might you want to do
this?
Hide answer

You can avoid duplicates using UNION ALL and still run much faster than UNION DISTINCT (which is
actually same as UNION) by running a query like this:
SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE a=X UNION ALL SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE b=Y AND a!=X
The key is the AND a!=X part. This gives you the benefits of the UNION (a.k.a., UNION DISTINCT )

command, while avoiding much of its performance hit.


Given the following tables:
SELECT * FROM users;

user_id username
1 John Doe
2 Jane Don
3 Alice Jones
4 Lisa Romero

SELECT * FROM training_details;

user_training_id user_id training_id training_date


1 1 1 "2015-08-02"
2 2 1 "2015-08-03"
3 3 2 "2015-08-02"
4 4 2 "2015-08-04"
5 2 2 "2015-08-03"
6 1 1 "2015-08-02"
7 3 2 "2015-08-04"
8 4 3 "2015-08-03"
9 1 4 "2015-08-03"
10 3 1 "2015-08-02"
11 4 2 "2015-08-04"
12 3 2 "2015-08-02"
13 1 1 "2015-08-02"
14 4 3 "2015-08-03"

Write a query to to get the list of users who took the a training lesson
more than once in the same day, grouped by user and training lesson,
each ordered from the most recent lesson date to oldest date.
Hide answer
SELECT

u.user_id,
username,
training_id,
training_date,
count( user_training_id ) AS count
FROM users u JOIN training_details t ON t.user_id = u.user_id
GROUP BY u.user_id,
username,
training_id,
training_date
HAVING count( user_training_id ) > 1
ORDER BY training_date DESC;
user_id username training_id training_date count
4 Lisa Romero 2 August, 04 2015 00:00:00 2
4 Lisa Romero 3 August, 03 2015 00:00:00 2
1 John Doe 1 August, 02 2015 00:00:00 3
3 Alice Jones 2 August, 02 2015 00:00:00 2

What is an execution plan? When would you use it? How would you
view the execution plan?
Hide answer

An execution plan is basically a road map that graphically or textually shows the data retrieval methods
chosen by the SQL server’s query optimizer for a stored procedure or ad hoc query. Execution plans are
very useful for helping a developer understand and analyze the performance characteristics of a query or
stored procedure, since the plan is used to execute the query or stored procedure.

In many SQL systems, a textual execution plan can be obtained using a keyword such as EXPLAIN , and
visual representations can often be obtained as well. In Microsoft SQL Server, the Query Analyzer has an
option called “Show Execution Plan” (located on the Query drop down menu). If this option is turned on, it
will display query execution plans in a separate window when a query is run.
List and explain each of the ACID properties that collectively guarantee
that database transactions are processed reliably.
Hide answer

ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) is a set of properties that guarantee that database
transactions are processed reliably. They are defined as follows:
 Atomicity. Atomicity requires that each transaction be “all or nothing”: if one part of the transaction
fails, the entire transaction fails, and the database state is left unchanged. An atomic system must
guarantee atomicity in each and every situation, including power failures, errors, and crashes.
 Consistency. The consistency property ensures that any transaction will bring the database from one
valid state to another. Any data written to the database must be valid according to all defined rules,
including constraints, cascades, triggers, and any combination thereof.
 Isolation. The isolation property ensures that the concurrent execution of transactions results in a
system state that would be obtained if transactions were executed serially, i.e., one after the other.
Providing isolation is the main goal of concurrency control. Depending on concurrency control
method (i.e. if it uses strict - as opposed to relaxed - serializability), the effects of an incomplete
transaction might not even be visible to another transaction.
 Durability. Durability means that once a transaction has been committed, it will remain so, even in
the event of power loss, crashes, or errors. In a relational database, for instance, once a group of
SQL statements execute, the results need to be stored permanently (even if the database crashes
immediately thereafter). To defend against power loss, transactions (or their effects) must be
recorded in a non-volatile memory.

Given a table dbo.users where the column user_id is a unique


numeric identifier, how can you efficiently select the first 100
odd user_id values from the table?
(Assume the table contains well over 100 records with
odd user_id values.)
Hide answer

SELECT TOP 100 user_id FROM dbo.users WHERE user_id % 2 = 1 ORDER BY user_id

How can you select all the even number records from a table? All the
odd number records?
Hide answer

To select all the even number records from a table:


Select * from table where id % 2 = 0

To select all the odd number records from a table:


Select * from table where id % 2 != 0

What are the NVL and the NVL2 functions in SQL? How do they differ?
Hide answer
Both the NVL(exp1, exp2) and NVL2(exp1, exp2, exp3) functions check the value exp1 to see if it is
null.
With the NVL(exp1, exp2) function, if exp1 is not null, then the value of exp1 is returned; otherwise, the
value of exp2 is returned, but case to the same data type as that of exp1 .
With the NVL2(exp1, exp2, exp3) function, if exp1 is not null, then exp2 is returned; otherwise, the
value of exp3 is returned.

What is the difference between


the RANK() and DENSE_RANK() functions? Provide an example.
Hide answer

The only difference between the RANK() and DENSE_RANK() functions is in cases where there is a “tie”; i.e.,
in cases where multiple values in a set have the same ranking. In such cases, RANK() will assign non-
consecutive “ranks” to the values in the set (resulting in gaps between the integer ranking values when there
is a tie), whereas DENSE_RANK() will assign consecutive ranks to the values in the set (so there will be no
gaps between the integer ranking values in the case of a tie).
For example, consider the set {25, 25, 50, 75, 75, 100} . For such a set, RANK() will return {1, 1, 3,
4, 4, 6} (note that the values 2 and 5 are skipped), whereas DENSE_RANK() will return {1,1,2,3,3,4} .

What is the difference between the WHERE and HAVING clauses?


View the answer →
Suppose we have a Customer table containing the following data:
CustomerID CustomerName
1 Prashant Kaurav
2 Ashish Jha
3 Ankit Varma
4 Vineet Kumar
5 Rahul Kumar

Write a single SQL statement to concatenate all the customer names


into the following single semicolon-separated string:
Prashant Kaurav; Ashish Jha; Ankit Varma; Vineet Kumar; Rahul Kumar
Hide answer

SELECT CustomerName+ '; '


From Customer
For XML PATH('')
This is close, but will have an undesired trailing ;. One way of fixing that could be:
SELECT top 1
LTRIM(STUFF((SELECT &#39;; &#39; + c1.CustomerName FROM Customer c1 FOR XML PATH
(&#39;&#39;)), 1, 1,&#39;&#39;)) as SSV
from Customer c2;

In PostgreSQL one can also use this syntax to achieve the fully correct result:

SELECT array_to_string(array_agg(CustomerName), '; '::text)


FROM Customer

Given a table Employee having columns empName and empId , what


will be the result of the SQL query below?
select empName from Employee order by 2 desc;
Hide answer
“Order by 2” is only valid when there are at least two columns being used in select statement. However, in
this query, even though the Employee table has 2 columns, the query is only selecting 1 column name, so
“Order by 2” will cause the statement to throw an error while executing the above sql query.

What will be the output of the below query, given an Employee table
having 10 records?
BEGIN TRAN
TRUNCATE TABLE Employees
ROLLBACK
SELECT * FROM Employees
Hide answer

This query will return 10 records as TRUNCATE was executed in the transaction. TRUNCATE does not itself
keep a log but BEGIN TRANSACTION keeps track of the TRUNCATE command.

1. What is the difference between single-row functions and multiple-


row functions?
2. What is the group by clause used for?
Hide answer
1. Single-row functions work with single row at a time. Multiple-row functions work with data of
multiple rows at a time.

2. The group by clause combines all those records that have identical values in a particular field or
any group of fields.

What is the difference between char and varchar2 ?


Hide answer

When stored in a database, varchar2 uses only the allocated space. E.g. if you have
a varchar2(1999) and put 50 bytes in the table, it will use 52 bytes.
But when stored in a database, char always uses the maximum length and is blank-padded. E.g. if you
have char(1999) and put 50 bytes in the table, it will consume 2000 bytes.

Write an SQL query to display the text CAPONE as:


C
A
P
O
N
E

Or in other words, an SQL query to transpose text.


Hide answer

Declare @a nvarchar(100)='capone';
Declare @length INT;
Declare @i INT=1;
SET @lenght=LEN(@a)
while @i<=@length
BEGIN
print(substring(@a,@i,1));
set @i=@i+1;
END

In Oracle SQL, this can be done as follows:

SELECT SUBSTR('CAPONE', LEVEL, 1)


FROM DUAL CONNECT BY LEVEL <= LENGTH('CAPONE');

Can we insert a row for identity column implicitly?


Hide answer

Yes, like so:

SET IDENTITY_INSERT TABLE1 ON

INSERT INTO TABLE1 (ID,NAME)


SELECT ID,NAME FROM TEMPTB1

SET IDENTITY_INSERT OFF


Given this table:
Testdb=# Select * FROM "Test"."EMP";

ID
----

1
2
3
4
5
(5 rows)

What will be the output of below snippet?


Select SUM(1) FROM "Test"."EMP";
Select SUM(2) FROM "Test"."EMP";
Select SUM(3) FROM "Test"."EMP";
Hide answer

5
10
15

Table is as follows:
ID C1 C2 C3

1 Red Yellow Blue


ID C1 C2 C3

2 NULL Red Green

3 Yellow NULL Violet

Print the rows which have ‘Yellow’ in one of the columns C1, C2, or
C3, but without using OR .
Hide answer

SELECT * FROM table


WHERE 'Yellow' IN (C1, C2, C3)

Write a query to insert/update Col2 ’s values to look exactly opposite


to Col1 ’s values.
Col1 Col2

1 0

0 1

0 1

0 1

1 0

0 1

1 0

1 0
Hide answer
update table set col2 = case when col1 = 1 then 0 else 1 end

Or if the type is numeric:

update table set col2 = 1 - col1

How do you get the last id without the max function?


Hide answer

In MySQL:

select id from table order by id desc limit 1

In SQL Server:

select top 1 id from table order by id desc

What is the difference between IN and EXISTS ?


Hide answer

IN :
 Works on List result set

 Doesn’t work on subqueries resulting in Virtual tables with multiple columns

 Compares every value in the result list

 Performance is comparatively SLOW for larger resultset of subquery

EXISTS :

 Works on Virtual tables

 Is used with co-related queries

 Exits comparison when match is found

 Performance is comparatively FAST for larger resultset of subquery

Suppose in a table, seven records are there.


The column is an identity column.
Now the client wants to insert a record after the identity value 7 with its
identity value starting from 10 .
Is it possible? If so, how? If not, why not?
View the answer →

How can you use a CTE to return the fifth highest (or Nth highest)
salary from a table?
View the answer →
Imagine a single column in a table that is populated with either a single
digit (0-9) or a single character (a-z, A-Z). Write a SQL query to print
‘Fizz’ for a numeric value or ‘Buzz’ for alphabetical value for all values
in that column.
Example:
['d', 'x', 'T', 8, 'a', 9, 6, 2, 'V']
…should output:
['Buzz', 'Buzz', 'Buzz', 'Fizz', 'Buzz','Fizz', 'Fizz',
'Fizz', 'Buzz']
Hide answer

SELECT col, case when upper(col) = lower(col) then 'Fizz' else 'Buzz' end as FizzBuzz
from table;

How do you get the Nth-highest salary from the Employee table without
a subquery or CTE?
Hide answer

SELECT salary from Employee order by salary DESC LIMIT 2,1


This will give the third-highest salary from the Employee table. Accordingly we can find out Nth salary
using LIMIT (N-1),1 .
But MS SQL Server doesn’t support that syntax, so in that case:

SELECT salary from Employee order by salary DESC


OFFSET 2 ROWS
FETCH NEXT 1 ROW ONLY
OFFSET ’s parameter corresponds to the (N-1) above.

Given the following table named A :


x
------

2
-2

4
-4
-3

0
2

Write a single query to calculate the sum of all positive values of x and
he sum of all negative values of x .
Hide answer

select sum(case when x>0 then x else 0 end)sum_pos,sum(case when x<0 then x else 0
end)sum_neg from a;

Given the table mass_table :


weight

5.67

34.567

365.253

34

Write a query that produces the output:


weight kg gms

5.67 5 67

34.567 34 567

365.253 365 253

34 34 0
Hide answer

select weight, trunc(weight) as kg, nvl(substr(weight - trunc(weight), 2), 0) as gms


from mass_table;

Consider the Employee table below.


Emp_Id Emp_name Salary Manager_Id

10 Anil 50000 18

11 Vikas 75000 16

12 Nisha 40000 18

13 Nidhi 60000 17

14 Priya 80000 18
Emp_Id Emp_name Salary Manager_Id

15 Mohit 45000 18

16 Rajesh 90000 –

17 Raman 55000 16

18 Santosh 65000 17

Write a query to generate below output:


Manager_Id Manager Average_Salary_Under_Manager

16 Rajesh 65000

17 Raman 62500

18 Santosh 53750
Hide answer

select b.emp_id as "Manager_Id",

b.emp_name as "Manager",
avg(a.salary) as "Average_Salary_Under_Manager"
from Employee a,

Employee b
where a.manager_id = b.emp_id
group by b.emp_id, b.emp_name
order by b.emp_id;

How do you copy data from one table to another table ?


View the answer →
Find the SQL statement below that is equal to the following: SELECT
name FROM customer WHERE state = 'VA';
1. SELECT name IN customer WHERE state IN ('VA');
2. SELECT name IN customer WHERE state = 'VA';
3. SELECT name IN customer WHERE state = 'V';
4. SELECT name FROM customer WHERE state IN ('VA');
Hide answer

4. SELECT name FROM customer WHERE state IN ('VA');

How to find a duplicate record?


1. duplicate records with one field
2. duplicate records with more than one field
Hide answer

1. duplicate records with one field

2. SELECT name, COUNT(email)

3. FROM users

4. GROUP BY email
5. HAVING COUNT(email) > 1

6. duplicate records with more than one field

7. SELECT name, email, COUNT(*)

8. FROM users

9. GROUP BY name, email

10. HAVING COUNT(*) > 1