Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
net/publication/236661599
CITATIONS READS
21 72
1 author:
Michael J. Schlosser
University of Vienna
78 PUBLICATIONS 699 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Michael J. Schlosser on 23 April 2015.
MICHAEL J. SCHLOSSER
Abstract. This survey article (which will appear as a chapter in the book
“Computer Algebra in Quantum Field Theory: Integration, Summation and
Special Functions”, Springer-Verlag) provides a small collection of basic material
on multiple hypergeometric series of Appell-type and of more general series of
related type.
1. Introduction
Hypergeometric series and its various generalizations, in particular such involv-
ing multiple series, appear in various branches of mathematics and its applications.
This survey article features a small collection of selected material on multiple hy-
pergeometric series of Appell -type and of more general series of closely related
type.
These types of series appear very naturally in quantum field theory, in particular
in the computation of analytic expressions for Feynman integrals (for which we
kindly refer to other relevent chapters in this volume). Such integrals can be
obtained and computed in different ways – which may lead to identities for Appell
series (see e.g. M.A. Shpot [30]). On the other hand, the application of known
relations for Appell series may lead to simplifications, help to solve problems or
lead to more insight in quantum field theory. Therefore it is of importance that
people working in this area have a basic understanding of the existing theory for
such series1. This survey is meant to provide a very digestible, easy introduction to
Appell-type series. Besides of recalling some known results including various useful
identities satisfied by the series, some of the standard mathematical techniques
which are used to prove and derive these identities are illustrated. We highlight
some of the most fundamental properties and relations for Appell hypergeometric
series and further give hints of similar relations for the series which are (slightly)
beyond the hierarchy of Appell series. All the series we consider admit very explicit
series and integral representations.
Partially supported by FWF Austrian Science Fund grants S9607 & F50-08.
1
Researchers working with Feynman integrals who are in demand of effective manipulation
of Appell-type series including differential reductions and -expansions may find HYPERDIRE
(located at https://sites.google.com/site/loopcalculations/) useful, which is a set of
Wolfram Mathematica based programs for differential reduction of Horn-type hypergeometric
functions, see V. Bytev et al. [9].
1
2 MICHAEL J. SCHLOSSER
To warn the reader: There exist various different types of multivariate hyperge-
ometric series which are not covered in this survey. In particular, here we do not
treat multiple hypergeometric series associated with root systems [16, 20, 25, 29],
hypergeometric series of matrix argument [15], and other types of multivariate
hypergeometric series such as those which mainly appear in the study of orthog-
onal polynomials of severable variables (often also associated with root systems)
[11, 22].
A very important extension of Appell-type series which is just beyond the scope
of this basic survey article are the multivariate hypergeometric functions consid-
ered by I.M. Gelfand, M.M. Kapranov, and A.V. Zelevinsky [14], developed in
the late 1980’s. These A-hypergeometric functions (or GKZ-hypergeometric func-
tions) are fundamental objects in the theory of integrable systems as they are the
holonomic solutions of a (certain) A-hypergeometric system of partial differential
equations. Natural questions regarding algebraic solutions and monodromy for
A-hypergeometric functions have been recently addressed by F. Beukers [4, 5].
For basic (or q-series) analogues of Appell functions, see G. Gasper and M. Rah-
man’s text [13, Ch. 10].
2. Appell series
Appell series are a natural two-variable extension of hypergeometric series. They
are treated with detail in Érdelyi et al. [12], the classical reference for special
functions.
In the following, we follow to great extent the expositions from the classical
texts of W.N. Bailey [3], and L.J. Slater [31] (both contain a great amount of
material on hypergeometric series).
For convenience, we use the Pochhammer symbol notation for the shifted fac-
torial,
(
a(a + 1) . . . (a + n − 1) if n = 1, 2, . . . ,
(a)n := (1a)
1 if n = 0.
Accordingly, we have
Γ(a + n)
(a)n = (1b)
Γ(a)
which is used as a definition for the shifted factorial in case n is not necessarily a
nonnegative integer.
The goal is to generalize the Gauß hypergeometric function
X
a, b (a)n (b)n n
2 F1 ;x = x
c n≥0
n! (c)n
F1 a; b, b0 ; c; x, 0 = F2 a; b, b0 ; c, c0 ; x, 0 = F3 a, a0 ; b, b0 ; c; x, 0
(4a)
0
a, b
= F4 a; b; c, c ; x, 0 = 2 F1 ;x . (4b)
c
F1 a; b, 0; c; x, y = F2 a; b, 0; c, c0 ; x, y = F3 a, a0 ; b, 0; c; x, y
(5a)
a, b
= 2 F1 ;x . (5b)
c
4 MICHAEL J. SCHLOSSER
Using ideas of N.Ja. Vilenkin [32], W. Miller, Jr. [24] has given a Lie theoretic
interpretation of the Appell functions F1 . In particular, he showed that sl(5, C)
is the dynamical symmetry algebra for the F1 .
2.1. Contiguous relations and recursions. All contiguous relations for the F1
function can be derived from these four relations:
(a − b − b0 ) F1 a; b, b0 ; c; x, y − a F1 a + 1; b, b0 ; c; x, y
+b F1 a; b + 1, b0 ; c; x, y + b0 F1 a; b, b0 + 1; c; x, y = 0,
(6a)
c F1 a; b, b0 ; c; x, y − (c − a) F1 a; b, b0 ; c + 1; x, y
−a F1 a + 1; b, b0 ; c + 1; x, y = 0,
(6b)
0 0
c F1 a; b, b ; c; x, y + c(x − 1) F1 a; b + 1, b ; c; x, y
−(c − a)x F1 a; b + 1, b0 ; c + 1; x, y = 0,
(6c)
c F1 a; b, b0 ; c; x, y + c(y − 1) F1 a; b, b0 + 1; c; x, y
−(c − a)y F1 a; b, b0 + 1; c + 1; x, y = 0.
(6d)
Similar sets of relations exist for the other Appell functions, see R.G. Buschman [8].
Recently, X. Wang [35] has used contiguous relations and induction to derive
various recursion formulae for all the Appell functions F1 , F2 , F3 , F4 . (Some of the
recursions for F2 were previously given by S.B. Opps, N. Saad and H.M. Srivas-
tava [26].) For n = 1 these recursions reduce to equivalent forms of the known
contiguous relations.
In particular, for F1 we have
n
0 0 bx X
F1 a + k; b + 1, b0 ; c + 1; x, y
F1 a + n; b, b ; c; x, y = F1 a; b, b ; c; x, y +
c k=1
n
b0 y X
F1 a + k; b, b0 + 1; c + 1; x, y ,
+ (7a)
c k=1
n−1
0 0 bx X
F1 a − k; b + 1, b0 ; c + 1; x, y
F1 a − n; b, b ; c; x, y = F1 a; b, b ; c; x, y −
c k=1
n−1
b0 y X
F1 a − k; b, b0 + 1; c + 1; x, y ,
− (7b)
c k=1
n
0 0 ax X
F1 a + 1; b + k, b0 ; c + 1; x, y ,
F1 a; b + n, b ; c; x, y = F1 a; b, b ; c; x, y +
c k=1
(7c)
n−1
0 0 ax X
F1 a + 1; b − k, b0 ; c + 1; x, y ,
F1 a; b − n, b ; c; x, y = F1 a; b, b ; c; x, y −
c k=1
(7d)
MULTIPLE HYPERGEOMETRIC SERIES 5
F1 a; b, b0 ; c − n; x, y = F1 a; b, b0 ; c; x, y
n
F1 a + 1; b + 1, b0 ; c − k + 2; x, y
X
+ abx
k=1
(c − k)(c − k + 1)
n
F1 a + 1; b, b0 + 1; c − k + 2; x, y
X
0
+ ab y . (7e)
k=1
(c − k)(c − k + 1)
For F2 we have
F2 a + n; b, b0 ; c, c0 ; x, y = F2 a; b, b0 ; c, c0 ; x, y
n
bx X
F2 a + k; b + 1, b0 ; c + 1, c0 ; x, y
+
c k=1
n
b0 y X
F2 a + k; b, b0 + 1; c, c0 + 1; x, y ,
+ 0 (8a)
c k=1
F2 a − n; b, b0 ; c, c0 ; x, y = F2 a; b, b0 ; c, c0 ; x, y
n−1
bx X
F2 a − k; b + 1, b0 ; c + 1, c0 ; x, y
−
c k=1
n−1
b0 y X
F2 a + k; b, b0 + 1; c, c0 + 1; x, y ,
− 0 (8b)
c k=1
F2 a; b + n, b0 ; c, c0 ; x, y = F2 a; b, b0 ; c, c0 ; x, y
n
ax X
F2 a + 1; b + k, b0 ; c + 1, c0 ; x, y ,
+ (8c)
c k=1
F2 a; b − n, b0 ; c, c0 ; x, y = F2 a; b, b0 ; c, c0 ; x, y
n−1
ax X
F2 a + 1; b − k, b0 ; c + 1, c0 ; x, y ,
− (8d)
c k=1
F2 a; b, b0 ; c − n, c0 ; x, y = F2 a; b, b0 ; c, c0 ; x, y
n
F2 a + 1; b + 1, b0 ; c − k + 2, c0 ; x, y
X
+ abx . (8e)
k=1
(c − k)(c − k + 1)
For F3 we have
F3 a + n, a0 ; b, b0 ; c; x, y = F3 a, a0 ; b, b0 ; c; x, y
n
bx X
F3 a + k, a0 ; b + 1, b0 ; c + 1; x, y ,
+ (9a)
c k=1
F3 a − n, a0 ; b, b0 ; c; x, y = F3 a, a0 ; b, b0 ; c; x, y
6 MICHAEL J. SCHLOSSER
n−1
bx X
F3 a − k, a0 ; b + 1, b0 ; c + 1; x, y ,
− (9b)
c k=1
F3 a, a0 ; b, b0 ; c − n; x, y = F3 a, a0 ; b, b0 ; c; x, y
n
F3 a + 1, a0 ; b + 1, b0 ; c − k + 2; x, y
X
+ abx
k=1
(c − k)(c − k + 1)
n 0 0
X F 3 a, a + 1; b, b + 1; c − k + 2; x, y
+ a0 b 0 y .
k=1
(c − k)(c − k + 1)
(9c)
F4 a + n; b; c, c0 ; x, y = F4 a; b; c, c0 ; x, y
n
bx X
F4 a + k; b + 1; c + 1, c0 ; x, y
+
c k=1
n
by X
F4 a + k; b + 1; c, c0 + 1; x, y ,
+ 0 (10a)
c k=1
F4 a − n; b; c, c0 ; x, y = F4 a; b; c, c0 ; x, y
n−1
bx X
F4 a − k; b + 1; c + 1, c0 ; x, y
−
c k=1
n−1
by X
F4 a − k; b + 1; c, c0 + 1; x, y ,
− 0 (10b)
c k=1
F4 a; b; c − n, c0 ; x, y = F4 a; b; c, c0 ; x, y
n−1
F4 a + 1; b + 1; c − k + 1, c0 ; x, y
X
+ abx . (10c)
k=1
(c − k)(c − k − 1)
n Xn−i
n n − i (b)i (b0 )k
0
X
F1 a − n; b, b ; c; x, y =
i=0 k=0
i k (c)k+i
× (−x)i (−y)j F1 a; b + i, b0 + k; c + i + k; x, y , (11b)
MULTIPLE HYPERGEOMETRIC SERIES 7
n
0
X n (a)k
xk F1 a + k; b + k, b0 ; c + k; x, y ,
F1 a; b + n, b ; c; x, y = (11c)
k=0
k (c)k
n
X n (a)k
F1 a; b − n, b0 ; c; x, y = (−x)k F1 a + k; b, b0 ; c + k; x, y ,
(11d)
k=0
k (c)k
or
n
0
X n (a)k (b)k
xk F4 a + k; b + k; c + k, c0 ; x, y . (12)
F4 a; b; c − n, c ; x, y =
k=0
k (c)k (c − n)k
Then
(a + m + n)(b + m)
Am+1,n = Am,n ,
(1 + m)(c + m + n)
and
(a + m + n)(b0 + n)
Am,n+1 = Am,n .
(1 + n)(c + m + n)
Denoting the partial differential operators by
∂ ∂
θ=x and φ=y ,
∂x ∂y
we readily see that z = F1 satisfies the partial differential equations
1
(θ + φ + a)(θ + b) − θ(θ + φ + c − 1) z = 0, (13a)
x
1
(θ + φ + a)(φ + b0 ) − φ(θ + φ + c − 1) z = 0.
(13b)
x
Now let
∂z ∂z ∂z ∂z ∂z 2 ∂z 2
p= , q= , r= , s= , t = .
∂x ∂y ∂x ∂y ∂x2 ∂y 2
Then z = F1 satisfies the partial differential equations
x(1 − x)r + y(1 − x)s + [c − (a + b + 1)x]p − byq − abz = 0, (14a)
y(1 − y)t + x(1 − y)s + [c − (a + b0 + 1)y]q − b0 xp − ab0 z = 0. (14b)
Similarly, z = F2 satisfies the partial differential equations
x(1 − x)r − xys + [c − (a + b + 1)x]p − byq − abz = 0, (15a)
y(1 − y)t − xys + [c0 − (a + b0 + 1)y]q − b0 xp − ab0 z = 0. (15b)
Similarly, z = F3 satisfies the partial differential equations
x(1 − x)r + ys + [c − (a + b + 1)x]p − abz = 0, (16a)
0 0 0 0
y(1 − y)t + xs + [c − (a + b + 1)y]q − a b z = 0. (16b)
8 MICHAEL J. SCHLOSSER
Thus,
X X (a)m+n ZZ
0 0
I= n m
x y ub−1+n v b −1+m (1 − u − v)c−b−b −1 du dv
m≥0 n≥0
m!n!
b + n, b0 + m, c − b − b0
X X (a)m+n
n m
= x y Γ ,
m!n! c+m+n
m≥0 n≥0
which yields
0
b, b , c − b − b0
F1 a; b, b0 ; c; x, y .
I=Γ (18)
c
While I is a double integral, a single integral for F1 even exists, see (22).
Similarly,
Z 1Z 1
0 0 0 0
ub−1 v b −1 (1 − u)c−b −1 (1 − v)c −b −1 (1 − ux − vy)−a du dv
0 0
0
b, b , c − b, c0 − b0
F2 a; b, b0 ; c, c0 ; x, y ,
=Γ 0 (19)
c, c
MULTIPLE HYPERGEOMETRIC SERIES 9
and
ZZ
0 0 0
ub−1 v b −1 (1 − u − v)c−b−b −1 (1 − ux)−a (1 − vy)−a du dv
0
b, b , c − b − b0
F3 a, a0 ; b, b0 ; c0 ; x, y ,
=Γ 0 (20)
c
the last integral taken over the triangular region u ≥ 0, v ≥ 0, u + v ≤ 1.
The double integral for F4 is more complicated:
Z 1Z 1
0
ua−1 v b−1 (1 − u)c−a−1 (1 − v)c −b−1 (1 − ux)−b (1 − vy)−a
0 0
c+c0 −a−b−1
uvxy
× 1− du dv
(1 − ux)(1 − vy)
a, b, c − a, c0 − b
F4 a; b; c, c0 ; x(1 − y), y(1 − x) .
=Γ 0 (21)
c, c
In 1881, É. Picard [27] discovered a single integral for F1 . Let
Z 1
0 0
I = ua−1 (1 − u)c−a−1 (1 − ux)−b (1 − uy)−b du,
0
where <c > <a > 0. Then
1
0
XXZ (b)m m m (b0 )n n n
I = ua−1 (1 − u)c−a−1 u x u y du
m≥0 n≥0 0 m! n!
X X (b)m (b0 )n Z 1
m n
= x y ua+m+n−1 (1 − u)c−a−1 du
m≥0 n≥0
m!n! 0
X X (b)m (b0 )n
a + m + n, c − a
m n
= x y Γ ,
m!n! c+m+n
m≥0 n≥0
hence
0 a, c − a
F1 a; b, b0 ; c; x, y .
I =Γ (22)
c
we have
c − a, b0
X (a)m (b)m
0
−b0 m y
F1 a; b, b ; c; x, y = (1 − y) x 2 F1 ;
m≥0
m! (c)m c + m y−1
−b0 0 y
= (1 − y) F3 a, c − a; b, b ; c; x, . (37)
y−1
Hence, any F1 function can be expressed in terms of an F3 function. The converse
is only true when c = a + a0 .
• a0 = c − a and b0 = c − b in F3 :
Since by Equation (34) the F1 function reduces to an ordinary 2 F1 function
when c = b + b0 , we have
y a, c − b y − x
F3 a, c − a; b, c − b; c; x, = (1 − x)−a (1 − y)c−b 2 F1 ; .
y−1 c 1−x
(38)
• c0 = a in F2 :
0
−b0 0 0 x
F2 a; b, b ; c, a; x, y = (1 − y) F1 b; a − b , b ; c; x, . (39)
1−y
Conversely, any F1 function can be expressed in terms of an F2 function where
c0 = a.
If further c = a, then
b, b0
0
−b −b0 xy
F2 a; b, b ; a, a; x, y = (1 − x) (1 − y) 2 F1 ; . (40)
a (1 − x)(1 − y)
2.6. An expansion of an F4 series. In 1940 and 1941, J.L. Burchnall and
T.W. Chaundy [6, 7] gave the following expansion of an F4 series in terms of
products of two hypergeometric 2 F1 series:
F4 a; b; c, c0 ; x(1 − y), y(1 − x)
X (a)m (b)m (1 + a + b − c − c0 )m
= 0
xm y m
m≥0
m! (c)m (c )m
a + m, b + m a + m, b + m
× 2 F1 ; x 2 F1 ; y . (41)
c+m c0 + m
This expansion has applications to classical orthogonal polynomials. It can also
be used to deduce the double integral representation for F4 . Various special cases
are interesting enough to state separately:
• c0 = 1 + a + b − c in F4 :
We have the product formula
a, b a, b
F4 a; b; c, 1 + a + b − c; x(1 − y), y(1 − x) = 2 F1 ; x 2 F1 ; y . (42)
c c0
• c0 = b in F4 :
MULTIPLE HYPERGEOMETRIC SERIES 13
• c0 = b and c = a in F4 :
Further specialization of (43) gives the quite attractive summation formula
He arrived at a complete set of 34 different functions among which are the Appell
functions F1 , F2 , F3 , F4 .
They include series such as
X X (a)m+n (b)n−m (b0 )m−n
G1 (a, b, b0 ; x, y) := xm y n , (45)
m≥0 n≥0
m!n!
X X (a)2m+n (b)n
H3 (a, b, c; x, y) := xm y n , (46)
m≥0 n≥0
(c)m+n m!n!
and
X X (a)2m−n (b)n (b0 )n
H7 (a, b, b0 , c; x, y) := xm y n . (47)
m≥0 n≥0
(c)m m!n!
14 MICHAEL J. SCHLOSSER
3.2. Kampé de Fériet series. In 1937, J. Kampé de Fériet [18] introduced the
following bivariate extension of the generalized hypergeometric series:
a1 , . . . , ap : b1 , b01 ; . . . ; bq , b0q ;
p:q
Fr:s x, y
c1 , . . . , cr : d1 , d01 ; . . . ; ds , d0s ;
X X (a1 )m+n . . . (ap )m+n (b1 )m (b01 )n . . . (bq )m (b0q )n xm y n
= . (48)
m≥0 n≥0
(c1 )m+n . . . (cr )m+n (d1 )m (d01 )n . . . (ds )m (d0s )n m!n!
Numerous identities exist for special instances of such series. For illustration,
we list three summation formulae.
• P.W. Karlsson [19], 1994:
0:3 − : a, d − a; b, d − b; c, −c; e, e + d − a − b − c
F1:1 1, 1 = Γ , (49)
d : e, d + e − a − b − c; e − c, e + d − a − b
where <(e) > 0 and <(d + e − a − b − c) > 0.
• S.N. Pitre and J. Van der Jeugt [28], 1996:
0:3 − : a, d − a; b, d − b; c, d − c; e, e + d − a − b − c, e − d
F1:1 1, 1 = Γ , (50)
d : e, d + e − a − b − c; e − a, e − b, e − c
where <(e − d) > 0 and <(d + e − a − b − c) > 0. Further
0:3 − : a, d − a; b, d − b; c, e − c − 1;
F1:1 1, 1
d : e, d + e − a − b − c;
1 − a, 1 − b, e, e − d, d + e − a − b − c
=Γ , (51)
1 − d, e − a, e − b, e − c, 1 + d − a − b
where <(d + e − a − b − c) > 0, and d − a or d − b is a negative integer.
3.3. Lauricella series. In 1893, G. Lauricella [21] investigated properties of the
(n) (n) (n) (n)
following four series FA , FB , FC , FD , of n variables:
(n)
FA a; b1 , . . . , bn ; c1 , . . . , cn ; x1 , . . . , xn
X X (a)m +···+m (b1 )m . . . (bn )m
n m1
= ··· 1 n 1
x1 . . . xm
n ,
n
(52)
m ≥0 m ≥0
(c 1 ) m 1 . . . (c n ) mn m 1 ! . . . mn !
1 n
(n)
FB a1 , . . . , an ; b1 , . . . , bn ; c; x1 , . . . , xn
X X (a1 )m . . . (an )m (b1 )m . . . (bn )m
n m1
= ··· 1 n 1
x 1 . . . xm
n ,
n
(53)
m ≥0 m ≥0
(c) m1 +···+mn m 1 ! . . . mn !
1 n
(n)
FC a; b; c1 , . . . , cn ; x1 , . . . , xn
MULTIPLE HYPERGEOMETRIC SERIES 15
(n)
FD a; b1 , . . . , bn ; c; x1 , . . . , xn
X X (a)m +···+m (b1 )m . . . (bn )m
n m1
= ··· 1 n 1
x1 . . . xm
n ,
n
(55)
m ≥0 m ≥0
(c) m 1 +···+m n m1 ! . . . mn !
1 n
References
[1] Appell, P.: Sur les séries hypergéométriques de deux variables et sur des équations différen-
tielles linéaires aux dérivées partielles. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de
l’Académie des sciences 90, 296-298 & 731-735 (1880)
[2] Appell, P., Kampé de Fériet, J.: Fonctions hypergéométriques et hypersphériques;
Polynômes d’Hermite. Gauthier–Villars, Paris (1926)
16 MICHAEL J. SCHLOSSER
[3] Bailey, W.N.: Generalized hypergeometric series, second edition. Cambridge Mathematical
Tract, No. 32. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1964)
[4] Beukers, F.: Algebraic A-hypergeometric functions. Invent. Math. 180, 589–610 (2010)
[5] Beukers, F.: Monodromy of A-hypergeometric functions. preprint arXiv:1101.0493 (2011)
[6] Burchnall, J.L., Chaundy, T.W.: Expansions of Appell’s double hypergeometric functions,
I. Quart. J. Math. (Oxford) 11, 249–270 (1940)
[7] Burchnall, J.L., Chaundy, T.W.: Expansions of Appell’s double hypergeometric functions,
II. Quart. J. Math. (Oxford) 12, 112–128 (1941)
[8] Buschman, R.G.: Contiguous relations for Appell functions. J. Indian Math. Soc. 29, 165–
171 (1987)
[9] Bytev, V.V., Kalmykov M.Yu., Kniehl B.A.: HYPERDIRE – HYPERgeometric functions
DIfferential REduction MATHEMATICA based packages for differential reduction of gener-
alized hypergeometric functions: now with p Fp−1 , F1 , F2 , F3 , F4 . preprint arXiv:1105.3565
(2011)
[10] Carlson, B.C.: Quadratic transformations of Appell functions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 7,
291–304 (1976)
[11] Dunkl, C.F., Xu, Y.: Orthogonal polynomials of several variables. Encyclopedia of Mathe-
matics and its Applications, vol. 81. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)
[12] Erdélyi, A., Magnus, W., Oberhettinger, F., Tricomi, F.G.: Higher transcendental func-
tions. Vol. I. Based on notes left by Harry Bateman. With a preface by Mina Rees. With a
foreword by E.C. Watson. Reprint of the 1953 original. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co.
Inc., Melbourne, FL (1981)
[13] Gasper, G., Rahman, M.: Basic hypergeometric series, second edition. Encyclopedia of
Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 96. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
[14] Gelfand, I.M., Kapranov, M.M., Zelevinsky, A.V.: Hypergeometric functions and toric
manifolds. Funct. Anal. and its Appl. 23, 94–106 (1989).
[15] Gross, K.I., Richards, D.St.P.: Total positivity, spherical series, and hypergeometric func-
tions of matrix argument. J. Approx. Th. 59 (2), 224–246 (1989)
[16] Heckman, G.J., Opdam, E.M.: Root systems and hypergeometric functions I. Compositio
Math. 64, 329–352 (1987)
[17] Horn, J.: Hypergeometrische Funktionen zweier Veränderlichen. Math. Ann. 105, 381–407
(1931)
[18] Kampé de Fériet, J.: La fonction hypergéométrique. Gauthier–Villars, Paris (1937)
[19] Karlsson, P.W.: Two hypergeometric summation formulae related to 9-j coefficients. J.
Phys. A 27 (20), 6943–6945 (1994)
[20] Koornwinder, T.H.K.: Special functions associated with root systems: a first introduction
for non-specialists. pp. 10–24 in Special functions and differential equations, K. Srinivasa
Rao, R. Jagannathan, G. Vanden Berghe and J. Van der Jeugt (eds.), Allied Publishers,
New Delhi (1998)
[21] Lauricella, G.: Sulle funzioni ipergeometriche a più variabili. Rediconti del Circolo Matem-
atico di Palermo 7 (S1), 111–158 (1893)
[22] Macdonald I.G.: Symmetric functions and orthogonal polynomials. U niversity Lecture
Series 12 Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (1998)
[23] Miller, W.Jr.: Lie theory and the Lauricella functions FD . SIAM J. Math. Anal. 4 (4),
638–655 (1973)
[24] Miller, W.Jr.: Lie theory and the Appell functions F1 . J. Math. Phys. 13 (9), 1393–1399
(1972)
[25] Milne, S.C.: Transformations of U (n + 1) multiple basic hypergeometric series. pp. 201–
243 in Physics and Combinatorics: Proceedings of the Nagoya 1999 International Work-
shop (Nagoya University, Japan, August 23–27, 1999), A.N. Kirillov, A. Tsuchiya, and H.
Umemura, (eds.), World Scientific, Singapore (2001)
MULTIPLE HYPERGEOMETRIC SERIES 17
[26] Opps, S.B., Saad, N., Srivastava, H.M.: Recursion formulas for Appell’s hypergeometric
function F2 with some applications to radiation field problem. Appl. Math. Comput. 207,
545–558 (2009)
[27] Picard, É.: Sur une extension aux fonctions de deux variables du problème de Riemann
relatif aux fonctions hypergéométriques. Annales scientifiques de l’É.N.S. 2e série 10, 305–
322 (1881)
[28] Pitre, S.N., Van der Jeugt, J.: Transformation and summation formulas for Kampé de
0:3
Fériet series F1:1 (1, 1). J. Math. Anal. Appl. 202 (1), 121–132 (1996)
[29] Rosengren, H.: Elliptic hypergeometric series on root systems. Adv. Math. 181, 417–447
(2004)
[30] Shpot, M.A.: A massive Feynman integral and some reduction relations for Appell func-
tions. J. Math. Phys. 48 (12), 123512, 13pp. (2007)
[31] Slater, L.J.: Generalized hypergeometric functions. Cambridge University Press, Cam-
bridge (1966)
[32] Vilenkin, N.Ja.: Special functions and the theory of group representations. Amer. Math.
Soc. Transl. of Math. Monographs 22. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (1968)
[33] Vilenkin, N.Ja.: Hypergeometric functions of several variables, and degenerate representa-
tions of the group SL(n, R). Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Mat. 4 (95), 50–55 (1970)
[34] Vilenkin, N.Ja., Klimyk A.U.: Representation of Lie groups and special functions, vol. 3.
Classical and quantum groups and special functions. Translated from the Russian by
V.A. Groza and A.A. Groza. Mathematics and its Applications (Soviet Series) 75. Kluwer
Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht (1992)
[35] Wang, X.: Recursion formulas for Appell functions. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 23
(6), 421–433 (2012)